Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ISSN22787763
Professor and Head of Department of EEE, Valliammai Engineering College,Chennai, India; 2 Second year PG Scholar,
ValliammaiEngineeringCollege,Chennai,India.
Email:subramanianpads@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
This work reports study of voltage sag in Power systems due to symmetrical and unsymmetrical faults, and its compensation
using STATCOM. The voltage and phase angle after the occurrence of various faults like LLL, LG and LLG faults are
determined to find the most affected bus. A procedure to evaluate the rating of the STATCOM connected to the most affected
bus is demonstrated. A framework is developed for finding the current injected by the STATCOM for all types of faults
considered. A program is developed in MATLAB environment to accomplish the above mentioned objectives. The
effectiveness of the program is validated by applying it to a standard 11 bus test system. It is observed that the STATCOM is
effective in compensating the most affected bus voltage magnitude for all types of faults considered.
Keywords : Faultcalculation,Rating,staticcompensator(STATCOM),Systemimpedancematrix,Algorithm,Voltagesag
compensation.
1 INTRODUCTION
owerfrequencydisturbancedescribeseventsthatare
slower and longer lasting compared to electrical
2 VOLTAGE SAG
Voltage sag is decrease in voltage below
threshold followed by recovery after a short period.
Voltagesagthresholdisquitedifferentfrominterruption
threshold and it is assumed to be equal to 90% of the
declared voltage by EN 50160 2000 and IEC 6100028
2002.
In IEEE 1159 1995, the under voltages are
classified as the voltages characterized by a magnitude
between 80% and 90% of the nominal voltage with
duration greater than 1 minute. A voltage dip is
characterized by a pair of data: the residual voltage, or
depth,andtheduration.Theresidualvoltageisthelowest
value of the voltage during the event. The depth is the
differencebetweenthereferencevoltageandtheresidual
IJOART
InternationalJournalofAdvancementsinResearch&Technology,Volume2,Issue4,April2013457
ISSN22787763
3.1.3
Modeling of STATCOM
TABLE 1
MODELING OF SYSTEM COMPONENTS
Components
Modeled as
Overhead
and positive-, negative,
Underground cables
and zero-sequence lumped
parameters
Transformers
positive-, negative-, and
zero-sequence
series
impedances
bulk supply point
a fixed sequence resistance
and sub-transient reactance.
Loads
static constant impedance
loads
impedance(Z)matrix[5]:
InvertingthesystemadmittancematrixYs
DirectformationofZ
Inthispaper,themethodofdirectformationofa
Zmatrix is employed. The Z matrix is assembled by
starting with a single element connected to the reference
bus and by adding one element at a time and
correspondinglymodifyingthematrixaftereachaddition.
Each added element should be connected to at least one
other bus of the system. This method is based on the
principle of modification of a Z matrix, which can be
describedasfollows:
Addingabranchbetweenexistingbuses
Addingabranchfromanewbustothereference
Adding a branch from a new bus to an existing
bus
Adding a branch from existing bus to the
reference.
I2=I0=0 (1)
If=I1=
(2)
Step4:Computethepostfaultbusvoltage
(3)
IJOART
InternationalJournalofAdvancementsinResearch&Technology,Volume2,Issue4,April2013458
ISSN22787763
Step2:Determinetheprefaultbusvoltagefrom
powerflowsolution.
Step3:Theshortcircuitcurrentfor
(i)LGFault
(4)
If=3*I1
(ii)LLGFault
I1=
(5)
(6)
I2=I1
(7)
I0=I1
(8)
I1=I2=I0=
Step4:Computethepostfaultbusvoltage
(i)Zerosequencevoltage
(9)
(ii)Positivesequencevoltage
(iii)Negativesequencevoltage
(11)
Voltageatcompensatedbusis
Ish
Vl=
(12)
(13)
Vsag=Vsag<
and
Vl=Vl<
(14)
and
Zr=Zr<
(15)
Zl=Zl<
Ish=Ish<
onecanderiveapparentpoweroftheSTATCOM
as equation (16) and active and reactive power are as
equation(17)andequation(18):
(16)
(
)
SSTAT=
(17)
PSTAT= cos+ cos
cos(+30)
(10)
cos(+30)
QSTAT=
sin+
sin
sin(+30)
(18)
sin(+30)
Takingintoaccountofpredefinedvaluesforsag
magnitudeandrestoredvoltageonegets:
(19)
cos(+30)
PSTAT= cos+ cos
cos(+30)
(20)
QSTAT= sin+ sin sin(+30)
sin(+30)
(22)
(23)
Expressingpreviousequationsinmatrixfor:
(24)
Therefor
IJOART
InternationalJournalofAdvancementsinResearch&Technology,Volume2,Issue4,April2013459
ISSN22787763
Then
=k<
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
)+ (34)
<(/2+ )
Ish=VskVt
Solving(31)gives
Ish=
)+
/k
=(
Twocasescanbeconsideredforthecalculationof
injectedcurrent
Case(i):
Vs>kVtcos
(Vt=
) (35)
Voltagecanberestoredtoprefaultvalue.
Case(ii):
(Vt=
)
Vs<kVtcos
Voltagemagnitudecanberestoredto
Vt=
(36)
(37)
Andfurther:
(45)
(46) (42)
(47)
(48)
Assumethatthecompensationstartsfromphase
thenVb,VcareuncompensatedvoltagesandIb,Icare
zero.
3V
(49)
k<=
(50)
Theequationofthesameformatasequation(31)
obtained.Solvingbythepreviouslydescribedmethod
givesIa=Ish,Va=Vt,Vcequaltotheuncompensated
voltage,andIa=0.
Then
(51)
(52)
k<=
)
followingthesamealgorithm,givesIb=Ish,
Vb=Vt
Further,
Theinjectedcurrentandphaseangleare
givenbyequation(32)and(34).
WhenIsh>Irate
(38)
Ish=Irate=
Thevoltagemagnitudethatcanberestoredas
givenby(33)andthephaseangleby(34).
givesIc=Ish,Vc=Vt
k<=
(53)
(54)
4.2.2 LG fault
4.2.3 LG fault
WhenLGfaultoccurs,negativeandzerosequence
networkshavetobeincludedincalculation,so
(39)
(40)
(41)
Thefollowingequationshavetobesatisfied:
(42)
(43)
Fromequation(39)(42)yields
(44)
Thefaultcurrentandvoltagecanbeexpressedas:
(55)
(56)
(57)
IJOART
InternationalJournalofAdvancementsinResearch&Technology,Volume2,Issue4,April2013460
ISSN22787763
Step2:
Step3:
Step4:
Step5:
calculatedasexplainedinsection4.2.
Step9: Determinethevoltageandphaseangleatthe
compensated bus by using equations (33) and
(34)
Step7:
B
us
n
o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
LLL
fault
Volta
ge,
in
p.u.
.
0.8788
0.8268
0.7270
0.7833
0.5153
0.5744
0.5184
0.000
0.3147
0.8749
0.6630
LG faut
LLG fault
Voltage, in p.u.
Voltage, in p.u.
Phase
a
0.8901
0.8378
0.7502
0.7856
0.7824
0.5979
0.6292
0.000
0.3354
0.8565
0.8222
Phase
b
0.9737
0.9750
0.9922
0.9994
0.9816
1.0090
0.9987
1.0871
1.0405
1.0014
0.9586
Phase
c
0.9737
0.9750
0.9922
0.9994
0.9816
1.0090
0.9987
1.0871
1.0405
1.0014
0.9586
Phase
a
0.9525
0.9550
0.9863
0.9989
0.9673
1.0154
0.9978
1.1357
1.0664
1.0024
0.9232
Phase
b
0.8440
0.7886
0.7147
0.7627
0.7367
0.5688
0.5907
0.000
0.3178
0.8434
0.7507
Phase
c
0.8440
0.7886
0.7147
0.7627
0.7367
0.5688
0.5907
0.000
0.3178
0.8434
0.7507
QSTAT, in p.u.
3.6362
IRATE, in p.u.
3.7066
Phase b
0.3585
Phase b
-2.3595
AgeneralizedprogramisdevelopedinMATLAB
Phase c
Phase c
3.4044
3.0216
toruntheloadflowonthetestsystembeforefault.The
resultsareshownintable2.
InjectedcurrentascalculatedandprovidedinTable5
TABLE 2
is used to calculate the voltage magnitude and angle at
LOAD FLOW RESULTS BEFORE FAULT
Bus No
Voltage , in p.u.
Angle, in degree
compensated bus (Bus no 9) as explained in section 4.2
1
1.06
0.000
andtheresultsarepresentedinTable6.
2
1.049
-0.76 9
3
1.008
-2.431
4
1.027
-1.445
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0.982
1.002
1.015
0.986
0.981
1.035
1.020
-7.090
-3.120
-4.296
-4.806
-4.550
-0.583
-3.420
TABLE 6
VOLTAGE MAGNITUDE AND ANGLE AT COMPENSATED
BUS
LLL fault
V9,
,in
Phases
LG fault
V9, in
,in
LLG fault
V9, in ,in
IJOART
InternationalJournalofAdvancementsinResearch&Technology,Volume2,Issue4,April2013461
ISSN22787763
in
p.u.
0.981
degre
es
43.7
p.u.
a
b
c
0.981
0.981
0.981
degree
s
-26.04
-204.1
67.13
p.u.
0.981
0.981
0.981
degree
s
-8.461
-110.35
-251.60
Ra , in
p.u.
0
0
0
Xd , in
p.u.
0.20
0.15
0.25
3
150
7 CONCLUSION
120
X0 , in p.u.
X1 , in p.u.
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.05
0.05
0.00
Reactive Power, in
MVAR
120
60
ChoiS.S,LiJ.D,andVilathgamuwaD.MAgeneralizedvoltage
compensation strategy for mitigating the impacts of voltage
sags/swells, IEEE Trans. Power Del., Vol. 20, No. 3, Jul. 2005,
pp.22892297.
[2] ElAraby E.E, Yorino N, and Sasaki H A comprehensive
approach for FACTS devices optimal allocation to mitigate
voltage collapse, in proceeding of IEEE Power Eng. Soc.
Transmission and Distrbution Conf. Exhibit., Asia Pacifc,
Yokohama,Japan,Oct.610,2002.
[3] Enrique Acha, Claudio R. FuerteEsquivel, Hugo Ambriz
Perez, Cesar AngelesCamacho, Book on FACTS Modeling
and Simulation in Power Networks, John Wiley & Sons Ltd,
2004.
[4] GoswamiA.K,GuptaC.P,SinghG.K,Minimizationofvoltage
sag induced financial losses in distribution systems using
LIST OF NOMENCLATURE
FACTS devices, Science direct, Electric Power systems
Research,Dec2010,pp.767774.
ZkkFaultimpedance
[5] HadiSaadat,BookonPowersystemAnalysis,McGrawHill
Vk
Voltageatfaultedbusk
Inc.,US,1998.
If
Shortcircuitcurrent
[6] HalpinS.MandGrigsbyL.L,Acomparisonoffaultcalculation
I1,I2,I0Positive,negativeandZerosequencecurrents
proceduresforindustrialpowerdistributionsystems:Thepast,
the present, and the future, in proceeding of IEEE Int. Conf.
Zfault Faultimpedance
IndustrialTechnology,Guangzhou,China,1994.
Ish
Injectedcurrent
[7] HaqueM.H,Compensationofdistributionsystemvoltagesag
Zl
Loadimpedance
byDVRandDSTATCOM,inproceedingofIEEEPortoPower
Zr
Theveninsimpedanceofthesystemobserved
Tech,Porto,Portugal,Sep.1013,2001
fromfaultedpoint
[8] Mohan Mathur R, Book on ThyristorBased Facts Controllers
for Electrical Transmission Systems, John Wiley & Sons Inc.,
Vf
Voltageatfaultedbusf
2002.
Ztf
transferimpedancebetweenbustandf
[9] Milanovi J. V, Thu A. M and Gupta C. P, The influence of
Ztt
primaryimpedanceofbust
faultdistributiononstochasticpredictionofvoltagesags,IEEE
Zft
transferimpedancebetweenbusfandt
Trans.PowerDel.,Vol.20,No.1,Jan.2005,pp.278285.
Zff
Impedanceoffaultbusf
[10] Milanovi J. V and Zhang Y Modeling of FACTS Devices for
[1]
IJOART