Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 7

The Use and Safety of Nu Skin® Products and Ingredient Information

The Use and Safety of Parabens in Nu Skin® Products

What Are Parabens?

Parabens are a very common group of organically synthesized preservatives used in cosmetics as well as drugs and foods. As a group of
multiple compounds, they include methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, isobutylparaben, and butylparaben. Like most preservatives,
they are antimicrobial, meaning they prevent the growth and reproduction of bacteria, mold, and fungi. This attribute allows parabens to keep
products safe for repeated consumption. All daily use, personal care products must contain some form of preservation.

How Nu Skin Uses Parabens

Nu Skin uses parabens to maintain product freshness because of their proven safety record and low irritation profile—and at extremely low
levels (usually between 0.1% to 0.8%). Nu Skin formulates its products within these guidelines for the beneficial qualities and safety that
parabens provide.

FDA and CTFA Proclaim Parabens Safe for Cosmetic Use

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Cosmetic Toiletries and Fragrance Association (CTFA) have thoroughly researched
the use of parabens in cosmetics. The FDA regulates product safety, and the CTFA provides specific ingredient safety through the Cosmetic
Ingredient Review Board (CIR). The CIR is an independent panel of renowned physicians and scientists that reviews ingredients used in
cosmetics since 1976. Both organizations continue to review research on parabens and, as recently as 2004, proclaimed them safe and
effective for use in cosmetic formulations.

Nu Skin's Commitment to Safety

Nu Skin actively monitors scientific research on all our ingredients, including parabens, to ensure our distributors can offer safe and
efficacious products. The majority of paraben research for the past 50 years supports the safety of parabens in consumer use. However,
misinformation circulated about recent paraben studies has caused undue concern that parabens may have weak estrogenic effects. Putting
these study results into perspective is important as we determine whether or not parabens are safe for use in cosmetics. There are many
other common substances, such as soy, that have more substantial estrogenic properties, but because these substances have been used
culturally for centuries without harmful effects they do not raise concern. Additionally, the recent paraben studies were conducted with
exaggerated levels of test material ingested or injected into animals rather than applied topically. The conclusion that parabens at extremely
low levels in a topical application would produce a similar outcome as an exaggerated use test is without direct evidence and unproven.
Since cosmetic products have very low levels of parabens, it is unscientific to assume they could be absorbed through the skin in any
significant amount to create adverse effects. In fact, to date there are no scientific studies that show a causal link between topical products
containing paraben and detrimental effects. The CTFA asserted in a statement on April 17, 2003:

Suggestions that parabens have an estrogenic potential or affect the male reproductive system are not relevant to the cosmetic use of these
ingredients. The level of parabens used in cosmetics is extremely low. (CTFA Response Statement, April 17, 2003; RSPT 03-12)

Nu Skin is committed to protecting product integrity and providing the best results for its customers. The long history of paraben use in
cosmetics, backed by the continued, careful research of the cosmetic industry, FDA, and other qualified sources, reassures our pledge of "all
of the good, none of the bad."
The Use and Safety of Methylisothiazolinone in Nu Skin® Products

Methylisothiazolinone and Methylchloroisothiazolinone (MI and MCI, respectively) are organic compounds that are effective preservatives in
a variety of cosmetic products like shampoos, conditioners, and eye makeup removers. These compounds offer antimicrobial benefits,
preventing the growth and reproduction of bacteria, mold, and fungi. Derived synthetically, MI and MCI protect the efficacy, color, and
consistency of products. Most personal care products contain preservatives for these very reasons.

Use of MI and MCI in Cosmetic Products

Concentrations of MI and MCI used in product formulations are extremely small. Extensive testing and research have determined that MI and
MCI can be used safely in rinse-off products at concentrations below 15 ppm (parts per million) and in leave-on products at concentrations
below 7.5 ppm. This means that if there were a million parts (grams) in the formula, MI and MCI would only take up 15 or 7.5.

The only Nu Skin® products that contain MI and MCI are rinse-off products at concentrations of about 5 ppm, well below the15 ppm margin
of safety. These products include shampoos, conditioners, and body washes.

Research on the Safety of MI and MCI

Overwhelmingly, studies on the use of MI and MCI in personal care products attest to their safety. In 1992, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review
(CIR), an independent panel of physicians and scientists that assesses cosmetic ingredients, thoroughly reviewed the research on MI and
MCI and found them to be safe for use in personal care products at the recommended levels. Furthermore, the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), which regulates the ingredient safety in cosmetic products, backs the use of MI and MCI when incorporated at concentrations
determined safe and effective.

At a recent meeting of the American Society for Cell Biology, one abstract claimed that MI could affect the nervous system. Any concerns
created by this isolated abstract are unwarranted because the context of this research does not relate to the cosmetic use of MI. The study
exposed rat nerve cells in test tubes to very high doses of MI. This kind of exposure is not comparable to the minute levels of MI in a skin
care product. In response to this study, the Cosmetic Toiletries and Fragrance Association (CTFA) reviewed the use of MI, reiterating the
problem of comparing this research to the actual use of MI in cosmetic products:

The experiments conducted with MI on extracted nerve cells in laboratory containers do NOT remotely resemble the possible consumer
exposure to this preservative. In fact, safety testing with animals has demonstrated that application of MI does NOT result in systemic toxicity
to the preservative. Clinical and functional effects on the nervous system have NOT been observed in relevant safety tests. (December 6,
2004)

In short, the use of MI and MCI in personal care products is not a safety concern for consumers. MI and MCI, in recommended
concentrations, provide vital benefits to products, preserving their quality, effectiveness, and safety.

Nu Skin's Commitment

Nu Skin is committed to providing its customers with the best and safest products. Having reviewed the latest research performed by the
cosmetic industry, the FDA, and other qualified sources, we can assure our customers that methylisothiazolinone and
methylchloroisothiazolinone are safe and effective as preservatives in Nu Skin products.

The Use and Safety of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate in Nu Skin® Products

Quality control is crucial to any company promoting products for better living. Nu Skin was founded on the belief that it could develop
products containing beneficial, effective, and safe ingredients. Commitment to this belief means only ingredients that have been determined
to be safe by major governmental and regulatory bodies are used. Nu Skin continues to monitor the latest research on ingredient safety to
maintain the highest standard of safety and quality.

The scientific committees that review these studies in the United States and Europe are associated with organizations such as the European
Commission Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (SCCP); Personal Care Products Council (PCPC)-formerly Cosmetics, Toiletries,
and Fragrance Association (CTFA); the European Cosmetic Toiletry and Perfumery Association (COLIPA); the Environmental Protection
Agency(EPA); the Food and Drug Administration (FDA); and the American Medical Association (AMA), to name a few. These review boards
are made up of unbiased and qualified scientists and professionals that understand the methods of scientific research and are experts in their
fields. These committees examine available studies on a given ingredient and determine human safety applications and environmental
impact when used in cosmetics. The PCPC provides ingredient safety information to the Cosmetic Industry through the Cosmetic Ingredient
Review board (CIR), a program established in 1976 to assess cosmetic ingredient safety in an unbiased, independent forum. The CIR is
comprised of an expert panel of respected physicians and scientists. Nu Skin is a member of the Personal Care Product Council and
respects CIR recommendations and findings.

What Is Sodium Lauryl Sulfate?

Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) is a chemical used for its superior foaming quality in hundreds of commercial products including shampoo,
bubble bath, mouthwash, and even candy. An extensive study of this compound found that, like other detergent agents, it can cause irritation
when left on the skin for extreme periods of time. However, "like many other chemicals, it is the manner of usage that is important. As long as
you do not rub it all over your body and reapply it every hour for 24 hours, it's perfectly safe," said researcher, Keith Green, PhD, DSC, of
the Medical College of Georgia, who began studying SLS and its compounds in 1982 and carried out his work through 1987. Dr. Green's
research has been misquoted in several e-mail messages and statements.

The American Cancer Society in response to circulation of inflammatory emails that question the safety of SLS has reported affirmatively that
(SLS) "does not cause cancer," (Ibid). The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) agree. The National Toxicology Program
and the International Agency for Research on Cancer both rate SLS as non-carcinogenic.

A report from an expert panel of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review committee released by the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association
concluded, " Sodium Lauryl Sulfate and Ammonium Lauryl Sulfate appear to be safe in formulations designed for discontinuous, brief use
followed by thorough rinsing from the surface of the skin” (Ibid).

Throughout the industry, cosmetic and hygiene companies use SLS and similar detergents to produce the foaming quality that helps to clean
more thoroughly by lifting dirt and particles more effectively. Sodium Lauryl Sulfate can be an irritant if formulated incorrectly, and a shampoo
containing 15 percent SLS is tolerable because it comes in contact with the scalp for just a few minutes and is diluted with water while in use.
Should it get in the eyes one would certainly want to flush it out as soon as possible, and swallowing a lot is not advised. Those are the
greatest dangers SLS poses to the average consumer. Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does require that fluoride
toothpastes shipped as of April 7, 1998, carry a warning label about the dangers of swallowing too much toothpaste, and Sodium Lauryl
Sulfate is identified as one of the three ingredients posing a health risk (along with Sorbitol and Fluoride), it is because it can cause diarrhea,
not because it causes cancer. http://www.snopes2.com/toxins/shampoo.htm

Nu Skin's Commitment to Safety

We are aware of the recent concerns involving Sodium Lauryl Sulfate and are closely monitoring all other research connected to this
ingredient. As a member of the Personal Care Product Council, Nu Skin continues its commitment to product quality and customer safety.

Alcohols and Their Use in Nu Skin® Products

What Are Alcohols?

Alcohols are organic compounds that contain one or more hydroxyl (OH) groups (an oxygen and hydrogen atom) bound to carbon atoms. On
ingredient labels, an alcohol usually ends with "ol" (Ethanol, Methanol, and Panthenol). Alcohols are characterized by their solubility in both
water and oil, which is determined by the length of the molecule's carbon chain. With a short carbon chain, an alcohol has greater solubility in
water, which means it will evaporate quickly, taking water with it, while an alcohol with a long carbon chain will hinder evaporation and hold
water down. Under a few specialized circumstances, such as unique chemical configuration, some short carbon chains alcohols actually
display moisturizing properties instead of the drying characteristic common to small alcohols.

How Do They Function?

In our day-to-day lives, alcohols are found in products with a variety of functions ranging from lipstick to hairsprays. There are hundreds of
different alcohols that can function as antioxidants, humectants, emulsifiers, surfactants, and solvents.

Many misperceptions exist about the use of alcohol in personal care products. People think of the drying effects and harshness of rubbing
alcohol or they think of the dehydrating effects of alcohol found in liquor and wine. In fact, these alcohols are only one type in a very large
group of chemicals that have many qualities and functions. To understand the variety within a group of alcohols, compare it to a group of
insects. Within the insect kingdom butterflies pollinate flowers and provide colorful beauty in the world, while other insects like mosquitoes
stinging and possibly carry disease. Similarly, there are many alcohols that are good for the skin by helping deliver the benefits of
moisturizing skin care products, while some alcohols can be irritating or drying to the skin and hair.
Fatty Alcohols vs. Harsh Alcohols

Most alcohols that deliver benefits to the skin are known as fatty alcohols and range in function as well. Some alcohols, like Panthenol and
propylene glycol, enhance a product's moisturizing qualities because they are humectants, binding water to the skin. Stearyl alcohol acts as
an emollient and an emulsifier. Tocopherol (also known as vitamin E) is well known for its antioxidant and moisturizing properties. Actually,
several vitamins, including vitamin A and vitamin B5, are alcohols.

Some alcohols are not beneficial for daily skin care. Harsh alcohols, including rubbing alcohol or ethanol, are extremely drying, but serve an
antibacterial function. SD-alcohol 40 is a blend of ethyl alcohol (drinking alcohol), specially denatured to make it unfit to drink. When used in
skin care products, these alcohols can dry and irritate the skin because of their high evaporation rate.

Alcohol-free

You may read on a label that a product is "alcohol-free." According to industry standards and regulations, this means that the product does
not contain ethyl alcohol, which is known for its harsh, drying effects. But that same product may contain fatty alcohols, which have much
different effects on skin. (The FDA describes how the term is used in the cosmetic industry: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/cos-227.html.)

Alcohols Used in Nu Skin® Products

Nu Skin employs fatty alcohols such as Panthenol, Propylene Glycol, Cetyl Alcohol, Butylene Glycol, and Cetearyl Alcohol that have proven
beneficial moisturizing properties. Although Nu Skin does use ethanol in a few product formulations, such as Epoch Hand Sanitizer because
it serves as an FDA-required active ingredient to instantly kill germs and bacteria, there are other hydrating and conditioning ingredients in
the formulations that counteract the drying effects. Nutriol HFT also contains undenatured Ethyl Alcohol, an ingredient that improves the
delivery of the beneficial powders in the product. Nu Skin consistently holds to its founding philosophy of "all of the good, none of the bad"
and, therefore, only uses alcohols that benefit your skin and make products effective.

The Use and Safety of Butylene and Propylene Glycols in Nu Skin® Products

Quality control is crucial to any company that promotes products for better living. Nu Skin was founded on the desire to develop beneficial,
effective, and safe cosmetics. Commitment to this belief means only ingredients that have been determined to be safe by major
governmental and regulatory bodies are used. Nu Skin continues to monitor the latest research on ingredient safety to maintain the highest
standard of safety and quality.

The scientific committees that review these studies in the United States and Europe are associated with organizations such as the European
Commission Scientific Committee for Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products (SCCNFP); Cosmetics, Toiletries, and Fragrance
Association (CTFA); the European Cosmetic Toiletry and Perfumery Association (COLIPA); the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA); and the American Medical Association (AMA), to name a few. These review boards are made up of
unbiased and qualified scientists and professionals that understand the methods of scientific research and are experts in their fields. These
committees examine available studies on a given ingredient and determine human safety applications and environmental impact when used
in cosmetics. The CTFA provides ingredient safety information to the cosmetic industry through the Cosmetic Ingredient Review board (CIR),
a program established in 1976 to assess cosmetic ingredient safety in an unbiased, independent forum. The CIR is comprised of an expert
panel of respected physicians and scientists. Nu Skin is a member of the Cosmetic Toiletries and Fragrance Association and respects CIR
recommendations and findings.

Butylene Glycol

Butylene glycol is an organic molecule with two alcohol groups, used in cosmetics as humectants to bind moisture and hold water to the skin.
Alcohols are attracted to water; the smaller alcohols evaporate quickly, drawing water away from the skin, while larger organic alcohols do
not evaporate as quickly and actually hold water to the skin.

According to the CIR panel, as printed in the Journal of the American College of Toxicology, Butylene glycol is "safe as presently used in
cosmetics." The report goes on to say that repeated insult patch tests on Butylene glycol produced no evidence of skin sensitization.

Nu Skin utilizes small amounts of Butylene glycol to benefit the formula and to provide skin conditioning and moisturizing properties to the
skin. With the ingredient data currently available, Nu Skin feels confident in the safe and effective use of this ingredient.

Propylene Glycol

Propylene glycol is an organic molecule with two alcohol groups and is used in cosmetics as humectants. It is the most common moisture-
carrying vehicle other than water itself and helps prevent moisture loss in products as well as binding to moisture and holding it to the skin.
Being a large organic alcohol, propylene glycol provides excellent moisturizing properties to the skin.

Nu Skin is committed to providing its customers with the best and safest products. Having reviewed the latest research performed by the
cosmetic industry, the FDA, and other qualified sources, we can assure our customers that Butylene and propylene Glycols are safe and
effective as humectants in Nu Skin® products.

The Final Report of the CIR Expert Panel for Propylene Glycol as published in the Journal of American Toxicology (13(6): 437-491, 1994)
concludes that propylene glycol is safe for use in cosmetic products at concentrations up to 50 percent. Propylene glycol is generally used in
concentrations below 10 percent in cosmetic products. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the FDA have also classified propylene
glycol as "generally recognized as safe" and even allows it to be used as a food additive.

Are cosmetic products safe?

Introduction

This is a very important question. Our appearance is our first impression to the world; so of course, we all want to apply only the very safest
products to our skin. In doing so, we expect the end result to be better skin, not skin which is irritated or damaged. To ensure this, most
reputable personal care companies perform a barrage of tests prior to launch and Nu Skin is no exception. Despite this assurance,
consumers are increasingly concerned about products in the marketplace - both foods and cosmetics - as more information becomes
available about what is healthy and what is harmful. While some of this information can be classed as 'misinformation', the use of the web
means that it is readily available and it is often difficult to sort out reliable data from bad. This all leads to more confusion over what to
choose to provide the best care for skin. At the same time as there is growing array of product choices for today's consumer. This article
outlines the Nu Skin philosophy to only develop and sell 'safe' personal care products and discusses some of the hot items getting attention
in the press and online.

"All of the good, none of the bad"

As the most basic consumer desire, producing safe, yet effective products is at the heart of Nu Skin's philosophy. In fact, the company was
founded on a principle of using "all of the good, none of the bad". This means using only the safest of safe ingredients which prove to be
beneficial for skin. In fact the original 13 products were specifically formulated to contain not only skin ingredients known to be beneficial to
skin, but also to omit any ingredients that could potentially cause harm to the skin. This philosophy is still followed by all Nu Skin products
today. Table 1 gives the original list of ingredients not used in any Nu Skin products to this day.

Table 1: Original list of ingredients that Nu Skin does not use

NU SKIN INGREDIENT PHILOSOPHY


Talc
Mineral Oil
Petrolatum
Paraffin Wax
Lanolin and Lanolin derivatives
Alcohol (approved as anti-microbial in hand sanitizer)

In today's products, Nu Skin ensures that all ingredients are obtained from reliable suppliers who have thoroughly tested the ingredients and
established a good safety profile. Additionally, once formulated in a product, Nu Skin R&D performs a battery of clinical testing which
confirms the safety of the final product. This means the products are tested on human volunteers to ensure that the products are safe. Even
the slightest report of skin irritation is followed up, thoroughly investigated and understood. In many cases this will result in changes being
made to the formulation with more testing until we are convinced that the formulation is safe for consumer use. These tests include, for
example, skin irritation, patch testing to ensure the product does not cause allergic reactions and ocular irritation to ensure the product does
not cause any eye irritation if the product is applied to the face. These tests do come at a price - many run into thousands of dollars, adding
to the cost of product development. Oftentimes, these studies are conducted on a panel of subjects with different ethnic diversity to ensure
the products are safe for all skin types.

"Natural" products

In recent years there has been an increase in consumer awareness of "green" issues and the "naturalness" of a product for environmental
and health reasons. Another trend gathering popularity is consumers wanting health focused, holistic products (which are often also organic)
in their lives. This trend parallels the desire to return to the simple life and "get back to basics", and there is increasing consumer demand
for plant-based simple, formulations that are mild yet very effective.

Consumers becoming more and more informed on natural trends have generated an increased demand for these natural and organic
ingredients in the skin care market. This has resulted in a boom in organic products available, i.e. those grown without pesticides for food
categories, and we are seeing this expanding to include cosmetic products. In fact, more organic and/or "all natural" products and cosmetic
lines are entering the market at a very rapid rate. It's important to note that there is presently no standardized government controlled
definition for a cosmetic product to put 'natural' on its package or in its advertising. Companies make their own definition of natural and often
use it liberally as a consumer 'buzzword'. Thus, it's important that consumers understand that "natural" does not ensure safety or the best
Additional Nu Skin Ingredient Information by Molly Nielsen, Product Support
productspecialist@nuskin.com<mailto:productspecialist@nuskin.com

Some further background information on our ingredients is as follows:

Founded on the guiding principle, "All of the good, none of the bad," Nu Skin has distinguished itself from other companies by finding the
best ingredients possible and avoiding harmful fillers. Since 1984, Nu Skin has produced the highest quality personal care products with the
winning combination of natural ingredients and innovative technology.

Nature provides healthy and beneficial ingredients for Nu Skin formulas, and science opens the door of innovation in active ingredient
delivery and profound product efficacy. With changing technologies and current trends, the focus of "All of the good, none of the bad" has
shifted to emphasizing the beneficial ingredients within our formulations. Nu Skin utilizes cutting edge technologies and ingredients at
efficacious levels. Our philosophy is backed by Nu Skin's expert Advisory Board composed of dermatologists and leading scientists in many
areas of expertise.

Some cosmetic ingredients (e.g. Diethanolamine (DEA) or Triethanolamine (TEA)) can have trace Nitrosamine contamination. A few older Nu
Skin formulations contain these ingredients and these products have been strenuously tested for safety. These ingredients are now avoided
for all new formulation development.

Parabens are a very common group of organically synthesized preservatives used in cosmetics as well as drugs and foods. As a group of
multiple compounds, they include methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, isobutylparaben, and butylparaben. Like most preservatives,
they are antimicrobial, meaning they prevent the growth and reproduction of bacteria, mold, and fungi. This attribute allows parabens to keep
products safe for repeated consumption. All daily use, personal care products must contain some form of preservation.

Nu Skin uses parabens to maintain product freshness because of their proven safety record and low irritation profile-and at extremely low
levels (usually between 0.1% to 0.8%). Nu Skin formulates its products within these guidelines for the beneficial qualities and safety that
parabens provide.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Cosmetic Toiletries and Fragrance Association (CTFA) have thoroughly researched
the use of parabens in cosmetics. The FDA regulates product safety, and the CTFA provides specific ingredient safety through the Cosmetic
Ingredient Review Board (CIR). The CIR is an independent panel of renowned physicians and scientists that reviews ingredients used in
cosmetics since 1976. Both organizations continue to review research on parabens and, as recently as 2004, proclaimed them safe and
effective for use in cosmetic formulations.

Parabens as a cosmetic ingredient has become an emotional consumer issue; Nu Skin is working to ensure that all new formulations and
older product re-formulations are paraben-free, when possible. Epoch formulations will transition when possible to be completely paraben-
free.

Nu Skin does not use phthalates as an ingredient in any formulation, and all formulations with ingredients that could potentially have trace
levels of acrylamide monomers meet international requirements / specification for monomers. And, all Nu Skin formulations are safety-
dermatologist tested.

Diazolidinyl urea is a preservative commonly used in cosmetic formulations. This ingredient combats bacterial contamination effectively and
displays anti-mold and anti-yeast properties, even when small quantities are used. Due to this fact, Nu Skin uses low concentrations of this
preservative in some products. Diazolidinyl urea is non-irritating to most people, even in concentrations significantly greater than those found
in Nu Skin products.

In a study done by Dr. Keith Green, professor of ophthalmology at the Medical College of Georgia, SLS has also been found to have
adverse effect to eyes. The chemical accumulates in the clear tissue and stays there for up to five or six days. The absorbed SLS causes
changes in the amounts of proteins in the eye, and creates a new kind of protein, not yet identified, in the eyes of rabbits treated in
experiments. SLS was also shown to slow healing of the corneal epithelium, the cellular surface of the clear tissue.

This study shows that the eyes of young persons and those in a healing stage are most susceptible to SLS damage. For adults in middle and
later years it may be linked to cataract formation. This study, though not the final word on SLS safety, may indicate caution in the use of SLS.
For the above reasons, SLS is not used in any skin care or hair care products in the Nu Skin line. Other companies are still using this
ingredient in their shampoos and cleansing products. As soon as this information was discovered, Nu Skin immediately changed all
formulations that contained SLS. This happened in late 1987.
SLS is contained in the AP-24 and Jungamals AP-24 toothpaste and is considered to be safe and effective for that purpose. In oral care
products, SLS is used as a foaming and anti-plaque agent. It helps give a good, bubbly mouth feel. In addition, SLS softens plaque and helps
it detach from teeth during the brushing process.

A few scientific investigations have reported the possibility of minor, oral mucosa irritation due to SLS. However, these studies did not mimic
normal usage of toothpaste containing SLS. For example, the toothpaste used in some studies contained unrealistic levels of SLS. Most
toothpaste formulas have less than 1% SLS, whereas these studies used much higher levels. AP-24 toothpaste contains much less SLS than
most other toothpastes.

Some studies created artificial oral hygiene systems which may have over exposed the mouth to undiluted toothpaste. In one study, the
toothpaste was applied directly to teeth (with no dilution from saliva) and allowed to remain in place for over 2 minutes. (Most adults today do
not brush for even one minute.) Therefore, the results obtained from this study are difficult to correlate with every day "normal" oral care
practices.

Major manufacturers of toothpaste have included SLS in their formulas for nearly half a century. With literally billions of repeated SLS
toothpaste applications, only a small percentage of adverse reactions have been reported. This is remarkable considering the consumer
population size and years this ingredient has been in daily use. There are always a few individuals who are sensitive to certain compounds.
SLS is no exception. At the present time, there are no substantiated studies that link SLS (in properly formulated oral care products) to oral
mucosa irritation, gum damage, or any carcinogenic condition. In fact, when one considers the length of time this raw material has been used
in oral care products and the extreme diversity of the consumer population, it could be regarded as one of the safest ingredients in the oral
care industry.

Sodium Laureth Sulfate is a higher foaming and less irritating modification of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate can be manufactured by ethoxylation of
the surfactant. The modified compound becomes known as Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate. The cosmetic name is Sodium Laureth Sulfate with
an abbreviated symbol of SLES.

The two ingredients may sound similar in the wording of their names but are different chemically. Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES) and
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) are two different ingredients with unique properties appropriate for different uses in personal care products.

Sodium Laureth Sulfate is a good cleansing agent that is not drying to the skin or hair. It is obtained from trilaurin, a component of coconut oil.
SLES reduces surface tension, meaning it allows the product to be more easily dispersed to cleanse a large area. While some studies
indicate that Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS), a commonly used surfactant, may be harmful to eyes, Sodium Laureth Sulfate has not been
shown to have the same effect.

No, Nu Skin does not use Toluene, Benzene or any other primary petroleum distillate as a cosmetic ingredient. However, some Nu Skin
ingredients are synthesized from starting materials which are petroleum based.

Only Nu Skin Nu Colour products utilize FD&C colors. At one time these colors were derived from a sap from coal. This is no longer the case.
These colors are now made synthetically and are not considered coal tar derivatives. These colors have been extensively studied and are
considered safe. In addition, only colors specifically approved for the eye area are used in eye shadows, eye liners and mascaras to ensure
protection of the eyes. FD&C colors provide consistent color from batch to batch and do not fade over time. Using these colors insures the
products will be the same each time you purchase them and stay true to color. Natural coloring agents do not provide these important
benefits. With natural coloring agents, batch colors may vary and the colors fade over time.

Nu Skin does not make "all natural" product claims. Nu Skin uses the best of both science and nature when formulating our
products.

Вам также может понравиться