Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 17

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

Karl B. Diether
Fisher College of Business

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

1 / 33

Portfolios

A portfolio is a collection of assets.


The weights fundamentally dene a portfolio. The weights are the proportion invested in each asset

Portfolios can contain many assets.


A portfolio can be completely comprised of risky assets. If you own only one asset do you still have portfolio? Yes, a pretty simple one.

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

2 / 33

Diversication

Diversication
The principle of diversication is fundamental to nance. Portfolios allow an investor to become diversied.

Which bet do you prefer?


Flip a fair coin once; if it is heads I will give a $1000, you get nothing if it is tails. Flip a fair coin 1000 times; each time you ip heads I will give you $1.00. I will give you nothing for tails. Most people prefer the second option; most of the risk is diversied away through multiple ips.

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

3 / 33

Diversication
You own Dell
Suppose you own only one security, Dell Computer Corp. What sources of risk do you face?

Systematic risk
What is systematic risk? What are some other names for systematic risk? Can you think of some concrete examples?

Idiosyncratic risk
What is idiosyncratic risk? What are some other names for idiosyncratic risk? Can you think of some concrete examples?
Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business) Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets 4 / 33

Diversication

Half in Dell and half in PepsiCo


Suppose instead you put half your money in Dell and half in PepsiCo.

What happens to your portfolios risk?


Why is idiosyncratic risk reduced? Arent you subject to more idiosyncratic risk? Bad things can happen to both Dell and Pepsi? Why is systematic risk unaected?

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

5 / 33

Adding Securities: Systematic and Idiosyncratic Risk

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

6 / 33

Adding Stocks to An Equal Weight Portfolio

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

7 / 33

Diversication

Dening a diversied portfolio


Are all portfolios with lots of securities diversied? Do other conditions need to be met to call a portfolio diversied?

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

8 / 33

Statistical Detour: Covariance

What is covariance?
Covariance is a measure of how much two variables move together.

Consider a few examples (source: Welch)


Negatively Covary Agility vs. Weight Wealth vs. Disease Zero Covariation IQ vs. Gender Age vs. Blood Type Positively Covary Wealth vs. Longevity Arm Strength vs. QB Quality

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

9 / 33

Covariance
Covariance
If x and y are random variables: cov(x , y ) = E x E (x ) y E (y )

Computing Covariance
If x and y are random variables that take on the values xi and yi with probability pi ,
n

cov(x , y ) =
i =1

pi xi E (x ) yi E (y )

If A and B are securities, then the covariance between the return on A and the return on B is written as the following:
n

cov(ra , rb ) =
i =1
Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

pi ria E (ra ) rib E (rb )


10 / 33

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

Spam and Donuts


You want to invest in Hormel and Krispy Kreme
What is the covariance between their returns (cov(rhrl , rkk ))? Scenario Good Normal Bad Probability 0.30 0.40 0.30 rhrl 0.12 0.08 0.08 rkk 0.20 0.10 0.00

Step 1: Compute the expected returns of Hormel and Krispy Kreme


E (rhrl ) = 0.3(0.12) + 0.4(0.08) + 0.3(0.08) = 9.2% E (rkk ) = 0.3(0.20) + 0.4(0.10) + 0.3(0.00) = 10%

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

11 / 33

Spam and Donuts


Step 2: Use the covariance formula
cov(rhrl , rkk ) = pg [rg ,hrl E (rhrl )][rg ,kk E (rkk )]+ pn [rn,hrl E (rhrl )][rn,kk E (rkk )]+ pb [rb,hrl E (rhrl )][rb,kk E (rkk )] = 0.3(0.12 0.092)(0.20 0.10)+ 0.4(0.08 0.092)(0.10 0.10)+ 0.3(0.08 0.092)(0.00 0.10) = 0.0012

What does 0.0012 tell us?


Does cov(rhrl , rkk ) = 0.0012 mean a strong relation or a weak one?
Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business) Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets 12 / 33

Correlation

Computing Correlation
If x and y are random variables, then the correlation between x and y ((x , y )) is the following: (x , y ) = cov(x , y ) (x ) (y )

If A and B are securities, then the covariance between the return on A and the return on B is written as the following: (ra , rb ) = cov(ra , rb ) (ra ) (rb )

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

13 / 33

Correlation: -1 to 1

Correlation ranges from -1 to 1


-1, indicates perfect negative correlation. 0, indicates that the two variables are unrelated. +1, indicates perfect positive correlation.

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

14 / 33

Correlation: Spam and Donuts

What is (rhrl , rkk )?


p 0.3(0.12 0.092)2 + 0.4(0.8 0.092)2 + 0.3(0.08 0.092)2 = 1.8% p (rb ) = 0.3(0.20 0.10)2 + 0.4(0.10 0.10)2 + 0.3(0.00 0.10)2 = 7.7% (ra ) = (rhrl , rkk ) = = cov(rhrl , rkk ) (rhrl ) (rkk ) 0.0012 = 0.87 (0.018)(0.077)

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

15 / 33

Estimating Covariance
Estimation
Usually we have to estimate covariances and correlations using past data just like variances.

Estimating Covariance
if ri 1 , ri 2 , ri 3 , . . .riT are one-period returns for security i , rj 1 , rj 2 , rj 3 , . . .rjT are one-period returns for security j , then the sample or estimated covariance is the following: 1 cov(ri , rj ) = T 1
T

(rit ri )(rjt rj )
t =1

where ri and rj are the sample means of returns for security i and j : 1 ri = T
Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

rit
t =1

1 and rj = T

rjt .
t =1
16 / 33

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

Estimating Correlation

The estimated or sample correlation coecient


(ri , rj ) = cov(ri , rj ) (rj ) (ri )

where (ri ) is the sample standard deviation of security i and (rj ) is the sample standard deviation of security j .

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

17 / 33

A Portfolio of Two Risky Assets

The return on a two-asset portfolio:


rp = wra + (1 w )rb ra is the return and w is the weight on asset A. rb is the return and 1 w is the weight on asset B. Note: the weights of the portfolio sum to one.

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

18 / 33

A Portfolio of Two Risky Assets


Two Asset Portfolio: Expected return and standard deviation
If A and B are assets and w is the portfolio weight on asset A, then the expected return of a portfolio composed of A and B is E (rp ) = wE (ra ) + (1 w )E (rb ), the variance of the portfolio is 2 (rp ) = w 2 2 (ra ) + (1 w )2 2 (rb ) + 2w (1 w ) cov(ra , rb ), and the standard deviation of the portfolio is (rp ) = 2 (rp ).

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

19 / 33

Asset Allocation: Two Risky Assets

Suppose you can invest in the following risky assets:


A stock index like the S&P 500. A corporate bond index.

How should you split your money?


What does it depend on? What information do you need to answer the question?

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

20 / 33

Asset Allocation: Two Risky Assets


Example: A stock index and bond index
E(r) 12% 4% (rs , rb ) = -0.10, cov(rs , rb ) = -0.0014 20% 7%

Stock Index Bond Index

What are the feasible allocations?


Try dierent weights: compute E (rp ) and (rp ) each time: E (rp ) = wE (rs ) + (1 w )E (rb ) 2 (rp ) = w 2 2 (rs ) + (1 w )2 2 (rb ) + 2w (1 w ) cov(rs , rb )

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

21 / 33

Investment Opportunity Set


18% 16% 14% 12%
Stock Index

E(r)

10% 8% 6% 4% 2%
Minimum Variance Portfolio Bond Index

2%

6%

10%

14%

18%

22%

26%

30%

34%

(r)
Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business) Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets 22 / 33

Asset Allocation: Two Risky Assets

Which portfolio should you choose?


In general its a matter of preference (for risk and expected return).

Can we rule out some portfolios?


Are some portfolios just plain stupid to hold? Is it just plain stupid to hold just bonds (100% in the bond)?

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

23 / 33

Investment Opportunity Set: Changes in

=-1 E(r) =0

=1

(r)
Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business) Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets 24 / 33

The Shape of the Investment Opportunity Set

The investment opportunity set


The shape of the investment opportunity set is determined by the covariance between the assets. if is suciently low we can nd a portfolio with lower variance than either of the assets. If two assets are perfectly negatively correlated you can diversify away all risk.

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

25 / 33

Adding a Riskfree Asset

Adding a risk free asset


Suppose that we also can invest in a riskfree asset with a return of 3%.

How does adding a riskfree asset change things?


What does the investment opportunity set look like now? Does adding a riskfree rate increase the number of portfolios that a rational and risk averse investor should avoid? Is there now a single optimal risky portfolio?

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

26 / 33

Investment Opportunity Set


18%
CAL 1

16% 14% 12%

E(r)

10% 8% 6% 4% 2%

2%

6%

10%

14%

18%

22%

26%

30%

34%

(r)
Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business) Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets 27 / 33

Investment Opportunity Set


18% 16% 14% 12%
CAL 1 CAL 2

E(r)

10% 8% 6% 4% 2%

2%

6%

10%

14%

18%

22%

26%

30%

34%

(r)
Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business) Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets 28 / 33

Investment Opportunity Set


18% 16% 14% 12%
CAL 1 CAL 2 CAL 3

E(r)

10% 8% 6% 4% 2%

2%

6%

10%

14%

18%

22%

26%

30%

34%

(r)
Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business) Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets 29 / 33

Which CAL is the Best?

Which CAL is the best?


Clearly CAL 3 is the best of the three. For a given standard deviation it oers more expected return. Also, for a given expected return it has a lower variance. The risky portfolio that denes CAL 3 is better than the risky portfolios that dene CAL 1 and CAL 2.

What is the optimal CAL?


It is CAL with the highest possible slope or the best expected return standard deviation tradeo.

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

30 / 33

Optimal CAL
18%
Optimal CAL

16% 14% 12%

E(r)

10% 8% 6% 4% 2%

2%

6%

10%

14%

18%

22%

26%

30%

34%

(r)
Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business) Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets 31 / 33

The Optimal CAL and the Tangency Portfolio


The optimal CAL is the one with the highest slope (Sharpe ratio)
Slope = E (rrisky ) rf (rrisky )

Properties and implications


The optimal CAL is the tangency line between the riskfree rate and the risky investment opportunity curve. The risky portfolio that the optimal CAL is tangent with is called the tangency portfolio. Investors will combine the tangency portfolio with the riskfree asset to form the overall portfolio the best suits their preferences for risk and expected return.

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

32 / 33

Looking Forward

Mean variance analysis


We will generalize our mean-variance analysis to portfolios with many risky assets.

Models
We will also introduce our rst model based on mean-variance analysis (The CAPM).

Karl B. Diether (Fisher College of Business)

Portfolio Theory: Two Risky Assets

33 / 33

Вам также может понравиться