Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
k
p
(, , z) = C
k
pp
(z)
k
p
(, , z) +C
k
pn
(z)
k
n
(, , z)
k
n
(, , z) = C
k
pn
T
(z)
k
p
(, , z) +C
k
nn
(z)
k
n
(, , z)
(3)
where the stress vector
k
and the strain vector
k
are split into in-plane and out-of-plane (normal) com-
ponents, respectively,
k
p
=
_
_
,
k
n
=
_
k
z
k
z
k
zz
_
_
,
k
p
=
_
_
,
k
n
=
_
k
z
k
z
k
zz
_
_
(4)
The matrix of stiness coecients follows a similar partition:
C
k
pp
=
_
_
C
k
11
C
k
12
0
C
k
12
C
k
22
0
0 0 C
k
66
_
_
, C
k
pn
=
_
_
0 0 C
k
13
0 0 C
k
23
0 0 0
_
_
, C
k
nn
=
_
_
C
k
55
0 0
0 C
k
44
0
0 0 C
k
33
_
_
(5)
where
C
k
11
(z) = C
k
22
(z) = C
k
33
(z) =
E
k
(z)
_
1
k
(z)
[1 +
k
(z)] [1 2
k
(z)]
C
k
12
(z) = C
k
13
(z) = C
k
23
(z) =
E
k
(z)
k
(z)
[1 +
k
(z)] [1 2
k
(z)]
C
k
44
(z) = C
k
55
(z) = C
k
66
(z) =
E
k
(z)
2 [1 +
k
(z)]
(6)
4
in which E
k
is the Youngs modulus and
k
is the Poissons ratio of layer k.
In the case of homogeneous layers, the elastic properties are constant along the thickness direction. In
the case of layers made of functionally graded material, E
k
and
k
are computed in this study according to
the law-of-mixtures as
E
k
(z) = E
k
bot
+
_
E
k
top
E
k
bot
_
V
k
f
(z)
k
(z) =
k
bot
+
_
k
top
k
bot
_
V
k
f
(z)
(7)
where P
k
bot
and P
k
top
denote the material property P of the bottom and top surface of layer k, respectively,
and V
f
(z) is the volume fraction of layer k. The volume fraction prole through the thickness is assumed
to obey a power-law function
V
k
f
(z) =
_
z z
k
z
k+1
z
k
_
(8)
where the exponent is the volume fraction index indicating the material variation along z [z
k
, z
k+1
].
2.2. A class of layerwise 2-D theories
Using a summation convention over repeated indices, the harmonic displacement vector for each layer
u
k
is expressed as follows:
u
k
=
_
_
F
() u
k
(, )
F
() v
k
(, )
F
() w
k
(, )
_
_
e
jt
= F
() u
k
(, )e
jt
(9)
in which = t, b, r (r = 2, . . . , N) is the theory-related index, F
k
p
= F
D
p
u
k
e
jt
(11)
k
n
= F
D
n
u
k
e
jt
+ F
u
k
e
jt
(12)
where
D
p
=
_
_
2
a
0 0
0
2
b
0
2
b
2
a
0
_
_
, D
n
=
_
_
0 0
2
a
0 0
2
b
0 0 0
_
_
(13)
and F
denotes dierentiation of F
k=1
__
+1
1
_
_
D
p
u
k
_
T
_
Z
k
spp
D
p
u
k
s
+Z
k
spn
D
n
u
k
s
+Z
k
spn
u
k
s
_
+
_
D
n
u
k
_
T
_
Z
k
snp
D
p
u
k
s
+Z
k
snn
D
n
u
k
s
+Z
k
snn
u
k
s
_
+ u
k
T
_
Z
k
snp
D
p
u
k
s
+Z
k
snn
D
n
u
k
s
+Z
k
snn
u
k
s
_
_
ab
4
dd
(14)
and
T
max
=
1
2
2
N
l
k=1
__
+1
1
Z
k
s
u
k
T
u
k
s
ab
4
dd (15)
where the following integrals over the layer thickness h
k
are introduced:
Z
k
spp
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
pp
dz Z
k
spn
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
pn
dz
Z
k
snp
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
np
dz Z
k
snn
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
nn
dz
Z
k
spn
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
pn
dz Z
k
snn
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
nn
dz
Z
k
snp
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
np
dz Z
k
snn
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
nn
dz
Z
k
snn
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
nn
dz Z
k
s
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
k
dz
and
k
=
k
(z) is the mass density of layer k. Using the same law-of-mixtures adopted for the Youngs
modulus and Poissons ratio, the mass density is assumed to have the following variation through the
thickness
k
(z) =
k
bot
+
_
k
top
k
bot
_
V
k
f
(z) (16)
6
where
k
bot
and
k
top
denote the mass density of the bottom and top surface of layer k, respectively, and
V
f
(z) is the volume fraction given by Eq. (8).
2.5. Ritz expansion
According to the standard Ritz approach, the components of each displacement unknown u
k
(, ) are
expanded through series of admissible functions as follows
u
k
(, ) = N
i
(, )c
k
i
(i = 1, 2, . . . , M) (17)
in which
N
i
(, ) = diag (N
ui
, N
vi
, N
wi
) , c
k
i
=
_
_
c
k
ui
c
k
vi
c
k
wi
_
_
(18)
where M is the order of the Ritz expansion, c
k
ui
, c
k
vi
and c
k
wi
are unknown coecients, N
ui
(, ), N
vi
(, )
and N
wi
(, ) are the corresponding geometrically-compliant layer-independent trial functions, and i is the
Ritz-related index. Note that the summation convention over the repeated Ritz-related index i is implied
in Eq. (17). The i-th admissible function N
i
( = u, v, w) is selected here as
N
i
(, ) = f
()p
m
()g
()p
n
() (m, n = 1, 2, . . . , P) (19)
where f() and g() are boundary functions corresponding to the type of boundary conditions along and ,
respectively, p
l
() = cos [(l 1) arccos()] (l = m, n; = , ) is the one-dimensional Chebyshev polynomial
along direction, and P is the order of expansion in each direction. Note that the order M of the Ritz
expansion is given by M = P
2
and the indices i, m, and n are related by the expression i = P(m1) + n.
For further details on the Ritz admissible set, also see [32].
2.6. Ritz fundamental nuclei
After substituting Eq. (17) into Eqs. (14) and (15), the potential and kinetic energy of the plate can be
written as a summation of layer contributions as follows:
U
max
=
1
2
N
l
k=1
c
k
i
T
K
k
sij
c
k
sj
(20)
T
max
=
1
2
2
N
l
k=1
c
k
i
T
M
k
sij
c
k
sj
(21)
where K
k
sij
and M
k
sij
are 33 matrices representing the Ritz fundamental nuclei of the formulation. After
indicating the in-plane integrals as follows
I
ij
mm
=
_
+1
1
d
i
d
i
[f
()p
m
()]
d
j
d
j
[f
s
()p
m
()] d m, m = 1, 2, . . . , P
7
J
ij
nn
=
_
+1
1
d
i
d
i
[g
()p
n
()]
d
j
d
j
[g
s
()p
n
()] d n, n = 1, 2, . . . , P
and the thickness integrals as follows
Z
k
sij
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
ij
dz Z
k
sij
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
ij
dz
Z
k
sij
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
ij
dz Z
k
sij
=
_
h
k
F
F
s
C
k
ij
dz
the nine terms of the Ritz stiness nucleus can be explicitly written as
K
k
sij
(1, 1) = Z
k
s11
b
a
I
11
umum
J
00
unun
+ Z
k
s66
a
b
I
00
umum
J
11
unun
+ Z
k
s55
ab
4
I
00
umum
J
00
unun
K
k
sij
(1, 2) = Z
k
s12
I
10
umvm
J
01
unvn
+ Z
k
s66
I
01
umvm
J
10
unvn
K
k
sij
(1, 3) = Z
k
s13
b
2
I
10
umwm
J
00
unwn
+ Z
k
s55
b
2
I
01
umwm
J
00
unwn
K
k
sij
(2, 1) = Z
k
s12
I
01
vmum
J
10
vnun
+ Z
k
s66
I
10
vmum
J
01
vnun
K
k
sij
(2, 2) = Z
k
s66
b
a
I
11
vmvm
J
00
vnvn
+ Z
k
s22
a
b
I
00
vmvm
J
11
vnvn
+ Z
k
s44
ab
4
I
00
vmvm
J
00
vnvn
K
k
sij
(2, 3) = Z
k
s23
a
2
I
00
vmwm
J
10
vnwn
+ Z
k
s44
a
2
I
00
vmwm
J
01
vnwn
K
k
sij
(3, 1) = Z
k
s55
b
2
I
10
wmum
J
00
wnun
+ Z
k
s13
b
2
I
01
wmum
J
00
wnun
K
k
sij
(3, 2) = Z
k
s44
a
2
I
00
wmvm
J
10
wnvn
+ Z
k
s23
a
2
I
00
wmvm
J
01
wnvn
K
k
sij
(3, 3) = Z
k
s55
b
a
I
11
wmwm
J
00
wnwn
+ Z
k
s44
a
b
I
00
wmwm
J
11
wnwn
+ Z
k
s33
ab
4
I
00
wmwm
J
00
wnwn
(22)
The explicit expression of the non-null terms of the Ritz mass nucleus are given below:
M
k
sij
(1, 1) = Z
k
s
ab
4
I
00
umum
J
00
unun
M
k
sij
(2, 2) = Z
k
s
ab
4
I
00
vmvm
J
00
vnvn
M
k
sij
(3, 3) = Z
k
s
ab
4
I
00
wmwm
J
00
wnwn
(23)
2.7. The eigenvalue problem
Once computed Eq. (22) and (23) by evaluating both the in-plane and thickness integrals by Gauss
quadrature, the fundamental nuclei are expanded at a layer level through variation of the theory-related
indices and s. Resulting layer-level matrices K
k
ij
and M
k
ij
are then assembled from layer to multilayer
level by enforcing the interlaminar continuity condition [32]. Finally, the plate stiness and mass matrices
K and M are obtained by expanding the multilayer matrices through variation of the Ritz-related indices i
and j, following the same procedure used for the nuclei-to-layer expansion. Square matrices K and M have
dimension [3(N + 1)N
l
3(N
l
1)]M for a given LDN theory and a M-term Ritz expansion.
By minimizing the energy functional = U
max
T
max
with respect to the vector of coecients c
k
i
, a
standard generalized eigenvalue problem is obtained:
_
K
2
M
c = 0 (24)
8
where c is the vector collecting the unknown Ritz coecients c
k
sj
.
2.8. Specialization for a class of ESL 2-D theories
In the case of shear and normal deformation ESL theories, since the displacement unknowns are the same
for each layer, the superscript k in Eq. (9) is dropped and global thickness functions F
(, )e
jt
(25)
in which = 0, . . . , N is the theory-related index. Related ESL theories will be shortly denoted by the
acronym EDN, where N denotes the order of the kinematic model [31]. The total number of displacement
variables of a EDN theory is independent of the number of layers and is given by 3(N + 1).
Dierently from the layerwise case, multilayer matrices of EDN models are obtained by simply summing
up the layer-level matrices K
k
ij
and M
k
ij
over the number of thickness layers [32]. The nal plate square
matrices of dimensions 3M(N + 1) are obtained by varying the Ritz-related indices i and j from 1 to M in
the same way as the corresponding layerwise-based matrices.
3. Numerical analysis
3.1. Convergence properties
It is well known that the Ritz method based on a mathematically complete set of admissible functions
such as in Eq. (17) can provide arbitrarily accurate solutions as the number of terms M in the expansion
approaches innity. Since the series is truncated to a nite value in practical computations, the accuracy of
the Ritz solution for a given problem is related to the rate of convergence associated with the selection of
trial functions. Therefore, it is important to study the convergence properties of the present approach.
The convergence analysis is carried out on a plate reference example. Similar behavior, not shown here for
brevity, is observed in other cases. A square sandwich plate with two homogeneous skins of equal thickness
0.1h embedding a FGM core of thickness 0.8h is considered (see Figure 2). The bottom skin is made up of
alumina (Al
2
O
3
) with the following material properties: E
C
= 380 GPa,
C
= 3800 kg/m
3
,
C
= 0.3. The
top skin is made up of aluminum (Al) with E
M
= 70 GPa,
M
= 2707 kg/m
3
, and
M
= 0.3. Therefore, the
core is ceramic-rich at the bottom face and metal-rich at the top face.
Table 1 presents the rst ve non-dimensional frequency parameters =
_
b
2
/h
_ _
0
/E
0
, with
0
= 1
kg/m
3
and E
0
= 1 GPa, for a simply-supported (SSSS) plate having thickness-to-length ratio h/b = 0.01
and volume fraction index value = 1. Results are computed for increasing values of order P used in the
Ritz expansion along each in-plane direction when a third-order equivalent single-layer (ED3) and layerwise
(LD3) theory are assumed for the kinematics description of the plate mechanical behavior. It is conrmed
9
that, as any Ritz-based frequency solution, convergence of the method is monotonic form above, i.e., the
approximate eigenvalue calculated with a P + 1-term series is always lower, or at least not higher, than
the corresponding eigenvalue calculated with a P-term series. The rate of convergence is very similar for
ED3 and LD3 theories and is relatively high. Indeed, all the rst ve frequency parameters converged to
ve-digit upper bound values when P = 10. Note also that Ritz solutions corresponding to the advanced
layerwise model are only slightly dierent compared to results arising from the ESL kinematic model. This
is related to the thinness of the plate.
The same sandwich FGM plate with thickness-to-length ratio h/b = 0.2 and volume fraction exponent
= 10 is considered in Table 2. Now, frequency parameters are reported for all edges simply-supported
(SSSS) and all edges clamped (CCCC). Referring rst to the SSSS case, it is observed that the convergence
rate is even slightly faster than for the previous thin plate example and is not aected by the through-the-
thickness volume fraction prole. Note also that results computed using the same Ritz order P are found
to be dierent to a small degree according to the adopted kinematic theory. This is also true for the fully-
clamped case. As shown later, the accuracy of upper-bound frequency solutions of thick plates is sensitive
to the plate theory, in particular when higher frequency modes are of interest. As a nal remark, it should
be noted that the rate of convergence of the method deteriorates when clamped boundary conditions are
considered. It appears that the reason for such behavior should be associated with the high displacement
gradients of the mode shapes near the plate edges and the related diculty in their approximation using
global Ritz functions of relatively low order [31, 32].
3.2. Validation on SSSS and CCCC plates
The variable-kinematic Ritz formulation derived in this work for sandwich plates with FGM layers is here
validated by comparison with three case studies available in the literature. In all the following examples,
present results are computed using a Ritz series with P = 10 terms along and directions.
First, a single-layer FGM plate with simply-supported edges is considered. The geometric properties are
a = b = 0.4 m, h = 0.005 m. The constituent materials of the plate are Titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V and
Aluminum oxide with the following material properties:
Titanium alloy (Ti 6Al 4V) : E
M
= 105.7 GPa,
M
= 4429 kg/m
3
,
M
= 0.298
Aluminum oxide : E
C
= 320.2 GPa,
C
= 3750 kg/m
3
,
C
= 0.26
Two values of the volume fraction exponent of the metal-ceramic graded plate are considered. Table 3
shows a comparison of the rst ten natural frequencies derived using the approach proposed here with
those reported by Zhao et al. [13] and He et al. [33]. The present solutions are based on ED2 and ED4
equivalent single-layer theories. It can be seen that the vibration frequencies are in good agreement with
results presented by Zhao et al. [13], expect for the two highest modes where little discrepancy is observed.
Good correlation is also obtained with solutions showed by He et al. [33].
10
As a second example, the square sandwich plate with Al
2
O
3
/Al graded core previously introduced
in the convergence analysis is considered. Thin (h/b = 0.01), moderately thick (h/b = 0.1) and thick
(h/b = 0.2) plates with fully simply-supported and fully clamped edges are now analyzed. The fundamental
non-dimensional frequency parameter =
_
b
2
/h
_ _
0
/E
0
, with
0
= 1 kg/m
3
and E
0
= 1 GPa, is shown
in Table 4 for values of the volume fraction index = 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10. Present results are reported using ED2
and LD3 theories and compared with frequency solutions obtained by a three-dimensional Ritz approach
in [24]. It is observed that upper-bound frequency parameters computed using 2-D theories are all in excellent
agreement with 3-D values for thin plates. The accuracy is slightly worse for moderately thick plates when
the second-order ESL theory is adopted. When thicker plates are studied, the discrepancy between 2-D
approximations and three-dimensional analysis can be limited to a small degree only using a layerwise
model. Note also that the above conclusions are found to be valid irrespective of the through-the-thickness
power-law variation of the material properties and the boundary conditions.
The last validation example refers to a square thick (h/b = 0.25) sandwich plate having two homogeneous
skins of equal thickness 0.1h embedding an Al/Al
2
O
3
graded core of thickness 0.8h. In this case, the top
skin is made of ceramic material and the bottom skin is made of aluminum. The plate is considered to
be simply-supported. The rst ve non-dimensional frequencies =
_
b
2
/h
_ _
0
/E
0
corresponding to the
fundamental vibration mode with one half wavelength along each in-plane direction are shown in Table 5.
Ritz-based solutions for = 5, 10 are listed using ED4, LD3 and LD4 theories and compared with analytical
solutions computed by Cinefra and Soave [27] using the classical lamination theory (CLT), the rst-order
shear deformation theory (FSDT) and a fourth-order layerwise theory. Since CLT relies on three kinematic
variables, only three corresponding natural frequencies are obtained. It is shown that approximate values
derived using the present approach are in excellent agreement with the analytical solutions. It is also
observed that accurate estimation of higher-order modes of thick plates requires the adoption of rened
kinematic models.
3.3. Results with other boundary conditions
To the best authors knowledge, accurate frequency parameters for FGM sandwich plates with boundary
conditions other than fully simply-supported and fully clamped are not available in the literature. Based
on the convergence analysis and validation study presented before, some illustrative numerical results are
given for rectangular plates (a/b = 2) with homogeneous skins of thickness 0.1h and Al/Al
2
O
3
graded
core. Tabulated values are computed using a fourth-order layerwise theory (LD4) and thus are considered
to be highly accurate. In Tables 6 and 7, the rst 20 eigenfrequency parameters
i
(i = 1, 2, . . . , 20) of
plates with SCSC and CFFF boundary conditions are provided, respectively, for three dierent values of
volume fraction index ( = 1, 5, 10) and three dierent thickness-to-length ratios (h/b = 0.01, 0.1, 0.25)
corresponding to thin, moderately thick and thick plates. Results are obtained using 10 10 terms of the
11
Chebyshev polynomials. It is seen that, irrespective of the boundary conditions and thickness-to-length
ratio, the natural frequencies decreases with increasing the volume fraction index . This is expected since
the core has a smaller ceramic component when gets larger and thus the sandwich plate has an overall
reduced stiness. Note that this trend is smoother for high values of the volume fraction exponent, especially
when thin plates are considered. In this case, the natural frequencies of the rst modes for both SCSC and
CFFF plates are in practice unaected when > 5. It is also observed that the frequency parameters of
plates with SCSC boundary conditions are all higher than the corresponding values of cantilever plates.
This is due to the higher constraints introduced at boundaries in the rst case. As expected, the natural
frequencies decrease as the thickness-to-length ratio h/b increases. However, it is worth noting that the
variation of the fundamental mode of CFFF plates with respect to h/b is very low. Finally, it is noted that
for thicker plates the eigenfrequencies tend to crowd together with increasing the mode number.
4. Conclusions
In this paper, a unied Ritz method based on two classes of advanced 2-D kinematic models is proposed
for accurate evaluation of natural frequencies of thick and thin FGM sandwich plates with various boundary
conditions. In particular, numerical results are presented for sandwich plates with homogeneous skins and
FGM core. The formulation has attractive invariant properties since many higher-order equivalent single-
layer and layerwise plate theories can be adopted without the need of new mathematical development for each
dierent kinematic approach. Furthermore, accurate upper-bound frequency solutions, even for very thick
plates, can be obtained for arbitrary combination of boundary conditions using computationally ecient
2-D models.
It is found that the rate of convergence of the method is not substantially aected by the kinematic
theory and the through-the-thickness volume fraction prole. Using Chebyshev polynomials as admissible
functions, well-converged solutions are obtained when 10 terms along each in-plane direction are retained
in the Ritz series expansion. Comparisons with reference values available in the literature show that the
present technique is capable of providing very accurate results also when relatively high wavenumbers are
of interest. In this case, layerwise approaches are found to be mandatory for condent prediction of the
vibration behavior. The rst 20 eigenfrequency parameters for two illustrative examples with SCSC and
CFFF boundary conditions are also presented for the rst time. The eects of material variation and
thickness-to-length ratio on the frequency characteristics are discussed. Tabulated values are shown using
a rened fourth-order layerwise theory and are considered to represent valuable reference data for future
comparison studies.
12
References
[1] G.N. Praveen, J.N. Reddy, Nonlinear transient thermoelastic analysis of functionally graded ceramic-metal plates, Inter-
national Journal of Solids and Structures, 35 (1998), 4457-4476.
[2] C.T. Loy, K.Y. Lam, J.N. Reddy, Vibration of functionally graded cylindrical shells, International Journal of Mechanical
Sciences, 41 (1999), 309-324.
[3] Z.Q. Cheng, R.C. Batra, Exact correspondence between eigenvalues of membranes and functionally graded simply sup-
ported polygonal plates, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 229 (2000), 879-895.
[4] S.S. Vel, R.C. Batra, Three-dimensional exact solution for the vibration of functionally graded rectangular plates, Journal
of Sound and Vibration, 272 (2004), 703-730.
[5] L.F. Qian, R.C. Batra, L.M. Chen, Static and dynamic deformations of thick functionally graded elastic plate by using
higher-order shear and normal deformable plate theory and meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method, Composites: Part
B, 35 (2004), 685-697.
[6] R.C. Batra, J. Jin, Natural frequencies of a functionally graded anisotropic rectangular plate, Journal of Sound and
Vibration, 282 (2005), 509-516.
[7] A.J.M. Ferreira, R.C. Batra, C.M.C. Roque, L.F. Qian, R.M.N. Jorge, Natural frequencies of functionally graded plates
by a meshless method, Composite Structures, 75 (2006), 593-600.
[8] C.M.C. Roque, A.J.M. Ferreira, R.M.N. Jorge, A radial basis function approach for the free vibration analysis of func-
tionally graded plates using a rened theory, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 300 (2007), 1048-1070.
[9] E. Efraim, M. Eisenberger, Exact vibration analysis of variable thickness thick annular isotropic and FGM plates, Journal
of Sound and Vibration, 299 (2007), 720-738.
[10] G.J. Nie, Z. Zhong, Semi-analytical solution for three-dimensional vibration of functionally graded circular plates, Com-
puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196 (2007), 4901-4910.
[11] C.Y. Dong, Three-dimensional free vibration analysis of functionally graded annular plates using the ChebyshevRitz
method, Materials and Design, 29 (2008), 1518-1525.
[12] H. Matsunaga, Free vibration and stability of functionally graded plates according to a 2-D higher-order deformation
theory, Composite Structures, 82 (2008), 499-512.
[13] X. Zhao, Y.Y. Lee, K.M. Liew, Free vibration analysis of functionally graded plates using the element-free kp-Ritz
method, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 319 (2009), 918-939.
[14] P. Malekzadeh, A. Alibeygi Beni, Free vibration of functionally graded arbitrary straight-sided quadrilateral plates in
thermal environment, Composite Structures, 92 (2010), 2758-2767.
[15] D.Y. Liu, C.Y. Wang, W.Q. Chen, Free vibration of FGM plates with in-plane material inhomogeneity, Composite
Structures, 92 (2010), 1047-1051.
[16] Sh. Hosseini-Hashemi, M. Fadaee, S.R. Atashipour, Study on the free vibration of thick functionally graded rectangular
plates according to a new exact closed-form procedure, Composite Structures, 93 (2011), 722-735.
[17] A. Hasani Baferani, A.R. Saidi, H. Ehteshami, Accurate solution for free vibration analysis of functionally graded thick
rectangular plates resting on elastic foundation, Composite Structures, 93 (2011), 1842-1853.
[18] Ping Zhu, K.M. Liew, Free vibration analysis of moderately thick functionally graded plates by local Kriging meshless
method, Composite Structures, 93 (2011), 2925-2944.
[19] P. Shi, C.Y. Dong, Vibration analysis of functionally graded annular plates with mixed boundary conditions in thermal
environment, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 331 (2012), 3649-3662.
[20] A.M.A. Neves, A.J.M. Ferreira, E. Carrera, C.M.C. Roque, M. Cinefra, R.M.N. Jorge, C.M.M. Soares, A quasi-3D
sinusoidal shear deformation theory for the static and free vibration analysis of functionally graded plates, Composites
Part B: Engineering, 43 (2012), 711-725.
13
[21] A.M.A. Neves, A.J.M. Ferreira, E. Carrera, M. Cinefra, C.M.C. Roque, R.M.N. Jorge, C.M.M. Soares, A quasi-3D
hyperbolic shear deformation theory for the static and free vibration analysis of functionally graded plates, Composites
Structures, 94 (2012), 1814-1825.
[22] A.M. Zenkour, A comprehensive analysis of functionally graded sandwich plates: Part 2 - Buckling and free vibration,
International Journal of Solids and Structures, 42 (2005), 5243-5258.
[23] R.K. Bhangale, N. Ganesan, Free vibration of simply supported functionally graded and layered magneto-electro-elastic
plates by nite element method, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 294 (2006), 1016-1038.
[24] Q. Li, V.P. Iu, K.P. Kou, Three-dimensional vibration analysis of functionally graded material sandwich plates, Journal
of Sound and Vibration, 311 (2008), 498-515.
[25] N.E. Meiche, A. Tounsi, N. Ziane, I. Mechab, E.A. Adda Bedia, A new hyperbolic shear deformation theory for buckling
and vibration of functionally graded sandwich plate, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 53 (2011), 237-247.
[26] L. Hadji, H.A. Atmane, A. Tounsi, I. Mechab, E.A. Adda Bedia, Free vibration of functionally graded sandwich plates
using four-variable rened plate theory, Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 32 (2011), 925-942.
[27] M. Cinefra, M. Soave, Accurate vibration analysis of multilayered plates made of functionally graded materials, Mechanics
of Advanced Materials and Structures, 18 (2011), 3-13.
[28] E. Carrera, S. Brischetto, A. Robaldo, Variable kinematic model for the analysis of functionally graded material plates,
AIAA Journal, 46 (2008), 194-203.
[29] A.M.A. Neves, A.J.M. Ferreira, E. Carrera, M. Cinefra, C.M.C. Roque, R.M.N. Jorge, C.M.M. Soares,
Static, free vibration and buckling analysis of isotropic and sandwich functionally graded plates using a
quasi-3D higher-order shear deformation theory and a meshless technique, Composites Part B: Engineering,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.089.
[30] E. Carrera, Theories and nite elements for multilayered, anisotropic, composite plates and shells, Archives of Compu-
tational Methods in Engineering, 9 (2002), 87-140.
[31] L. Dozio, E. Carrera, A variable kinematic Ritz formulation for vibration study of quadrilateral plates with arbitrary
thickness, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 330 (2011), 4611-4632.
[32] L. Dozio, E. Carrera, Ritz analysis of vibrating rectangular and skew multilayered plates based on advanced variable-
kinematic models, Composite Structures, 94 (2012), 2118-2128.
[33] X.Q. He, T.Y. Ng, S. Sivashanker, K.M. Liew, Active control of FGM plates with integrated piezoelectric sensors and
actuators, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 38 (2001), 1641-1655.
14
Table 1: Convergence study of a square, simply-supported, thin (h/b = 0.01) sandwich plate with FGM core ( = 1).
Mode
Theory P 1 2 3 4 5
ED3 6 1.38669 3.47578 3.47578 5.55743 7.03187
8 1.38669 3.46525 3.46525 5.54195 6.92683
10 1.38669 3.46521 3.46521 5.54189 6.92534
12 1.38669 3.46521 3.46521 5.54189 6.92533
LD3 6 1.38669 3.47578 3.47578 5.55743 7.03186
8 1.38669 3.46525 3.46525 5.54195 6.92682
10 1.38669 3.46521 3.46521 5.54189 6.92533
12 1.38669 3.46520 3.46520 5.54189 6.92532
Table 2: Convergence study of a square thick (h/b = 0.2) sandwich plate with FGM core ( = 10) and dierent boundary
conditions.
Mode
BCs Theory P 1 2 3 4 5
SSSS ED3 8 1.44609 2.92730 2.92730 3.24052 3.24052
10 1.44609 2.92730 2.92730 3.24049 3.24049
12 1.44609 2.92730 2.92730 3.24049 3.24049
LD3 8 1.44551 2.92722 2.92722 3.23766 3.23766
10 1.44551 2.92722 2.92722 3.23763 3.23763
12 1.44551 2.92722 2.92722 3.23763 3.23763
CCCC ED3 6 2.29919 4.09486 4.09486 5.54284 5.63046
8 2.29469 4.08986 4.08986 5.53719 5.62739
10 2.29347 4.08849 4.08849 5.53577 5.62654
11 2.29326 4.08829 4.08829 5.53558 5.62643
12 2.29318 4.08820 4.08820 5.53549 5.62616
LD3 6 2.29636 4.08729 4.08729 5.53086 5.62966
8 2.29120 4.08098 4.08098 5.52345 5.62620
10 2.28926 4.07834 4.07834 5.52043 5.62492
11 2.28868 4.07762 4.07762 5.51963 5.62452
12 2.28835 4.07702 4.07702 5.51893 5.62426
15
Table 3: Comparison of the natural frequencies (Hz) for square SSSS single-layer FGM plates.
Mode
Theory 1 2,3 4 5,6 7,8 9,10
0 ED2 144.97 362.15 579.02 723.42 939.76 1229.3
ED4 144.96 362.11 578.90 723.23 939.44 1228.7
Zhao et al. [13] 143.67 360.64 575.87 725.53 938.18 1238.8
He et al. [33] 144.66 360.53 569.89 720.57 919.74 1225.7
2000 ED2 271.03 677.09 1082.6 1352.6 1757.1 2298.4
ED4 271.01 677.00 1082.3 1352.2 1756.5 2297.4
Zhao et al. [13] 268.60 674.38 1076.8 1356.9 1754.4 2316.9
He et al. [33] 268.92 669.40 1052.5 1338.5 1695.2 2280.9
Table 4: Comparison of the fundamental frequency parameter =
`
b
2
/h
p
0
/E
0
of fully simply-supported and clamped
square sandwich plates with Al
2
O
3
/Al graded core.
0
/E
0
corresponding to the fundamental vibration
mode of SSSS sandwich plates with a/b = 1, h/b = 0.25 and Al/Al
2
O
3
graded core.
Mode
Theory 1 2 3 4 5
5 LD4 [27] 1.0357 2.3620 3.8287 5.8725 6.8237
LD4 1.0357 2.3621 3.8288 5.8725 6.8237
LD3 1.0362 2.3621 3.8299 5.9363 6.9163
ED4 1.0365 2.3628 3.8323 5.8887 6.9316
FSDT [27] 1.0628 2.3762 3.9546 7.2248 8.3316
CLT [27] 1.1955 2.4159 4.1396
10 LD4 [27] 1.0095 2.2269 3.6058 5.5612 6.5135
LD4 1.0095 2.2269 3.6059 5.5612 6.5136
LD3 1.0103 2.2278 3.6098 5.5661 6.5411
ED4 1.0123 2.2283 3.6122 5.5965 6.5445
FSDT [27] 1.0484 2.2408 3.7331 6.8148 7.9046
CLT [27] 1.1951 2.2765 3.8992
Table 6: First 20 eigenfrequency parameters
i
=
`
i
b
2
/h
p
0
/E
0
of sandwich plates with FGM Al/Al
2
O
3
core, aspect ratio
a/b = 2 and SCSC boundary conditions.
h/b = 0.01 h/b = 0.1 h/b = 0.25
Mode = 1 = 5 = 10 = 1 = 5 = 10 = 1 = 5 = 10
1 1.6818 1.5459 1.5452 1.5875 1.4155 1.3957 1.2752 1.0576 1.0104
2 2.0420 1.8768 1.8760 1.9137 1.7031 1.6783 1.5211 1.2661 1.2123
3 2.7529 2.5300 2.5289 2.5567 2.2700 2.2355 2.0046 1.6689 1.5918
4 3.8535 3.5413 3.5396 3.5291 3.1185 3.0658 2.0402 1.6892 1.5981
5 4.4802 4.1163 4.1139 3.9752 3.4568 3.3722 2.6141 2.1554 2.0311
6 4.8862 4.4890 4.4863 4.3075 3.7411 3.6483 2.6891 2.2220 2.0963
7 5.3475 4.9135 4.9109 4.7986 4.2095 4.0171 2.7667 2.2251 2.1188
8 5.6006 5.1450 5.1417 4.8903 4.2394 4.1261 2.9897 2.4135 2.2766
9 6.6576 6.1153 6.1111 5.1200 4.2632 4.1322 3.3755 2.7317 2.5774
10 7.9949 7.3438 7.3389 5.7405 4.9628 4.8327 3.3924 2.7797 2.6198
11 8.0834 7.4240 7.4186 6.5726 5.4689 5.1530 3.5115 2.8705 2.7204
12 8.6692 7.9601 7.9533 6.8581 5.9048 5.7407 3.5758 2.9226 2.7563
13 9.1004 8.3556 8.3482 6.8821 5.9503 5.7950 3.7968 3.0928 2.9151
14 9.8363 9.0305 9.0223 7.1563 6.0882 5.8844 3.9174 3.1675 2.9842
15 10.569 9.7041 9.6958 7.4710 6.3506 6.1367 4.0214 3.2682 3.0860
16 10.897 10.003 9.9937 8.0076 6.7988 6.5675 4.0656 3.3034 3.1187
17 11.106 10.198 10.190 8.5309 7.0898 6.6803 4.4648 3.5951 3.3657
18 12.305 11.294 11.283 8.6768 7.4031 7.0652 4.5033 3.6098 3.4080
19 13.570 12.455 12.443 8.7735 7.4363 7.1675 4.5924 3.6993 3.4750
20 14.217 13.045 13.030 9.0255 7.4980 7.1787 4.6726 3.7538 3.5140
17
Table 7: First 20 eigenfrequency parameters
i
=
`
i
b
2
/h
p
0
/E
0
of sandwich plates with FGM Al/Al
2
O
3
core, aspect ratio
a/b = 2 and CFFF boundary conditions.
h/b = 0.01 h/b = 0.1 h/b = 0.25
Mode = 1 = 5 = 10 = 1 = 5 = 10 = 1 = 5 = 10
1 0.0603 0.0557 0.0557 0.0603 0.0554 0.0554 0.0596 0.0545 0.0543
2 0.2603 0.2393 0.2392 0.2509 0.2279 0.2268 0.2201 0.1849 0.1761
3 0.3778 0.3473 0.3472 0.3726 0.3405 0.3396 0.2381 0.2092 0.2036
4 0.8475 0.7789 0.7785 0.5734 0.4784 0.4508 0.3510 0.3128 0.3087
5 1.0599 0.9744 0.9741 0.8109 0.7338 0.7289 0.7111 0.6175 0.6036
6 1.6279 1.4961 1.4954 1.0284 0.9327 0.9271 0.8310 0.6927 0.6531
7 1.6353 1.5033 1.5028 1.5372 1.3823 1.3695 0.8748 0.7320 0.6910
8 2.0859 1.9173 1.9166 1.5713 1.4253 1.4185 0.9105 0.7910 0.7718
9 2.2307 2.0502 2.0493 1.9728 1.7265 1.6305 1.2848 1.0997 1.0689
10 2.6886 2.4708 2.4696 2.0752 1.7790 1.7136 1.3502 1.1802 1.1609
11 3.1446 2.8894 2.8878 2.0983 1.8184 1.7583 1.6202 1.3780 1.3348
12 3.5041 3.2204 3.2190 2.1813 1.8819 1.8644 1.7113 1.4633 1.4203
13 4.0668 3.7368 3.7348 2.4934 2.2242 2.1964 1.8160 1.5048 1.4250
14 4.3666 4.0117 4.0093 2.8738 2.5581 2.5254 1.9728 1.6633 1.6023
15 4.3886 4.0333 4.0316 3.2320 2.8703 2.8287 2.2131 1.8605 1.7981
16 4.8886 4.4920 4.4895 3.6801 3.2536 3.2014 2.3274 1.9267 1.8162
17 5.2774 4.7758 4.5005 3.9055 3.4458 3.3892 2.3914 1.9725 1.8680
18 5.7291 4.8492 4.8466 4.0145 3.5745 3.5302 2.5039 2.0968 2.0001
19 5.7826 5.3120 5.3086 4.3960 3.7857 3.5763 2.7249 2.2579 2.1637
20 5.8797 5.4010 5.3974 4.5634 3.9104 3.8481 2.8553 2.3597 2.2289
18
Figure 1: Plate geometry
Figure 2: A sandwich plate with homogeneous skins and Al
2
O
3
/Al graded core.
19