Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Rup
Bezup
Engine crankshaft, dynamically coupled with 5 radial bearings and 1 axial bearing The geometry of the crankshaft (web shape) is defined and parameterised by ProEngineer 10 geometric variables, that are assigned to the web side (Bezier curves) and to fillet radius
The first natural frequency is computed by ANSYS Workbench (~150 Hz with freefree BC)
AVL-Autoshaft
AVL-Excite
The crankshaft is discretized by finite volumes: the equivalent model of mass point is computed AVL-Excite uses this model to calculate the forces (inertial, active and reactive) acting on the crankshaft and in particular in correspondence of the bearings
The equivalent model of crankshaft is coupled with the bearings The general data (bearing type, friction coefficients, oil pressure and viscosity, roughness and clearance, etc.) are specified
The fitness of the bearings is quantified by the evaluation of three functions, calculated by a notstationary hydrodynamic analysis of the bearings in a complete cycle The complete cycle analysis is required since the contact point (and thus risk of damage) in the bearing is not fixed during a cycle
Oil film pressure is considered as deterministic variable [110bar] 10 geometric deterministic variables (web shape) Bearing clearance and roughness are stochastic variables (due to manifacturing tolerances): defined by a fixed mean value and a standard deviation
Obj.1: minimize crankshaft mass (DETERMINISTIC) Obj.2: maximize first natural mode frequency (DETERMINISTIC) Obj.3: minimize mean of maximum oil film pressure (STOCHASTIC) Obj.4 minimize mean of oil film power loss (STOCHASTIC) Obj.5 maximize mean of oil film thickness (STOCHASTIC) Constr. on standard deviation of oil film pressure, loss and thickness to be lower than original (STOCHASTIC)
Design parameters Input variables 10 geometric var for crankshaft, oil pressure, 10 stochastic var for bearings Output variables Mass, frequency, oil film power loss, pressure and thickness
Design goals Minimize mass, mean of power loss and pressure Maximize frequency and mean of thickness Optimizations set-up data Sampling phase: Original configuration nr initial individuals: 1 Exploration phase: MOGT scheduler 6 Simplex iterations for 4 players steps
Constraints Standard deviation of oil film output variables less than original
modeFRONTIER post-processing
46 designs of the total 180 computed by MOGT belong to Pareto front (not-dominated)
modeFRONTIER post-processing
Pareto front designs are compared relatively to the 5 objectives Original and best design 156 (arbirary chosen) are indicated in green
modeFRONTIER post-processing
original
best
objective
constraint
Mean film Mean loss pressure [bar] film thickness [mm]
Frequency
[Hz]
thickness [mm]
1.174E-5 1.175E-5
[W]
loss [W]
150 164
79.3 77.0
628 612
6.77 6.77
1.48E-7 1.48E-7
64.3 64.3
modeFRONTIER post-processing
original
best
modeFRONTIER post-processing
Values of clearance for 3 bearings vs power loss: only one bearing indicates a inverse linearity
modeFRONTIER post-processing
Conclusion
The necessity of Robust Design has been clarified by two examples in different fields
The application of Multi Objective Game Theory algorithm has revealed particularly efficient for the solution of these kind of applications