Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Gant Chart
Lists activities and shows their scheduled start, finish and duration. Monitoring a project: indicate the current state of each activity.
Lag time: - A delay between the predecessor event (start or finish) and the successor event (start or finish). - Example: A Finish-to-Start relationship between A and B with a 2 days lag, means B can not start until A has finished for 2 days In this example, FS = 2 days.
Lead time: - The successor event (start or finish) can occur before the predecessor event (start or finish) within a certain time frame. - Example: A Finish-to-Start relationship between A and B with a 2 days lead, means B can not start until it is 2 days before A finishes In this example, FS = - 2 days.
Microsoft Project
10
external events such as adverse weather the time required to gain regulatory approval for projects
may vary tremendously
Simple method 1 Ignoring the uncertainty, and schedule the project using the expected or most likely duration for each activity.
Drawbacks:
Typically results in overly optimistic schedules the use of single activity durations often produces a rigid,
inflexible mindset on the part of schedulers. As a result, field managers may loose confidence in the realism of a schedule based upon fixed activity durations.
12
13
14
PERT (Project Evaluation and Review Technique) PERT is a commonly used formal method for dealing with uncertainty in project scheduling.
Procedure:
16
"pessimistic" (bi,j)
Mean:
Variance:
17
19
20
21
Example 6.2
1. The probability that the project can be completed within 22 weeks:
22
Example 6.2
2. The probability that the project requires more than 28 weeks:
23
Example 6.2
3. The number of weeks required to complete the project with probability 0.90:
24
Use of 95 percentile
Variance:
25
26
Example 6.3
Activity durations estimation
The sum of the means for the critical activities is 4.0 + 8.0 + 12.0 + 6.0 = 30.0 days, and the sum of the variances is 0.4 + 1.6 + 1.6 + 1.6 = 5.2 leading to a standard deviation of 2.3 days.
27
28
29
Procedure:
1. In each iteration, generate a set of activity durations, based on their corresponding duration distributions.
2. Use CPM to compute the project completion time and other scheduling information. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 until the maximum iteration N is reached. Thus, N project completion times can be obtained. 4. Determine the project completion time distribution based on the data obtained in 3.
30
Estimates of the expected time and variance of the project completion. An estimate of the distribution of completion times, so that the probability
of meeting a particular completion date can be estimated.
The probability that a particular activity will lie on the critical path. This is
of interest since the longest or critical path through the network may change as activity durations change.
Monte Carlo simulation is more accurate than PERT Dependency among duration distributions of activities can be modeled.
31
The actual project duration has a mean of 10.5 days, and a standard deviation of 3.5 days.
32
Example 6.5
Nine-activity project:
Run the simulation 500 times. The average project duration is found to be 30.9 days with a
standard deviation of 2.5 days.
33