You are on page 1of 2

#6 Bureau of Internal Revenue COMMISSION OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, vs. AQUAFRESH SEAFOODS, INC., Respondent. G.R. No.

170389 PERALTA, J.: Facts: Aquafresh Seafoods sold two parcels of located at Barrio Banica in Roxas City and paid the corresponding CGT and DST due on the sale. However, the BIR assessed Aquafresh Seafoods based on its conclusion that the lots were classified as commercial and not residential as claimed by the taxpayer. Aquafresh Seafoods defense was that there was already a pre-defined zonal value for the said lots and thus the BIR could not reclassify the same to be commercial lots. Issue: Is the requirement (under Section 6 of the Tax Code) of consultation with competent appraisers both from the public and private sectors in determining fair market value applicable in this case? Ruling: YES. The BIRs position that the requirement of consultation with appraisers is mandatory only when formulating or making changes in the schedule of zonal valu es is wrong. The Court held that the BIRs act of classifying the subject properties involved a re-classification and revision of the prescribed zonal values. It was likewise added that the application of the rule of assigning zonal values based on the predominant use of property only applies when the property is located in an area or zone where the properties are not yet classified and their zonal values are not yet determined. If a determination has already been made, the BIR has no discretion as regards its classification and/or valuation. October 20, 2010