Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
TRANSPARENCY
EFFECTIVENESS
The 2008 Self Certification Plus Compliance Form must be submitted to InterAction by each member organization no later than December 31,
2008. This process is mandatory for all InterAction members every other year and noncompliance will result in suspension from InterAction
membership.
Although compliance with PVO standards is a self-regulatory process, it is an important mechanism for demonstrating the integrity and
accountability of the NGO sector with donors, the public, and beneficiaries and also serves as a track record of members’ internal efforts to
improve organizational accountability.
Year 2006 witnessed the first mandatory year for InterAction members to comply with the PVO Standards by completing the Self-Certification
Plus process. As we begin 2008 and the second mandatory PVO Standards compliance exercise through Self-Certification Plus, we have made the
process more user friendly and have consolidated all the materials into one document. The only changes from 2006 are in sections II.C.2 of
Program Quality and Monitoring and Evaluation and II. E. 1- 5, a new section of Minimum Operating Security Standards. All other sections
remain the same as in the 2006 process.
The actual form which follows is in Microsoft Word table format, with boxes designed in a “word-wrapping” format so that the boxes expand as
you fill them in. For each standard and its related components, the agency must indicate in the third column marked “Compliance” whether or not
the standard and each component of that standard have been met. To check the box, double click on it and a window will open to allow you to
change it to a checked box. Should the agency determine that a program standard does not apply, it must explain (briefly) its reasons for
determining the standard is “not applicable” in that section.
The document explains each standard component and proposes documentation to be gathered and reviewed which provides evidence of
compliance. Sections I.A.1 thorough III.B must be completed fully using the information in columns marked “Component’ and “Proposed
Evidence”. Check the appropriate box in column marked “Compliance” and then either indicate your action plan in column four marked “Action
Plan if not in Compliance” to address noncompliance or indicate the documentation you used as evidence of compliance in column five. Each
member is required to develop and indicate an action plan to address areas of non-conformance. It has always been InterAction’s policy that a
member is given one year to either come into compliance with non-conformance to a standard or to demonstrate concerted movement toward
coming into compliance in order to avoid possible suspension from membership.
The completed form, including the signature page constitutes a completed certification document. We also ask you to complete the questionnaire
to help us evaluate the process.
We will be using the results of the 2008 process to determine necessary revisions for 2010 and encourage you to give your feedback on the exercise
and suggestions for improving the process. If you have any questions or need additional clarification on how to complete the materials, please contact
Barbara Wallace, Vice President of Membership & Standards at 202-667-8227 or bwallace@interaction.org.
The parenthetical term “Source” in these guidelines refers to the current PVO Standard(s) being applied to each standard heading and component under review.
Due to the consolidation, the “Source” standards are not in numeric order.
I.D.2 – The agency shall have Copy of the written policy and
a written policy that affirms its relevant sections of operational plans. Yes, have policy
commitment to gender equity, Yes, but lack policy
to ethnic and racial diversity, Not in compliance
to the inclusion of people with Not applicable
disabilities in organizational
structures and in staff and
board composition. The
policy should be fully
integrated into an
organization’s plans and
operations, with a mechanism
mandated by the CEO for
overseeing implementation.
(Source: § 2.6.1/2/3 and 7.2.1,
7.3.1, 7.4.1)
Note: If an organization
claims exemption under
section 702 of the Civil Rights
Act of 1984, the organization
may consider religion in its
employment practices.
c) The potential to
strengthen the capacities
of vulnerable groups,
typically women,
children, minorities, the
disabled, and the very
poor;
III.A.9 – Staff who is engaged Copies of any policies that address the
in fundraising and public ethical practices expected of staff Yes, have policy
relations shall meet the engaged in fundraising and public Yes, but lack policy
standards of the Association of relations. Not in compliance
Fundraising Professionals and Not applicable
Public Relations Society of
America, respectively.
(Source: § 5.7)
INTERACTION
PVO STANDARDS
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION FORM 2008
SIGNATURE PAGE
Name of Organization
In order to help us structure the process to offer the most benefit to the membership, please answer all of the following
questions.
Name of the organization: _______________________________________________
Did you find the Self-Certification Plus process useful for you institutionally? If yes, please explain how.
Did the process lead to any recognition to strengthen processes, policies and/or systems? If so, please give examples.
Who lead the effort and who where the other individuals and divisions engaged in Self-Certification Plus at your organization?
Do you have any recommendations on how Self-Certification Plus might be improved for 2010?
Did you agree with the assumption that all Category I and Category II Standards are mandatory? If not, which Category I and Category II
Standards would you not consider to be mandatory?
Other Comments