Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
0.80
0.60
0.40
Follow-up, mo
106 61 84 33 78 22 72 17 70 13 70 11 69 10 68 9 65 6 52 4
Figure 1
The appropriate treatment strategy for patients with AF varies from patient to patient and depends on the presence or absence of symptoms and the risk of thromboembolism. For those whose quality of life is signicantly impacted by atrial brillation, options exist to best suit the wants and needs of each patient. Most importantly, a satisfactory decision can be made only when a thorough discussion of every reasonable treatment modality has been discussed. Ultimately, it is the patient who will decide how to proceed with the understanding of the risks and benets of each pathway available.
(a)
(b)
the burden of AF, ablation offers a real opportunity for cure; randomized clinical trials support this nding2 and explain how ablation has become an important option for the symptomatic patient (gure 1). In addition, studies have shown that patients3,4 treated with catheter ablation for AF have fewer hospitalizations as compared to those randomized to drug therapy, thus improving quality of life and decreasing outpatient as well as inpatient visits.5 It is critical to note that ablation is indicated only in patients with symptomatic atrial brillation6 given the current data and recommendations from the Heart Rhythm Society. While patients at relatively low risk for thromboembolism (CHADS 2 score of 1) can be considered for cessation of anticoagulation after a successful ablation for AF, the guidelines do not recommend discontinuation of anticoagulation for those at high risk for stroke. Other non-pharmacological therapies offer alternative options to lifelong anticoagulation.
References:
1
Corley SD, Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, et al. Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Fol- low-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study. Circulation. Mar 30 2004;109(12):1509 1513. Jais P, Cauchemez B, Macle L, et al. Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial brillation: the A4 study. Circulation. Dec 9 2008;118(24):2498 2505.
Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, et al. Comparison of antiarrhyth- mic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial brillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. Jan 27 2010;303(4):333340.
(c)
Figure 1: Freedom from any atrial arrhythmia in patients who have undergone catheter ablation is signicantly reduced as compared to those randomized to anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. From: Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radio frequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmalatrial brillation: a randomized controlled trial. Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, De Paola A, Marchlinski F, Natale A, Macle L, Daoud EG, Calkins H, Hall B, Reddy V, Augello G, Reynolds MR, Vinekar C, Liu CY, Berry SM, Berry DA; ThermoCool AF Trial Investigators. JAMA. 2010 Jan 27;303(4):333-40. Figure 2: (a) and (b) Intracardiac echo (ICE) images of catheters placed in the left atrium and pulmonary veins. ICE utilization has added signicantly to the safety and outcomes with ablations. (c) Illustration showing the position of catheters as demonstrated in (a) and (b) above
Wazni OM, Marrouche NF, Martin DO, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as rst-line treatment of symptom- atic atrial brillation: a randomized trial. JAMA. Jun 1 2005; 293(21):2634 2640. Piccini JP, Lopes RD, Kong MH, Hasselblad V, Jackson K, and AlKhatib SM. Pulmonary Vein Isolation for the Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Atrial Fibrillationf: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009 Dec;2(6):626-33.
6 5
Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm J, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Patient Selection, Procedural Techniques, Patient Management and Follow-up, Denitions, Endpoints, and Research Trial Design. Heart Rhythm, 2012.
W W W. S T L U K E S C A R D I O L O G Y. O R G
NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT NO. 8048 NEW YORK, NY
The Al-Sabah Arrhythmia Institute Andrea Natale, MD Executive Director Conor D. Barrett, MD Director Stephan B. Danik, MD Director, Electrophysiology Lab Robert K. Altman, MD Francesco Santoni, MD Emad Aziz, DO Walter Pierce, MD Erdal Gursoy, MD Sam Hanon, MD Patrick W. Lam, MD Pretty Chawla, MD St. Luke's Hospital 1111 Amsterdam Avenue 5 Babcock New York, NY 10025 Roosevelt Hospital Brodsky Building 425 West 59th Street, Suite 9C New York, NY 10019 Phone: 212.523.2400
This Issue: Atrial Fibrillation: Does Your Patient Have to Live with It?
The Continuum Cardiovascular Centers of New York is pleased to announce the appointments of: Andrea Natale, MD Executive Director of the Al-Sabah Arrhythmia Institute Conor Barrett, MD Director of the Al-Sabah Arrhythmia Institute Stephan Danik, MD Director, Electrophysiology Lab The Al-Sabah Arrhythmia Institute is a state-ofthe-art facility that offers the most advanced and sophisticated arrhythmia care. Funded by His Highness Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, the Amir of Kuwait, the Institute has the capacity to serve more than 3,000 patients annually and is one of the only facilities focused specically on arrhythmia treatments in the New York City metro area.
W W W. S T L U K E S C A R D I O L O G Y. O R G