Assessment of FACTS Requirements on the PSE&G System

Subsynchronous Resonance Mitigation Options for the Pennsylanvia-New Jersey-Maryland Interconnection

TR-106463 Final Report, March 1996

Prepared by GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 1 River Road Schenectady, NY 12345 Principal Contributors: Ann T. Hill Einar V. Larsen Daniel H. Baker PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS 80 Park Plaza Newark, NJ 07101 Principal Contributor: Emile Hyman Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute 3412 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304 EPRI Project Manager Rambabu Adapa

DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES

THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION(S) NAMED BELOW AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED OR COSPONSORED BY THE ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. (EPRI). NEITHER EPRI, ANY MEMBER OF EPRI, ANY COSPONSOR, THE ORGANIZATION(S) BELOW, NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF ANY OF THEM: (A) MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, (I) WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR (II) THAT SUCH USE DOES NOT INFRINGE ON OR INTERFERE WITH PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY PARTY'S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR (III) THAT THIS REPORT IS SUITABLE TO ANY PARTICULAR USER'S CIRCUMSTANCE; OR (B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING ANY CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF EPRI OR ANY EPRI REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES) RESULTING FROM YOUR SELECTION OR USE OF THIS REPORT OR ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT. ORGANIZATION(S) THAT PREPARED THIS REPORT General Electric Company Public Service Electric & Gas

ORDERING INFORMATION
Requests for copies of this report should be directed to the EPRI Distribution Center, 207 Coggins Drive, P.O. Box 23205, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523, (510) 934-4212.
Electric Power Research Institute and EPRI are registered service marks of Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Copyright 1995 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

REPORT SUMMARY
Subsynchronous resonance (SSR) due to nearby generating units and capacitors has limited the application of series capacitors to increase bulk power transfer capability. This report investigated use of thyristor control on a portion of the series capacitor system to mitigate SSR. BACKGROUND The 500-kV Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland (PJM) transmission grid delivers power from a number of jointly-owned PJM generation projects. The operating economies of the PJM pool drive the movement of power from the most economic generation, regardless of location or actual ownership, to the load served. As a result, typically 5000 MW flows from west to east on the PJM system. From 1982-1993, 4200 MVARs of shunt capacitors were added to the PJM system to overcome postcontingency voltage drop constraints that limit transfers. Studies in 1988 and 1989, which ultimately led to the second round of shunt capacitor additions, suggested 50% series compensation for three of the 500-kV lines: Keystone-Juniata, ConemaughJuniata, and Juniata-Alburtis. SSR screening studies identified the potential for SSR at several generators in multiple contingency scenarios of varying severity. Hence, several studies considered thyristor control of series capacitors to prevent this SSR. However, such control for the total series capacitor system significantly raises costs. OBJECTIVES To investigate the benefit of using thyristor control in a portion of a series capacitor system to mitigate SSR. APPROACH The analysis focused on a portion of the 500-kV transmission grid of the PJM Interconnection. The project team performed eigenvalue analysis and time domain simulations for the PJM 50% series compensation application. Simulations modeled the thyristor control algorithm developed for the EPRI-sponsored Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor (TCSC) demonstration at Bonneville Power Administrations (BPA) Slatt Substation, as well as special modulation controls developed by General Electric (GE) after the Slatt installation was completed. The team also explored use of special SSR damping controls. iii

RESULTS Emulating the technology and control algorithms employed in the GE/EPRI TCSC demonstration at BPAs Slatt Substation, this study shows that the SSR threat can be mitigated by using TCSC for 34-44 percent of the total series compensation on the Conemaugh-Juniata line, depending on the degree of conservatism of the TCSC design. Using a novel modulation scheme, the range of TCSC compensation may be reduced to 24-30 percent. A passive filtering technique for SSR mitigation also merits further consideration. EPRI PERSPECTIVE This study demonstrated the use of thyristor control in only a portion of the series capacitor system to mitigate SSR and thus reduce the total cost of the series capacitor installation. FACTS technologies are offering competitive solutions to utilities by enabling increased power transfers, improved system damping, and better system control (see EPRI reports EL-6943 volumes 1-2, TR-100504, TR-101784, TR-101932, TR101933 volumes 1-2, TR-103164, TR-103166, TR-103167, TR-103168, TR-103641, TR103701, and TR-103906). EPRI has planned several FACTS assessment studies and projects to enhance device hardware through Tailored Collaboration with member utilities. INTEREST CATEGORIES FACTS and substations, communication, protection and control Transmission access evaluation Power system operations and control KEYWORDS Power system stability Power system control Power system dynamics Power system planning Flexible AC transmission systems

iv

ABSTRACT
The application of series capacitors has become more common as utilities attempt to increase transfer capability over existing bulk transmission paths. Many series capacitor applications have been limited though by the potential for subsynchronous resonance (SSR) of nearby steam generating units with the series capacitors. This study investigates the benefit of using thyristor control in only a portion of a series capacitor system to mitigate SSR. This analysis utilizes a portion of the 500kV transmission grid of the Pennsylvania-Jersey-Maryland (PJM) Interconnection for this case study. Previous PSE&G studies suggested 50% series capacitor compensation of the KeystoneJuniata, Conemaugh-Junita, and Juniata-Alburtis 500kV lines to improve the prevailing west-to-east PJM power transfer capability. SSR screening studies performed at that time showed potential for SSR at several generators in multiple contingency scenarios. Emulating the technology and control algorithms employed in the GE/EPRI TCSC demonstration at BPAs Slatt Substation, this study shows that the SSR threat could be mitigated by utilizing TCSC for between 34% and 44% of the total series compensation on the Conemaugh-Juniata 500kV line, depending on the degree of conservatism of the TCSC design. Using a novel modulation scheme, the range of TCSC compensation may be reduced to between 24% and 30% of the total series compensation of the Conemaugh-Juniata 500kV line. A passive filtering technique for SSR mitigation is shown to also merit further consideration. Other proposed schemes are enumerated and briefly described.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to PJM for permission to use the engineering data from which this case is drawn, and to Dennis Sobieski and Jim Hebson of PSE&G for making the arrangements. The technical guidance and support provided by Daniel H. Baker of GE for this project is respectfully acknowledged. GE and PSE&G also acknowledge the support for this project provided by EPRI and Ram Adapa.

vii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This simulation study demonstrates the potential for SSR suppression by using thyristor control of only a portion of a series capacitor system. This approach offers the potential of significantly lower equipment cost relative to the cost of using thyristor control of the entire installation. Additionally, adding special modulation to the TCSC control shows promise for further reducing the required size of the thyristor-controlled portion, and therefore total cost. It should be noted that the study case was only one of several contingencies with potential to cause SSR within the study system. Eigenvalue analysis and time simulations, whose results were in essential agreement, were performed for the PJM 50% series compensation application using special simulation tools developed by GE. Simulations modeled the thyristor control algorithm developed for the EPRI-sponsored TCSC demonstration at BPA's Slatt Substation, plus special modulation controls developed by GE after the Slatt installation was completed. Simulation results show that, without thyristor control and approximately 50% compensation of three lines, loss of the Keystone-Conemaugh line with one Conemaugh generator and the Conemaugh-Hunterstown line out of service produced an unstable SSR interaction with the first torsional mode of the Conemaugh HP unit. Thyristor control of only a portion of the Conemaugh-Juniata series compensation using the constant-impedance control scheme of the Slatt installation sufficiently mitigated the potential for SSR within the context of the contingency studied. Simulating a superimposed firing modulation scheme for special SSR damping further increased the effectiveness of the thyristor control. While this study shows a potential for use of special SSR damping controls, adaptation to any of a set of possible contingencies would require further study. It is possible that the usefulness of special controls will depend on the richness of the potential SSR interactions within a particular case or within particular contingencies of that case. The PJM series compensation case, studied here, has illustrated a number of features for SSR suppression by thyristor control. This case provides a useful benchmark for studying candidate control schemes for SSR suppression in highly interconnected systems.

ix

CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................1-1 2 SUBSYNCHRONOUS RESONANCE ISSUES.........................................................2-1 2.1 Analysis Method for SSR Damping.....................................................................2-1 2.2 Transient Torque Analysis Methods ...................................................................2-3 3 CONEMAUGH SSR POTENTIAL WITH CONVENTIONAL SERIES CAPACITORS3-1 4 TCSC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS.........................................................................4-1 4.1 TCSC Operating Characteristics........................................................................4-1 4.2 SSR Damping Characteristics of TCSC..............................................................4-2 4.3 Selection of Nominal Xord ....................................................................................4-3 4.4 Special Considerations at Low Line Current.......................................................4-4 5 TCSC/CONVENTIONAL HYBRID SERIES COMPENSATION ................................5-1 5.1 TCSC Rating Selection .......................................................................................5-1 5.2 Operating Conditions ..........................................................................................5-2 5.3 SSR-Mitigation Performance ..............................................................................5-3 5.4 TCSC/Fixed Series Capacitor Combination ........................................................5-9 5.5 Enhanced SSR Mitigation with Modulation Control ..........................................5-10 6 OTHER MITIGATION METHODS .............................................................................6-1 6.1 Series Capacitor Bypass Filters..........................................................................6-1 6.2 Discussion of Other SSR Countermeasures.......................................................6-5 7 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................7-1 8 REFERENCES ..........................................................................................................8-1 A CONEMAUGH GENERATOR #1 TORSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS.................... A-1 xi

xii

1
INTRODUCTION
PJM, the Pennsylvania-Jersey-Maryland Interconnection, is the world's oldest power pool. Eight member utilities coordinate the planning, operation and maintenance of their own generation and transmission resources, import economy power from external suppliers, and share the benefits of minute-to-minute uniform incremental cost dispatch as though they were a single utility with 46,000 MW peak load. The pool concept allowed PJM utilities to participate in large base load generating stations outside their own service territories where there was advantage to doing so, sharing ownership and risk with one or more partner utilities. Examples include the Keystone and Conemaugh mine-mouth plants in western Pennsylvania, and the Peach Bottom, Salem, and Hope Creek nuclear units in eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey. A 500 kV PJM transmission grid (Figure 1-1) evolved in the past three decades to deliver power from a number of jointly owned PJM generation projects. This grid is multiply connected to adjacent control areas to its south and west. These utilities join with PJM in a regional plan for coordinated operation, and, in turn, interconnect with the ECAR 765 kV system in the Midwest. The operating economies of the PJM pool derive in large measure from the movement of power from the most economic generation, regardless of location or actual ownership, to the load served. As a result, throughout the year, there is a heavy prevailing west-to-east flow on the PJM 500 kV system, amounting to (typically) 5000 MW. From 1982 to 1993, 4200 MVArs of shunt capacitors have been added to the PJM system to overcome post-contingency voltage drop constraints that limit transfers. Studies in 1988-89 [1], which ultimately led to the second round of shunt capacitor additions, suggested 50% series capacitor compensation of three of the 500 kV circuits shown in Figure 1-1: Keystone-Juniata; Conemaugh-Juniata; and Juniata-Alburtis. Subsynchronous resonance (SSR) screening studies, performed as part of the 1988-89 series compensation study, showed potential for SSR at several generators in multiple contingency scenarios of varying severity. A number of application studies have considered thyristor control of series capacitors (TCSC) for preventing SSR. However, thyristor control of the total series capacitor system raises the cost of an installation significantly. Could the SSR prevention objective be achieved with thyristor control of only a portion of the series capacitor installation?

1-1

Introduction

Paralleling a PSE&G study considering the practical limitations and enhancement potential of the PJM 500 kV system, EPRI has funded GE to study thyristor control of a portion of the series capacitor compensation of PJM, described above, to determine the fraction of series capacitor installation(s) that would require thyristor control for SSR suppression. The simulation has been designed to emulate technology and control algorithms employed in the GE/EPRI TCSC demonstration project at BPA's Slatt Substation [2]. The simulation tools used for the evaluation have been validated for this control system by comparison to both real-time simulator results [2] and to field tests. This report descibes the results of this simulation study, specifically, with the KeystoneJuniata, Conemaugh-Juniata, and Juniata-Alburtis circuits 50% compensated, and the portion of series capacitor installations on the Conemaugh-Juniata circuit with thyristor control to prevent SSR at the Conemaugh generating station. The Conemaugh units were identified among the PJM units with a potential for SSR effects in the 1988-89 studies.

Figure 1-1. The PJM 500 kV system and interconnections.

1-2

2
SUBSYNCHRONOUS RESONANCE ISSUES
Two key aspects of series capacitor application must be addressed to ensure integrity of turbine-generator units [3]: 1. Torsional Interaction. This aspect relates to the tendency of the series compensated ac transmission network to act like a negative damping influence on torsional vibrations. When this negative damping influence overcomes the inherent "mechanical" damping of the shaft torsional system, the torsional vibrations will grow exponentially until damage occurs. Generally such growth in shaft vibrations occurs with a rather long time-constant, on the order of many seconds. 2. Transient Torque. This aspect relates to the tendency of series capacitors to amplify the shaft stresses during major network transient events, over and above that which would exist without the series capacitors. Generally, the critical aspect of this phenomenon is the magnitudes of shaft vibrations after the electrical transients have decayed substantially, which is on the order of one second. SSR studies are typically done in various stages [4]. The first stage involves a screening analysis that determines the risk for SSR from the impedance-vs-frequency characteristics of the network. This "frequency-scanning" technique is an approximate assessment of potential torsional interaction, and is useful to define the critical contingencies that contribute to the overall risk of a torsional instability. Evaluation of actual interaction potential and shaft transient-stresses requires more indepth analysis. This is particularly true when the network includes large powerelectronic systems, such as HVDC, SVC, or TCSC. These systems are not amenable to impedance-scanning techniques, and the details of control action are crucial to obtaining valid results. General concepts and methods typically used for these detailed evaluations are described in the following subsections. 2.1 Analysis Method for SSR Damping The interaction between a subsynchronous mode of torsional vibration on a turbinegenerator shaft and a series compensated ac transmission line is known as subsynchronous resonance (SSR). Small-signal torsional damping is one aspect of SSR 2-1

Subsynchronous Resonance Issues

that can be described by the transfer function from generator speed to electrical torque. The real portion of this transfer function represents the so-called "electrical damping" contribution to torsional vibration decay rate. A positive electrical damping component indicates that if the generator shaft speed increases, then the electrical torque will also increase by an amount proportional to the value of the damping component. This increase in electrical torque will oppose the original perturbing force, and cause the succeeding oscillations to decay more quickly. A negative electrical-damping component indicates that if the generator shaft speed increases, then the electrical torque will decrease. This decrease in electrical torque will aid the original perturbing force, and cause subsequent oscillations to have less damping, or to become unstable. The net damping of a torsional mode of vibration consists of the electrical component, described in the previous two paragraphs, and the so-called mechanical component. The mechanical damping is due to all factors other than changes in electrical torque on the generator shaft (primarily steam flow, friction, and windage). Mechanical damping is quite small, but it is always positive, and increases with generator load. A torsional mode of vibration will be stable when the net damping is positive. A torsional mode will be unstable if electrical damping at the torsional frequency is negative and larger in magnitude than the inherent mechanical damping. Mechanical damping is minimum when a machine is at no-load, and monotonically increases with the machine load.

Figure 2.1-1. Typical electrical damping curve. The torsional stability concept is illustrated in Figure 2.1-1. A typical electrical damping curve and mechanical damping values for one torsional mode are shown. The mechanical damping values are plotted as negative values for ease of comparison with 2-2

Subsynchronous Resonance Issues

the electrical damping curve. This is shown as a bar in the plot, where the extremes are for no-load and full-load on the unit (-DNL and -DFL, respectively). The inherent mechanical damping increases with load, so it is minimum at no-load and maximum at full-load. If the electrical damping curve is below the mechanical damping point, the mode is unstable. In Figure 2.1-1, the mode shown is unstable at no load (-DNL) and stable at full load (-DFL). This type of analysis is somewhat approximate for situations off resonance, since the actual frequency of torsional vibration will vary a little due to the synchronizing effect of the electrical network. By using such analysis to determine a worst-case electrical damping within a certain frequency window, e.g., 1Hz, the procedure can be used for design purposes. 2.2 Transient Torque Analysis Methods The consequences of transient torque amplification are related to fatigue which means an accelerated loss-of-life of the turbine-generator shaft. A complete analysis of fatigue damage involves performing a large number of transient simulations with the complete network, where all conceivable switching sequences and fault timings are considered in a statistical manner. For each case, the torque responses of each shaft section are evaluated in a nonlinear manner to estimate the fatigue loss-of-life for the event. Such a detailed study is quite involved, and is usually performed as a final step prior to implementing a solution. Generally, some approximations can be made based on comparing the torsional vibration level of a few critical cases with the worst case that would exist without series compensation. This worst case is generally a full-load situation, where a fault is imposed near the generator and cleared in the worst timing with respect to the particular torsional vibration mode of concern.

2-3

3
CONEMAUGH SSR POTENTIAL WITH CONVENTIONAL SERIES CAPACITORS
The locations of the PJM series compensation used as the basis for the 1988-89 Study are shown in Figure 3-1 and will be referred to as follows: Xc1: Xc2: Compensation as a percent of the Keystone-Juniata 500 kV line inductive reactance Compensation as a percent of the Conemaugh-Juniata 500 kV line inductive reactance. Conemaugh-Juniata 500 kV line inductive reactance will be referred to as Xline. Compensation as a percent of the Juniata-Alburtis 500 kV line inductive reactance

Xc3:

Figure 3-1. SSR study equivalent system showing the location of PJM series compensation.

3-1

Conemaugh SSR Potential with Conventional Series Capacitors

The Conemaugh station consists of two cross-compound pairs of units. Each unit has several torsional modes of shaft vibration. The only modes that have a potential for interaction with the transmission network are the first mode of the HP unit, which has a frequency of approximately 27 Hz, and the first and third modes of the LP unit (9.5 Hz and 19Hz, respectively). Other modes have very low interaction with the ac network. For this analysis, conservative estimates are used for no-load and full-load damping of the torsional modes The 1989 Screening Study evaluated the PJM system with 50% compensation values for Xc1, Xc2, and Xc3. The limiting case for Conemaugh is when the 500 kV line to Keystone is out of service. This contingency results in a small risk of torsional instability under light unit-load conditions. A greater SSR interaction exists when one Conemaugh crosscompound unit is radial to Juniata (i.e., Conemaugh-Keystone & ConemaughHunterstown lines and one of the Conemaugh units are out of service). This radial case is selected for purposes of the TCSC design study. Figures 3-2 and 3-3 illustrate the calculated electrical damping, De, versus frequency for both the HP and LP units of Conemaugh, for a number of contingencies. Figure 3-2 is for the pre-contingency network, with and without 50% compensation in all three locations.

Figure 3-2. De -vs- frequency for HP and LP #1 unit of Conemaugh. Pre-contingency network with and without 50% compensation in all three locations. 3-2

Conemaugh SSR Potential with Conventional Series Capacitors

Figure 3-3 illustrates electrical damping for the critical triple contingency case, where one Conemaugh unit is left radial from Juniata. Only the 27 Hz mode of the HP unit is affected. The 19 Hz and 9.5 Hz modes of the LP unit are low enough in frequency to avoid significant SSR interaction with the transmission system resonances.

Figure 3-3. De -vs- frequency for HP and LP #1 unit of Conemaugh. Critical contingency case where Conemaugh is radial from Juniata. Due to the topology of this contingency network, the frequency of the critical electrical resonance is affected mostly by the external capacitors (Xc1 and Xc3). The SSR impact of this particular resonance on Conemaugh is amplified by Xc2. Figure 3-4 illustrates the sensitivity of the SSR impact to the value of Xc1 and Xc3, with Xc2 fixed at 50%. Note the frequency of the resonance shifts significantly as the value of Xc1 and Xc3 are changed.

3-3

Conemaugh SSR Potential with Conventional Series Capacitors

Figure 3-4. De -vs- frequency for Conemaugh HP Unit #1. Critical contingency case where Conemaugh Unit #1 is radial from Juniata. Variations of Xc1 & Xc3 with Xc2=50%. The damping impact on the Conemaugh HP 27Hz torsional mode is illustrated as a function of Xc2 in Figure 3-5, for selected values of the external capacitors. Note that the worst case is always with Xc1 and Xc3 at 48%. For the purposes of this study Xc1 and Xc3 were set at 48% instead of 50% to exhibit maximum interaction with the 27 Hz torsional 3-4

Conemaugh SSR Potential with Conventional Series Capacitors

mode of Conemaugh HP. These results can be used to determine the maximum level of Xc2.

Figure 3-5. De -vs- series compensation XC2. Critical contingency case where Conemaugh Unit #1 is radial from Juniata. Each curve represents a constant value for Xc1%=Xc3% series compensation. Two criteria can be considered, each representing different degrees of conservatism. The most conservative approach would be to choose the point of zero electrical damping (De = 0), which means that the inherent mechanical damping will be maintained to guarantee stability. In this case, the maximum possible Xc2 with Xc1=Xc3=48% would be near 15% (point A on Figure 3-5). Another approach is to select the point where the dashed-dotted curve crosses the no-load (-Dm,light load) damping line, which means that any perturbation to the torsional vibrations will cause oscillations without growth or decay. This criterion would permit Xc2 to be as high as 25% (point B on Figure 3-5). For the contingency that isolates Conemaugh on the line to Juniata, the HP 27 Hz torsional mode is unstable at no load, and will be very close to a zero-margin situation at full load on the unit. Figures 3-6 and 3-7 illustrate both situations in the time domain.

3-5

Conemaugh SSR Potential with Conventional Series Capacitors

Figure 3-6. Transient response following a trip of the Conemaugh-Keystone line leaving Conemaugh Unit #1 operating at light load radial from Juniata.

3-6

Conemaugh SSR Potential with Conventional Series Capacitors

Figure 3-7. Transient response following a trip of the Conemaugh-Keystone line leaving Conemaugh Unit #1 operating at full load radial from Juniata.

3-7

Conemaugh SSR Potential with Conventional Series Capacitors

These cases represent the transient response following a trip of the ConemaughKeystone line. The Conemaugh breakers are assumed already in a position to isolate one of the Conemaugh units onto the Juniata line after clearing the line to Keystone. Note the growth of the 27 Hz oscillations in the light-load case, as predicted by the damping curve of Figure 3-4. This is an example of an SSR torsional instability. At full load on the unit, the inherent mechanical damping is sufficient to overcome the negative influence caused by the series capacitor, and the 27 Hz mode continues with nearly constant amplitude rather than growing.

3-8

4
TCSC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
This section describes basic characteristics of the TCSC, and specific aspects of design that are important for the SSR-mitigation objective of this study. 4.1 TCSC Operating Characteristics Figure 4-1 illustrates the power circuit of a single TCSC module. A TCSC module consists of a series capacitor with a parallel path that includes a thyristor switch with surge inductor. A complete TCSC system may be composed of several such modules in series and may accompany a conventional series capacitor bank as part of an overall project to aid system performance. TCSC modules have three basic modes of operation; thyristors blocked (no gating and zero thyristor conduction), thyristor bypassed (continuous gating and full thyristor conduction), and operating in vernier mode with phase control of gate signals and subsequent partial thyristor conduction.

Figure 4-1. TCSC module power circuit.

The various modes of operation are described in depth in [5].

Since thyristor control can alter the apparent 60 Hz impedance of the module, it is important to clarify certain terms: Xc = "Nominal" reactance of capacitors only (@60 Hz), ohms ILine = Line current magnitude Xord = Net reactance of TCSC in per unit of Xc (@60 Hz) 4-1

TCSC Design Considerations

For example, Xord = +1.0 pu means operation with no thyristor current Xord = +1.5 pu means operation with thyristor firing such that the 60 Hz component of capacitor voltage is 1.5*Xc*ILine and lags current by 90 (capacitive). Or Ic = 1.5 * ILine -0.5 pu means operation with thyristor firing such that the 60 Hz component of capacitor voltage is 0.5*Xc*ILine and leads current by 90 (inductive)

Xord =

The convention used here defines positive reactance as capacitive and negative reactance as inductive. Since we are evaluating a series capacitor, the capacitive value is taken as positive ohms. XTCSC is defined as, XTCSC (ohms) = Xord (pu) * Xc (ohms) The total series compensation will be defined as: XC = Xfixed + XTCSC where, Xfixed is the inductive reactance of the fixed (conventional) portion of the series capacitor installation. 4.2 SSR Damping Characteristics of TCSC The natural response of a series compensated line involves an electrical mode of oscillation between the voltage on the series capacitor and the current in the line inductance. These oscillations are below the operating frequency, i.e., subsynchronous, when the line is less than 100% compensated. Proper control of a TCSC can yield a beneficial damping influence on the subsynchronous electrical modes of oscillation. This is illustrated by the example associated with Figure 5-1 in Reference [6]. The sample system consists of two infinite buses connected by an inductor in series with a capacitor representing a series compensated transmission line. If this system is stimulated by a minor disturbance, it oscillates at its natural frequency of 15 Hz. The line current and capacitor voltage are 60 Hz modulated by the 15 Hz subsynchronous oscillations. If the series capacitor in the line is replaced by an equivalent TCSC operating in the vernier mode, the brief 4-2

TCSC Design Considerations

conduction periods of the thyristor valve prevent the capacitor from participating in the resonant oscillation. The TCSC looks effectively as a resistor at the subsynchronous frequency and reduces the resonance [7]. The net response shows only 60 Hz waveforms for capacitor voltage and line current. There are a number of unfavorable aspects associated with these subsynchronous oscillations. The most widely recognized, however, is the interaction with turbinegenerator torsional modes of vibration, commonly referred to as subsynchronous resonance, or SSR. The basic constant reactance control of the TCSC inherently provides critical damping of the subsynchronous electrical mode. The SSR performance benefits discussed in this application are the result of a specific control algorithm. GE's proprietary TCSC control design is used in this report to demonstrate the benefits of TCSC for SSR damping. A compensated system that consists entirely of TCSC can be shown to be SSR-neutral; the system will exhibit no resonances at subsynchronous frequencies. Recent field tests have confirmed these predicted performance characteristics [8] at the Bonneville Power Administration's Slatt substation to demonstrate SSR mitigation utilizing TCSC. Further simulation of systems with only part of the compensation being TCSC suggests that the TCSC acts similar to a resistive element in the circuit in terms of damping to oscillations. A small portion of TCSC with a total compensation system can be effective in preventing the otherwise lightly damped electrical oscillations from causing undesirable behavior on the overall network. 4.3 Selection of Nominal Xord When designing a TCSC, one of the criteria is to meet a certain effective reactance in nominal conditions. A degree of freedom available to the designer is how this is achieved, in terms of Xc and Xord. For example, a 10 ohm effective reactance can be achieved with an 8 ohm Xc designed to operate with Xord of 1.25, a 5 ohm Xc with Xord of 2.0, or any other such combination. For the specific case of using a small TCSC to help mitigate SSR caused by other fixed capacitors in the network, past studies have shown that a design Xord between 1.5 and 2.0 is a good selection. The higher degree of vernier operation provides more dynamic range around the nominal operating point, and is at a more stable point on the TCSC characteristic than with operation with Xord below 1.5 or above 2.0.

4-3

TCSC Design Considerations

4.4 Special Considerations at Low Line Current The TCSC is a unique application of thyristors, in that the voltage across the valve varies substantially over the operating range. In nearly all other applications of thyristor valves, the voltage is nearly constant, at most varying over a 2:1 range in normal operation. With the series compensation application the voltage will be proportional to line current, which can vary over a range exceeding 20:1. The challenge is to design a thyristor valve that has enough insulation to withstand the high-current extremes (while retaining normal control), and yet can ensure secure gating at a voltage of only a few percentage of maximum. Thyristors have an inherent limit on how low a voltage such gating can be considered secure, so there will exist a point at which the thyristor valve must be blocked, and normal thyristor control will be lost. This consideration leads to the operating strategy of deliberately blocking the thyristor valves when line current falls below some predetermined level. Experience to date suggests that the threshold for this action will be from 5% to 10% of the rated continuous current. When low-current blocking is active, the benefit of firing the thyristors for SSR damping will be lost. Therefore, for applications where SSR is a concern, the bypass breaker must also be closed when this low-current blocking action is taken to remove the series capacitors from the power circuit. Because the SSR oscillations take several seconds to become a problem, this bypass function can be designed to have a substantial delay. Since speed is not required, the control can be designed for robustness. Bypassing for extended low-current conditions should not present any problem for power system operations, since at low current, the series compensation is not needed for its primary purpose of improving transfer capability.

4-4

5
TCSC/CONVENTIONAL HYBRID SERIES COMPENSATION
To reach the desired 50% total compensation on the three selected PJM lines, TCSC can be used in some proportion to mitigate the SSR problem defined in Section 3. This section addresses the design of a TCSC whose primary purpose is SSR mitigation. Previous studies have shown that equipping all of the series compensation with thyristor control will avoid the problematic resonance situation, and result in an SSRneutral system. For economic reasons, however, it is desirable to minimize the rating of TCSC needed and design a hybrid system including both conventional series compensation and TCSC. The challenge is to determine the minimum amount of TCSC needed to meet the application needs. The following analysis focuses on quantifying the stability aspect of the application. The transient torque aspect is dealt with qualitatively. 5.1 TCSC Rating Selection For each effective XTCSC in ohms, the nominal Xord [5] is a variable that can be selected by the designer. Table 5.1-1 shows a selection of possible combinations to meet the desired total compensation of 50% with varying fractions of TCSC and various choices for nominal Xord. The XTCSC value in the XTCSC/Fixed ratio is given in percent of the Conemaugh-Juniata line inductive reactance. This percentage convention for XTCSC will be used throughout the remainder of this paper.

5-1

TCSC/Conventional Hybrid Series Compensation

Table 5.1-1 Possible Conventional Series Capacitor and TCSC Choices for Xc2 = 50% as a Percentage of Conemaugh-Juniata Line (76.25 ohms)

XTCSC/Fixed (percent) 0/50 10/40 15/35 25/25 35/15 50/0

Fixed (ohms) 38.1 30.5 26.7 19.1 11.4 0

XTCSC (ohms) 0 7.6 11.4 19.1 26.7 38.1

XC (ohms) @ Nominal Xord 1.1 0 6.9 10.4 17.3 24.3 34.6 1.5 0 5.1 7.6 12.7 17.8 25.4 2.0 0 3.8 5.7 9.5 13.4 19.1

For this study, a nominal Xord of 1.5 is selected. The continuous rating of the series equipment is assumed to be 2500 amps. 5.2 Operating Conditions A large number of factors must be considered in designing the control loops for the TCSC. Robustness must be guaranteed over a large range of operating conditions, and attention to this aspect is required prior to any evaluation of TCSC performance for SSR damping. A number of power system network operating configurations and power flows through the TCSC were evaluated in this project to ensure an adequate stability margin on the inner control loops for the TCSC options studied. For the transient simulations subsequently presented, the post-contingency scenario is the case where Conemaugh #1 is isolated on the line to Juniata and is near minimum load (215 MW). In this case the line current is approximately 250 amps, which corresponds to approximately 10% of the TCSC rating. This will be considered a level where TCSC firing control is able to operate.

5-2

TCSC/Conventional Hybrid Series Compensation

5.3 SSR-Mitigation Performance Figure 5.3-1 illustrates the benefit of TCSC in terms of small-signal damping versus frequency curves similar to those presented in Section 2. The different curves represent different ratios of XTCSC to conventional series capacitors. These are the same ratios as defined in Table 4.1-1 with Xord constant at 1.5 pu. These results for Xord at 1.5 pu are summarized in Figure 5.3-2. This shows the worst expected damping on the critical first mode of the HP unit as a function of XTCSC (in percent of the total line impedance). Figure 5.3-3 illustrates a time-domain view of this improvement, which compares responses with different TCSC ratios for the same fault and line clearing event as shown in Figure 3-6. In each group of three, the top trace is for the 50% conventional series capacitor as a reference, the middle is for the 10/40 case, and the bottom is for the 25/25 case.

5-3

TCSC/Conventional Hybrid Series Compensation

Figure 5.3-3 illustrates the important points regarding the phenomena of interest and the performance of the TCSC. Among the key points are the following: 1. The ringdown of electrical oscillations after the fault show two important impacts of the TCSC. These oscillations are an exchange of energy between the capacitors and the inductance of the line, which is stimulated by the electrical disturbance. These are most readily observed in the time period from about 0.2 to 0.7 seconds in the plots, and are most evident in the voltage across the fixed capacitor (Fixed Capacitor, kV) portion. Note that the frequency of these oscillations significantly reduces as the percentage of fixed capacitance decreases -- this indicates that the line resonance is being moved away from the torsional mode. Second, note that the decay rate improves as the percentage of TCSC increases. This is a consequence of the TCSC appearing as a resistive component to the line resonances. 2. As shown by the HP Generator Speed curves, the torsional vibrations experience less stimulation as the portion of TCSC increases. This is an indication that transient torque amplification will be attenuated by the TCSC, so a trend similar to the impact on torsional damping can be expected. 3. As shown by the HP Generator Speed curves, the torsional vibrations are better damped as the portion of XTCSC increases. This is consistent with the preceding discussion of damping based on frequency-domain analysis. These three curves are enlarged and shown for a longer time period in Figure 5.3-4 for closer inspection. In the case without TCSC, note the continued subsynchronous component in the capacitor voltage. This is evidence of significant interaction with the turbinegenerator shaft vibrations. Even a relatively small amount of XTCSC provides significant attenuation to this oscillation.

5-4

TCSC/Conventional Hybrid Series Compensation

Figure 5.3-1. Comparison of Conemaugh HP torsional damping with various XTCSC/Fixed capacitor ratios to maintain a constant Xc2=50%. Post-contingency system with Conemaugh Unit #1 operating at low load and radial from Juniata. XTCSC at Xord = 1.5.
5-5

TCSC/Conventional Hybrid Series Compensation

Figure 5.3-2. Expected damping of the critical first mode of the HP unit as a function of the XTCSC component of the total 50% compensation. Post-contingency system with Conemaugh Unit #1 operating at low load and radial from Juniata.

5-6

TCSC/Conventional Hybrid Series Compensation

Figure 5.3-3. Initial transient response of selected variables. Responses follow a fault & trip of the Conemaugh-Keystone leaving Conemaugh Unit #1 operating at light load and radial from Juniata. Various XTCSC/Fixed ratios to maintain Xc2=50%.

5-7

TCSC/Conventional Hybrid Series Compensation

Figure 5.3-4. Long term transient response of HP generator speed. Response follows a fault & trip of the Conemaugh-Keystone leaving Conemaugh Unit #1 operating at light load and radial from Juniata. Various XTCSC/Fixed ratios to maintain Xc2=50%.
5-8

TCSC/Conventional Hybrid Series Compensation

5.4 TCSC/Fixed Series Capacitor Combination As described in Section 3, various criteria can be applied when making a selection for the ratio of XTCSC and fixed compensation. Two possible criteria noted in Section 3 are to use zero margin on no-load damping, or zero electrical damping. From Figure 4.3-1, this would require an XTCSC that was approximately 17% or 21%, respectively, of the line impedance. Consideration must be given to the possible need to bypass the TCSC under certain conditions (e.g., very low line currents for extended duration). In this condition, the remaining fixed compensation must be below the level at which SSR concerns would exist. These have been identified in Section 2, and are summarized in Table 5.4-1. The table also indicates the minimum portion of fixed compensation that must be bypassed with the TCSC. Figure 5.4-1 illustrates the circuit concept. Table 5.4-1 TCSC & Fixed Capacitor Segments TCSC SSR Criterion De > No-Load De > 0 (% of XLine) 17 21 XF1 (% of XLine) 8 14 XF2 (% of XLine) 25 15 Total (% of XLine) 50 50

Figure 5.4-1. TCSC & Fixed Capacitor Switching Segments

5-9

TCSC/Conventional Hybrid Series Compensation

5.5 Enhanced SSR Mitigation with Modulation Control The benefits previously described were realized with the basic "constant-reactance" mode of TCSC control, developed for the Slatt project [2]. A limited investigation has been undertaken here to estimate the potential benefits of augmenting the control with a special modulation signal to enhance the damping of torsional vibrations. Several factors are important when designing such a modulation control. One key is that an input signal local to the TCSC be utilized, since secure transmission of a wideband signal from a remote location would be a significant reliability concern. For this evaluation, the input signal is derived solely from the line current flowing through the TCSC. Another factor to consider is the robustness of such a control function. It must act in a way that is at least neutral to other performance aspects of all power system operating conditions. Important performance aspects include the impact of control on all turbinegenerator unit torsional modes of vibration in the electrical vicinity, and the impact of ambient noise in the system on the increased sensitivity of the control system. For this evaluation, robustness was checked for conditions with all-lines in service and for the critical contingency. It is expected that the performance indicated in the following discussion can be achieved while satisfying the robustness criteria, although significant study effort is needed to finalize the control design. Figures 5.5-1 and 5.5-2 illustrates the beneficial impact of this modulation control. The 10%/40% XTCSC/Fixed choice for TCSC rating was selected for this illustration, since with constant-reactance control it is too small to remedy the SSR concern with Conemaugh. The first trace illustrates the base case, without modulation, which is the same as presented in Section 4.3 of this report. HP generator shaft speed is shown in Figure 5.51, while TCSC firing advance angle () is shown in Figure 5.5-2. Note that the firing angle is not constant in this base case, due to the inherent action of the control to hold a constant-reactance effect. The second and third plots in Figures 5.5-1 and 5.5-2 illustrate cases with modulation, at two different gain settings. The gain in the second plot in each figure represents what is likely to be an acceptable level for a robust control. The gain in the third plot in each figure represents twice the expected acceptable level. Note the increased motion in firing angle in Figure 5.5-2 as modulation gain is increased. This indicates that the dynamic range of the TCSC control is being utilized to aid damping of the torsional vibrations. The damping is seen in the improved decay rate of the 27Hz vibrations in generator speed shown Figure 5.5-1. 5-10

TCSC/Conventional Hybrid Series Compensation

Figure 5.5-1. Beneficial impact of modulation control. Transient response of HP generator speed following a fault and trip of the Conemaugh-Keystone leaving Conemaugh Unit #1 operating at light load and radial from Juniata. Various modulation gains.

5-11

TCSC/Conventional Hybrid Series Compensation

Figure 5.5-2. Beneficial impact of modulation control. Transient response of firing angle advance in degrees following a fault and trip of the Conemaugh-Keystone leaving Conemaugh Unit #1 operating at light load and radial from Juniata. Various modulation gains.
5-12

TCSC/Conventional Hybrid Series Compensation

The expected benefit of such modulation control is summarized in Figure 5.5-3, where the modulation gain is selected as the value which is likely to satisfy the robustness criteria. With modulation, the size of the TCSC needed to alleviate the SSR concern is smaller than without modulation. For the example of De>No-Load criterion, including modulation would mean that the TCSC could be 12%, compared to the 17% needed without modulation.

Figure 5.5-3. Expected benefit of modulation control. Electrical damping with modulation (bold line) and without modulation (thin line).

5-13

6
OTHER MITIGATION METHODS
This section discusses other existing SSR countermeasures that are generator-based or series capacitor bank-based. The TCSC case study system is used as a benchmark to demonstrate the potential of a series capacitor bypass filter for mitigating SSR. Other SSR counter measures are discussed briefly and existing applications are noted. 6.1 Series Capacitor Bypass Filters Capacitor bypass filtering (CBF), Figure 6-1, is a passive technique to short circuit subsynchronous capacitor voltage while blocking the bypass for synchronous capacitor voltage through parallel resonance.

Figure 6-1. Series capacitor bypass filter.

The SSR mitigation performance of a bypass filter was demonstrated with the Conemaugh-Juniata 500kV series compensated system. Variations were made to the bypass filter capacitance and the filter resistance to see how they each affected the 27Hz system resonance that occurs when the lightly loaded Conemaugh units is left radial on the series compensated line. The relationship between capacitance, capacitance impedance, and filter rating relative to the series capacitor are given in Table 6-1.

6-1

Other Mitigation Methods

Table 6-1 Series Capacitor Bypass Filter Elements Cf Capacitance (pu on C2) 0 .20 .50 1.0 Xcf Impedance (pu on Xc2) 5 2 1 Xcf Rating (pu on Xc2) 0 .20 .50 1.0

Figure 6-2 shows how the damping characteristics change as the filter capacitance, Cf, is increased from 0, to 20%, to 50%, and 100%, of the line series capacitance, C2. The 60Hz bypass filter reactance impedance, Xlf, is set equal to the 60Hz filter capacitance impedance, Xcf, in each case.

6-2

Other Mitigation Methods

Figure 6-2. Series capacitor bypass filter on Conemaugh-Juniata 500kV line. Conemaugh Unit #1, at low load, is radial on the Juniata line. Series capacitor Xc2 is fixed at 50% and all other external series capacitors are set to 48%. Filter resistance, Rf = 2*Xc2. Vary filter capacitor impedance, Xcf.
The weakness in the bypass filter is in protection of the lowest subsynchronous frequency mechanical modes, typically below 20Hz mechanical (40Hz electrical). In Figure 6-2, the initial resonance at 27Hz (solid line) moves down to 25Hz as the filter capacitance is increased to 20% of C2. The initial resonance moves even further with increasing Cf. The bar labeled -DM in each right-hand plot [b] identifies the 27Hz mode damping from no-load (-.20) to full load (-2.0) for the Conemaugh unit. Figure 6-2[b] shows that the filter capacitance (Cf) must be greater than half of the line series capacitance (C2) to achieve marginal damping of the 27Hz mode. This can be seen by comparing the dashed line with the dash-dotted line. The filter size (rating, costs) increase with decreasing torsional frequency.

6-3

Other Mitigation Methods

The initial resistance was chosen as Rf = 2*Xc2. Figure 6-3 shows how the damping characteristics change as the filter resistance, Rf, is varied from 5x, 2x, 1x, and .5x the impedance value of the series capacitance, Xc2. The bypass filter capacitance impedance, Xcf, was set equal to 2*Xc2. As show in Figure 6-3[a], fine tuning the bypass filter moves the resonance point to less than 20Hz. Setting filter resistance equal to or less than the impedance value of the series capacitance avoids the instability at 27Hz. However, if there were a torsional mode near 20Hz, then the 20Hz mode would be adversely affected by the lower values of Rf.

Figure 6-3. Series capacitor bypass filter on Conemaugh-Juniata 500kV line. Conemaugh Unit #1, at low load, is radial on the Juniata line. Series capacitor Xc2 is fixed at 50% and all other external series capacitors are set to 48%. Filter capacitance, Xcf = 2*Xc2. Vary filter resistance, Rf.

6-4

Other Mitigation Methods

This cursory analysis shows that this SSR mitigation scheme has potential for moving the resonance point away from the critical frequency. An initial bypass filter design would include the following components relative to the series capacitor Xc2:

Xcf Impedance (pu on Xc2) 2

Xcf Rating (pu on Xc2) .50

Xlf Impedance (pu on Xc2) 2

Rf Impedance (pu on Xc2) .5

These results reflect a single system condition with the Conemaugh unit at low loading. Stronger conclusions can be drawn only after other system configurations and dispatches have been examined. 6.2 Discussion of Other SSR Countermeasures Since the early 1970s there have been many technical papers published on the subject of SSR. The IEEE Torsional Issues Working Group has recently published the fourth supplement to A Bibliography for the Study of Subsynchronous Resonance Between Rotating Machines and Power Systems [10]. This section provides a short description of other SSR countermeasures. These countermeasures have been segregated by those techniques that are unit-based and those techniques that are series capacitor-based. The following countermeasures are installed at the unit that is at risk for SSR.
Series Blocking Filter - This is the only complete solution to the transient torque problem at high levels of series compensation. The filter is installed in series with the generator by placing it in the neutral end of the generator step-up (GSU) transformer high-side. This is a tuned filter with inductance and capacitance in parallel with one filter stage for each torsional mode. This type of filter has been in service at the Navajo Plant in Arizona for 20 years [11]. Supplementary Excitation Damping Control (SEDC) - This controller modulates generator field voltage to add torsional damping. The SEDC control [12,13] is useful for moderate destabilization problems or as a supplement to a Series Blocking Filter. The SEDC requires a high response excitation system and requires measured shaft oscillations as an input signal. This controller is in operation at the Navajo, Jim Bridger, and Coronado generating units in the Western USA. Synchronous Machine Frequency (SMF) Relay and Digital Pulsation Relay (DPR) - These relays provide protection by tripping the unit for excessive torsional oscillations. Shaft oscillations of the unit are monitored directly. These relays are used as backup protection only,

6-5

Other Mitigation Methods

not primary protection. The SMF and DPR are also used in cases where an SSR problem occurs only after multiple contingencies. These relays are installed on many units [14,15]. Subsynchronous Oscillation (SSO) Relays - The SSO relays provide protection by tripping the unit for excessive subsynchronous frequencies in armature current. However, it is difficult to coordinate armature current frequency content to torsional oscillations. Therefore, these relays are prone to false trips. Like the SMF and DPR, these relays are intended for backup protection only, not primary protection. The SSO relays are also used in cases where an SSR problem occurs only after multiple contingencies. Shunt Damping Controls are known as Torsional Dynamic Stabilizers [16], Shunt Reactor Stabilizers, and Static VAr Stabilizers. These controls are essentially a reactor installed in shunt with the generator either on the high-side or low-side of the GSU. One dynamic stabilizer has been in service on one unit at San Juan for about 15 years [17]. Series Damping Controls - A separate thyristor control device is placed in the high-side neutral end of the GSU. The thyristor bridge is in series with the generator and is gated in response to measurement of shaft oscillations. There is additional inductance in parallel with the thyristor device. There are no known prototype or in-service applications. Torsional Vibration Monitoring Systems (TVMS) and Torsional Stress Analayzer (TSA) While not strictly protection, these devices provide information on the torsional performance of the unit and other protective devices. They can be used to provide post disturbance information on shaft torques, shaft fatigue, and torsional damping.

The following countermeasures are installed at the series capacitor bank:

Dual or Low Gap Spark Over - These gaps remove the series capacitors during transients at lower levels than the normal Spark Over Gap voltage thereby reducing the transient torque problem in the generators. Low Gaps are not in service during capacitor bank insertion. A disadvantage of this countermeasure is that it removes the series capacitors when they are most desired. These gaps have been installed on many capacitor banks in WSCC since he mid 1970s. Metal Oxide Varistors (MOV) Protection - MOVs in parallel with the series capacitors limit the voltage on the capacitors during transients while the series capacitors remain in service. Limiting the voltage reduces the transient torque problem on the generators. MOV protection has been installed on some new series capacitor banks since the late 1980s. Transfer Tripping / Capacitor Insertion Schemes - Several series capacitor installations in the USA only allow the series capacitors to be inserted when line flows and/or generation levels require them. At Jim Bridger in Wyoming, all units on-line must be above 50% load before the high levels of series capacitors are used. Other schemes will bypass series capacitors upon certain line contingencies that expose the generation to SSR problems. Capacitor Bank Filters - Different filters, with resistors and/or inductors, for series capacitors have been analyzed over the years for SSR stability control. These filters have also been studied

6-6

Other Mitigation Methods

with special MOV devices to provide transient torque control. None of these filters has been installed. Phase Unbalanced Series Capacitors - A phase unbalance in the series capacitors can be achieved by having additional capacitors offset at 60 Hz with additional series inductance. This scheme has been shown to reduce the peak SSR undamping. The trade-off is that the destabilization is then spread over a broader frequency range. There have been no actual installations.

6-7

7
CONCLUSIONS
This simulation study demonstrates the potential for SSR suppression by using thyristor control of only a portion of a series capacitor system. This approach offers the potential of significantly lower equipment cost relative to the cost of using thyristor control of the entire installation. Additionally, adding special modulation to the TCSC control shows promise for further reducing the required size of the thyristor-controlled portion, and therefore total cost. It should be noted that the study case was only one of several contingencies with potential to cause SSR within the study system. Eigenvalue analysis and time simulations, whose results were in essential agreement, were performed for the PJM 50% series compensation application using special simulation tools developed by GE. Simulations modeled the thyristor control algorithm developed for the EPRI-sponsored TCSC demonstration at BPA's Slatt Substation, plus special modulation controls developed by GE after the Slatt installation was completed. Simulation results show that, without thyristor control and approximately 50% compensation of three lines, loss of the Keystone-Conemaugh line with one Conemaugh generator and the Conemaugh-Hunterstown line out of service produced an unstable SSR interaction with the first torsional of the Conemaugh HP unit. Thyristor control of only a portion of the Conemaugh-Juniata series compensation using the constantimpedance control scheme of the Slatt installation sufficiently mitigated the potential for SSR within the context of the contingency studied. Simulating a superimposed firing modulation scheme for special SSR damping further increased the effectiveness of the thyristor control. While this study shows a potential for use of special SSR damping controls, adaptation to any of a set of possible contingencies would require further study. It is possible that the usefulness of special controls will depend on the richness of the potential SSR interactions within a particular case or within particular contingencies of that case. An important consideration in the application of such technology to mitigate SSR is the confidence in study results. One aspect of such a study is the ability to foresee and test all contingencies which affect the interaction with generator shaft torsional modes. An understanding of the key issues permits this to be accomplished with confidence. Another key aspect is the confidence in the modeling of the power system, the generators, and the TCSC. The former has been well established over the past two decades, in both time-simulation and eigenvalue domains. The TCSC model can be 7-1

Conclusions

constructed from basic principles for both time-simulation and eigenvalue studies as well, and the simulation tools used for this analysis have been proven versus results from a real-time simulator and from the field. Thus, the basic aspects required for confident application exist and such a concept should be considered a realistic option for the future. The PJM series compensation case, studied here, has illustrated a number of features for SSR suppression by thyristor control. This case provides a useful benchmark for studying candidate control schemes for SSR suppression in highly interconnected systems. This report also illustrates the use of the benchmark case with a passive filtering scheme; other known SSR suppression techniques are described briefly.

7-2

8
REFERENCES
[1] C.E.J. Bowler, M.D. Kankam, R.E. Stickle, G.E. Boukarim, H.Othman, N. Rostamkolai, "SSR Screening Study and Torsional Test Analysis, PJM 500 kV Series Compensation Proposal for Public Service Electric and Gas of New Jersey," Final Report, General Electric Company, June 7, 1989. S. Nyati, C.A. Wegner, R.W. Delmerico, D.H. Baker, R.J. Piwko, A. Edris, "Effectiveness of Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor in Enhancing Power System Dynamics: An Analog Simulator Study," IEEE Trans. PwrDelivery, vol.9, No.2,April 1994, pp1018-1027. C.E.J. Bowler, "Series Capacitor Based SSR Mitigation Prospects," EPRI FACTS Workshop, Cincinnati, Ohio, Nov. 14-16, 1990. C.E.J. Bowler, M.D. Kankam, "Subsynchronous Resonance Analysis - Case Study A Systematic Approach to SSR Planning Study," Presented at Pennsylvania Electric Association, System Operating Committee Meeting, Philadelphia, February 2-3, 1989. E.V. Larsen, K. Clark, S.A. Miske, Jr., J. Urbanek, "Characteristics and Rating Considerations of Thyristor Controlled Series Compensation," IEEE Trans. PwrDelivery, vol.9, No.2, April 1994, pp. 992-1000. E.V. Larsen, C.E.J. Bowler, B.Damsky, S.Nilsson, "Benefits of Thyristor Controlled Series Compensation," CIGRE paper 14/37/38-04, 1992. W. Zhu, R. Spee, R.R. Mohler, G.C. Alexander, W.A. Mittelstadt, D. Maratukulam, "An EMTP Study of SSR Mitigation Using the Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor," IEEE PES Paper 94-SM-477-0-PWRD. San Francisco, CA, July 1994. R.J. Piwko, C.A. Wegner, B.C. Furumasu, B.L. Damskey, J.D. Eden, The Slatt Thyristor-Controlled Series Capacitor Project - Design, Installation, Commissioning, and System Testing, CIGRE paper presentation at 1994 session in Paris.

[2]

[3] [4]

[5]

[6] [7]

[8]

8-1

References

[9]

A.T. Hill, E.V. Larsen, E. Hyman, Thyristor Control for SSR Suppression - A Case Study, Presented at Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS 3): The Future in High-Voltage Transmission, Sponsored by Electric Power Research Institute, October 5-7, 1994 Baltimore, Maryland.

[10] A Bibliography for the Study of Subsynchronous Resonance Between Rotating Machines and Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-95, No. 1, pp. 216-218, Jan.-Feb. 1976. [11] J.F. Tang, J.A. Young, Operating Experience of Navajo Static Blocking Filter, IEEE PES Special Publication 81TH0086-9-PWR, pp. 23-26. [12] C.E.J. Bowler, D.H. Baker, Concepts of Supplementary Torsional Damping by Excitation Modulation, IEEE PES Special Publication 81TH0086-9-PWR, pp. 64-69. [13] C.E.J. Bowler, R.A. Lawson, Operating Experience With Supplemental Excitation Damping Controls, IEEE PES Special Publication 81TH0086-9-PWR, pp. 27-33. [14] C.E.J. Bowler, J.A. Demcko, L.Mankoff, W.C.Kotheimer, D.Cordray, The Navajo SMF Type Subsynchronous Resonance Relay, Paper F78-253-7, presented at the IEEE PES 1978 Winter Power Meeting. [15] C.E.J. Bowler, L.Mankoff, Experience With SMF Type Subsynchronous Resonance Relays IEEE PES Special Publication 81TH0086-9-PWR, pp. 43-46. [16] D.G.Ramey, I.A. White, J.H.Dorney, and F.H. Kroening, Application of the Dynamic Stabilizer to Solve an SSR Problem, Proceedings of the American Power Conference, Vol. 43, 1981, pp. 605-609. [17] D.G. Ramey, D.S. Kimmel, J.H.Dorney, F.H.Kroening, Dynamic Stabilizer Verification Tests at the San Juan Station, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-100, No. 12, Dec. 1981, p. 5011-5019. [18] First Supplement to a Bibliography for the Study of Subsynchronous Resonance Between Rotating Machines and Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-98, No. 6, pp. 1862-1975, Nov.-Dec. 1979. [19] The Second Supplement to a Bibliography for the Study of Subsynchronous Resonance Between Rotating Machines and Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-104, No. 2, pp. 321-327, Feb. 1985. [20] Third Supplement to a Bibliography for the Study of Subsynchronous Resonance Between Rotating Machines and Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. PWRS-6, No. 2, pp. 830-834, May 1991. 8-2

A
CONEMAUGH GENERATOR #1 TORSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
The following tables document torsional vibration modes considered in this study for the two units of the cross-compound station. As noted in the tables, only mode 1 (27.3Hz) of the HP unit and modes 1 (9.5Hz) and 3 (19.1Hz) of the LP unit have significant interaction with the electric transmission network. The tables include conservative estimates of equivalent dashpots based on an amplitude decay rates of:

NL = -.02 sec-1 @ no load FL = -.2 sec-1 @ full load These represent the lower bound of those seen from field experience over a wide range of turbine-generator units. Table A-1 HP Unit Torsional Modes Base = 545MVA Mode Frequency (fi - Hz) Modal Inertia (Mi - pu) Relative Generator Motion (QGi - pu) .263 .015 .012 .014 No-Load QGi2 _____ 2 Mi .101 .0062 .0015 .0063 .20 3.2 13 3.2 2.0 32 130 32 Dashpot Full-Load Dashpot

(DNLi - pu) (DFLi - pu)

1 2 3 4

27.3 48.2 55.6 56.4

0.344 .0182 .0490 .0156

A-1

Conemaugh Generator #1 Torsional Characteristics

Table A-2 LP Unit Torsional Modes Base = 495MVA

Mode

Frequency (fi - Hz)

Modal Inertia (Mi - pu)

Relative Generator Motion (QGi - pu) .39 .0051 .92 .00013 .083

No-Load QGi2 _____ 2 Mi .0731 .0009 .0727 small .0006 0.27 22 0.27 large 3.3 Dashpot

Full-Load Dashpot

(DNLi - pu) (DFLi - pu)

1 2 3 4 5

9.5 12.4 19.1 53.2 58.1

1.04 .014 5.82 .0058 5.4

2.7 220 2.7 large 33

A-2