Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Safety Lines
Minnesota OSHA hosts national state-plan association
At right: Department of Labor and Industry Commissioner Scott Brener welcomes the national OSHSPA group to Minnesota prior to Jon
Helberg's (seated in photo) presentation showcasing Minnesota OSHA's newly developed, technically advanced, information management system.
443 Lafayette Road N. • St. Paul, MN 55155 • (651) 284-5050 • 1-800-342-5354 • www.doli.state.mn.us/mnosha.html
Hydration, acclimatization help workers beat the heat
Although heat stress may occur year-round in foundries,
kitchens or laundries, its effects may sneak up on those
working in the heat and humidity of a Minnesota summer.
National consensus standards in OSHA’s standard for fire protection in shipyard employment
On Oct. 17, 2006, federal OSHA published in the Federal Register, a direct final rule for
shipyards that updates 11 of the 19 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
standards that were incorporated by reference Sept. 15, 2004. The direct final rule
stated the updates would become effective at the federal level Jan. 16, 2007,
unless significant adverse comment was received. Federal OSHA did not receive
significant adverse comment to the direct final rule. Therefore, a final rule and
confirmation of effective date was published in the Federal Register Jan. 3,
2007.
Electrical standard
On Feb. 14, 2007, federal OSHA published in the Federal Register, a final
rule for its updated electrical installation standard. This revision will provide
the first update of the installation requirements in the general industry electrical
installation standard since 1981. The final rule focuses on safety in the design
and installation of electrical equipment in the workplace. The updated
standard includes a new alternative method for classifying and installing
equipment in Class I hazardous locations; new requirements for ground-
fault circuit interrupters (GFCIs); and new provisions about wiring for
carnivals and similar installations. The effective date for this final rule is
Aug. 13, 2007.
All Federal Register notices and standards are available on the federal OSHA Web site, www.osha.gov.
All State Register publications are at www.comm.media.state.mn.us/bookstore/state_register.asp.
Federal OSHA signed a settlement agreement Federal OSHA signed a second settlement
April 6, 2007, with the AFL-CIO, Laborers’ agreement May 21, 2007, with the National
International Union and International Brotherhood Association of Manufacturers, et al, and Public
of Teamsters. A year earlier, the unions sued Citizen Health Research Group, et al. These
OSHA after the agency groups sued OSHA
issued a court-ordered regarding issues of
hexavalent chromium engineering controls for
standard that excluded stainless steel welding
coverage of workplace in enclosed or confined
exposures to Portland spaces, housekeeping
cement. and waste disposal. As
part of this settlement,
As part of the April OSHA issued a letter of
settlement, OSHA will interpretation regarding
issue a new document these issues.
providing specific
enforcement procedures In the letter, federal
for working with OSHA wrote that an
Portland cement. The employer may be
document will explain considered in
how existing OSHA standards and requirements compliance with the welding in confined-spaces
apply to operations involving Portland cement, and provisions if it has done the most that is possible,
will collect all applicable provisions in a single even if exposures remain above the permissible
inspection checklist. When Portland cement is exposure limit (PEL). Secondly, if an employer has
present, the inspections will focus on sanitation, objective data that exposures will remain below
personal protective equipment, hazard 0.5 μg/m3, the housekeeping and waste disposal
communication (i.e. employee right-to-know), provisions do not apply. Lastly, OSHA will
training, recordkeeping and dust from certain evaluate on a case by case basis whether an
operations (terrazzo work, mixing mortar or employer correctly determined it was infeasible to
jobsite mixing of concrete). dispose of large, bulky materials in impermeable
containers. See www.osha.gov for the full text of
The settlement agreement is not binding for state the letter of interpretation.
OSHA programs, such as Minnesota OSHA.
However, Portland cement inspection procedures, Employers that wish assistance with compliance
will be published as an appendix to the OSHA with the new hexavalent chromium standard,
compliance directive about the chromium including air-quality monitoring, may contact
standard, to be issued later this year. State OSHA Minnesota OSHA Workplace Safety Consultation at
programs will be required to adopt a compliance (651) 284-5060 or osha.consultation@state.mn.us.
directive at least as effective as the federal
directive when it is issued. In response, Minnesota
OSHA has adopted a directive that follows the
terms of the federal agreement.
The last time anyone at E.J. Ajax had a serious injury was 16 years ago — that’s aeons by
typical manufacturing standards. Back then, the company embarked on a process of continuous
safety improvements.
Today, E.J. Ajax provides every new hire with safety gear that includes safety glasses —
prescription if necessary; a $200 pair of work boots, ear protection and more. Metal-stamping
equipment has multiple safety guards.
Workers who handle sharp metal pieces wear elbow-length Kevlar gloves. In addition to the
safety and protection those items provide, they’re also a constant reminder of the importance
the company places on safety.
The safety culture is strictly enforced: One violation in a 12-month period gets a verbal
warning. The second is put in writing. The third results in a one-day paid “decision-making
leave,” when the employee is sent home to decide whether he or she can follow safety policies.
If not, termination results. Workers have total authority to shut down any machine or operation
at any time if they question its safety.
Conventional wisdom says that American manufacturing companies can’t compete with
offshore operations based on wages alone. By that logic, the additional investment that E.J.
Ajax makes in its workers’ safety would undermine its ability to compete. In fact, the company
E.J. Ajax continues ...
Safety Lines, Summer 2007 page 4 www.doli.state.mn.us/mnosha.html
E.J. Ajax continued ...
just received the biggest single order in its history — and 100 percent of that order will be
shipped to Asia.
Other returns are just as important but harder to measure. The safety culture makes the
company the employer of choice among many prospective workers. Many employees stay with
the company 10, 20 years or more. Rob Duval, the company’s director of employee training
and safety, says spouses come to him at company picnics to say thank you for taking care of
their employees.
For more on Minnesota workplace health and safety, visit the Department of Labor and
Industry Web site at www.doli.state.mn.us.
*As of July 12, 2007, E.J. Ajax will have worked 17 years without a lost-time injury.
Laura French is principal of Words Into Action, Inc., and is a freelance writer from Roseville.
This story was originally published Oct. 16, 2006, by Star Tribune (www.startribune.com).
Employers enhance safety and health; free assistance from Minnesota OSHA
As part of its continual effort to improve customer service and provide needed information to employers and employees,
Minnesota OSHA (MNOSHA) plans to publish answers to the most frequently asked questions from the previous quarter.
Q Does the employer have to follow the respiratory fit-testing protocol for N95 mask usage?
A An employee required to wear an N95 mask for any reason other than tuberculosis exposure
must be evaluated and fit-tested on an annual basis. However, initial fit-testing is mandatory
whenever respirators are required, regardless of the hazard. It is also required when there is a
change in the wearer’s physical condition that may interfere with the seal. If the use of
respirator is strictly voluntary on the part of the employee, fit-testing is not required.
Q How many “nationally recognized and accredited certification programs” are there for
crane operators?
A Currently, Minnesota OSHA is aware of only two nationally accredited mobile crane
certification programs: the Southern California Crane and Hoisting Certification Program; and
the National Commission for the Certification of Crane Operators (NCCCO).
A Minnesota Statutes §182.6525, subd. 1, states “An individual may not operate a crane with a
lifting capacity of five tons or more on a construction site unless the individual has a valid
crane operator certificate received from a nationally recognized and accredited certification
program.” This applies to those cranes that fall under ASME 30.5-2004 Mobile and
Locomotive Cranes. Examples of cranes covered by this consensus standard include truck-
mounted telescoping and nontelescoping boom cranes, crawler cranes, locomotive cranes and
wheel-mounted cranes.
Ask MNOSHA
Do you have a question for Minnesota OSHA? To get an answer, call (651) 284-5050 or send
an e-mail message to osha.compliance@state.mn.us. We may feature your question here.
Fact sheet
Minnesota OSHA's most frequently cited standards in the
construction industry, 2006 (SIC codes 1521 through 1799)
Links to the standards listed above are available online at www.doli.state.mn.us/oshainfo.html, under
"Citations." There are also similar lists for all industries and for general industry.
Minnesota OSHA's Workplace Safety Consultation offers similar safety seminars in Brainerd, North
Mankato and Owatonna.