Development and Psychopathology 25 (2013), 455471 # Cambridge University Press 2013 doi:10.

1017/S0954579412001174

Pubertal timing and depressive symptoms in late adolescence: The moderating role of individual, peer, and parental factors

AMELIE BENOIT, ERIC LACOURSE, AND MICHEL CLAES

University of Montreal

Abstract This longitudinal study examined personal-accentuation and contextual-amplification models of pubertal timing. In these models, individual and contextual risk factors during childhood and adolescence can magnify the effects of early or late puberty on depression symptoms that occur years later. The moderating role of prepubertal individual factors (emotional problems in late childhood) and interpersonal factors (deviant peer affiliation, early dating, perceived peer popularity, and perceived parental rejection during adolescence) were tested. A representative sample of 1,431 Canadian adolescents between 1011 and 1617 years of age was followed biannually. In line with the personal-accentuation model, early puberty has been shown to be a predictor for depression in both girls and boys who presented emotional problems in childhood. This effect was also noted for late maturing boys. Consistent with the contextual-amplification model, early puberty predicted later depression in youth who perceived greater parental rejection. Interpersonal experiences such as early dating in girls and deviant peer affiliation in boys predicted depression in early maturers as well. For girls, early dating was also found to be amplified by childhood emotional problems. In line with biopsychosocial models, results indicate that the effect of pubertal timing on depressive symptoms must be conceptualized through complex interactions between characteristics of adolescents interpersonal relationships and prepubertal vulnerabilities.

Adolescence is a critical developmental period for the onset of depression and subclinical depressive manifestations (Kessler, Avenevoli, & Ries Merikangas, 2001; Weissman et al., 1999). Because depressed youth experience significant psychological and social impairment (Wittchen, Nelson, & Lachner, 1998), understanding childhood and adolescence characteristics associated with depressive symptoms is crucial (Petersen et al., 1993). Adolescence is also marked by the pubertal transition that involves major biological, psychological, and social changes (Alsaker, 1995). Pubertal timing, which refers to the extent of the adolescents pubertal development when compared to same-sex and same-aged peers, has been associated with depressive symptoms during adolescence, mainly in girls (Weichold, Silbereisen, & Schmitt-Rodermund, 2003). Prepubertal vulnerabilities, such as emotional problems during childhood, might accentuate the effect of pubertal timing on later depression. Furthermore, specific interpersonal contexts, real or perceived, such as getting involved at an early age in romantic relationships, affiliating with deviant peers, being popular among peers, or feeling rejected by parents can also moderate the effect of pubertal timing. Following the theoretical and empirical work of Conley
This research was supported by the first authors doctoral funding from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Quebec Inter-University Center for Social Statistics. While the research and analysis are based on data from Statistics Canada, the opinions expressed herein do not represent the views of Statistics Canada. parAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Eric Lacourse, De de Montre al, C.P. 6128, succursale Centretement de sociologie, Universite al, QC H3C 3J7, Canada; E-mail: eric.lacourse@umontreal.ca. ville, Montre

and Rudolph (2009), Rudolph (2009), and Rudolph and Troop-Gordon (2010), we examined the adequacy of two models of pubertal timing: a personal-accentuation model and a contextual-amplification model that could explain differences in adolescents depression symptoms. The integration of both models will also be explored because accentuation and amplification may co-occur. Pubertal Timing and Symptoms of Depression in Adolescence Adolescents vary noticeably in their timing of pubertal development, and at least two hypotheses have been proposed to explain how pubertal timing could be related to a heightened risk of depressive symptoms in adolescence. The early-timing, or stage-termination, hypothesis (Peskin, 1967, 1973) posits that adolescents who develop earlier than their peers are more at risk of experiencing adjustment problems because they are exposed to the pubertal transition and its psychosocial consequences at a younger stage of development. Early maturers are thus considered less prepared than their peers to face the physiological changes of puberty and the social reactions to their mature appearance, because their early maturation conflicts with the normal development of late childhood, an important period in which children learn coping and social skills and develop a sense of self (Brooks-Gunn, Petersen, & Eichorn, 1985; Peskin, 1967, 1973). The deviance hypothesis suggests that developmental transitions occurring within the expected timetable are socially and culturally accepted (Susman, Dorn, & Schiefelbein, 455

456

A. Benoit, E. Lacourse, and M. Claes

2003). According to this hypothesis, adolescents with an offtime pubertal timing, that is, early and late, are more vulnerable to psychological maladjustment because they are considered to be socially deviant from on-time maturing peers and, as a result, may have to negotiate pubertal changes in a less supportive sociocultural context (Petersen & Crockett, 1985; Sarigiani & Petersen, 2000). Empirical examinations of these hypotheses have mainly supported the early-timing hypothesis, particularly for female adolescents. Girls earlier pubertal timing has been associated with more depressive symptoms, both concurrently (Graber, Lewinsohn, Seeley, & Brooks-Gunn, 1997; Kaltiala-Heino, , 2003; Miller & Gur, Marttunen, Rantanen, & Rimpela 2002; Rierdan & Koff, 1991; Siegel, Yancey, Aneshensel, & Schuler, 1999) and longitudinally (Ge, Conger, & Elder Jr., 1996, 2001a; Ge et al., 2003; Graber, Seeley, BrooksGunn, & Lewinsohn, 2004; Hayward, Killen, Wilson, & Hammer, 1997; Stice, Presnell, & Bearman, 2001). However, some findings fully or partially support the deviance hypothesis. For instance, in one study, both early and late pubertal timing were associated with greater depression (Wichstrm, 1999). However, other results suggested that late maturing girls are more inclined to experience internalizing problems, such as greater self-consciousness and lower self-esteem (Graber et al., 1997; Williams & Currie, 2000). Empirical results on adolescent boys are limited and mixed. Positive consequences, such as more self-confidence, popularity with peers, and greater social achievement, have been linked to early puberty in adolescent boys, as a more mature physical appearance could be an advantage in some social context (Felson & Haynie, 2002; Mccabe & Ricciardelli, 2004; Mussen & Jones, 1957, 1958; Taga, Markey, & Friedman, 2006). However, while some findings support the early-timing hypothesis (Ge, Conger, & Elder Jr., 2001b; Ge et al., 2003; KaltialaHeino et al., 2003), other results support the deviance hypothesis by suggesting that early and late maturing boys report more depressive symptoms (Conley & Rudolph, 2009; Graber et al., 1997). Other research suggests that only late maturers would be at risk (Siegel et al., 1999). Thus, further empirical investigation is needed to evaluate the longitudinal association between pubertal timing and depressive symptoms in both adolescent boys and girls. As a whole, empirical results for boys, although limited, seemed to support the deviance hypothesis, because early and late maturing boys tended to present more depressive symptoms than do their peers. The Interaction Between Individual Risks and Pubertal Timing in Predicting Symptoms of Depression in Adolescence Individual vulnerabilities prior to puberty can be related to depressive manifestations in adolescence. Even if heterotypic trajectories of depressive symptoms are observed throughout development (Zahn-Waxler, Klimes-Dougan, & Slattery, 2000), children who display internalized symptoms prior to puberty are more likely to report depressive symptoms in ado-

lescence and early adulthood (Costello, Mustillo, Erkanli, Keeler, & Angold, 2003; Harrington, Fudge, Rutter, Pickles, & Hill, 1991). Therefore, it is important to consider that the presence of emotional problems in late childhood can impact the way adolescents manage the pubertal transition. Caspi & Moffitt (1991) were the first to propose an accentuation model, which suggests that the effect of prebubertal individual characteristics is amplified during transitions, such as puberty. They reported that girls early pubertal maturation was linked to antisocial behaviors during adolescence, particularly in girls who already had a history of conduct problems in childhood (Caspi & Moffitt, 1991). Ge et al. (1996) also found that early maturing girls with early symptoms of psychological distress were more likely to display subsequent symptoms when compared to on-time or late maturers with the same individual history. Results from a recent study showed a similar process, suggesting that the link between earlier pubertal timing and depression was stronger in adolescents with depressive personality traits and prior depressive symptoms (Rudolph & TroopGordon, 2010). In sum, emotional problems in late childhood are thus expected to moderate the association between pubertal timing and depression by accentuating the risk of depressive symptoms for early maturing youth. The Interaction Between Pubertal Timing and Interpersonal Factors in Predicting Symptoms of Depression in Adolescence Various theoretical models have been elaborated in the aim of understanding adolescent depression (e.g., cognitive vulnerabiliy models, biological vulnerability models, emotional regulation models; for reviews, see Abela & Hankin, 2008; Beck & Alford, 2009; Nolen-Hoeksema & Hilt, 2009). Because adolescence is characterized by major shifts and reorganization in social contexts, interpersonal theories of adolescent depression have underscored the importance of considering how adolescents personal characteristics relate to their social environments (Nolen-Hoeksema & Girgus, 1994; Rudolph, 2009). Thus, recent interpersonal perspectives have proposed that relational vulnerability can interact with pubertal transition to amplify adolescents depressive symptoms (Natsuaki, Biehl, & Ge, 2009; Rudolph, 2009). In this regard, characteristics of relationships with peers and parents, such as affiliation with deviant peers, early romantic dating, perceived peer popularity, and perceived parental rejection, have been identified as interpersonal contexts that could be related to higher levels of depression during adolescence (e.g., Brendgen, Vitaro, & Bukowski, 2000; Compian, Gowen, & Hayward, 2004; Fergusson, Wanner, Vitaro, Horwood, & Swain-Campbell, 2003; Joyner & Udry, 2000; Nolan, Flynn, & Garber, 2003; Stice, Ragan, & Randall, 2004). Deviant peer affiliation in adolescence was found to be indirectly linked to depression, though the negative consequences resulting from deviant peer influences such as engaging in deviant behaviors (Fergusson et al., 2003) and substance use (Prinstein, Boergers, & Spirito, 2001), and directly, because

Pubertal timing and depressive symptoms

457

friendship between deviant peers is often more unstable (Dishion, Andrews, & Crosby, 1995). Adolescents who engage in early romantic dating may also be at heightened risk of depression by exposing themselves to interpersonal challenges such as dealing with conflicts, potential breakups, and emergent sexual attraction (Monroe, Rohde, Seeley, & Lewinsohn, 1999; Zimmer-Gembeck, Siebenbruner, & Collins, 2001). Furthermore, perceived peer acceptance or popularity is an important factor that could be associated with depression, because peer acceptance is closely related to selfesteem and satisfaction in peer relations (Litwack, Aikins, & Cillessen, 2010; Nolan et al., 2003). Finally, adolescents perception of perceived parental rejection was robustly found to be associated with depression, given the important role of family support in adolescent well-being (Khaleque & Rohner, 2002; Stice et al., 2004). However, few studies have investigated the interactions among interpersonal factors, personal risks, and pubertal maturation. In peer and romantic social contexts, Conley and Rudolph (2009) have found that pubertal timing (i.e., early timing for girls and late timing for boys) was related to depression 1 year later, but only at high levels of peer stress, a measure that evaluates peer experiences such as lack of friendships, poor-quality relationships, and social exclusion. Other studies indicated that early maturing girls displayed higher levels of psychological distress when they affiliated with mixed-gender friends; they also appeared more vulnerable, in terms of psychological distress, to the influences of deviant peer affiliation (Ge et al., 1996). In a recent study investigating developmental trajectories of depressed mood from early adolescence to young adulthood, adolescents boys and girls who experienced an off-time puberty (early or late) and reported dating experiences between 12 and 16 years of age were more likely to have an elevated depressed mood trajectory (Natsuaki et al., 2009). Regarding the interplay between pubertal timing and parentadolescent relationships, some evidences suggest that early maturing girls experiencing high levels of parental psychological control display more internalized problem behaviors (Arim & Shapka, 2008). Early maturing girls also appeared to be more vulnerable, in terms of psychological distress symptoms, to their fathers hostile feelings (Ge et al., 1996). Therefore, preliminary empirical findings suggest that the experience of early or off-time puberty could be related to a heightened risk of depression in challenging interpersonal environments. Because the present study focused on the association between interpersonal factors and depressive symptoms in late adolescence, it was important to control for variables that may be associated with puberty and adolescent depression, such as family adversity, family depression history, and childhood conduct problems. Family adversity includes measures of family socioeconomic status, nonintact family status, and family dysfunction. Children from lower socioeconomic status families, nonintact households, and dysfunctional family environments appeared more at risk for depressive manifestations during adolescence (Glied & Pine, 2002; Goodyer, Her-

bert, Tamplin, Secher, & Pearson, 1997; Reinherz, Paradis, Giaconia, Stashwick, & Fitzmaurice, 2003; Wallerstein, 1991). Moreover, a family history of depression is known to be an important predictor of later youth depression (Cummings & Davies, 1994; Hammen & Brennan, 2003; Reinherz et al., 2003). Finally, we also controlled for the childs conduct problems in late infancy, because several studies have pointed out a positive association between conduct problems in childhood and depression during adolescence (Capaldi & Stoolmiller, 1999; Hofstra, van der Ende, & Verhulst, 2002; Loeber & Keenan, 1994; Mason et al., 2004; Zoccolillo, 1992). The Current Study The first objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive validity of pubertal timing in early adolescence (1213 years) and depressive symptoms in late adolescence (1617 years), separately by gender. The second objective was to test whether the link between pubertal timing and depressive symptoms was moderated by a prepubertal individual factor, such as emotional problems in late childhood (personal-accentuation model), and by characteristics of peer and parent interpersonal contexts: deviant peer affiliation, early dating experience, perceived peer popularity, and perceived parental rejection (contextual-amplification model). Building on previous theoretical and empirical findings, it was hypothesized that an earlier pubertal timing would be significantly associated with depressive symptoms in adolescent girls. For boys, curvilinear association between pubertal timing (early and late) and depressive symptoms was investigated (Conley & Rudolph, 2009). Moreover, it was expected that the interactions not only between prepubertal emotional problems and pubertal timing but also between interpersonal factors and pubertal timing would predict depressive symptoms. The association between pubertal timing (earlier timing for girls; early and/or late timing for boys) and depressive symptoms was expected to be stronger in adolescents who experienced previous emotional problems during late childhood and who reported deviant peer affiliation, early romantic dating, lower perceived peer popularity, and higher levels of perceived parental rejection (personal-accentuation and contextual-amplification integrated models). Method Sample This study analyzed data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth (NLSCY), a representative and prospective survey investigating social, emotional, and behavioral development of Canadian children from infancy to adulthood (Human Resources Development Canada & Statistics Canada, 1996). Initiated in 19941995 (Cycle 1), the NLSCY uses a stratified sampling procedure to ensure a representation of children from various socioeconomic back-

458

A. Benoit, E. Lacourse, and M. Claes

grounds living in the 10 Canadian provinces. Children living in institutional settings, on First Nation reserves, and in some remote regions were excluded. In Cycle 1, from the 15,579 eligible families randomly selected, 13,349 Canadian households with children aged between 0 and 10 years agreed to participate, making for a response rate of 86.3%. Participants were grouped in different cohorts, according to age: 01 year, 23 years, 45 years, 67 years, 89 years, and 1011 years. This longitudinal sample was then followed every 2 years (Cycle 2: 19961997, Cycle 3: 19981999, Cycle 4: 2001 2002, Cycle 5: 20032004, and continuing). We selected a subsample of participants that included children from the two oldest cohorts, aged between 8 and 11 years at Cycle 1 (n 4,951). From this sample, we identified participants who were followed at four time points: ages 10 11 years (Time 1), ages 1213 years (Time 2), ages 1415 years (Time 3), and ages 1617 years (Time 4). Therefore, for the cohort of participants aged 1011 years at Cycle 1, we used data collected between Cycle 1 and Cycle 4, while for the cohort aged 1011 years at Cycle 2, we analyzed data collected between Cycles 2 and 5. A total of 2,921 participants fitted these criteria. Of this number, we selected only participants who had complete data available. The final sample consisted of 1,431 participants (653 boys, 778 girls) predominantly of Caucasian descent (more than 90% of the sample). Procedure Data were collected from families every 2 years between September and June by trained interviewers from Statistics Canada, in person or by phone. For participants under 17, the person most knowledgeable about the child (PMK), in most cases the mother (89.9% in this sample), was interviewed regarding several aspects of his or her child and family life. In addition, children 10 years and older were asked to complete a confidential self-reported questionnaire, at home or in the classroom. Participants filled out the questionnaire alone and gave it back to the interviewer in a sealed envelope. Participants were then assigned a personal identification number to ensure confidentiality. Attrition Logistic regression analyses were performed on the original sample at Cycle 1 (n 4,951) to identify which variables were associated with attrition. Results indicated that participants lost through attrition were more likely to come from families with a lower socioeconomic status (odds ratio [OR] 0.69; p , .001) and to display a higher frequency of conduct problems (OR 1.05; p , .001). Nonintact family status (OR 1.12; ns), childs emotional problems as reported by the parent (OR 0.98; ns), parental depression (OR 0.99; ns), or the quality of family functioning (OR 0.99; ns) were not significantly associated with attrition, however. All statistical analyses were conducted using normalized longitudinal survey weights provided by Statistics Canada. The use of survey weights is a method of handling missing

data that adjusts the importance of participants in the sample by calculating a value for each sample participant who represents his weight in the population. This strategy takes into account the NLSCYs stratified sampling strategy, attrition, nonresponse, age, sex, and province of residence in order to ensure the representativeness of the original sample (Human Resources Development Canada & Statistics Canada, 1996). Numerous studies with NLSCY samples successfully used this strategy to manage missing data (e.g., Browne, Odueyungbo, te , Borge, Geoffroy, RutThabane, Byrne, & Smart, 2010; Co re , Lacourse, Willms, Leventhal, ter, & Tremblay, 2008; Dupe re , Lacourse, Willms, Vitaro, & Trem& Tremblay, 2008; Dupe blay, 2007; Lacourse et al., 2010). Measures Depressive symptoms were self-reported at 1617 years of age. Late adolescence is an important period to investigate depressive symptoms because depression at this time of life is related to later depressive symptoms and mental health outcomes in adulthood (Fergusson, Horwood, Ridder, & Beautrais, 2005). Moreover, focusing on depressive symptoms at 1617 years of age allows assessment of the long-term impact of pubertal timing on depressive symptoms. Pubertal timing was measured at 1213 years of age. This specific time point was selected to increase variability in pubertal development in order to discriminate early as well as late maturers, which is more difficult when pubertal timing re et al., 2008). is measured at an early age (Dupe Emotional problems in late childhood were reported by the PMK when participants were 1011 years old, in order to consider personal prepubertal vulnerability to depressive symptoms. Peer and parent variables (deviant peer affiliation, early dating experience, peer popularity, and perceived parental rejection) were self-reported at 1415 years of age, to take interpersonal context following pubertal development into account. Family adversity, family history of depression, and childhood conduct problems were included as control variables and were also reported by the PMK at 1011 years of age. Depressive symptoms (ages 1617). Adolescents self-reporting of depressive symptoms was measured using a shortened 12-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Study Depression Scale (Radloff, 1977). Adolescents were asked to indicate the frequency of depressive symptoms in the past week on a scale ranging from 0 (rarely or never, less than 1 day a week) to 3 (most or all of the time, 57 days a week). Symptoms included depressive mood, anhedonia, feelings of worthlessness and isolation, difficulty to concentrate, loss of energy or fatigue, and appetite and sleep disturbances (e.g., I felt depressed, I felt hopeful about the future, My sleep was restless, or I felt that everything I did was an effort). Internal consistency was good (Cronbach a 0.83). Total scores ranged from 0 to 36, a higher score indicating a greater occurrence of depressive symptoms. This

Pubertal timing and depressive symptoms

459

12-item scale was found to have satisfactory validity and reliability in a sample of Canadian adolescents (Poulin, Hand, & Beaudreau, 2005). Pubertal timing (ages 1213). Pubertal development was self-reported by adolescents using a 5-item version of the Pubertal Development Scale (Petersen, Crockett, Richards, & Boxer, 1988), a widely used and well-validated measure of pubertal development. On a scale of 1 (development not started) to 4 (development completed), adolescent boys and girls rated the level of their body hair development. In addition, adolescent boys reported on their facial hair development and voice change while girls indicated their breast development and if they had experienced their first menarche (item coded dichotomously: no 1; yes 4). Cronbach alphas were 0.76 for boys and 0.73 for girls. Responses were summed and averaged by gender, giving a score between 1 and 4 corresponding to adolescents perceived level of pubertal development. Pubertal development scores were then standardized by age (12 or 13) and gender to provide a pubertal timing score (M 0, SD 1) that reflected adolescents level of pubertal development when compared to same-age and same-sex peers (Ge et al., 2001a; Graber & Brooks-Gunn, 1997). Scores varied between 3.13 and 3.68, with higher scores indicating an earlier pubertal development and lower scores referring to a later pubertal development in relation to peers. Prepubertal emotional problems (ages 1011). On a 3-point scale (0 never or not true, 1 sometimes or somewhat true, 2 often or very true), the PMKs reported how often their children displayed several signs of emotional problems at ages 1011 using a validated measure of 7 items (Achenbach, 1991; Offord & Lipman, 1996). Three items evaluated anxiety symptoms (e.g., Child is nervous, high-strung, or tense, and Child is worried) and 4 items assessed depressive symptoms (e.g., Child cries a lot, and Child seems to be unhappy, sad, or depressed). Internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach a) was 0.76. Summed scores varied between 0 and 21. Interpersonal relationships variables (ages 1415). Deviant peer affiliation. Deviant peer affiliation was assessed with a single item. Adolescents were asked how many of their friends break the law by stealing, hurting someone, or damaging property (0 none, 1 a few, 2 most, 3 all ). Adolescents were considered to be affiliating with deviant peers if they reported that a few, most, or all or their friends break the law (coded as 1 on a dichotomous variable). Single-item measures were found to have adequate validity in assessing deviant peer affiliation in adolescent samples (e.g., re et al., 2007; Lacourse, Nagin, Tremblay, Vitaro, & Dupe Claes, 2003; Lacourse et al., 2006). Early dating experience. Early dating experience was derived from 2 items of a larger scale investigating romantic re-

lationships and adolescents sexuality. Adolescents were first asked: Have you ever had a boyfriend or girlfriend? (0 no, 1 yes). If they answered yes, they had to answer the question: How old were you when you had your first boyfriend or girlfriend? Adolescents were considered to have early dating experience if they had had their first boyfriend/girlfriend at 13 years or younger (coded as 1) and not to have had early dating experience if they had never had a boyfriend/girlfriend or had had their first relationship at age 14 or 15 (coded as 0). A similar measure was used in previous studies examining the association between pubertal timing and dating experience (Joyner & Udry, 2000; Natsuaki et al., 2009). Perceived peer popularity. Adolescents perception of their popularity with peers was assessed using the peer relations subscale of the Marsh Self-Description Questionnaire (Marsh & Gouvernet, 1989). On a 5-point scale (0 false, 1 mostly false, 2 sometimes true/sometimes false, 3 mostly true, 4 true), adolescents rated 4 items about their friends and same-age acquaintances (e.g., I have many friends and Most others my age like me). The scale showed good internal consistency (a 0.85). Scores ranged from 3 to 16, with higher scores indicating a greater perception of popularity among peers. Perceived parental rejection. Adolescents perception of parental rejection was measured using a subscale of the Parenting Questionnaire (Lempers, Clark-Lempers, & Simons, 1989). This subscale assessed rejection-oriented parenting practices and disciplinary behaviors (e.g., My parents nag me about little things, My parents only enforce rules when it suits them, and My parents get angry and yell at me). Adolescents were asked to read the statements and indicate how often their parents had acted this way toward them in the past 6 months (0 never, 1 rarely, 3 sometimes, 4 often, 5 always). Cronbach alpha was 0.74. Scores varied between 0 and 28, with higher values reflecting higher perceived parental rejection. Family adversity, family history of depression, and childs conduct problems (ages 1011). Family socioeconomic status was reported by the PMK, and it reflected a combined score created by Statistics Canada (Willms & Shields, 1996). This score was derived from five aspects of family socioeconomic status: the highest levels of education the PMK and his or her spouse attained, the PMKs and the spouses levels of occupational prestige (Pineo, Porter, & McRoberts, 1977), and the household income. Each of the five indicators was standardized and integrated into a composite score, ranging from 3.08 to 2.82 in this sample. Family status was reported by the PMK and was coded 1 if the child lived in a nonintact family (divorced, separated, remarried, or widowed parents) and 0 if the child lived in an intact family (with both biological or adoptive parents). Parental depression was assessed with a shortened 12-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Study Depression Scale (Radloff, 1977). The

460

A. Benoit, E. Lacourse, and M. Claes

PMK indicated the frequency of depressive symptoms in the past week, such as depressive mood, concentration difficulties, and appetite and sleep problems (0 rarely or none of the time, 1 some or little of the time, 2 occasionally or a moderate amount of the time, 3 most or all of the time). Scores varied between 0 and 33, and the scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach a 0.89). This short version of the Center for Epidemiological Study Depression Scale had been previously used in studies on parental depression (e.g., Elgar, Mills, McGrath, Waschbusch, & Brownridge, 2007). Family dysfunction was measured using a 12item scale that assessed the quality of family interactions (e.g., communication, family roles, problem solving, affective involvement, affective responsiveness, and behavior control; Boyle et al., 1987). On a 4-point scale (0 strongly agree, 1 agree, 2 disagree, 3 strongly disagree), the PMK indicated how well the items described their family (e.g., In time of crisis, we can turn to each other for support, We are able to make decisions about how to solve problems, and We dont get along very well). Internal consistency of the scale was good (Cronbach a 0.88). Items were summed with positive items inversed. Scores varied between 0 and 34, higher scores reflecting more family dysfunction. The childs conduct problems were assessed with a 7-item scale from the Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach, 1991). The PMK was asked to report how often (0 never or not true, 1 sometimes or somewhat true, 2 often or very true) his or her child exhibited physically aggressive and nonphysically aggressive problems behaviors (e.g., Child gets into many fights, Child kicks, bites, or hits other children, and Child steals at home). Scale showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach a 0.71), with scores varying between 0 and 14. Analytical strategy A series of hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the additive and interaction effects of pubertal timing (ages 1213), prior emotional problems in late childhood (ages 1011), and peer and parent variables (ages 1415) on adolescents depressive symptoms (ages 1617). Preliminary multiple regression analyses were conducted to evaluate a possible curvilinear association between pubertal timing and depressive symptoms by simultaneously entering linear and curvilinear (quadratic term) pubertal timing variables. If evidence of curvilinear effects were found, linear and quadratic terms were kept for the following analyses, and if not, only the linear term was included. Multiple regression analyses were then performed in five steps. Control variables (family adversity, family history of depression, and childs conduct problems) were included in a first model. Emotional problems in late childhood and pubertal timing were then added in the second and third models. The fourth model included pubertal timing, emotional problems in late childhood, control variables, and the main effects of peer and parent variables. In subsequent models, two-way

interactions between emotional problems in late childhood and pubertal timing, as well as between peer and parental variables and pubertal timing were tested. Three-way interactions among emotional problems in late childhood, peer and parental variables, and pubertal timing were also explored. To avoid multicollinearity problems, interactions were tested in separate models. All continuous variables included in interactions were centered prior to calculating interaction terms. Significant two-way interactions were interpreted following the simple slope probing procedure by Holmbeck (2002), and significant three-way interactions were analyzed with a Dawson and Richter (2006) procedure to test significant differences between slopes. Only significant interactions are shown, with all previous variables included in the analyses. Results Descriptive statistics Table 1 presents descriptive statistics for control variables, pubertal timing, peer and parental variables, and depressive symptoms separately by gender. Significant gender differences were found: More adolescent boys than girls reported deviant peer affiliation, x2 (1, N 1,431) 10.81, p , .001, phi-2 0.007, and early dating experience at 1415 years of age, x2 (1, N 1,431) 6.64, p , .01, phi-2 0.004. However, adolescent girls perceived higher peer popularity, t (1,429) 2.63, p , .05, d 0.13, and less parental rejection than did boys, t (1,429) 2.67, p , .01, d 0.14. Adolescent girls also displayed higher scores of depressive symptoms at 1617 years of age than did boys, t (1,429) 5.25, p , .001, d 0.29. No gender difference was found at 1011 years of age regarding the childs emotional problems, as reported by the PMK, t (1,429) 1.22, ns. Analyses were conducted separately by gender. Preliminary data analyses revealed differences in the profiles of associations between variables according to gender. Some correlations between control/main variables and the outcome variable of depressive symptoms were significantly different between girls and boys (see r to z transformations in the bottom line of the correlations matrix, Table 2). Moreover, we conducted preliminary regression analyses to test the interactions between the main variables and sex. Some interactions were found to be significant: between early dating and sex (b 0.13, p , .01) and between perceived peer popularity and depressive symptoms (b 0.45, p , .01). The interaction between the quadratic term of pubertal timing and sex was found to be marginally significant (b 0.07, p , .10). The interactions between deviant peer affiliation and sex (b 0.04, ns) and between perceived parental rejection and sex (b 0.07, ns) were not found to be significant. These preliminary results suggested sex differences regarding the associations between key variables and depressive symptoms. Table 2 shows bivariate Pearson correlations between the variables, separately by gender. For adolescent girls, risk factors in late childhood, such as emotional (r .08, p , .01)

Pubertal timing and depressive symptoms

461

Table 1. Descriptive mean (standard deviation) or frequencies statistics for the study variables according to gender
Variables Control variables (ages 1011) Family SES Nonintact family Parental depression Family dysfunction Conduct problems Emotional problems Pubertal timing (ages 1213) Peer and parental variables (ages 1415) Deviant peer affiliation Early dating experience Peer popularity Parental rejection Outcome (ages 1617) Depressive symptoms
Note: SES, socioeconomic status.

Girls 0.06 (0.81) 26.8% 4.58 (6.12) 7.57 (4.74) 1.31 (1.88) 2.88 (2.63) 0 (1) 30.2% 55% 13.73 (2.37) 10.37 (4.52) 9.22 (5.58)

Boys 0.21 (0.77) 21.3% 4.01 (5.11) 7.91 (4.78) 1.76 (2.18) 2.71 (2.55) 0 (1) 38.5% 61.8% 13.38 (2.75) 11.04 (4.95) 7.67 (5.57)

Total Sample 0.13 (0.79) 24.2% 4.31 (5.69) 7.73 (4.76) 1.52 (2.03) 2.80 (2.59) 0 (1) 34.1% 58.2% 13.56 (2.55) 10.68 (4.74) 8.49 (5.63)

and conduct problems (r .16, p , .01), were significantly associated with depressive symptoms at ages 1617. Girls earlier pubertal timing at ages 1213 (r .10, p , .05), deviant peer affiliation (r .10, p , .05), early dating experience (r .13, p , .01), lower perceived peer popularity (r .15, p , .01), and higher perceived parental rejection at ages 1415 (r .23, p , .01) were also significantly related to higher scores of depressive symptoms at ages 16 17. For adolescent boys, family dysfunction (r .19, p , .01) and emotional problems in late childhood (r .14, p , .01) were significantly correlated with depressive symptoms at ages 1617, while pubertal timing was not (r .05, ns). Peer popularity (r .35, p , .01) and perceived parental rejection (r .30, p , .01) were significantly correlated with depressive symptoms, but deviant peer affiliation and early dating experience were not related to the latter.

depressive symptoms at ages 1617, with control variables held at their average values. Table 3 and Table 4 report the results of hierarchical multiple regression models, which tested the main and interactive effects of emotional problems in late childhood, peer and parental variables, and pubertal timing on adolescents depressive symptoms at 1617 years of age. Adolescent girls. In Table 3, Model 3 shows that an early pubertal timing was significantly associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms (b 0.08, p , .05), with control variables and emotional problems in late childhood included. In Model 4 the main effects of peer and parent variables were added. Having an early dating experience (b 0.10, p , .01) as well as perceiving less peer popularity (b 0.12, p , .001) and more parental rejection (b 0.18, p , .001) were significantly associated with more depressive symptoms. Deviant peer affiliation was not associated with depressive symptoms when other variables were added to the model (b 0.01, ns). In Model 5, one two-way interaction between perceived parental rejection and pubertal timing was found to be significant (b 0.07, p , .05). Using the Holmbeck (2002) procedure for testing simple slopes, we examined the association between pubertal timing and depressive symptoms at different levels of perceived parental rejection (at one SD below mean, at mean level, and at one SD above mean). Results indicated that pubertal timing was not significantly associated with depressive symptoms at low levels of perceived parental rejection (b 0.02, ns). However, pubertal timing was significantly and positively related to depressive symptoms at average levels of perceived parental rejection (b 0.08, p , .05), and the effect was found to be more pronounced at high levels of perceived parental rejection (b 0.15, p , .01). Figure 2a illustrates this interaction, with other variables of the model held at their average values.

Multivariate models Multivariate regression analyses were performed to detect possible linear and curvilinear associations between pubertal timing and depressive symptoms. Both linear and quadratic terms were entered simultaneously in a first step, with the control variables. For adolescent girls, results indicated that pubertal timing had a linear effect on depressive symptoms (b 0.08, p , .05), but no significant curvilinear effect was found (b 0.02, ns). For adolescent boys, pubertal timing was found to have a significant curvilinear association with depressive symptoms (linear term: b 0.04, ns; quadratic term: b 0.10, p , .01). Consequently, only linear pubertal timing variable was included in the girls models, while both linear and quadratic effects were taken into account in the boys models. Figure 1 illustrates the association between pubertal timing at ages 1213 and adolescent boys and girls

Table 2. Bivariate Pearson correlations among the study variables according to gender
1 1. Family SESa 2. Nonintact family statusa 3. Parental depressiona 4. Family functioninga 5. Conduct problemsa 6. Emotional problemsa 7. Pubertal timingb 8. Deviant peer affiliationc 9. Early dating experiencec 10. Peer popularityc 11. Parental rejectionc 12. Depressive symptomsd Fischer ze 2.33** 2.39** 2.20** 2.05 2.22 2.10** 2.19** 2.14** .21** 2.02 2.05 20.90 2 2.11** .29** .11** .04 .15** .12** .10** .13** 2.15** .09* .07 20.57 3 2.23** .13** .30** .05 .34** .05 .12** .10** 2.15** .03 .01 0 4 2.18** .13** .30** .06 .11** .03 .11** .02 2.02 .12** .06 2.29** 5 2.22** .13** .19** .18** .35** .07* .01 .02 2.16** .11** .16** 21.72* 6 2.06 .09** .26** .25** .35** .08* .08* .06** 2.19 .04 .08* 1.14 7 2.08 .04 2.04 .06 .01 2.06 .10** .03 2.02 2.01 .10** 20.95 8 2.12** .004 .08* 2.01 .05 .03 .002 .29** 2.06 .24** .10* 20.76 9 2.13** .05 .11** .03 .10* 2.06 .13** .25** .19** .18** .13** 22.65** 10 2.05 2.07 2.06** 2.04 2.10* 2.21** .17** .06 .19** 2.09* 2.15** 4.03** 11 2.08* .02 .06 .08* 2.02 .02 .01 .25** .11** 2.10** .23** 1.42 12 2.002 .04 .01 .19** .07 .14** .05 .06 2.01 2.35** .30**

462

Note: Statistics for boys are above the diagonal and for girls below the diagonal. a Ages 1011. b Ages 1213. c Ages 1415. d Ages 1617. e Fischer z testing the differences between boys and girls regarding the correlations between the variables of the study and depressive symptoms. p , .10. *p , .05. **p , .01.

Pubertal timing and depressive symptoms

463

Figure 1. The associations between pubertal timing (ages 1213) and depressive symptoms (ages 1617) for adolescent boys and girls.

In Model 6, a three-way interaction among late childhood emotional problems, early dating experience, and pubertal timing was found to be significant (b 0.13, p , .01). Figure 2b displays this interaction, with other variable of the model held at their average value. To interpret this interaction, different configurations of emotional problems at 10 11 years of age (low levels: 1 SD below mean; high levels: 1 SD above mean) and early dating experience (early dating experience vs. no early dating experience) were evaluated according to pubertal timing scores (earlier to later timing). Therefore, four slopes are displayed in Figure 2 (Slope 1: high level of emotional problems at ages 1011 early dating experience; Slope 2: high level of emotional problems at ages 1011 no early dating experience; Slope 3: low level of emotional problems at ages 1011 early dating experience; and Slope 4: low level of emotional problems at ages 1011 no early dating experience). Results indicated that only Slope 1 was significantly different from Slope 2 (t 2.85, p , .01), Slope 3 (t 2.96, p , .01) and Slope 4 (t 2.19, p , .05). Slopes 2, 3, and 4 were not significantly different from one another (2 and 3: t 0.08, ns; 2 and 4: t 0.71, ns; 3 and 4: t 0.85, ns). These results suggested that early pubertal timing was associated with more depressive symptoms but only in girls who presented emotional problems in late childhood and dating experiences in early adolescence. It is important to note that the two-way interaction between emotional problems in late childhood and pubertal timing was significant (b 0.07, p , .05). However, these results are not shown, because the three-way interaction Emotional Problems Early Dating Pubertal Timing was also significant. No other two-way interactions or three-way interactions were found to be significant. Adolescent boys. As shown in Model 3 (Table 4), a significant curvilinear association between pubertal timing and boys depressive symptoms was found (b 0.10, p , .01), with control variables and emotional problems in late childhood included. In Model 4, perceived peer popularity

(b 0.31, p , .001) and perceived parental rejection at 1415 years of age (b 0.26, p , .001) were significantly associated with depressive symptoms. Deviant peer affiliation and early dating experience were not significantly related to boys depressive symptoms. Moreover, when peer and parent variables were included in Model 4, the linear term of pubertal timing became significant (b 0.08, p , .05), while the quadratic term was no longer significant (b 0.03, ns). Inspection of the associations between variables indicated that this effect was the result of the inclusion of the peer popularity variable. This finding suggested that the link between later pubertal timing and depressive symptoms was partially explained by lower levels of perceived peer popularity. Three two-way interactions emerged as significant in subsequent models. As shown in Model 5, an interaction between emotional problems in late childhood and pubertal timing (quadratic) was found to be significant (b 0.13, p , .01). A test of simple slopes at different levels of emotional problems in late childhood (1 SD below mean, average level, and 1 SD above mean) indicated that the curvilinear association between pubertal timing and depressive symptoms was only significant at high levels of emotional problems (b 0.12, p , .01) and not at low (b 0.07, ns) or average levels (b 0.02, ns). Figure 3a displays this interaction, with other variables of the model held at their average value: offtime pubertal timing was associated with more depressive symptoms at 1617 years of age, but only in boys who already displayed high levels of emotional problems in late childhood. In Model 6, a significant interaction between deviant peer affiliation and pubertal timing (linear term) was found (b 0.11, p , .05). A test of simple slopes showed that the linear effect of pubertal timing on depressive symptoms was not significant when adolescent boys reported no affiliation with deviant peers (b 0.02, ns). In the context of affiliation with deviant peers, pubertal timing (linear term) was significantly and positively associated with depressive symptoms (b 0.21, p , .001). This interaction is illustrated in Figure 3b,

464

A. Benoit, E. Lacourse, and M. Claes

Table 3. Multiple regression testing main and moderating effects of emotional problems in late childhood, peer and parental variables, and pubertal timing on depressive symptoms in adolescent girls (n 778)
Model 1 Variables B (SE) Step 1 (R2 .03) Family SES Nonintact family status Parental depression Family functioning Conduct problems Step 2 (R2 .03) Emotional problems Step 3 (R2 .04) Pubertal timing Step 4 (R2 .10) Deviant peer affiliation Early dating experience Peer popularity Parental rejection b B (SE) 0.15 (0.28) 0.74 (0.49) 0.05 (0.04) 0.07 (0.04) 0.45(0.11)*** 0.04 (0.09) b B (SE) b B (SE) b 0 .01 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.12 0.004 0.08 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4

0.16 (0.28) 0.02 0.74 (0.49) 0.06 0.04 (0.04) 0.05 0.07 (0.04) 0.06 0.47 (0.11)*** 0.16

0.02 0.11 (0.28) 0.02 0.07 (0.28) 0.06 0.64 (0.49) 0.05 0.20 (0.48) 0.05 0.04 (0.04) 0.05 0.04 (0.04) 0.06 0.07 (0.04) 0.06 0.05 (0.04) 0.15 0.43 (0.11)** 0.15 0.35 (0.11)** 0.02 0.03 (0.09) 0.45 (0.20)* 0.03 0.08 0.01 (0.08) 0.48 (0.20)*

0.12 (0.46) 0.01 1.17 (0.42)** 0.10 0.28 (0.09)** 0.12 0.22 (0.04)*** 0.18 Model 5 B (SE) b Model 6 B (SE) b

Step 1 (R2 .01) Family SES 0.05 (0.27) 0.01 Nonintact family status 0.21 (0.48) 0.02 Parental depression 0.05 (0.04) 0.06 Family functioning 0.05 (0.04) 0.04 Conduct problems 0.34 (0.11)** 0.11 Step 2 (R2 .01) Emotional problems 0.02 (0.08) 0.01 Step 3 (R2 .01) Pubertal timing 0.48 (0.20)* 0.08 Step 4 (R2 .10) Deviant peer affiliation 0.04 (0.46) 0.002 0.16 (0.46) 0.01 Early dating experience 1.17 (0.41)*** 0.10 1.11 (0.41)** 0.10 Peer popularity 0.27 (0.09)* 0.12 0.26 (0.09)** 0.11 Parental rejection 0.23 (0.04)*** 0.18 0.22 (0.04)*** 0.18 Step 5a (R2 .11) Pubertal Timing Parental Rejection 0.08 (0.04)* 0.07 Step 5b (R2 .12) Emotional Problems Pubertal Timing 0.08 (0.11) 0.04 Early Dating Pubertal Timing 0.60 (0.39) 0.07 Early Dating Emotional Problems 0.19 (0.16) 0.07 Emotional Problems Early Dating Pubertal Timing 0.40 (0.16)** 0.13
Note: All analyses controlled for cohorts membership. Step 1: control variables at ages 1011; Step 2: emotional problems at ages 1011; Step 3: pubertal timing at ages 1213; Step 4: peer and parent variables at ages 1415. DR2 : Model 2: .00, p .625; Model 3: .01, p .021; Model 4: .06, p .000; Model 5: .01, p .04; Model 6: .02, p .007. SES, socioeconomic status. *p , .0. **p , .01. ***p , .001.

which shows that when boys affiliate with deviant peers, early maturers are more likely to report depressive symptoms. An interaction between perceived parental rejection and pubertal timing (linear) emerged as significant (b 0.08, p , .05) in Model 6. Interpretation of this interaction suggested that the lin-

ear association between pubertal timing and depressive symptoms was not significant at low levels of perceived parental rejection (b 0.002, ns). Pubertal timing was significantly and positively related to depressive symptoms at average levels of perceived parental rejection (b 0.08, p , .05), and the associa-

Pubertal timing and depressive symptoms

465

Table 4. Multiple regression testing main and moderating effects of emotional problems in late childhood, peer and parental variables, and pubertal timing on depressive symptoms in adolescent boys (n 653)
Model 1 Variables B (SE) b B (SE) b B (SE) 0.20 0.14 0.08 0.21 0.04 b B (SE) 0.17 (0.27) 0.13 (0.47) 0.09 (0.04)* 0.19 (0.04)*** 0.03 (0.10) 0.09 (0.09) 0.47 (0.20)* 0.11 (0.16) 0.06 (0.43) 0.16 (0.42) 0.63 (0.08)*** 0.29 (0.04)*** Model 6 b B (SE) b Model 7 B (SE) 0.08 0.22 0.10 0.19 0.03 b b 0.02 0.01 0.08 0.16 0.01 0.04 0.08 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.31 0.26 Step 1 (R2 .06) Family SES 0.20 (0.29) 0.03 Nonintact family status 0.17 (0.52) 0.01 Parental depression 0.07 (0.05) 0.06 Family functioning 0.23 (0.05)*** 0.20 Conduct problems 0.10 (0.10) 0.04 Step 2 (R2 .07) Emotional problems Step 3 (R2 .08) Pubertal timing Pubertal timing (quadratic) Step 4(R2 .24) Deviant peer affiliation Early dating experience Peer popularity Parental rejection Model 5 B (SE) Step 1 (R2 .08) Family SES Non-intact family status Parental depression Family functioning Conduct problems Step 2 (R2 .08) Emotional problems Step 3 (R2 .02) Pubertal timing Pubertal timing (quadratic) Step 4 (R2 .24) Deviant peer affiliation Early dating experience Peer popularity Parental rejection Step 5a (R2 .26) Emotional Problems Pubertal Timing Emotional Problems Pubertal Timing (quadratic) Step 5b (R2 .25) Deviant Peer Affiliation Pubertal Timing Deviant Peer Affiliation Pubertal Timing (quadratic) Step 5c (R2 .25) Parental Rejection Pubertal Timing Parental Rejection Pubertal Timing (quad.) Model 2 Model 3 Model 4

0.15 (0.29) 0.02 0.15 (0.52) 0.01 0.09 (0.05) 0.08 0.22 (0.05)*** 0.19 0.03 (0.11) 0.01 0.21 (0.09)* 0.10

(0.29) 0.03 (0.52) 0.01 (0.05) 0.07 (0.05)*** 0.18 (0.11) 0.01 0.09 0.04 0.10

0.20 (0.09)* 0.24 (0.21) 0.44 (0.17)**

0.18 (0.27) 0.02 0.24 (0.47) 0.02 0.08 (0.04) 0.08 0.18 (0.04)*** 0.16 0.03 (0.10) 0.01 0.09 (0.11) 0.47 (0.20)* 0.10 (0.16) 0.04 0.08 0.02

0.10 (0.27) 0.01 0.15 (0.47) 0.01 0.09 (0.04)* 0.08 0.19 (0.04)*** 0.16 0.04 (0.10) 0.02 0.09 (0.09) 0.11 (0.24) 0.23 (0.20) 0.04 0.02 0.05

(0.27) 0.01 (0.47) 0.02 (0.04)* 0.09 (0.04)*** 0.16 (0.10) 0.01 0.04 0.08 0.02

0.09 (0.08) 0.42 (0.20)* 0.09 (0.16) 0.06 0.25 0.64 0.29

0.05 (0.42) 0.004 0.27 (0.53) 0.02 0.17 (0.42) 0.01 0.17 (0.42) 0.02 0.62 (0.08)*** 0.31 0.63 (0.08)** 0.31 0.29 (0.04)*** 0.26 0.30 (0.04)*** 0.26 0.11 (0.07) 0.16 (0.06)** 0.06 0.13 1.02 (0.40)* 0.36 (0.32) 0.11 0.06

(0.42) 0.004 (0.42) 0.02 (0.08)*** 0.31 (0.05)*** 0.26

0.09 (0.04)* 0.001 (0.03)

0.08 0.002

Note: All analyses controlled for cohorts membership. Step 1: control variables at ages 1011; Step 2: emotional problems at ages 1011; Step 3: pubertal timing at ages 1213; Step 4: peer and parent variables at ages 1415. DR2 : Model 2: .01, p.021; Model 3: .01, p .001; Model 4: .16, p .001; Model 5: .02, p .007; Model 6: .01, p .023; Model 7: .01, p .07 ( p .021 excluding interaction with pubertal timing-quadratic term). SES, socioeconomic status.

466

A. Benoit, E. Lacourse, and M. Claes

interplay of individual and social domains when evaluating the risk for depression associated with pubertal timing. Personal-accentuation models Results of this study contributed to our understanding of the potential long-term effect of pubertal timing on depressive symptoms by showing that the association between pubertal timing and depressive symptoms was only significant in adolescents who had already experienced emotional problems in late childhood. By taking into account that adolescents enter puberty with diverse preexisting individual risk conditions, these results support the accentuation model (Caspi & Moffitt, 1991). Preexisting individual vulnerabilities could be accentuated during a transitional period, such as when early (girls) or off-time puberty (boys) increased the frequency of depressive symptoms in adolescents with emotional problems in childhood (Caspi & Moffitt, 1991; Ge et al., 1996). Therefore, pubertal maturation is not necessarily a stressful or difficult transition for all early or off-time maturers, but it may be particularly challenging for adolescents with vulnerabilities to depression. Contextual-amplification models Some evidence, found in this study, sheds light on the complex longitudinal associations between pubertal timing and the frequency of depressive symptoms in adolescence by showing that the potential detrimental effect of pubertal timing is amplified by interpersonal characteristics in the broader social context of peers and family. In line with Person Environment interactions and biopsychosocial models of puberty and development (Graber, 2003; Magnusson, 1988; Rudolph, 2009), these results confirm previous findings by indicating that pubertal timing is associated with depressive symptoms primarily within specific interpersonal and social contexts (e.g., Ge et al., 1996; Natsuaki et al., 2009). Contextual amplification effects were observed, because higher levels of depressive symptoms were found in early maturing adolescents who experienced early dating (girls), deviant peer affiliation (boys), and perceived parental rejection (girls and boys) but not in early maturing youth who did not exhibit these interpersonal factors. Even if we did not directly test the underlying mechanisms accounting for these interactions, some hypotheses can be proposed. It could be hypothesized that these social contexts constitute potential sources of interpersonal stress that are particularly challenging for early maturers (Conley & Rudolph, 2009). Physical transformations associated with pubertal development imply changes in adolescents self-perceptions (Brooks-Gunn, 1984), which are influenced by social contexts surrounding adolescents (Graber, 2003; Magnusson & Cairns, 1996). Early maturing adolescents have to manage an emergent sexual interest, a more mature physical appearance compared to their chronological age, and a redefinition of their interactions with parents and peers at a younger age. This developmental context could be demanding if associated with interpersonal difficulties or

Figure 2. The associations between pubertal timing (ages 1213) and girls depressive symptoms (ages 1617) as a function of (a) perceived parental rejection and (b) emotional problems in late childhood and early dating experience.

tion was stronger at high levels of perceived parental rejection (b 0.16, p , .01). This interaction indicated that early maturing boys are more likely to display depressive symptoms if they perceived higher levels of perceived parental rejection. This interaction is displayed in Figure 3c. No other two-way or threeway interactions were found to be significant for adolescent boys. Discussion Using a representative longitudinal sample of Canadian boys and girls followed over a 6-year period, the aim of this study was to test personal-accentuation and contextual-amplification models of pubertal timing. Complex interactions among prepubertal individual risk, interpersonal factors, and pubertal timing emerged, showing that a potential detrimental effect of pubertal timing is substantially dependant on individual and contextual influences. Moreover, this study extends our understanding of these models by providing evidence for a joint

Pubertal timing and depressive symptoms

467

Figure 3. The associations between pubertal timing (ages 1213) and depressive symptoms (ages 1617) as a function of (a) emotional problems in late childhood, (b) deviant peer affiliation (ages 1415), and (c) perceived parental rejection (ages 1415).

precarious social environments (e.g., deviant peer context or perceived parental rejection). However, the pattern of results found for adolescent boys suggests that early and late pubertal timing may be linked to depressive symptoms for various reasons. After including the main effects of the social environments in the model, the curvilinear association between pubertal timing and depressive symptoms was no longer significant, specifically because of the inclusion of the peer popularity variable. Although not expected, this result suggested a partial mediation effect: Lower perceived peer popularity may account for the association between later pubertal maturation and depressive symptoms. Because evidence indicates that late maturing boys tend to be more psychologically immature in terms of ego development (Lindfors et al., 2007) and treated as being younger than their age because of their physical appearance (Johnson & Collins, 1988), they may struggle more than others for peer acceptance. This hypothesis needs to be explored in further studies. However, a significant interaction between affiliation with deviant peers and pubertal timing indicated that when adolescent boys reported affiliation with deviant peers, early maturers were more likely to display depressive symptoms than were their peers. Fergusson et al. (2003) found that adolescents

who affiliated with deviant peers showed more depressive symptoms. These authors proposed a causal chain process where deviant peer affiliation increases externalizing problems, which, in turn, further increase the risk of depression. It is possible that this process may be intensified in early maturing boys who associate with deviant peers, because boys with early maturation tend to engage more intensively in delinquent activities and substance use (Ge, Brody, Conger, Simons, & Murry, 2002; Kaltiala-Heino et al., 2003). Moreover, early maturing boys are more likely to be popular among peers (Felson & Haynie, 2002) and perhaps, consequently, more vulnerable to peer pressure (Allen, Porter, McFarland, Marsh, & McElhaney, 2005; Santor, Messervey, & Kusumakar, 2000). This may explain why early maturers tend to display more depressive symptoms in a context of deviant peer influences. For both boys and girls, the association between an earlier pubertal timing and depressive symptoms was exacerbated if adolescents reported higher levels of perceived parental rejection. Some previous studies have revealed that early pubertal timing is associated with intensified family conflicts and parentadolescent emotional distance (Steinberg, 1987). However, if earlier pubertal timing may be associated with more family conflicts, it does not seem to be associated with major

468

A. Benoit, E. Lacourse, and M. Claes

relationships problems, such as perception of parental rejection, because pubertal timing was not significantly correlated with perceived parental rejection in this study. Some hypotheses might explain the possibility of heightened interpersonal vulnerability to depressive symptoms for early maturers in this context. For instance, the development of secondary sex characteristics, which are signs of sexual and social maturity, often initiates changes in parentadolescent interactions regarding affective manifestations, communication processes, and parental control (Paikoff & Brooks-Gunn, 1991). Although this renegotiation of the parentadolescent relationship is normative, it may affect early maturers more if they also perceive rejection from their parents. Moreover, as proposed by the biopsychosocial perspective, the difficulties elicited by early puberty appear to be intensified in difficult interpersonal contexts characterized by a high level of perceived parental rejection; a low level of perceived parental rejection in turn seems to buffer the potential risk associated with adolescents early puberty. An integrated perspective on the contribution of personal and contextual factors Preexisting individual vulnerabilities and interpersonal contexts contribute to increase or decrease the risk for subsequent depression associated with pubertal timing in late adolescence. This study extends these perspectives by suggesting that personal-accentuation and contextual-amplification processes may occur simultaneously. A significant three-way interaction was found, indicating that girls earlier pubertal timing was associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms, but this was only in girls who exhibited emotional problems in late childhood and experienced early dating. These results are in line with previous findings that suggest bidirectional links between internalizing symptoms and early romantic dating. Although romantic dating and having mixed-sex peers in early adolescence appears quite normative, it has been linked to an increased risk of depression (Joyner & Udry, 2000), particularly in early maturing girls (Ge et al., 1996). Early adolescents may lack the skills to cope with romantic stress and to regulate emotions that could arise from rejection or interpersonal conflicts (Davila, 2008; Joyner & Udry, 2000). At the same time, depressed adolescents who get involved in romantic relationships are more likely to do so as a coping mechanism to find support or to satisfy dependency needs, an interpersonal context that could increase their depressive symptoms (Davila et al., 2009; Gotlib, Lewinsohn, & Seeley, 1998). The present results suggested that girls early pubertal timing may be an important feature to be considered in conjunction with antecedents of emotional problems and early romantic involvement. Limitations and implications for future research Some limitations need to be taken into account. First, the effect of pubertal timing and its interactions with contextual and per-

sonal variables explained a small part of the variance in the frequency of depressive symptoms (1% to 2% of explained variance). However, such small effects are to be expected when interactions are found in nonexperimental studies (McClelland & Judd, 1993), particularly in the pubertal development field (Alsaker, 1996). Moreover, the significant interactions indicated that the effect of pubertal timing may explain a larger part of variance in depressive symptoms within some social context. For example, in girls, an earlier pubertal timing is associated with more important change in depressive symptoms within adolescents who perceived parental rejection (b 0.15, p , .01) than in all adolescent girls (b 0.07, p , .05). Second, the extent of some measures was limited, because the NLSCY is a large-scale survey assessing a wide range of aspects of child and adolescent development. For example, pubertal development was measured with a shortened version of the Pubertal Development Scale, and early dating experience and deviant peer affiliation were measured with single items. Multiple measures of pubertal development, such as Tanner stages and items directly assessing perceived pubertal timing, would have been helpful to define more precise connections between pubertal timing and depressive symptoms. Third, the use of normalized longitudinal weights to handle missing data and ensure the representativeness of the initial sample may not have eliminated all problems associated with attrition (e.g., more children with conduct problems were lost through attrition). However, this strategy is a valuable and widely used method to produce valid estimates in large surveys like the NLSCY. Fourth, pubertal timing, peer and parent variables, as well as depressive symptoms were self-reported and therefore share some common variance that may lead to an overestimation of the associations among these variables. Unfortunately, we did not have access to measures of adolescent depression and interpersonal relationships from multiple informants. However, many studies have shown that adolescents appear to be valid and reliable informants of their own depressive state. Other informants, such as parents, tend to underestimate internalizing symptoms in adolescents (Seiffge-Krenke & Kollma, 1998; Verhulst & Van der Ende, 2006), which can substantially reduce interindividual differences. Moreover, because parents or teachers may not be well informed of adolescents social interactions with peers (e.g., dating experiences or friends deviancy), the inclusion of self-report data on these dimensions is important. The use of self-report measures was also relevant to this study because it specifically examined the links between self-perceived characteristics of adolescent social life and depressive symptoms. Self-perceptions of interpersonal contexts are crucial in understanding the frequency of depressive symptoms (Rudolph, 2009). Our findings suggest multiple independent pathways toward depression in adolescence. Therefore, it is plausible that multiple trajectories of depression exist for early and off-time maturing youth in conjunction with different social contexts and individual vulnerability factors (Natsuaki et al., 2009). Further studies should examine physiological

Pubertal timing and depressive symptoms

469

processes involved in pubertal timing and explain why it is related to depression in some social contexts. Some evidence suggests that patterns of physiological reactivity may differ according to pubertal timing. For example, early maturing young women appear to experience more physiological stress and less physiological recovery (measured by cortisol levels) when facing high levels of interpersonal conflicts in a discussion task with their romantic partner (Smith & Powers, 2009). It is therefore possible that pubertal timing influences the physiological reactivity to stress in particular interpersonal contexts and eventually contributes to emotional disturbances. These complex interactions between physiological and interpersonal factors related to pubertal timing merit further investigation. Despite these limitations, this prospective longitudinal study deepens our understanding of the long-term association between pubertal timing and depressive symptoms. By adopting a biopsychosocial and transactional perspective, our findings add to the emerging body of evidence indicating that interactions among personal preexisting risk conditions, social contexts, and pubertal timing predict depressive symptoms in

adolescence. This theoretical framework offers important avenues in evaluating how the pubertal transition shapes the adolescent experience and especially in which social contexts depressive symptoms are more likely to be observed, because early or off-time maturation does not confer a similar risk for depression in late adolescence. The results also have implications for prevention and intervention in adolescent depression. By drawing attention to particular combinations of biological, individual, and interpersonal characteristics associated with depressive symptoms, our findings may help to identify adolescents who are more vulnerable to pubertal transition. In particular, attention should be given to adolescents with a history of emotional problems during late childhood and who experienced early or off-time puberty. Moreover, characteristics of peer, romantic, and parental contexts, such as early dating experience, deviant peer affiliation, and perceived parental rejection, should be taken into account because these contexts may be related to a higher risk of depressive symptoms in adolescence, especially if paired with early pubertal development.

References
Abela, J. R. Z., & Hankin, B. L. (2008). Handbook of depression in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/418 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry. Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., McFarland, F. C., Marsh, P., & McElhaney, K. B. (2005). The two faces of adolescents success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76, 747. Alsaker, F. D. (1995). Timing of puberty and reactions to pubertal changes. In M. Rutter (Ed.), Psychosocial disturbances in young people: Challenges for prevention (pp. 3782). New York: Cambridge University Press. Alsaker, F. D. (1996). Annotation: The impact of puberty. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 249258. Arim, R. G., & Shapka, J. D. (2008). The impact of pubertal timing and parental control on adolescent problem behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 445455. Beck, A. T., & Alford, B. A. (2009). Depression: Causes and treatments (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Boyle, M. H., Offord, D. R., Hofman, H. E., Catlin, G. P., Byles, J. A., Cadman, D. T., et al. (1987). Ontario child health study: I. Methodology. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 826831. Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., & Bukowski, W. (2000). Deviant friends and early adolescents emotional and behavioral adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 173189. Brooks-Gunn, J. (1984). The psychological significance of different pubertal events to young girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 4, 315327. Brooks-Gunn, J., Petersen, A. C., & Eichorn, D. (1985). The study of maturational timing effects in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 14, 149161. Browne, D. T., Odueyungbo, A., Thabane, L., Byrne, C., & Smart, L. A. (2010). Parenting-by-gender interactions in child psychopathology: Attempting to address inconsistencies with a Canadian national database. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 4, 113. Capaldi, D., & Stoolmiller, M. (1999). Co-occurrence of conduct problems and depressive symptoms in early adolescent boys: III. Prediction to young-adult adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 59 84. Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (1991). Individual differences are accentuated during periods of social change: The sample case of girls at puberty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 157168. Compian, L., Gowen, L. K., & Hayward, C. (2004). Peripubertal girls romantic and platonic involvement with boys: Associations with body image and depression symptoms. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14, 2347. Conley, C. S., & Rudolph, K. D. (2009). The emerging sex difference in adolescent depression: Interacting contributions of puberty and peer stress. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 593620. Costello, E., Mustillo, S., Erkanli, A., Keeler, G., & Angold, A. (2003). Prevalence and development of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 837. te , S., Borge, A. I., Geoffroy, M. C., Rutter, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2008). Co Nonmaternal care in infancy and emotional/behavioral difficulties at 4 years old: Moderation by family risk characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 44, 155168. Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (1994). Maternal depression and child development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 73112. Davila, J. (2008). Depressive symptoms and adolescent romance: Theory, research, and implications. Child Development Perspectives, 2, 2631. Davila, J., Stroud, C. B., Starr, L. R., Ramsey Miller, M., Yoneda, A., & Hershenberg, R. (2009). Romantic and sexual activities, parentadolescent stress, and depressive symptoms among early adolescent girls. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 909924. Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917926. Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W., & Crosby, L. (1995). Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. Child Development, 66, 139151. re , V., Lacourse, E., Willms, J. D., Leventhal, T., & Tremblay, R. E. Dupe (2008). Neighborhood poverty and early transition to sexual activity in young adolescents: A developmental ecological approach. Child Development, 79, 14631476. re , V., Lacourse, E., Willms, J. D., Vitaro, F., & Tremblay, R. E. (2007). Dupe Affiliation to youth gangs during adolescence: The interaction between childhood psychopathic tendencies and neighborhood disadvantage. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 10351045. Elgar, F. J., Mills, R. S. L., McGrath, P. J., Waschbusch, D. A., & Brownridge, D. A. (2007). Maternal and paternal depressive symptoms and child maladjustment: The mediating role of parental behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 943955. Felson, R. B., & Haynie, D. L. (2002). Pubertal development, social factors, and delinquency among adolescent boys. Criminology, 40, 967988. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, J. L., Ridder, E. M., & Beautrais, A. L. (2005). Subthreshold depression in adolescence and mental health outcomes in adulthood. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 6672.

470
Fergusson, D. M., Wanner, B., Vitaro, F., Horwood, L. J., & Swain-Campbell, N. (2003). Deviant peer affiliations and depression: Confounding or causation? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 605618. Ge, X., Brody, G. H., Conger, R. D., Simons, R. L., & Murry, V. M. B. (2002). Contextual amplification of pubertal transition effects on deviant peer affiliation and externalizing behavior among African American children. Developmental Psychology, 38, 4254. Ge, X., Conger, R. D., & Elder Jr., G. H. (1996). Coming of age too early: Pubertal influences on girls vulnerability to psychological distress. Child Development, 67, 33863400. Ge, X., Conger, R. D., & Elder Jr., G. H. (2001a). Pubertal transition, stressful life events, and the emergence of gender differences in adolescent depressive symptoms. Developmental Psychology, 37, 404417. Ge, X., Conger, R. D., & Elder Jr., G. H. (2001b). The relation between puberty and psychological distress in adolescent boys. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11, 4970. Ge, X., Kim, I. J., Brody, G. H., Conger, R. D., Simons, R. L., Gibbons, F. X., et al. (2003). Its about timing and change: Pubertal transition effects on symptoms of major depression among African American youths. Developmental Psychology, 39, 430439. Glied, S., & Pine, D. S. (2002). Consequences and correlates of adolescent depression. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 156, 1009 1014. Goodyer, I. M., Herbert, J., Tamplin, A., Secher, S. M., & Pearson, J. (1997). Short-term outcome of major depression: II. Life events, family dysfunction, and friendship difficulties as predictors of persistent disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 474 480. Gotlib, I. H., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Seeley, J. R. (1998). Consequences of depression during adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 686690. Graber, J. A. (2003). Puberty in context. In C. Hayward (Ed.), Gender differences at puberty (pp. 307325). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Graber, J. A., Lewinsohn, P. M., Seeley, J. R., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1997). Is psychopathology associated with the timing of pubertal development? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 17681776. Graber, J. A., Seeley, J. R., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (2004). Is pubertal timing associated with psychopathology in young adulthood? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 718726. Hammen, C., & Brennan, P. A. (2003). Severity, chronicity, and timing of maternal depression and risk for adolescent offspring diagnoses in a community sample. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 253258. Harrington, R., Fudge, H., Rutter, M., Pickles, A., & Hill, J. (1991). Adult outcomes of childhood and adolescent depression: II. Links with antisocial disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 434. Hayward, C., Killen, J. D., Wilson, D. M., & Hammer, L. D. (1997). Psychiatric risk associated with early puberty in adolescent girls. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 255262. Hofstra, M. B., van der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2002). Child and adolescent problems predict DSM-IV disorders in adulthood: A 14-year followup of a Dutch epidemiological sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 182189. Holmbeck, G. N. (2002). Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27, 8796. Human Resources Development Canada & Statistics Canada. (1996). Growing up in Canada: National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada. Johnson, B., & Collins, W. (1988). Perceived maturity as a function of appearance cues in early adolescence: Ratings by unacquainted adults, parents, and teachers. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 357. Joyner, K., & Udry, J. R. (2000). You dont bring me anything but down: Adolescent romance and depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 369391. , M. (2003). Kaltiala-Heino, R., Marttunen, M., Rantanen, P., & Rimpela Early puberty is associated with mental health problems in middle adolescence. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 10551064. Kessler, R. C., Avenevoli, S., & Ries Merikangas, K. (2001). Mood disorders in children and adolescents: An epidemiologic perspective. Biological Psychiatry, 49, 10021014.

A. Benoit, E. Lacourse, and M. Claes

Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R. P. (2002). Perceived parental acceptance rejection and psychological adjustment: A meta analysis of cross cultural and intracultural studies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 5464. re , V., Vitaro, F., Romano, E., & TremLacourse, E., Baillargeon, R., Dupe blay, R. E. (2010). Two-year predictive validity of conduct disorder subtypes in early adolescence: A latent class analysis of a Canadian longitudinal sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 1386 1394. Lacourse, E., Nagin, D., Tremblay, R. E., Vitaro, F., & Claes, M. (2003). Developmental trajectories of boys delinquent group membership and facilitation of violent behaviors during adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 183197. te , S., Arseneault, L., & Tremblay, Lacourse, E., Nagin, D. S., Vitaro, F., Co R. E. (2006). Prediction of early-onset deviant peer group affiliation: A 12-year longitudinal study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 562568. Lempers, J. D., Clark-Lempers, D., & Simons, R. L. (1989). Economic hardship, parenting, and distress in adolescence. Child Development, 60, 25 39. Lindfors, K., Elovainio, M., Wickman, S., Vuorinen, R., Sinkkonen, J., Dunkel, L., et al. (2007). Brief report: The role of ego development in psychosocial adjustment among boys with delayed puberty. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 601612. Litwack, S. D., Aikins, J. W., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). The distinct roles of sociometric and perceived popularity in friendship: Implications for adolescent depressive affect and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence. Advance online publication. Loeber, R., & Keenan, K. (1994). Interaction between conduct disorder and its comorbid conditions: Effects of age and gender. Clinical Psychology Review, 1994, 497523. Magnusson, D. (1988). Individual development from an interactional perspective: A longitudinal study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Magnusson, D., & Cairns, R. B. (1996). Developmental science: Toward a unified framework. In R. B. Cairns, G. Elder, & J. Costello (Eds.), Developmental science (pp. 730). New York: Cambridge University Press. Marsh, H., & Gouvernet, P. (1989). Multidimensional self-concepts and perceptions of control: Construct validation of responses by children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 5769. Mason, W., Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T., Lengua, L. J., & McCauley, E. (2004). Predicting depression, social phobia, and violence in early adulthood from childhood behavior problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 307315. McCabe, M. P., & Ricciardelli, L. A. (2004). A longitudinal study of pubertal timing and extreme body change behaviors among adolescent boys and girls. Adolescence, 39, 145167. McClelland, G., & Judd, C. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376. Miller, L., & Gur, M. (2002). Religiosity, depression, and physical maturation in adolescent girls. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 206214. Monroe, S. M., Rohde, P., Seeley, J. R., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (1999). Life events and depression in adolescence: Relationship loss as a prospective risk factor for first onset of major depressive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 606614. Mussen, P. H., & Jones, M. C. (1957). Self-conceptions, motivations, and interpersonal attitudes of late-and early-maturing boys. Child Development, 28, 243256. Mussen, P. H., & Jones, M. C. (1958). The behavior inferred motivations of late- and early-maturing boys. Child Development, 29, 6167. Natsuaki, M. N., Biehl, M. C., & Ge, X. (2009). Trajectories of depressed mood from early adolescence to young adulthood: The effects of pubertal timing and adolescent dating. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 4774. Nolan, S. A., Flynn, C., & Garber, J. (2003). Prospective relations between rejection and depression in young adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 745755. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1994). The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 424443. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Hilt, L. M. (2009). Handbook of depression in adolescents. New York: Routledge. Offord, D., & Lipman, E. (1996). Emotional and behavioural problems. In Growing up in Canada: National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. Report No. 1205-6847. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.

Pubertal timing and depressive symptoms

Paikoff, R. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1991). Do parentchild relationships change during puberty? Psychological Bulletin, 110, 4766. Peskin, H. (1967). Pubertal onset and ego functioning. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 115. Peskin, H. (1973). Influence of the developmental schedule of puberty on learning and ego functioning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2, 273290. Petersen, A. C., Compas, B. E., Brooks-Gunn, J., Stemmler, M., Ey, S., & Grant, K. E. (1993). Depression in adolescence. American Psychologist, 48, 155168. Petersen, A. C., & Crockett, L. (1985). Pubertal timing and grade effects on adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 14, 191206. Petersen, A. C., Crockett, L., Richards, M., & Boxer, A. (1988). A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 117133. Pineo, P., Porter, J., & McRoberts, H. A. (1977). The 1971 census and the socioeconomic classification of occupations. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 14, 91102. Poulin, C., Hand, D., & Beaudreau, B. (2005). Validity of a 12-item version of the CES-D used in the National Longitudinal Study of Children and Youth. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 26, 6572. Prinstein, M. J., Boergers, J., & Spirito, A. (2001). Adolescents and their friends health-risk behavior: Factors that alter or add to peer influence. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 26, 287298. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385401. Reinherz, H. Z., Paradis, A. D., Giaconia, R. M., Stashwick, C. K., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2003). Childhood and adolescent predictors of major depression in the transition to adulthood. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 21412147. Rierdan, J., & Koff, E. (1991). Depressive symptomatology among very early maturing girls. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20, 415425. Rudolph, K. (2009). The interpersonal context of adolescent depression. In S. Nolen-Hoeksema & L. Hilt (Eds.), Handbook of depression in adolescents (pp. 377418). New York: Routledge. Rudolph, K. D., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2010). Personal-accentuation and contextual-amplification models of pubertal timing: Predicting youth depression. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 433451. Santor, D. A., Messervey, D., & Kusumakar, V. (2000). Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: Predicting school performance, sexual attitudes, and substance abuse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 163182. Sarigiani, P. A., & Petersen, A. C. (2000). Puberty and biological maturation. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3946). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Seiffge-Krenke, I., & Kollma, F. (1998). Discrepencies between mothers and fathers perceptions of sons and daughters problems behaviour: A longitudinal analysis of parentadolescent agreement on internalising and externalising problem behaviour. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 687697. Siegel, J. M., Yancey, A. K., Aneshensel, C. S., & Schuler, R. (1999). Body image, perceived pubertal timing, and adolescent mental health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 25, 155165.

471
Smith, E. S., & Powers, S. I. (2009). Off-time pubertal timing predicts physiological reactivity to postpuberty interpersonal stress. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 441458. Steinberg, L. (1987). Impact of puberty on family relations: Effects of pubertal status and pubertal timing. Developmental Psychology, 23, 451460. Stice, E., Presnell, K., & Bearman, S. (2001). Relation of early menarche to depression, eating disorders, substance abuse, and comorbid psychopathology among adolescent girls. Developmental Psychology, 37, 608 619. Stice, E., Ragan, J., & Randall, P. (2004). Prospective relations between social support and depression: Differential direction of effects for parent and peer support? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 155159. Susman, E. J., Dorn, L. D., & Schiefelbein, B. L. (2003). Puberty, sexuality, and health. In R. M. Lerner & M. A. Easterbrooks (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Developmental psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 295324). New York: Wiley. Taga, K. A., Markey, C. N., & Friedman, H. S. (2006). A longitudinal investigation of associations between boys pubertal timing and adult behavioral health and well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 401411. Verhulst, F. C., & Van der Ende, J. (2006). Agreement between parents reports and adolescents self-reports of problem behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 10111023. Wallerstein, J. S. (1991). The long-term effects of divorce on children: A review. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 349360. Weichold, K., Silbereisen, R. K., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2003). Shortterm and long-term consequences of early versus late physical maturation in adolescents. In C. Hayward (Ed.), Gender differences at puberty (pp. 241276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Weissman, M. M., Wolk, S., Goldstein, R. B., Moreau, D., Adams, P., Greenwald, S., et al. (1999). Depressed adolescents grown up. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 17071713. Wichstrm, L. (1999). The emergence of gender difference in depressed mood during adolescence: The role of intensified gender socialization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 232245. Williams, J. M., & Currie, C. (2000). Self-esteem and physical development in early adolescence: Pubertal timing and body image. Journal of Early Adolescence, 20, 129149. Willms, J. D., & Shields, M. (1996). A measure of socioeconomic status for the National Longitudinal Study of Children. Unpublished manuscript, Statistics Canada. Wittchen, H. U., Nelson, C. B., & Lachner, G. (1998). Prevalence of mental disorders and psychosocial impairments in adolescents and young adults. Psychological Medicine, 28, 109126. Zahn-Waxler, C., Klimes-Dougan, B., & Slattery, M. (2000). Internalizing problems of childhood and adolescence: Prospects, pitfalls, and progress in understanding the development of anxiety and depression. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 443466. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Siebenbruner, J., & Collins, W. A. (2001). Diverse aspects of dating: Associations with psychosocial functioning from early to middle adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 313336. Zoccolillo, M. (1992). Co-occurrence of conduct disorder and its adult outcomes with depressive and anxiety disorders: A review. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 547556.