0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
109 просмотров1 страница
Proficient Used proper vocabulary to state question or problem. Apprentice did not state problem in student's own words. No clear way to prove or disprove hypothesis by performing experiment.
Proficient Used proper vocabulary to state question or problem. Apprentice did not state problem in student's own words. No clear way to prove or disprove hypothesis by performing experiment.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Proficient Used proper vocabulary to state question or problem. Apprentice did not state problem in student's own words. No clear way to prove or disprove hypothesis by performing experiment.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Lab Work-Purpose: Used clear, accurate Used proper vocabulary Stated question or Did not state question or Defines goal of language to restate to state question or problem using incorrect problem. experiment question or problem in problem. vocabulary. Did not state student\'s own words. problem in student\'s Provided examples of own words. similar experiments. Lab Work-Hypothesis: Obvious connection Hypothesis and problem No connection between Hypothesis was missing Prediction between between the problem were clearly connected. hypothesis and or was unrelated to the experiment and results and predicted outcome. Hypothesis refuted or experiment. No clear experiment. Did not Provided references defended established way to prove or disprove mention dependent and showing that hypothesis knowledge. Variables hypothesis by independent variables. refutes or defends were identified and performing experiment. established knowledge. classified as dependent Variables were not Variables were identified and independent. completely described or and classified as were incorrectly dependent and classified as dependent independent. or independent. Lab Work-Materials Made complete list of Made complete list of Did not list one or two List of materials was and Equipment: materials used. materials used. Showed items used. Did not missing or showed only List of materials used Explained why materials information about size show details about items a few of the materials were chosen. and units of used. used. measurement. Lab Work-Methods: Setup was documented Setup included Description was general Setup was not described Description of process completely. Method was descriptive text and or did not include or documented. Step-by- and setup also documented diagrams were provided diagrams. Procedure step procedure was completely and if appropriate. was missing multiple missing or inadequate. accurately, making Experiment can be steps. Information experiment easy to reproduced using the provided is not sufficient reproduce. steps provided. to replicate experiment. Lab Work-Data Quality: All data was complete All data was complete Data was incomplete. Included little or no Accurate measurement and accurately labeled. and accurately labeled. Some data was not relevant data. Data was and labeling Data sampled at Data was sampled at labeled using not labeled using appropriate intervals as appropriate intervals. appropriate units of appropriate units of defined in Methods measure. Data sampling measure. Data sampling section of lab report. intervals inadequate to intervals were random support hypothesis. or inadequate. Lab Work-Data Identified and described Identified valid trends Only identified obvious Trends were missing or Analysis: trends and made and made appropriate trends or found trends were not supported by Student analyzed data appropriate conclusions conclusions based on not fully supported by the data collected. and identified trends based on the data. Used the data. Documented the data. Obvious trends were statistical techniques to calculations made during overlooked. identify and disregard data analysis. flawed data. Showed calculations. Lab Work-Conclusion: Restated problem and Problem was restated. Problem was restated. Original problem was not Summarizes findings hypothesis. Justified Statements and Conclusions were restated. Findings were and compares actual design and methods of conclusions were based simplistic. not summarized. results with expected experiment. Findings on the data collected. No clear relationship Conclusions were not results were discussed in detail. Showed a strong between conclusions relevant to hypothesis. Conclusions directly relationship between and hypothesis. address hypothesis. conclusions and Statements and hypothesis. conclusions were supported by the data.