Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
It is absolutely vital that you follow fair and transparent procedures in disciplinary and grievance matters. If you fail to do so, you could find yourself judged to have dismissed someone unfairly.
Good procedures will enable you to stay on the right side of the law and enable you to deal with disciplinary and grievance issues consistently and fairly, with a view to sorting them out before they become serious. This briefing covers:
1. 2. 3.
The legal requirements. When the procedures apply. Drawing up disciplinary rules.
1.1 Make sure employees can find out about your disciplinary rules.
Inform employees where they can see the rules. For example, in a handbook or displayed on a staff noticeboard.
You cannot reasonably complain if someone breaks a rule they did not know existed.
Take time to consider your findings and carry out a follow-up investigation if required. Any appeal should, if possible, be heard by someone senior, who was not involved in the first hearing.
In deciding on penalties, it is important to be consistent and reasonable - you can take mitigating circumstances into account.
If you treat people differently for the same offence, you must be able to explain why.
1.4 You must use fair and reasonable procedures when dealing with disciplinary and grievance issues.
Your procedures should ideally comply with the Acas Code of Practice which sets out principles for handling discipline and grievance issues in the workplace.
Failure to follow the Code of Practice could be very expensive. Put your procedures down in writing and give all employees access to a copy.
Train managers to enable them to handle grievances effectively. Try to resolve grievances informally.Many issues can be solved by simply talking them through.
Where informal measures do not resolve the grievance, the employee should put the grievance in writing. Arrange a face-to-face meeting to discuss the problem.The employee has the right to be accompanied.
Decide on any necessary action. If the employee is not happy with the outcome, he or she can appeal. Any appeal should be heard by someone impartial not involved in the original hearing. Keep a written record of the case.Ensure they are kept confidentially.
When meeting with the employee against whom the allegations have been made, remind him/her of his/her right to be accompanied by a trade union representative or work colleague. Ensure that the employee understands the allegations that have been made. Ask him/her to respond to these allegations and produce evidence to support his/her response. Use open questions to gain information, clarify the issues e.g. what happened then? and to check your understanding of what has been said Note: A police investigation may delay investigation or disciplinary action under the West Berkshire Council/school procedure. Where a police investigation is being undertaken seek further advice from HR.
West Berkshire Council Undertaking an Investigation January 2007
the case with the Head of Service/Headteacher as this could prevent them from hearing any subsequent appeal. Your report should be clear, concise and presented in a logical format. It should: Outline the allegations Provide full supporting evidence. Make sure you include all the relevant facts so that it would make sense to someone unfamiliar with the case. Include those facts favourable to the employee. Contain a summary of events as evidenced by your investigation, referring to supporting evidence in the appendices as appropriate. Make recommendations based on the findings of your investigation you can recommend that the case is: Dropped Handled informally Considered at a disciplinary hearing Appendix 2 provides a suggested format for the investigation report.
West Berkshire Council Undertaking an Investigation January 2007
Staffing levels Type of clients (if applicable) Workload and shift pattern Allegations: These should be very specific: Date, time, place of the alleged incident(s) Refer to the employee by name Specify the nature of the misconduct/allegations Investigation: Who conducted the investigation (Your name, job title and service area/position in school) How the allegations were brought to your attention How you carried out your investigation Refer to witness statements, and clarify why these are relevant What other sources of information you accessed Statement of case From the information that you have gathered, take each allegation and present the sequence of events cross referencing to documents/statements within the appendices as appropriate: Highlight the salient points of statements If appropriate, clarify the line managers expectations of what should have happened Explain the correct procedures Demonstrate whether the employee had received sufficient training, support and information to meet these expectations and comply with procedures Refer to any additional supporting evidence Consider the employees explanation of what happened Consider any mitigating factors
West Berkshire Council Undertaking an Investigation January 2007
Day 1
Allegations are made
By Day 2
Employee advised of allegations (by line manager) Preliminary investigation carried out if appropriate and allegations confirmed to employee (by line manager) Investigating Officer appointed
By Day 5
Witness statements requested by Investigating Officer Relevant records accessed Statement and records examined by investigating officer
By Day 7
Investigation interviews planned and arranged and employee / witnesses advised of dates
are entitled to speak for the grievant and to stop the meeting at any time to confer with the member. Tips for Presenting the Grievance: Use a positive direct approach; Stick to the subject of the grievance; Try to resolve grievances at the lowest possible level; Focus on issues not personalities; Remain calm cool, and collected; Get every settlement in writing; State what you believe the resolution is.