Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
320# psf which would be the cohesion value of the saturated clay encountered to a
depth of about 45'. qu, therefore = 640# and the safe shearing value would be
640 x 1.67 = 1070# which is very close to the 17'-5" water head that caused failure.
of more than 50' failed under a water test of 18'. The unconfined compression test of
a sample obtained from this site showed failure at 564#. Therefore, the safe shear-
ing head would be 564 x 1.67 = 940# which approaches closely the 18' head water
From these results we must conclude that for soils coming within the
category of saturated clays the safe allowable shearing load should be, p = 1.67 xqu.
8) The value of Pmax for a square of circular footing placed on the surface
of the ground, (Formula 20), is Pmax = 7.95c For a rectangular footing below ground
(Formula 19):
hb
P = 5.52 (1 +0.38+0.44)
m c b L
P = 5.70c (21)
max x '
To use these formulas for building foundations, the factor of safety must
oe taken into consideration. This factor of safety should be based on the sensitivity
of the clay to remolding. This sensitivity equals the unconfined compression strength
remolding of the sample following the procedure previously outlined. For instance,
in the case of the Cochin unconfined compression test, the undisturbed strength
was 564# psf and the remolded strength 172# psf. Therefore, the sensitivity of this
172
The Cochin clay comes within the medium sensitivity range and the
factor of safety for permanent structures would be 2.7. If the foundation were
placed directly on the ground, Pmax for this soil would be:
564
The safe allowable load would then amount to ~yy~= 830# psf
to the value that would be obtained from Table 1, Chapter I. Using this table and
interpolating for the qa value for qu, .28 tons ( 564) we obtain about 720# psf for a
Naturally, one must also take into consideration the settlement factors
37