Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

1.

The Comparative Effects of Valsartan and Amlodipine on vWf Levels and N/L Ratio in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Hypertension High levels of circulating Von Willebrand factor (vWf) and increased neutrophil to lymphocyte (N/L) ratio may reflect vascular inflammation in hypertensive patients. In present study, we aimed to investigate the effects of valsartan as an angiotensin II receptor antagonist and amlodipine as a calcium channel blocker on the vWf levels and N/L ratio in patients with essential hypertension. Patients were randomized to one of the following intervention protocols: calcium channel blocker (amlodipine, 510 mg/day) as group A (n = 20 mean age = 51.85 11.32 y) and angiotensine II receptor blocker (valsartan, 80320 mg/day) as group B (n = 26 mean age = 49.12 14.12 y). Endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation were evaluated with vWf levels and N/L ratio in hypertensive patients before treatment and after treatment in the 12th week. No statistically significant differences were found among the groups in terms of age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). There was a significant decrease in vWf levels (P < .001) and N/L ratio after treatment (P = .04, P < .001, respectively) in both the groups. Von Willebrand factor levels and N/L ratio are very important markers having a role in vascular inflammation and antihypertensive treatment with amlodipine and valsartan may improve cardiovascular outcomes by decreasing these biomarkers.

Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/10641963.2012.758734?p revSearch=Title%253A%2528valsartan%252Camlodipine%2529&searchHistoryK ey=

2. The Comparative Effects of Valsartan and Amlodipine on Vascular Microinflammation in Newly Diagnosed Hypertensive Patients Pentraxin 3 (PTX3) is a new candidate immunoinflammatory marker that has been reported to be associated with cardiometabolic risk factors. We aimed to investigate the effects of valsartan and amlodipine on the PTX3 and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients with essential hypertension. Patients with a newly diagnosed essential hypertension were admitted to our internal medicine outpatient clinic. Patients were randomized to one of the following intervention protocols: calcium channel blocker (amlodipine, 510 mg/day) as group A (n = 22; mean age standard deviation [SD]: 52 11 year) and angiotensine II receptor blocker (valsartan, 80 320 mg/day) as group B (n = 28; mean age SD: 50 14 year). Endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation were evaluated with PTX3 and CRP. There was a significant decrease in the level of PTX3 after treatment in two groups

(P < .05). Although there was a significant decrease in the level of CRP after treatment in amlodipine group, there was no significant decrease in the levels of PTX3 and CRP after treatment in two groups. There were no significant differences in the systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction between the two treatment groups. In the treatment of hypertension, prior knowledge of the level of plasma PTX3 could be important in antihypertensive drug choice. C-reactive protein and PTX3 are the markers that have role in vascular inflammation and are found associated with the prognosis of cardiovascular outcomes in many trials. In our study, PTX and CRP levels were decreased when compared to baseline levels.

Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/10641963.2012.739237?prev Search=Title%253A%2528valsartan%252Camlodipine%2529&searchHistoryKey=

3. Meta-analysis of three observational studies of amlodipine/valsartan in hypertensive patients with additional risk factors Objectives. In this study, the effectiveness of amlodipine/valsartan single-pill combination was assessed in hypertensive patients with diabetes, metabolic risk or overweight. Methods. Data from 12,265 patients treated with amlodipine/valsartan from three studies were analyzed in a meta-analysis. These studies focused on (i) non-diabetic hypertensive patients suffering from abdominal obesity; (ii) hypertensive patients with at least one metabolic risk factor; and (iii) hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The observation periods were 16 weeks for the first two and 24 weeks for the latter cohort. Results. At start of observation, the mean blood pressure was 162.3 mmHg (systolic) and 93.5 mmHg (diastolic). A total of 7.4% of patients were aged 80 years. At end of the observation, a normalized blood pressure was present in 38.8% of patients. No appreciable differences in blood pressure reduction were evident between the study groups. In both age subgroups (< 80 years and 80 years) blood pressure reduction was comparable. Tolerability was assessed by treating physicians as very good (69.3%) and good (27.3%). Conclusions. In daily practice, treatment of hypertensive patients with additional risk factors with amlodipine/valsartan singlepill combinations is well tolerated and associated with effective reduction of blood pressure. Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/08037051.2013.793891?prev Search=Title%253A%2528valsartan%252Camlodipine%2529&searchHistoryKey=

4. Efficacy and Safety of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blocker/Calcium Channel Blocker Combination Therapy for Hypertension: Focus on a Single-Pill Fixed-Dose Combination of Valsartan and Amlodipine Abstract Adequate lowering of blood pressure reduces the risk of hypertension-induced cardiovascular events. Worldwide, blood pressure is not optimally controlled and more effective management is needed. The efficacy and tolerability of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) have led to their widespread use. Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are highly effective antihypertensives and amlodipine has a long half-life in the circulation. The combination of an ARB with a CCB as a single-pill, fixed-dose treatment is emerging as possibly the best therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease. Although many kinds of ARB are used in such combinations, amlodipine is mainly used as the CCB. Thus, differences in safety and efficacy among single-pill ARB/CCBs depend mainly on the ARB. Not all ARBs have the same effects and some of these may be molecular (or differential) rather than class (or common) effects. This review discusses the safety and efficacy of ARB/CCB combination therapy, with particular focus on a single-pill, fixed-dose combination of valsartan/amlodipine.

5. A Review of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Amlodipine/Valsartan in Non-White Patients with Hypertension Keith C. Ferdinand, Samar A. Nasser Abstract This article discusses racial/ethnic disparities in hypertension, with particular focus on non-white populations including blacks, Hispanics/Latinos, and Asians. Hypertension and its related morbidity and mortality affect a disproportionate number of black patients compared with white patients. Blacks, Hispanics/Latinos, and Asians have poor rates of hypertension awareness, treatment, and control. Given the high prevalence of comorbidities (e.g., obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome) in these populations, reninangiotensinaldosterone system blockers are a good choice for foundation therapy. This review also discusses the importance of adherence and persistence with antihypertensive medication, which remain suboptimal in these non-white populations. Evidence suggests improvement with the use of single-pill combination therapy. Lastly, clinical trial data on the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the combination of a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker and an angiotensin receptor blocker, a widely utilized combination, in non-white populations are presented. PubMed was searched using the title/abstract key words (amlodipine AND valsartan AND [hypertension OR hypertensive] AND [black(s) OR African American(s) OR Hispanic(s) OR Latino(s) OR Mexican(s) OR Asian(s)]). In total, eight studies in patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension were identified (n = 1,111 black, n = 389 Hispanic/Latino, and n = 3,094 Asian). Results showed that treatment with the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan is a reasonable choice for initial therapy or in patients who fail to respond to monotherapy. These drug classes have complementary mechanisms of action and, when used concomitantly, the magnitude of blood

pressure lowering in these non-white populations is generally comparable with that seen in non-Hispanic white patients.

Вам также может понравиться