Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Ms Heather Brooke
Sent via email
Email address: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Dear Ms Brooke
I am writing in respect of your recent enquiry for information held by the Authority
under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Please find herewith
the following:
Your request
I am writing to request information about the process of building and delivering the
new website www.birmingham.gov.uk. Specifically I would like to know:
Many public authorities release their contracts with private vendors in line with the
Freedom of Information Act. The exemption for commercial interest under the Act
(section 43) is a qualified exemption, which means information can only be withheld if
it is in the public’s interest. The public have an interest in knowing the terms of
contracts awarded by public authorities, whether or not public money changes hands
immediately.
If you are relying on section 41 (the exemption for legal breach of confidence) then I
would like to know the following:
• When these confidentiality agreements were agreed
• All correspondence and email in which these confidentiality agreements were
discussed.
• The precise wording of the confidentiality agreements
Finally, within the law of confidence there is also a public interest test. Therefore, the
contracts should be disclosed in full. If any parts are redacted they must be for
information that can be proven to be a legal breach of confidence in court, and only
then where secrecy can be shown to be in the public interest. These are difficult
positions to argue when public money is at stake or where a public authority is
offering a private company a monopoly to charge its stakeholders.
Response
1. The date on which the work began.
The first web project began in August 2005 when approval was sought from Cabinet
for the procurement and implementation of a web service solution (see copy of report
- attachment 1). Since the original report the scope of the website has changed in
line with technology improvements and the changing needs of the council and its
citizens. In its current scope the project began in March 2008 (see summary of
timeline - attachment 2).
2. The initial delivery date and the new estimated date the work will be completed.
The estimate in the Cabinet report for the original project was that it would initially
take 7 months i.e. until March 2006. In its current modified scope the project was
scheduled for completion in October 2008 and then revised to complete by March
2009. It is now expected to complete in August 2009. Further detail is included in
timeline – attachment 2.
3. The initial cost estimate of the work and the current cost.
The original Cabinet approval in the summer of 2005 was for £580k and further
approval was obtained in the summer of 2006, following additional detailed work of
£1,622k. This gave an "approved budget" of £2.202m including £281k for the cost of
parallel running (i.e. revenue).
Subsequently, we have agreed further spend of £601k for developments not included
in the agreed specification (£362k on a shared basis with Service Birmingham);
external testing (£54k); training & technical authoring (£66k); system testing (£47k);
and additional resource (£73k) funded from available ICT and BT budgets. This
gives the latest estimated of currently approved spend of £2.803m.
The project is a joint one between the city and the city’s technology partner, Service
Birmingham (the council’s joint venture with Capita). The technical system
development work for the project in its current scope is primarily being undertaken by
Service Birmingham and the company’s 3rd party contractors, to a specification
owned by and with the direct support of the Birmingham City Council web team.
The checking of content as a result of content migration and new content is being
undertaken by staff (web content editors) in each directorate of the council, roles they
would undertake as part of their standard jobs.
5. If any contracts are related to this job, copies of these (including all indexes,
appendices and supplements).
Under the terms of the joint venture arrangements, Service Birmingham has
responsibility for web services development as outlined in the Service Delivery
Agreement dated 28th March 2006. All contracts are between Service Birmingham
and the relevant contractor(s); therefore they do not fall under the scope of the FOI
Act.
The appropriate limit specified in the regulations is £450.00. This represents the
estimated cost of one person spending 18 hours in determining whether the
department holds the information, and locating, retrieving and extracting the
information. Consequently, the Council is not obliged by the Freedom of Information
Act 2000 to respond to your request see section 12(1).
However, you may wish to narrow the scope of your request, so the Council may be
able to provide the information free of charge because it would cost less than the
appropriate limit to do so. Any reformulated request the department receives from
you will be treated as a fresh FOI request.
If you are not satisfied with the response you may ask for an internal review. If
subsequently you are not satisfied with the Council’s decision you may apply to the
Information Commissioner for a decision. Generally, the ICO cannot make a decision
unless you have exhausted the complaints procedure provided by the Council. The
Information Commissioner can be contacted at the following address:
Yours sincerely
The information provided is subject to Birmingham City Council copyright, however, it may be re-used
for personal, educational or non-commercial purposes without further reference to the City Council. If
the re-use is for other purposes, such as commercial re-use, you should notify the City Council in writing
to seek approval or agree terms for re-use. Where Birmingham City Council does not hold the copyright,
it has indicated the copyright holder. Permission for re-use should be sought from them directly.