SUSAN HERBERT

Plaintiff-Appellant

Versus

BARACK OBAMA, JOHN ROBERTS

AND THE US
Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------------
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida

BEFORE: BLACK, CARNES, and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

On the Court's own motion, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED as frivolous

and

entirely without merit. See 11th Cir. R. 42-4. Appellant's "Motion to Exceed

Page/Word Limitations" is DENIED AS MOOT. (Dated August 3rd, 2009).

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

MOTION TO RECONSIDER YOUR OWN DESTINY AND FATE THAT

IS: Appellant motions this court to reconsider sentencing their own persons to the death
penalty upon a charge of treason which will eventually come about or be realized as
"stupid" like "ignorant" is not an excuse under our law: I entered this court already
having won my case and this court has acted upon one criminal idea alone: This court
truly believes that I and then WE, the People will put up with this
unconstitutional garbage, YOU AND YOUR IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW ACTIONS,
if only you, the illegally sitting federal court, a part of the corporation US, can stop the

1
People, the living government, from knowing. This court does not possess that power
under US law or in this universe as that power, as it is absolute, is reserved for the exactly
named Creator. This court cannot DISMISS or render MOOT what is inalienable and so
has been granted to We, the People thus I by the Creator and then The Founders as they
placed it in writing. It always was, always is and always will be mine as long as I do not
allow judges who seem to be on the same side as the criminals to steal it from me or to
run away and hide when they finally meet their match, a woman who is a victim thus
their better as now she has all of the legal power and the moral authority you do not as
crooks are not legal and moral by their very natures. Knowledge you need to process and
own to then reconsider your own case not mine IF you wish to escape the penalty of
death exactly named for the crime known as treason within our Constitution:

1. I am seeking to restore original jurisdiction. O.J. is not solely the right of a court to
hear the case; I only let you believe that as I have zero indication you would ever obey
the law on my behalf if the stakes are teeney-tiny let alone this large: o.j. is the right of
the people to FIRE the trustees of the corporation for violating the trust. Need to fire the
corporate officers of the US? Then the shortest distance between two points is a straight
line so walk a straight path and then do it: Go directly to SCOTUS. It is our inalienable
right to dissolve you and abolish you as the form is an idea in your head which you act
upon thus making it real. This would be exactly worded and is a math problem as
outlined in the following, American history and my original thought but taken from a
website and a group of lawyers calling themselves TeamLaw as we have been working on
this simultaneously so I discovered them after I made my case as I knew you would
underestimate me as that is the fatal mistake all traitors make thus I sought out people
who could and would support my case and my application of the law in light of the actual
not made up or wholly denied historical facts. The Declaration? Fact and law. The
Constitution? Fact and law. Marbury v Madison? Fact and law. The Action known as
11/20/08? Fact and law, it’s all fact and law and so is history, as Roberts action proves me
to be me the living embodiment of the law in both letter or President and spirit or
Commander as Roberts could not act unless I informed him first thus we know the paper
exists as does the law:

“Historical Review: In 1993 we discovered the original jurisdiction State Governors’

seats were vacant. I (Eric William Madsen) ran for office in Colorado; and in 1994, I was
elected Governor by Colorado’s Electors. I lawfully accepted the election and was
seated in the original jurisdiction Governor’s seat. At that same time, Roy Romer was
elected as Governor of the more commonly recognized private corporation known as,

2
“The State of Colorado” (Corp. State). The Corp. State courts then started to subpoena
me to come and testify as the Governor of the original jurisdiction Republic State. I
responded to most those subpoenas and so testified. After finding it next to impossible
to beat us in court, the Corp. State’s sub-corporation, Arapaho County, determined that if
they could get funding from the United States Congress they could possibly beat us. On
review, Congress sent the matter to the National Security Council who handed the
matter over to the Military’s Joint Chiefs for review. About two weeks later, the Chief
of the Joint Chiefs responded, “What Governor Madsen is doing out their in
Colorado is legal, lawful and correct; and, if they accomplish what they have set
out to do we will recognize that President of The United States of America as the
President of The United States of America, Commander in Chief of the military and
give them full military support.” Though the National Security Council is purely an
advisory committee, having no legislative or judicial effect; the fact remains, they
recognized the truth and responded with it to Congress who sent the supplicants away
without funding; after that, the Corp. State started to leave us alone. The Corp. State
and its courts, the United States 10th District Court, the United States Congress, the
United States National Security Council and the Joint Chiefs of the United States of
America’s military all recognized, reviewed and accepted my election as the original
jurisdiction Governor of Colorado. After serving as Colorado’s original jurisdiction
Governor for four years, I was lawfully appointed to The United States of America’s
original jurisdiction Senate, so I retired from the Governor’s Office having served a full
term. The next original jurisdiction Governor of Colorado, Robert Shell, followed me into
Office and confirmed my appointment to the original jurisdiction Senate. From around
the country, 41 other Governors have since been elected in their respective offices.
Other Senators were seated as I was and I was elected by them as the original
jurisdiction Senate’s President pro tempore, where I still serve. An original jurisdiction
Republic State Governor, can appoint and seat that State’s original jurisdiction
National Senators, who can in turn elect and seat an original jurisdiction President
of the United States of America, which has not been done since 1913. Until I was
elected, the States had not had Governors seated since at least 1968. The main reason
you see the problems our nation faces today is the people have forgotten what our
actual government is and they instead act as if these private foreign controlled
corporations (Corp. U.S. and the Corp. States) are their government. It’s why the States
are not using our national money system. It’s why we are caught up in wars and rumors
of war. It is why Corp. U.S. is exactly following the pattern set in Adolf Hitler’s Germany,
most recently by setting up a national personal identification system and the “Homeland
Security Police” system after the pattern of Hitler’s “State Security Police” the dreaded
SS. Historical Outline:

1st: Martial Law is declared by President Lincoln on April 24th, 1863, with General
Orders No. 100; under martial law authority, Congress and President Lincoln institute
continuous martial law by ordering the states (people) either conscribe troops and or
provide money in support of the North or be recognized as enemies of the nation; this
martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today. This martial law authority gives the
President (with or without Congress) the dictatorial authority to do anything that can be
done by government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America.
This conscription act remains in effect to this very day and is the foundation of
Presidential Executive Orders authority; it was magnified in 1917 with The Trading with
the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106,
October 6, 1917). and again in 1933 with the Emergency War Powers Act, which is

3
ratified and enhanced almost every year to this date by Congress. Today these Acts
address the people of the United States themselves as their enemy.

2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a “municipal corporation” to
govern the District of Columbia. Considering the fact that the municipal government
itself was incorporated in 1808, an “Organic Act” (first Act) using the term “municipal
corporation” in 1871 can only mean a private corporation owned by the municipality.
Hereinafter we will call that private corporation, “Corp. U.S.” By consistent usage, Corp.
U.S. trademarked the name, “United States Government” referring to themselves. The
District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 places Congress in control (like a corporate
board) and gives the purpose of the act to form a governing body over the municipality;
this allowed Congress to direct the business needs of the government under the existent
martial law and provided them with corporate abilities they would not otherwise have.
This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the
ten mile square of the District of Columbia. Follow this link to see the effect of the
District of Columbia Act of 1871.

3rd: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution),
which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of
America) except that it was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment and the
national constitution's 14th, 15th and 16th amendments are respectively numbered 13th,
14th and 15th amendments in the Corp. U.S. Constitution. At this point take special
notice and remember this Corp. U.S. method of adopting their own Constitution, they will
add to it in the same manner in 1913.

4th: Corp. U.S. began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912, but
they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded
payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled the debt for the payments
of all of Corp. U.S.' assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of
America.

5th: As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business
needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrow
some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they
would not repay their debts in full). The families had foreseen this situation and had the
year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name "Federal Reserve
Bank". Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they
could transact their business via note rather than with money. Notice that this
relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve
government; that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank
system—again it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that set the
whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is found illegal or
impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements
remain in full force and effect.

6th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. adopts (as if
ratified) their own 16th amendment. Tax protesters challenge the IRS tax collection
system based on this fact, however when we remember that Corp. U.S. originally
created their constitution by simply drafting it and adopting it; there is no difference
between that adoption and this—such is the nature of corporate enactments—when the

4
corporate board (Congress) tells the secretary to enter the amendment as ratified (even
thought the States had not ratified it) the Secretary was instructed that the
Representatives word alone was sufficient for ratification. You must also note, this
amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national
Constitution, which already had its own 16th amendment. The Supreme Court (in
BRUSHABER v. UNION PACIFIC R. CO., 240 U.S. 1 (1916)) ruled the 16th
amendment did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and
clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations and
government employees. We agree, considering that they were created under the
authority of Corp. U.S.

7th: Next (also 1913) Corp. U.S., through Congress, adopts (as if ratified) its 17th
amendment. This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the nation's
Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are
elected, which is the subject matter of this amendment; therefore they cannot pass such
and Act and then of their own volition, order it entered as ratified. According to the
United States Supreme Court, for Congress to propose such an amendment they would
first have to pass an amendment that gave them the authority to discuss the matter.

8th: Accordingly, in 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for
reelection in 1913 by popular vote were seated in Corp. U.S. Senate capacity only; their
respective seats from their States remained vacant because neither the State Senates
nor the State Governors appointed new Senators to replace them as is still required by
the national Constitution for placement of a national Senator.

9th: In 1916, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College but their election is
required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where the new Corp. U.S.
only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation the
only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was
corporate only. Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second
term as President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S.
Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction government's seats were
vacated because the people didn't seat any original jurisdiction government
officers. It is important to note here that President Wilson retained his capacity as
Commander in Chief of the military. Many people wonder about this fact imagining that
such a capacity is bound to the President of the nation; however, When John Adams
was President he assigned George Washington to the capacity of Commander in Chief
of the military in preparation for an impending war with France. During this period, Mr.
Adams became quite concerned because Mr. Washington became quite ill and passed
on his acting military authority through his lead General Mr. Hamilton and Mr. Adams
was concerned that if war did break out Mr. Hamilton would use that authority to create a
military dictatorship of the nation. Mr. Adams averted the war through diplomacy and
the title of Commander in Chief was returned to him. (See: John Adams, by David
McCullough, this book covers Mr. Adams concerns over this matter quite well. Mr.
Adams was a fascinating man.)

10th: In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W. I and passes their Trading with the Enemies Act.

11th: In 1933, Corp. U.S. is bankrupt, they force a banking holiday to exchange money
backed Federal Reserve Notes with “legal tender” Federal Reserve Notes the Trading

5
with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States as
enemies of Corp. U.S.

12th: Some time after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a relationship
with their program. With the express purpose of generating Beneficiary funds to United
States General Trust Fund (GTF) the Social Security Administration creates an entity
with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and an
account number (Social Security number). They give you the Social Security card and
let you know that the card does not belong to you but you are to hold it for them until
they want it back. If you are willing to accept that responsibility over the card you
activate the card by signing it, which gives you the ability to act as the fiduciary for the
cards actual owner Corp. U.S. and you can use the card’s name and number to thus
transact business relations for the card’s actual owner. You are also to note that though
the card verifies its agency (you as the single person with authority to control the entity
so created) it is not for use as identification. On review: notice the Social Security
Administration was the creator of the entity, they offered you the opportunity to serve its
Trustee capacity (by lending it actual consciousness and physical capacity), they gave
you something (the card) that does not belong to you to hold in trust and they reserved
the actual owner of the thing (Corp. U.S.) as the beneficiary of the entity—by definition,
this only describes the creation and existence of a Trust. More importantly: the name
they gave this Trust is not your name, the number they gave the Trust is not your
number and your lending actual consciousness and physical capacity to this Trust’s
Trustee capacity does not limit you or your capacity to separately act in your natural
sovereign capacity in any way—what you do, when you do it and how you do it is still
totally up to you.

13th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to the
International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation.
[From Melvin and Susan: BAD MATH FELLAS! Make sure you’re sitting down for this
one. We turn now to United States Code (USC) Title 22 § 286 and read the following: "§
286. Acceptance of membership by the United States in International Monetary Fund.
"The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the
International Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to as the "Fund"), and in the
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (hereinafter referred to as the
"Bank"), provided for by the Articles of Agreement of the Fund and the Articles of
Agreement of the Bank as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations Monetary
and Financial Conference dated July 22, 1944, and deposited in the archives of the
Department of State. (July 31, 1945, ch 339, § 2, 59 Stat. 512.) Short titles: … May be
cited as the ‘Bretton Woods Agreements Act’. "Other provisions: Par value modification.
For the Congressional direction that the Secretary of the Treasury maintain the value in
terms of gold of the Inter-American Development Bank’s holdings of United States
dollars following the establishment of a par value of the dollar at $38 for a fine troy ounce
of gold pursuant to the Par Value Modification Act and for the authorization of the
appropriations necessary to provide such maintenance of value, see 31 USC §
449a."...The act further transfers the assets of the United States Treasury to the IMF
by stating words to the effect of: ‘the United States Treasury is now the Individual
Drawing account of the IMF’...Think about it. "The President is hereby authorized to
accept membership for the United States in the IMF" The President is authorized by
whom? Congress? Well, even if Congress did authorize it where did they get the
authority to so do? Certainly not from the Constitution, and Congress can’t
lawfully do anything the Constitution doesn’t authorize them to do...The

6
Constitution plainly states: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall
not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."... Ninth
amendment; and, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,
nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the
people." ...Tenth Amendment Further this joining in the IMF is obviously an international
agreement; and, any good dictionary will define, "an agreement between nations" as a,
"Treaty". The constitution is very specific on how treaties are to be engaged in with this
nation - First, the President signs the treaty; and Second, the Senate ratifies his
signature with a two-thirds majority vote...That didn’t happen here. So if the right wasn’t
given in the Constitution, Congress can’t take it and give it to the President... This act
states that Authorization came from the U.N. instead of from Congress, "provided for
… as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations": There was no treaty with the
U.N. until December 20, 1945, five months later, so the U.N. could not exercise its
treaty with Corp. U.S. If it did not add up then it never will; this is an example of
the corporation “deciding” the UN would exist as a legal entity so
PREDETERMINING we would enter a treaty with BEFORE that treaty thus that
legal entity ever existed. I exactly named “predetermined judicial fate” in my brief
as this is an example of the Executive and legislative attempting to circumvent WE
thus the federal court. It is a deliberate act meant to violate the separation of
powers thus give judicial power to those the founders said are most dangerous:
“The legislative department is everywhere extending the sphere of its activity, and
drawing all power into its impetuous vortex”, Madison, Federalist 48. The
corporation US makes it seem as if We, the People have a voice in the reasoning
and application of the law but the People do not as it is a done deal; that is, the
Corporation US was never NOT going to enter this treaty thus they knew to author
an act that presupposes it and that then is a denial of informed consent among
other things. It is forced on the People as WE had no opportunity to volunteer with
full consent. WE can never know if WE would have volunteered to conduct this
experiment had WE been informed. My true belief is: We would have volunteered
BUT as soon as there were no more benefits to be had the People would have
demanded that we fine tune the application and/or abandon this model altogether
based upon the People acting as soon as 1871 after first being incorporated in
1868; also the reason to release all officer’s of the Government from liability is no
more thus the Trust as it exists today has out lived its purpose. You can never go
back in time and make up that five month disparity as it is now history thus all you
can and may do? Change it in the now thus address Obama’s unconstitutional
election and do so supporting the bad math of this treaty with the bad math of
Bush V Gore as SCOTUS acted for wholly different reasoning than the designers
of the early trust and the later IMF, as SCOTUS did not act in any way for profit or
as it is being paid or will be paid in the future. To do this? You must then have a
volunteer – ME – who understands these complex legal issues and then can and
will ‘undo’ this Gordian Knot in consideration of ALL of the involved parties even
the private busniesses and so ‘unite’ the trust seats and the legal seats named in
our Constitution as one government, of the People, as our interest is a commonly
shared one in which the citizens do profit and some of this profit is in the form of
monetary reward but do so ethically and morally thus NO CONFLICT and WE all
‘win’. I knew Bush V Gore was the means to do this deliberately or intentionally for
even if they did not know at the time, SCOTUS lived out a law of this universe
found within our governing documents that is not written out exactly but as an
existing intrinsic concept; this law is also found within the Federalist Papers most
notably in Federalist 10 as “cause” and “effect” are named exactly but the other

7
element, the bigger or deeper element is not exactly named. This law of the US? It
is a universal law exactly as the Conservation of Energy and Matter is a law; it is
or it has existed since the creation of this universe. It is inviolate or inalienable.
An example of an attempt to violate what is in inviolate? If the officers of any Trust
act with deliberation to violate that Trust and/or our law in any way you do not
reward those unjust persons with more money and then leave those same unjust
persons in charge of the trust! See Wallstreet Collapse and failure of the SEC to
protect the People with no trustees removed. You are then setting up the trust and
the People to fail and to fail on purpose as essentially the officers of the trust have
now been ‘conditioned’ to believe that they can do what they want when they want
as if injury thus negative consequences do not accrue when that is not the case
as our law differentiates between actual and legal or nature versus man thus if
you need paper as proof? Look indirectly, at your bank statement or retirement
account NOT the paper the corrupted officers of the trust are directly generating
as they are not honest and so cannot be trusted. The effect is an internal one that
you cannot see with the naked eye as it changes who and what we are and so
annihilates self-awareness as well as national or liberty awareness; it annihilates
the concept known as ‘philadelphia’, acting as your brother’s keeper or extending
your orbit to include or protect as many others as possible with or under US law, a
part of which is liberty. It begins with one and spreads to many; it becomes
endemic; it is a terminal disease from which no other great government of the
past ever recovered thus we will be first to overcome our own wild success
exactly as a person may be made to overcome winning the lottery as every single
decision or action in life is fraught with positive and negative consequences
which is why we are to reason or be informed and then act upon that informed,
reasoned decision as WE act upon what WE truly believe]:

14th: In 1968, at the National Governor's Conference in Lexington, Kentucky, the IMF
leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were in for carrying out
their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in
the national and State constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protect
themselves the people would discover what had been done with their money and would
likely to kill them all and start over. They suggested the States form corporations like
Corp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could be
created, which would allow better and more powerful control over the people, which
thing the original jurisdiction governments of this nation had no capacity to do. Our
Constitutions secure that the governments do not govern the people rather they govern
themselves in accord with the limits of Law. The people govern themselves. Such is the
foundational nature of our Constitutional Republic.

15th: By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such private
corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the people ceased to
seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats. Now,
having stated these historical facts, we ask you not to believe us, but rather prove these
facts for yourself. We then ask you to contact us and share your discovery with us.
When you find there is no error in this historical outline, then remember these simple
facts and let no one dissuade you from the truth. The Bottom Line: when you speak
about these private foreign corporations remember that is what they are and stop
calling them government. Further, it is very important that we cease to attempt to fix
them [Susan: It’s ‘foreign’ if it is alien to our law or not a part of the fabric of our
original law as it is written in 1776 and 1787; ‘foreign’ does not necessarily mean

8
“of or from another physical nation not your own” but means it is unAmerican or
outside US law as authored by the Founders; it is not organic or inborn]. It is far
more important that we learn how to reseat our original jurisdiction government and
spread the word about the truth. By reseating our State and national governments in
their original jurisdiction nature, we gain the capacity to hold these private foreign
corporations accountable. They owe us a lot of money, in fact they owe us more money
than there is available in the world. In fact it is impossible for them to pay and that gives
us the leverage we need to take back our nation and put things right. The process is a
simple one. The difficulty is in getting our people to wake up to the truth. That's why we
ask you to prove the truth for yourself and contact us with your discovery. That means
that you must stop acting and communicating like you are anything other than the
sovereign that God created you to be. And, stop referring to Corp. U.S. or the STATE
OF 'X' as anything other than the private foreign corporations that they are. And, finally,
stop listening to the Patriot Mythology that is espoused by those that only give these
facts lip service.” – TeamLaw / Eric Marsden.

You do not seem able or capable to comprehend the law or the point of it nor its
application or if you do you hate me personally and uniquely: I EXACTLY NAMED
PRIVATE MONEY AND FOREIGN INTERESTS, “DAVID ROCKEFELLER” AS A
LONE PERSON AND AS A BODY OF BELIEF. I NEVER SWORE OUT ANY
ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN AUTHORITY OR CRIMINAL OR CORRUPTED
OR INCAPABLE AKA UNSAFE AUTHORITY, NOT TO YOU, ROBERTS,
CLINTON, BUSH OR OBAMA; I NOT ONCE EVER ACTED FOR ANY FOREIGN
BUSINESS INTERESTS AND INSTEAD FOUGHT A LOCAL WALMART AND
WON AS IT DOES UNCONSTITUTIONAL BUSINESS HERE AND ABROAD,
NAMELY IN CHINA; I NEVER WILLINGLY AND KNOWINGLY SUPPORTED
FOREIGNIZATION IN ANY WAY; I EVEN RAN TOLLS AS ROADS ARE
SOMETIMES LEASED TO FOREIGN NATIONS (EXACTLY AS FOREIGN
NATIONS ‘OWN’ SOME RED LIGHT CAMERA TECHNOLOGY) PLUS I WAS
TRAFFICKED ACROSS STATE LINES AND SO I DO NOT IN ANY WAY IF
AVOIDABLE SUPPORT MY INJURY. PERIOD. I DID NOT VOTE KNOWINGLY
AND WILLINGLY IN ANY ELECTION PRIOR TO 2000, AS I NEEDED BVG TO
TRANSPIRE THUS I THEN KNEW AND PUT IT ON THE RECORD IN 12/00 IN A
PHILADELPHIA COURT. BEFORE 2000 I COULD NOT NAME WHAT WAS
ENDEMICALLY BROKEN; I COULD NOT NAME “SPIRIT” or “LIBERTY NO
MORE” UNTIL I WAS ACTUALLY SOLD; THEN I NEEDED TO WITNESS THE
PEOPLE’S REACTION TO BVG AND WAR IN IRAQ TO KNOW. TODAY? I
WITNESS NORTH KOREA ACTING AS THE AUTHORITY OVER MY PERSON
AND THE US AGREEING AGAINST MY WILL AND IN SPITE OF MY CASE AND
IN SPITE OF EXACTLY WRITTEN US LAW AND US CASE LAW AS JUDGES ARE

9
NOW ACTIVELY COLLUDING OR CONSPIRING WITH THE CRIMINALS AND
WITH THE TERRORISTS AS NK IS. IF NK MAKES A DEMAND AS IT DID
REGARDING KIDNAPPED AMERICANS? AND THE US “SUBMITS” BUT DOES
SO WITH A PAST PRESIDENT LAW-ABIDING OR NOT? AND OBAMA LABELS
IT PRIVATE TO AVOID PENALTY UNDER THE LOGAN ACT AND/OR TREASON
CLAUSE? THE US IS NOW ACTING UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF NORTH
KOREA, KENYA or INDONESIA BUT NOT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE US,
OR, UNDER OUR LAW AKA THE WILL OF WE THE PEOPLE. FURTHER WHY
AM I YET DENIED JUSTICE WHEN THE EQUIVALENT CRIME, ‘DOMESTIC’
KIDNAPPING, WAS PERPETRATED UPON ME AND MY CHILDREN BUT NO
PERSON, NOT EVEN A TITLED ONE, ACTS FOR ME BUT ACTS FOR TWO
JOURNALISTS WHO KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND THE RISK THEY
WERE TAKING? TO RESCUE THEM FROM THEIR OWN BAD JUDGMENT AND
DO SO AT THE EXPENSE OF THIS NATION’S SOVEREIGNTY??? AS IF THEY
HAD A REASONABLE EXPECTATION US LAW DID PROTECT THEM WHEN
OBVIOUSLY IT IS NONEXISTENT FOR WOMEN IN GENERAL AND FOR ALL
AMERICANS WITHIN THE PHYSICAL BORDERS OF NORTH KOREA??? AND
THIS BENCH DOES NOT MAKE SO MUCH AS A PEEP??? I DID NOT AT ALL
CONTRIBUTE TO MY INJURY KNOWINGLY BUT THEY DID AND YET I GET NO
PROTECTION OF THE LAW AND THEY RECEIVE OVERLY BROAD
PROTECTION? Is it because they are Asian and I am white? Or is it as I am a
master reporter and they are amateurs? I INFORMED THE FEDERAL BENCH
AND THE SENATE; INSTEAD OF CHOOSING LAW AND SO WE THE PEOPLE IT
CHOSE MONEY, PRIVATE INTERESTS, PROFESSIONAL POLITICIANS, THE
CORRUPTED LEGAL PROFESSION AND OTHER CRIMINALS AS WELL AS
TERRORISTS. IN 2008 I COULD HAVE FOUGHT AND WON THE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTION DENYING ME MY LEGAL VOTE BUT
REALIZED TO DO SO WOULD BE TO COOPERATE THUS THEN HAVE
UNCLEAN HANDS SO INSTEAD I ACCESSED SCOTUS TO SECURE MY LEGAL
STANDING THUS MY VOTE OR POWER AND AUTHORITY OVER MY OWN
DESTINY AND FATE. On or around 12/22/06 when first reporting all I knew about
NY’s corrupted court system to the FBI as well as the federal corporation’s involvement
to seat a President who would be a foreigner to then protect private and foreign
investments illegally made here and abroad at my expense thus I named HAWAII exactly
as I knew it then would lead to a SCOTUS case of original jurisdiction? I NOT ONLY
INVOKED MY RIGHTS AS A NATURAL BORN SOVEREIGN CITIZEN, A NATION

10
UNTO MYSELF, BUT AS A SOVEREIGN CITIZEN OR RESIDENT OF FLORIDA
BUT NAMED MY BIRTH IN NY AS NY RATIFIED OUR CONSTITUTION AND AS
MOST OF FLORIDA IS NOT A LEGAL POSSESSION OF THE US BUT FELL TO US
VIA CONTRACT DISPUTES BETWEEN SPAIN & FRANCE AND AS SPAIN
RELINQUISHED ITS FL TERRITORY VIA DEFAULT AS IT OPENLY VIOLATED
AND ACTIVELY OR KNOWINGLY DEFAULTED ON A 400 YEAR OLD
CONTRACT IT HAS WITH THE NATIVES WHICH WE INHERITED BUT DID NOT
KNOW OF THAT I THEN FOUND AND ENTERED TO SCOTUS AND THAT
ROBERTS THEN READ AND ACTED UPON. O.J. AND LAND PATENTS ARE
BASED UPON DERIVATION FROM A LEGAL TREATY THE US ENTERED WITH
A FOREIGN OR OUTSIDE POWER NOT AN ILLEGAL, NEVER VALID TREATY!
Think of it as pedigree or provenance. Ask yourself: Where did that first man come from?
What nationality is he? What is the very first treaty man had with a power outside of
himself? Is it possible with modern science to trace all races ‘back’ to EDEN or ADAM
AND EVE VERSUS THEIR CREATOR? Yes, it is! If the right is inalienable, if
‘inalienable’ is a law, then you can prove it as hardcore fact thus prove the law. I out
reasoned Corporate US and the federal bench’s denial of reality by entering TWO
treaties, EDEN See O.T. (Common X, physical birth of the form in Africa plus the region
known as the Middle East/Asia border that is when and where man first came to reason
on his own as we have scientifically proven as every treaty or contract after this was
based upon Eden including the Iroquois Confederacy and Magna Carta as the salvation
history of Earth constitutes our legal history) and THE TREATY KNOWN AS “SPAIN’S
2ND EXPEDITION AND ONLY SURVIVING NOTES”, A TREATY THAT IS LEGAL,
VALID & BINDING AS THE US CANNOT MAKE GOOD ON A TREATY IT
INHERITS FROM SPAIN VIA THE LA PURCHASE IF SPAIN HAS IT SITTING ON
A SHELF IN STORAGE UNKNOWN AND UNTRANSLATED. AS SOON AS IT WAS
MADE PUBLIC? I READ IT AND REALIZED: AN EXACT CONTRACT OR TREATY
SITS WITHIN THESE NOTES! I CAN LEGALLY ARGUE THE SOVEREIGNTY OF
WE THE PEOPLE BACK TO THIS TREATY AND THEN ACROSS THE GLOBE TO
OUR COMMONLY SHARED X DNA OR PROVE AUTHORITY IS INALIENABLE
AKA BORN OF THE EXACTLY NAMED CREATOR. I’M NO SLOUCH WHEN IT
COMES TO MATTERS CONCERNING MY VERY LIFE AND DEATH THAT YOU
CAN NEVER, EVER REMOVE FROM THE PEOPLE OR ITS GOVERNING
DOCUMENTS. NY & FL (AND PA) ARE STATES, SOVEREIGN STATES WITHIN A
SOVEREIGN NATION. I ENTERED THEIR STATE CONSTITUTIONS TO THE
FEDERAL COURT, IN THEIR ENTIRETY. LAST TIME I FACT CHECKED?

11
WASHINGTON DC IS NOT A STATE BUT IS THE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
OR SEAT OF THE CORPORATION NOT THE SEAT OF THE LEGAL
GOVERNMENT (THAT LEGAL, ORIGINAL SEAT WOULD BE WHEREVER I AM
AS I LEGALLY SIT IN SCOTUS NOW HAVING ENTERED DIRECTLY UPON AN
CLAIM OF O.J. THUS NEPTUNE BEACH, FL IS NOW THE SEAT OF ACTUAL,
ORIGINAL POWER AND AUTHORITY AKA US SOVEREIGNTY AS EXACTLY
NAMED WITHIN OUR CONSTITUTION AND MARBURY ) AND I WENT SO FAR
AS TO EXACTLY NAME THAT HONOR BOUND AGREEMENT BETWEEN
WASHINGTON, HAMILTON AND JEFFERSON THAT CREATED DC AS THEY
NEVER INTENDED FOR US, WE THE PEOPLE, TO BECOME A PRIVATE AND
FOREIGN CONTROLLED COMMODITY NOR A PUBLICLY TRADED ONE. THEY
DID NOT SELL US INTO SLAVERY AND/OR HUMAN BONDAGE BUT
LIBERATED US. DC RATIFIED NOTHING IN OUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS!
DC IS A NECESSARY ‘CORRUPTION’, A LEGAL ENTITY WE NEEDED AFTER
THE FACT TO THEN AVOID CONFLICT: VOTING RIGHTS OF CITIZENS IN
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA “ differ from those of United States citizens in each
of the 50 states. D.C. residents do not have voting representation in the United States
Senate and only a delegate in the House of Representatives, but D.C. is entitled to three
electoral votes for President.The United States Constitution grants congressional voting
representation to the states, which the District is not. The District is a federal territory
ultimately under the complete authority of Congress.” A CONFLICT. BUT: A
CONFLICT WASHINGTON, HAMILTON AND JEFFERSON NEVER, EVER
INTENDED FOR US AS DC BECAME A DIVIDED INTEREST BETWEEN CORP. US
VERSUS WE THE PEOPLE. [A corruption of US law is not necessarily itself corrupt
because of the due process clauses and our living nature or it, DC, is as it acts.] I
NAMED ALL OF THIS EXACTLY, SETTING UP THE FRAME WORK FOR MY
EVENTUAL SCOTUS WIN, A LEGAL VICTORY THAT IS ALREADY. IF IT WERE
NOT FOR SCOTUS, MARBURY AND IN RE SUSAN? DC WOULD BE A DEN OF
ACTUAL INEQUITY AS PROVEN BY ALL OF DC THE CORPORATE SEAT AND
ITS EFFECT ON WE THE PEOPLE LIKE AN ILLEGAL WAR, ENDEMIC LETHAL
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND THE ACTUAL SELLING OF OUR PERSONS
AND OUR CHILDREN TO PRIVATE AND FOREIGN INTERESTS UNTIL
FEDERAL JUDGES ARE OPENLY ACTING TO OVERTHROW THE
DECLARATION AND CONSTITUTION OR ACTUALLY MURDERING INNOCENT
AMERICANS VIA AWARDING THEM TO THE UNETHICAL AND UNJUST,
THOSE WHOSE ‘POWER’ IS ENTRENCHED AND HAS NO CONSTITUTIONAL

12
OR RATIONAL BASIS AS IT IS ALL ABOUT PERCEPTION AND IS NOT THE
ACTUAL REALITY OF WHAT THE DECLARATION, CONSTITUTION OR PRIOR
SCOTUS RULINGS – US CASE LAW - CLEARLY AND EXACTLY STATE. US
CASE LAW? IF YOU HAD ANY ON YOUR SIDE YOU’D CITE IT AND NOT RULE
42-4. Actual law as written in 1776 and 1787 and US case law? Put up or shut up as in
cease and desist writing words you can never support in any actual, legal court of law like
SCOTUS and that only serve to prove your own guilt as your words – your work – self-
evince or prove you to be repugnant thus your [this] order is void: “the Constitution's
written nature, and the formal enumeration of the powers of government would be empty
promises if there were no means to measure the actions of the government against the
Constitution, and strike down those found wanting (see Marbury, supra, at 177)
"[c]ertainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming
the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every
such government must be, that an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is
void’”. As the Act is void then you are null and void. You and your work is repugnant. It
is my protected and exactly worded right to abolish and dissolve you and your work, the
insufferable and unjust form. So then: TeamLaw (and Melvin) is correct regarding the
above facts one of which is the five month disparity between the signing of the Treaty
and the Act itself as you cannot ENACT what does not yet exist! Personally opine all you
wish; you can never reason that disparity away. If there is no legally recognized UN then
there is no act naming the UN as it is not a legal entity or legal authority yet thus we
cannot enact and engage in what is not and sign the Treaty ex post facto. It constitutes
actual ex post facto law or pre facto law, anticipatory but which might never come to be
real law, a done deal w/o any representation, but however you choose to count it the math
as well as the reasoning and application is bad, very bad. If you wholly disregard the 5
month disparity the UN still is not legal as the US has refused to sign its human rights
charter, a treaty, and the only reason for that? Past administrations some of who are unjust
persons within those administrations have openly stated it is because of WOMEN AS
THE EQUALS OF MEN clauses thus the US will not sign that Charter or Treaty and so
does not practice its own exactly written law! “Authorities” then admit or openly confess
the US as a living Government of People exists in theory only not in practice! They are
claiming that a living government is not our law! The ‘authorities’ admit they act upon
and for the Corporation US but not upon and for WE, the People. And it’s reasoning?
Fatally flawed as equal protection is a law of this universe thus these MEN as the
corporate authority, the Office of the Executive, is exclusively male and unjustly so is
openly and actively injuring me only for woman and w/o any legal named reasoning or

13
cause as the one it names is wholly manufactured as it is not about sovereignty of the US
but is about men controlling women and children, or, buying and selling their persons.
The only legal and logical conclusion based upon the actual facts or actual reality, as it is
now not as you personally want it to be to then avoid this case, US law, exact words and
good or correct math as well as science and US case law is: I’m the acting, legal
President and Commander of original jurisdiction and upon my appearance in
person in SCOTUS I then make John Roberts the acting, legal Chief Justice of
original jurisidction as well as the currently sitting Justices legal as SCOTUS is the
lone institution besides myself that has not been corrupted or has been consistently
self-correcting aka self-adjudicating thus is still in line, LAWFUL, or exists as
intended as written by its creators: The Original Founders including Marshall (all
of them) and our Creator aka what came before the Declaration and Constitution.
See “A Summary View On The Rights Of British America” by Jefferson. Ideally you want
to unseat the crooks like the judges on this very bench as they came to exist now (but not
necessarily as they were born or as they were when first they sat) and then reseat them
with ethical and moral persons. Or you need all currently sitting officers to be
accountable and responsible and then act to fulfill their duties under our law in both letter
and spirit and this must then begin at the top, Executive, and then at the bottom, lone
citizen or voter. You do not want two governments; you do not want a shadow one that is
not what was intended or one split in two with divided interests and you do not want
foreigners or crooks running this nation and killing We the People spiritually and/or
physically. You want to export US law as it is elegant not import socialism, Marxism,
fascism, materialism, militarism, communism, despotism, dictatorship or religious
extremism. You also do not want to institute STUPID, AFRAID and UNWILLING as
qualifications to qualify as President or to qualify as voter. I unincorporated us by
dissolving all kinds of personal, mistaken and at times false belief and the ‘inserted’ or
entrenched corruption of the law thus liability does indeed ensue as you knew as I told
you. Some of it was legal at the time, it seemed to be then and did work then but now it
does not, and some of it never was legal and so is not now legal. Legally you never were
incorporated and me? I never agreed. Then whatever that thing was that you referred to as
a just government? Even you, the US in the form of the Solicitor General, defaulted on
11/05/08 after I informed it of the fact and law plus the correct application of US law to
all persons across the board. Even you, the corporate US, could not stand that ugly,
clumsy thing you only called a government of the People when it is not. Is a federal
judiciary beholden to Corporate US, deriving its power from the Corporation and not the
People, even remotely constitutional? No and even Hamilton would balk at that idea.

14
Hamilton’s idea is that money can often buy the requisite education or can accord you
necessary life experience poverty might not as people who overcome gross adversity via
extraordinary effort are few and far between. Hamilton never intended for a strong
federal Corporation at the very extinction of the People! He intended to create a
centralized government of People not a corporate trust or a privately funded trust;
Hamilton as a private citizen and as an officer? One and the same thus there is no
conflict. Hamilton, Adams and Marshall never once named this thing we are today. What
is my proof? LIFE: I can read Marbury and in Marshall’s own hand plus when this idea
first came close to being realized? Hamilton voted for Jefferson to defeat Burr legally and
then placed himself between Burr and the People thus took an actual bullet for us to
defeat Burr physically. Upon reading what original jurisdiction actually is and means you
must reverse or overturn your own ruling or when I do eventually win - physically win as
legally it has happened or is done – either in a court or in real life as the People finally
suffer so much they are moved to support my Presidency and with violence if your
unconstitutional actions make that necessary? You set yourself up for death as you incited
that violence and as the Fifth Amendment says WE do not need to convene a grand jury
in this case to then charge, try and convict you thus hang you. You were to command, no?
YES, AND IN TIME OF ACTUAL WAR. I am a keen observer and I have keenly and
wisely observed you named no actual, legal reason for abandoning your command.
NOTHING AT ALL. You said it is DISMISSED and MOOT but not WHY. You did
exactly quote Rule not law or case law “42-4”, a rule not written by a Founder and in a
spirit SCOTUS has in the past thrown out as a form of discrimination and that I named as
a form of evidence tampering as it is a deliberate manipulation or manufacturing of the
evidence JOHN ROBERTS and so SCOTUS will eventually see, hear, feel and weigh,
citing the governing documents are "ENTIRELY WITHOUT MERIT" meaning you
looked right at the SCOTUS docket, American history books and even the UN in NYC -
all of which is a product of the two US governing documents so they must have some
merit - but then DENIED and DISMISSED it all or CONFESSED TO YOUR GUILT IN
WRITING! You are saying that WE, the people aka the Constitution is entirely without
merit and that my birth is without merit for if the Revolution was never fought and I was
never born in America naturally? I never would have entered SCOTUS, the US never
would have defaulted on 11/05/08 and Roberts never would have acted on 11/20/08. Are
you serious? Do you truly believe WE are this silly or that we would ever come to believe
the Revolution was not fought? Or that Obama/Biden is legal? I told you within my brief:
"You can make an attempt to defeat the math, US law and history - the universe - but
guess what? Only the mentally ill or insane do that." I take it then your plea is insanity?

15
As you are claiming Roberts himself and his action is w/o merit? That he too is ‘crazy’
and cannot read? That like you some disembodied being put a pen in his hand and a
gun to his head and forced him to write "DENIED" any and all protection of the law?
You made a mistake: Roberts never said any such thing. The appearance of the paper
and computer generated docket only makes it seem as if. He's not mentally ill and can and
does reason. You, unlike he, wrote "MOOT". Exactly. YES, I AGREE AS WE ALL DO:
THE DECLARATION AND CONSTITUTION IS NOW MOOT AS OFFICERS LIKE
YOU RENDER IT MOOT VIA YOUR ACTIONS THUS I WIN AGAIN AS YOU
CONCURRED! YOU’RE MY PROOF OF DEATH. You, an other federal court do not
have John Roberts reason; you are not acting as John Marshall as he is. You do have
another choice that is now available as Roberts and I provided it; we created the
opportunity for you. My true belief is: This court means to place the burden of petitioning
SCOTUS on me and is confident it can escape liability by claiming it acted and only
failing to act is a crime. Not in this instance.

2. I have a volunteer. It was not humanly possible for him to act before he read my brief as
SCOTUS denied him informed consent thus now he can and may. Upon re-entry to
SCOTUS? He or any willing volunteer then joins my case thus appearing in the caption.
That makes him Vice President. He's a voter acting in his official capacity as a voter as well
as an individual. If he chooses not to continue? Next person to get to me and volunteer
wins IF they name their case and so every element. Upon our win he then gets his name on
the ballot for President in 2012 as a candidate independent from me or in his own
right. This then makes us a brand new case of original jurisdiction. I have reasoned I can
enter several ways to make it ORIGINAL as I ruled all citizens were ignorant not guilty
like you are as you are an expert lawyer now exploiting your knowledge a part of which is
life experience thus abusing your power. The ignorant now not so ignorant are to get one
opportunity. Thus, you want to reconsider if you exist as a judge and as a living, breathing
human being let alone an American as SCOTUS is waiting for me as our the People. You?
You are not a foreigner thus you cannot escape the death penalty by claiming you are not
bound by the Constitution. You are or else you would not have acted to cash a money order
that read TRIBUTE across it and you would not have then written DENIED and MOOT.
You produced several pieces of paper claiming that you are bound by the Declaration and
Constitution. I not only want a refund but the voters and I want a refund with interest: you
gone as that is in our best interest. And someone has volunteered to help me make that
happen sooner rather than later. For good measure I secured one other volunteer: A man
who cannot read so could not know of the SCOTUS action or the reasons why BVG and

16
Obama are illegal and in violation of the law. He is not to blame for his injury as it was
beyond his control until now. Until me, Susan.

3. You may not issue an ORDER that applies to me uniquely as a 20 page limit does based
upon my unique facts which you yourself read thus own or issue an order that instructs a
clerk to commit what is a violation of the Constitution and is a criminal act known as
treason. You knew as hardcore fact that such an order is not constitutional but went and did
it anyway. I exactly named this exact action with exact words thus you read my motion and
my brief as well as Marbury so owned this knowledge, that it is unconstitutional and a
violation of my fully vested, protected rights as well as an overturning of past federal
precedent set by SCOTUS aka US case law, but then acted to do it. This is not so complex;
it is basic reasoning you learn as a child not in law school. Science says that you own a
conscience at about age 4; my own life proves this is a fact as at age 4 I owned the
knowledge of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’. But if you were not raised to know? Law school and
then life taught you, as you are a FEDERAL judge not a state judge. You would not exist if
not for the federal interpretation and concept of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ known as Marbury, as
if not for Marbury? No constitutional authority as an institution. No redress. Marbury then
led to all of it, and to USC 1331. Marbury birthed you, as you exist today. Marbury is
you, applies to you and makes it possible for the people to then empower you. You
cannot be separated from Marbury. Marbury V Madison clearly states all people are
each accountable and responsible thus if that order is obeyed in open and direct violation of
the letter of the law or its spirit or both and which in violation of Marbury? The clerk is the
liable in addition to you as they are to defy such an order as it itself by its nature is
unconstitutional or is intrinsically, fatally flawed. I clearly stated that this court would not
know liberty as it could not as it was not willing to preserve, protect and defend our law in
my unique case, in the cases of women and in the cases of all ethical or law abiding
Americans, a part of which its spirit aka liberty. This sham of a decision, ruling and order is
evidence rising to proof and the person or people who wrote it? Absolute proof, proof
itself, of all I claimed. No living people acting legally or illegally? No action or no proof.
Dead bodies do not produce cognizant work, paper or otherwise. Are you the judges of this
bench denying your own miserable existence as a corporate entity? Oh that’s right! Life
ain’t so hard for you is it? As you have all of the overly broad power, as you have all of the
tribute and as you have all of the physical comforts you could ask for including a lifetime
appointment and never-ending paycheck as a direct result of tribute. Your children were not
kidnapped and you were not tortured; you just came to participate willingly. KNOWINGLY
is now the federal question. Did these judges know or not? No sane, rational person can

17
answer ‘no’, as this bench had to ignore all of reality to then deny me standing upon any
claim whatsoever. Left to reason this myself? I have only one answer: These judges catered
to everything and everyone except to WE, the people and US law. I am left with only one
answer, an answer that the People named over and over: These judges are afraid of David
Rockefeller, Barack Obama and their ilk – the wealthy and currently entrenched persons
acting criminally. They fear the imbalance of power so much so they refuse to confront the
legal issue: DISCRIMINATION OF WOMEN NOW BEING REALIZED AS
DISCRIMINATION OF THE ETHICAL AND/OR VERY INTELLIGENT. “Entirely
without merit” constitutes a lie, perjury, in this case.

5. The only reason I'm motioning for you to reconsider your reasoning, decision and ruling
or your application of lawlessness and rule but not anything actually written by The
Founders? To reconsider your traitorous idea - the Declaration and Constitution is
DISMISSED and MOOT and so does not apply to you - that harms you firstly and mostly
and which you acted upon? So the process is finally exhausted thus when WE do put you to
death? You cannot cry you did not know or that WE did not inform you. WE did inform
you and you then gave us your informed consent to put you to death for treason. You wrote
it down and signed it. Your true belief is, or so I allege, based upon the proof known as
your work as your work is you as this is constitutional law: "This citizens are stupid, weak,
lazy slobs who hate women especially bitches like Susan thus I can so I will; I’m safe from
any negative consequences." You'd be wrong as the Creator will take care of you if you
drop dead before we get to you and having to choose between me and you WHO do you
think the People will choose? As life is proof? FOUR TIMES I DID ALL I COULD TO
GET ARRESTED AND FOUR TIMES I WAS NOT. So far the Secret Service, FBI, local
police and US Marshal has chosen their own lives over yours. They have not chosen me but
they have not chosen you either. They were waiting to see your ruling and order. I told you:
The Navy wished me luck when I STOOD IT DOWN; THE NAVY SAID IF ANYONE
CAN WE KNOW YOU, SUSAN, WILL. The Navy’s job is NOT to make it easy. Ideally they
aren’t to go out of their way to harm me but hey, I reason the Navy acts in direct proportion
to the actual, legal threat that I am to the old and now failed model. I quoted US law and
case law and they told me WE ARE NOT AWARE A COUP HAS OCCURRED. I fact
checked the Navy: did it know of Brown II? Yes. Did it know what this, reality of BVG and
Election 08, then constituted? No. Congressional Res. 511 did not exist then. I said,
knowing the paper trail is well hidden and even nonexistent, I believe you as you might not
be able to know. I’ll prove it by standing down the offices of Chief Justice and President.
The Navy said, Good luck and if it is possible WE know you will. I told officer Bob M. of

18
JAG: And when I do? Your name, Bob M., is at the top of my very, very short list. YOU not
the Navy. I never spoke to THE Navy, the top person according to chain of command
theory. I wrote to him in the form of an emergency application and petition in support of it
as he is JOHN ROBERTS and he acted for me.

6. What do you know? I did not need 20 pages but I took them. Actually I only needed one
sentence: On 03/22/08 the Solicitor General of the US waived your interest (the interest of
the judges and clerks reading this) and waived your right to vote, act as a judge, express
your opinion on anything or to collect a salary and all of your rights (the rights of the
judges and clerks reading this). Legally, you have no interest and no right as you made no
objection and on August 3rd, 2009, upheld that waiver. SCOTUS served you twice, 07-9804 &
08-6622, and twice you failed to answer or to object in any way. You never had power and
authority over me and still do not. When offered it over yourself? You failed to claim it. You,
BLACK, CARNES, and MARCUS did not object and just upheld the waiver of your interest
and right. You even said the law or reality - it's inalienable - is MOOT. In your case YES but
in mine? NO. Unlike you I vested my interest and my right by entering SCOTUS directly and
then coming back here as I never entered this court before and as I, the case, never left
SCOTUS only the paper with my name printed on it did. Jurisdiction and issue did not
magically change as our law did not nor did I quit and/or fail. The law is any actual power and
authority you might come to have in this world? YOU GET IT FROM ME OR WE THE
PEOPLE NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND! You do not give me anything. This actual
power and actual authority? It is born of the exactly named Creator thus is inalienable. You
can and may give it away but not take it from me: You gave your power and authority away to
me, SCOTUS and the People.

7. I not once ever wanted to become President. I had higher aspirations: Supreme Court
Justice. I was like a laser beam solely focused on that one institution and how to get in on my
own, as I knew there was a door no person could see. Jesus told me he broke in for me. Jesus
told me that he set a place for me. The Founders repeated this to me over and over. They fully
admitted: The only proof we have is our own existence as an independent nation. You might
fail us. Susan, you of all people cannot fail us! They did not say this exactly they said it with
symbols or clues as they enshrined the truth of who and what they are as people all over the
place – in letters, books, rulings, currency, maps, portraits, schools, flags, architecture, words
etc. etc. You see a red, white and blue flag while I see, hear and feel “Abraham” and the

19
promise God made that came true for him, then Washington and now me. You see a leaky
ceiling where I see actual stars: Polaris and Orion. You see a building and a filing system
while I see a living institution, the Library of Congress, with a plaque that makes me laugh:
“Jefferson” as he created it with his own books, books that now bear a Library of Congress
‘code’ number. You see actual money where I see Hamilton’s face but I think SAFETY and
feel, ‘This new multicolored junk looks like it came out of a monopoly game; it may as well
have for it’s worthless’. Your reality is false; it is not my own as I learned to see past the
physical world as the physical is all an illusion; physical things symbolize the truth. Physicists
who are doing nothing more than searching for God told me exactly to check the pulse rate of
the respiring universe. So I knew – you are ‘crazy’ as you are looking at THINGS and not
considering the PEOPLE, or, HUMAN HEARTS. The truth of the Founders is their mind and
human heart, still living. You can and do hear it and feel it if you listen. It’s the emotional
result of their grand experiment that I knew to look for as you cannot see emotion but liberty
and safety are emotions and are rights. They made us safe. You made me unsafe. I changed my
awareness of the pulse rate of the respiring nation aka the People...I began to follow the First
We The People or the Delaware Indians as their actual name means “We, the People” and then
Jesus accidentally by design by following John Adams as I cannot hear, see or feel what I am
way too close to, a body of belief known as “Thomas Jefferson”. I know they lock the door at
night. I know the building is guarded. I know lawyers are hogging all the seats. That’s your
reality, a fantasy in your head based upon past events and past failure to act not what is now as
I acted as did Roberts. My reality? Lawyers acting as if they are hogs is against the spirit of
the law. That was then this is now. I’m already in! No lock, guard or lawyer can or may keep
me out as long as I act in my own defense and always have an answer for Roberts. Later I
began defending The Founders as the name “Patriot Act” constitutes defamation of character
as proven by those aforementioned “Bush” memos. Are these guys nuts to act upon the belief
that they can keep me, the product or culmination of all who came before me, out? That you
can fine tune history to then pervert the law thus overthrow the People? Wakey, wakey! The
Founders built it into the design: our law is designed to include you as when The Founders
open a door and all 13 original states ratify it no modern federal judge or corporation can close
it. If the door is not there? The tool to make the door is. And if that door is created, opened and
so there it is w/o any lock but you do not know how to walk through it? Or people keep
stopping you from entering? You have written and unwritten instructions! Copy a play out of
the Founders book, which is their lives or if you prefer the Federalist Papers: Act, act as if you
belong there and people will believe you do...or actually disguise yourself with math in the
form of words not numbers and vice versa. By the time they recognize the truth of your
argument in light of the facts and US law? It’s too late - you’re in! Or: Say you know how

20
and then act, take that step, faking it all the way if you have to as life will eventually prove
you wrong or right and the only real master you ever have is experience. Addicts call this
faking it until you are making it – making US law and history that is! Fortunately for me I
was born a legal prodigy. This nation does not recognize legal prodigies, as those in charge
truly believe you cannot know something if an anointed authority keeps the knowledge from
you. You do not understand “reasoning” is inborn and acquired. You, a lawyer, truly believe
you have to learn the law in a law school or it is impossible as it is an ultra-exclusive, closed
club. Do musical prodigies need music lessons? No! I, like a genius musician, am born with
this skill, a human quality and a human ability. How did that first black or Native lawyer, a
SCOTUS case, come to be? They did it on their own, that’s how. You victimized them until
they knew to then act in the opposite direction, as an opposing force against you, thus
overcoming the made up barriers which exist in your mind and within your heart but not
within US law. The other reason this nation lost out on me the prodigy and still does not
recognize me as a genius? Stendhal told me: ALL WOMEN BORN GENIUSES ARE LOST
TO THE PUBLIC GOOD. How is this good for the public??? It defies reason and our law,
if not the sitting officers, is reasonable as reason is the very nature of its design. You
know what else is? Intention, as all of this is intentional. The Founders meant for me to
happen!

Conclusion

Motion to reconsider granted so Susan's ruling is upheld: BLACK, CARNES and

MARCUS are MOOT as they are guilty of treason. The death penalty may now be
carried out IF and only IF they do not revoke the waiver of their rights by hearing this
case in person or issuing an order AGAINST Obama, Roberts and the US not against
reason thus a against our Constitution. NO OTHER CHOICES ARE
CONSTITUTIONAL OR EVEN REMOTELY REASONABLE OR RATIONAL AND A
FAILURE TO CHOOSE ONE OF THESE IS THEN TREASON IN THIS CASE. AN
ORDER CITING RULE AND THE WORDS “DISMISSED” “MOOT” AND
“ENTIRELY WITHOUT MERIT” CONSTITUTES A CRIMINAL ACT. It rises to
treason as this bench now knows the facts of US history and the UN/IMF thus knows its
own seats are only made legal or become constitutional upon hearing this case in person
or issuing a ruling against Obama; it must read “Obama” “defendant” and
“unconstitutional” in a fashion that unequivocally states Obama, his facts and his actions,
is repugnant thus void thus so is his election. It might read “Roberts” it might not as like
a bead sliding across an abacus this court can address Roberts injury as his rights have

21
been violated and he was the victim of a crime as he was used to make an attempt to
corrupt the Supreme Court w/o any person ever knowing but that attempt failed as he
acted against it, not me, when informed by naming him as a pro se plaintiff not a
defendant thus ruling WITH HIM AND FOR WE THE PEOPLE. In this manner this
bench rules itself to be NOT GUILTY OF TREASON BUT ONLY ACCOUNTABLE
FOR ANY RESULTING PERSONAL INJURY. A federal judge is to know: The case
becomes Herbert and or with Roberts or all pro se litigants, against Obama and the US,
those who are not pro se, as all citizens failed us when they failed to reason their vote and
Obama/Biden has a lawyer, Bob Bauer. He and his firms interests conflict with the
People’s.

By their very design federal judges are to be intentionally constitutional and of good
behavior. Is your defense that you never, ever read the Federalist Papers not even when I
printed them out for you? Federalist 78, Hamilton: “To avoid an arbitrary discretion in
the courts, it is indispensable that they should be bound down by strict rules and
precedents, which serve to define and point out their duty in every particular case
that comes before them; and it will readily be conceived from the variety of
controversies which grow out of the folly and wickedness of mankind, that the
records of those precedents must unavoidably swell to a very considerable bulk, and
must demand long and laborious study to acquire a competent knowledge of them.
Hence it is, that there can be but few men in the society who will have sufficient skill
in the laws to qualify them for the stations of judges. And making the proper
deductions for the ordinary depravity of human nature, the number must be still
smaller of those who unite the requisite integrity with the requisite
knowledge...Upon the whole, there can be no room to doubt that the convention
acted wisely in copying from the models of those constitutions which have
established good behavior as the tenure of their judicial offices...”

I will let the citizens know the outcome or consequences of BLACK, CARNES and
MARCUS’ own bad ideas and acts that thankfully are not our law. BLACK, CARNES
and MARCUS do not constitute US law at work but their own whim and will or their
prejudices and fears at work. This ruling in the form of a motion to reconsider constitutes
an arrest warrant upon a charge of treason as well as other, lesser acts of sedition and
subversion. It remains an arrest warrant until or unless it becomes a new decision, ruling
and order that is based upon our law and is made in consideration of all of the facts.

22
I, Susan Herbert, have attached what the sitting judges could not know, as I did not tell
them as it was not possible or as I truly believed they already knew it. I mailed Roberts
this same fact. All a sitting federal judge has to do is admit they did not know something
and make another decision. This is the most difficult thing of all to do as it is deemed to
be an admission of stupidity, fault or defect. Incorrect as in order for this to have
happened? Lawyers had to lie to the faces of these exact judges several times over and
with deliberation; they had to bring defective arguments before this exact bench when
they knew different. Then, all 300 million citizens had to act upon criminal ideas. Until or
unless a lawyer became willing to say whatever it took to then rip these exact judges out
of their exact seats – a comfort zone - as they have a unique perspective re Schiavo, an
argument in which a LAWYER heard a man say “I need justice so I want to kill an
innocent woman” and then turned it into a federal case for pay but not a criminal one thus
we know it is the LAWYER not the husband so the judges then could see themselves and
see the problem – PROTECTION OF THE LAW and LAWYERS corrupting it to their
personal advantage with deliberation – these judges had a blind spot they could not
overcome. Roberts and I undid that blindfold thus I, if I sat as a judge, would eagerly
accept the opportunity before me: We, the People need a patron saint; why not you?

ENTERED AND ORDERED AUGUST 5th, 2009.

Susan Herbert,
The acting, legal President and Commander in Chief as I am, as my will, my reasoning,
my one vote, the equal protection and due process clauses and Marbury make it so

23