Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
IDBE 12
By
Li HongYu
IDBE 12
University of Cambridge
August 2006
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
Table of Contents
1.0 2.0 Introduction Leadership 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.0 Definition of Leadership Leadership versus Management Qualities and Traits of a Leader
Leadership in Delivering A Project 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Leadership in Team Building Leadership in Project Process Impetus for Changes Cultivating Leadership A Perception in Todays Organisations - Architectural or Engineering Consulting Firms
4.0
Bibliography
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
1.0
Introduction
It is common practice today that a project manager is assigned with the authority and responsibility to manage a project in a constraining and ferociously competitive environment. The project manager shall therefore undertake the functions of organisation, planning, staffing, directing and controlling the project to enable the management of the budget and work plan and all project management procedures including scope management, issues management, risk management, and so on, to achieve the objectives of the project within the requisite time frame and budget. A project manager is often by default regarded as a project leader, playing a significant role in not merely managing but also leading the project team to achieve the objectives of the project. Nevertheless, can a project manager naturally be a leader? Are there distinctions between leadership and management? Research studies on leadership and management indicate that they are essentially different entities although there are many overlaps between them. What should a manager do and what should a leader do in a project environment? How can a good harmony be attained to balance leadership and management in order to deliver the success of a project which is, in the end, peoples accomplishment? To answer these questions it is necessary to turn to fundamental principles underpinning the definition of leadership, character traits and innate capabilities of a leader, relationship of project leadership and management implemented in the life cycle of a project. This essay focuses on seeking out answers for the above questions and finding an insight and essence of project leadership as well as the relationship of a leader and his team, the followers, in the cycle of a project work, the indispensable elements leading to the success of a project.
2.0
Leadership
The old image of a dictating boss with a non-negotiable goal of a project whipping and rounding up his team and charging off to the destination is hardly consistent with modern management thinking. The concept of the management of an organization or enterprise has steadily evolved over the last few decades. The different decades, according to Dilenschneider [1], may be characterized as shown in Table 1.
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
It can be seen from the above table that there had been a progression from administrative command to team leadership, a change driven by an enlightened work force and a need to be ferociously competitive. Leaders create and need followers. Therefore they need to understand people, his or her followers. Douglas McGregor [2] has examined theories on behaviour of individuals at work based on social science research, and he has formulated two models which he calls Theory X and Theory Y. Theory X is the assumption that: Average human being has an inherent dislike of work and will avoid it if he can. Most people must be coerced, controlled and threatened if the organization is to achieve its objectives. The average human avoids responsibility, prefers to be directed, lacks ambition and values security most of all. Theory Y is the assumption that The expenditure of physical and mental effort in work is as natural as rest or play. People will exercise self-direction and self-control in the service of objectives to which they are committed. Given the right conditions, the average worker can learn to accept and to seek responsibility. The capacity for creativity in solving organizational problems is distributed widely in the population. The intellectual potential of the average person is only partially utilised.
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
Commitment to objectives is a function of rewards associated with their achievement. It can be seen that these two theories are two separate attitudes. The central principle of Theory X is direction and control through a centralised system of organisation and the exercise of autocrat or authority, whilst Theory Y is about the integration of individual and organisational goals. In the modern business world leadership works better in Y theory. Although the above-stated theories are dated now, the assumptions of them, however, lie behind most organizational principles today. Application of team leadership in todays organisations will need leaders who understand the organizational principles and develop and exert the effective leadership to influence and change those principles and effectively motivate people to achieve the organizational objectives and coherently accomplish individuals goals.
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
Getting the right people in the right jobs is a lot more important than developing a strategy. This truth applied to all kinds of businessesWe learned hard way that we could have the greatest strategies in the world. Without the right leaders developing and owning them, wed get good-looking presentations and so-so results (Welch, 2001) [7]. The key ingredients of effective project leadership leading to success have been portrayed graphically as shown in Figure 1 (Adapted from Hellregial, D. Slocum, J.W., Jr. & Woodman, R. W.) [8].
Visioning Listening and Questioning Empowering
Influencing
Success
Communicating
Strategizing
Team Building
Figure 1 With these attributes in mind, a simple yet comprehensive, distillation of leadership thought in the context of a project has been suggested as follows (www.maxwideman.com/papers/leader/ definition.htm) [9]: Project leadership is an ability to get things done well through others. It requires: A vision of the destination A compelling reason to get there A realistic timetable, and A capacity to attract a willing team
IDBE 12
and
measuring
results
A project manager is responsible for the planning, coordination and controlling of a project from inception to completion, meeting the project's requirements and ensuring completion on time, within cost and to required quality standards (www.lincoln.ne.gov/city/pworks/engine/dconst/copecnst/ resource/) [12]. It can be seen that Project Management is the process of attaining project goals in an effective and efficient manner through planning, organizing, controlling, and directing organizational resources. It has significant administrative components such as managing, planning, organising, controlling, and monitoring to deliver the project. Both leadership and management processes involve the attainment of organizational goals, but each involves different kinds of functions with different focuses: Managers do things right, while leaders do the right thing (Pascale, 1990) [13]. The respective positions of leaders and managers on a number of issues are outlined in Table 2 [14]. It is clear that project managership is important because this is about getting things done. It is also clear that leadership is equally important to the success of a project because leadership is essentially about motivating people.
Managers focus on
Leadership focuses on
Vision Goals & objectives Selling what and why Telling how and when Long range Shorter range People Organization and structure Democracy Autocracy Enabling Restraining Developing Maintaining Challenging Conforming Originating Imitating Innovating Administrating Motivating & Inspiring trust Directing & controlling Policy Procedures Flexibility Consistency Risk-opportunity Risk-avoidance Top line Bottom line Good managers do the things Good leadership does the right right thing Table 2: Differences in Style
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
IDBE 12
Of the five layers of the pyramid, a Level 5 leader ranks at the top and embodies all five layers and demonstrates the distinguishing traits of the goodto-great leaders. The key inherent qualities and traits Level 5 leaders possessed are concluded as below [16]: Level 5 leaders display a compelling modesty, are self-effacing and understated. Level 5 leaders are fanatically driven, infected with an incurable need to produce sustained results. They are resolved to do whatever it takes to make the company great, no matter how big or hard the decisions. Level 5 leaders display a workmanlike diligence more plow horse than show horse. Level 5 leaders look out the window to attribute success to factors other than themselves. When things go poorly, however, they look in the mirror and blame themselves, taking full responsibility. The above well describes what qualities and traits a person should inherently possess as a leader.
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
Expectation Tell me what you expect of me Opportunity Give me an opportunity to perform Feedback Let me know how I am doing Guidance Give me guidance when and where I need it Reward Reward me according to my contribution For the team to become an SDWT, both of the members of a project team, the followers, and their leaders are expected to interact proactively throughout the process of a project. The leader focuses successively on telling, selling, gelling and producing project activities along with a four-phase careful team development, which is characterized as forming, storming, norming and performing (maxwideman.com/papers/leader/)[18]. The leaders accompanying level of supportive versus directive leadership behaviour should be consistent with the followership development in each of the four phases: In the first, members of the team tend to be quiet, polite, guarded with less communication but business-like. The leader should encourage and take telling actions to get the team acquainted quickly and through telling for the team to be aware of their goals and objectives of conducting the project; In the second, there tends to be conflict over control, individuals may confront one another and, as a result, either become entrenched or opt out. Whilst the leader uses the selling skills to motivate and enable the team to move forward to realize his planning and directing strategies; In the third of gelling versus norming phase, a semblance of organization emerges with the establishment and acceptance of procedures, team skills and focus on issues. Objectives are envisioned and strategies are formed. The team structure is established and systems and procedures are formed to follow. It becomes a focus for the leadership to empower and energize the team to achieve efficiency and effectiveness in the implementation of the project via striking a good balance of playing directive and supportive roles. In the final phase, the team settles down to open and productive effort with trust, flexibility, and a mature closeness which enables self-direction. The leader tends to be more supportive than directive in this phase. This is a team leadership and followership evolution process through careful coherent team and leadership developments. The leader should consciously modify his or her level of directive versus supportive behaviour in response to the progressive evolution of team followership.
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
IDBE 12
It can therefore be seen that it is not enough to be only an effective manager in order to deliver a successful project. One phrase to express it is that management and leadership are symbiotic. Management brings order and structure to leadership and leadership actualises yet elevates management by effectively rallying and empowering the entire team to run extra miles to reach the project objectives and personal development goals. Without both being coherently present, this symbiosis cannot occur.
3.4
Cultivating Leadership
Leadership does not simply happen. It can be taught, learned and developedThere are many ways to leadUltimately, youll know what techniques and approaches work best those you hope to lead will tell you. Much of your ability to get people to do what they have to do is going to depend
By Li Hong Yu Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
on what they perceive when they look at you and listen to you. They need to see someone who is stronger than they are, but human, too (Giuliani, 2002) [19]. A leader should understand that man needs more than financial rewards at work, he also needs some deeper higher order motivation the opportunity to fulfill himself. Leadership can be cultivated and developed in the process of leading and managing followers in conducting a project. Leadership blossoms in the teamwork soils in the form of an unique style and culture belonging to the leader and his/her team under the specific project environment. The leader will learn and master how to strike a good balance of implementation of continuity and change, motivation and administration, inspiration and control during the course of a project, whilst the team will go through a dynamic development process of knowing, conflicting, believing and willingly following their leaders to deliver the success of the project and also achieve their personal development goals in their career life. Leadership is therefore a live learning process which requires a leader to continuously perceive, think and anticipate.
IDBE 12
organisation actually feel being controlled too much, lack of flexibility to do things with their own initiatives which fit to the specific project environment and are bespoke to a customers (clients) requirements. The project leader assigned internally cannot behave out of the restrictions of the system as well. People in such an organisation who undertake a project work will undergo such typical syndromes as outlined below: Passive - Rather than proactive, the project team will perform passively internally to the control system like doing things within the box, externally wont offer what the client wants if what the client wants appears at conflict with their internal system, i.e. people tend not to take risk to go beyond the box and are afraid to speak out so as not to violate the system as a non-conformer. However the consequences to the project may down-perform themselves and at worst lose the business and the client. Low spirit and morale It can be imagined that under such a system people are not willing to take initiatives to work proactively. The project leader tends to follow procedures to manage, control or dictate people and activities. There will be no atmosphere of high-spiritual team working. The morale in the workplace will be undoubtedly low. This will have serious adverse effects on efficiency, quality and productivity. Lack of responsibility - Under the normal situation project managers/leaders will be very much hands-off on projects as they believe their system will enable auto-driving people to carry out the works. Once adverse situation takes place they will land in to deal with the particular issues or crisis, in order to fire-fight. They tend to urge and push or even point fingers to the followers, with no takeup on their own. This is so-called sloping shoulder type of managers. Consequently the followers will adhere to the irresponsibility from the top level with ways to protect themselves from blame and trouble. This kind of irresponsible style in a project environment actually reflects the malmanagement culture of an organisation. Lack of Communication Intercommunication is generally lacked within the organization as the system inherently discourages people to communicate. There is phenomenon that individuals within the company do not talk to each other; inter-team communication and activities rarely exert. There are invisible walls between people and between teams. The organization virtually behaves in a way more like each vertical individual functional column with few of lateral connections across. It wont be a surprise that people working in the same office of the same company do not know each other well in personal level nor understand what others are doing in their work. Effective intercommunications as well as knowledge and experience sharing in the same team and office become impossible and are blocked by the invisible walls, therefore will seriously impact on effective coordination and collaboration. Efficiency and productivity of teamwork and inter-teamwork will be discounted significantly under such circumstances.
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
Painstaking and boring People who work in such a firm tend to behave very carefully and cautiously to prevent trouble and blame on themselves. Frustration and boredom dominate the working atmosphere. Survival may be the only expectation from their work and their career. Vision and personal goals will appear very blurred and remote. It is of no doubt that such an organisation cannot sustain as a top performer in the marketplace in todays increasingly competitive world in spite of its current survival. It is clear from this Essay study that impetus for changes will be a must for such an organisation, a radical shake-up to reform the organisation in the three dimensions way as stated in the previous section 3.1. Effective Leadership needs to be sought and implemented, the cumbersome management procedures need to be abandoned to stop managing but start leading. An efficient and transparent system is to be set up to enable the top management to be accessible to the bottom of the organisation easily and directly in order to observe problems timely and hear the voices of people and find effective ways to resolve decisively through close and effective intercommunications and interactions between leaders and followers. In essence such a problematic organisation should face reality without hesitation. It should embrace change, get rid of bureaucracy, build up harmonic and trustworthy leadership and followership, in order to outperform in todays marketplace and sustain the success in delivering projects and in essence, their business in the increasingly competitive world.
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
process of team development. More importantly a leader should take full responsibility when things do not go right, but behave in a self-effacing and understated manner and be prepared to attribute success to factors other than their own leadership. To look at the practical world today there are some big companies still stubbornly operating in a very bureaucratic and inefficient management sytem and cumbersome procedures. Such an organisation obviously needs to implement modern leadership in order to change the present and adapt the organisation to high competitiveness and business sustainability. The context of this Essay will give an insight into the feasible solutions.
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge
IDBE 12
Bibliography
1. Dilenschneider, Robert L., A Briefing for Leaders, Harper Business, 1991, p5. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. McGregor, Douglas, The Human Side of Enterprise, 1960. Batten, Joe D., Tough-Minded Leadership, AmACOM, 1991, P35 Drucker, 1985, wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/ strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/instco-levc.nsf/en/h_qw 00037e.html Slater, Robert, Jack Welch and the GE Way, 2001, p29 Jack Welch with John A. Byrne, JACK What Ive Learned Leading A Great Company and Great People, 2001, p 383, 384 8. Adapted from Hellregial, D. Slocum, J.W., Jr. & Woodman, R. W., Organizational Behaviour, Sixth Edition, West Publishing Company, 1992, p386 9. http://www.maxwideman.com/papers/leader/ definition.htm
10. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/management 11. home.earthlink.net/~ddstuhlman/ 12. www.lincoln.ne.gov/city/pworks/engine/dconst/ copecnst/resource/ 13. Pascale, Richard, Managing on the Edge? Penguin Book, 1990, pp65 14. Adapted from Warren Bennis on Becoming a Leader, Addison Wesley, 1989; J.W. McLean & William Weitzel Leadership: Magic, Myth or Method?, AMACOM, 1991; Stephen R. Covey Principle-Centered Leadership, Summit Books, 1991. 15. http://www.amputee-coalition.org/communicator/ 16. Collins, Jim, Good to Great, Random House, 2001, p20, p39 17. Batten, Joe D., Tough-Minded Leadership, AmACOM, 1991, P134 18. www.maxwideman.com/papers/leader/ 19. Giuliani , Rudolph W., Leadership, Miramax Books, 2002. Preface pxiii, xiv.
By Li Hong Yu
Univ. of Cambridge