Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
RULE 29
REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH MODES OF DISCOVERY
Section 1. Refusal to answer.
If a party or other deponent refuses to answer any question
upon oral examination, the examination may be completed on
other matters or adjourned as the proponent of the question
may prefer. The proponent may thereafter apply to the
proper court of the place where the deposition is being
taken, for an order to compel an answer. The same procedure
may be availed of when a party or a witness refuses to
answer any interrogatory submitted under Rules 23 or 25.
If the application is granted, the court shall require the
refusing party or deponent to answer the question or
interrogatory and if it also finds that the refusal to
answer was without substantial justification, it may
require the refusing party or deponent or the counsel
advising the refusal, or both of them, to pay the proponent
the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining
the order, including attorneys fees.
If the application is denied and the court finds that it
was filed without substantial justification, the court may
require the proponent or the counsel advising the filing of
the application, or both of them, to pay to the refusing
party or deponent the amount of the reasonable expenses
incurred in opposing the application, including attorneys
fees.
Sec. 2. Contempt of court.
If a party or other witness refuses to be sworn or refuses
to answer any question after being directed to do so by the
court of the place in which the deposition is being taken,
the refusal may be considered a contempt of that court.
Sec. 3. Other consequences.
If any party or an officer or managing agent of a party
refuses to obey an order made under section 1 of this Rule
requiring him to answer designated questions, or an order
under Rule 27 to produce any document or other thing for
inspection, copying, or photographing or to permit it to be
done, or to permit entry upon land or other property, or an
order made under Rule 28 requiring him to submit to a
physical or mental examination, the court may make such
court on motion and notice, may strike out all or any part
of any pleading of that party, or dismiss the action or
proceeding or any part thereof, or enter a judgment by
default against that party, and in its discretion, order
him to pay reasonable expenses incurred by the other,
including attorneys fees.
Sec. 6. Expenses against the Republic of the Philippines.
Expenses and attorneys fees are not to be imposed upon the
Republic of the Philippines under this Rule.
RULE 30
TRIAL
Section 1. Notice of trial.
Upon entry of a case in the trial calendar, the clerk shall
notify the parties of the date of its trial in such manner
as shall ensure his receipt of that notice at least five
(5) days before such date.
Sec. 2. Adjournments and postponements.
A court may adjourn a trial from day to day, and to any
stated time, as the expeditious and convenient transaction
of business may require, but shall have no power to adjourn
a trial for a longer period than one month for each
adjournment, nor more than three months in all, except when
authorized in writing by the Court Administrator, Supreme
Court.
Sec. 3. Requisites of motion to postpone trial for absence
of evidence.
A motion to postpone a trial on the ground of absence of
evidence can be granted only upon affidavit showing the
materiality or relevancy of such evidence, and that due
diligence has been used to procure it. But if the adverse
party admits the facts to be given in evidence, even if he
objects or reserves the right to their admissibility, the
trial shall not be postponed.
Sec. 4. Requisites of motion to postpone trial for illness
of party or counsel.
A motion to postpone a trial on the ground of illness of a
party or counsel may be granted if it appears upon
affidavit or sworn certification that the presence of such
party or counsel at the trial is indispensable and that the
character of his illness is such as to render his nonattendance excusable.
Sec. 5. Order of trial.
Subject to the provisions of section 2 of Rule 31, and
unless the court for special reasons otherwise directs, the
trial shall be limited to the issues stated in the pre-
trial
order
and
shall
proceed
as
follows:
be
governed
by
the