Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

Too many issues, too little time.

Overseas More reports are emerging that iran is set-to-build-second-nuclear-plant; yet, rather than expose this perfidy, the media reports lamely that Iran Stepped-Up Attacks on Israel After Deal Sealed; reinforcing the view that BHOs chief goal was to preclude a pre-emptive Israeli attack is awareness, now, that Israel cannot launch an attack on Iran without the US knowing. Illustrating efforts to assuage angst are assertions of former-iaea-nuclear-expert-olli-heinonen who, while discussing-pitfalls-in the iran-deal that "there is no reason to celebrate" despite verifiable results and a timetable for a final agreement: Nothing in the Iranian nuclear program is being dialed-back; at best, it is a freezing of important elements. The 19,000 centrifuges in its nuclear facilities will continue enriching uranium; none will be mothballed or dismantled in the next six months. Tehran repeatedly operated facilities that were not declared as required by the NonProliferation Treaty (NPT); it hardly ever worked without any reserve capacity, for it has never put all its eggs in one basket. It could have a secret factory somewhere, in contrast with other countries (such as Japan, Germany or Brazil) which, although enriching uranium, are in compliance with their NPT undertakings. Daily visits are confined to the facilities at Natanz and Fordo. Uranium oxide is not harmless, but it takes additional time to convert it back for feeding to the enrichment process. The pact has delayed the Iranians' breakout capacity options (for breaking-away from the existing monitoring system to produce enough weaponsgrade uranium for a bomb) by two months. Admiral Shamkhani, the general secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, is responsible for implementing the agreement, not Rohani; Rouhani is a politician who, like his predecessors, demands transparency from Israel about its nuclear program. The biggest short-term threat clearly lies in Pakistan itself, where there are new missile systems, new tactical nuclear weapons in a country, which is very unstable. I'm not so sure the Pakistanis have their nuclear facilities under control and always know exactly where all materials are being stored, as they claim, for they had no idea the most wanted terrorist in the world lived in the middle of their country. The transport of nuclear materials, which is important for the Pakistan plans to use its tactical weapons, is extremely dangerous; terrorists could get the ultimate weapon with its plutonium. {paraphrased} House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers told CNN's Candy Crowley that the sweeping, Russian-brokered agreement prematurely precluded more wide-ranging armistice between the Syrian regime and opposition forces. Meanwhile, OSLO POLICE have LOST CONTROL OVER THE CITY, mirroring what has been happening throughout Europe, as No-Go Zones/enclaves for Non-Muslims Proliferate (including the police, fire dept and medical first-responders). After Jihadist-terrorists killed, the times [uk] omitted key-facts; on the other hand, even-in-academia, its difficult to sell boycotting-israel.

Domestically Sign-ups may be deterred because 78% Fear ObamaDontCare Site Security; also, it was revealed that the ObamaDontCare website-maker ran a failed Army Human Terrain System program. Guzzardi is hot regarding the Senatorial-Hiroshima which occurred quietly more than a fortnight ago; per Krauthammer, if a bare majority can change the fundamental rules that govern an institution, then there are no rules. Illustrating how racism-charges are used to protect BHO, a-woman-of-faith-who-loves-america [professor of law and political science at Vanderbilt Law School] said blacks-have-been-deceived by BHO, and a [liberal] daily-kos-cartoonist claimed obama-based racism-charges by this [liberal] website are from squishy-liberals trying to be politically-correct. {It is advised the reader note 46 banned books.} The Popes Evangelii Gaudium has been controversial; many claim he was incorrect about capitalism since free-markets are best for the less fortunate {see prior blasts}. Indeed, the Churchs financier [The Church and Capitalism] claimed, [W]e need to see to producing resources before talking about how to distribute them. Otherwise, what we are distributing ispoverty. It is possible that a key error in its translation occurred: This is the passage in question, in the official English translation: 54. In this context, some people continue to defend trickle-down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world. Heres my own inexpert translation from the Spanish version: 54. In this context, some people still defend spillover [trickle-down] theories, which suppose that all economic growth, favored by the free market, by itself brings about greater equity and social inclusion in the world. I wouldnt venture to try translating from Italian, but Google gives me a result thats closer to my rendering of the Spanish than to the Vaticans English version. Im guessing, but have not confirmed, that either the Spanish or the Italian is the original. Notice the differences: The Spanish version states that the free market favors economic growth; the English version makes that sound like a mere theory. The Spanish version says that growth by itself will not bring about social equitya proposition that all but the most doctrinaire libertarians would accept. The English omits that important phrase. In the next sentence, the Pope says that the theory described in #54 has never been confirmed by the facts. If he is saying that economic growth has not brought about greater equity, as the English version suggests, the facts are actually quite heavily stacked against him. If hes saying that growth by itself hasnt done the trick, thats a much easier argument to defend. Some claim the gop should focus on limited government in 2014 but, since Complacency is dangerous, its necessary to Beware of Happy Talk on Immigration; Boehner could again break the Hastert Rule. Thus, those in PA-8 who adore Mike [as has this physician] must weigh data demonstrating his proclivity

to vote with the Dems [c/o this heritage action scorecard in pa]; the gap with other Rs is undeniable. This is Guzzardis prcis: Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick (R-PA) is only 10 percentage-points higher than expected gubernatorial candidate, Rep. Alyson Schwartz (D-PA) [33%-23%]. He is also outscored by two Dems: Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN) and Rep. Jim Matheson (D-UT) [both at 37%]. To provide some perspective, Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) is at 76%, Rep. Joe Pitts (R-PA) is at 79% and Rep. John McCain (R-AZ) is at 43%. PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA 9 10 3 18 5 11 7 15 6 8 13 1 17 4 16 12 REP. SCOTT PERRY REP. JOE PITTS REP. KEITH ROTHFUS SEN. PATRICK TOOMEY REP. BILL SHUSTER REP. TOM MARINO REP. MIKE KELLY REP. TIM MURPHY REP. GLENN THOMPSON REP. LOU BARLETTA REP. PAT MEEHAN REP. CHARLIE DENT REP. JIM GERLACH REP. MICHAEL FITZPATRICK REP. ALLYSON SCHWARTZ REP. ROBERT BRADY R R R R R R R R R R R R R R D D 88% 79% 77% 76% 68% 64% 55% 55% 51% 44% 44% 40% 40% 33% 23% 21% 21%

REP. MATT CARTWRIGHT D

PA PA PA

2 14

REP. CHAKA FATTAH REP. MIKE DOYLE SEN. BOB CASEY

D D D

19% 13% 3%

Вам также может понравиться