Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Reservoir Thickness, h, Well radii, rw,, Viscosity, , Porosiy, , Formation volume factor, Bo, Well oil flow rate, qsc, Total compressibility, ct,
Table 2. Pressure and derivative versus time data for the observation well. Test duration t, hours Gauge pressure, psi Delta pressure, p, psi Derivative, dp/dlnt, psi
0 0.001 0.01 0.1 0.75 1.416667 3.2 4.95 6.95 10.9 16.38333 22.451 40.25
3253 3252.8 3251.3 3239.4 3198 3180 3154 3141 3130 3116 3106 3099 3083.6
0.2 1.6 10.4 26.4 29.9 30.5 31.3 31.9 27.7 26.2 26.7 26.2
(a) Use type curve matching of pressure change (or delta pressure) and derivative to estimate permeability k, wellbore storage coefficient C, and skin factor S using Bourdet et al. type curves. (b) Determine whether we can perform semi-log analysis of pressure data. If so, determine the time interval for which semilog analysis can be performed. Then, perform semi-log analysis of pressure data to determine permeability and skin factor. Discuss and compare your results found. Semilog plot of pressure data is given below. Solution 1-a. My match is shown below and my match points are shown in figure below: We determine k from pressure-match points as:
k=
CD =
CD =
s=
CDe2 s 1 ln 2 CD
1 3 = ln = 4.8 2 4.15 10 4
1000
100
10 Match Points (p)M = 10 psi,( t)M = 1 hr (pD)M = 0.2, (tD/CD) = 3.7 (CDe2s)M = 3 1
0.1 0.001
0.01
10
100
(c) If we use Rameys 1-1/5 log-cycle rule, the semilog-straight line should start at 0.6 hr because the unit-slope line ends at about 0.02 hr. Based on our match where derivative becomes 0.5 within 1% percent, the start of semilog line is at about 39 hr. So, we can perform semilog analysis of this drawdown data. The semilog plot of pressure vs. time is shown below:
3280
3240
3200
3160
3120
3080
3040 0.01
0.1
1 Time t (hr)
10
100
m=
pi pwf ,1hr k + 3.23 log S = 1.151 2 m ct rw 3253 3177.31 80.3 = 1.151 log + 3.23 5 2 58.38 0.15 1.1 10 0.94 0.3 = 4.9