Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A. Prashant
Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA, 37996, E-mail: aprashan@utk.edu
D. Penumadu
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA, 37996, E-mail: dpenumad@utk.edu, Phone: 865-974-2355, Fax: 865-974-2669
Keywords: Kaolin Clay, Failure criterion, stress-strain behavior, strain localization, 3-D analysis
ABSTRACT: The data obtained from a study on Kaolin clay using True Triaxial Testing on cubical specimens suggest that strain localization occurs during the hardening regime of clay, which leads to a sudden failure response within the specimen. In the absence of localized deformations the soil element may sustain higher state of stress, which is proposed in this paper as the reference stress state. This paper concentrates on the significance of reference stress state with respect to the variation of material stiffness and peak shear stress under sudden failure conditions. The discussion includes a comparison between the reference surface and failure envelope in 3-D stress space based on the experimental observations.
1 Introduction
In an experimental study by the authors, a series of flexible-boundary true triaxial undrained tests was performed on the cubical specimens of normally consolidated to heavily overconsolidated Kaolin clay (Prashant & Penumadu, 2004a, 2005). The specimens were subjected to various proportional loading stress paths by maintaining a constant strain rate along major principal direction. The specimens experienced strain localization at peak shear stress level before shearing to large deformations. In many cases, a sudden change in the stress-strain relationship was observed at the failure locations, which was primarily induced by the displacement discontinuities developed within the specimen. The post-failure response is defined as the critical state where a deforming soil element experiences large shear deformation under constant deviatoric stress. In most of the constitutive theories of frictional materials, the pre-failure elasto-plastic deformation is modelled by considering its strong relationship with failure stress state parameters. It is assumed that when a soil element is subjected to shear loading, it yields consistently following a hardening rule and smoothly reaches a stress state where continuously decreasing shear stiffness becomes zero, which the authors define as a reference state. The true triaxial experimental data presented in this paper suggests that the strain localization occurs during hardening of clay, which leads to a sudden failure response within the specimen. It should be noted that the use of flexible boundary conditions minimizes the interference of external boundaries on the specimen deformation. In the absence of localized deformation, the soil element may sustain higher stress and eventually reach the reference state. In such a condition, it is important to distinguish between the definition of the
failure stress state and the reference state of clay, and this is the focus of the current paper. In sudden failure conditions, the reference surface corresponds to a virtual state of stress that is possible if the specimen does not experience deformation localizations. A method of determining the state of stress at reference state is presented by using an approach describing the stress-strain relationship using hyperbolic functions. The shape of reference surface and failure surface for Kaolin clay is evaluated in 3-D stress space using the true triaxial data. The shapes of these surfaces, especially in the deviatoric plane, are found to be significantly different.
b=
3 2 1 3
(1)
The complete experimental data and the relevant analysis were published earlier in Prashant & Penumadu (2004a, 2005). The triaxial compression (b = 0) tests were also performed for three additional OCR values, OCR = 1.5, 2, and 10. During all the tests performed in this study the preconsolidation pressure before shearing was constant at 275 kPa. A part of the data from these experimental studies has been used in this paper concentrating on the significance of the reference state. Figure 1 shows the stress-strain relationships and the pore pressure evolution in terms of the change in mean effective stress for b = 0, 0.5, and 1.0. For the following analysis, the mean effective stress p, deviator stress q, and the shear strain q were calculated from the general invariant expressions: (2) +3 ) 3 p = ( 1 + 2
OCR = 1 OCR = 5
160 120 80
OCR = 1
-p' (kPa)
0.05
0.15
0.2
(a)
(b)
Figure 1. Stress-strain relationship and change in mean effective stress during true triaxial undrained shearing with b = 0, 0.5, and 1.0
q=
) + ( 2 3 ) + ( 3 1 ) ( 1 2
2 2
(3)
q =
1 2 2 2 2 ( 1 2 ) + ( 2 3 ) + ( 3 1 ) 3
(4)
Here, 1, 2, and 3 are the major, intermediate and minor principal stresses measured along three axes of the cubical specimen, where 1, 2, and 3 are the corresponding normal strains.
Reference State
Figure 2. Smooth failure and Sudden failure conditions In presence of the strain localizations within the specimens, the global loading and displacement measurements can not describe the representative stress and strain state of the specimen; and therefore, this information can not be used directly to develop the constitutive equations for modelling the mechanical behaviour of soil. The use of flexible boundaries allows for measuring the true stress state within the specimen even when the localization has occurred; however, the strain information can only be obtained by measuring the local displacement profile.
the authors proposed a constitutive model for normally to overconsolidated clays in an earlier publication (Prashant and Penumadu 2004b); however, the formulation was described only for the triaxial compression conditions. It is apparent from the above discussion that the reference state concept would play a more significant role in describing the model in 3-D stress space, which is further emphasized in the discussion hereafter.
q = q1
Where,
a +
q1
( a + ult )
1 1+ + qo ult 1+
(5)
q1 =
Here, qo is initial deviatoric stress, Go is initial shear stiffness, ult is shear strain corresponding to zero shear stiffness, and is a curve fitting parameter. Using the modified approach, the hyperbolic function was used to represent the stress-strain relationships observed during the cubical triaxial tests on normally and overconsolidated Kaolin clay. It was assumed that the reference state would be reached at a shear strain value of 25%, which was determined based on a regression analysis. Figure 3 shows some typical examples of the curve fitting of the stress-strain relationships. Since the cubical specimens were sheared from an initially isotropic effective stress state, the initial value of deviatoric stress q was zero. However, use of hyperbolic or modified hyperbolic function was not able to fit the whole curve when the initial deviatoric stress qo was assumed to be zero. Since the objective was to determine the reference state and the interest was only in the later part of the curve, a positive value of qo was assumed to obtain the best fit curve for the later part of the curve, as shown in Fig. 3. By using the double hyperbolic functions, the need of a non-zero qo can be eliminated without compromising the accuracy of the fit. However, the formulation of double hyperbolic function with the constraint of zero shear stiffness at a finite strain value becomes relatively complex. Considering the good fit obtained for the later part of the curve using the modified single hyperbolic function, the double hyperbolic function is not expected to show a significant difference in the obtained values of deviatoric stress at the reference state. Therefore, the option of double hyperbolic function was discarded in this study. Since the specimens were sheared under undrained conditions, it is necessary to determine the excess pore pressure or the
b=1 Reference State (For both b=0 and b=1) b=0 OCR = 1
b=0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Shear Strain, eq
Shear Strain, eq
(a)
(b)
Figure 3. Method of determining reference stress state using hyperbolic functions mean effective stress at the reference state. This is because the soil is a pressure dependent material, and shear stiffness and strength of a soil element depends on the applied mean effective stress. For all the cubical triaxial data, the mean effective stress at reference stress state was determined using the same approach that was used for the stress-strain relationships.
z OCR=1
z OCR=5
J2' surface I3 surface Experimental reference surface Reference state Failure point
J2' surface
from the series of undrained true triaxial tests (for different b-values) performed on the normally consolidated (OCR = 1) and moderately overconsolidated (OCR = 5) specimens of Kaolin clay. This figure also shows the data points corresponding to reference stress state. Although, the significance of sudden failure caused by the strain localization varied with the b-value, the shear failure stress state can be reasonably described using the I3 = constant (for a deviatoric plane) surface for both the OCR values. (6) . 3 I 3 = 1. 2 The I3 and J2 surfaces at each deviatoric plane have been calibrated using the data from triaxial compression (b = 0) tests. The reference stress states followed a different pattern than the failure points in deviatoric plane. The surface connecting the reference stress states for different b-values lies between the I3 and J2 surfaces, as shown in Fig. 4, for the kaolin clay used in this study. The deviation of reference surface from J2 surface in Fig. 4 indicates some influence of the stress anisotropy; however, the shear strength behavior shows much stronger influence.
)OC ( Su vo ( Su vo ) NC
= OCR o
(7)
Here, vo is the initial effective vertical stress, and o is a soil constant. In this study of consolidated undrained shear tests, vo was the pre-shear isotropic consolidation pressure. In Fig. 5b, Eq. 7 is plotted on a semi log scale using the undrained shear strength data from this study. The normalization of reference state shear stress using the same equation is also included in Fig. 5b. The failure points and reference states both follow an identical logarithmic relationship with OCR
10
Su vo OC Su vo NC
40 80 120 160
1
y=x0.9 x o = 0.9 1 10
(a)
(b)
Figure 5. (a) Failure and reference stress states in q-p space, (b) Normalization of undrained shear strength and reference stress states for overconsolidation level
value, and show a value of parameter o = 0.9. This relationship again supports that the assumption of the same shape for reference surface and failure surface in q-p space was a reasonable choice.
6 Conclusions
During an experimental study of the true triaxial behaviour of Kaolin clay, the cubical specimens showed an abrupt loss of the shear stiffness at failure location due to localized deformations within the specimens. This sudden failure response of the soil was discussed in this paper, which originated the need for defining a virtual stress state corresponding to the expected failure location in the absence of strain localizations. This stress state was termed as the reference state, where the shear stiffness gradually decreased to zero during continuous shearing of the soil element. A method of determining the reference stress state was presented using the measured data from this study. It was observed that a reference surface, defining the pre-failure yielding of soil, should be separated from the failure surface in sudden failure conditions. The reference surface and failure surface were observed to have significantly different shapes in general stress space.
7 Acknowledgements
Financial Support from National Science Foundation (NSF) through grants CMS-9872618 and CMS-0296111 is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.
8 References
Duncan, J.M., Chang, C.Y. 1970. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 96(SM5), 1629-1653. Griffiths, D.V., Prevost, J.H. 1990. Stress strain curve generation from triaxial parameters. Int. J. Num. Anal. Methods in Geomech., Technical note on practical applications, 14(8), 587-594. Kondner, R.L. 1963. Hyperbolic stress strain response: cohesive soils. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 89(SM1), 115-143. Ladd, C.C., Foott, R. 1974. New Design Procedure for stability of Soft Clays. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 100(7), 763-786. Mandeville, D., Penumadu, D. 2004. True Triaxial Testing System for Clay with Proportional-Integral-Differential Control. ASTM, Geotechnical Testing Journal, 27(2), GTJ11756, 1-12. Mayne, P.W. 1979. Discussion of Normalized Deformation parameters for Kaolin By H. G. Poulos. Geotechnical Testing Journal. 1(2), 102-106. Prashant A., Penumadu D. 2004a. Effect of intermediate principal stress on overconsolidated kaolin clay. J. Geotech. and Geoenv. Eng., 130(3), 284-292. Prashant, A, Penumadu, D. 2004b. Modeling the effect of overconsolidation on shear behavior of cohesive soils. Proc. 9th Symp. Num. Models in Geomech., Ottawa(Canada), 131-137. Prashant, A, Penumadu, D. 2004c. Experimental analysis of yielding and strain localization of moderately overconsolidated kaolin clay. Proc. 17th ASCE Engrg. Mech. Conference. In CD, Paper No. 264, 1-8. Prashant A., Penumadu D. 2005. A Laboratory Study of Normally Consolidated Kaolin Clay. Can. Geotech. J., in print, 1-32.