Central Information Commission,

II,Floor,August Kranti bhavan, Bhikaji Kama Place

New Delhi- 110 067.

Madam/Sir,
Re: Second Appeal under under Sec 19(3)of the Right to Information Act-2005

Name and address of the appellant: ShriGopal Soni, (revribhav@gmail.com)
(Tel.01452644106) C231,PanchSheel Nagar,Ajmer-305 004.

Name and address of the CPIO: Pranab Kumar Sahu,,Chief MANAGER & CPIO,
New India Assurance Co. Ltd,{NIACL},87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001.
E-mail: <pranabkumar.sahu@newindia.co.in>

Name and address of the Central Public Authority against the order of whom the appeal is
preferred: Renjit Gangadharan,Dy General Manager, New India Assurance Co.
Ltd,{NIACL},87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001.

Particulars of the order against which the appeal is preferred:
HO Appeal No. 207/2013 dated 29.11.2013 ( annexure A4 )


Compensation Sought: The appellant prays for compensation as per clause in Sec 19(8)* of
the RTI Act to the detriment suffered because of prolonged denial of information

Brief facts leading to the appeal:
The appellant ,an honest citizen of India sought information under RTI dated 2.08.2013 ( A1)
pertaining to denial/forefeiture of Provident Fund (own contribution) on behalf of NIACL and the
officials involved in prolonged denial of P F. The NIACL CPIO submitted a rhetorically drafted
annexure suppressing the desired information .The appellant, vide appeal dt.30.09.2013
requested disclosure of information to FAA . However, the said Renjeet
Gangadharn who abused needless public money by air travel to CIC on 20
th
May 2013 instead
of attending prescribed mode video conference from Mumbai tried to justify the reply of CPIO

Prayer or Relief sought: 1. The information pertains to Right to Life of the applicant, who suffers
as he does not compromise with dishonesty. kindly order for immediate disclosure of information.
2. That obstruction to information be viewed seriously and responsible official be penalized under
Section 20 (10) of the Act.

Compensation Sought: The appellant prays for compensation as per clause in Sec 19(8)* of
the RTI Act related to the detriment suffered since long denial of information.

Grounds for the Prayer or Relief: 1.The RTI officials of the public authority argue like advocates
instead of application of mind.
2. There is no attempt to ensure humanitarian disclosure of information either by CIPO or FAA
3. Vigilance pledge has been ignored by both CPIO and FAA WE, THE PUBLIC
SERVANTS OF INDIA, DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY PLEDGE THAT WE SHALL CONTINUOUSLY
STRIVE TO BRING ABOUT INTEGRITY AND TRANSPARENCY without fear or favour.
Whether 2 sets of appeal attached:Yes
Whether self -attested all documents:Yes
Page numbering (bottom to top):
A1: Application under RTI act.dt..2.08.13 A2: Reply of CPIO dt.3.09.2013 A3. First Appeal
dt.30.09.13. A4. Order of FAA dt. 29.11.13 A5. Rule of law-PF cannot be deducted A6. E
mail copy of a set sent to CPIO and 1st appellate authority .
. I verify that the facts mentioned above are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief,the matters under appeal have not previously been
filed,or pending with any court or tribunal or with any other authority.
Yours Sincerely,
(ShriGopal Soni),Appellant, Ajmer (Rajasthan).
Dt. 11-12-2013
P.S. The appellant requests video conference hearing .
11.12.13 Second appeal RTI 2.8.13 vitt NIACL PF
rev ribhav2 <revribhav2@gmail.com> Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:54 PM
To: "segar.sampath" <segar.sampath@newindia.co.in>, "renjeet.gangadharan"
<renjeet.gangadharan@newindia.co.in>, "pranabkumar.sahu"
<pranabkumar.sahu@newindia.co.in> <rti.ho@newindia.co.in>

CPIO/FAA/Transparency Officer
New India Assurance Co. Ltd,
87,M.G. road,Fort,MUMBAI-400001.
Dear Sir,
Being an honest citizen of India who has not compromised with corruption in public life
prevalent in the NIACL,I continue to be denied of every one of my constitutional and
humanitarian rights including my own Provident Fund.
Please find attached copy of second appeal (RTI act).
regards,
Shri Gopal Soni
C231,Panchsheel Nagar,
AJMER-305004

A 6 Email: to pranabkumar.sahu@newindia.co.in
Pranab Kumar Sahu,,Chief MANAGER & CPIO,
New India Assurance Co Ltd,
( NIACL),87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001

Madam/Sir,
Re: Information of Second Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005
With reference to My application under the R.T.I.Act
2.8.2013 reply by you CPI/Ho/2013-14/189 suppressing the information
the applicant herewith files second appeal* against denial of
information by you as the CPIO and against the decision of
appellate authority under Appeal No.107/2013 that CPIO reply was
enough .Kindly be informed as above.

Shri Gopal Soni,C231,Panch Sheel Nagar,Ajmer -305004.
(appellant)
Enclosed: as above * Dt.11-12-2013



A7 Email: to renjit.gangadharan@newindia.co.in
Renjit Gangadharan,Dy General Manager,
New India Assurance Co Ltd, ( NIACL),
87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001

Dear Sir,
Re: Information of Second Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005

With reference to RTI application dt.2.8.2013 Appeal to you
dt.30.9.2013 the applicant herewith files second appeal* against
denial of information by the CPIO and your mechanical reply,as
appellate authority under Appeal No.107/2013 that CPIO responded
,thus, denial of information in the matter. Kindly be informed.

Shri Gopal Soni,C231,Panch Sheel Nagar,Ajmer -305004.
(appellant)
Enclosed: as above * Dt.11-12-2013



Appellate Authority (RTI) 30.09.2013
New India Assurance Co. Ltd,
87,M.G. Road, Fort,
Mumbai-400001.
Re: Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005 application 2.08.2013
Incomplete and mischievous reply of insurance company CPIO under CPI
cell/HO/2013-14/189 dated 03.09.2013*
Appeal:
The CPIO ,NIACL furnished an evasive, distorted and mischievous
reply consisting of two pages.
The applicant submits that he has been denied of his own Provident
Fund which amounts to forefeiture of his provident fund.
The Head Office of the insurance company is bound to supply a
speaking order to justify denial /forefeiture of the provident fund
(own contribution ) of the applicant.
The appellant has never authorized any NIACL official to deduct from
his Provident Fund a single rupee without his explicit consent.
The CPIO,be ordered to supply the complete,correct and transparent
information of denial /forefeiture/deduction of provident fund of the
applicant including the details of officials responsible for illegal and
inhuman act.
That all information is essential to right to life of a hapeless citizen of India,
Yours sincerely,
Shri Gopal Soni, (appellant) revribhav@gmail.com
C231, Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004 Tel.01452644106.
*enclosed with annexure
Joint Secretary (Insurance ) 2.08.2013
Ministry of Finance,Deptt. of Financial Services
Room No. 3, Jeevan Deep Building
Parliament Street, New Delhi - 110 001
Sir, Re: Information under the RTI Act-2005
With reference to the above,the applicant is depositing the prescribed fee
*attached herewith.
1. The applicant seeks copy of his RTI application dated 15
th
May 2013
that was forwarded by Ministry vide letter dated 3.06.2013 under F. No.
M-18011/45/2013-Ins.1
2. The applicant,being denied of his own provident fund to cause his death
as a poor man,in collusion by New India Assurance Company Ltd,high
ranking officials,seeks information of all rules,regulations under which
the insurance company reserves right to forefeit* the provident fund of
an employee
3. Name and designation of all New India Assurance Company officials
who either individually or collectively ordered forefeiture* of
applicants provident fund.
*alternatively called deduction euphemistically
The cumulative effect is that those employees get relief who gratify the greed
of corrupt officials and the innocent ones suffer for years like the applicant
whisle- blower victimized on the charge of leaving HQ in retaliation of his
commitment for honesty and transparency in publif life as an RTI applicant.
Yours Sincerely,
(SHRI GOPAL SONI),
C231,PANCHSHEEL NAGAR,
AJMER-305004. Tel.0145-2644106
Thanking You. enc.: IPO NO.17F 399482
Annexure: l li -
pqfuUnk tu
lsod dh
lwfp
ii-ii ln
l-|inn i i
li i
n-i| ii
n-i l->iln
n
-i
28470
l- r| li
ni n
- r| -i
li-|- ->iiini
ln i>i n ri>i
i ni 10
| 2009 i
- i-i lrn -ii i -
ilin ri i i
n , nini n l,
i>i --n lii |
za n l n.
z n
-i
22828
| | i; li -
li i
;-ii -ili
i |s i n|
i in
nin ra ri |
-in ili
ni i; n;
n-i iiii ii
ii|
RC 26(A)1991 nrn
CBI ,ii - ~-|
iil iir| rn | |
i; ir i li
ni| -i iilni
|
3. n
-i
26019
ln ii| i
- n ri>i i
in i|
l -
i-ii lii i
,ii | zaas -
i ni
za i; zaz i
i ,
n-i| ii|
-| -
i>i ii ni.
nin s ri -il
n i>i --n lii
-|n
in iln i
li ni
4,
n
-i
13559
|i - ri
/ i in i|
i ni ll-n r i
r| ii-n
| | i; i; i
c.as.ssc i
r.sc ii i |-i
iiiii|
rc ri -il n
- ri
| -ni l.z/.a/.ss i
i li