Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Dieter Gernert Citation: AIP Conference Proceedings 573, 452 (2001); doi: 10.1063/1.1388711 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1388711 View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/proceeding/aipcp/573?ver=pdfcov Published by the AIP Publishing
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 181.114.121.159 On: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 01:39:58
CP573, Computing Anticipatory Systems: CASYS 2000 - Fourth International Conference, edited by D. M. Dubois 2001 American Institute of Physics 0-7354-0012-1/017$ 18.00 452
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 181.114.121.159 On: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 01:39:58
below. Such a system can be easily implemented on any standard PC, and it will stimulate a great variety of experiments. The first requirement is related to the capacity of performing certain characteristic operations. Considering here only the most important classes of operations, we need operations which can be understood as learning (changing the internal state as a consequence of a received input), conclusions from propositions stored within the system, and valuations (e.g. valuations of new input or of conclusions derived).2) As the second requirement, the system must consist of independent subsystems (with some coordination and cooperation) such that each subsystem is able to perform meaningful operations of the types named just before, and any two subsystems can work in parallel.
For many details, which are not necessary for the present topic, reference is made to a technical paper (Gernert, 2000). Only in the case of primitive material which can (and must) be handled by rote-learning the temporal order is irrelevant. 4 As far as can be seen, Matsuno was the first to point out the relationship between time and information. 5 In spite of the well-known relations, the concept of information cannot be completely based upon or reduced to entropy. Rather, the traditional (syntactical, Shannon-Weaver) information theory can be embedded and is included as a special case in a more comprehensive concept (Gernert, 1996, with further references).
3
453
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 181.114.121.159 On: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 01:39:58
theory. The most important difference lies in the fact that, given two operators X and Y, neither ,,-Y" nor ,,X - Y" has been defined until now. Hence, we are facing a problem circumscribed by the following two questions: - What does it exactly mean that two operations are performed ,,in parallel" or ,,simultaneously"? - Given an operator Y, can ,,-Y" be consistently defined, and, if yes, will it be uniquely defined? For this purpose we introduce a neutral element 0 such that
Y + 0 = 0 + Y = Y (for all Y e A) (1)
Keeping in mind that +" means parallel execution, this means that one subsystem undergoes the transformation Y, whilst another subsystem remains unchanged, and the outcome only depends on Y. Now it is natural to define -Y by
Y + (-Y) = 0 (2)
and to introduce the abbreviation X - Y for X + (-Y). Then, (2) will mean that in two subsystems the two operations X and Y are performed simultaneously, but the overall state of the system will be the same as before when the execution of these operations will be finished. In this moment, the term simultaneous" must be discussed more carefully. Any concept of continuously flowing time (as e.g. in Newtonian physics) will be inadequate here. There must be some ,,internal clock" that defines finite and discrete intervals of time, called ,,time windows", with the following property: If and only if two operations X and Y are performed within the same time window, a possible contradiction between the outcomes of X and Y will be detected (with the consequence that the system will remain unchanged). Hence, two operations can be denoted as simultaneous if both are completely performed within the same time window (a partial overlap of their execution time does not suffice). When we now regard the contents of the two operations, we e.g. can have Lk = -Li, which means that two items of information received from outside contradict each other, such that (with a reservation still to be made) the system remains unchanged. In a similar way, there may be a discrepancy between the results of two acts of conclusion (Q, Ck e C) or between two valuations (Vi, Vk e V). A special technical requirement which is to guarantee that -X is uniquely defined must be skipped here. An important question is still open: Is it really possible that the effects of two simultaneous operations precisely compensate each other, or will there persist some inevitable side effect or ,,remainder"? The answer depends upon the ,,global organization" of the information-processing system. In the simpler cases, the system detects that there is a contradiction, and ignores both operators involved and their results. But within special systems, the fact that e.g. Lj and Lk disagree may be of interest by itself: this contradiction supplies a hint that at least one of the two underlying external sources of information is dubious and unreliable. Then, the system can be prepared to register just this special finding additionally. Indeed, the evaluation of cues concerning the reliability of information sources is a central issue in ,,governmental intelligence"6^; other side effects may occur in less dramatic situations. Now we can characterize time windows by the finite span of time such that two operations (or, if necessary, two operations of special kinds) occurring within that span of time are confronted with each other; depending on their contents it is possible that they neutralize each other.
454
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 181.114.121.159 On: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 01:39:58
- It may vary with side conditions, like the length of incoming sequences of signals or the complexity of internal derivation processes. - It may be controlled by internally defined parameters, e.g. a maximum time allowance for trial-and-error processes in problem-solving tasks, or by newly developed valuations. - It may change with the lifetime of the system.
5 CONCLUDING REMARKS
If it is accepted that there is a nearly constant length of time windows, we may ask for the reason behind it. Is such a technique of organization more economical - will the system run more easily if a ,,rhythm" is predefined? Is there possibly an underlying optimality principle? Anyway, we should keep in mind that in computer science some care must be taken about the coordination of concurrent processes, whilst in humans parallel processes are already coordinated. Present foundational problems of modern physics perhaps are due to an inadequate concept of time, particularly to an overemphasis of continuum (Ruhnau, 1992, p. 171). This is mirrored by the relative weight of continuous mathematics (differential and integral calculus, etc.) within the mathematical tools for physicists. A slight trend can be recognized towards a more intensive use of algebraic structures in theoretical physics (from quaternions to various types of operator algebras). A total separation between subjective and objective time will not be required, if it is kept in mind that the time of natural scientists is connected with the scientists' personal acting and experiencing (Janich, 1996, p. 830). Ruhnau (1992) accentuates ,,structural and procedural similarities" between both concepts of time, which possibly may form a basis for a different view of time. It can be hoped that also the approach sketched here will make a small contribution to a bridge across that gap.
REFERENCES
1. 2. 3.
7
Adamatzky, Andrew (2000). Pathology of collective data: automata models. Appl. Math. Comput, in press. Atmanspacher, Harald (1998). Exophysics, endophysics, and beyond. Int. J. Comput. Anticip. Syst. 2, 105-114. Gernert, Dieter (1996). Pragmatic information as a unifying concept. In: Klaus Kornwachs and Konstantin Jacoby (Eds.),
For an overview of Bergson's contributions see Goudge (1967) and Lacey (1995).
455
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 181.114.121.159 On: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 01:39:58
4. 5.
6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
Information - New Questions to a Multidisciplinary Concept. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, p. 147-162. Gernert, Dieter (2000). Towards a closed description of observation processes. BioSystems 54, 165-180. Goudge, T.A. (1967). Bergson, Henri. In: P. Edwards (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Macmillan, New York, vol. 1, p. 287-295. Guala, Elda and Paolo Boero (1999). Time complexity and learning. In: Claudio Rossi et al. (Eds.), Tempos in Science and Nature (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 879). New York Academy of Sciences, New York, p. 164-167. Gunji, Yukio-Pegio (1998). Asynchronous tuning and invalidating boundary. Acta Polytechn. Scand. (Ser. Math, etc.) Ma91,71-80. Janich, Peter (1996). Zeit. In: Jurgen Mittelstrass (Ed.), Enzyklopadie Philosophic und Wissenschaftstheorie. Metzler, Stuttgart, vol. 4, p. 827-831. Lacey, A.R. (1995). Bergson. In: Ted Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 88-89. Matsuno, Koichiro (1996). Internalist stance and the physics of information. BioSystems 38, 111-118. Matsuno, Koichiro (1998a). Emergent phenomena of time in quantum mechanics. Acta Polytechn. Scand. (Ser. Math, etc.) Ma91,61-70. Matsuno, Koichiro (1998b). Dynamics of time and information in dynamic time. BioSystems 46, 57-71. Poppel, Ernst (1988). Grenzen des Bewusstseins. Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, Stuttgart (second edition). Poppel, Ernst and Kerstin Schill (1992). Zeitliche Koordinationsprobleme mentaler Prozesse. KI nr. 2, 7-12. Ruhnau, Eva (1992). Zeit - das verborgene Fenster der Kognition. Kognitionswissenschaft 2, 171-179. Varela, Francisco J. (1999). A dimly perceived horizon: the complex meeting ground between physical and inner time. In: Claudio Rossi et al. (Eds.), Tempos in Science and Nature (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 879). New York Academy of Sciences, New York, p. 143-153. Watson, B.W., S.M. Watson, and G.W. Hopple (Eds.) (1990). United States Intelligence. An Encyclopedia. Garland, New York.
456
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 181.114.121.159 On: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 01:39:58