You are on page 1of 13

I RICHARDE.

WTNNIE(68048)
COI.INTYCOUNSEL
2 COLTNTYOF ALAMEDA
a
J RICHARDS,VTATSON& GERSHON
A ProfessionalCorporation
4 SAYREWEAVERTII6957\
T. PETERPIERCE(TOO+OSi
5 355 SouthGrandAvènue.4óthFloor
Los Angeles,CA 90071
6 Telephone: (213)626-8484
'7
Facsimile:(213) 626-007
8
Attorneysfor Defendants,
8 MARY V. KING. et al.
9
UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT
.t-
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
z.= T2
O =
(/r P RUSSELLALLEN NORDYKE.et al.. CaseNo. CV -99-04389-MJJ
N * É
r¡J 3
13
r-9 ¿ Plaintiffs, AMENDED ANSWERTO
z.= T4 TTTIRDAMENDED COMPLAINT
(O/ ) ø* v.
15
k E MARY V. KING, et al.,
-== i r6
rn5
ô k Defendants.
É

< Zì
. q
t7
T
( J 9
tv z. 18
(
'^-Yi ,t.
19 DefendantsMARY V. KING, GAIL STEELE, WILMA CHAN, KEITH
20 CARSON, SCOTT HAGGERTY, THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, and THE COLINTY
2l OF ALAMEDA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (collectively "County"), for themselves
22 alone and for no other defendants,answerPlaintiffs' "Third Amended and/or
23 SupplementalComplaint for Damages,Injunction, and Declarutory Judgment" ("Third
24 Amended Complaint") as follows:
25 l. Answering parugraph1, the County admits the allegations.
26 2. Answering paragraphZ,the County admits the allegations.
27 3. Answering parugraph3, the County admits the allegations.
28 4. Answeringparagraph 4, the County admits the allegations.

AMENDED ANSWERTO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT


I 206r\0002\834222.
I
I 5. Answering para$aph 5, the County admits the allegations.
2 6. Answering paragraph6, the County admits the allegations.
a
J 7. Answering paragraph7,the County admits the allegations.
4 8. Answering paragraph8, the County admits and allegesthat plaintiffs f,rled

5 an Amended Complaint or aboutNovember 10, 1999. Except as expresslyadmitted and

6 allegedherein, the County denieseachand every allegation in paragraph8.


1
9. Answering parugraph9, the County admits the allegations.
8 10. Answering paragraph10, the County admits the allegations.
9 11. Answeringparugraph 11, the County admits and allegesthat the Third
10 Amended Complaint speaksfor itself. Except as expresslyadmitted and alleged herein,

11 the County denieseachand every allegation inparagraph 11.


z.= t2 72. Answering paragraphIL,the County admits the allegations.
o ;
- *
( ¡ P
É . 4 13 13. Answering paragraph13, the County admits the allegations.
|lJ3
t e=
2.2 t4 t4. Answeringparagraph 14, the County admits the allegations.
O
(/) Y*ì
15 15. Answeringparagraph15, the County deniesthe allegations.
k E
-== i T6 16. Answering parugraph16, the County admits the allegations.
øl 5
ô ã
É.ø
* i l7 17. Answering parugraph17, the County lacks sufficient information or belief
L d
(-,
_ r P
.,.ta¿, <, t8 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every allegation.
t ú .
'^tu, t9 18. Answering paragraph18, the County deniesthe allegations.
20 19. Answering paragraph19, the County deniesthe allegations.
2l 20. Answering parugraph2D,theCounty deniesthe allegations.
22 2I'. Answering pangraphZl, the County lacks sufficient information or belief
23 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon, denieseach and every allegation.

24 22. Answering paragraph22,the County lacks sufficient information or belief


25 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon, denieseach and every allegation.

26 23. Answeringpalragraphz3, the County lacks sufficient information or belief


27 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon, denieseach and every allegation.

28 t//

AMENDED ANSWERTO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT


12061\0002\834222.1
1 24. Answering paragraph24,the County lacks sufficient information or belief
2 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every allegation.
a
J 25. Answering paragraph25,the County lacks sufficient information or belief
4 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and evely allegation.

5 26. Answering paragraph26, the County lacks suffrcient information or belief


6 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denies each and every allegation.

7 27. Answering paragraph27, the County lacks sufficient information or belief


8 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denies each and every allegation.

9 28. Answering paragraph28, the County lacks sufficient information or belief


t0 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denies each and every allegation.
11 29. Answering paragraph29,the County admits and allegesthat the United
z.= 12 StatesConstitution speaksfor itself. Except as expresslyadmitted and allegedherein, the
O :
- *
(.'tP
É . &
u-l 3
13 County denieseach and every allegation inparagraph}g.
o =
2.3 l4 30. Answering paragaph 30, the County admits the allegation.
3 E t5 3 1. Answering paragaph 3 1, the County admits the allegations.
k E
-== i 16 32. Answering paragraph32, the County admits and allegesthat at one time or
<¡l a
o k
É.ø T7
< à anotherthe identified defendantsare or were duly electedmembersof the Board of
T Z
U
- rP
É 4 . 18 Supervisorsfor the County of Alameda, California. The County further admits and
( v .
\Jø. t9 allegesthat the Court has alreadydeterminedin its Order filed February 14,2005 that it is

20 improper to name individual defendantsin an off,rcial capacity lawsuit such as this one.

2l The stateand federal authorities circumscribing the authority of the Board of Supervisors

22 speakfor themselves. Except as expresslyadmitted and alleged herein, the Counfy denies
23 each and every allegation inparugraph32.
24 33. Answeringparagraph33, the County admits the allegationscontainedin the
25 first two sentences.The County lacks sufficient information or belief to admit or deny
26 the allegationsin the third sentenceand, basedthereon, denies each and every allegation
27 in that sentence.
28 ///

AMENDED ANSWERTO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT


1206l \0002\834222.
I
1 34. Answering paragraph34,the County admits the allegations.
2 35. Answering para$aph 35, the County admits the allegationscontainedin the
a
J first sentence.The County further admits and allegesthat the applicable Federal,State,
4 and County laws referencedin the secondsentencespeakfor themselves. Except as

5 expresslyadmitted and alleged herein, the County denieseach and every allegation in

6 paragraph35.

36. Answering parugraph36,the County deniesthe allegations.


8 37. Answering paragraph37,the County deniesthe allegations.
9 38. Answering paragraph38, the County deniesthe allegations.
10 39. Answeringparagraph 39, the County deniesthe allegations.
11 40. Answeringparagraph 40, the County admits the allegationscontainedin the
z.= T2 first sentence.Except as expresslyadmittedherein, the County denies eachand every
O =
ø tP
tv. ê 13 allegation in paragraph40.
U J 3
r.9 ¿
z.= T4 41. Answeringparagraph 41, the County admits the allegationscontainedin the
o #*
(/l
15 first sentence.The County further admits and allegesthat the Ordinancespeaksfor itself.
k E
= i
un3
T6 Except as expresslyadmitted and allegedherein, the County denieseach and every
ô E
É . q
< ì T7 allegation in parugraph47.
T Z
L,,9
æ- â. 18 42. Answeringparagaph42,the County admits and allegesthat on or about

=3 t9 August 23,1999, County Counsel for Alameda County sent a letter to Richard K.

20 Pickering, General Manager of the Alameda County Fairgrounds,and that the leffer

2l speaksfor itself. Except as expresslyadmitted and alleged herein, the County denieseach

22 and every allegation in paragraph42.

23 43. Answeringparugraph 43, the County lacks sufficient information or belief


24 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every allegationin

25 paragraph43.

26 44. Answering paragraph44, the County deniesthe allegationsin the first


27 sentence.The County lacks sufficient information or belief to admit or deny the
28 allegationsin the secondsentenceand, basedthereon,denies each and every allegation in

AMENDED ANSWERTO TTIIRDAMENDED COMPLAINT


1206r\0002\834222.1
I the secondsentence.

2 45. Answering paragraph 45,the County admits and allegesthat TS Trade


3 Shows rented the fairgrounds for gun showsbetweentwo and four times ayeaÍ, and there
4 may have been one year in which TS Trade Showsrented the fairgrounds five times. The

5 County further admits and allegesthat grossrevenuesto the Alameda County Fair
6 Associationfor all gun showsannuallywas between$70,000and $80,000. Exceptas

7 expresslyadmitted and alleged herein, the County denieseach and every allegationin

8 parugraph45.

9 46. Answering paragraph 46,the County lacks sufficient information or belief


10 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every allegationin
11 paragraph46.
z.= T2 47. Answeringpafagraph 47, the County lacks.sufficient information or belief
O Ë
- Í
L N ?
fv. ¿ 13 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every allegationin
¡JJ3
t 9 ¿
2.2 t4 paragraph4T.
O r{Í
ø ) E
15 48. Answering paragraph48, the County lacks sufficient information or belief
k E
-== i t6 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every allegationin
vta
â k
É , q
< à T7 parugraph 48.
T z
q J P
,o¿. 4 18 49. Answering paragraph 49,the County lacks sufficient information or belief
\ ú .
'..3. L9 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every allegationin

20 paragraph49.

2T 50. Answeringparagraph 50, the County deniesthe allegations.


22 51. Answering paragraph51, the County admits and alleges that metal detectors
23 are used at the County fair. The County further admits and alleges that the referenced

24 Ordinance speaksfor itself. Except as expresslyadmiued and alleged herein,the County


25 deniesthe allegationsin paragraph51.
26 52. Answeringparagraph 52, the County deniesthe allegations.
27 53. Answeringparagraph 53, the County lacks sufficient information or belief
28 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every allegationin

AMENDED ANSWERTO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT


12061\0002\834222.
I
I paragraph53.
' 2
54. Answering paragraph 54,the County deniesthe allegations.
a
J 55. Answeringparagraph 55, the County admits and allegesthat the Court's
4 "Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for TemporaryRestrainingOrder and Preliminary

5 Injunction" speaksfor itself. The County further admits and allegesthat its Ordinance

6 speaksfor itself. Except as expresslyadmitted and alleged herein, the County deniesthe

7 allegationsin paragraph55.

8 56. Answering parugraph56, the County lacks sufficient information or belief


9 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every allegationin
10 paragraph56.

1l 57. Answering paragraph 57,the County lacks sufficient information or belief


z.= t2 to admit or deny the allegationsand basedthereon,denieseach and every allegation in
o ;
- É
c ô P
É. ã. 13 paragraphíT.
u t 3
t 2¿
2. 9 t4 58. Answering paragraph58, the County admits and allegesthat the California
oIi
.Jt \
15 Constitution, the constitutions of other states,and Ninth Circuit caselaw all speakfor
k E
-== i t6 themselves. Except as expresslyadmitted and allegedherein, the County deniesthe
wta
6 k
É,
< à
vt
77 allegationsin paragraph58.
T z
U 9
18 59. Answering paragraph59, the County admits and allegesthat the United
J,
ry{¿ t9 Statesand California constitutions speakfor themselves. The County lacks sufficient
20 information or belief to admit or deny the remaining allegationsand, basedthereon,

2l denieseach and every remaining allegation inparugraph 59.

22 60. Answeringpara$aph 60, the County admits and allegesthat the California
23 Assault'WeaponsStatuteand other provisions of California law regarding frrearms,as

24 well as Federalfirearms laws, speak for themselves. The County lacks sufficient

25 information or belief to admit or deny the remaining allegations and, basedthereon,

26 denies each and every remaining allegation in paragraph60.


27 61. Answeringparagraph61, the County lacks sufficient information or belief
28 to admit or deny the allegationsin subpart(a) and, basedthereon, denieseach and every

AMENDED ANSWERTO TTIIRDAMENDED COMPLAINT


1206t\0002\834222.r
1 allegation in that subpart. The County denieseach and every remaining allegationin
2 paragraph61.
a
J 62. Answering paragraph62,the Counfy admits and allegesthat its Ordinance
4 speaksfor itself. The County lacks sufficient information or belief to admit or deny the

5 remaining allegationsand, basedthereon, denieseach and every remaining allegationin

6 paragraph62.
1
63. Answering paragraph63, the County lacks sufficient information or belief
8 to admit or deny the allegationsin subpart (a) and, basedthereon, denieseachand every

9 allegation in that subpart. The County denies each and every remaining allegationin

t0 parugraph63.

ll 64. Answering parugraphí4,the County lacks sufficient information or belief


z.= t2 to admit or deny the allegationsin subparts(a), (c), (d) and (e) and, basedthereon,denies
o É
- Í
crr I
N A 13 each and every allegation in those subparts. The County denieseach and every remaining
uJ8
,Ð=
z.= t4 allegation in paragraph 64.
(an =
n
15 65. Answering pamgraph65, the County deniesthe allegations in subpart(c).
k E
-== i t6 The County lacks sufficient information or belief to admit or deny the remaining
<¡t a
o k
É,ø t7
< à allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every remaining allegation in paragraph
T z
( J p
...F'. Q. 1 8 . 65.
, .,u
".2{¿ L9 66. Answeringparugraph6í, the County deniesthe allegations in subpart(k).
20 The County lacks sufficient information or belief to admit or deny the remaining

21 allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every remaining allegation in paragraph

22 66.

23 67. Answeringparagraph6T,theCounty admitsand allegesthat its Ordinance


24 speaksfor itself. The County lacks sufficient information or belief to admit or deny the
25 remaining allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every remaining allegationin

26 paragraphíT.

27 68. Answering paragraph68, the County deniesthe allegations.


28 69. Answering paragraph1g,the County deniesthe allegations.

AMENDED ANSWERTO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT


1206r\0002\834222.r
I 70. Answering paragraph7Ù,the County repeatsand incorporatesby this
2 referenceparagraphs1 through 69, inclusive, of this Answer.
a
J 71. Answeringparagraph7l,the County deniesthe allegations.
4 72. Answering parugtaphT2,the County deniesthe allegations.
5 73. Answering parugraph73,the County deniesthe allegations.
6 74. Answering paragraph74,the County lacks sufficient information or belief
7 to admit or deny the allegationsand, basedthereon,denieseach and every allegationin

8 parugraph74.

9 75. Answering paragraph75,the County deniesthe allegations.

10 76. Answering paragraphTí,the County admits and allegesthat its Ordinance


11 speaksfor itself. Except as expresslyadmitted and allegedherein, the County deniesthe
z.= T2 allegationsin paragraph76.
o =
- É
ø t P
M ¿ 13 77. Answering paragraph77,the County deniesthe allegations.
¡r-¡ 3
t 9 ¿
2.9 14 78. Answering paragraph78, the County deniesthe allegations.
ori
crl E
15 79. Answering paragraph79,the County deniesthe allegations.
k E
-== i t6 80. Answering paragraph80, the County deniesthe allegations.
una
ô k
É.ø t7
< Zà 81. Answering paragraph81, the County admits and allegesthat its Ordinance
T
L
- ,r9
.^i 4. 18 speaksfor itself. Except as expresslyadmitted and alleged herein, the County deniesthe

)tya. 19 allegations in paragraph81.

20 82. Answering paragraph82, the County deniesthe allegations.


2l 83. Answering paragraph83, the County deniesthe allegations.
22 84. Answering pangraph 84, the County deniesthe allegations.
23 85. Answering paragraph85, the County deniesthe allegations.
24 86. Answering paragraph86, the County admits and allegesthat its Ordinance
25 speaksfor itself. The County lacks sufficient information or belief to admit or deny the

26 allegations regardingMr. Heston, Mr. Kerry, and military ceremonies,and basedthereon,

27 deniesthose allegations. The County denieseach and every remaining allegation in


28 paragraph86.

AMENDED ANSWERTO THTRDAMENDED COMPLAINT


12061\0002\834222.r
I 87. Answering para$aph 87, the County repeatsand incorporatesby this
2 referenceparagraphsI through 86, inclusive, of this Answer.
a
J 88. Answering parugraph88, the County admits and allegesthat the laws of
4 jurisdictions outside of Alameda County speakfor themselves. Except as expressly

5 admitted and allegedherein, the County deniesthe allegationsin paragraph88.

6 89. Answering paragraph89, the County deniesthe allegations.


,|
90. Answeringparugraph 90, the County admits and allegesthat the possession
8 of firearms is permitted to occur pursuantto the exceptionslisted in the Ordinance. The

9 County further admits and allegesthat firearms possessionis permitted during the
10 Scottish Gamespursuantto the exceptionslisted in Section 9.12.120(9) of the Ordinance
11 Code of the County. The County specifically deniesthat firearms possessionhas ever
z.= t2 been permitted during Outdoor and Sportsmanshows. Except as expresslyadmitted and
O =
- Í
ø , P
É.¿ t3 alleged herein, the County deniesthe allegationsin paragraph90.
U.J 3
r_7 ¿
- = t4 91. Answering paragraph91, the County admits and allegesthat its Ordinance
L) t4
(/) *
15 speaksfor itself. Except as expresslyadmitted and alleged herein, the County deniesthe
k E
-== i 16 allegationsin paragraph91.
t n 5
Õ k
É . q
< ì l7 92. Answering paragraphgZ,the County admits and allegesthat its Ordinance
T z
L
- , ,- P
ñ/e 18 speaksfor itself. Except as expresslyadmitted and allegedherein, the County deniesthe
't.
,
'.t3.
19 allegations in paragraph92.

20 93. Answering paragraph93,the County deniesthe allegations.


2T 94. Answering paragraph94,the County deniesthe allegations.
22

23 FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE


24 95. The Third Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may
25 be granted.
26 ///

27 ///

28

AMENDEDANSWERTO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT


I 206l \0002\834222.
I
1 SECONDAFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
2 96. The Courtshoulddeclineto exercisesupplemental
jurisdictionoverthe state
a
J law claimssetforth in the Third AmendedComplaint.
4

5 THIRD AFFTRMATIVE DEFENSE


6 97. Plaintifß arebarredfrom obtaininganyrelief by their failureto exhaust
n
I administrativeremedies.
8

9 FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE


10 98. The Court has alreadydeterminedin its Order filed February 14,2005 thatit
tl is improper to name individual defendantsin an official capacitylawsuit such as this one,
z.= t2 and that naming the Board of Supervisorsis sufficient here. DefendantsMary V. King,
o =
- É
C , P
tv &. l3 Gail Steele,Wilma Chan, Keith Carlson and Scott Haggerty, therefore,have been
u-l 3
" = t4 improperly individually namedin that all allegationslie againstthem only in their official
z,=
O :{i
c.¡'¡ E
15 capacities. If, however, plaintifß are intending to sue the individuallynamed defendants
k E
-== i 16 in their personalcapacities,those defendantsare, for the mattersallegedin the Third
un5
â k
É.ø T7
< à Amended Complaint, immune from liability under the doctrine of qualified immunity.
T z
U
- -9
Éâ. 18
t t .
\:2. 19 FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
20 99. Defendantsare informed and believe and thereuponallege that the damages
2I alleged in the Third Amended Complaint, if any there were, were proximately and

22 actually causedby the voluntary actions or omissionsof plaintiffs, and not by any actions
23 or omissionsof the defendants,and plaintifß are therefore barred from recovering money
24 damagesagainstdefendants.
25

26 SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE


27 100. Defendantsareinformedandbelieveandthereuponallegethat the damages
28 allegedin the Third AmendedComplaint,if anytherewere,wereproximatelyand

AMENDED ANSWERTO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT


12061\0002\834222.1
I actually causedby the voluntary actionsor omissionsof third parties, and not by any

2 actions or omissionsof defendants,and plaintiffs are thereforebarred from recovering


a
J money damagesagainst defendants.
4

5 SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE


6 101. Defendantsare informed and believe and thereuponallege that plaintifß'

7 own fault of the fault of third partiesproximately and legally causedand contributed to

8 the damages,if any, thatplaintifß suffered,andplaintifß'recoveryherein, if any, should

9 be reducedproportionately.
10

1t EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE


z.= L2 1,02. Defendantsare informed and believe and thereuponallege that plaintifß
o
- s=
ø ) P
É . & 13 have failed to mitigate their damages,if any, and plaintifß are barred, either wholly or
rr¡ 3
,Ð=
2.2 t4 partially, from recovering damagesfrom defendants.
O r i
útE
15
k E
-== i L6 NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
c n J
â k
É , ø
< zì
T
T7 103. Defendantsareinformedandbelieveandthereuponallegethatplaintifß'
(.J9
n < . 18 claimsarebarredin whole or in partby the doctrineof estoppel.
i 'r-Y¿
¡ 2
t9

20 TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE


2l 104. Defendantsareinformedandbelieveandthereuponallegethatplaintiffs,by
22 their actionsandconduct,havewaivedall claimsagainstdefendants.
23

24 ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE


25 105. Plaintiffs lack standingto assertthe claims in the Third Amended
26 Complaint
27 /t/
28

AMENDED ANSWER TO TT{IRDAMENDED COMPLAINT


t2061\0002\834222.r
1 WHEREFORE, defendantspray that plaintifß take nothing by their Third
2 Amended Complaint, and that defendantsbe awardedtheir costsof suit, including
J reasonableattorney's fees, and such other and further relief as the Court deemsjust and
4 proper.

7 DATED: August12,2005 zuCHARDE. WINNIE


COTINTYCOT.INSEL
8 COUNTYOFALAMEDA
9

(r- i
10 SAYRE
T.P
11
=.= t2
O =
- s
(.,")P PIERCE
fV
-d
13 Attorneys for Defendants,
r-Lr 3
r.9 ¿ MARY V. KING. ET AL.
z.= T4
o #
.J1 4
15
ä E
-== f t6
L O 5
ô k
É . q
< t I7
T Z
L J 9
 ' E 18
b.
7{¿. t9

20

2I

22

23

24

25
26

27

28

AMENDED ANSWERTO TI{IRD AMENDED COMPLAINT


t206t\0002\834222.1
1 PROOF OF SERVICE

2 I, Debbie Nager Reid, declare:


a
J I am aresident of the Stateof California and over the age of eighteenyears,and
not a party to the within action; my businessaddressis Richards, Watson & Gershon,355 S,
4 GrandAvenue,Los Angeles,Califomiag}}Tl-310l. OnAugust 12,2005,I servedthe within
documents:
5
AMENDED,A.NSWER TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
6
7 tr by causing facsimile transmissionof the document(s)listed above from
(213) 626-8484to the person(s)and facsimile number(s) set forth below on this
8 date before 5:00 P.M. This transmissionwas reported as complete and without
error. A copy of the transmissionreport(s), which was properly issuedby the
9 transmitting facsimile machine, is attached. Service by facsimile has been made
pursuantto a prior written agreementbetween the parties.
10
a by placing the document(s)listed above in a sealedenvelopewith postagethereon
11 fully prepaíd, in the United Statesmail at Los Angeles, California, addressedas
set forth below. I am readily familiar with the firm's practice for collection and
12 processingcorrespondencefor mailing with the United StatesPostal Service.
Under that practice, it would be depositedwith the U.S. Postal Service on that
13 sameday with postagethereon fully prepaid in the ordinary courseof business. I
am awarethat on motion of the party served, service is presumedinvalid if postal
L4 cancellation date or postagemeter date is more than one day after date of deposit
for mailing containedin this affidavit.
15
n by placing the document(s)listed above in a sealedFederal Expressenvelopeand
16 affixing a pre-paid FederalExpressair bill, and causing the envelopeto be
delivered to a FederalExpress agent for delivery or depositedin a box or other
17 facility regularly maintainedby Federal Express,in an envelopeor package
designatedby the expressservice carrier, with delivery feespaid or provided for,
18 addressedto the person(s)at the address(es)set forth below.

l9
Donald E.J. Kilmer, Jr. RaymondMacKay,Esq.
20
Law Offices of Donald Kilmer Countyof Alameda
1261 Lincoln Avenue, Suite I I I CountyCounselOffice
2l
San Jose.California 95125-3030 I22l OakStreet,Suite463
22 Oakland,California 94 612-4296

23 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the Stateof California and the
United Statesof America that the above is true and correct.
24
Executedlprn,August12, 2005, at [,os Angeles, California.
25

26

27

28

15989.
I