Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Jeremy Price
Curriculum developed in partnership with Jody Reilly
16 December 2002
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
Introduction
Mr. Collins, my European History teacher in high school, taught by the quote attributed
to George Santayana, “Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” A poor
Irish boy from the Bronx thrust into the role of helicopter gunman during the Vietnam War, Mr.
Collins hung the quote prominently on the wall of his classroom and referred to it often in his
lectures, hoping that his students would remember the tragic mistakes humankind has made in
John Dewey, perhaps the most influential educational thinker of the 20th century,
expressed the notion that education has a social function, and not just an academic function. “A
being connected with other beings,” writes Dewey (1961: 12), “ cannot perform his own
activities without taking the activities of others into account.” In other words, an individual
operates within a social milieu or socially aware environment. Dewey further recognized that an
individual does not operate merely in reaction to those around him or her – the individual
similarly has the power to effect change – nor is the individual’s environment limited by spatial
or temporal proximity: “The things with which a man varies are his genuine environment”
(1961: 11). The role of education in the pursuit of these greater social goals then is to transport
members of all races, ethnicities, and social classes across boundaries closer to one another,
increasing contact with each other, broadening their horizons, and expanding each other’s
With all due respect to Messrs. Collins and Santayana, simply to remember may not be
enough to prime for social and civic change. Remembering is in essence a passive process.
Understanding, on the other hand, “…is the ability to think and act flexibly with what one knows”
(emphasis added; Perkins 1998: 40). Grappling and engaging with the ideas, thinkers, heroes,
-1-
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
and events of history, and actively connecting the past with the present, is an effective way of
learning from history. Through understanding then, and not simply remembering, can students
help build a better world and to bring about a sense that history is nothing if not situated firmly
in the present.
social movements in United States history1 for eighth-grade students, engages students in the
study of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s and follows the Teaching for Understanding
framework (Wiske 1998). As part of a larger unit, students are afforded the opportunity to
analyze the various social movements within their historical and social contexts, and to compare
The Civil Rights Movement in United States history can be an interesting subject of inquiry
for students drawing them in to a deeper and more thorough study, in other words, making this
topic generative. Wiske (1998: 64-5) points to four characteristics of a generative topic:
Accessible and interesting to students: The topics listed above are often of great
identities within a larger social framework. In addition, the 1960’s is an era often
glamorized as a time of great change for the United States in the media through
1
Other topics include the women’s suffrage movement and the labor movement.
-2-
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
Interesting to the teacher: There are teachers who lived through the Civil Rights era,
forging a personal connection to the topic. Some teachers also enter the teaching
profession for altruistic purposes, in order to effect positive social change, making the
contemporary political events and social movements. This allows for building a
While there are many aspects of the Dilemmas in Civil Rights curriculum that are
generative, increasing intrinsic motivation, there aspects of the curriculum that may be
challenging, difficult, and troublesome to the 8th-grade learner. These “targets of difficulty”
include:
Thinking critically about the actions of national heroes: Through the early education
years, heroes of the Civil Rights era, such as Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King, Jr., and
President John F. Kennedy, are often elevated on a pedestal. Getting students to think
critically about the motivations for and ramifications of the actions of these key
past, specifically the events of the Civil Rights era, to the present day, and how the
Civil Rights Movement impacts the personal lives of students, are often difficult
classroom setting. Allowing for exploration, reflection, and scaffolded inquiry are
-3-
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
Critically reading texts: Students of this age (8th grade) are just starting to be
responsible for critically analyzing and assessing the values of written texts. In
few social mechanisms in place to check for accuracy, it is easy to fall prey to the
challenge becomes to move students to analyze both historical primary sources and
Understanding Goals
“When a sailor departs port and loses sight of land, he must have some method of determining
his direction. Early captains relied on nature to provide the answers.” – Mariners’ Museum (1997)
If the use of curriculum is considered a learning journey, the understanding goals can be
considered the cognitive destination. According to Wiske, these goals “state explicitly what
students are expected to come to understand” (Wiske 1998: 66). Understanding goals are
and connecting these same performances with increasingly important state and national standards
This is not to say, however, that there is a direct line between the current understandings
of the class and the understanding goals. When flying on a commercial jet from one city to
another, it is fair to say that one is “off course” 80% of the time on direct flights – the flight crew
continuously adjusts according to a variety of natural and man-made factors to arrive at the
scheduled destination (Porter 1999: 6). In a classroom setting, every student brings his or her
own background, experiences, and opinions to the learning table. This can cause the
2
Pierre Salinger was a press secretary of President Clinton and a former journalist. Salinger became the namesake
of the syndrome describing the widespread tendency to believe anything published on the Internet after he “relayed
a bogus report that he read on the Internet, stating that TWA flight 800, which crashed on July 17, 1996, had been
the victim of friendly fire” (Webopedia 2002).
-4-
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
conversation to cross into unexpected territory. Being mindful of understanding goals allows the
teacher to reach out to these conversations and bring the conversations into the fold of the
In the same vein, John Seely Brown (2000) argues in favor of a “Learning Ecology” – a
constantly evolving interdependent collaboration of diverse learners building upon the ideas of
one another in order to create knowledge. Pedagogy in a learning ecology becomes a matter of
“husbandry” – cultivating the conversation for knowledge building purposes (Brown 2000: 19).
Towards these ends, the understanding goals of the “Dilemmas in Civil Rights” are structured in
a two-part fashion:
Statements of expectations, which explicitly state what the students should come to
understand at the end of the unit. These statements are phrased similarly to standards
and frameworks to allow easy mapping, and are worded in a form familiar to most
teachers.
Questions for inquiry, which allow for in-depth, focused explorations of topics
without a predefined destination. These questions provide the tools for teachers to
cultivate and focus the discussion along thematic lines, but the outcome is not known
skilled teachers lead to deep and complex understandings of topics – this notion, in fact, is
integrated into the definition of “understanding goals” (Wiske 1998: 68) – providing questions
gives teachers a choice. The teachers can decide which structure of understanding goals works
best according to their personal style and the particular needs of the learners. Both paths can
-5-
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
The understanding goals of the Dilemmas in Civil Rights curriculum are as follows:
“…emphasizes understanding as the ability and inclination to use what one knows by operating
in the world” (Wiske 1998: 72). This notion ties in well with the idea that the study of history in
general, and the study of the Civil Rights Movement specifically, can help bring students to
affect positive change in the world around them. The performances presented in the “Dilemmas
in Civil Rights” are geared to allow students to grapple with the ideas, concepts, events, and
contexts of the dilemmas inherent within the Civil Rights Movement in order to construct their
own views and understandings. This will lead, hopefully, to changes in decision-making habits
the Integrated Thinking Model (see figure on right) posited by Complex Thinking
Process
understanding in which the skills necessary to remember and Integrated Thinking Model (adapted from Jonassen 2000: 26).
recall basic and accepted subject domain knowledge (Content/Basic Thinking), the skills
-6-
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
necessary to evaluate, analyze, and connect new knowledge in meaningful ways (Critical
Thinking), and the skills necessary to generate new knowledge and understandings (Creative
“Dilemmas In Civil Rights” are designed to provide a balance between the three different modes
their classrooms.
In addition to being structured around the complex thinking model outlined above, the
framework posited by Mansilla and Gardner (1998). Similar to the above model, these
dimensions of understanding are all equally important, intertwined, and interdependent. The
dimensions of understanding are as follows (from Mansilla & Gardner 1998: 173-8):
Purposes: addresses the ability of students the contexts and consequences of the
Forms: addresses the ways that understanding is performed through various symbol
systems (writing, multimedia, movement, etc.) in order to express what has been
Inherent within the dimensions of understanding are four levels of understanding (naïve,
novice, apprentice, and master) (Mansilla & Gardner 1998: 172). As students move through
-7-
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
higher levels, they demonstrate a greater, or deeper, understanding of the issues through the four
dimensions. The role of curriculum, then, becomes to provide a framework for students and
The assessments of, or rather the feedback for, the performances of understanding for this
curriculum are nearly impossible to disentangle from the performances themselves. Therefore,
they are included in this section rather than reserving a separate section for their delineation. By
definition, assessments within the Teaching for Understanding framework should be ongoing,
contextualized, meaningful, and aligned closely with the understanding goals illustrated at the
outset, allowing students to adjust their course (using the commercial jet flight metaphor from
the Understanding Goals section above) and guiding them to a level deeper understanding
(Wiske 1998: 77). In the “Dilemmas in Civil Rights” curriculum, in order to work toward these
goals, the assessment strategies employed by the teacher are clearly delineated and made public
from the beginning of the unit by encouraging teachers to share the understanding goals with
students, as well as the various assessment tools, such as rubrics (an example of a rubric can be
found in Appendix 2). For one of the culminating performances, the expository essay, students
are encouraged to assess and provide feedback on the work of their peers.
performances with the Complex Thinking and Understanding Domain models, as well as with
-8-
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
Timeline construction: A messing-about and guided inquiry activity (Wiske 1998: 74)
hybrid allowing students to explore the events and conditions that led up to the Civil
Rights Movement.
Dilemma Explorer: Utilizing the Dilemma Explorer online collaborative tool (Price
surrounding the different forms of protest employed by Martin Luther King, Jr., and
Malcolm X.
their inquiry through and stances stemming from the Dilemma Explorer process.
make choices and defend choices…” (Jonassen 2000: 289) regarding the different
styles of protest.
-9-
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
New Technologies
A variety of new technologies are employed in the implementation of the “Dilemmas in
Civil Rights” curriculum. All were carefully selected according to Jonassen’s criteria for
Mindtools (2000: 18-19). In addition, the technologies were selected to be transformative, rather
(McCormick & Scrimshaw 2001). It should also be noted that, procedurally, the technologies,
with the exception of the Dilemma Explorer system, were added late in the curriculum design
process, so that the selection of technologies was kept in-line with the understanding goals and
was tied closely to the performances of understanding, not the other way around. The one
exception, the Dilemma Explorer, is an example of how a technology system can become
transformed when developed concurrently with a curriculum, and, similarly, how a curriculum
The following new technologies were selected for inclusion in the “Dilemmas in Civil
Rights” curriculum:
various multimedia sources (photos, video, sound). While utilizing this easy-to-learn
software, students must decide on the important events and contexts for inclusion in
their timeline.
Dilemma Explorer online collaborative inquiry tool (for more information, see the
http://learnweb.harvard.edu/ent/design_studio/design_studio.cfm?design_id=6672):
This free collaborative tool scaffolds the dilemma inquiry process for students, so that
- 10 -
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
they develop questions, consider various points of view, and incorporate multiple
sources in order to craft their own stance on the dilemma. Students and teachers have
the ability to leave “Sticky Notes” for each other, containing feedback on the process
note-taking process so that students can collect information from various sources as
discrete ideas and then drag-and-drop these ideas into a larger, connected written
document.
While not necessarily fitting the MindTools model nor transformative according to a
strict reading of the sources (Jonassen 2000; McCormick & Scrimshaw 2001), these
are important technologies that allow students to demonstrate their inquiry through
Concluding Thoughts
The process of designing this curriculum in conjunction with my teacher-partner and
fellow classmate, Jody Reilly, has been a wonderful personal learning experience. As someone
who identifies with a more theoretical bent, it was very informative to work so closely with a
teacher with concrete classroom experience and a real interest in the power and events inherent
It is hoped that this curriculum will help students break down the walls of inequality
understandings of, and helping to forge personal connections with, the Civil Rights Movement.
- 11 -
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
It is further hoped that this proactive use of the methods and knowledge domains of a historical
era in order to bring about positive change does Mr. Collins, perhaps the most influential teacher
of my learning career, proud knowing that his mission lives on in the minds of his students.
- 12 -
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
Brainstorming Students are Students are Students are Through a collaborative Through a Students are Students must No formal evaluation,
encouraged to become encouraged to encouraged build a effort, students’ intuitive collaborative effort, encouraged to function within a but the teacher plays
aware of their own identify what they shared understanding beliefs may be students are predict how their group collaborative the important role of
beliefs when referenced regard as important of the Civil Rights transformed. encouraged to collaborative process and must facilitator, keeping the
against “accepted in terms of their Movement. construct new understanding defend their own conversation on track,
knowledge.” innate knowledge, understandings and construction can positions as well as and bringing a wider
and compare that to validate each impact and be reconcile them with breadth of experience
with the knowledge other’s impacted by the positions of to the process.
of their peers. understandings. accepted others.
understandings, and
to take ownership of
their collaborative
efforts.
Timeline Students are Students must Students are A timeline is a type of As a collaborative Students are Students are Timelines will be
encouraged to identify evaluate information encouraged to concept web activity, students encouraged to take encouraged to make presented to the class
the events and contexts and connect pieces synthesize demonstrating an must work together ownership of this use of a timeline, and then publicly
that culminated in the of information with information so that understanding of to build a shared process and to which is an effective displayed in the
Civil Rights Movement each other and to the they can recognize temporally connected understanding and to recognize that these symbolic classroom. Students
based on accepted foundation of the the patterns that led events and contexts. validate existing contexts and events representation of will be evaluated on
understandings. Civil Rights to the Civil Rights knowledge for have led to great temporally their recognition of
Movement. Movement. inclusion in their social change in the connected events key events and
timeline. United States. and contexts. actions, and on the
quality and use of
their research.
- 13 -
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
Dilemma Students are Students must Students are Through the process of Throughout the Students are Students must be Students will be
encouraged to identify evaluate, analyze, encouraged to using the Dilemma process, students are encouraged to able to organize assessed on the
Explorer the core problems and and connect various synthesize source Explorer system, encouraged to become aware of historical connections they draw
issues within the sources of information, and students construct a construct a stances implications their information, events, between events,
dilemmas of the Civil information to then to construct a concept web, which can on the dilemmas, inquiry holds, as and contexts, as well contexts, and points of
Rights Movement and questions and points stance on the initial visually be displayed. and to question and well as to construct a as deliver an oral view, as well as their
develop a stance. of view and to their dilemma. In addition, they have validate sources of personal stance on report based on their articulation of the
stance. the ability to chart how information. the dilemma and to inquiry. issues orally in class
their initial stance consider the possible and the presentation
changes through their implications and of their ideas in a
understanding journey. outcomes of their clear and thoughtful
stance. manner.
Peer See above. See above. See above. See above. See above. See above. In addition to Students will be
organization, assessed on the
Conference3 students are strength by which
encouraged to they demonstrate their
present their inquiry argument through
into the dilemma various media. Do the
utilizing any pieces presented in
medium they feel their “poster” tell a
best represents and story or form a
demonstrates their cohesive argument?
inquiry. Options Are the various stages
include visual of inquiry clear and
diagrams and explicit? Is their
photos, music, position convincing
video, etc. and easily
understood?
Analytical See above. See above. See above. See above. See above. See above. Utilizing a five- Students will pair up
paragraph expository for peer evaluations of
Paper3
3
The Peer Conference and the Analytical Paper are both culminating performances based on the guided inquiry of the process in which students utilize the
Dilemma Explorer online collaborative system. Therefore, most of the connections with the Complex Thinking model and the Dimensions of Understanding are
similar or the same.
- 14 -
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
- 15 -
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
x1 Sentence Writing sometimes contained Writing contained very few, if Writing included vocabulary from the Writing demonstrated thoughtful use
incomplete sentences. any, incomplete sentences. unit. of content vocabulary.
Structure and Writing did not show Writing contained some sentence Writing used transitional words and Writing showed skillful use of
sentence variety. variety. phrases. transitional words and phrases.
Vocabulary Writing used some vocabulary Writing used sentence variety. Writing was clear and concise.
from the unit.
x1 Mechanics Writing contained enough Writing contained some Writing contained few mechanical Writing contained no mechanical
mechanical errors that it was mechanical errors but reader could errors. errors.
difficult to understand the understand content.
content.
x2 Bibliography No Bibliography included Format of Bibliography was Bibliography contained minor format Bibliography had no errors and
incorrect. errors. included all sources in alphabetical
Bibliography did not include all Bibliography included all sources used. order.
sources used.
Total= 98 points
- 16 -
Jeremy Price Dilemmas in Civil Rights Rationale 16 December 2002
Bibliography
Brown, J. S. 2000. Growing Up Digital: How the Web Changes Work, Education, and the Ways
People Learn. Change. March/April 2000, pp. 11-20.
Mansilla, V. B., & Gardner, H. 1998. What Are the Qualities of Understanding? In Wiske, M.
S. (ed.). Teaching for Understanding: Linking Research with Practice (pp. 161-197). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Porter, Bernajean. 1999. Grappling with Accountability: Resource Tools for Organizing and
Assessing Technology for Student Results. Sedalia, CO: Education Technology Planners.
Price, J. 2002. Dilemma Explorer: Initial Report. (Class Assignment for Harvard Graduate
School of Education course T-540 Cognition and the Art of Instruction taught by David
Perkins.) Available from the Dilemmas in Civil Rights design Web site
<http://learnweb.harvard.edu/ent/design_studio/design_studio.cfm?design_id=6672>.
Ritchhart, R., Wiske, M. S., Buchovecky, E., & Hetland, L. How Does Teaching for
Understanding Look in Practice? In Wiske, M. S. (ed.). Teaching for Understanding:
Linking Research with Practice (pp. 122-158). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wiske, M. S. 1998. What Is Teaching for Understanding? In Wiske, M. S. (ed.). Teaching for
Understanding: Linking Research with Practice (pp. 61-86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- 17 -