Roads2HyCom Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Wiki http://www.ika.rwth-aachen.

de/r2h

Hydrogen Pathway: Cost Analysis

Document Tracking ID 5029 Newest revision:

http://www.ika.rwth-aachen.de/r2h/Hydrogen_Pathway:_Cost_Analysis
This revision:

http://www.ika.rwth-aachen.de/r2h/index.php?title=Hydrogen_Pathway:_Cost_Analysis&oldid=5029 Click here to read our disclaimer About Roads2HyCom

Roads2HyCom is a project supported by the European Commission's Framework Six program. Its purpose is to assess and monitor hydrogen and fuel cell technologies for stationary and mobile energy applications.This is done by considering what the technology is capable of, relative to current and future hydrogen infrastructures and energy resources, and the needs of communities that may be early adopters of the technology.By doing this, the project will support the Commission and stakeholders in planning future research activities. Project main website: http://www.roads2hy.com Print date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 03:16:27 +0000

HyLights, Roads2HyCom and the Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Technology Platform (HFP)
The European Commission is supporting the Coordination Action "HyLights" and the Integrated Project "Roads2HyCom" in the field of Hydrogen and Fuel Cells. The two projects support the Commission in the monitoring and coordination of ongoing activities of the HFP, and provide input to the HFP for the planning and preparation of future research and demonstration activities within an integrated EU strategy.

The two projects are complementary and are working in close coordination. HyLights focuses on the preparation of the large scale demonstration for transport applications, while Roads2Hycom focuses on identifying opportunities for research activities relative to the needs of industrial stakeholders and Hydrogen Communities that could contribute to the early adoption of hydrogen as a universal energy vector. Further information on HyLights is available on the project web-site at http://www.hylights.org.

Hydrogen Pathway: Cost Analysis

Contents
1 Introduction 2 Hydrogen Production 2.1 Economics of renewable resources for hydrogen production (biomass and water) 3 Hydrogen Transport 4 Hydrogen Storage 5 Energy Converters 5.1 PEFC 5.2 SOFC 5.3 PAFC 5.4 MCFC 5.5 AFC 5.6 ICE 5.7 Hydrogen Gas Turbine 6 References

Introduction
The International Hydrogen Infrastructure Group (IHIG) requested a comparative economic analysis of different hydrogen pathways for fuel cell vehicles. Thus a cost estimation project was taken up by SFA Pacific, sponsored by the US Department of Energy. SFA Pacific, a California based company which provides evaluation services ([1]), prepared cost modules for different hydrogen pathways. These pathways consist of different options for production, handling, distributing and dispensing hydrogen from central plants and on-site production plants (forecourt plants). The cost module worksheets have provision to enter alternative inputs for assumptions made. For example assumptions like production capacity, carrying capacity, distribution distance etc. can be provided by the user. The investment and operating costs modules are developed based upon commonly accepted cost estimating practices. Capital build-up is based on percentages of battery limit process unit costs. Variable non-fuel and fixed operating and maintenance (O&M) costs are estimated based on percentages of total capital per year. Capital charges are also estimated as percentages of total capital per year assumptions for capital investment. The capital cost estimates are based on U.S. Gulf Coast costs. A location factor adjustment is provided to facilitate the evaluation of costs for three targeted states: high cost urban areas such as New York/New Jersey and California and low-cost lower population density Texas. Two provisions are made at forecourt/fueling stations to allow "what-if" analysis: (1) road tax input accommodates possible government subsidies to jump-start the hydrogen economy and (2) gas station mark-ups permit incentives for lower revenue during

1/11

Hydrogen Pathway: Cost Analysis

initial stages of low hydrogen demand. Table: Capital and Operating costs Assumptions Capital Build-up
General facilities Engineering, Permitting and Startup Contingencies Working capital, Land and othes

% of Process unit
20 15 10 7

Typical range (%)

20-40* 10-20 10-20 5-10

* 20-40% for steam methane reformer and additional 10% for gasification. Operating Costs Build-up
Variable non-fuel operating and maintenance Fixed operating and maintenance Capital Charges

% / year of Capital
1.0 5.0 18.0

Typical Range
0.5-0.5 4-7 20-25 (for refiners) 14-20 (for utilities)

The investment and operating costs are based on SFA?s database and are verified with three gas companies (Air Products, BOC and Praxair) and hydrogen equipment vendors. As an example, comparison of hydrogen costs developed by SFA Pacific and Air Products is shown in table below. Feedstock
Natural Gas Natural Gas Natural Gas Methanol

H2 capacity (t/d)
27 27 2.7 2.7

H2 source
Liquid Pipeline Forecourt Forecourt

Investment ($ million) SFA Pacific

102a 72 6.2 6.0

Hydrogen cost ($/kg) SFA Pacific

4.34 3.08 3.30 3.46

Air Products
63a 82 9.6 6.8

Air Products
3.35 2.91 3.57 3.76

a: The difference between SFA Pacific and Air Products cost can be regarded as large difference in capital investment for fueling station infrastructure.

Hydrogen Production Three main commercial production technologies are considered in the cost analysis: reforming, gasification (partial oxidation) and electrolysis, out of which reforming is the most popular technology. It is observed that the cost of hydrogen production from hydrocarbons (natural gas, gasoline etc.) is less than that from renewable resources (biomass, water etc.). The costs for production of hydrogen and delivery by liquid tanker are given in the following table. Source Cost ($ / kg)

2/11

Hydrogen Pathway: Cost Analysis

Natural gas Coal Biomass Water

Source: SFA Pacific, Inc.

2.21 3.06 3.53 6.17

Economics of renewable resources for hydrogen production (biomass and water)

Biomass is a renewable source of hydrogen. From point of view of large scale hydrogen production it possesses certain limitations. Supply of biomass is a seasonal product. Thus it requires expensive storage facilities. It has high moisture content (except for field dried crop residue). As a result it requires extensive drying before gasification. Limited supplies are available. However, available biomass can be used as a supplement for other solid feedstock and the utilisation of gasification units can be maximised. Water contains hydrogen naturally, but the process of electrolysis used for extraction of hydrogen is expensive compared to the conventional methods of production of H2 from hydrocarbons. The list of feedstock and utility costs used in this analysis is given in table below. Table: Central Hydrogen Production Feedstock and Utility Costs Unit cost ($)
Natural gas (industrial) Electricity (industrial) Electricity (commercial) Biomass (type not specified) Coal Petroleum coke Residue (Pitch) 3.317 / GJ HHV 0.045 /kW 0.070 /kW 62.8 / metric ton 1.043 / GJ dry HHV 0.1896 / GJ dry HHV 1.422 / GJ dry HHV

Source: Annual Energy Outlook 2002 Reference Case Tables, EIA (units converted to SI).

Table: Forecourt (on-site) Hydrogen Production Feedstock and Utility Costs

3/11

Hydrogen Pathway: Cost Analysis

Unit cost ($)

Natural gas (commercial) Electricity (commercial) Methanol Gasoline 5.213 / GJ HHV 0.07 / kW 6.635 / GJ HHV 5.687 / GJ HHV

Source: Annual Energy Outlook 2002 Reference Case Tables, EIA. Current Methanol Price, Methanex, February, 2002 (units converted to SI).

Electrolysis from renewable energy sources Hydrogen can be extracted from water by electrolysis. Although this method is more expensive than the conventional methods, its cost is reducing with the advances in the electrolysis technology. Moreover, hydrogen does not damage the earth by global warming when produced electrochemically, the electricity coming from non-CO2 producing sources such as wind and solar energy. This section presents the analysis of cost of hydrogen produced from these two renewable resources. Method of calculation of cost of hydrogen:

Cost elements involved in hydrogen production by electrolysis using wind and solar energy
1 USD = 0.80 Euro

Various elements are involved in deciding the final cost of a product. The governing elements deciding the cost of hydrogen produced by electrolysis using wind and solar energy are illustrated in the figure. The cost of hydrogen produced by electrolysis depends on two terms; Cost of 1 GJ of H2 = A + B where A is the cost of electricity used to produce a certain unit (1 GJ corresponding to 1 MBTU) of hydrogen. This electricity can be obtained in various ways such as from wind, solar energy etc. The expression for A is given as; A = 2.29Ec

4/11

Hydrogen Pathway: Cost Analysis

where, E is cell potential (in volts) used in an electrolysis unit at a cell current density of 100mA / cm2 and c is the cost of electricity in a large scale manufacturing plant in cents / kWh. B is the aggregate amortization cost of building the plant, its insurance, maintenance and cost of employees. This value (in EUR / GJ of H2) should be recalculated each year since it depends on the value of the currency, inflation etc. For 2006 value of B is calculated as $ 2.84 / MBTU (rounded to $3 i.e. 2.4 EUR / GJ). For high temperature electrolysis value of B is taken as $ 4.49 / MBTU (3.59 EUR / GJ). The cost of H2 transport (more than 1000 miles) is added to the above calculated cost. For the year 2006 this cost is found to be $1.66 (1.34 EUR). Considering 25 % profit, the obtained value is multiplied by 1.25. For high temperature electrolysis, the cost to maintain the system at high temperature is also considered. The difference between the cell potentials at high and room temperature is noted. According to a thumb rule, heat costs about one-third of corresponding electrical cost. Using this rule, one third of the potential difference is added to the cell voltage. Cost of electricity from wind:

Relation between cost of electricity from wind and wind speed upto 8.94 m/s (20 mph) The cost of energy from wind is inversely proportional to v3 up to an average wind speed of 20mph (8.94 m/s). Large number of locations in US have an average wind velocity around 15 mph (6.7 m/s). Cost of electricity produced from wind in September 2006 was 4.5 ? 6 cents / kWh (3.6 - 4.8 euro cents / kWh). Cost of wind energy is decreasing continuously over a period of last twenty years. At the same time value of dollar is also decreasing. Thus the cost of electricity from wind changes with time and location. In addition to the cost of electricity the final cost of hydrogen also depends on the potential and current density of electrolysis. The advances made in electrolysis help in further reducing the cost of hydrogen. The following table shows an estimation for hydrogen prices depending on the temperature of the electrolysis.

Table: Price of hydrogen from wind of 15 mph (6.7 m/s) average as a function of the temperature of electrolysis

5/11

Hydrogen Pathway: Cost Analysis

Temperature and corresponding cell voltage

25 C (1.6 V) 1000 C (1.00 V) 1500 C (0.63 V)

Cost of 1 GJ of H2 + Cost of transmission Cost of H2 having the first in pipe 1600 km + 25% profit law of energy in a US gallon of gasoline
21.14 EUR (26.43 USD) 18.9 EUR (23.63 USD) 14.07 EUR (17.59 USD) 2.48 EUR (3.10 USD) 2.22 EUR (2.78 USD) 1.66 EUR (2.07 USD)

Note: The cost of wind energy used in the table is 4.5 cents / kWh (3.6 euro cents / kWh) Source: John O'M. Bocjris, T. Nejat Veziroglu, Estimates of the price International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 32, Issue 12, August 2007

of hydrogen as a medium for wind and solar sources,

The following table illustrates the effect of the wind velocity on the price of electric energy and thereby the price for hydrogen. Table: Price of hydrogen from wind and with electrolysis at 25 C depending on two wind speeds Available wind speed [mph]
15 (4.5 cents/kWh i.e. 3.6 euro cents / kWh) 20 (1.89 cents/kWh i.e. 1.51 euro cents /kWh)
Note: 1 USD = 0.80 Euro Source: John O'M. Bocjris, T. Nejat Veziroglu, Estimates of the price International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 32, Issue 12, August 2007

Price of 1 GJ of H2
21.14 EUR (26.43 USD) 12.58 EUR (15.73 USD)

Cost of H2 equivalent to 1 gal (3.79 liter) of gasoline

2.48 EUR (3.10 USD) 1.48 EUR (1.85 USD)

of hydrogen as a medium for wind and solar sources,

Cost of solar electricity: From solar energy electricity can be obtained in various ways, two of them being photovoltaic and Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC). For photovoltaic path, the cost of solar energy depends on the efficiency of conversion of solar light to electricity, which is rather low at this stage of development. Additionally, the cost of solar cells is also high. Thus solar energy by photovoltaic is still too expensive than the conventional polluting energies, to be used on a large scale. For OTEC the overall efficiency of conversion of heat to work is much low. But the warm energy available is very large and has low cost. Cost of OTEC is 1/2 to 1/3 times that of photovoltaic solar energy. It is estimated that the PV electricity, used on large scale, will take 15 years (2021) to reach a price of 10 cents / kWh (20 % conversion efficiency). The costs given in the table below are the projected costs of H2 in 2021 based on value of dollar in 2006. The value of dollar is subjected to inflation by 2021. Table: Projected cost of solar hydrogen in 2006$ in 2021 with varying costs of the temperature of electrolysis

6/11

Hydrogen Pathway: Cost Analysis

Cell potential 100 mA cm-2

1.6 V (25 C) 1.0 V (1000 C) 0.63 V (1500 C)

Cost of 1 GJ of H2, Cost of 1 GJ of H2, efficiency = 15%, 13 efficiency = 20%, 10 cents/kWh (10.4 euro cents/kWh (8 euro cents /kWh) cents / kWh)
53.38 EUR (66.73 USD) 42.69 EUR (53.37 USD) 35.37 EUR (44.21 USD) 41.29 EUR (51.62 USD) 33.62 EUR (42.03 USD) 28.13 EUR (35.16 USD)

Cost of H2 = 1 gal (3.79 liter) gasoline equivalent, efficiency = 15%

6.4 EUR (8 USD) 4.8 EUR (6 USD) 4 EUR (5 USD)

Cost of H2 = 1 gal (3.79 liter) gasoline equivalent, efficiency = 20%

4.8 EUR(6 USD) 4 EUR (5 USD) 3.2 EUR (4 USD)

Note: 1USD = 0.80 Euro Source: John O'M. Bocjris, T. Nejat Veziroglu, Estimates of the price International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 32, Issue 12, August 2007

of hydrogen as a medium for wind and solar sources,

Hydrogen Transport This study considers three transport options: cryogenic liquid trucks, compressed H2 tube trailers and pipelines. Cryogenic liquid trucks are the most economical way for transportation since they can carry large amounts of hydrogen and can cover more distance. However, losses due to liquid boil-off are incurred in liquid trucks. Compressed H2 tube trailers are suited for small market demands. The amount of hydrogen that can be carried is limited by the thickness of tube (container). Typical weight ratio of tube-to-hydrogen is around 100-150:1. The cost of delivery is high for tube trailers. Also only 75-85% of load is dispensable. Pipelines are best suited for small distances and for handling large flows. The installation cost of pipelines is much high, $ 0.5 ? 1.5 million / mile. However, their operating cost is relatively small. Following table shows the assumptions made in the study. Table: Road Hydrogen Delivery Assumptions Unit
Load Net delivery Load / unload Boil-off rate Truck utilization rate Truck / Tube Undercarriage kg kg hr/trip % / day % $ / module $

Cryogenic Truck
4000 4000 4 0.3 80 450,000 60,000

Tube Trailer
300 250 20 N/A 80 100,000 60,000

7/11

Hydrogen Pathway: Cost Analysis

Cab
Source: SFA Pacific, Inc.

90,000

90,000

Costs for different modes of transport are given below. It can be seen that cost of cryogenic liquid trucks is 10% of the tube trailers ($0.18 / kg vs $2.09 / kg). Mode of transport
Cryogenic liquid tankers Gas tube trailers Pipelines
Source: SFA Pacific, Inc.

Cost ($ / kg)
0.18 2.09 2.94

Hydrogen Storage Hydrogen can be stored either in liquefied or compressed gaseous form. Liquefaction of hydrogen is a costly option. Compressors and aluminium heat exchanger cold-boxes account for most of the cost. SFA Pacific estimates the total cost for a liquefier as $ 1015 kg/d (estimate from Air Products is $1125 kg/d). Energy consumption by multi stage compression is approximately 10 - 13 kWh / kg of H2. Compressors play a major roll in the capital and operating costs for compressing hydrogen. Multi stage compressors are required to achieve the required pressure of hydrogen. For gaseous hydrogen compression SFA estimated a capital cost of $ 2000 - 3000 / kW and power requirement of 0.5 ? 2 kW / kg / hr. Although liquefaction is costlier than compression, storing H2 in liquid form is inexpensive and more practical than storing H2 in compressed gaseous form. Hydrogen has the lowest energy density and thus more amount of hydrogen is needed to give equal amount of energy as gasoline. For example, to provide energy equivalent to one gallon of gasoline 3.72 gallons of liquid hydrogen and 8 gallons of gaseous hydrogen (pressurised to 400 atm) are required. Thus higher the pressure lower the storage volume and higher the energy stored. However, as the pressure increases the thickness and thus cost of the storage tube increases. At 140 atm the cost of tube is $400 / kg H2 whereas at 540 atm the cost is $ 2100 / kg H2. Following figure shows the dependence of cost of gaseous storage tubes on pressure.

8/11

Hydrogen Pathway: Cost Analysis

Dependence of cost of gaseous H2 storage tubes on pressure

Source: SFA Pacific Inc.

Energy Converters

PEFC Cost for a PEFC system are available from the study: "The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs (2004)". Typical stationary systems with 10 kW and 200 kW respectively are compared. Results are shown in the following table: 10 kW system
Package costs [$/kW] Total installed cost [$/kW] Operating and maintenance cost [$/kWh] 4700 5500 0.033

200 kW system
3120 3800 0.023

A different study called "Mass Production cost of PEM fuel cell by learning curve" from the 29th International Journal of Hydrogen Energy states the cost per unit of energy to be 1522 /kW, whereas an article about the GM HydroGen3 gives a figure of 500 $/kW for a transportation system, and a target value of 50 $/kW.

SOFC Maintenance cost and capital investment for stationary SOFC systems can be found in the study "The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs (2004)", on a basis of a 100 kW system. The values are presented in the following table: 100 kW system

9/11

Hydrogen Pathway: Cost Analysis

Package costs [$/kW] Total installed cost [$/kW] Operating and maintenance cost [$/kWh]

2850 3620 0.024

PAFC The costs for a stationary PAFC system the study "The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs (2004)" base on a 1991 200 kW PAFC system produced by International Fuel Cells, now called UTC. Prices for these units have not decreased, but in fact increased. Due to the lack of cost-competitiveness UTC decided not to manufacture any more units. Nevertheless, costs are shown in the following table: 200 kW system
Package costs [$/kW] Total installed cost [$/kW] Operating and maintenance cost [$/kWh] 4500 5200 0.029

A further source, a report on Natural Gas Fuel Cells from 1995, gives a value of 3000 $/kW for a 200 kW system.

MCFC The cost for a stationary 2000 kW MCFC system can be found in the study "The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs (2004)". 2000 kW system
Package costs [$/kW] Total installed cost [$/kW] Operating and maintenance cost [$/kWh] 2830 3250 0.033

According to the database of the Advanced Power and Energy program of the University of California the costs for a DFC 300A MCFC from Fuel Cell Energy amount to 7700 $/kW for installation, and variable operation and maintenance costs of 0.01 $/kWh.

10/11

Hydrogen Pathway: Cost Analysis

AFC Cost data for Alkaline Fuel Cells have not been collected yet.

ICE Cost for hydrogen fuelled Internal Combustion Engines are not available at the moment.

Hydrogen Gas Turbine The capital investment for a stationary 10.7 MW hydrogen turbine is reported to be 5.8 million Euro. This figure is taken from the 2006 report "Int. J. Nuclear Hydrogen Production and Application".

References
D. Simbeck, E. Chang Hydrogen Supply: Cost Estimate for Hydrogen Pathways - Scoping Analysis NREL/SR-540-32525, November 2002 [2] N. N. The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs (2004) National Academy of Engineering (NAE), Board on Energy and Environmental Systems (BEES), page 32, [3] H. Tsuchiya, O. Kobayashi Mass Production cost of PEM fuel cell by learning curve International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 29, 985 (2004) G. Gigliucci, F. Donatini and M. Schiavetti Int. J. Nuclear Hydrogen Production and Application 1, 26 (2006) J. O'M. Bockris, T.N. Veziroglu Estimates of the price of hydrogen as a medium for wind and solar sources International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 32, Issue 12, August 2007

11/11