Personal or Private?

By WILLIAM SAFIRE

Published: January 2, 2005 n his year-end news conference, President Bush was asked if his relationship with President Vladimir Putin of Russia, who has been undermining democracy, had chilled. Bush replied, ''You know, it's complicated.'' Then he corrected himself: ''It's complex rather than complicated.'' After that surprising display of hairsplitting synonymy, he went on to explain what he meant by complexity: working with the Russians in sharing intelligence on terrorism while implicitly criticizing Putin for his recent centralization of power. Bush liked his choice of the word complex so much that he thrice returned to it moments later when asked about criticism of the Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld: ''The secretary of defense is a complex job. It's complex in times of peace, and it's complex even more so in times of war.'' Simply put, the president rejects complications and is hooked on complexity. Let's examine the difference between those words. Complicated is a participial adjective rooted in the Latin for ''folded together.'' It has always had a slightly sinister connotation: ''There they lie,'' wrote the philosopher Henry Power in 1664, ''all dead, twisted and complicated all together, like a knot of Eels.'' Three years later, the poet John Milton, in ''Paradise Lost,'' wrote of a hellish scene, ''Thick swarming now/With complicated monsters.'' Over the centuries, the word's meaning was rehabilitated somewhat but still retains a primary sense of ''hard to unravel or explain; so intimately intertwined as to be confusing.'' Often it is used as an excuse for an inability to clearly define: to say, ''That's complicated,'' is to duck a question or to cover up ignorance of detail. Although complex, rooted in the Latin for ''encompass or embrace different elements,'' is also the opposite of ''simple,'' it does not seem to brush aside the questioner as one too easily confused. Complex means ''with interconnected parts; compounded of different elements; an intricate combination of ideas.'' Advertisement In grammar, a complex sentence contains one or more subordinate clauses, like the one beginning ''Although,'' which puts the reader to sleep at the beginning of the paragraph that precedes this one. It is the opposite of the simple declarative sentence, like ''complex is usually a compliment.'' (In simplicity there is strength; in complex ity there are nuances running the risk of voter distrust; in complication there is danger of a need for drastic surgery to disentangle those linguistic eels.) PRIVATE VS. PERSONAL In his defense of the secretary of defense, Bush said, ''He has been around in Washington a long period of time.'' This is an example of lazy verbosity; Alistair Cooke used to deride Yanks who said, ''Welcome to the New York area'' or substituted on a daily basis for ''every day'' or Brits who said ''in two weeks' time.'' The president was sharp, however, when it came to getting personal: a reporter asked about his plan for ''private accounts'' among proposed changes to the Social Security system, and Bush began his response with ''As to personal accounts. . . . '' This past summer, at the Republican convention in New York, the former House majority leader Richard Armey took me aside at a fat-cat function and whispered, ''Personal is the word, not private.'' Sure enough, in all Republican presentations of elements of the future ''ownership society,'' the warm, almost cuddly word personal -- as in ''up close and personal,'' a phrase used in The Times in 1915 to describe the closeness of the Rev. Selden Delaney with his parishioners, later popularized as the title of a 1996 movie starring Michelle Pfeiffer and Robert Redford -- is the term used to escape from private, a word that is the antithesis of public and is seen to offend most blue-state citizens. (That's a complicated sentence that wishes it were merely complex.) The private/personal synonyms have much in common with the complicated/complex pair. In both cases, the pair shares an antonym -- ''public'' for the former, ''simple'' for the latter -- and within each pair is a subtle separation by connotation. Private is from the Latin privatus, ''apart from the state,'' its meaning extended to ''belonging to the individual or interest and not owned by any government.'' As a noun, privacy has a good connotation (keep out of my computer, you prying cookie). As an adjective, however, private is often associated in political discourse with ''the truly greedy,'' as in ''private developers.'' Consequently, liberals deride the idea of

setting aside a portion of the payroll tax destined for Social Security as the dreaded privatization, while conservatives like to call that percentage set aside a ''personal retirement account.'' Personal probably comes from the Etruscan phersu, ''mask,'' from which we get persona, an assumed character or ''image.'' With the rise of interest in the person, individual or self, personal took on an intimate character: we enjoy e-mail's personal correspondence on our personal digital assistants and grunt happily if wearily at the behest of our personal trainers. In a word, personal is in; impersonal can be an insult, and private -- especially in its verb form as privatize -- has more enemies in the media than friends. DEAR NEAR ''You have ruled out tax cuts,'' a reporter said to the president, ''and no cuts in benefits for the retired and the near retired.'' Then came the semantic zinger: ''What, in your mind, is 'near retired'?'' Bush half-answered that with a reference to ''our seniors,'' but let me deal with the dropping of the adverbial -ly and the overuse of near as a combining form. It became controversial with near miss, a nonsensical version of near thing; some of us patiently but uselessly pointed out that the writer meant ''near hit.'' Near miss has since entrenched itself as an idiom. (Idioms is idioms, and I could care less.) The abovementioned Vlad the Impaler refers to Russian speakers in the nations that broke away from the Soviet Union as the near abroad. And now we have Bush's near retired, presumably but not decidedly people approaching their 60's. Two paragraphs back, today's column was near finished. The compound nouns are chasing the adverbs out of the language.