OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

Oregon School District - Middle School -

Goal Report - Appendix 2008-09
Oregon School
TABLE OF CONTENTS District Mission

Page Contents Page Contents “..helping students

acquire the skills,
2 Reading Longitudinal MAP/WKCE Grades 7/8 13 Social Studies Longitudinal MAP/WKCE Grades 7/8 knowledge and
attitudes needed to
3 MAP Reading Growth Index Graphs 2006-current 14 Outcomes
achieve their
4 7th Grade MAP & WKCE Reading Demographics 2006-current 15 Refocus Room Data individual
potential..”
5 8th Grade MAP & WKCE Reading Demographics 2006-current 19 Detention Data

6 Language Arts Longitudinal MAP/WKCE Grades 7/8 25 In-School Suspensions

7 Math Longitudinal MAP/WKCE Grades 7/8 28 Out-of-School Suspensions

8 MAP Math Growth Index Graphs 2006-current 25 ISS/OSS Comparison and Combined Data

9 7th Grade MAP Math & WKCE Demographics 2006-current 31 % Breakdown repeat offenders ISS

10 8th Grade MAP Math & WKCE Demographics 2006-current 32 % Breakdown repeat offenders OSS

11 Tier 3 Math Narrative written by OMS Math Teachers Spr 09

12 Science Longitudinal MAP/WKCE Grades 7/8

OREGON MIDDLE SCHOOL STAFF BELIEF STATEMENTS

We believe students will develop respect for their community, environment, and themselves.
We believe all staff, students, and community will foster a positive attitude and outlook.
We believe all staff, students and community will be respectful and responsible.
We believe all staff will model life-long learning and engage students in high levels of academic excellence.

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 1

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Reading

Ethnicity Students with English F/R Lunch literacy Gifted and Overall
Disabilities Language skills Talented
Learners
White/ Other Students Students ELL Non- F/R Non- R+ Non- G/T Non- overall
non- Combined w/Dis. w/o Dis. ELL F/R R+ G/T
Hispanic Groups
7th
MAP S'09 85 71 49 90 33 84 54 86 50 86 100 76 83
MAP S' 08 80 80 52 84 50 80 56 81 44 83 100 76 80
MAP S' '07 76 38 39 79 0 74 44 76 74
WKCE 08-09 84 69 39 90 50 83 46 86 38 87 100 74 82
WKCE 07-08 83 60 29 91 50 82 67 75 38 84 100 78 82
WKCE 06-07 88 33 51 93 33 88 88
WKCE 05-06 90 75 71 93 0 90 89
8th

MAP S'09 84 67 54 87 50 84 56 85 62 86 98 77 82
MAP S' 08 86 47 40 86 0 81 56 82 50 82 100 77 80
MAP S' '07 78 57 44 85 100 78 77
WKCE 08-09 85 59 26 92 50 83 45 88 75 84 100 78 83
WKCE 07-08 82 40 31 85 33 80 45 81 37 82 100 77 80
WKCE 06-07 84 56 61 88 100 83 83
WKCE 05-06 90 75 52 95 90

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 2

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Reading MAP Growth Target Graphs

1"'23(0#2345(67#8"49(
(!"

'!"

&!"

!"#$"%&'"(
%!"
,-./"
$!"
,/./"
#!"

!"
$!!)" $!!*" $!!+"
)*!(+,*-./0(

*1(2#(*324"(0#2516(78#9"1:(
Our overall goal is to see a decrease in the top graph
which would indicate a continual decline in the (!"
amount of students not proficient or meeting their '!"
growth targets.
&!"
!"#$"%&'"(
The graph to the right should be the opposite of the
graph above and demonstrate a continual climb to %!"
,-.-"
show that our students are continually exceeding $!"
proficiency and or their growth targets. ,/.-"
#!"

!"
$!!)" $!!*" $!!+"
)*!(+,*-./0(

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 3

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Reading MAP and WKCE Grade 7

Longitudinal Graphs representing MAP and WKCE !"#$%&'()$*+,-$.)'(/01$

scores in the various demographic groups. #!!"
,123456760
829:;62<"

+!" =314>".7?@264A"
!"#$%&'()$*+,$-)'(./0$ B>7C:9"
#!!" D3CA4639"E5F29G"
1234567879:3;<=73>"
*!"

+!" ?425@"A8BC375D" D3CA4639"E57"F29G"

E@8F<;"
)!"
/4FD574;"G6H3;I"
*!" /HH"

/4FD574;"G68"H3;I"
(!" I760/HH"
)!"
JKK"

'!" J5K""
(!" L879JKK"

I760J5K"
M6N""
'!" &!"

L879M6N" KL"
&!"
%!"
NO" I760KL"
%!"
L879NO"
$!" B5M"

$!" E6P"
I760B5M"
#!"
L879E6P"
#!"
7N4>;OO"
8Q5@=RR"
!"
!"
,-./" ,-./" ,-./" ,-./"
,-."/0"0!)" ,-."/0"!*" ,-."/0!+" !'0!(" !(0!)" !)0!*" !*0!+"

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 4

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Reading MAP and WKCE Grade 8

Longitudinal Graphs representing MAP and WKCE
scores in the various demographic groups.
!"#$%&'()$*+,-$.)'(/01$
!"#$%&'()$*+,$-)'(./0$
)"# *01234565/
)""#
7189:51;#
/012345657819:;51<#
<203=#,6>?153@#
A=6B98#
=203>#?6@A153B# ("#
C>6D:9# C2B@3528#D4E18F#
("#
-2DB3529#E4F19G#
C2B@3528#D46#E18F#
-2DB3529#E46#F19G# '"#
-GG#
'"#
HII#
H65/-GG#
&"#
J657HII#
I4J##
&"# K4L##
""# H65/I4J#
J657K4L#
JK#
%"# LM#
%"#
H65/JK#
J657LM#
A4L#
$"# C4N# $"#
H65/A4L#
J657C4N#
6M3=:NN#
!"#
!"# 6O3>;PP#
*+,-# *+,-# *+,-# *+,-#
*+,#-.#."&# *+,#-.#"'# *+,#-."(# ."/.&# .&/.'# .'/.(# .(/.)#

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 5

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Language Arts

Grade Level Ethnicity Students with English F/R Lunch Literacy Gifted and Overall
Disabilities Language Skills Talented
Learners
White/ Other Students Students ELL Non- F/R Non- R+ Non- G/T Non- overall
non- Combined w/Dis. w/o Dis. ELL F/R R+ G/T
Hispanic Groups
7th
Outcome 09 73/83/96
Outcome 08 80
MAP S'09 86 67 60 90 100 86 52 89 58 88 100 79 86
MAP S' '08 87 85 73 89 75 87 56 88 67 88 98 84 86
MAP S' '07 88 54 58 90 50 86 53 88 86
8th
Outcome 09 28/75/86
Outcome 08 69
MAP S'09 84 71 44 89 75 85 68 88 68 86 98 78 83
MAP S' '08 91 67 45 95 50 89 52 90 61 91 100 87 89
MAP S' '07 91 60 45 95 50 89 63 90 89
WKCE 08-09 80 53 26 87 50 79 42 84 64 81 98 73 79
WKCE 07-08 82 42 28 80 60 74 37 76 26 77 95 70 74

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 6

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Math

Grade Level Ethnicity Students with English F/R Lunch Literacy Gifted and Overall
Disabilities Language Skills Talented
Learners
White / Other Students Students ELL Non- F/R Non- R+ Non- G/T Non- overall
non- Combined w/Dis. w/o Dis. ELL F/R R+ G/T
Hispanic Groups
7th
Outcome 09 98
Outcome 08 64
MAP S'09 85 71 47 90 33 84 54 86 50 86 97 77 83
MAP S' '08 78 62 57 80 75 77 89 77 56 79 95 74 77
MAP S' '07 82 46 46 85 50 79 53 81 80
WKCE 08-09 83 66 43 88 75 81 57 84 38 85 99 73 81
WKCE 07-08 77 47 35 82 25 76 67 76 44 77 95 72 75
70
WKCE 06-07 82 50 50 86 67 81 81
68
WKCE 05-06 80 50 49 86 0 80 79
8th
Outcome 09 95
Outcome 08 84
MAP S'09 82 53 46 86 25 82 59 83 25 83 97 74 79
MAP S' '08 83 44 38 86 40 81 67 81 47 83 100 78 81
MAP S' '07 87 33 60 90 85
WKCE 08-09 83 47 34 88 25 81 58 84 69 82 98 75 81
WKCE 07-08 81 45 83 86 67 79 55 80 47 81 95 76 79
WKCE 06-07 80 22Oregon School
51District - Middle
84 School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 7 78
WKCE 05-06 85 92 42 91 86
 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Math MAP Growth Target Graphs

-"'./(0#./12(+3#4"15(
'#"
'!"
&#"
&!"

!"#$"%&'"(
%#"
%!" +,-."
$#"
+.-."
$!"
#"
!"
%!!(" %!!)" %!!*"
)*!()*+,(

Our overall goal is to see a decrease in

the top graph which would indicate a *-(.#(*/.0"(1#.2-3(+4#5"-6(
continual decline in the amount of
(!"
students not proficient or meeting their
growth targets. '!"

The graph to the right should be the &!"

!"#$"%&'"(

opposite of the graph above and

%!"
demonstrate a continual climb to show ,-.-"
that our students are continually $!"
exceeding proficiency and or their ,/.-"
growth targets. #!"

!"
$!!)" $!!*" $!!+"
)*!(()*+,(

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 8

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Math MAP and WKCE Grade 7

Longitudinal Graphs representing MAP and WKCE

scores in the various demographic groups. !"#$%&'()$*+,-$$
'#!" (01234565-7189:51;"

<203="*6>?153@"
!"#$%&'()$*+&,-.$/01$/'"#$ A=6B98"
)*!" '!!" C2B@3528"D4E18F"
012345676892:;<62="
C2B@3528"D46"E18F"
>314?"@7AB264C"
(!" D?7E;:"
+GG"
&!"
.3EC463:"F5G2:H"
H65-+GG"
.3EC463:"F57"G2:H"
'!"
I4J""
IJJ" %!"

H65-I4J"
&!" K768IJJ"
JK"
L5M"" $!"

%!" H65-JK"
K768L5M"
A4L"
MN"
#!"
$!" H65-A4L"
K768MN"
6M3=:NN"
D5O"
#!" !"
()*+" ()*+" ()*+" ()*+"
K768D5O"
!,-!%" !%-!." !.-!&" !&-!/"

!!" 7P4?<QQ"
+,-"./"/*&" +,-"./"/*'" +,-"./*("
Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 9
 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Reading MAP and WKCE Grade 8

Longitudinal Graphs representing MAP and WKCE

scores in the various demographic groups. !"#$%&'()$*+,-$.'"#$
++"#
,123456760829:;62<#

!"#$%&'()$*+,$*'"#$ +""#
=314>#.7?@264A#
B>7C:9#
+""#
1234567879:3;<=73># D3CA4639#E5F29G#
*"#

?425@#A8BC375D# D3CA4639#E57#F29G#
*"# E@8F<;# )"#
/4FD574;#G6H3;I# /HH#

)"# /4FD574;#G68#H3;I# ("# I760/HH#

JKK# J5K##
'"#
("#
L879JKK# I760J5K#

&"#
M6N## KL#
'"#

L879M6N# %"# I760KL#

&"# B5M#
NO#
$"#
L879NO# I760B5M#
%"#
!"# 7N4>;OO#
E6P#
,-./# ,-./# ,-./# ,-./#
"&0"'# "'0"(# "(0")# ")0"*#
$"# L879E6P#

8Q5@=RR#

!"#
,-.#/0#0"(# ,-.#/0#0")# ,-.#/0"*#

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 10

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Reading MAP and WKCE Grade 8

Tier 3 Narrative from Math Data Team Meeting Spring
of 2009

Positives Summary
• 7th grade advanced level has increased almost 20% for
WKCE almost doubled from 207 to 2008!
• Basic Decreased by 7% for WKCE at 7th grade
• 8th grade advanced increased by 5%
• 7th and 8th grade P and A on WKCE were between 83%
and 85% of the population
• Constructed responses for 7th grade – most had top scores
• MAP most kids are above grade level of 224 for fall testing
• 21 kids in top 20-25 of Explore Test
• WKCE basic and minimal are decreasing over time!
• 7th and 8th grade scores for Advances and Proficient were
above the state average and Minimal and Basic were below
the state average
• 3,4,5 WKCE have a basic and minimal of less than 10%
• 4th and 5th grade WKCE advanced was over 60%
Low-Lights Summary
• EXPLORE a lot of kids in the middle – need more
advancing to higher ranges
• MAP two grade bands below are FULL (80 – 100 kids in
ranges 201-210 and 211-220)
• MAP growth index is less than 50% of kids (45.7%)
• WKCE minority students did not score as well as white
students, same for males with the exception of statistics
and probability
• EXPLORE kids who said needed math help had lower
composite scores
• EXPLORE highest score range – probability is part of
that along with rates and graphing linear equations,
slopes of lines, area, perimeter, and volume are all taught
in 7th grade so hopefully, more students will know and
remember for next year. Other things in this range are
mirror images, translations and rotations, reflections –
not taught until later in 8th grade so will be a gap
• 7th grade WKCE geometry section was below grade
level seems like low spot but just in constructed response
items
Where to Go From Here
• Areas where 8th graders are struggling right now….small
number don’t show their work
• Gains in program need a few more years to see big gains.
• A few questions on each review that are multiple choice
• At least one question on each test is multiple choice
• Suggest goal setting for MAP testing
•

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 11

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Science

Grade Level Ethnicity Students with English F/R Lunch Literacy Gifted and Overall
Disabilities Language Skills Talented
Learners
White/ Other Students Students ELL Non- F/R Non- R+ Non- G/T Non- Gen Concepts Both
non- Combined w/Dis. w/o Dis. ELL F/R R+ G/T Science
Hispanic Groups
7th
Outcome 2009 79
Outcomes 2008 78
MAP S'09 92 89 74 95 100 92 78 94 69 94 98 89 91 93 92
MAP S' '08 77 58 67 79 50 77 78 77 47 79 99 72 85 69 77
8th
Outcomes 2009 96
Outcomes 2008 76
MAP S'09 89 66 62 92 63 89 67 89 80 88 99 83 86 87 87
MAP S' '08 79 42 44 81 33 77 48 78 32 80 100 72 81 71 76
WKCE 08-09 80 59 31 88 75 80 55 84 61 83 100 74 80
WKCE 07-08 87 50 61 89 50 87 58 88 63 86 100 84 86
WKCE 06-07 88 100 72 91 88 88
WKCE 05-06 89 75 61 92 89 89

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 12

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Social Studies

Grade Level Ethnicity Students with English F/R Lunch Literacy Gifted and Overall
Disabilities Language Skills Talented
Learners
White/ Other Students Students ELL Non- F/R Non- R+ Non- G/T Non- overall
non- Combined w/Dis. w/o Dis. ELL F/R R+ G/T
Hispanic Groups
7th
Outcomes 09 70
Outcomes 08 43
8th
Outcomes 09 67
Outcomes 08 78
WKCE 08-09 80 41 26 86 50 78 45 83 64 80 98 72 78
WKCE 07-08 78 53 27 83 80 76 47 79 32 78 95 74 77
70
WKCE 06-07 89 56 67 92 88
68
WKCE 05-06 90 75 57 93 89

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 13

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Outcome Data

Local Curriculum
Outcome Results
% of students with all 4’s
or 5’s on outcomes per Language Arts Math Science Social Studies
subject area.
07-08 08-09 07-08 08-09 07-08 08-09 07-08 08-09
5th Grade 54% N/A 49% 60%
6th Grade 38% 29% 39% 44%

7th Grade 80% 79%/83%96% 69% 98% 81% 79% 51% 70%
8th Grade 63% 28%/75%/86% 82% 95% 84% 96% 78% 67%

LANGUAGE ARTS: There was some confusion this past spring on scoring outcomes. Some teachers used 1-4 some 1-5. The numbers from left to right
represent percentages of 4s5s, 3s4s and 3s4s5s.
MATH: With the implementation of the new math series at OMS in 2007-2008 we only used outcomes with students taking algebra for grades 7 and 8
SCIENCE: 8th grade used 3s4s, 7th grade used 4s5s, if you counted 3s4s5s for 7th grade the percentage would be 95%
SOCIAL STUDIES: Represents the percentage of 4s5s, if you use just 3s4s it would be 62%, 3s4s5s 93%

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 14

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student Refocus Room Referrals

Comparison of the last two years refocus room referrals.

A logarithmic trend line was used to demonstrate and compare the two years.
Both years there is a gradual increase in referrals throughout the year.

Refocus Room Referrals

160
R² = 0.6889 2007-08 2008-09 139 141
R² = 0.7474 146
130

98 116
100
82 96 85
73
65 63 84
70
Our Academic and Behavior
65 64
42 60 Data support the Overall
40 growth in positive survey
41 results of the Parents and
Student Surveys
25
10
Sep’08 Oct’08 Nov’08 Dec’08 Jan’09 Feb’09 Mar’09 Apr’09 May’09

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 15

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Refocus Teacher Referrals

0708 0809
15

13
11.25
This bar chart is a comparison of
12
referrals by teachers for the
refocus room from 0708 to 0809

The Bars represent the number of 7.5

staff making the referrals.
8 8
The numbers underneath 7
represent the ranges of referrals.
3.75
Substitutes referred:
169 in 0708 and 123 in 0809 4 4 4 4
Office/Administration referred: 3 3
0
26 in 0708 and 72 in 0809 2 2
1 1 1 1 1
1 2-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 31-35 35-40 41-45

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 16

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Refocus Student Referrals by Teams

500
0708
0809
375

250
288
200 495
This PIE Chart Represents the 118 275
number of students referred from 140 125
each team from the overall count. 222 151

This includes total use of refocus 7O

room for all categories 7M 0
8O
8M

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 17

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student Refocus Data

Refocus
0 37.5 75 112.5 150
Citizenship 75
Attitude 52
We started using the
refocus room as more Responsibility
of an overall 96
intervention room this Excellence 4
past year. As you can
see we used it for AdminAssign
Behavior Plans, 127
Testing and teachers LunchDET
61
would send students SelfSelect
their to work on
projects if they needed BIP 105
a quiet focused area 60
Administratively Testing 9
Assigned is used for
students who were in WorkTeacher 23
an alternative
classroom placement
and or working on
independent projects.
Self-Select was used to return to class (otherwise some students tried to take advantage of this room to
by any student who felt miss class)
they needed to cool You will also notice that the CARE criteria are used as we did with detentions.
down. The student was However, it doesn’t always give us the details we would like in an easy manner. The
given a 5 minute time PBIS team will need to think if they wish to continue that or not.
to refocus then needed

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 18

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student Detention Data

When you compare the number of detentions in 2008-2009 to Percentages are based on total school population
the previous year of 2007-2008 you see a significant reduction.
In 2007-2008 we had a Homework Lunch Intervention which
ALL Diff SPED Diff REG Diff
we ran through the 3rd quarter. To discourage skipping this 83 32 59
intervention we issued detentions. The top line includes HWL Total 242 (14.9%) 59 (5.8%) 183 (9.2%)
detentions for a total of 1009. The middle line is without HWL Male 174 52 23 18 137 34
Female 68 31 37 14 44 17
2008-09 0708-HW 2007-2008
Detention Referrals 2007-200 2008-20 % Decrease 7th Diff SPED Diff REG Diff
8 09 14 22
200 Total 71 36 (6.5%) 20 (2.5%) 51 (3.9%)
1009 (w/ 242 76%
HWL) Male 44 24 15 9 29 15
R² = 0.0189
Female 27 12 5 5 22 7
573 242 58%
150 (w/o
R² = 0.1869 HWL)
8TH Diff SPED Diff REG Diff
66 16 50
Total 165 (11.9%) 38 (2.8%) 127 (9.0%)
100 Male 127 50 22 9 105 41
Female 38 16 16 7 22 9
86
78 79 44
50 40 68
33 32 30 60
23 49 55 21 detentions for a total of 573. In 2008-2009
12 48
5 we didn’t run the HWL. The table below
27 shows a significant drop either way.
0 As you can see there was a significant
Sep’08 Oct’08 Nov’08 Dec’08 Jan’09 Feb’09 Mar’09 Apr’09 May’09 decrease in detentions. I believe this is in
part in teachers finding more ways to deal
Reduction in Detentions 0708 by 58% (if with behaviors as well as an increase in
Refocus Room use
you include HW Lunch 76%)

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 19

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student Detention Data

Detention Reasons
0 25 50 75
100
Citizenship
Our Academic and Behavior
Data support the Overall
Attitude growth in positive survey
results of the Parents and
Responsibility Student Surveys

% of Detentions Excellence
% population
77
80 100
Ethnicity Analysis:
• 3.8% of our population is Black, however, they comprise 16%
80 75 90
of our detentions
60 • 3.4% of our population is Hispanic, however, they represent 75
7% of our detentions
• 90.1% of our population is White, however, they represent 77% 60 67.5
of detentions
40 • As you can see their is disparity among the different subgroups 50
90.4 40 35 45
we need to work within the PBIS committee and try to identify 87.7
why we have this disproportionality among our population.

20 16 25 20 22.5
7
12.3
0 0 0
0 3.4 3.8 3 0 EconDis NonEconDis
White Hispanic Black Indian % suspension
% pop

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 20

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student Detention Data

This graph represents the number of teachers that referred in

the established ranges
63% of the OMS Staff including SUB and EAs made detention
referrals 15
The numbers on the bars represent the number of staff making
the detention referral
Teacher Referrals The numbers on the bottom represent the number of detentions
given
12

11 13
6

9
3

1
2-5
6-10 2 0
11-15 2
15-20

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 21

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student Detention Data

0708
0708-HWL 400
0809
This chart is the 0708 to 0809
team comparison for 320
detentions. The numbers on
the bar represent the number
of students from that team.
The Team identification is on
240
the bottom.
227
The Red Bar (highest
numbers) represents 372
Detentions including 160
Homework Lunch during 0708
169 322 183
The Green Bars represent
Detentions without
84
Homework Lunch for each 137 72 80
team 42
The Yellow Bars represent 7O 68 97
0809 detentions nothing 29
excluded 7M 0
8O
8M

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 22

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student Detention Data

8 DT
6 DT 2%
3%

1 DT 2 DT
3 DT 4 DT
5 DT 6 DT 5 DT 7 DT
7 DT 8 DT 7% 2%
9 DT 9 DT
4 DT 1%
6%
This pie chart represents a percentage breakdown
of the 104 (18.7% of school enrollment) students 3 DT
who received detentions last year; based on the
number of detentions they received.
13%
Of the 18.7 % of our student population: 1 DT
9.5% (53) students only received 1 detention 51%
5.4% (30) received 2-3 detentions
2.3% (13) received 4-5 detentions 2 DT
.09% (5) received 6-7 detentions 16%
.05% (3) received 8-9 detentions

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 23

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student Detention Data

% Detentions
% population

90 90

79
This bar graph represents the proportionality of
Economic Status as it relates to the percentage of
detentions. 67.5 67.5
12.3% of our population is considered Free and
Reduced and received 21% (52 of the 242
detentions)

87.7% of our population is not Free and Reduced

45 87.7 45
and received 79% (190 of the 242 detentions)

21
22.5 22.5

12.3
0 0
EconDis NonEconDis

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 24

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student In-School Suspension

0809 % ISS % of Population
0 37.5 75 112.5 150

ISS 146

Female 26
53.2 2007-08 2008-09
Male 73.9
46.7 # of ISS 196 146
SPED 38.3
13.7 # of Periods n/a 920
REG 58.9
62.7 # of Days (8pd) n/a 115
Grade 7 11.7
52.3
Grade 8 88.3 Reduction in ISS by 26% this is also a
47.7 significant decrease
100

There was a 26% decrease in ISS from the 0708 to the 0809 school year.
You will notice with the graph on the left that we have a disproportionate
75 number of African American students receiving ISS compared to the % in
60 our population.
% of ISS Also there is almost a three fold difference in the amount of males receiving
% population ISS versus females
50 We also have disparity as it pertains to special education; they make up
90.4 13.7% of the population yet received 38% of ISS.

25 16.4
The graphs to the left represents the
number of Percentage of Ethnicity
0.006 0.13 0.006 (yellow) and the percentage of ISS
0 3.8 3.4 0.1 1.8 received by that population (orange)
White Black Hispanic Indian AsianPacificIslander

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 25

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student In-School Suspensions

63 different students were given ISS

0809 students last year for a total of 146 ISS
Number of Students this makes up 11% of the overall student
population

Only 71 different students were

30 given ISS or OSS last year
This is 13% of our student
population.
483 students or 87% were able to 24
comply with school rules and not 22
22.5 receive a suspension 21
20

15 19
18 18
15
12
14 11
12 9
8
7.5 9
5 8 8
7
5 Our Academic and Behavior Data support the Overall growth in positive survey
results of the Parents and Student Surveys
0
Sep’08 Oct’08 Nov’08 Dec’08 Jan’09 Feb’09 Mar’09 Apr’09 May’09 June’09

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 26

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student Out-of-School Suspensions

% OSS % Population
0 20 40 60 80

OSS 73
Female 30
53.2
Male 70
46.7
SPED 13.7 44
REG 56
62.7
Grade 7 49
52.3 2007-08 2008-09
69.8 Grade 8 51
70 47.7 100 # of OSS 96 73

# of Periods n/a 2313

56 # of Days (8pd) n/a 289.3
75

We had a reduction in OSS from 0708 to 0809.

42 However there is still some disproportionality when you
break down the data.
50 Especially with our African American population we have
90.4 quite a disparity.
28
20.5 The other large disparity is with our special education
% suspensions population. They make up 13.7% of the population yet
% of Population received 44% of the OSS.
25
14 There is some disparity with regard to gender, however, that
is not atypical of middle school. It may however, indicate a
4.1 4.1 lack of engagement with our male students.
1.3
It is interesting to see that we were pretty evenly split
0 3.8 3.4 0.1 1.8 0 between 7th and 8th grade.
White Black Hispanic Indian AsianPacificIslander

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 27

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student Out-of-School Suspensions

0809 36 different students were given OSS

0809 # students students last year for a total of 73 OSS
this makes up 6.5% of the overall student
population
15 14
Only 71 different students were given
ISS or OSS last year
This is 13% of our student population.
12 483 students or 87% were able to
comply with school rules and not
receive a suspension 12
9
9 8
7 7 9
8 6 6
6 5 5
6 6 4
5 5 5
3 4
3

0
Sep’08 Oct’08 Nov’08 Dec’08 Jan’09 Feb’09 Mar’09 Apr’09 May’09 June’09

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 28

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

OMS Tier 1 Data Student Suspensions Reasons Comparison

ISS OSS

The OMS PBIS team will need to find ways

to further break down “Insubordination” 90
and “Non-Compliance” these are catch all
82 terms and to address these issues we need
to find a way to further track behaviors so
that we can be more proactive and teach the
replacement behaviors we would like kids to 67.5
demonstrate.

45

22.5
19
30 6 8
Aggressive Behavior 3 42 9
Fighting
1 Insubordination 3
Theft 24 6 12 0
AODA 6 6
Non-Compliance
Sexual Harassment 33
Dishonesty
1 Harassment

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 29

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

This OSS/ISS Chart breaks down all

the suspensions in to three groups
students who had ISS and OSS and
students who only received ISS or
OSS

OSS
5.6%

ISS and OSS

ISS
ISS 45.1% ISS and OSS Of the 71 (13%) students that
received suspensions
OSS 49.3% ISS and OSS (6.1%) 35
ISS Only 5.8% 32
OSS only .07% 4

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 30

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

Suspensions - In School 0809

ISS Students Suspensions

Of the 1
4
received 6 ISS 11% (63)
ISS. Her of the st
on overa e u
ll studen is the breakdow dents
5.6% (31 t popula n based
) t
ISS 3.7% (21 received only 1 ion.
)
1.3% (7 received 2-3 IS 40
) S
.3% (2) received 4-5 ISS
31 .3% (2)
Received
Received 6-7
10-11
30
Our Academic and
Behavior Data support
21
the Overall growth in
positive survey results 20
of the Parents and
Student Surveys
7 10
1
2-3 2
4-5 2 0
6-7
10-11

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 31

 OMS Goal Report Appendix Fall 2009

Suspensions - Out-Of-School

OSS Students Suspension

Our Academic and

20
Behavior Data support the
Overall growth in positive
survey results of the 20
Parents and Student
14 Surveys
15
3.1% of the students received more
than 1 OSS which 20 (3.6%) of the
students didn’t repeat an offense
resulting in another suspension 10
2.5% (14) Received 2-3 OSS
.1% (1)Received 4-5 OSS
.3% (2)Received 6-7 OSS
5
1 1
2-3 2
4-5 0

OSS
6-7

Oregon School District - Middle School - Appendix 2008-2009 p. 32