Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
III
Franc-e
(1994)
581-593
APRIL
1994,
PAGE
581
Classification
Physic-s
85.25J
Abstiacts 84.60L
Magnetic
P. Tixador
levitation
and
MHD
propulsion
CNRS/CRTBT-LEG,
(Receii,ed
15
B-P-
166.
38042
Grenoble
Cedex
9,
France
July
1993,
revised
J5
Noi'embei
1993,
accepted
?2
Noiember
1993)
Depuis quelques anndes assistons h un reddmarrage de la concernant nous programmes la propulsion supraconductrices. Diffdrents systkmes supraconducteuo de ldvitation et de propulsion ddcrits examinant particulibrement plus l'aspect dlectromagndtique. seront en Quelques h le monde abordds. Les train~ h sustentation magndtique travers seront programme~ pourraient constituer mode de h vites~e dlevde (500 km/h) pour le transport terrestre un nouveau 21e sidde. Les japonais n'ont cessd de s intdresser h ce systdme bobine supraconductrice. Its avec prdindustriel envisagent stade la construction d'une ligne de 43km. En 1991 un avec un amdricain durde de six an~ a dtd lancd dvaluer )es performances des programme pour une pour systdmes h ldvitation Unis. Etats La MHD jmagndto-Hydro-Dynamique) transport pour le aux prdsente des intdressants navale regain d'intdrdt apparait h la propulsion avantages et pour un l'heure actuelle. situe 16 actuels Le japon h la pointe des d6veloppements se encore avec en particulier )es premiers essais en rade de Kobe de Yamato I, navire de 260 tonnes, entraind par
Rdsumd.
ldvitation
et
MHD.
Abstract.
countries.
on,
be 21st
out
levitation propulsion are attention in and MHD attracting several now superconducting MagLev and MHD systems will be described concentrating above all, the electromagnetic Some occurring throughout the world will aspect. programmes described. levitated trains high speed transportation system for the Magnetic could be the new been carried studie~ involving MagLev trains using superconductivity have Intensive century. since 1970. The construction of a 43 km long track is to be the next step. In 1991 a six in Japan
Magnetic
Different
year
programme
was
launched
in
the
United
States
to
evaluate
the
performances
some
of
MagLev
advan-
tran,portation. The MHD stealth characteristics, tages (efficiency, paid towards it nowadays. Japan is also propulsed ship.
systems
for
(MagnetoHydroDynamic)
...)
up for
at
offers
and
tests
interesting
attention is
ton
naval the
propulsion
with the
increasing
of Yamato
being
MHD
top
I,
260
1.
Magnetic
levitated
trains.
I.I France
low
INTRODUCTION.
due
to
in
magnetic
for
levitated trains.
rather
trains
is
difficult
are
the aircraft
tradition
MagLev
than
vehicles trains.
flying
distances
Two
often
582
JOURNAL
DE
PHYSIQUE
III
(trolley arm and transmission railway trains important at high speeds for classical energy guidance and (supporting, mechanical rail and wheel between wire) and the stresses, contact TGV has run speed 400 km/h if the commercial wear). These problems limit the to even upper offering a suppressing vehicles these problems 1990. MagLev 515.3 km/h, 18. May two at are
new
way
forward
or
for
transportation,
to
equal
the
since
tubes this in
pressure concerned by
The interest
would article.
500
km/h.
The
to prove their capacity to transport people at in all for the propulsion remains cases power
increases
as
the
cube
of the
speed.
The
out
use
of
area
power,
but
this
future
aspect is
the
MagLev,
of
at
in
addition
wear,
noise
become 1.2
level,
absence
track
dominating
high speeds
The
possibility for travel at high speds, is its lower aerodynamic noises Nevertheless, quality. the compared to rolling noises (typically above 300 km/h [1]).
to
its
and
ride
OPERATING
was
PRINCIPLE.
idea
a
to
use
an
a-c-
excited
in
coil
for but
the the
levitation
and
propulsion
studies
first
discovered
by
French
inventor,
Bachelet,
1914,
first
only began in the sixties, particularly in the United States (at MIT) which important and Japanese kept on seventies. Only the Germans in the programmes up to now, magnetic levitation again in 1990. The while the United started their States programmes up electromagnetic or electrodynamic. may be attraction electromagnets between controlled The electromagnetic the system is based on conventional and a magnetic track. The gap is small (10 to 15 mm) with magnets and has to be working on this system actively with German researchers controlled very high reliability. are further superconductivity is involved, (development of Transrapid vehicles) but as no no details will be given. The electrodynamic system is based on the repulsion between electromagnets on board anti
short
and
coils
on
the
track.
are
The
vehicle.
but this
Sheets
natural may
less
drag. No control is required, 70km/h. speed, roughly The superconducting used. magnets are
Once in
clearance be
be
dissipated in the track is complex but coils redube the above levitation is only possible a large (100, 150 mm) if powerful
power These
levitation,
the
or
vehicle
in
has
to
guided
is
and
propelled.
functions
may
be
combination.
system,
different
may
to
guidance
the
board
track.
(identical
The
current
more
or
magnet
for
the No
it is
guidance
is
in
same
be
assumed
performed by the interaction between levitation) and coils or conductive example by zero flux coils as shown
for when the and vehicle is at the
create
magnet
sheets
on
in
as
figure
soon
I.
as
eddy
no
induced
coils
centre,
but
this
position,
may be
induced
they
The
forces.
The
used
for
propulsion
[2].
vehicle
Field
by
on
created board
magnets
,,'
'
~
Fig.
I.
Zero
flux
coil
for
guidance.
MAGNETIC
LEVITATION
AND
MHD
PROPULSION
583
Asynchronous electrical electrodynamic systems) by a linear motor. materials with a without magnetic and electrodynamic for systems not are electrodynamic for the solution large gap (low efficiency and power factor). The best multiphase winding on board. The field with the synchronous linear motor system is the whose frequency supplied by track windings the converter armature a power on are 2 fL~, L~ ~f j is matched to the speed (V of the vehicle (V magnet pole pitch). With this supply is thus solvid. minimal and the problem of energy board is active track the on power for propulsion is The board indeed theoretically (short circuited superconducting power on zero magnets). It is reduced practically to just the thermal losses of the cryostat. The power on board for the refrigerator, lighting and air-conditioning may be electromagnetically helium supplied without through the track coils for the levitation and special coils on board using contact harmonic fields [3]. At low speeds batteries supply the power. In all superconducting coils for instance the second operate in persistent mode, cases see
(electromagnetic
solutions
and
suited
part
1.3
of
the
paper.
PROGRAM.
JAPANESE
The
Japanese
2
to
started 20
tons
their
MagLev
tested
a
manufactured studies
have
eight
always
ML
from
the
(Tab. Ii
system
world
programme on a 7 km of 517
in
1970,
coil
and
have Their
board
electrodynamic
due
to
[4].
board
Their
soo
famous
its
using speed
long superconducting
km/h
track.
on
record
in
1979.
On
refrigerators appeared in 1979. The inverted T guideway has been left, in favour of the U-shaped configuration (Fig. 2). The vehicles MLUoo2 (Tab. II) and present oo2N close to a commercial version, with a length of 22 m and a weight greater than MLU are oo2N has replaced oo2 which destroyed by a fire, in 1991, due to the 17 tons. MLU MLU was
helium
puncture
In
of
tyre.
construction
in
a
1989
the
of
new
test
track
was
intended
an
to
deterrnine commercial
the
real
capacities
This
of
MagLev
now a
systems
design,
would
the
closely
form
are
ressembling
part of
numerous a
eventual
link have
design.
and Osaka.
area
track,
avoid
under mountainous
construction,
area
future
and
between
a
Tokyo
Crossing
to
tunnels
large
cross-section
problems (aspect ratio of train to tunnel about o. I ). On board the three functions of levitation, guidance and propulsion are accomplished by a single superconducting guidance are assumed by 8 shaped coils (Fig. 3). This On the track, levitation and magnet. magnetic drag at low speeds when the vehicle is supported by the the geometry suppresses superconducting winding axis. At higher coils is on the wheels : the of the 8 shaped centre induce retracted and the 8 shaped coils speeds, when the levitation is achieved, the wheels are magnetic spring is and the magnetic drag low guidance forces. The large levitation and windings are distributed is rigid. The three phase coefficient in the vertical direction armature
pressure
Table I.
aerodynamic
MagLei,
Year
test
vehicles
Name
deieloped
in
Japan.
1972
LSM 200
ML
4 7
m m
2 tons 3.5
tons
asynchronous
motor
100
1975
ML
100A
m m m
m m
3.6
tons
1977
1979
ML 500
ML 500R MLU
13.5
12.6 10
22 22
10 tons 12.7 10
17
tons tons tons
World
record 517
kndh
ml 002
MLU MLU
002N
20 tons
584
JOURNAL
DE
PHYSIQUE
III
'-i
Fig.
2.
MLU
vehicle
on
the
track.
This overlapping reduces the electromagnetic superconducting coils which better that way a-care thyristor inverters protected from quench. The power is supplied by two substations with GTO used for the leading to a possible increase of the frequency compared to the cycloconverters previous test track. The enhancement of the frequency reduces the magnet pole pitch. The between the trains articulated with the bogies superconducting coils would be supporting the magnetic shielding This configuration the magnetic field for the but reduces passengers, a cars. dimensions of the should be 20 m long (28 m for end should be perhaps provided. The cars capacity of 64. Each bogie carries cars) ?.9 m wide and 3.3 m high, with a two passenger superconducting magnets in both its cold box and cryogenic fluid tanks (Fig. 4), two helium landing gear and the retractable system for support and guidance, and emergency compressors~ widely used for materials alloys and carbon fibre composite damping systems. Aluminium are lightness.
on
two
overlapping
and
layers
the
in the
side
wall
track.
variations
also
losses
in
the
1.4
AMERICAN
PROGRAM
[6].
levitation
In
1990
the
NMI
(National
States.
MagLev
Additional
Initiative)
was
created
to
evaluate 1991
the
the
impact
ISTEA
of
trains
in the
United
impetus
was
supplied
established 7?5
a
in
a
by
(Intermodal
Levitation
programme,
National
programme.
Magnetic
This
Transportation Efficiency Act) which Surface Prototype Development Programrrie , a six year $ incorporate would committee, directed by a federal
million track
not
N 4
MAGNETIC
LEVITATION
AND
MHD
PROPULSION
585
Table
II.
Characteristics
of
MLV
002
vehicle.
Dimensions
22
3
17
3,7 m3
tons
mm
l10 Maximum
speed
2 1.7
x
420
km/h
44
Seafing capacity
SC magnet
x
poles kg
track
kAt
m :
dimension, weight
type
0.5 m2~ 77
race
magnetomotive
pole pitch
Matefial
max.
force
700
2. I
NbTi, I
1.06
field
Propulsion
Max force
Synchronous
79.4 0-28
current
motor
kN
Hz
Frequency
Voltage,
5.8 kV,
900 A
~ee~jj~se
~
ili~
~~~#~~
guidance)
~~~~~
and
~~~~~~~~~
(ievitation
guidance)
Three
phase
armature
SC magnet
~
Vehiqle
i~~~e~~
phase 2
Fig.
3.
Schematic
structure
of
the
Japanese
MagLev
train.
existing mode of interface with switch and than 19 mile long with a guideway an an accelerations transportation. Among the specifications required are speeds up to 135 m/s, high (0.16 g's), climb grades of 35 %a at full speed and 100 %v at reduced speed and short radii of considered should be completed and from the NMI (400 m). A complete report curvature has planned administration More recently the Clinton before the launching of this programme. Maglev . for High Speed rail and funds
less
586
JOURNAL
DE
PHYSIQUE
III
Reffigerator
LHe
tank
Power lead
LNz tank
Service Outer
port
Support
SC shield
Superinsulator
Persistent
current
switch
Vacuum
Fig.
4.
Cryogenic
system
(magnet,
cryostat
and
refrigerator)
of
the
Japanese
train
[5].
Germans which involved Japaneses and to are Americans already defined their basic solutions, clean slate provides innovative ideas opportunities for They consider basic studies about subjects such concepts. propulsion, conditioning technologies, and power power safety, environmental effects..
and have Four
contracts
were
Contrary
in have
programmes
no
since
many
years
preferential design. This and development of new MagLev magnetic suspension, guidance as transferring and control, costs,
studies of new MagLev concepts. The four Magnetplane International and Foster-Miller team different projects, but they all involve using superconducting windings and a team) have rather linear synchronous for propulsion. motor The Bechtel superconducting magnets distributed in the vehicle interacting group proposes with a ladder track for suspension and guidance. The Grumman is the only involved in the electromagnetic levitation with a team group design close to the German TR07. Nevertheless the actively controlled iron-pole magnets on the vehicle superconducting providing thus a 50 mm air gap (around 10 mm for TR07). are The works idea developed in the seventies by MIT [7]. The track magnet plane team on an
issued
in
1991
for
definition
teams
(Bechtel
team,
Grumman
team,
consists which
in
continuous
sheet
bended
into
semi
circular
arc
surrounded
the
vehicle
bottom
a
contains
ride for
quality
foster
The
is
levitation
propulsion
motor
is
electronics
high banking of the vehicle. involved in the electrodynamic system using coils in the guideway and discrete superconducting The supply of the magnets on board. original in that it occurs only in the vicinity of the vehicle using switches which improve the motor efficiency.
distributed This
pancake
windings.
geometry
provides
self
2.
2.I
MHD
sea-water
propulsion.
The first the
MHD
INTRODUCTION.
studies for
were
carried
out
in
the
United
States,
during
the
sixties.
As
shown
farther,
need
(several m~) for the MHD propulsion to be development. The present development consider practically this technology, and to The MHD propulsion offers potential progress.
its
high magnetic inductions (~ 5 T) in large volumes interesting, from an efficiency point of view slowed level of superconducting winding makes it possible
numerous
programs
advantages
such
as
world and
are
in
speeds,
MAGNETIC
LEVITATION
AND
MHD
PROPULSION
~87
an
enhanced
maneuverability
stealth.
The
increased
latter
as
undetectable
2.2
PRINCIPLE.
submarine
The
survivability, a better payload flexibility but above all and explains the military interest in the possibility of building Red October suggested in the Tom Clancy novel .
an
an
MHD
propulsion
may
be
inductive
(a.c.
MHD)
or
conductive
(d.c.
MHD)
Table
(Tab. III).
III.
Coniparison
betw.een
a-c-
and
d-c-
MHD
thrusters.
MHD
Itlductor ~~~~~ low
~
no
d.c.
MHD
a.c.
in
mode
no
d.c.
better
lower
Cryogeny
Problems
very
low
losses in
persistent
electrolyse
a.c.
losses
for
superconductors
current
a.c.
mode
need for
leads
electrodes~
sea
water
superconducting
reactive
winding,
be
The
a-c-
MHD
a sea
operates
as
linear
asynchronous
field
wave
board,
of
the
create
travelling
water
magnetic
their the
currents.
in the
conductive
and
to
interaction
with
the
ship multiphase
electrodes
in
is
linked
the
speed
In
of its
field related
Multiphase windings, on naturally induced in the water. are magnetic field propels the ship. The speed itself proportional to the frequency of the
electrical
motor.
Currents
excitation
principle,
the
a-c-
MHD
is
attractive
as
it
does
not
use
problems. Nevertheless the advantages stop sea there. A-cMHD multiphase superconducting windings needs supplied variable with frequency windings These have still reached sufficient of degree currents. not yet a The of advancement. absence in a superconducting winding is only true if the total losses is direct it The eighties of and the field around have the current constant. seen emergence remain in difficulties still superconducting with very low a-c. (50 Hz) losses [8]~ but strands Frequencies, for MHD propulsion, capacity (several kA) cables. particular, for high current superconducting windings. but the would be low (a few Hz) and would reduce the stresses on bulkiness losses, though low, significantly penalise the cryogenics in particular the weight and helium refrigerator. of the Moreover the would be very high (in the order of reactive power 109 Var for submarines) would difficulties and and lead to additional problems. The d-cMHD is based interaction between the magnetic induction, created by a d.c. on a electromagnet on board, and d.c. current, perpendicular to the field, imposed by a voltage difference between electrodes in the conductive An opposing electromotive two water. sea forces linked to the ship's displacement. The variation of the magnetic current appears or of the induction but basically only the force is controlled the current may adjust the propulsion as superconducting operating in persistent mode. magnets are
water
and
solves
The
electrodes
for
in
the
sea
water
have service
and
to
fulfil
and
at
several
a
electrical,
reasonable which
are
mechanical
cost.
and
a
chemical
requirements electrolysis
stealth.
out
long
sea
operating
water
occurs
Moreover,
for
have
partial
of
carried
of the
ideal
produces
has
not
bubbles
undesirable
studies
reasons
The
material
for
or
electrodes
yet
been
found,
but
been
for
carbon,
noble
metals
compounds
like
TiRu02,
TiIr02..
588
JOURNAL
DE
PHYSIQUE
III
N 4
The
electrical stored in
case
power
is
supplied
level
is
from
Diesel
tens
engines,
in
gas
turbines submarines.
or
small
nuclear
reactor.
The
MW
present
The
as
an
huge
emergency
magnetic
power
energy
magnet
of
the
could
serve
supply
in the
As
a
for the
MHD,
as
extemal
this
(Fig. 5)
system
be MHD
or
internal
its
duct).
acoustical essential
Nevertheless
of
be
is
signature
characteristic
must
not
substituted
excitation
by
magnetic
would
for
the the
magnet
with is better
low
most
as
possible.
studied
obtained is is
Currently
systems,
as as
systems
induction
intemal
for
this
reason,
the
the
confined.
naturally
active
a
(coils)
systems
the
or
passive
under
(magnetic
From
are
already
ideal and
sensitive
hull
parameter.
the
channel
around
magnetic stealth be must materials) shielding increases the this point of view toroidal the close to this configuration with an
parts
of
the
active
magnet
and
by
the
electrodes
(Fig. 6).
Elecuode
~~~
Elecuical field flux disuibufion
Magnefic
flux
field
disbibufion
Fig.
5.
Ship
propelled
by
d-c-
MHD
(external
system).
MHD
Thruster
Magnefic field
dis~~~fion
Elecbical
~,
,
' i
"
~j~~t~~d~
+,
'
#$~~~n
Fig.
6. Annular MHD
?"~,(,',,
'
'~
~~~~~ ~~~~
thruster
for
submarine.
MAGNETIC
LEVITATION
AND
MHD
PROPULSION
589
the
Considering efficiency
thrust
is
proportional given by
to
the
square
of the
speed,
an
approximate
expression
for
~2
~
"
~2
B:
"
"PV
~
~MHD
water
magnetic
magnetic
induction,
force
v:
speed,
p:
sea
resistivity,
d~~~.
MHD
volume,
speed
does
the
water not
take
into
for
account
a more
the
losses
linked
to to
a
the
partial
extent
electrolysis
due
to
of the
sea
It
shows
sea
requirement
decreases overall
high
than
the
induction
level
great
to
an
resistivity
the
water.
of
The
Cu)
reach
which the
leads
As
efficiency
the
speed of
ship.
10 m/s, of 10 T
The
and 7 T
could
60 %
For
and
50
high important ohmic losses in example of magnitude for % for magnetic inductions
the
b for 2 T.
comparison
d-c4.5
conventional
make
efficiency
it
is
40b.
present
induction
like
for field
the
superconducting
T with NbTi tokamak
at
magnets
up
to
useful
at
levels
of
K,
8-9 T
with
The
use
2 K
superconducting
9-10T
at
Tore
Supra
[10].
Nbisn
Compounds with transition metals like Nb3Sn, Nb3Al, Nb3Ge (A15 compounds) have a higher margin compared to NbTi and temperature materials, taking into requirements for the magnet (vibrations, the may be interesting account impacts) but their technical development is not so advanced except for Nb3Sn and their use is difficult than NbTi. with The induction level is not the only This more parameter to consider. induction level and the volume magnetized lead to huge of magnetic to be amounts energy of the order of one tenth of a 10~ J for submarines, and then to huge mechanical The stresses. mechanical has to be strong to resists to these forces very rigidly. As a matter of fact structure the displacement, micrometric, of a superconducting strand in a magnetic field may lead even quench which has to be absolutely avoided. For especially for embarked materials, to its military uses, these enhanced by the need to fulfil impacts. Moreover this stresses structure are be light and neutral buoyancy. The realization of lighweight high field must must assume a would be one of the challenges for MHD technology. The prejent techniques using magnets steels heavy in the intemational project on nuclear fusion ITER toroidal the coils too are would have a weight of 10 000 tons including 770 tons of superconducting materials structure without the cryostat but vessels (6 T on the toroidal axis, 13 T peak on the superconductor and magnetic energy of 106 GJ). The theoretical limits high. The virial nevertheless theorem a are links the magnetic the of coil by the expression [I1] to structure energy mass
increase the 4.5 K. ~
~~~
W~
P
~~
_~
~
in tension, density, M~: magnetic allowable mass stress, p: energy, ~. in compression. M~ mass limit of the magnetic Assuming a structure is only in tension, the theoretical energy by mass materials. Graphite structural unity is given by the specific of the ~/p epoxy energy steels : 150 kJ/kg compared to 30 kJ/kg. composites offer much higher values than classical of of the order superconducting have a specific comparison, For magnets present energy achievable in a near future [I I]. 10 kJ/kg. A value of 50 kJ/kg may be referential, induction, in the ship As for MagLev vehicles, the magnetic constant may be that is to say, short operating in persistent mode created by superconducting magnets after coils. After the magnet has been energized by a current and circuited from a power source shorted out with a superconducting link, the power supply may the magnet terrninals have been
W~~~.
590
JOURNAL
DE
PHYSIQUE
III
be
the
suppressed
current
and
the losses
current
leads
may
be
removed.
the total
lead
power land.
of the
helium
as
the
on
may
be
low
if the
cool
down
is
carried
out
2.3
[12]. Ocean Foundation undertook In 1985 the Ship and research propelled by MHD. This project gathered together officials and people from universities and industry. It included manufacturing of a complete experimental ship the called Yamato I. This ship of significant scale completed in 1991 and is under tests at sea was This, the first big ship with propulsion, is a surface MHD ship whose main now. characteristics gathered in is table IV. Yamato I propelled by electromagnetic thrusters two are located in two bulges in the hull under the ship (Fig. 7). Each thruster is composed of six superconducting dipoles with a bore of 360 mm (MHD 240 channel mm) in a single ~b fed by an on-board helium refrigerator. The dipoles are arranged to minimize the cryostat outside leakage of the magnetic field the thruster. The have been performed with tests an induction of 2 T, with a maximum value of 3 T. The after 20 min of latter led to a quench operation. The experimental data agree with the theoretical calculations. The perforrnances of Yamatol low, but we have that it is the first to note are very experimental ship with MHD thrusters. The objectives and the to were prove its feasibility difficult, high technology project. More so than in Japanese capacity to develop a complete, the Case Of the MagLev vehicles, Yamato I is an operation carried for of prestige. out reasons
PROGRAM civilian
IN
JAPAN
about
ships
Table
IV.
Some
characteristics
of ships
propelled by
MHD
thrusters
(the
sabmai"ine
is
theoretical
study).
Demonstration Yamato I
tons
Nuclear
submarine
tons
280
10 000
L=
L=30-1=10-h=3.5
I10m-#=I2m
Thruster
number
and type
6 cylindrical 3
5.4
m
m
anttular
active
total
length
bore
2
15
17
m
m m
length
#
x
=
channel
240
mm
x
(2
6)
1.5 1060
en
29
18
tons
coil
shape (dipole)
4 T
(tortls)
useful
max.
6 T 9 T
13.5 GJ
storaged
supra.
NbTi 180
A/mm2
conductor
Cable in conduct 80 kA
He K
4.2K
warrr
II W
14A
180 kW
I I tons
4 m/s
15 m/s
<2ib
MAGNETIC
LEVITATION
AND
MHD
PROPULSION
591
'f'-
'-
-.~j,Y[$
''$-
'4
<I
.0$'-'~
"~
j',
_'
n
j~~,
2
i~
Fig.
7.
Yamato
I,
MHD
ship
(Height
3.5
m,
Width
lo
m,
Length
30 m).
2.4
PROGRAMS
States
IN
THE
UNITED
STATES.
but
The
later
first
studies
of
MHD
were
carried
out
in
the
interrupted. Since then naval research into were propulsion has the concerned classical propulsion, but using superconducting (in motors particular the experimental ship Jupiter II with a homopolar superconducting of motor 2.2MW). Programs about MHD re-continued the end of the eighties. They at were are financed by DARPA (Defence Advanced Research Project Agency) and the Naval Research Technology Office. should theoretical knowledge of MHD These provide a better programs phenomena and some tests on the key points. The experimental tests use the flow loops at the NUWC in New Port, or at Argonne National Laboratory with a large Superconducting magnet. The description of a MHD project [9] (Tab. IV) enables the definition of some of submarine the major points.
United
in
the
sixties,
2.5
PROGRAM
IN
C.E.1.
are
[13].
The
in
a
Russian
a
are
certainly
of
channel
involved d-cMHD
inside.
in
themselves.
They
studying
with
particular
screw
solution of the
duct
with
The
magnet
MHD
of
this
losses
two
are
by
2.6
concentric
IN
simplicity and the light weight heightened compared to classical solenoids for active magnetic
FRANCE called
magnet
channels. with in
system,
The
two
real
screw
shielding
interested created
PROGRAM
[14].
PAMIR
France
is been
MHD
studies.
for
between throught co-operation a C.E.A (Commissariat h l'dnergie Atomique, CEN Cadarache) and the industrials development of (Framatome and DT21). The objective of PAMIR is the two industrial has been applications of MHD, but not, for instance, of propulsion. A program issued Techniques de la Ddldgation by the DRET (Direction des Recherches Etudes et Grenoble Gdndrale l'Armement), laboratories in involving Industrie four Jeumont and pour (LEGI-IMG, Madylam, CREMGP and LEG). This will attempt to carry out general program studies fluid the mechanics (flow in MHD duct, evaluation of drag systems aspects on
has
592
JOURNAL
DE
PHYSIQUE
between
of
III
force~
.),
into
numerical
account
modelling
the
non
with
coupling
distribution
fluid
mechanics
and
electromagnetism,
aspects
taking
uniform
majnetic
properties, electrodes, phenomena modelling, magnets (configuration and shape, magnetic signature and its reduction, magnetic shielding), overall performance prediction. An experimental is carried especially for electrochemiout programme corrosion of electrodes, laboratory close loop (electrolysis, stry studies using a seawater gas production~ ).
(seawater
3.
Refrigeration
on
board.
Either superconducting low solutions the There magnets at temperature. to keep two a are fillings, or between sufficiently large amount of liquid helium may be stored on the vehicle two first solution, of losses. The refrigerator on board may provide the cryogenic helium a provides a high efficiency, large capacity liquefaction in weight for the vehicle, minimum transferts constraints and the and brings large plants, but requires skilled to out persons carry operational complexity. It cannot be applied to MHD ships. If the cool down is made by a landMHD refrigerator required for the superconducting borne large capacity system, the helium for submarines (for example from Tab. [Vi the power does magnet not pose any problems leads). lack of it, of hundreds of watt (depending on the presence, current to amounts or some respectively, roughly 5 10 weight and volume corresponds whose It tons to to a system are, (10 000 tons and 12 000 m~). 10-15 m3 ; low figures compared to those for the~ submarine and requires the flexible, but this refrigerators for MagLev vehicles much On board are more refrigerators with low weight and bulkiness, developement of small unit helium very high developed for sensitive vibrations. Such have been reliability and which are less to systems and for example~ detectors) satellites but for very small (lower than I W cool, not to are power developed such a vehicle researchers always suitable for a levitated (power too low). Japanese helium refrigerator [15] in 1979 and have since obtained interesting performances. some
Conclusion
and
perspectives.
and MHD
are
MagLev
systems get good
vehicles may be
two
possible
applications
but
of
designed
with
conventional
magnets
several
MagLev without superconductivity. Japanese MagLev reached an advanced degree of demonstration. Superconducting MagLev system is feasible from technical point of view but its challenge is to prove its economical interest compared to high speed trains except if speeds higher than 400 km/h are absolutely required. For MHD there is no altemative superconductivity as large volumes be magnetized to must high fields suitable performances. The studies have often at stayed at the stage of to get theoretical designs whereas the first MHD ship of significant size, Yamato, shows very low performances. Nevertheless MHD propulsion offers an innovative solution with significant benefits. The increased stealth is perhaps of the interesting improvements if the most one magnetic signature may be reduced to a very low level. A lot of research and development are still needed study and to solve the difficulties related MHD thrusters. One to to numerous technical bolt is the superconducting with light mechanical able magnet structure to a withstand electromagnetic forces and impacts. Superconductors with a high critical would greatly modify the of temperature not structure
the
the
MagLev
you
cannot
magnets
or
a
of the
cryostat
for
nevertheless
large gain
of for a few simplifications. They will bring course, refrigerator the weight and the volume of at a given power, fifty divided roughly by compared helium refrigerator. to are a high T~ materials for moving systems is their much higher stability
except,
the
MAGNETIC
LEVITATION
AND
MHD
PROPULSION
593
margin,
as
well
as
lower
sensitivity
for of
ducting
stresses
oxides
will
offer
occur.
the
opportunities
a-c-
losses.
These
supercon-
due
to
the
electromagnetic
Acknowledgments.
This
study
has
been
made
the
framework
valuable
of
co-operation
I
between
to
the
DGA
(Ddldgation
Thibault,
Gdndrale
C.
H.
pour Kom et
l'Arrnement)
Y. Brunet
Jeumont
Industrie.
would
like
thank
MM.
J. P.
their
discussions.
References
[Ii [2]
Moreau
A.,
Le
contact
roue-rail,
N.,
Revue
gdndrale Proceedings
des
chemins
de for
Takahashi
T.,
Maki
Miyashita
vehicles
T.,
,
Combined
system
of the fifth
78-81.
M.,
Maki
of
a
N.,
Saitoh
T.,
Kobayashi T.,
levitated
Sawano
IEEE
E.,
Trans.
Ohshima
On
board
magnetically
status
vehicke,
Magn.
(1992)
power 474-477.
supply
of the
Current
Magnet
Advanced
[5] [6]
[71
H.,
in the of MagLev transportation world , system Technology Conference, Tsukuba-Japan (1989) 9-17. for Magnetically Trains, Q. Rep. Materials Levitated
Proceedings
RTRI
33
(1992)
160-
Coffey H. T., U-S- MagLev : (1993) 863-868. Y., Hoenig M. O., Kolm Iwasa Magn. lo (1974) 402-405.
Dubots
status
and
opportunities,
of
a
IEEE
Trans.
Appl.
Sapercondactii,ity
vehicle,
IEEE
Trans.
H.
H.,
Design
full
scale
magnetplane
Behaviour J. of
[81
P.,
Fdvrier
A.,
very
Renard fine
J.
conductors
with
filaments
magnetic fields,
H.,
Phys.
V.,
J.
470.
[9]
[10]
Swallom Duchateau
D.
W.,
J.
Sadovnik
Bessette
I., D.,
Gibbs
J.
S.,
D.~
field
27
Gurol
Nguyen
Naval
L.
Bergh
H.
H.,
Magnetohydrodynamic
L.,
current,
submarine
toroidal
propulsion
Ciazinski
Eng.
a
(May
1991),
141-157.
RibandP.,
after
year
Turk of
controlling
nominal
I
TORE
SUPRA IEEE
M.
system
Trans.
Magn.
J.
(1991)
S. D.,
2053-2056.
II
Leung E.
IEEE
M.
W.,
Trans.
Hilal
A.,
23
Parmer
F.,
Peck
Lightweight
magnet
applications,
Magn.
K.,
(1987)
Nakato
1331-1335.
[12]
Motora
[13]
[14] [15]
project on of the R&D outline S., An M., Takezawa propulsion in Japan , Proceedings of MHDS 91. their flows and MHD of electrolyte Mikhailova Bashkatov L. A., Investigation V. A., screw Seminar Sheva 7th Bur application in development of ship jet engines for on commerce , and (Febrtlary 93). MHD Flow Turbulence Proceedings MHD Thrusters Pilaud A., Some Thibault J. P., Alemany A., seawater aspects of ,
S.,
Imaichi
superconducting
MHD
ship
of
MHDS
91,
Herai
211-218.
Nakashima
H.,
MagLev'89
system
for
magnetic
levitation
vehicles
Proceedings
of