October 15, 2009 Board of Overseers of the Bar 97 Winthrop Street August Maine ear Overseers Board!

" have received #our October $, 2009 %etter infor&ing &e that due to 'an unforeseen oversight (ith an origina% )ane% Me&ber*s revie(+ #ou have vacated the ,rievance )ane%*s decision and have ordered this be revie(ed b# a ne( pane%"t is concerning that this decision (as ta.en at the sa&e ti&e Mr- Wa/&an has sub&itted a %etter infor&ing the Board that 0udge Mos.o(it1 heard three hours in a dis2ua%ification hearing b# 3en A%tshu%er and 0udge Mos.o(it1 ru%ed no vio%ation- " hope, and assu&e, there is no %in.What is happening in Maine, and nation4(ide, 5see, for e/a&p%e, the op4ed in toda#*s 6hristian Science Monitor7 fa&i%# court is deep%# concerning- So&eone appears to be protecting and8or a%%o(ing Mr- Wa/&an to (age his ca&paign of destruction- 9hat 0udge Mos.o(it1 ru%ed no evidence in the dis2ua%ification hearing is hard%# surprising given a%% of 0udge Mos.o(it1*s other ru%ings: 1- ;irst in the divorce hearing 0udge Mos.o(it1 ru%ed no evidence of abuse despite an entire da# of evidence inc%uding the arresting po%ice officer and gui%t# p%ea of do&estic assau%t b# Mr- Ma%en.oa- " can, if the Bar (ou%d %i.e, send the transcript fro& the hearing, a%ong (ith Mr- Ma%en.o*s po%ice record and court record fro& (hen he (as 1$ and near%# .i%%ed another chi%d2- Second in the dis2ua%ification hearing 5" (i%% ordered the transcript and provide it for the Overseers revie(7 Mr- A%tshu%er presented an a&a1ing a&ount of evidence (hich, again, 0udge Mos.o(it1 c%ai&s does not e/ista- " have as.ed Mr- At%shu%er to send to the Bar the entire pac.et of evidence that Mr- At%shu%er presented- Mr- Wa/&an %ied on the stand and <isa Bisceg%ia, the (itness that Mr- Wa/&an %ied about, has a%read# fi%ed her o(n separate co&p%aint (ith the Overseers- )o%%# 6a&pbe%%, another (itness that da#, has a%so fi%ed a separate co&p%aint (ith the Overseers- Stephanie Wright (as not present to testif# because she has been so scared b# Mr- Wa/&an she (i%% not have an#thing to do (ith the case- r- Braden (as not a%%o(ed to testif# due to court i&posed ti&e constraints=- Most recent%# (e had #et another hearing for a );A on beha%f of &# daughter to due se/ua% abuse (hich Spur(in. testified for $ hours to the rea%it# and evidence of this se/ua% abuse- 0udge Mos.o(it1 ru%ed again>no evidencea- " a& inc%uding Spur(in.*s report and (i%% for(ard a%ong the transcript (hen " receive it-

9hat 0udge Mos.o(it1 found no evidence in the dis2ua%ification hearing shou%d not inf%uence the Overseers- " have appea%ed to the Overseers precise because it see&s " (i%% not be ab%e to get a fair hearing (ith 0udge Mos.o(it1Mr- Wa/&an is destro#ing a chi%d and a fa&i%#- 9he '(ar+ he ta%.s about is his entire%#- " have atte&pted again and again and again and again to sett%e and end the %itigation and " (i%% pa# an# price to end this %itigation e/cept the price of %osing &# chi%d entire%#- Mr- Wa/&an has said the on%# sett%e&ent he (i%% accept is so%e custod# for Mr- Ma%en.o (ith &e p%aced on supervised visitsAs for &# financia% resources versus &# for&er husband*s financia% situation that Mr- Wa/&an a%%udes to, " a& near ban.ruptc# because of the never4ending %itigation, because Mr- Wa/&an has represented Mr- Ma%en.o pro bono for near%# t(o #ears fi%ing an a&a1ing a&ount of &otions against &e, da# in and da# out, that " have had to pa# over ?200,000 no( to defend &#se%f and &# chi%d- 9his is &one# that has been ta.en direct%# fro& &# daughter- "t is not even &one# that has gone to Mr- Ma%en.o- "t has gone entire%# to %a(#ers, ,A<s, and court ps#cho%ogistsMr- Wa/&an is co&p%ete%# out of contro% and is using the %a( as a (eapon to destro# peop%e*s %ives- "f the Overseers do not arrest this behavior (ho .no(s ho( &an# &ore %ives MrWa/&an (i%% destro# as he has done (ith &e and &# daughterSincere%#, <ori @andrahan, )h- 20742214770$