Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Early Days
The British East India Company initiated, a rudimentary forest administration was initiated in India , during 1806, to help augment ship building timber supply for the British Naval Industry. The sole purpose, initially, was to tap Indias supposedly vast forest resources to salvage the crisis ridden ship building industry in Great Britain. Captain Watson
Page 1
Personal Views
of Madras Police, who was appointed the first Conservator of Forests of Malabar, worked for 23 years, to mark large sized trees in the forests, fell the same and have them brought over to the depots for export to Britain. In essence, the initial rudimentary forest establishment was neither well organised nor scientifically oriented. The administrative control of forests initially vested in the Revenue Board with the District Collectors providing the vital administrative as well as managerial inputs. Later, nominal control over forest organisation was passed on to the Public Works Department.
Personal Views
Of course, it can not be said that any forest which is now thought to be necessary, or worth preserving, will be held to be so for all time; but the facilities for destruction forest are so great, the difficulty of reproducing it so insurmountable, and the general tendency in this country to accept as truth the fallacy that the clearance of forest is of itself necessarily an improvement so common, that it will be important to record forest boundaries and to set forest apart in a very strict and forma manner, and it seems even possible that the object might be best attained by an Act of the Legislature. But the exact way of doing this must be a matter for further consideration. Having thus secured, as far as possible, that the boundaries of those forests shall be respected, which it is intended to preserve, and having obtained maps and surveys of the whole of them, a solid basis would be got on which to establish an efficient forest administration, the great end of which should be to obtain the largest possible quantity of produce from the forests consistent with their permanent usefulness. The conditions under which this would be possible would probably be various in various places, and the success could only be looked for as the result of experience, and careful and continued experiment brought to perfection under local management, but under some central control, or system of inspection. The despatch further noted that, once removed out of the category of waste land, it would go a long way in obtaining a more defined position for the forest administration and helping the department assume a distinct plan of their own. The despatch went on to suggest appointment of a special officer to be placed in charge of the business.
Page 3
Personal Views
Wastelands ( 1861 ). Soon, process of reservation of forested tracts of wastelands for the purpose of scientific management began. Seized with the need to preserve and manage Government forests, the Governor General of India in Council passed The Indian Forest Act ( Act VII of 1865 ) on 24 th February, 1865. The Act provided for notification of Forests while making it clear that such notification shall not abridge or affect any existing rights of individual or communities. The Act also empowered the Government to make rules for preservation and management of forests. The Act of 1965 was quite simple and had been enacted to enable the forest officers to practise forest management in the notified areas for generating maximum revenue in perpetuity besides ensuring forest preservation through regulative and simple punitive measures. It may also be borne in mind the forest estates were carved out of Government waste lands. Rules framed under the Act dealt with the details of Forest Conservancy such as the staff to be employed, the procedure to be followed in creating Reserved Forests and Unreserved Forests, their demarcation, the acts prohibited in such forests and the privileges of the local villagers or ryots with either class of forests. Practices such as grazing, setting fire to vegetation, unauthorised felling and shifting cultivation were prohibited in Reserved Forests. Thus wasteful and extravagant utilisation of forests was prevented thereby paving the way for scientific management. However, the progress of organisation was hampered by the realisation that district officials, in general, displayed considerable difficulty in grasping the true aims of forest policy and forest organisation and in recognising that the interests of the people were involved. The progress was also retarded in some provinces by the misdirected zeal of Forest Officers themselves, who endeavoured to put the Rules in force with uncompromising rigour amongst a population and under conditions where compulsion was an impossibility; the inevitable consequence being a set back to the very cause which they had set out to espouse! A major resistance to the 1865 Act came from the Board of Revenue of the Madras Presidency, who opposed it on several counts including land tenure system, peoples rights and privileges over forest produce, reluctance of the judiciary to accept Forest Rules and legal, powers of petty forest officers. Similarly, resistance also came from the Bombay Presidency, where Government forests were frequently so interlaced with private forest lands that protection was impossible without a system of strict control over all forest produce in transit, which the 1865 Act did not provide for. The progress of forest conservancy was hampered in the Bombay and Madras Presidencies by the inability of the responsible senior Revenue officials to recognise the
Page 4
Personal Views
great importance of the new administrative work in the interest of the people thereby creating difficulties in the introduction of forest conservancy. In the absence of government control over forests coming within the boundaries of villages, management of village forests remained a problem for many years in the Bombay Presidency. The various difficulties encountered included cultivation on slopes by Thakurs ( in Matheran ), setting apart tracts for gowlees, dealings with Wurlies, Katkaries and other hill tribes, drawing water from forest springs, prohibitive expenses involved in administration etc. The Indian Forest Act, 1878 brought about comprehensive changes in the legal control over forests. It led to the constitution of Reserved, Protected and Village Forests. It also provided for settlement of private / customary rights to forest produce in Reserved Forests and prescribed regulation of usage in respect of Protected Forests. However, a major feature was the introduction of Village Forests, to be managed by the village Panchayat / Cooperative. The Indian Forest Act of 1927 replaced the earlier 1878 Act. This Act embodied all the major provisions of the earlier one, extending it to include those relating to the duty on timber. The Act is still in force although there have been several amendments made by State Governments. The preamble of the Act states that it seeks to consolidate the law relating to the transit of forest produce and the duty leviable on timber and other forest produce.
Personal Views
itself being done by villagers and zamindars. He also suggested bringing legislation for taking over private areas / private forests for increasing village forests. Sir Howard, therefore, could foresee the need for participatory forest management for meeting the livelihood / forestry needs of villagers. He, however, rued the fact that Chapter II and V of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 largely remained unimplemented. Unfortunately, post independence, his invaluable suggestions about increasing the forest cover, need for scientific management of land for climate amelioration and participatory management of forest resources received scant attention for a long time.
Personal Views
In the whole process of recognition of forestry as a land use spanning about 150 years, forested tracts of India have suffered great upheavals and managed forests have been badly honeycombed, rendering scientific forest management well neigh impossible! The FRA (2006) is another watershed in Indian Forestry with recognition of the Forest dwellers rights, including cultivation, over forest lands. However, the impact of this legislation on forest laws, administration and management is still to be analyzed , understood and pave way for course correction. The Joint Forest Management, in its present avatar, only serves to further complicate the issues related the above impact, therefore, needs to be reworked and institutionalized in accordance with Constitutional provisions.
Personal Views
of Local Self Government was expanded to introduce three tier system of Panchayati Raj Institutions, with the enactment of The Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The Village Panchayats Act provided, since the beginning, for management of village forests assigned to the Panchayat under Section 28 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Yet, these legal provisions were not invoked while ushering in the JFM.
Page 8
Personal Views
Other Related Legislations
Another central Act, viz., The Biodiversity Act, 2003 provides, under Section 41, for every local body, village as well as municipal, to constitute a biodiversity Management Committee ( BMC ) for the purpose of promoting conservation, sustainable use and documentation of biological diversity including preservation of habitats, conservation of land races, folk varieties and cultivars, domesticated stocks and breeds of animals and microorganisms and chronicling of knowledge relating to biological diversity. The Act provides for the BMC to be consulted by the National Biodiversity Authority & the State Biodiversity Board while taking any decision relating to the use of biological resources and knowledge associated with such resources occurring within its jurisdiction. The BMC may levy charges from any person for accessing or collecting any biological resource for commercial purpose. Sections 42, 43 & 44 of the Act provide for constitution and application of Local Biodiversity fund for conserving & promoting biodiversity. Finally, The Scheduled Tribes and Other Forest Dwellers ( Recognition of Forest Rights ) Act, 2006, which seeks to recognize and vest the forest rights in forest land in forest dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers, extends the scope of community ownership of Minor Forest Produce within & outside village boundaries including access to collect, use, transport & sell the same, to all villages. The Act also confers, on the village community, the right to protect, regenerate or conserve or manage any community forest resource, which has been traditionally protected & conserved for sustainable use. It also confers, on the village community, the right pertaining to access to biodiversity & community right to intellectual property & traditional knowledge related to biodiversity & cultural diversity. However, the Act falls short of prescribing institutional arrangement for enjoying these community rights.
Page 9
Personal Views
Raising, preservation, improvement and regulation of the use of village forests and grazing lands, including lands assigned under Section 28 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The details of village forests, as given above, therefore, provide not only for the Reserved and Protected forests but also for lands set aside for grazing and forestry purposes under the Land Revenue Code. But for private forests, therefore, the above details incorporate a majority of suggestions made by Sir Howard for increasing the extent of forest. The 2003 amendment to the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, which is largely attributed to Shri Anna Hazare, resulted in incorporation of provisions for effective empowerment of Gram Sabhas. Section 49 and 49-Aof the Act concern constitution of Village Development and Beneficiary-level Committees of the Gram Sabha respectively. Clauses (1) to (9) of Section 49 deal with various issues pertaining to the Village Development Committees including their constitution, term, powers, duties and functions, membership, authority, annual accounts, proceedings of the committees, limitation on the powers, duties and functions of Panchayats with regard to these committees, appointment & removal of members of the committees and reconstitution of committees. Section 49-A of the Act provides for constitution etc. of Beneficiary Level Subcommittees. Such a committee may be constituted, in consultation with Panchayat, and with prior approval of the Gram Sabha, having regard to the geographical, geo-hydrological, technological, economic, social and demographic situation of the habitation within the area of the Panchayat, from amongst the voter beneficiaries of the existing or proposed activity, scheme or utility, exclusively serving a habitation. Section 51 of the Act authorises the State Government to vest, in a Panchayat, or resume, open sites, waste, vacant or grazing lands, ditches, dikes, river beds, tanks, streams, lakes, nallas, canals, water courses, trees etc. Chapter IV of the Act deals with Panchayat Property and Fund. Section 55 empowers a Panchayat to lease, sell and transfer movable or immovable property vested in it. Section 57 of the Act provides for setting up of Village Fund and lists the various sources of fund, which may be paid into or forming part of the said fund. These include, apart from others, the sale proceeds or royalty of the minor forest produce collected in the Scheduled Areas within the jurisdiction of a Panchayat and vested in that Panchayat, as well as sums contributed to the village fund by the State Government. Chapter V of the Act deals with Establishment, Budget and Accounts of Panchayats. Section 60 of the Act provides for appointment of one or more Secretaries of Panchayat. Sub-section (1) of Section 61 empowers a panchayat to appoint servants for proper discharge of duties under the Act. Sub-section (2) authorises the State Government to make rules to regulate recruitment and the terms and conditions of servants appointed under sub-section (1). Section 62 of the Act prescribes detailed procedure for operation of Budget and Accounts of Panchayats. A Village Water Supply Fund has been created, under Section 132-B of the Act. A similar action may be perceived for the forestry sector. A rational interpretation of the above provisions of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 read with Section 28 of The Indian Forest Act, 1927, therefore, provides clues for a comprehensive institutional mechanism, albeit after minor amendments, if need be, not
Page 10
Personal Views
only for management of village forests but also of all the natural resources occurring within the geographical limits of a village. It is really disheartening to note that such foresightedness shown by the Elected Representatives of our State has not been able to spur forest administration in the State to lead the way for pioneering the cause of such an advanced and legally sanctioned concept of Joint Forest Management in the country. Joint Forest Management continues to be rooted largely in the Arabari origins dating back to 1990 and driven by rather disjointed and often unrealistic set of miscellaneous executive instructions. Recently, attempt has been made to link Joint Forest Management to Panchayats, but it falls far short of providing a sustainable and complimentary institution for managing the vital and fast dwindling forest and biological resources at the village level.
Page 11
Personal Views
As per the SOFR ( 2009 ), which is based on the assessment of satellite data of October, 2006, the State has a the forest cover of 50650 sq. km. , which is 16.46% of the States geographical area. Increasingly subject to pressures of rising population and depleting funds, forest cover exists over 81.77% forest area. In terms of forest canopy density classes, very dense forest cover exist over 8739 sq. km. ( 14.11% of forest area ), moderately dense forest cover over 20834 sq. km. ( 33.63% ), open forest cover , including scrub, over 21077 sq km ( 34.03% ). As much as 18.23% of the recorded forest area is bereft of any tree cover and appears to be increasing with each assessment, notwithstanding the improved satellite resources / assessment techniques. We rank fourth, behind M.P., Arunachal Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, in terms of forest cover. As per the SOFR ( 2009 ), the seven hill districts in the State have a geographical area of 69905 sq km, which is the third largest after J&K and Arunachal Pradesh. The Report puts the forest cover in the hill districts of the State at 15,508 sq. km. or 22.18% of the geographical area of these districts. In terms of percentage forest cover in the hilly areas, Maharashtra ranks second from the bottom, higher only than J&K. It is indeed a matter of grave concern that only 10.8% of the hill area of the State supports adequate forest cover. The forest cover in the hills of the State being far lower than the National Forest Policy mandate of 60%, warrants immediate and resolute action, since hills form catchments of all the major rivers flowing in the State. Forest Department has divided the State into 15 ( including 4 Wildlife ) Circles, 65 ( including 8 Sub-divisions & 14 Wildlife Divisions ), 440 ( including 63 Wildlife ) Ranges, 1670 ( including 195 Wildlife ) Rounds and 6283 ( including 669 Wildlife ) Beats. This administrative division of forest landscapes is, by and large, at variance with the administrative entities created for State Administration. Natural resources, which prosper and perish in natural landscapes, need to be managed as per the felt needs of such landscapes. As per the All India Soil & Land Use Survey classification, Maharashtra States landscape is divisible into two Water Resource Regions viz., Easterly flowing River System and Westerly flowing River System. These regions have been further divided into six Basins viz., Godavari, Krishna, Tapi, Narmada, westerly flowing rivers and a small part of Gadchiroli district falling in the Mahanadi Basin. Each basin is divided, in turn, into Catchments, Sub-catchments and Watersheds. Accordingly, there are 16 Catchments, 74 Sub-catchments and 396 Watersheds in the State. The 1505 GSDA watersheds merge with the AISLUS system at the sub-watershed stage. However, for further classifying the watersheds down to the micro-watershed stage, the GSDA watersheds are further divided, by the Maharashtra Remore Sensing Applications Centre, into sub, mini and micro- watersheds. There are an estimated 60000 micro watersheds in the State. Management of natural, specially forest, resources suffers in such a complex web of often conflicting administrative / natural landscapes. With as much as 94% of the States geographical area subject to water induced soil erosion, the Stat loses about 773 million tonnes of top soil to water induced soil erosion annually, a bulk of which can be attributed to forest degradation in the upper slopes. Forests conservation is, therefore, crucial for the recovery of agricultural economy in the State which appears to be on the decline of late. The physiographic unit wise assessment of soil erosion in the State is as follows.
Page 12
Personal Views
S. No. Physiographic Unit Konkan Coast Geo. Area. covered 2,240,460 Severe Erosion *(%) 6,11,720 (27.3) 1,015,910 (53.1) 1,064,000 (18.7) 1,886,750 (11.5) 2,15,690 (6.4) 47,94,070 (16.2) Over 40 MT / ha /Yr. Strong Erosion *(%) 10,80,460 (48.2) 6,39,800 (33.4) 9,55,790 (16.8) 34,41,550 (20.9) 11,29,230 (33.5) 72,46,830 (24.4) 21-40 MT / ha / Yr. Moderate Erosion *(%) 3,48,060 (15.5) 2,57,420 (13.5) 35,38,820 (62.2) 10,610,570 (64.5) 18,47,340 (54.8) 16,602,210 (56.0) 11-20 MT / ha / Yr. Slight Erosion *(%) 2,00,200 (9.0) NIL
Western Ghats
1,913,130
Upper Maharashtra (Deccan Plateau) Lower Maharashtra (Deccan Plateau) Lower Maharashtra (Deccan Plateau) Metamorphic Maharashtra
5,686,040
1,27,430 (2.3) 5,04,650 (3.1) 1,76,240 (5.2) 10,08,54 0 (3.4) 5-10 MT / ha / Yr.
16,443,520
3,368,500
29,651,650
EROSION RATE
The land use statistics puts the extent of wastelands in the State at 70.6 lakh ha. Of this, community lands account for 28.73 lakh ha, private lands 24 lakh ha, and degraded forests for 17.8 lakh ha. The satellite based survey of non forest wastelands done by the Maharashtra Remote Sensing Applications Centre, on 1:250,000 scale in 1995, put the same at 51.15 lakh ha. There is thus an area of about 53 lakh ha under various categories of non forest wastelands in the State. The Forest Survey of India estimated, in 1999, that only 23.6 lakh ha of the State's forest area of 64 lakh ha contained adequate forest cover thereby indicating that over 40 lakh ha forest area in the State, supporting inadequate tree cover, was degraded. The total extent of wastelands in the State may, therefore, be as high as 93 lakh ha! The satellite based assessment of wasteland categories in the State published by the Ministry of Rural Development reveals that a majority, i.e. 53.13 percent of wastelands in the State are classified as uplands with or without scrub. This is further corroborated by the revelation in the State of Forest Report ( 2009 ) that the seven hill districts in the State contain only 22.18% tree cover as against sixty percent recommended by the National Forest Policy ( 1988 ). Together with degraded notified forest land, degraded pasture / grazing land, mining / industrial wastelands, barren / rocky / stony waste / sheet rock area, steep slopes, the bulk accounts for over sixty nine percent of the total geographic area of the State. The districts of Pune, Ratnagiri and Thane possess wastelands in excess of twenty five percent. Districts with twenty to twenty five percent wastelands include Yavatmal, Dhule, Ahmednagar, Nasik and Buldhana. The Satellite surveys also indicate that 63.6 percent
Page 13
Personal Views
private wastelands exist in the Pune and Konkan Revenue Divisions. Community wastelands are more evenly spread with the exception of Amravati Division. Degraded Forests are mostly encountered in Nasik and Nagpur Divisions, followed by Pune Division. Forest areas in the State, specially those located in the hills, play a crucial role in soil conservation and water management. The above table, read with the forest cover assessment ( SOFR 2009 ) is a revelation of how deforestation in the upper catchments affects natural landscape productivity. A somewhat similar situation is obtained when the ground water resource scenario in the State, is superimposed on the forest cover assessment. Increasing frequency of flash floods in Western Maharashtra and adjoining Karnataka can be attributed to the increasing loss of forest cover in the North Western Ghats. Loss of forest cover followed by erosion / compaction of surface in the catchments increases surface flows while reducing the recharge. Water has thus, become the major eroding force in State. It may be noted that the per capita water availability in the State is as low as 595 cubic meter / yr. The percentage of rural / urban households using firewood has been estimated at 68.94% and 10.81% respectively. At an average 1.5 kg firewood / person / day, Maharashtras household may be burning about 76100 Metric Tonnes of firewood / day, which means over 45600 trees being consigned to hearth / day! Providing energy for the kitchen, therefore, continues to be the main eco-destructive service, to which the States forests are being put to. No wonder, that, the consequences of this unrestricted onslaught on the natural greens are being felt with increasing regularity! In the summer of 2012, 15 of the 33 districts in the State are reeling under as acute shortage of water! Howards observations about role of forests in erosion control and amelioration of environment were so true and timely! The Nature is throwing enough hints for State to pull its socks pronto or else!
Page 14
Personal Views
Vide judgement dated 12th December, 1996, in Writ Petition ( Civil ) No. 202 of 1995, the Honble Supreme Court has made it mandatory to cover all forest areas under Working Plans duly approved by the Government of India. The said order was later expanded to ensure regeneration of worked areas and timely provision of funds for the same. The Honble Apex Court also ordered that any deviation to a Working Plan would require approval of the Regional Chief Conservator of Forests ( MOEF ) concerned. Accordingly, the Government of India prepared a detailed National Working Plan Code for preparation, approval, implementation and revision of Working Plans in the country. The Central Government exercises control over Working Plans through the Reginal CCF, specially to monitor the following points. Preparation of Working plan is in accordance with prescribed procedure, i.e., Consultations, Field Visits, First PWPR, Writing of Working Plan, Preparation / updating of maps, Writing / Editing of Compartment Histories and prescribing of Control Forms. The working plan prescriptions are being followed and the system of annual updating of Compartment Histories and Control Forms is in place. Harvesting does not exceed the natural regeneration. This can be monitored through field visits, reports, and money provided in the budget for plantations and silvicultural operations.
As regards Joint Forest Management, the Code makes the following provisions. Joint Forest Management is sharing of responsibilities, authority, and usufructs between the Village Community or the Forest User Group and the Forest Department on the basis of an agreement between the two. The management of the jointly managed forest is done through the provision of a micro-plan prepared by the community on PRA basis and with the technical help of the officials of Forest Department. Since the micro-plan is prepared with the technical guidance of Foresters, there are little chances of any conflict between the working plan and micro-plan prescriptions. Since Joint Forest Management is new and at evolving stage, it will not be wise to make any comment at this stage. Only thing which has to be ensured is that the micro-plan prescriptions do not violate the silvicultural prescriptions of the working plan specially those related to sustainable forest management and regulation of yield of major forest products. Approval of JFM micro-plan from Ministry of Environment and Forests is not necessary as they are covered by the macro level prescriptions of working plan of the Forest Division. Any deviation from the macro level prescriptions will require prior approval of the Regional CCF. As per official records, there are 14239 Joint Forest management Committees in the State, of which 12957 have been registered. The total membership of these JFMCs stands at 2658298. These Committees have been allotted 4140276.6 Ha, including 2942659.1 Ha of forests and 1197637.5 Ha of non forest area. These committees, therefore, have been allotted 53.15% of the forest area controlled by the Forest Department! The moot question is whether the technical prescriptions, being applied to the forest areas brought under JFM micro-plans, are in sync with provisions of approved working plans. Since the various miscellaneous executive instructions, issued for implementing the JFM in the State, do not provide detailed guidelines for technical management of these areas, there is need to sit up and immediately review the system being practised under the JFM set up.
Page 15
Personal Views
There is need to realise that the countrys forests have, for ages, been managed as per German forestry principles. Scientific management alternatives need to be discussed by expert panels in depth, put to field trials over sufficiently long periods and evaluated before being applied. The German system provides for conversions of forests from one management system to another. There has been a tendency, in the country, to simply withdraw existing silvicultural prescriptions without providing alternatives. Forests, put under Protected Areas, are a case in point. Even a cursory look at Wildlife management plans would reveal that silvicultural management has simply been withdrawn from such areas. The resultant reversal from a managed forest back to the Jungle may be causing unforeseen problems even for wildlife! How do the forests put under JFM micro-plans fit into the concept of maintaining the integrity of wildlife corridors? A majority of these posers can be better addressed under a legally mandated system of participatory management.
Page 16
Personal Views
Are any other categories of non forest commons available within the village boundary? If yes, what is the extent of the same, village wise? Legal issues in assignment of any or all the above areas to the Panchayat as village forests.
Issues Relating to Village Administration Review of Panchayats, including Block Panchayats, in the State and grouping of the 43,711 Villages into the same. Constitution of a Development Committee of the Gram Sabha for Village Forest Management. Membership of the Village Forest Management Committee ( VFMC ). Legal issues involved in the appointment of Forester / Forest Guard as Secretary of VFMC. Creation of Beneficiary level committees for Forest Rights, Biodiversity Management, Appointment of servants of the VFMC. Budget, accounts and audit procedure for VFMC. Funding of VFMC. The various sources may include, Outlay ( non plan ) for Working Plans, Grants under Finance Commission, Plan funds for Joint Forest Management including CSS, Plan funds for watershed development, Grants from Forest Revenue to the Zilla Parishads, Forest Development Tax, Plan funds for Social forestry / Agro-forestry, EGS / MREGS, CAMPA and any other existing / new programmes / schemes. Other VFMC Fund receipts from sale of community forest resources, levies, taxes, fines, fees, contributions from Government / Non Government Organisations etc. Creation of institutional mechanism for and legal issues involved in the disposal of MFP ( including bamboo and tendu ) etc. ( may be, on the lines of M.P, Chhatisgarh ) and usufruct sharing with regard to other forest produce. Alternate mechanism to replace the FLCS by creation of a suitable institution under the Panchayat.
Page 17
Personal Views
Forest Management by Panchayats Formulation of rules for regulating the management of village forests, prescribing the
conditions under which the VFMCs may be provided with timber or other forest produce or pasture, and their duties for the protection and improvement of such forest. Formulation of guidelines for preparation of micro-plans for scientific management of village forests as per prescriptions of approved working plan. Drafting Notification to the effect that the provisions of The Indian Forest Act / Land Revenue Code relating to reserved or protected forests / lands assigned for grazing, forest etc. shall, so far as they are not inconsistent with the rules so made, apply to village forests accordingly as the forests assigned are reserved or protected forests / revenue lands assigned as above. Formulation of guidelines for preparation and maintenance of biodiversity registers and other issues relating to biodiversity management at the village level. Formulation of guidelines and procedure for creation of Self Help Groups. Formulation of guidelines for management of micro-watersheds in village forests.
Personal Views
Municipal Corporation is ill-equipped to live up to the new challenges. An Urban Forestry Wing for Creation and maintenance of urban forests under Local Self Government needs to be conceived. Arrangements suggested for village forests may be replicated in urban areas after bringing about necessary legal changes.
To Sum UP
Although, is hard to change with times, but the wise always find ways and means to do so. The writing on the wall was never so apparent! To perform NOW is the necessary imperative or else, the only other option is to perish! Forest Conservation is a cause fit enough to work for without being overawed by the enormity of paradigm shift in the working milieu! Participatory management of scarce natural resources such as forests is the way forward for Foresters to become agents of positive change. That forests play a vital role in climate control, is understood better than ever before. There is, therefore need to take the message to the rural commons and make forest conservation a common cause with people at large.
Page 19