Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Goal:
The goal of the SIP Quarterly Review process is to increase academic outcomes for ALL students with particular attention to closing the achievement gap.
Purpose:
SIP QR #1 will provide a discussion framework for answering the following questions: Where are we now? Where are we going? How will we get there? How will we monitor progress?
Emphases:
Share our plan for the year (SIP) Identify challenges and opportunities for additional support Ask and answer questions regarding SIP
Mission: The mission of Olson is to create a culture that will instill in our students the intellectual, social and personal habits of mind necessary for success in college. We are a 6-8 grade school that offers a learning environment where students are the center of academic achievement as well as personal development that teaches students how to have lifelong learning and success. Vision: Every student college-ready
Principal: Karon Cunningham Assistant Principal: Evelyn Kimble Assistant Principal Intern: Bart Johnson Instructional Facilitator: Jeff Wendelberger Math Coach: Cheryl Tucker ILT Grade-level representatives Special Education Faculty English Language Learner Teacher Mental Health Professionals Support Staff
Gender Racial & Ethnic Groups Socioeconomic Status Special Education Status English Learners Status Students Home Language
9%
African American
American Indian
14% 3% 72%
Socioeconomic Status Based on Free & Reduced Lunch Count, 2013-2014 (N=346)
5%
95%
Students Receiving Special Education Services vs. Students Not Receiving Special Education Services, 2013-2104 (N=346)
Communication Stakeholders Staff Survey Results Summary Tripod Student Surveys 2012-2013 Climate Goals Meeting Climate Goals Attendance & Engagement Students: Behavioral referrals, removals, suspensions
The number of student receiving suspensions at Olson Middle School will decrease by 30% from 2013 to 2014 and an additional 20% in 2015. The number of African American students who are suspended at Olson Middle School will decrease by 30% from 2013 to 2014 and an additional 20% in 2015.
Strengths:
Weekly JAM Sessions Monthly Staff Meetings Collaborative Team Meetings Weekly Content PLCs Weekly PBIS Meeting to review data (representatives from grade levels, specialist, special education, ELL, support staff, and Check & Connect) Parent Conferences with grade level teams and support staff Relationship building (gender based groups, staff mentoring, and Cargill e-mentoring) Student recognitions (attendance, academic, behavior, and sports) New teachers assigned building teacher mentors
Challenges:
Teacher turnover (new teachers to the building; the entire 7th
grade is new) Two new support staff (7th grade team without assigned grade level behavior support for 1 month, as of October 18, 2013) Unfilled positions (new SERT, math, Specialist (due to teacher going to District office)). Integrating students from Cityview, Charter, Day Treatment Programs, JDC and SPAN into Olsons culture Multiple students with mental health issues (treated and untreated) Gang conflicts
2010). All teachers and behavior support staff will receive training to develop school-wide common strategies to:
build relationships teach expectations manage classrooms
Number of Students
2% 0% 14%
1% 9%
American Indian American Indian
Asian
Asian
3%
72%
Latino
Latino
99%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
White
The number of students with 95% attendance is up from the previous two years. 93 students have received one or more referrals this school-year Racial disproportionalities exist in number of behavioral incidents:
African American students are over-represented by 27% Asian students are under-represented by 14% American Indian students are under-represented by 3% Latino students are under-represented by 2% White students are under-represented by 8%
Strengths:
Collaboration with SSW, Attendance SSPA and Check & Connect
staff (Attendance Team) Daily check-ins with students and Attendance Team) Home visits Phone Calls (Robo-calls and Attendance Team staff) Three-Day absence letters Contracts with students
Challenges:
Inaccurate data (Discovery reserve teachers) Missing or inaccurate and lack of current contact information
(after repeated attempts to obtain) New Discovery training not currently available to attendance team staff (District waiting for Discovery update) Transportation (buses not picking up students, new drivers not aware of routes)
Strengths: Returning teachers (6/15) are familiar with and have used Data Team cycles ELA and Math use MAP and MCA data to differentiate and focus instruction ELA and Math professional development is responsive to staff/student needs
Challenges: Uniformity of data use across all content areas. Reading and math use MAP and MCA data; Social Studies and science are in the process of implementing the Data Team cycle. Key Actions: Bart Johnson to facilitate Science PLC. Evelyn Kimble to co-facilitate Social Studies PLC Whole school PLCs around AVID Critical Reading and SOEI.
Monitoring: ILT, and math, science, and ELA PLCs. Data team results are shared in team meetings.
2
0
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
Strengths:
Scope & Sequence: teachers are aligning instructional pacing with curriculum
guides. Learning Targets: teachers consistently communicate and make visible (20122013 Tripod Survey Consolidate was 60% (exceeded District average)). Formative Assessments: most teachers are using the benchmark assessments Differentiation: The ELA/ESL collaboration at all grade levels to align programs; Focus math classes. Analysis and Response: Most content/grade-level teams utilize assessments to inform team planning. (Long classes)
Challenges:
10/10 teachers in FI grades are new to district and/or new to FI. Teachers are challenged of following grade level expectations and providing
Key Actions: Schedule includes 2 Long sections of ELA and Math to address foundational skills instruction. Monitoring: Benchmark tests in PLCs. Needs for Support: Training for teachers who are not trained (substitutes for FI days).
10:15-11:15
Elective Focus
10:15-11:30
Long
Enrich.
10:15 - 11:30
Long
Enrich.
11:15-12:07
Short
11:30-12:25
Elective Focus
11:30-12:00
Lunch
12:07 - 1:00
Short
12:25 - 12:55
Lunch
12:00-12:52
Short
1:00 -1:30
LUNCH
1:00-2:15
Long
Reading
12:52-1:45
Short
1:30 - 2:45
Long
Enrich.
2:15 - 3:05
Short
1:45-2:45
Elective Focus
2:45 - 4:00
Long
Reading
3:05-4:00
Short
2:45 - 4:00
Long
Reading
MMR increased from 24.40% in 2012 to 26.44% in 2013. FR increased from 28.15% in 2012 to 33.78% in 2013.
Note the inverse relationship between MMR and FRPL with Olson as the exception.
Note the inverse relationship between Focus Rating and FRPL with Olson as the exception.
Mathematics
90
80 70 60 50 40 African American American Indian
Asian
Latino White
30
20 10 0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Olson students performed below the State and District averages in math proficiency on the MCA Olson students performed ~20% lower than their MPS peers on the MAP one-years growth metric Asian students performed higher than the District average for one-years growth Asian students performed the highest in both proficiency and growth On MCA proficiency, there was a racial achievement gap between students:
39% of Asian students were proficient 33% of American Indian students were proficient 28% of White students were proficient 22% of African American students were proficient Cell size for Latino students was too small to report (N=5)
The percent of all students in all grades tested who earn achievement levels of Meets the Standards or Exceeds the Standards on the Math MCA-III at Olson Middle School will increase from 17 % in 2013 to 30% in 2014 and to 45% in 2015.
Weekly Professional Learning Communities Teacher observations with feedback (Math Coach) Data team cycles/common assessments uncover student strengths and foundational needs 2 Math teachers per grade level allow for small class sizes and individualized instruction 2 Long Periods allow for foundational skill instruction Extended day programs will focus on building mathematical strategies and competencies (the data from Data team cycles will determine the strategies)
Reading
90
80 70 60 50 40 African American American Indian
Asian
Latino White
30
20 10 0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
100
Percent of Students Reading in the Red Zone
90
80 70 60 50 40 Olson Anthony Anwatin Northeast Ramsey Sanford
30
20 10 0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Olson students performed 35% below the State and 18% below District averages in reading proficiency on the MCA Olson students performed 13% lower than their MPS peers on the MAP oneyears growth metric American Indian students and students in Special Education performed higher than the District average for one-years growth American Indian students performed the highest in both proficiency and growth On MCA proficiency, there was a racial achievement gap between students:
34% of American Indian students were proficient 33% of White students were proficient 31% of Asian students were proficient 23% of African American students were proficient Cell size for Latino students was too small to report (N=5)
The percent of All Students in all grades tested who earn achievement levels of Meets the Standards or Exceeds the Standards on the Reading MCA-III at Olson Middle School will increase from 18 % in 2013 to 30% in 2014 and to 45% in 2015.
Weekly PLCs (Data Team Cycles) Common Core Professional Development Conscious creation of a literacy culture 4 days per week leveled reading strategy instruction 20-minutes of self-selected reading per day (IMGREATT) AVID Critical Reading Strategies school-wide 20 minutes of reading at home per night Extended day programs incorporate comprehension strategies 2 Long periods allow for foundational skill instruction
Strengths:
ELA/EL collaboration EL teacher collaboratively plans
and co-teaches with each grade level ELA teacher School-wide teaching of Tier II vocabulary through Word of the Day Professional Development in PLCs on Academic Language provided by the EL teacher
Challenges:
Finding collaborative time Keeping up with the FI pacing and teaching (based on the
Key Actions:
Master Schedule has been designed to facilitate ELA/EL
co-teaching and Word of the Day vocabulary instruction Utilize curriculum guides in Focused Instruction that focuses on academic and content language
Monitoring: Data team cycles monitor use of academic language Needs for Support: Availability of Reserve Teachers to allow opportunities to attend Professional Development training
Strengths:
Diversity of approaches to engage families (AVID, Get
Ready, Beacons, CPEO, Project Success, Family Nights, sporting events) Diversity in language and culture of our families (Hmong New Year, Black History)
Challenges:
Transportation Families whose students are struggling the most are
the ones that we see the least and have the most difficulty involving in their childs education
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
120 100
80
60 40 20
0
Fall 2012 Fall 2013
0
Fall 2012 Fall 2013
Key Actions:
Personal phone inviting parents to conferences and school
events Phone calls to build relationships and to provide positive feedback on academic and behavior improvement. Team conferencing with parents for readmit meetings and to address academic and behavior concerns. Quarterly family nights Parent Training (Parent Portal and CPEO) Invite families to student performances and student recognition programs. Computer give-away Grade Level competitions Robo-calls in two languages (English and Hmong)
Monitoring:
Parents sign-in/sign-up Parent surveys Verbal feedback
employment, housing, training, community challenges, drug/alcohol addictions, mental health) Families and community have access to wrap around services to meet the social, emotional, psychological and health needs of our students