Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
TECHNICAL NOTE1
The transistor is also housed in the new M02 package (see Figure 6) which is optimized for high gain with its two emitter leads, good thermal dissipation and a sizable collector pad. In the band of operation, this device exhibits sufficient gain at the high end (12 dB up to 900 MHz) when biased at 10 V, 50 mA, while also providing a minimum of 23 dBm for one dB compression point (P1dB). Since the power performance is well above the specified requirement, a linear simulation was chosen to optimize the other design parameters. Broadband Match The purpose of designing a broadband amplifier is to synthesize an input and output matching network to the device that will achieve the desired transducer power gain (refer to Table 2 and Figure 1 for the NE461M02 S-Parameters and maximum available gain (MAG)). Since the device has a naturally sloped response of 6 dB/octave (Figure 2), these networks will have to compensate for the roll-off of the transistor within the passband. In this case, the design also requires a very good return loss, therefore simply mismatching the device will not allow the amplifier to meet the specifications. The final topology adopted (Figure 3) was a matching that combines three different design techniques to achieve the desired bandwidth (over a 1 to 10 ratio). The design includes series feedback on the emitter, parallel feedback from the collector to the base, and lossy matching networks both on the input and the output. The series feedback is used to offset the internal package feedback, bring unconditional stability at lower frequencies (below 500 MHz) and reduce the gain slope below 1 GHz. Once the 5 ! resistive emitter feedback was applied, a flat gain over the band could easily be fine-tuned using the parallel feedback. However, meeting the desired return loss performance involved considerable design efforts and could only be achieved with a lossy network (which may affect the linear behavior of the device). In the simulation, all design parameters were eventually met (Figures 4 and 5, Table 3) except for the power parameters, which were not simulated. However, with a bias of 10 V, 50 mA, the amplifier would have to run below 10% efficiency to not meet the power specifications. Finally, stability was optimized with K (Stability factor) close to 1 in and around the active band. The circuit was simulated up to 4 GHz with good stability results.
1.5 dB 1.0 dB Peak to Peak Peak to Peak 17dBm -10 min. -12 min. Not Simulated -10 min. up to 550 MHz -12 min. up to 900 MHz N/A
(mA) 10 V, 50 mA 10 V, 50 mA (US $) $1
Table 1. Maximum Gain Design Performance Comparison: Goals and Simulation. The device chosen for this design is the NE461M02, a NPN silicon epitaxial bipolar transistor specially designed for medium power and high dynamic range applications.
Note: 1. Technical notes are proof of concepts based on CEL's device characterization and simulations to provide RF and microwave engineers with a starting point for their designs.
(K
K 2- 1
2 2 2 |S21| , K = 1 + | | - |S11| - |S22| , = S11 S22 - S21 S12 |S12| 2 |S12 S21|
.8 .6 .4
Maximum Available Gain, MAG (dB) Insertion Power Gain, IS21I (dB)
1.5 2 3
30
GMAG
25
.2
4 5 10 20
20
.2
.4
.6
.8
1.5
4 5
10 20
-5 -4 -3 -2 -.6
GMAG
-.4
VCE = 10 V, IC = 50 mA
-.8
-1
-1.5
.2
.4
.6 .8 1
TN1031
DATA MSUB MSUB1 ER = 4.74 H = 62 T = 0.15 RHO = 0.70 RGH = 2.00e-03 COND1 = cond COND2 = cond2 DIEL1 = diel DIEL2 = diel2 HOLE = hole RES= resi RES MLIN R2 TL1 R = R feed W = 10 L = L feed Collect S2P SNP2 FILE = 461mo21e IND L5 L = Lin Base 1 CAP C1 C = cin Base 1 MLIN TL2 W = 10 L = L feed Base MLIN TL5 W = 10 L = Lout Match
PORT P1 port = 1
PORT P2 port = 2
RES R3 R = R Source
RES R1 R = Rout
Var. Eqn. VAR Lout Shunt = 11 Line output = 2100 Line input = 2500 Lin Base 1 = 6 Lin Base 2 = 10 cin Base 1 = 7 cin Base 2 = 3 L feed Collect = 1000 L feed Base = 20 Lout Match = 350 Lin Shunt = 1100 Rin Shunt = 400 Lout Series 1 = 3.50 Lout Series 2 = 10 Lout Series 3 = 4 cout Series 1 = 6 cout Series 2 = 3.50 Rout = 500 R feed = 250 R Source = 5
15
1 .5 2
Input Return Loss, IS11I (dB) Output Return Loss, IS22I (dB)
.2
.2
.5
-.2
-5
-.5 -1 IS11I
-2
IS22I
TN1031
4.50.1 1.60.2
1.50.1
not very sensitive to bias changes in terms of gain and return loss. Along with the consistency of the NE461M02, this should be a key parameter to ensuring ease of manufacturability. Additionally, some inductive elements were simulated using a 10 mil wide printed line to allow for tuning once the design is released to manufacturing. These lines should be laid out in a U-shape to vary the length by adding or cutting connecting traces, assisting with minor production tuning. However, chips inductors were used for the input and output matching filters since the values of such inductors would make printed line length impracticable for use at low frequencies. Conclusion This technical note describes the design process of a wideband medium power amplifier for high volume commercial applications using the NE461M02. Some insights on design considerations that address both performance and ease of manufacturability were exposed. Finally the simulation results provide the expected performance and proposed topology of the circuit.
E
0.8 MIN
0.42 0.06
3.950.26
2.450.1
0.250.02
Figure 6. M02 Package. Additional Design Features In addition to exceeding the minimum specifications, a sensitivity study was performed to verify the robustness and repeatability of the design. S-Parameter files with different bias points were simulated to demonstrate that the design is