Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • EigenFace Fisherface

    Загружено:

    amkhan1971
    117 просмотров10 страниц
    This document compares and evaluates two approaches for facial recognition - Eigenfaces and Fisherfaces. It uses the Yale Face Database, divided into subsets with varying lighting conditions, to test the two approaches. The Eigenface method uses principal component analysis to extract feature vectors from face images for recognition. The Fisherface method uses linear discriminant analysis to select features that best discriminate between different people. The document finds that the Fisherface approach has a lower error rate than Eigenfaces, especially when testing images with different lighting conditions than the training set, indicating it is better at generalization to new data.

    Исходное описание:

    Overview of Bellhuemer paper on Eigen Face and Fisher Face.

    Авторское право

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Доступные форматы

    DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    This document compares and evaluates two approaches for facial recognition - Eigenfaces and Fisherfaces. It uses the Yale Face Database, divided into subsets with varying lighting conditions, to test the two approaches. The Eigenface method uses principal component analysis to extract feature vectors from face images for recognition. The Fisherface method uses linear discriminant analysis to select features that best discriminate between different people. The document finds that the Fisherface approach has a lower error rate than Eigenfaces, especially when testing images with different lighting conditions than the training set, indicating it is better at generalization to new data.

    Авторское право:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Скачайте в формате DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    117 просмотров10 страниц

    EigenFace Fisherface

    Загружено:

    amkhan1971
    This document compares and evaluates two approaches for facial recognition - Eigenfaces and Fisherfaces. It uses the Yale Face Database, divided into subsets with varying lighting conditions, to test the two approaches. The Eigenface method uses principal component analysis to extract feature vectors from face images for recognition. The Fisherface method uses linear discriminant analysis to select features that best discriminate between different people. The document finds that the Fisherface approach has a lower error rate than Eigenfaces, especially when testing images with different lighting conditions than the training set, indicating it is better at generalization to new data.

    Авторское право:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Скачайте в формате DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 10

    Eigenfaces vs.

    Fisherfaces
    By

    Abdul Malik Khan

    INTRODUCTION
    Facial recognition is a problem of automatically identifying or verifying a person from a digital image For the given paper the problem is: Given a set of face images labeled with the persons identity (the learning set) and an unlabeled set of face images from the same group of people (the test set), identify each person in the test images.

    Methods
    In this paper, following four pattern classification techniques for solving the face recognition problem are studied Correlation Eigenface Linear Subspace Fisherface

    Face images database


    To implement the paper, yale cropped database is downloaded3 Database contains varied light source location of 38 persons, database is divided into 5 subsets Subset 1: Light source is 0~15 off camera axis [6 images] Subset 2: Light source is 15~30 off camera axis [10 images] Subset 3: Light source is 30~45 off camera axis [4 images] Subset 4: Light source is 45~60 off camera axis [7 images] Subset 5: Light source is 60~75 off camera axis [4 images]
    The data-base images are given in appendix-A

    EXPERIMENTS
    Variation in Lighting Extrapolation Interpolation Variation in Facial Expression, Eye Wear, and Lighting Full face Closely cropped face Not Done due to time constraints

    Extrapolation
    Each method was trained on samples from Subset 11 and then tested using samples from Subsets 1, 2, and 32. Since there are 190 images in the training set, correlation is equivalent to the Eigenface method using 189 principal components. Next Figure shows the result from this experiment.

    Extrapolation Results
    Extrpolation Results 1 Correlation Eigen Face - 4 Eigen Face - 10 Eigen Face - 4 (wo-3) Eigen Face - 10 (wo-3) Fisher Face - 10 (wo-3)

    0.9

    0.8

    0.7

    0.6

    Error Rate

    0.5

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8 2 2.2 Subset 1 - 2 - 3

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    25 PCA Weights

    Subset 1 contains 228 images for which both the longitudinal and latitudinal angles of light source direction are within 15 of the camera axis, 38 images are used as test sets
    2

    To test the methods with an image from Subset 1, that image was removed from the training set, i.e. the leaving-one-out strategy was employed

    25 Fisher Weights

    Eigen Values magnitude

    10

    Eigen values magnitude for Eigen Face

    10

    Magnitude (dB)

    10

    -5

    10

    -10

    10

    -15

    50

    100 Eigen Values

    150

    200

    250

    10

    10

    Eigen values magnitude for Fisher Discriminator, Negetive values are in Red

    10

    10

    Magnitude (dB)

    10

    -5

    10

    -10

    10

    -15

    10

    -20

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100 Eigen Values

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    Interpolation
    Each method was trained on samples from Subset 1 & 53 and then tested using samples from Subsets 2, 3 and 4. Next Figure shows the result from this experiment.

    25 PCA Weights

    25 Fisher Weights

    Subset 1 contains 228 images for which both the longitudinal and latitudinal angles of light source direction are within 15 of the camera axis, Subset 5 contains 152 images for which effective longitudinal and latitudinal angles of light source direction are between 60 and75 of the camera axis

    Interpolation Results
    Interpolation Results 0.9 0.8

    0.7 Correlation Eigen Face - 4 Eigen Face - 10 Eigen Face - 4 (wo-3) Eigen Face - 10 (wo-3) Fisher Face - 10 (wo-3) Fisher Face - 25 (wo-3)

    0.6

    Error Rate

    0.5

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3 3.2 Group 2 - 3 - 4

    3.4

    3.6

    3.8

    Eigen Values magnitude

    10

    Eigen values magnitude

    10

    10

    10

    -2

    Magnitude (dB)

    10 10

    -4

    -6

    10

    -8

    10

    -10

    10

    -12

    10

    -14

    50

    100

    150

    200 Eigen Values

    250

    300

    350

    400

    10

    10

    Eigen values magnitude for Fisher Discriminator, Negetive values are in Red

    10

    10

    Magnitude (dB)

    10

    -5

    10

    -10

    10

    -15

    10

    -20

    50

    100

    150 Eigen Values

    200

    250

    300

    350

    Comments on results References


    M. Turk and A. Pentland, Eigenfaces for Recognition, J. Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 1, 1991. http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~cdecoro/eigenfaces/ http://vision.ucsd.edu/extyaleb/CroppedYaleBZip/CroppedYale.zip

    Group-1

    Group 2

    Group 3

    Group 4

    Group 5

    Вам также может понравиться