Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ECONOMICAL
RELIABLE
EASY TO USE
100%
110%
140%
170%
200%
Xbloc
Application of Xbase
De
Construction stage
1 Technical support 2 Quality control 3 Mould drawings 4 Placement drawings
Easy to produce
St
Easy to store
St
Easy to place
Xbloc is registered trademark and world wide patents are applicable. To use Xbloc please contact Delta Marine Consultants.
Delt
Design
1 Advic
2 Conce
3 Revie
4 Guida 5 Hire
6 Execu
Eas
Eas
Eas
Xbloc i
Breakwater Port Oriel, Ireland Breakwater Caladh Mor, Ireland Breakwater Swinoujscie, Poland Breakwater Poti, Georgia Breakwater, Caspian Sea Breakwater, Gulf Region Offshore islands, U.A.E. Das Island, U.A.E. Breakwater Dikkowita, Sri Lanka
2011
Hydraulic stability
Excellent hydraulic stability: For concept design a KD value [stability coefficient in the Hudson formula] of 16 [trunk section] and 13 [head section] should be applied; The stability coefficient of the Xbloc is the same for breaking and non-breaking waves; Xbloc has a safety margin of at least 20% without damage to the armour layer. Automatic interlocking: Xbloc units naturally find a stable position on the slope; Self repairing of the Xbloc armour layer after damage is enhanced by automatic interlocking; The Xbloc unit is simple to place as no specific orientation of the individual units is required. Low wave overtopping: The highly porous armour layer minimises wave overtopping.
16 0 1 5 10 32 48 Stability coefficient, KD 150 200
Th
20 30
50 75 100
3 2.8
6 Hs Dn
Structural integrity
Failure
The structural integrity of the Xbloc was evaluated by using: Prototype drop tests [The Netherlands, Ireland and Georgia]; Finite element calculations [FE].
All studies and project experience show that the Xbloc is a structurally strong unit able to cope with the loads that can be expected during its lifetime from manufacture to operation. Ordinary concrete C25/30 can be used for the production of Xbloc armour units.
Ta
FE stress analysis
Xb
Construction aspects
Production
Steel moulds can be used repetitively to produce large numbers of units. Various mould designs have been developed, consisting of 2 sections. The moulds are either vertically or horizontally assembled. Moulds on wheels or rails can be applied. Casting is easy because of large fill openings. At the construction yard the Xbloc units can be handled with the aid of a fork, clamp or a sling. The units can be stored in various ways, for example side by side in a half-brick bond. The storage pattern can be arranged in 1 or 2 layers, depending upon the capacity of the subsoil. Using this pattern, the required storage area amounts to 0.72 D2 for 1 layer storage and 0.36 D2 for 2 layer storage [D = unit height]. Xbloc units can be handled in the storage yard by a fork.
Xb
Th
Placement
Placing Xbloc units and Xbase units can be executed in different manners. The Xbloc and Xbase units can be placed by an excavator or a crawler crane, equipped with either a sling, clamp or grab. It is also possible to cast a hole in the nose of the Xbase, and lift it with a rod through the hole. To achieve the correct packing density a random orientation is required. Based on several projects the placement rate of Xbloc armour units lies between 8 25 units/hour.
] and 13
fillet r = D/19
nt, KD
a D
/3
D/3
D/3 D
D/3
00
Hs Dn
Front view
Side/top view
Slope
c w
KD
3V : 4H 2400 kg/m3 = concrete density 1030 kg/m3 = water density 16 For breakwater head sections armour units are 25% heavier than for trunk section [KD=13]
Rock toe
4 3
Xbase
h er ay f rL u o rm A c r lo ye Xb La er d Core Un
with the
25/30
V=
2.77
3
Hs
;=
D= 3V
ve been
h = 0.97 D
oulds on
Unit volume Design wave height V [m3] 0.75 1 1.5
ard the
Unit height Unit weight Thickness of armour layer D [m] 1.31 1.44 1.65 1.82 1.96 2.08 2.29 2.47 2.62 2.76 2.88 3.00 3.11 3.30 3.48 3.63 3.78 3.91 W [t] 1.8 2.4 3.6 4.8 6.0 7.2 9.6 12.0 14.4 16.8 19.2 21.6 24.0 28.8 33.6 38.4 43.2 48.0 h [m] 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.8 N [1/100m2] 70.03 57.81 44.12 36.42 31.38 27.79 22.94 19.77 17.51 15.80 14.45 13.36 12.45 11.03 9.95 9.10 8.42 7.85 [m3/m2] 0.53 0.58 0.66 0.73 0.78 0.83 0.92 0.99 1.05 1.11 1.16 1.20 1.25 1.32 1.39 1.46 1.52 1.57 Packing density Concrete Placement Placement Porosity volume distance horizontal Dx [m] 1.73 1.90 2.18 2.40 2.58 2.75 3.02 3.26 3.46 3.64 3.81 3.96 4.10 4.36 4.59 4.80 4.99 5.17 distance up-slope Dy [m] 0.83 0.91 1.04 1.14 1.23 1.31 1.44 1.55 1.65 1.74 1.82 1.89 1.96 2.08 2.19 2.29 2.38 2.47 Rock Thickness under layer f [%] 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 [t] 0.06-0.3 0.06-0.3 0.3-1.0 0.3-1.0 0.3-1.0 0.3-1.0 0.3-1.0 1.0-3.0 1.0-3.0 1.0-3.0 1.0-3.0 1.0-3.0 1.0-3.0 1.0-3.0 3.0-6.0 3.0-6.0 3.0-6.0 3.0-6.0 [m] 0.8 0.8 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 of armour grading for layer under layer
ous ways,
depen-
2 D2 for
Hs [m] 3.35 3.69 4.22 4.65 5.01 5.32 5.86 6.31 6.70 7.06 7.38 7.67 7.95 8.44 8.89 9.29 9.67 10.01
e storage
2 2.5 3 4 5
also
6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20
Before using this table please check Guidelines for Xbloc Concept Designs, on our website www.xbloc.com
Delta Marine Consultants H. J. Nederhorststraat 1 P.O. Box 268 2800 AG Gouda The Netherlands T +31 182 590 610 E xbloc@xbloc.com, dmc@dmc.nl
Delta Marine Consultants Pte. Ltd (Singapore Branch) 6001 Beach Road #20-03 Golden Mile Tower Singapore 199589 T +65 62 943 033 E xbloc@xbloc.com, dmc@dmc.nl
www.dmc.nl www.xbloc.com
xbloc