Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 18
 
219476
No. SCWC-12-0000266
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIIMARK C. KELLBERG,Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,vs.CHRISTOPHER J. YUEN in his capacity asthe Planning Director, County of Hawaii,and COUNTY OF HAWAII,Respondents/Defendants-Appellees. ____________________________________ ))))))))))))ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OFCERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATECOURT OF APPEALSICA Opinion: June 20, 2013ICA Judgment: July 19, 2013Circuit Court:Civil No. 07-1-0157Circuit Court of the Third CircuitHon. Glenn S. Hara, Hon. Ronald IbarraJudgment: Feb. 28, 2012
APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARIAPPENDICES 1-4CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
ROBERT H. THOMAS 4610-0MARK M. MURAKAMI 7342-0DAMON KEY LEONG KUPCHAK HASTERT1003 Bishop Street, 16th Floor Honolulu, Hawaii 96813(808) 531-8031
www.hawaiilawyer.com
Attorneys for Petitioner/Plaintiff-AppellantMARK C. KELLBERG
Electronically FiledSupreme CourtSCWC-12-000026617-SEP-201312:07 PM
 
219476
No. SCWC-12-0000266
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIIMARK C. KELLBERG,Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,vs.CHRISTOPHER J. YUEN in his capacity asthe Planning Director, County of Hawaii,and COUNTY OF HAWAII,Respondents/Defendants-Appellees. ____________________________________ ))))))))))))ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OFCERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATECOURT OF APPEALSICA Opinion: June 20, 2013ICA Judgment: July 19, 2013Circuit Court:Civil No. 07-1-0157Circuit Court of the Third CircuitHon. Glenn S. Hara, Hon. Ronald IbarraJudgment: Feb. 28, 2012
APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 
219476
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage
Table of Authorities.....................................................................................................................iiIndex to Appendices ..................................................................................................................ivAPPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI....................................................................1QUESTIONS PRESENTED........................................................................................................21. Final Decision......................................................................................................22. Due Process Notice..............................................................................................2PRIOR PROCEEDINGS AND STATEMENT OF THE CASE.................................................2ARGUMENT...............................................................................................................................4I. THE DIRECTOR’S OCTOBER 2006 LETTER WAS NOT A FINAL DECISIONSUPPLANTING THE FINAL DECISION APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION 15MONTHS EARLIER.......................................................................................................51. BOA’s Jurisdiction Limited To “Final” Decisions..............................................52. There Can Be Only One “Final” Decision Approving A Subdivision................63. The Director Has No Power To Reconsider Final Decisions..............................3II. DUE PROCESS REQUIRED NOTIFICATION OF THE SHORT APPEAL FUSE.....81. BOA’s Short Limitations Period........................................................................102. Kellberg’s Property Interests ............................................................................113. Minimal Agency Burden ...................................................................................11CONCLUSION..........................................................................................................................12

Вознаградите свое любопытство

Все, что вы хотели прочитать.
Когда угодно. Где угодно. На любом устройстве.
Без обязательств. Отменить можно в любой момент.
576648e32a3d8b82ca71961b7a986505