ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND MARKING RUBRIC Leadership Reflection: Participation and Reflection (10%) Assessment 3 Leadership Learning Reflection

10% Assessment Criteria The writing should demonstrate a genuine and thoughtful reflection on personal learning outcomes from the course, and effectively convey the students experience to the reader. Assessment Rubric
Unsatisfactory (F) 0 - 2 Functional(P) 2.75 Proficient (C) 3.25 Advanced (D) 4 Outstanding (HD) 5 Depth of reflection Response shows no evidence of synthesis of ideas presented or of any insight gained through course. Very little or no attention is paid to implications for students ongoing leadership development. Response shows some evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained through the course though may be repetitive and mechanical. An attempt is made to present the implications of these insights for students leadership development. Response shows adequate evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the course. The implications of these insights for the students leadership development are presented clearly. Response shows clear evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the course. The implications of these insights for the students leadership development are clearly presented and appear genuine. Response demonstrates strong evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the course. The implication of these insights for students leadership development are detailed and genuine /5 Marks

Written expression

Uses language that is unsuitable for the audience and purpose, and/or little or no attention paid to structuring the reflection for the reader. Reader may focus more on errors rather than content.

Uses language that may be vague or imprecise for the audience or purpose, with little sense of voice, and a limited attempt at structure. Nonetheless overall meaning is comprehensible.

Uses appropriate language, with a basic sense of voice, some awareness of audience and purpose and a reasonable attempt at structure. Meaning is clear.

Uses language that is fluent and original, with evident sense of voice, awareness of audience and purpose, and a logical structure. Meaning is very clear.

Uses stylistically sophisticated language that is precise and engaging, notable sense of voice, awareness of audience and purpose and well- structured organisation of ideas and content. Total

/5

/10

DIPP1111 / Leadership Discussion Forums: Participation and Reflection / Summer 20132014

Page 1