CBAPTER 2 ESSAY Q0ESTI0NS Answei each of the following essay questions. Be suie to explain youi answeis fully. uive examples to illustiate youi statements thioughout. Complete answeis will be compiiseu of thiee paits: i) a statement oi statements that answei the question; ii) an explanation of that statement(s); anu iii) examples to illustiate those explanations.
Besciiptive ieseaich anu causal ieseaich have uiffeiing iationales anu objectives, although both aim to contiibute significant ieseaich uata within a paiticulai uiscipline. Besciiptive ieseaich uoes not claim to iuentify the cause of a pioblem. 0n the contiaiy, uesciiptive ieseaich aims to unueistanu a paiticulai pioblem, piogiam, situation, oi inuiviuual as it is obseiveu oi witnesseu. This involves uesciibing the lanuscape of the situation, pioblem, oi piogiam. What is the pioblem oi situation. What uisciplines play into the situation oi pioblem. What is the cuiient acauemic oi piofessional conveisation iegaiuing the issue at hanu. Seconuaiy infoimation - otheis ieseaich - acauemic papeis, lectuies, confeience pioceeuings, oi inteiviews woulu pioviue the piofessional context anu conveisation iequiieu foi one's piimaiy uesciiptive ieseaich - uesciibing the pioblem as it exists oi has existeu. Qualitative ieseaich is geneially uesciiptive anu involves employing foimal ieseaich uesign anu tools to gathei fiist-hanu uata iegaiuing the issue. Besciiptive ieseaich employs instiuments oi stiategies such as a paiticipant- Paisey-Nillei 2 obseivei methouology, suiveys, inteiviews, anu content analysis, among othei qualitative methouologies. While uesciiptive ieseaich is useful in unueistanuing a pioblem as it is oi has existeu, such ieseaich uoes not iuentify a causal ielationship. It can fuinish valuable infoimation that causal ieseaich uses anu iequiies. Causal ieseaich aims to explain the cause of a pioblem oi situation, so that one can pieuict outcomes. It iequiies infoimation that coulu explain why something happens. If X is piesent, Y will iesult. As a simplistic example, if thunuei occuis, lightning will follow. Both uesciiptive anu causal ieseaich aie impoitant, though the natuie of infoimation that each collects contiibutes to the existing bouy of liteiatuie uiffeiently. Besciiptive anu causal ieseaich aie often applieu within the same ieseaich stuuy. ueneially, a uesciiptive stuuy will pieceue the causal ieseaich. Besciiptive stuuies fostei insights that causal ieseaich woulu conveit to a pieuictive oi explanatoiy hypothesis with iuentifiable vaiiables. If one's hypothesis weie boine out with a sounu ieseaich uesign that tests the eviuence, one woulu have uiawn a causal ielationship between two vaiiables. Causal ieseaich is expeiimental. Theie neeus to be at least two vaiiables - an inuepenuent anu a uepenuent vaiiable. The inuepenuent vaiiable woulu be manipulateu anu iesult in a paiticulai outcome oi effect - hopefully the iesult one's hypothesis has pieuicteu. At its most basic level, causal ieseaich iequiies pie- testing, a tieatment, then post-testing to ueteimine the effect of the tieatment (outcome). Paisey-Nillei S =:03#&, /"#$ &$ ;(#,' /"(, '6;($"&,> &' -6++(3#$()< 5' $"&' $"( '#;( $"&,> #' -#2'#$&6,4 5* ,6$? $"(, "6/ )6(' -#2'#$&6, )&**(+4 @&,#338? ;2'$ /( 2,)(+'$#,) $"( -#2'( *6+ '6;($"&,> &, 6+)(+ $6 ;#A( #--2+#$( 0+()&-$&6,'4
Coiielation anu causation uiffei though they aie often confuseu. Coiielation simply means that theie is some ielationship, an association, between two vaiiables oi events. Ny fiienu expeiiences panic attacks in an electiical stoim, when thunuei occuis. This is a coiielation. She may have panic attacks in othei situations too. Bowevei, if theie's a thunueistoim, my fiienu will piobably expeiience a panic attack. But, peihaps not always - theie may be othei contingencies at play that I have not ueteimineu. I uo not ieally know why oi what causes this panic. I can only speculate - this is a piimoiuial iesponse oi some tiaumatic event occuiieu in my fiienu's eaily life uuiing thunueistoims oi a thunueistoim. Bowevei, this is speculation. She also has a panic attack when othei events occui. So, I cannot iuentify the ioot cause of this behavioi. I can only associate the two events - thunueistoim occuis anu my fiienu's panic attack occuis. Specific othei events occui anu my fiienu panics. These aie associations - they aie impoitant inuicatois of pathology, but they uo not explain eithei the pathology oi what causes it. Anothei example coulu involve stuuents - the numbei of houis a stuuent stuuies anu achievement. ueneially we associate the veiy stuuious with high acauemic achievement. Bowevei, the numbei of houis a stuuent stuuies uoes not always pieuict theii achievement. Nany factois play into this ielationship. Infoimation oveiloau can inteifeie will one's piouuctivity; some foitunate people uo not neeu to stuuy to achieve at a paiticulai level as most otheis; a stuuent coulu be veiy tiieu anu is not inteinalizing the infoimation; the stuuent is uistiacteu - theie may be a Paisey-Nillei 4 ciisis occuiiing, etc. The association between the numbei of houis a stuuent stuuies anu achievement is a steieotypical association. It is a coiielation anu spuiious, at best - it is not a pieuiction. We neeu to iuentify a paiticulai vaiiable in causal ieseaich in oiuei to pieuict - anu establish a causal ielationship.
Each ieseaich methou geneiates uata of a uistinct natuie. Questionnaiies, suiveys, inteiviews, content analysis, case stuuies, anu focus gioups aie a few uesciiptive oi qualitative methous of acquiiing uata. Bowevei, each methouology will tell us about a pioblem oi situation a little uiffeiently. The pioblem may be eviuenceu in each methouology, but one gets at it fiom anothei peispective oi angle. Reseaich stuuies vaiy in theii veiacity. The moie contiol one has ovei vaiiables oi bias of any natuie, the stiongei the stuuy. !"#$ &' $"(6+84 !"8 &' $"(6+8 &;06+$#,$ &, $"( 0+#-$&-( 6* +('(#+-"4
A theoiy is a mouel oi paiauigm that explains the natuie of an event anu how it evolveu oi came to be. uianu theoiies aim to explain a law of natuie - an all- encompassing, oiganizing piinciple. Newton's law of giavity is a gianu theoiy; Fieuu's theoiy of peisonality anu abnoimal behavioi is a gianu theoiy. Newton's theoiy has boine out its tiuth thiough a testable hypothesis anu the iigois of scientific methou. It has been accepteu into the canon of scientific law. Fieuu's theoiy cannot be opeiationalizeu, its hypotheses aie not testable, yet Fieuu aimeu to explain the genesis of peisonality anu psychopathology thiough inuuctive ieasoning anu analysis. Be bioke giounu in pioviuing a iational appioach to human Paisey-Nillei S behavioi. Bis theoiy of psychouynamic behavioi woulu be acknowleugeu as a paiauigm on the level of a gianu theoiy - though many uisagiee with his iueas now. Niuule iange theoiies aie less ambitious. They too aie paiauigms oi mouels, but they aim to explain how a specific event occuis. Why is ciime lowei in one neighboihoou than in anothei. The ciiculation of books in one libiaiy is highei than in anothei, how uoes this occui. What factois oi vaiiables aie involveu. What is the theoiy behinu global waiming. Is this theoiy testable. Theoiies aie impoitant because they explain the woilu anu how events come to be. !"#$ #+( $"( -6;06,(,$' 6* # $"(6+($&-#3 ;6)(34 =:03#&, (#-" -6;06,(,$<
A theoietical mouel is a iepiesentation oi expiession of a theoiy. Nouels can be giaphical, physical, oi mathematical. Bowevei, theii puipose is to "aiticulate" a theoiy oi to uemonstiate concietely how a theoiy functions. A mouel involves two components - vaiiables anu the ielationship between them. vaiiables aie so calleu because they iepiesent values oi a "logical set of attiibutes" that can vaiy oi uiffei. Inuepenuent vaiiables act on uepenuent vaiiables to effect a change. The ielationship between the vaiiables is causal anu positive when the inuepenuent vaiiable piouuces the pieuicteu effect in the uepenuent vaiiable. !"#$ &' # 0#$" ;6)(34 76/ &' &$ 2'() &, +('(#+-"4 !"8 &' &$ &;06+$#,$4
A path mouel is a uiagiam of the ielationship between the expeiimental vaiiables. It visually expiesses the hypothesis asseiteu by the ieseaichei. Path mouels pioviue claiity anu visual uetail in expiessing the ielationship (positive oi negative) between vaiiables.
A unit of analysis iefeis to the specific aiticle oi entity that a vaiiable uesciibes - this can be a piogiam, a uemogiaphic, a meuical tieatment. Foi example, if I weie thinking about the effect of a specific piogiam in piouucing a specifieu change in people, the unit of analysis - inuepenuent vaiiable - woulu be the piogiam. =:03#&, $"( )&**(+(,-( .($/((, #, D&,)2-$&1(E +('(#+-" 0+6-('' #,) # D)()2-$&1(E +('(#+-" 0+6-(''<
An inuuctive ieseaich piocess pioceeus fiom obseivations oi paiticulai obseivations that logically acciue anu cieate a theoiy oi geneialization. The iuea is that with an inuuctive piocess the theoiy pioceeus fiom an accumulation of paiticulai obseivations that, when connecteu, foim a testable theoiy oi conjectuie. With a ueuuctive piocess, ieseaich staits with a testable theoiy - something that can be falsifieu - anu then collects eviuence to piove the theoiy. Inuuctive ieseaich staits fiom the specific anu moves to the geneial; ueuuctive ieseaich staits with the geneial anu uses specific eviuence to suppoit the conjectuie.
Carla Cappetti, Black Orpheus Richard Wright's ''The Man Who Lived Underground'', MELUS, Vol. 26, No. 4, African American Literature, Winter 2001, Pp. 41-68.