0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
413 просмотров3 страницы
This Newton teacher's lesson plan dismisses the religious and ideological component of the conflict as unimportant, stating that "This is a conflict over land." What lies behind the downplaying of the religious component is an apparent attempt to cast Israel as a neo-colonial state usurping the land of the indigenous population. This narrative, fashionable among anti-Israel academics, designates the Arabs as indigenous people, while denying that status to the Jews whose continuous history on the land goes much further back.
The class discussion guide asserts "Jewish nationalism (Zionism) and Palestinian nationalism seek essentially the same goal: a state that can provide security, economic opportunity, and a connection to a land ..." This attempt at even-handedness promulgates a falsehood; for in both the PLO and Hamas covenants the fulfillment of nationalist goals requires the dismantling of the Jewish state. In fact, an accurate account of the genesis of Palestinian nationalism shows that opposition to the Jewish state came first, while the demand for a Palestinian Arab state emerged only later as part of the "Phased Plan" for destroying Israel.
Оригинальное название
Newton Teacher's Class Notes for Israel-Palistine [sic]
This Newton teacher's lesson plan dismisses the religious and ideological component of the conflict as unimportant, stating that "This is a conflict over land." What lies behind the downplaying of the religious component is an apparent attempt to cast Israel as a neo-colonial state usurping the land of the indigenous population. This narrative, fashionable among anti-Israel academics, designates the Arabs as indigenous people, while denying that status to the Jews whose continuous history on the land goes much further back.
The class discussion guide asserts "Jewish nationalism (Zionism) and Palestinian nationalism seek essentially the same goal: a state that can provide security, economic opportunity, and a connection to a land ..." This attempt at even-handedness promulgates a falsehood; for in both the PLO and Hamas covenants the fulfillment of nationalist goals requires the dismantling of the Jewish state. In fact, an accurate account of the genesis of Palestinian nationalism shows that opposition to the Jewish state came first, while the demand for a Palestinian Arab state emerged only later as part of the "Phased Plan" for destroying Israel.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
This Newton teacher's lesson plan dismisses the religious and ideological component of the conflict as unimportant, stating that "This is a conflict over land." What lies behind the downplaying of the religious component is an apparent attempt to cast Israel as a neo-colonial state usurping the land of the indigenous population. This narrative, fashionable among anti-Israel academics, designates the Arabs as indigenous people, while denying that status to the Jews whose continuous history on the land goes much further back.
The class discussion guide asserts "Jewish nationalism (Zionism) and Palestinian nationalism seek essentially the same goal: a state that can provide security, economic opportunity, and a connection to a land ..." This attempt at even-handedness promulgates a falsehood; for in both the PLO and Hamas covenants the fulfillment of nationalist goals requires the dismantling of the Jewish state. In fact, an accurate account of the genesis of Palestinian nationalism shows that opposition to the Jewish state came first, while the demand for a Palestinian Arab state emerged only later as part of the "Phased Plan" for destroying Israel.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd