Welcome to John Bedini's Web pages

have moved to www.icehouse.net/john34

This is also the basics for Tesla's energy shuttle circuits The two most important electrical energy statements ever made!!

Gabriel ron !"#! to !"$% ron& Gabriel. "...the missing concept of "open-paths" (the dual of "closed-paths") was discovered, in which currents could be made to flow in branches that lie between any set of two nodes. (Previously following Ma well engineers tied all of their open-paths to a single

datum-point, the !ground!)."hat discovery of open-paths established a second rectangular transformation matri ... which created !lamellar! currents..." "# networ$ with the simultaneous presence of both closed and open paths was the answer to the author!s years-long search." Gabriel ron& 'The (rustrating )earch for a
Geometrical *odel of +lectrodynamic ,etwor-s&' .ournal un-.& issue un-.& circa !"$/& p. !!!0!/%. The 1uote is from p. !!4.

ron& Gabriel. . "%hen only positive and negative real numbers e ist, it is customary to replace a positive resistance by an inductance and a negative resistance by a capacitor (since none or only a few negative resistances e ist on practical networ$ analy&ers.)" Gabriel ron& ',umerical solution of ordinary and partial differential e1uations by means of e1uivalent circuits.' .ournal of 2pplied 3hysics& 4ol. !$& *ar. !"45a& p. !63.

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUN !I"NS

7et it be assumed as an e8ample that the 4 function is a potential well 9(ig. 4a:. Then in the networ- the corresponding positive resistances assume either a constant or a ;ero value as shown in (ig. 4b. <n practice it is sufficient to e8tend the networ- to& say& twice the width of the potential well on either side. 7et now a d.c.9or a.c.: generator be inserted anywhere in the networ- parallel with one of the negative resistances 9inductors:& as shown. <f the values of all the negative resistances 0+=8 9capacitors: are simultaneously varied by the same amount& it will be found that the current 9reactive current: in the generator varies and at some value of +=8 becomes ;ero. <t should be noted that while a current 9reactive current: flows in the generator the circuit does not satisfy the differential e1uation& since at one point in the networ- 9where the generator is connected: the currents do not add up to ;ero 9as re1uired by the e1uation: but to the generator current. That is& while a current flows in the generator& the voltages = do not represent solutions of the differential e1uation. >ence& only those networ- conditions are of interest in which

the generator current is ;ero.

inductors and capacitors& the circuit is a resonant circuit and it oscillates at its basic fre1uency.: + is then an eigenvalue +n& while the voltage distribution across the capacitors 9(ig. 4c: gives the

,ow a value + of the negative resistances& at which the generator current becomes ;ero& represents a state at which the circuit is self0supporting and has a continuous e8istence of its own without the presence of the generator&as the negative resistances just supply the energy consumed by the positive resistances. 9<f the circuit contains

corresponding eigenfunction =n.

generator current the circuit neither gives nor ta-es energy& and theoretically the generator may be removed. 2ll values of + at which the current crosses the a8es and becomes ;ero are eigenvalues of the e1uation and the corresponding voltage distribution curves are eigenfunctions. ?hen the energy level + overflows the well& the discrete spectrum of eigenvalues changes into a continuous spectrum and the generator current is ;ero at all greater values of +. ?hen the energy + changes sign& the negative resistances become positive resistances and at no value of 0+ may the circuit be self0supporting 9as it contains only positive resistances:. That is& the e1uation has no negative eigenvalues.

?hen the generator current is positive the circuit draws energy from the source& and when the current is negative the circuit pumps bac- energy into the source. 2t ;ero

!#E S!A!IS!I AL $EAN "F "%E&A!"&S

To bring the measurements at the different energy levels to the same base& it is necessary to normali;e the measured = values so that the new values of = satisfy the e1uation

The measured = functions are normali;ed by plotting the s1uare of =. <f the area under the curve is !/,/& all values of = are multiplied by ,. Then ,= is the normali;ed =. 92ctually , may contain an arbitrary phase ei= .: The statistical mean of an operator a for a state = is defined as

)ince 9a=8:= is a current 9reactive current: flowing through an admittance& =@9a=8:= is the power 9reactive power: in a single admittance. >ence the total power in a complete set of similar admittances& namely&

represents the statistical mean of the corresponding energy operator. That isA

'( The total power in all the vertical negative resistors is the average value of +. 9That is& + itself& since = is an eigenfunction of >:. )( The total power in all the vertical resistors is the average value of the potential energy 4. *( The total power in all the hori&ontal resistors is the same as the total power in the vertical units& representing the average of the -inetic energy T B p// /m. That is& the total power in all positive resistors is the same as the total power in all the negative resistors& or

!#E !#I&D $"DEL

7et the wave e1uation be divided by i=c& where =c B v= B 9+/ h:C& and multiplied by =8A

<n the present caseA '( The -inetic energy operator T is represented 9(ig. 5: by a set of e1ual inductors in series& whose inductance 7! is 9/m/ h/:=8.

)( The potential energy operator 4 is represented by a set of une1ual coils in parallel& whose inductance 7/ is !/ 4=8. *( The total energy operator 0 + is represented by a set of e1ual capacitors in parallel whose capacitance is now h=8. 9<n the second model the capacitance was the un-nown +=8.: The operand = is again represented by voltages and the result of the operation a= by the same currents as in the first model. Their variation in time now is sinusoidal& with / p fc B =c.

<nstead of varying the magnitude of the capacitors& now the fre1uency of the generator is varied& thereby varying the admittance of the capacitors& h=c B + 9and those of the inductors:. 2gain when the generator current becomes ;ero the circuit is oscillatory and self0supporting and the networ- represents a stationary solution of the e1uation.
The corresponding eigenvalue is + B h= B h9=c :/& rather than h=c& because of the simultaneous variation of the reactance of the inductive coils. The eigenfunctions = of the model and of the e1uation are& however& identical.

2s the currents in the hori;ontal inductors are 9h///mi=c :==/ =8& the results of an operation on = by the momentum operator p B 9h / i:=/ =8 are these currents divided by h// /m=c. >ence& in the third model the momentum operator p may be represented by a set of e1ual hori;ontal coils with inductance 7 B =8/h=c. Dne slight disadvantage of this third model is that as the energy + changes sign& the reactance of the capacitor j=ch cannot change signs. )ince in most cases no eigenvalues e8ist in the negative energy range& this disadvantage is of little conse1uence. Df course& the second model with fi8ed fre1uency and variable capacitors wor-s in all cases& since the capacitors simply become inductors when + changes sign.

!#E F&EE %A&!I LE IN "NE DI$ENSI"N

2n interesting special case occurs when the potential 4 is ;ero everywhere. The one0dimensional e1uivalent circuit of such a free particle is a conventional transmission line e8tending to infinity in both directions 9(ig. $: in which the series inductance is /m =8/ h/ and the shunt capacitor is

h=8.

<t is well -nown that such a transmission line may maintain a standing wave at any fre1uency = B=c between ;ero and infinity drawing no current from the generator. That is& the positive energy values form a continuous spectrum. <f the transmission line is considered as the second type of model with variable capacitors& then at negative energy values + the capacitors also become inductors and the line cannot maintain a standing wave. The corresponding free particle also has no eigenvalue at the negative energy levels.

$"DELS AL"NG U&VILINEA& A+ES

The three0dimensional )chrEdinger e1uation for a single particle is

where =/ is the 7aplacian operator in curvilinear coordinates. <n order to establish a physical model for it& it is necessary to change it to a tensor density e1uation. ,)The above e1uation in orthogonal curvilinear coordinates may be changed to a tensor density form by multiplying it by h!h/h3 B vg giving

<f the e1uation is multiplied through by =u!=u/=u3& it represents the surface integral of grad = around the si8 faces of a cube of space with volume h!h/h3=u!=u/=u3. The width =ua may be arbitrary and different in the three directions.

The corresponding e1uivalent circuit is shown in (ig. 6. (or a free particle 94B#: it represents a generali;ation of the conventional one0dimen0 sional transmission line to three dimensions.

<t must be remembered that for a period during the !"$#s ron had refused to publish. Then he began to publish again& but very cautiously. Thus he was reluctant to ta-e my advice about the new introduction. Furing two successive )aturdays of intensive discussion about this matter he told me that he was leaving his scientific colleagues behind and entering a new world& that hisnew discoveries would not be understood unless fully elaborated& and if elaborated would be plagiari;ed. <n any event& he had no intention of tipping his hand until he had fully tested his new theories. 2s < read the new introduction& < find that he tempori;ed. >e did put his wor- in the perspective of its growth and development and did indicate the direction in which he was moving& but all in great generalities. These generalities may be informative& but if they are not then one would have to fall bac- on a comparison of the preliminary drafts of the new introduction 0 if such drafts are still e8tant. ?e -now that with the successful development of 'Fia-optics' Gabe turned his attention to new and greater challenges& to the comprehension of phenomena of a highly comple8 nature 0 multidimensional phenomena. (rom a philosophical point of view each such phenomenon would be considered comple8 because each was conceived as constituting a system not only of manifold operations& but of manifold heterogeneous operations. The prototype of this increasingly bold speculation and research was GabeGs 'crystal computer or vest poc-et computer&' as it was sometimes jo-ingly referred to& which utili;ed the simultaneous and

heterogeneous activity of a crystal under stimulation of a single electric source.The

important steps here seem to have been the perception of an analogy between the optical properties of a crystal under stimulation of a single source of light and the mathematical properties of an electromagnetic field surrounding an electric current& together with the successful use of topology to understand and manipulate them. < say that the 'crystal computer' constituted a prototype because < believe this worwas successfully accomplished in all its theoretical aspects long before his death&for Gabriel ron showed me what he considered to be proof of the superiority of his new instrument. Hy this time& however& something else had entered his mind. < suspect that with the theoretical bac-ground of his wor- in developing the 'crystal computer' it was not a big jump for the mind of a Gabriel ron to begin thin-ing of the universe itself as a crystal.< also suspect that what he was wor-ing on when he died was a general theory applicable to the universe as a whole system.2fter all the universe is a comple8 phenomenon in which many heterogeneous activities ta-e place simultaneously. 3erhaps Gabe had more than a vague intuition about short0cuts for
interplanetary travel.

Hut what was Gabriel ron up too that he was very cautious about=

!he './'. lass A Ampli0ie1

The Iarest of the Hedini 2mplifiers.

The model !#/!# class 2 amplifier only 35 in number. This 2mplifier was given to dealers who sold Hedini products as a leader piece of e1uipment. <f the dealer bought a mi8 of products then one *odel !#/!# amplifier was given to them. ,othing could come close to the sonic ability of this amp e8cept for the 4intage T %% tube amplifier 9 pictured on the first page:. < designed this 2mplifier and have seen these amps selling on eH2J for as high as K%##.## or more& the original cost to the public was K365.##. The 2mplifier was used by most people for )T2L >eadphones and in Tri02mp systems where three Hedini amplifiers would be used& because all the input voltage levels were the same. )imple passive crossovers were the only thing needed.

!he )2/)2 lass A Ampli0ie1

This 2mplifier is going to be reproduced by Hedini in a 4intage )eries *ono Hloc-s in Fecember !0 /### ' )pecial Drder only' Hedini +lectronics <nc !0/#%066604/""

?hat did they say about the /5//5 The 2udio Mritic
4olume /& ,umber 3 (all !"%# )pring through
)ince our original review in the last issue& the marvelous little model /5//5 had undergone a K!"5 price increase and some major changes in its internal physical layout& eliminating virtually all wiring other then the circuit boards themselves. The sound is& if anything& even betterN the sil-iness of the highs and the transparency of the midrange are unsurpassed in our e8perience& e8cept possibly by some00 not all00 versions of the (utterman tube amplifier and one or two e8perimental solid state prototypes. The bottom end of the Hedini is very impressive for a /5//50 watt stereo amplifier with a single power supply& but of course there are many large amplifiers with all0out dual power supplies that will give you firmer and subjectively deeper bass& 9.ohn Hedini has been e8perimenting with a heavily beefed0up power supplies for a variant version of the /5//5N we have loo-ed at a slightly miscalculated sample and found it 1uit promising& but for the moment this is not a commercially available product and would have to sell at a much higher price if it were mar-eted.: ?e want to state again that the Hedini /5//5 appears to be just about the ideal amplifier for driving the Ouad electrostatic loudspea-erN the combination provides the utmost clarity& very satisfactory )37 capability and complete safety& since the largest voltage swing the /5//5 can deliver into a load of any impedance is considerably short of whatever could damage the Ouad&

even on a long0term basis. 2nd that K%45 price tag seems a little more tolerable in a low0powered amplifier when you can tell yourself that you're buying a Ouad accessory. ?e also wish to withdraw our recommendation of the Motter ,(H0/ noise filter/buffer for use at the input of the /5//5. that was our initial lab bench determinationN several months of listening e8perience have convinced us that real0world input signals& even the fasts& are unable to get the Hedini into any -ind of audible trouble.

The Dne *eg Mlass 2 /5//5

The amplifier that blew the others away!!! This amplifier is the most sought after by audiophiles to this day& their is nothing in the mar-et to compare it to in the /5 watt range. The amplifier used one of the best transistors that *otorola ever made the /,5%%5& 4*h; device at /5 amps. This amplifier is also a positive feedbac- feed forward circuit using a dual diff0amp front end li-e all Hedini amplifiers coupled to the ,3, 1uasi0 complimentary output stage.The amplifier also used modified diff amplifiers using tunnel diodesto balance the currents. This amplifier would run loads down to !ohm with no problem& most of these amplifiers were used to run ribbon loudspea-ers to high levels.

!he inte1nal 3ie4 sho4s that it 5sed d5al t1ans0o1me1s in p5sh p5ll 4i1ed to a po4e1 s5ppl6 boa1d 4ith )*7... U0 capacito1s( !he1e 4e1e '' de3ices pe1 channel7 it also 5sed a split po4e1 s5ppl6 at 8. 3olts(

The *odel %#! Mlass 2 2mplifier

The model %#! amplifier was manufactured between .une !"%6 to 2ugust of /###. The amplifier was !/# watts at % Dhms with less then .! T>F /# to /# h;& The %#! amplifier used the /5//5 drive boards with a bigger power supply. This amplifier will also be produced in the 4intage series *ono Hloc-s. The more we study the construction of these amplifiers the better the chances to build any power level into the 4intage series *ono Hloc-s& -eeping the best sound 1uality of all the amplifiers.

The *odel !##P!## Fual *ono Dne *eg

The model !##P!## dual mono one meg

This amplifier is in the same class as the model /5P/5 Dne *eg using the same chassis as the model /##P/##& the amplifier is gray in color only. Their is a matching pre0amp dual mono also gray in color.

!he './'. lass A Ampli0ie1

The Iarest of the Hedini 2mplifiers.

The model !#/!# class 2 amplifier only 35 in number. This 2mplifier was given to dealers who sold Hedini products as a leader piece of e1uipment. <f the dealer bought a mi8 of products then one *odel !#/!# amplifier was given to them. ,othing could come close to the sonic ability of this amp e8cept for the 4intage T %% tube amplifier 9 pictured on the first page:. < designed this 2mplifier and have seen these amps selling on eH2J for as high as K%##.## or more& the original cost to the public was K365.##. The 2mplifier was used by most people for )T2L >eadphones and in Tri02mp systems where three Hedini amplifiers would be used& because all the input voltage levels were the same. )imple passive crossovers were the only thing needed.

!he )2/)2 lass A Ampli0ie1

This 2mplifier is going to be reproduced by Hedini in a 4intage )eries *ono Hloc-s in Fecember !0 /### ' )pecial Drder only' Hedini +lectronics <nc !0/#%066604/""

?hat did they say about the /5//5 The 2udio Mritic
4olume /& ,umber 3 (all !"%# )pring through
)ince our original review in the last issue& the marvelous little model /5//5 had undergone a K!"5 price increase and some major changes in its internal physical layout& eliminating virtually all wiring other then the circuit boards themselves. The sound is& if anything& even betterN the sil-iness of the highs and the transparency of the midrange are unsurpassed in our e8perience& e8cept possibly by some00 not all00 versions of the (utterman tube amplifier and one or two e8perimental solid state prototypes. The bottom end of the Hedini is very impressive for a /5//50 watt stereo amplifier with a single power supply& but of course there are many large amplifiers with all0out dual power supplies that will give you firmer and subjectively deeper bass& 9.ohn Hedini has been e8perimenting with a heavily beefed0up power supplies for a variant version of the /5//5N we have loo-ed at a slightly miscalculated sample and found it 1uit promising& but for the moment this is not a commercially available product and would have to sell at a much higher price if it were mar-eted.: ?e want to state again that the Hedini /5//5 appears to be just about the ideal amplifier for driving the Ouad electrostatic loudspea-erN the combination provides the utmost clarity& very satisfactory )37 capability and complete safety& since the largest voltage swing the /5//5 can deliver into a load of any impedance is considerably short of whatever could damage the Ouad& even on a long0term basis. 2nd that K%45 price tag seems a little more tolerable in a low0powered amplifier when you can tell yourself that you're buying a Ouad accessory. ?e also wish to withdraw our recommendation of the Motter ,(H0/ noise filter/buffer for use at the input of the /5//5. that was our initial lab bench determinationN several months of listening e8perience have convinced us that real0world input signals& even the fasts& are unable to get the Hedini into any -ind of audible trouble.

The Dne *eg Mlass 2 /5//5

The amplifier that blew the others away!!! This amplifier is the most sought after by audiophiles to this day& their is nothing in the mar-et to compare it to in the /5 watt range. The amplifier used one of the best transistors that *otorola ever made the /,5%%5& 4*h; device at /5 amps. This amplifier is also a positive feedbac- feed forward circuit using a dual diff0amp front end li-e all Hedini amplifiers coupled to the ,3, 1uasi0 complimentary output stage.The amplifier also used modified diff amplifiers using tunnel diodesto balance the currents. This amplifier would run loads down to !ohm with no problem& most of these amplifiers were used to run ribbon loudspea-ers to high levels.

!he inte1nal 3ie4 sho4s that it 5sed d5al t1ans0o1me1s in p5sh p5ll 4i1ed to a po4e1 s5ppl6 boa1d 4ith )*7... U0 capacito1s( !he1e 4e1e '' de3ices pe1 channel7 it also 5sed a split po4e1 s5ppl6 at 8. 3olts(

The *odel %#! Mlass 2 2mplifier

The model %#! amplifier was manufactured between .une !"%6 to 2ugust of /###. The amplifier was !/# watts at % Dhms with less then .! T>F /# to /# h;& The %#! amplifier used the /5//5 drive boards with a bigger power supply. This amplifier will also be produced in the 4intage series *ono Hloc-s. The more we study the construction of these amplifiers the better the chances to build any power level into the 4intage series *ono Hloc-s& -eeping the best sound 1uality of all the amplifiers.

The *odel !##P!## Fual *ono Dne *eg

The model !##P!## dual mono one meg

This amplifier is in the same class as the model /5P/5 Dne *eg using the same chassis as the model /##P/##& the amplifier is gray in color only. Their is a matching pre0amp dual mono also gray in color.

This may be the last hope when the power systems go down and there is no more fuel..... ?e will ta-e the power from the ground and learn how to use the earth for the good of all. This wor- is based on the boo- '7ost )cience' by Gerry 4assilatos. < have just pointed out the important parts in red& but < have hundreds of hours in the circuit designs. 3eter 7indemann pointed out this wor- to me two years ago. )ince then < have wor-ed with the )tubblefield technology and many others. Go to 3eter's pages here httpA//www.free0energy.cc/ '2fter the third tribulation& a new source of energy will be discovered that taps the +arth *agnetic field.' 0>opi 3rophecy

St5bble0ield
!his is m6 1esea1ch on Nathan St5bble0ield( 9#ello7 &ain6(9 0 <n !%"/& ignorant of the wireless inventions of the past $# years& ,athan creates an electromagnetic induction wireless telephone and demonstrates it to his friend Iainey ?ells. 2 few years later& ,athan develops a superior wireless telephone that uses natural conduction through the earth and water.
Hob 7ochte has done an enormous amount of wor- uncovering papers& notes and pictures& and 1uotes on ,athan )tubblefield. There is one pu;;ling thing to me about the )tubblefield device. <t seems to me that Tesla is standing in one of the pictures. < have chec-ed the references and& yes& Tesla is in the picture. ,ow that < understand this& it brings me to the conclusion that the waves )tubblefield used were longitudinal in nature.

Meucci hearing through wires

+ven without )tubblefield& *arconi still wouldn't be the true inventor of radio 0 ,i-ola Tesla invented it before *arconi. *arconi& in fact& used Tesla's own patents as research materials. !esla7 in t51n7 4as among the c51io5s onloo:e1s in attendance at St5bble0ield's ';.) 4i1eless demonst1ation in %hiladelphia(

)tubblefield also developed a battery to power this system and a motor& that we will get into later. ,ow around !%6% 2mos Folbear files a patent on what he called induction wireless telephone& demonstrated publicly in the us& Manada& and +urope in !%%/ and !%%3& patented in Q.).!%%$. ?hat is ama;ing to me is that the patent uses an elevated capacitance. )o this is not the same as a >erti;an wave transmitter. <t is very clear that the capacitance acts as the antenna and the return is using the earth as ground. The induction coil is used as a high self0inductance only& creating a very high potential or stress in the aether.

',ow&' Tesla writes later on about the transmitter that he was developing& '< attac-ed vigorously the development of my magnifying transmitter& now however& not so much with the original intention of producing one of great power& as with the object of learning how to construct the best one. This is essentially& a circuit of high self0 induction and small resistance 9 -ey words coming up: which in its arrangement& mode of e8citation and section and action& may be said to be the diametrical opposite of a transmitting circuit typical of telegraphy by >ert;ian or electromagnetic radiations.'

?hat )tubblefield had discovered and what he do with his system.

)tubblefield was e8perimenting with ground radio since !%%/& but did not patent his developments until much later. Mredible witnesses saw his ground radio e8periments in action during this time frame& establishing the historical priority of )tubblefield.?hile *arconi could barely send telegraphic 'dots and dash' signals with great difficultythrough a static0filled medium& ,athan )tubblefield had already transmitted the human voice with loud& velvet clarity. Dthers would adopt and implement the Mollins system 9(essenden& Fe(orest& Hethenod& Hraun:& but none could duplicate the )tubblefield )ystem. ,i-ola Tesla performed double ground e8periments with impulses as early as !%"/& reporting these in lectures and patenting some embodiments in !"#!. ,ot one of theselater systems ever achieved the same results of clarity& tone& and volume of )tubblefield ground telephony. Tesla apparently never discovered the true powerpoints which powered )tubblefield's device. 3riority in all these arts belongs to ,athan )tubblefield alone. <n addition& his was the only system in which natural energies were obtained& magnified& and entirely employed as the empowering source. 2ll other inventors used 'artificial' sources 9batteries& alternators& dynamos:.

(ollowing all these ground radio demonstrations& )tubblefield researched '*agnetic ?aves' and developed several systems which did not use ground terminals for e8changing signals. 7ong distance wireless telephone communications were his aim. *any imagined this to be radio as we -now it& but several features of )tubblefield aerial are distinctive and different. (irst his transmitters and receivers were telephonic& not telegraphic. <n his preliminary e8periments& the earth battery was used to energi;e an apparatus to which was connected a long hori;ontal aerial line. *arconi later adopted this 'bent 7' symmetry in conjunction with a grounded copper conduction screen. There are no photographs of these arrays& but < have hand0written manuscript copies of certain diary notes in which a progressively greater telephonic distance is reported. ,athan )tubblefield made steady progress in this form of telephonic transmission & but used neither alternators nor spar- discharge. *r. )tubblefield reasoned that& since electrical waves traverse the whole earth& it might be possible to send signals to distant places. These ground0permeating natural electrical waves might serve as carriers for the human voice. The ground would act as both power generator and signal conductor. 7i-e a gale carrying messages downwind& these electrical waves could bring wireless communications instantly to any part of the world. These transmissions were made through the ground itself and used the )tubblefield cell for power. <n several photographs we see special loud spea-ing telephones outfitted with 9! foot: horns& designed to act as annunciators. Malls from these annunciators brought his son Hernard to the telephone transmitter. The system was

never switched off. 3ower was limitless and did not diminish with time of the day or length of use.

,atural observations in systems led to une8pected& theory0busting discoveries. )uch an effect demonstrates that an articulate 1uasi0intelligent energy permeates the natural environment.... an energy of which electricity is a minor part. Two more mysteries have lingered from this latter period of invention in the )tubblefield biography. The nature of each reveals the e8tent to which he had developed and advanced his new earth power technology. ,athan continued to pursue his e8periments& but little was seen of him for long time periods. 2lone and tired& ,athan stopped wor-ing his farm completely. 7ater& <nvestigators entered his land area and found heavy wires leading from the roots of trees. To these wires were attached small arc lamps& hung in the trees. These were e8tinguished. They imagined the arc lamps to be the e8planation of his hillside sunlight. Their hasty analysis proved problematic from stories which witnesses report. The warm and diffused sunlight which came from the ground itself around his house was not locali;ed in specific lamps. The light came from the ground& not from the trees as before... a 'whole hillside that would blossom with light'... 'lit up li-e daytime'. These observations indicate that )tubblefield had managed indeed the direct conversion of earth energy to light and warmth. This would acceptable& were *r. )tubblefield simply wor-ing on a newer form of drawing electricity from the ground to light small arc0lampsN a feat which he had accomplished earlier. Hut these -ind persons could never find any evidence of arc0lighting or any other form of -nown lighting anywhere near the area. <n their own words 'the light seemed to come out from the ground itself'. <n addition to ground sunlight effects& many heard very loud and unfamiliar noises coming from the whole area surrounding his cabin. ?hat could this be= >ad he managed to directly transduce the natural impulses of the ground energy into audio= >is last claim two wee-s before his death was made to a -ind neighborA 'The past is nothing. < have perfected now the greatest invention the world has ever -nown..... < have ta-en light from the air and earth.... as < did sound.' ,eighbors had not seen ,athan for several days. 2s they were worried about his health& they attempted to call on him. The loc- was secured from the inside. <t was a lonely& cold and rainy *arch day when old friends and neighbors bro-e the loc- on

,athan's cabin and entered. >e had passed away in his bed& the probable victim of malnutrition and fatigue. They all noticed that the interior of the cabin was 'toasty warm'& as if heated by a strong fire. *oved to locate the source of this heat& town officials found ' two highly polished metal mirrors which faced each other& radiating a very great heat in rippling waves' This is a great discovery. <t fulfills what ,athan reported in his last testimony. This picture was sent in by Gandolf Gwynn. >e wanted to -now who was hiding behind the tree= The man behind the tree is Fr. ?ill *ason.

The rods in the picture are about /# feet apart in a straight line. ,athan )tubblefield receiving a message.

,athan )tubblefield used earth magnetic currents. this is not current as we -now it. +lectricity is a wasted product of this magnetic current.

The +lectrical Dcean.

<f you are building an earth battery it is best to do it as the patent calls out. This means that you should not use anything that causes a forced voltage. <t was not until later that people used sulfur ca-es and other acids to get the voltage higher with bigger currents. That is a phony system and not (ree +nergy.

2le8ander Hain
?e found a good number of earth battery designs in the 3atent Iegistry. The earliest designs appear in !%4! when 2le8ander Hain applied the phenomenon to telegraphy. ?hile wor-ing a telegraph line& he chanced to discover that his leads had become immersed in water. This short0circuit through earthed water did not stop the actions which resounded through his system. *r. Hain too- the ne8t step to greater distance& burying copper plates and ;inc plates with a mile of ground between them. ?hen connected to a telegraph line& these performed remar-ably well without any other battery assistance. Hain obtained the patent for his earth battery years after his initial discovery 9!%4!:& using it to drive telegraph systems and cloc-s. 9real free energy system using earth energy only:

)tephen 4ail 9!%36: observed the same effect& not -nowing what caused it. The establishment of the first functional telegraph line seemed to re1uire even fewer batteries with time. 4ail began with some twelve large battery cups& reducing them gradually until only two were needed. There came a point during certain operative seasons where he found it possible to remove all the batteries! ..?. ?il-ins in +ngland 9!%45: corroborated findings made by Hain& developing a similar earth battery for use in telegraphic service. 2n early +nglish 3atent appears in !%$4 by .ohn >aworth& the first true composite earth battery. This battery is drum0 shaped & having numerous solid discs mounted on an insulative a8is& end0braced& and buried. Their power was rated in terms of disc diameter and telegraph line distanceA one foot diameter discs for seventy0five miles of line& two foot discs for up to four hundred and forty miles of line.

Momposite earth battery

+8perimental modulated earth battery

The e8periment is to modulate the earth current. <t wor-s just li-e a modulated current source in a solid state amplifier& only this battery supplies the current. 2n e8ample would be a strain gauge circuit.

This mystery persisted for years. < have tal-ed to some older engineers who report that local telegraph stations remained in operation despite the fact that their batteries had not been recharged for a great number of years. ?hen the battery was e8amined it was actually dried out and physically corroded. Jet the signals continued.

<n devices called 'radionic' tuners by those who developed them& numerous

investigations revealed the potentials of ground energy for social use. 2gricultural applications of radionic tuners produced greater crop yields. *oreover& large ground0 connected radionic tuners produced e8traordinary effects on the mind and emotions.... relieving tensions and opening thought to new potentials. (rom this viewpoint& telegraph systems behaved as radionic tuners on a vast scale. ?e would therefore e8pect them to produce anomalous energetic effects in several parameters of human e8perience.

Cosmo-Electro Culture, The Cosmic Forces

Test amplifier to transmit low power signals into the ground

Ieceiver amplifier with $#>; notch filter.

<n my test of an 'earth battery system using grounding rods'& when transmitting audio fre1uencies the weeds grew wildly. The normal weeds were so big that it too- a tractor to cut them down.... <t was found that tubes wor- the best.

Ground Radio

7et's try an e8periment in earth energies.

Touching a well0grounded iron rod is a good first e8periment to try in these regards. Try and find a place where power lea-age into the ground is minimal..... such as in a par- or wooded area. Ta-e a yard0long solid iron rod whose surface is free of shellac or insulator coatings. Marefully drive the rod into the ground with a hammer. ?etted hands on the iron should produce a mild electrical sensation. These voltages may be measured. They 'pin' sensitive galvanometers. The current does not cease after several wee-s of activity& when the rods are properly placed. *ost recogni;ed that electricity was simply a by0product or epiphenomenon of a more fundamental agency which entered the grounded lines. Iheostats somehow 'tuned' the potential of this earth energy. <t was found possible to 'match and tune' these energies through the use of rheostats and capacitors. 9medical connection: 3ersons who were wea- and infirm actually e8perienced vitali;ing elevations when connected to the ground energy through these special rheostatic tuners.
E-Mail john1@icehouse.net

)tubblefield Mell

The )tubblefield Mell

?illiam F .)now 3atent R !55&/#"

<mprovement in earth batteries for generating electricity. S B Sinc M B Marbon

.. Merpau8. 3atent R !%/&%#/

+lectric03iles

Earth Batteries

The transmitter below was used in my e8periments. < used switching through a special antenna using large discs !# inches in diameter insulated from the mast 3# feet above the earth .

?e do not -now the secret of the earth charge as ,athan )tubblefield determined it. Dthers since his time have observed fluctuations at certain times of the year in ground energy. <t may be that a sudden induction is re1uired before the e8cess ground charge surges to the surface..... li-e priming a pump. )o < did some e8periments in building different types of cells. < used a !# inch carriage bolt 3/4 inch diameter between two delron spacers. < used steel wire and copper wire that was coated. < would wind one layer and sand it off& chec- for shorts& and then wrap it with gau;e and start the ne8t winding. < then put the secondary induction coil windings on.

These are the results < got in a one gallon plastic jug filled with water. 4olts .#6& /5#ma into dead short through meter shunt. <'m still wor-ing on a better cell to go into the ground at this time. )tubblefield published an e8traordinary brochure in !%"% to attract investors who had e8pressed interest in consolidating a small corporation around his wor-. <n this brochure& )tubblefield insisted that power for his device was not generated in the cell. >e calmly stated that the cell received its surplus energy from the earth. <n a less discussed portion of the brochure& )tubblefield stated that 'electrotherapeutic' devices had been developed from his earth battery. Dther researchers made similar claims for their earth batteries 9>ic-s& *ellon:. Furing this time& )tubblefield declared that news& weather& and other announcements could be broadcast through the ground across a great territory for private reception. >e also added that simultaneous messages and news of all -inds would soon be transmitted through the ground from a central distribution station. 9)hades of Tesla!: <n !"#/ )tubblefield set up one of his sets in a '*ainstreet' upper office... in a hardware shop. (rom that point to his farm 9some $### feet distant: he conducted continuous conversations with his son Hernard. Tapping with a pencil on his one0 piece transceiver& Hernard was 1uic-ly heard in a loud& very clear voice. This transceiver was a carbon button placed in a tin snuff bo8. )peech and response were transacted through the same device& which acted as both microphone and loudspea-er. Mells 9+2IT> H2TT+I<+): were placed downstairs from the office in the ground. They were never removed and never wore out& though operating twenty0four hours a day around the cloc-. ,athan )tubblefield offered to construct a large scale power station for the town of *urray. >is 1uoted initial installation costs were estimated at five thousand dollars. The town politicians declined the offer. 2s a result& the techni1ue of drawing up electricity from the earth remains a mystery.

The )tubblefield ground radio system was demonstrated for appro8imately one thousand *urray residents. 3hotographs of )tubblefield and his family& and a good crowd of witnesses from town& show the cell laying on the ground among all his assembled inventionsN and a flower0pot si;ed coil of good volume. Dther devices show motors and large capacitor stac-s for aerial voice transmission e8periments. )tubblefield declares it to be an 'energy receiver....a receptive cell for intercepting electrical ground waves'. <ts conductive ability somehow absorbs and directs the enormous volumes of earth energy. ?hether the current derived from this cell is electricity as we -now it has been 1uestioned. Dne indicator is not found when considering his use of the energy in lighting lamps. ?ith this energy ,athan )tubblefield operated a score of arc lamps at full brightness for twenty0four hours a day. There was a definite trigger by which this energy was stimulated and maintained. The induction coil which bears his name is e1uipped with three coils which are wrapped around and upon a heavy iron core. Hare iron wire and cotton0covered copper wire are wrapped side by side& comprising a primary coil body. +ach layer of the primary coil body is covered by a band of cotton insulation& bringing four wire leads to the coil terminus. Two leads of iron and two of copper are e8ternal to the coil. Mommercial electrical power is obtained through these connective terminals. <n addition to this bimetallic winding& there is a third windingA the 'secondary'. This third coil is insulated from the primary bimetallic coil& serving as a trigger device.

3resumably& a stimulating impulse shoc- was introduced into the tertiary coil& after which the upwelling electrical ground response brought forth powerful currents in both iron and copper coils. +lectrolytically 9as a battery in acid or saltwater: the )tubblefield coil is disappointing& producing less then one volt according to those who have duplicated its construction. )tubblefield's bimetallic coil was a 'plug'A a receiver which intercepts the vast and free electrical reservoir of the ground itself. >is patent and subse1uent company brochures define the manner in which his earth battery was to be activated. Technically& the )tubblefield device is a modified thermocouple 9a bimetal in tight surface contact: but a thermocouple could not supply the degree of power which he reported. ?hile this arrangement could develop a few milliwatts of power in appropriately hot ground spots& the thermoelectric e8planation of the device cannot e8plain the phenomenal output reported in the news reports of )tubblefield's demonstrations. (urthermore& though the )tubblefield power receiver is wound li-e an induction coil& it produces a steady direct current output. This poses additional problems for the conventional engineer. +lectrical induction only occurs with electrical alternations& oscillations& and impulses.

,athan and Hernard )tubblefield& with wireless telephone .anuary !& !"#/ ?itnesses describe ground0powered motors which ran unceasingly and unattended for months without need for replacing or replenishing the ground battery. )mall machinery& cloc-s& and loud gongs were run by other ground0buried cells as reported by credible witnesses. )tubblefield may have discovered the auto0magnifying voltage effect of electrostatic induction in coils before Tesla& who later utili;ed the effect in his special electrostatic Transformers.

<s this the first induction pulse motor=

These buried coils may have become saturated with earth electrostatic energy& which travelled from subterranean depths. <n such a case& the mere battery power of the coil was replaced by the electrostatic flow& the coil acting as an electrode. This seems obvious when considering the fact that its ordinary battery current 9! watt: was gradually replaced by continually growing electrical current of far greater proportion.

"bse13ations made at %ittsb51gh7 %a(7 comm5nicated b6 E(W( ULGAN7 !eleg1aph manage1( D51ing A5g( )<th the intensit6 o0 the c511ent e3ol3ed 01om it 3a1ied 3e16 m5ch7 being at times no st1onge1 than an o1dina16 batte167 and then s5ddenl6 changing the poles o0 the magnets it 4o5ld s4eep th1o5gh them7 cha1ging them to thei1 5tmost capacit67 and compelling a cessation o0 4o1: 4hile it contin5ed( "n the mo1ning o0 Sept( )d7 at m6 1e=5est the %hiladelphia ope1ato1 detached his batte167 mine being al1ead6 o00( We then 4o1:ed 4ith each othe1 at inte13als as long as the a51o1al c511ent contin5ed7 4hich 3a1ied 01om thi1t6 to ninet6 seconds( D51ing these 4o1:ing inte13als 4e e>changed messages 4ith m5ch satis0action7 and 4e 4o1:ed mo1e steadil6 4hen the batte1ies 4e1e o00 than 4hen the6 4e1e attached( "n the night o0 A5g( )<th the batte1ies 4e1e attached7 and on b1ea:ing the ci1c5it the1e 4e1e seen not onl6 spa1:s ,that do not appea1 in the no1mal condition o0 a 4o1:ing line- b5t at inte13als 1eg5la1 st1eams o0 0i1e7 4hich7 had the6 been pe1mitted to last mo1e than an instant7 4o5ld ce1tainl6 ha3e 05sed the platin5m points o0 the :e67 and the helices became so hot that the hand co5ld not be :ept on them( !hese e00ects co5ld not ha3e p1od5ced b6 the batte1ies(? In '<@87 the Ame1ican Ale>ande1 G1aham Bell s5cceeded in de3eloping a p1actical telephone( !he 0i1st telephones 05nctioned so that a telephone 1ecei3e1 4as installed at both ends o0 a 4i1e( !he ea1th 05nctioned as the 1et51n 4i1e( Batte1ies 4e1e not necessa16 beca5se the telephone 1ecei3e1's pe1manent magnet roduced an electrical current in the coil when a magneticall! conducti"e mem#rane was acti"ated #! s eech. Finland$s %irst tele hone connection was #uilt during &ecem#er o% 1'(( in )elsin*i. < have been wor-ing in the energy field for over 3# years& < have come to the conclusion that their is no '(ree +lectricity'. Their is only a potential radiant charge that ma-es up a dipole. This energy ma-es up everything we touch and use in our electrical circuits as we -now them. The electrical circuits as we -now them are flawed& meaning they burn up the dipole that is free in nature.

<f you -ill the dipole you loose the energy. The dipole -iller is the electron current in the circuit. )o therefore the term free electricity only applies to those that have done away with the current or have figured a way to bloc- it from completing it's path through the circuit. Their are no meters to measure this radiant current& and when you catch it& it has the power of the universe and beyond. Good luc- in your research . Their is only energy from the vacuum& -nown as radiant energy. to find out more about this you need to read Tom Hearden's boo-. To go to my pages go to the bottom of the page .

These patents are the only -ey to unloc-ing this radiant energy. 3erhaps it is better in this present world of ours that a revolutionary idea or invention instead of being helped and patted be hampered and ill0treated in its adolescence0 by want of means& by selfish interest& pedantery& stupidity and ignoranceN that it be attac-ed and stifled N that it pass through bitter trials and tribulations& through the heartless strife of commercial e8istence. )o all that was great in the past was ridiculed& condemned& combatted& suppressed 0 only to emerge all the more powerfully& all the more triumphantly from the struggle. ,. Tesla

'Today's scientist have substituted mathematics for e8periments and they wander off through e1uation after e1uation and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.' ,i-ola Tesla >ere in the Tesla patent once again we see the use of radiant energy. 2s < have said above their is only a radiant current& and this current is passed through the system by the capacitor and only a capacitor. The ne8t step in the system is the amount of time it ta-es to charge this capacitor& and then the amount of time it ta-es to discharge the capacitor for they all have their own time& and each one of these things must be in sync in their own time. <t is so funny to sit here now and thin- that Henjamin (ran-lin had it all at his finger tips& if he would have used the capacitor the correct way. <t's the most simple thing in nature to do& and the hardest for man-ind to understand because of the mind bloc-s. Their is no math for radiant current& for are instruments do not measure it. <t's even sic- to see meters all over these machines& because their is no possible way to measure the 2ether flow. The people have had it all along and yet a little 'meter' has stood in their way from the truth. *eters only measure wasted energy in the system. Jes here it is& T>+ I+27 *cMoy

9all patents are core technology& now using inverted radiant circuits: HT< systems <nc.

Iadiant currents are just li-e Tesla said a gas in nature the transformation converter is the Mapacitor. 2n answer to Favid Thomson Favid this is great stuff and < admire your wor-& but the dipole we are tal-ing about are two different things. first of all the math does not apply since their are no e1uations for it. The math of today's scientist only runs you around in e1uation after e1uation& 'just li-e Tesla said'. 2ll are electrical e1uations are only designed to burn energy in current. < understand the The Masimir effect& but this does not have anything to do with the charge of a magnetic moment. this does not ta-e any high voltage since the stress field is always there. Dur circuits are designed to split the magnetic moment before it becomes magnetic& this is where the radiant comes from. <f we go bac- to Tesla and what he was doing in the end we find out he was studying through small e8periments how this Iadiant gas behaved& and what shapes it wor-ed best with. >is wor- with different lattice was very detailed and this is where The Masimir effect comes into play. 2s for the Iadiant wor- their only three patents by Tesla which discusses anything& and no math. The only thing we have to use at this time is 4O without the < 9current: but it should be 4r BO 9 voltage from the split Iadiant B Mharge: The only other factor is T<*+ to get the 4r. <f a long time is re1uired to collect charge in this split then M 9capacitor: should be very small so that the highest 4 9voltage: is obtained. <f the 4r is very 1uic- in splitting this magnetic moment then

M can be very big. 2lso fre1uency of this magnetic moment is very important. Jou must release the Iadiant voltage into a radiant current de0void of any electrons. )o what is charging the batteries in *y system is pure Iadiant Murrent. This means that since their is no electrons to pile up on the <ons of the battery nothing can move& this forces the <ons to change their state and they move on their own& this is nothing more then a impedance shift& if you have a low impedance in the battery you have real power& if you have high impedance in the battery you have nothing. ,ature ta-es time to move at her own rate& so the battery may ta-e a long time to charge but charge it will with a different form of energy. This brings me to a different point& That all that is driving the switching solid state wise is a difference in potential across the battery inverted. This then means that the whole flow theory is out the window& meaning that the semiconductors are wor-ing on potential charge de0void of electrons so their is no heat generated in the semiconductor. 2s for the battery it fill's in it's own electrons. < must say that Tesla was right. .ohn 2nswer Two Favid and Farren (irst of all with all due respect and admiration for your wor-& < must still state that *y wor- has nothing to do with ')trong Mharge'& or Iesonance in our circuits. *y woris based on real wor-ing models& and these real wor-ing models are saying something much different than what the e1uations are saying. *y magnetic moment is based on what is occurring in the front end circuit before the normal current builds up& and then to capture the radiant voltage and then split this voltage into a current de0void of electrons to charge the batteries. )o here we differ again <'m not loo-ing for electrons to power anything& in your model you can not get away from the electrons. *y models are telling me that the e1uations must be revised to wor- properly with *y model. < not only have one model that is wor-ing < have 3# that do the same thing plus the solid state models. Iadiant energy goes away when electrons enter the picture. Iead very carefully what Tesla said about the power stations when they were FM powered& < thin- you will catch it. < have never seen anybody that did science right do the e1uations before they had a wor-ing model on the bench. 2lso it's not '3rofessional' to spea- of another fellow scientists wor-ing in the field as regurgitated Hearden concepts& when nobody has chec- the references to find out if he is right. < have wor-ed with Tom Hearden for 3# Tyears and those theories come from my bench models that are wor-ing. ,ow others are getting to first base and soon they will be on third base& soon you will see these machines powering loads and charging their own batteries& then where will all the math models sit= <f my patents were understood it would be found out that the *ono 3ole motor is not a *otor& it is a mechanical Iadiant oscillator with a one to one transformer inductively triggered. being a one to one transformer you can not get more out then you put in& unless something else is flowing through it& it does not fit the math models& so this washes the forward converter theory down the drain. < say this& if < ta-e your model and

understand it correctly& everybody should have their lights burning right now! ?hat bench model do you have running on this theory= < say these things to you with all do respect for your hard wor-. .ohn Hedini (or more discussions www.icehouse.net/john!/inde8!##.htm

These pages are for serious researchers only& doing serious wor-. < do not have time to answer 1uestions on where you buy magnets or how you wind coils. Jou must be an engineering type of person and have machine e8perience. <n the future < will be putting up pages on other systems according to Tom Hearden's new boo-. +nergy (rom The 4acuum Moncepts U3rinciples Jou may order this boo- from the Tom Hearden ?ebsite at www.cheniere.org/

< will be adding e8periments& with the concepts of ,athan )tubblefield's wor- on ground wave transmission. < have completed my test and have had very good results with over !# miles distance& even through the water pipes& rivers& streams in the local area. The circuits involved in these transmissions involve vacuum tubes and high voltage. The researcher is warned that if you have no e8perience in ground wave radio transmission and (MM rules and regulations& stay away from these e8periments. < ta-e no responsibility for ' your ' actions& and you e8periment at your own ris-. <f you cause interference to anything& you must stop your e8periments& because the fine will be something you will never forget. Hy doing these e8periments& you assume all responsibility. Jou will be shoc-ed to see that you need no I( 9 Iadio (re1uency: whatsoever. <n the days of ,athan )tubblefield& they did not even understand the vacuum tube& so ,athan built many induction transformers to do this communication. <f the e8periments are understood & one may find that a whole new e8perimental field is now open. Hy phasing the transmission. it is possible to generate 3F special systems in sound and voice.

Ouote from )tubblefieldA ' < have solved the problem of telephoning without wires through the earth as )ignor *arconi has of sending signals through space.'

St5bble0ield in his 4o1:shop!o get insight into St5bble0ield go to 444(nathanst5bble0ield(comand o1de1 the boo: Fo1 the pages on Nathan St5bble0ield go to444(iceho5se(net/Aohn'/st5bble0ield(htmlwww.icehouse.net/john!/inde8!!.html

/# Hedini0Hearden Jears (ree +nergy Generation

)pecial than-s to all the groups who -ept the faith.

.ohn Hedini discharging the radiant energy from the storage capacitors.

The current appears after the radiant discharge.

Tom Hearden !"%4 )imple (ree +nergy *otor

Dn this slide& we show a theoretical scheme which several researchers have discovered and used to build simple free energy motors. <n this scheme& we drive an ordinary d.c. series motor by a two wire system from an ordinary battery. The motor produces shaft horsepower& at 00 say 00 some 3# or 4# percent efficiency& compared to the power drained from the battery. This much of the circuit is perfectly ordinary. The tric- here is to get the battery to recharge itself& without furnishing normal power to it& or e8pending wor- from the e8ternal circuit in the process. To do this& recall that a charged particle in a 'hoo-ing' del0phi river moves itself. This is true for an ion& as well as for an electron. ?e need only ma-e the del0phi in correct fashion and synchroni;e itN specifically& we must not release the hose no;;les we utili;e to produce our del0phi river or waves. The inventors who have discovered this have used various variations& but here we show a common one. (irst& we add an 'energi;er' 9often referred to by various other names: to the circuit. This device ma-es the del0phi waves we will utili;e& but does ,DT ma-e currents of electron masses. <n other words& it ma-es pure V0dot. <t ta-es a little wor- to do this& for the energi;er circuit must pump a few charges now and then. )o the energi;er

draws a little bit of power from the motor& but not very much. ,ow we add a switching device& called a controller& which brea-s up power to the motor in pulses. Furing one pulse& the battery is connected and furnishes power to the motorN during the succeeding pulse& the battery is disconnected completely from the motor and the output from the energi;er is applied across the terminals of the battery. <f fre1uency content& spin0hole content& etc. are properly constructed by the energi;er& then the ion movements in the battery reverse themselves& recharging the battery. 2gain& remember that these ions *D4+ T>+*)+74+) during this recharge phase. )pecifically& we are ,DT furnishing ordinary current to the battery& and we are not doing wor- on it from the energi;er. <f things are built properly& the battery can be made to more than recover its charge during this pulse cycle. To prevent e8cess charge of the battery and overheating and destroying it& a sensor is added which senses the state of charge of the battery& and furnishes a feedbac- signal to the controller to regulate the length of recharge time per 'power off' pulse. <n other words& the system is now self0regulating. The relation between power pulses and recharge pulses is shown on the graphs at the bottom. ,ote that regulation may decrease the time of recharge application of the del0 phi river. This system& if properly built and tuned& will furnish 'free shaft energy' continually& without violating conservation of anenergy. Iemember that the del0phi condition across the battery terminals means that spacetime is suddenly curved there& and conservation of energy need no longer apply. 2gain& this system is consistent with general relativity and with the fact that V0field alone can drive a situation relativistic. ?e have deliberately used these facts to do direct engineering. Dur 'e8tra energy' comes from shifting phi0flu8 BB the energy of the universal vacuum spacetime 00 directly into ordinary energy for our use. Thus we draw on an ine8haustible source& and our device is no more esoteric than a paddlewheel in a river. The only difference is that& in this case& we have to be clever enough to ma-e and divert the river in the right timing se1uency. This is a free energy device which an ordinary person& who -nows a little electronics& can e8periment with in the basement. To develop it& one is tal-ing several thousands of dollars and a lot of persistence and tin-eringN one is not tal-ing millions.

Tom Hearden and .ohn Hedini testing a monopole energi;er

Tom Hearden .ohn Hedini during a TQ4 test

Fual monopole motor Test

Fual monopole

Testing of the Hedini Mole circuit & The Ieal *cMoy

4 3ole *onopole motor

4 3ole *onopole motor

patent

Hedini *otor Generator first

Hedini *otor Generator first patent & charging batteries

Hedini Mole ?indow *otor

Test Hedini/Mole *otor no battery.

httpA//www.johnbedini.net/john34/bedinicolemotor.mpg

?indow *otor& Hedini/Mole This motor has been on the same batteries for over !5 years. httpA//www.johnbedini.net/john34/?indow.wmv

Tom Heardens web sight httpA//www.energyfromthevacuum.com/

'nergy from the (acuum

# *ocumentary +eries

"he biggest monopole motor charging ,-.. amp hour batteries over /.. pounds each cell.

Iunning load ban- /### watts for !# hours continuos

Hoo- reviews
2 wonderful boo- indeed! 2s one who has succussfully replicated many of these machines in many variations& < can say that this boo- is very helpful to understanding this technology. The very lengthy patent 1uoted shows many important things not shown to the public until now. The e8plinations are the clearest < have seen yet& and are very well developed. )everal new circuits are shown& as well as several methods of tapping into the 2ether. ?e have shown the public on several of these forums how you can see the over unity in the results. The benefits of this technology are really incredible. The environmental benefits are enormous. < have been able to not only

restore jun-ed batteries to useable and better condition& but also can even recharge non0recharageable batteries with the circuits shown in this boo-. (urther& < have been able to charge several batteries with only one e1ually si;e and charged battery powering the the front end. This& as < have shown& can be done by properly tuning the setup with more than one battery on the bac- end& or by placing +nergi;er coils on the freely running wheel and charging up additional batteries or loads& or even the front end load. This < have done numerous times over the last two years. This was shown in the original !"%4 boo-& which is given at the start of this boo-. This is very easy for anyone to see for themselves as many have. 2ll you have to do is ma-e the machine so that it ends up charging the charging battery to even only "#W of the rate of discharge of the primary. <f you then can charge up another battery with an energi;er off the freely spinning rotor& then what do you have if even that is only "#W of the charge and the primary is discharged= 2nyone should be able to get at least these low results. 2nd what does that show you= Hut with a little more 1uality and effort you should be able to get one fully charged battery for one fully discharged battery& with a free mechanical load that can power whatever you want& or another battery. ?ith the slightly advanced motor as shown on the lists long ago& you can swap the batteries around and continually get this free ride or e8tra charge. Jou must add in the free mechanical. Iemember& the ))G setup was the bare bones basics to show you something. This boo- goes further into the meat of the matter. The boo- has many illustrations and color pictures. (or those who were pressing for more details& here they are. +njoy! Iic- (riedrich !//#3/#$ This boo- gets an 2TTTTT!! <'ve had this boo- for a wee- now and haven't been able to put it down yet.Tom Hearden and .ohn Hedini really nail it in this one! Dn page 4$ of this boo-& it has .ohn's solidstate version of his monopole! complete with component values! ,ow people don't have any e8cuses why they can't build this because you no longer have to build a rotor! <'ve been replicating and testing Hedini's energi;ers for three years now& and was an original member of )terlings Jahoo )G group. <'ve seen some ama;ing results with my projects& but nothing li-e what <'m seeing now that <'ve built the solidstate version that is in this boo-! <'ve recharged al-aline batteries without heating them 9That <'ve seen before:. < got a ! to ! charge by using a !/volt !6a> battery to charge a !/v /5# a> battery! and& the best thing yet& < hoo-ed this Iadiant energi;er up to a water capacitor9electrolysis chamber: that was filled with sodium free spring water with ,D electrolytes and imagine my surprise when gas started streaming off the plates with only /##m2 of input! and after running it at about ! amp /#v for just over /# min& the water was still cold! < have never seen anything li-e this and <'ve e8perimented with straight FM and pulsed FM loo-ing for that 9now: fictional resonant fre1 of water. To be fair though& there are some problems

in this boo-.There are some minor typos in the bac- artical&the opto pin outs have the emitter and collecter pins bac-wards& and their is a ,3, in one of the schematics with a 3,3 part number..ust minor stuff a little common sense can over come. This boo- is truly historic and is going to blow the mind of any one open minded enough to read& consider& and e8periment. < have no doubts that .ohn and Tom are real from what <'ve seen on my bench and from what < have read in their wor-s. <s there any surprise there is a campaign to discredit them= <'m not. This whole oil business thing is fishy. 2re we really to believe some oil company is so smart to ma-e up all the details of Tom's theories and related machines& but are so stupid that they leave an obvious connection to themselves= The whole supposed oil companies site loo-s li-e some half ass web template& li-e someone put it up with Tony's address and phone number in order to discredit Hearden. >ow hard is it to get a number listed in a business directory anyhow= +ven if Tony is some oil tycoon& isn't it possible Hearden doesn't -now and is being manipulated to some degree= < don't -now& but then you have this +ric reig guy who was personaly mentored by someone who li-es to 'debun-' with slight of hand tric-s& 'The 2ma;ing Iandi'. These super s-eptics are just as bad as super gullible people. <f critical thin-ing was e8plosive& these clowns wouldn't have enough to blow their hats off. .ust -eepers of the status 1uo if you as- me. < would suggest buying this boo- before it's stopped! <t's that powerful! Fave 2 2 Dneness 3.). +ric reig& < sure hope your wor-ing on your public apology to Tom and .ohn& the truth is now out and it's only a matter of time before everyone -nows who is for real N:

The way < see the magnetic fields around the monopole system

Mircuit diagram of the monopole motor

!/ 3ole *onopole running

httpA//www.johnbedini.net/john34/*ono03ole.mpeg

.ohn Hedini running a solid state radiant amplifier oscillator& >endershot design

Hoo-s from Tom Hearden

httpA//cheniere.org/boo-s/(+G/inde8.html

!he Att1actions o0 $agnetism(

o5ld a Little hild be Leading Us into a F1ee Ene1g6 F5t51eC B6 Jeane $anning( Atlantis Rising, November 200(?), pg. 32.( The search for new energy technology ta-es us to northern <daho to meet a ten0 year0old girl who won a science fair with a battery0charging motor. )he describes it as an advanced design that e8tends the life ofbatteries for an ama;ing length oftime. The motor was designed by .ohn Hedini and built by her. ?e meet him first. *ore widely -nown as an audio0amplifiers e8pert& Hedini's name is intertwined with 'free energy' history. ?itnesses saw his machines running successfully& but later others were unable to build devices according to his published instructions. >is circuitry was mentioned favorably at a conference in )wit;erland recently.

2ware ofthe controversies& with mi8ed feelings < drove into the <daho panhandle& past a warehouse for survivalists' supplies. *y hope is that he will give clues so others can duplicate his successes. +8plaining his theory about such devices& new0energy theorist Thomas Hearden is writing prolifically this year. Ietired from electronic warfare studies and aerospace wor-& Hearden is the leading advocate of scalar potential electromagnetics& and he e8plains how the sea of energy we live inXan energetic flu8 of virtual particlesXcould be engineered to do wor- in the physical world. Hearden also has a theory about another of Hedini's 'scalar' inventions00one which can increase enjoyment of music. 2fter a si80year struggle& Hedini was granted Q) 3atent 5&4%6&#56 for a mechanism for reducing electronic distortion in digital and analog recording and playbac-. Hearden 9writing in ' plore Maga&ine (ol. 6& ,o. 4. pp. 530$3: says the patent e8aminer couldn't understand the mechanism& because Hedini's nonlinear optics process was not found in audio or classical electromagnetics te8tboo-s. *eanwhile& .ohn and his brother Gary were already selling the stress0defect0relieving devices. The process even wor-s for media such as color film. Hearden e8plains Hedini's process as self0oscillating& optical electronics& and hopes that even standard metals can eventually be treated with it to reduce stress defects. <s this negative entropy00self0ordering in the physical world= Hearden adds that most really now things are invented not by academic teams or corporate scientists but by the lone 'independent fiercely creative people.' < meet Hedini at his business& surrounded by electronics e1uipment. The bacroom loo-s li-e a museum of small prototypes of unusual motor/generators. )ome are pictured on websites httpA//rand.nidlin-.com/.ohn! or httpA//johnbedini.net/john!/tesla.html >e says his -nowledge is on the <nternet& and now it's up to others to build the devices. >e says they have to e8periment themselves& and it reminds me that he taught a little girl how to ma-e a motor which drove science teachers nutsXto see a little motor made of plastic with no return paths for the magnetics. 'The funny thing was that her father bent a coat hanger and put a coil above the motor and used it as a generator. The motor ran much longer under the load than they had e8pected.' .ohn Hedini was roaming the 'free energy' scene in Malifornia in the !"6#s and early !"%#s& collecting -nowledge about medical as well as energy devices. >e had an electronics business in )ylmar& and at home he e8perimented with windmills and other systems. The utility company objectedXhe was hoo-ed up to their power lines and if his system were to bac-feed& it could e8tinguish the lights in the neighborhood. >e disagreed. 2s he tells it& the officials' final word was 'we thin- you're stealing power' and they too- their meter off the building.

>owever& his lights were still on at night& because of his energy inventions& he tells me. (inally they struc- a dealXhe would have his power meter bac- but would pay a high fee for the service. The power company almost too- away their hoo-up to his shop& but it was in an industrial area and they would have had to remove a three0phase transformer and therefore deprive the other businesses of power. 'They found that when they switched off all the power in the shop nothing 9electrical: was being drawn& but the machines -ept running.' >e published instructions for an energy device which .im ?atson of Molorado )prings then builtXlarge0scale with a heavy flywheel. ?atson demonstrated it at the !"%4 Hicentennial symposium celebrating ,i-ola Tesla's arrival in the Q)2.

2t the same meeting Hedini displayed a circuit which charges batteries. Dnly one engineer out of the audienceX+i-e *ueller of the +uropean space agency Xgot up and measured Hedini's apparatus. >e affirmed that it was charging the batteries. Fr. >ans ,ieper's boo- 0evolution in "echnology, Medicine and +ociety states that Hedini's convener was %##W efficient in initial tests& and that /$ independent researchers successfully duplicated the device about which Hedini reported.

>owever& the staff of the no0longer0published maga;ine 'nergy 1nlimited was unable to replicate the device& and consulting engineer George >athaway critici;ed *ueller's measurements. Dn the other hand& a presenter at the !"%5 Q)F2 conference& en *oore found that his model of Hedini's G0(ield Generator increased speed as its load increased. >e also witnessed a Hedini prototype successfully operating. The same year& radio 2HM tal- show host Hill .en-ins used his guest spea-er's spot at a *arch !/ Town >all forum at the Hiltmore >otel in 7os 2ngeles to announce a free energy device& with Hedini and )teven ?erth. The two demonstrated what was described as a romrey gravity0field generator with !%#W efficiency& powered by a battery ban- which re1uired no recharging from an outside source. 2 newspaper account said the audience included public utility representatives and investment bro-ers. Hedini& then 36& told the forum that he planned to ma-e his generator universally available to the public at a nominal cost& instead of selling to the highest bidder. >e described his wor-ing model as using stressed pulsed scalar waves out of phase& to tap ;ero0point energy of the vacuum of space. The concept was not found in physics boo-s& but is perfectly natural and it wor-s& he said. .en-ins had publicly introduced concepts such as scalar interferometry through one of his radio guests& physicist Hearden. >ow did the civic officials at the Hiltmore forum react to a 'free energy demonstrationXlight bulbs strung across their luncheon plates= Hedini recalls they growled demands to remove the dam bulbs so they could eat. '(ree energy' was not a part of their reality. ?ithin a few wee-s& Hedini was visited by two thugs who were definitely unfriendly toward his efforts to unhoo- from today's power structures. They had the appearance of body0builders who had just stepped out of a gymnasium& and pushed him against his shop wall while saying in a threatening manner that they e8pect he will continue to use gasoline. >e laughs shortly while recalling the incident& but evidently -new they were serious. ,ow that he has moved to <daho& the reason 'they' don't bother Hedini any more& he figures& is that he limits his models to toy0si;e. >is model collection only demonstrates a principleYthat he believes could power a house if scaled up in si;e. The principle involves storing discharged pulses of energy that are created while doing wor- with previously stored energy. The se1uence is 'do the wor-& discharge& do the wor-& discharge' and so on. The devices operate in a manner contrary to conventional motors and generators& < am told. 'Jou want the thing to do wor-. The more wor- it does& the more energy it gathersA Hedini says.

2 recent model& incorporating a bicycle wheel with magnets glued on the inside ofthe perimeter& has a large0bladed fanYangled to slow the rotation00as the worload. Hedini unhoo-ed part of his circuit to demonstrate the spar-. >e was showing how much energy is sent bac- to the battery& continually in step. Iepeatedly the setup runs the motor for a certain length of time& shuts it off and then discharges. Hedini is scornful of e8perts who have visited him and can't understand why a small motor could be charging a battery yet the motor does not slow down. '?e understand what the energy is. Tesla -new e8actly what it was. 2nd it's the furthest thing from what they want to measure with their electron pushers.' Today's instruments all measure electron flow& he said& but no meters are available to measure what is involved in his models. ?hat& then& is Hedini dealing with= <t's electrostatic in nature& he replies& and must be converted into standard electricity. The rhythmic pop& pop& pop sound of a Hedini device comes from a blue sparwhich he describes as an ultra0violet type of arcY0similar to radio0fre1uencies but not I(. <t can be accumulated and discharged in pulses which then can be converted into electrons. <fscientists want to build a big electron0pusher& the answers are on his website& he said. >owever& Hedini has no patience with researchers who as- for specifics such as where to buy the magnets. '.ust go get them. Fon't bother me.' >e said the devices only need to be tuned& and e8act materials are not crucial. 'Qse the type of magnets that fit your wheel. <f you don't get enough output from the coils& and more windings. Dr change the geometry.' <'ll visit the little girl and see if it is that easy. +arlier this year )hawnee Haughman wanted a science fair project. )he found a boo- with plans for a motor& but it loo-ed boringYcor-s and match bo8es. >er father promised the parts for a better one. >e wor-s near .ohn Hedini& who instructed )hawnee for a couple of hours a day for a few days. )he finished building it the day before the fair. '?e only tested it for li-e a day& left it running overnight sometimes& but sometimes we'd leave it running for an hour or two hours or something.' The other -ids li-ed itN that's how it was voted 'best of show'. 2dult judges gave her the other top pri;es. )he flic-s the wheel& into motion and it runs. 'This is the electromagnet coil. <t has the power wire and the trigger wire... The power wire carries the voltage around the electromagnet coil and it goes through to the transistorYthat little blac- thingYthen it goes through the resistor and the diode and the trigger wire follows it and then the voltage flow comes

out again and returns bac- to the negative side of the battery... The electromagnet generates the power& then it spins the wheelN the electricity goes through the generator coil which lights up the light0emitting diode. Then it starts all over again.' '?e've been using this battery for a month or so now. <t's supposed to have only "## spins per nine volts& and that's a nine0volt battery& so if it were to run out then it would have run out a long time ago!' )he has only changed the battery three times since building it si8 months ago. )chools' involvement in the new energy field adds impetus. 2ndreas *anthey is an instructor who organi;ed a )tudy Group for (ree +nergy at the Technical Qniversity of Herlin& Germany. >e says the German version of my booimpelled him bac- into new0energy research. .im ?atson disappeared from the public new0energy scene a couple of years after the !"%4 demonstration& but .ohn Hedini and colleagues are sharing as much information as they believe that they can share. Hedini views children such as )hawnee as our hope for the future. This proves that the energy can be stored in a capacitor then discharged to the secondary battery. To see a school girl motor running and discharging into a light bulb& built by the real >arlen )anders. Go to johnbedini.net/john34/Hedini*otor.wmv

The )G project building a si8 coil machine johnbedini.net/john34/-ron.html

TQ4 Test
BA!!E&D !ES! F"& !#E BEDINI $"!"& GENE&A!"&
F2T+ A DMTDH+I !3& /### BA!!E&D !ES! SEEUEN EF Dne lead acid gel0cell 9!/ volts& 45# milliamps: is being utili;ed as the primary source fully charged at !/.5 volts Three 93: lead acid gel0cell batteries 9!/ volt& 45# milliamps: strapped in parallel are being used as the charge destination. The batteries are discharged to !# volts for the test purposes. Test R! starts at !#A45 2* utili;ing primary battery fully charged at !/.5 volts charging three 93: destination batteries paralleled. The destination batteries reach a charge capacity of !4 volts at !!A/# 2*. The destination batteries are then discharged to !# volts under wor-ing load to prepare for Test R/. Test R/ starts at !!A/5 2* utili;ing primary battery measured at !!.5 volts. Mharging three 93: destination batteries paralleled. The destination batteries reach a charge capacity of !4 volts at !/A5# 3*. The destination batteries are then discharged to !# volts under wor-ing load to prepare for Test R3. Test R3 starts at !A## 3* utili;ing primary battery measured at !#.5 volts. Mharging three 93: destination batteries paralleled. The destination batteries reach a charge capacity of !4 volts at !A4# 3*. The destination batteries are then discharged to !# volts under wor-ing load to prepare for Test R4. Test R4 starts at /A#5 3* utili;ing primary battery measured at ".5 volts. Mharging three 93: destination batteries paralleled. The destination batteries reach a charge capacity of !3 volts at /A4# 3*. The primary battery is now discharged to " volts under wor-ing load and unable to further run the !"!AL BA!!E&IES #A&GEDF

!/ lead acid gel0cell batteries 9!/ volts& 45# milliamps each:. This ratio is a !/ to ! charging factor. The motor operation 9wor-: being performed as this was done is not included as an additional factor in this test.

+tu##le%ield-,nlimited -ower %rom the Ground

This may be the last hope when the power systems go down and there is no more fuel..... ?e will ta-e the power from the ground and learn how to use the earth for the good of all. This wor- is based on the boo- '7ost )cience' by Gerry 4assilatos. < have just pointed out the important parts in red& but < have hundreds of hours in the circuit designs. 3eter 7indemann pointed out this wor- to me two years ago. )ince then < have wor-ed with the )tubblefield technology and many others. Go to 3eter's pages here httpA//www.free0energy.cc/ '2fter the third tribulation& a new source of energy will be discovered that taps the +arth *agnetic field.' 0>opi 3rophecy

St5bble0ield
!his is m6 1esea1ch on Nathan St5bble0ield( 9#ello7 &ain6(9 0 <n !%"/& ignorant of the wireless inventions of the past $# years& ,athan creates an electromagnetic induction wireless telephone and demonstrates it to his friend Iainey ?ells. 2 few years later& ,athan develops a superior wireless telephone that uses natural conduction through the earth and water.
Hob 7ochte has done an enormous amount of wor- uncovering papers& notes and pictures& and 1uotes on ,athan )tubblefield. There is one pu;;ling thing to me about the )tubblefield device. <t seems to me that Tesla is standing in one of the pictures. < have chec-ed the references and& yes& Tesla is in the picture. ,ow that < understand this& it brings me to the conclusion that the waves )tubblefield used were longitudinal in nature.

Meucci hearing through wires

+ven without )tubblefield& *arconi still wouldn't be the true inventor of radio 0 ,i-ola Tesla invented it before *arconi. *arconi& in fact& used Tesla's own patents as research materials. !esla7 in t51n7 4as among the c51io5s onloo:e1s in attendance at St5bble0ield's ';.) 4i1eless demonst1ation in %hiladelphia(

)tubblefield also developed a battery to power this system and a motor& that we will get into later. ,ow around !%6% 2mos Folbear files a patent on what he called induction wireless telephone& demonstrated publicly in the us& Manada& and +urope in !%%/ and !%%3& patented in Q.).!%%$. ?hat is ama;ing to me is that the patent uses an elevated capacitance. )o this is not the same as a >erti;an wave transmitter. <t is very clear that the capacitance acts as the antenna and the return is using the earth as ground. The induction coil is used as a high self0inductance only& creating a very high potential or stress in the aether.

',ow&' Tesla writes later on about the transmitter that he was developing& '< attac-ed vigorously the development of my magnifying transmitter& now however& not so much with the original intention of producing one of great power& as with the object of learning how to construct the best one. This is essentially& a circuit of high self0 induction and small resistance 9 -ey words coming up: which in its arrangement& mode of e8citation and section and action& may be said to be the diametrical opposite of a transmitting circuit typical of telegraphy by >ert;ian or electromagnetic radiations.'

?hat )tubblefield had discovered and what he do with his system.

)tubblefield was e8perimenting with ground radio since !%%/& but did not patent his developments until much later. Mredible witnesses saw his ground radio e8periments in action during this time frame& establishing the historical priority of )tubblefield.?hile *arconi could barely send telegraphic 'dots and dash' signals with great difficultythrough a static0filled medium& ,athan )tubblefield had already transmitted the human voice with loud& velvet clarity. Dthers would adopt and implement the Mollins system 9(essenden& Fe(orest& Hethenod& Hraun:& but none could duplicate the )tubblefield )ystem. ,i-ola Tesla performed double ground e8periments with impulses as early as !%"/& reporting these in lectures and patenting some embodiments in !"#!. ,ot one of theselater systems ever achieved the same results of clarity& tone& and volume of )tubblefield ground telephony. Tesla apparently never discovered the true powerpoints which powered )tubblefield's device. 3riority in all these arts belongs to ,athan )tubblefield alone. <n addition& his was the only system in which natural energies were obtained& magnified& and entirely employed as the empowering source. 2ll other inventors used 'artificial' sources 9batteries& alternators& dynamos:.

(ollowing all these ground radio demonstrations& )tubblefield researched '*agnetic ?aves' and developed several systems which did not use ground terminals for e8changing signals. 7ong distance wireless telephone communications were his aim. *any imagined this to be radio as we -now it& but several features of )tubblefield aerial are distinctive and different. (irst his transmitters and receivers were telephonic& not telegraphic. <n his preliminary e8periments& the earth battery was used to energi;e an apparatus to which was connected a long hori;ontal aerial line. *arconi later adopted this 'bent 7' symmetry in conjunction with a grounded copper conduction screen. There are no photographs of these arrays& but < have hand0written manuscript copies of certain diary notes in which a progressively greater telephonic distance is reported. ,athan )tubblefield made steady progress in this form of telephonic transmission & but used neither alternators nor spar- discharge. *r. )tubblefield reasoned that& since electrical waves traverse the whole earth& it might be possible to send signals to distant places. These ground0permeating natural electrical waves might serve as carriers for the human voice. The ground would act as both power generator and signal conductor. 7i-e a gale carrying messages downwind& these electrical waves could bring wireless communications instantly to any part of the world. These transmissions were made through the ground itself and used the )tubblefield cell for power. <n several photographs we see special loud spea-ing telephones outfitted with 9! foot: horns& designed to act as annunciators. Malls from these annunciators brought his son Hernard to the telephone transmitter. The system was never switched off. 3ower was limitless and did not diminish with time of the day or length of use.

,atural observations in systems led to une8pected& theory0busting discoveries. )uch an effect demonstrates that an articulate 1uasi0intelligent energy permeates the natural environment.... an energy of which electricity is a minor part. Two more mysteries have lingered from this latter period of invention in the )tubblefield biography. The nature of each reveals the e8tent to which he had developed and advanced his new earth power technology. ,athan continued to pursue his e8periments& but little was seen of him for long time periods. 2lone and tired& ,athan stopped wor-ing his farm completely. 7ater& <nvestigators entered his land area and found heavy wires leading from the roots of trees. To these wires were attached small arc lamps& hung in the trees. These were e8tinguished. They imagined the arc lamps to be the e8planation of his hillside sunlight. Their hasty analysis proved problematic from stories which witnesses report. The warm and diffused sunlight which came from the ground itself around his house was not locali;ed in specific lamps. The light came from the ground& not from the trees as before... a 'whole hillside that would blossom with light'... 'lit up li-e daytime'. These observations indicate that )tubblefield had managed indeed the direct conversion of earth energy to light and warmth. This would acceptable& were *r. )tubblefield simply wor-ing on a newer form of drawing electricity from the ground to light small arc0lampsN a feat which he had accomplished earlier. Hut these -ind persons could never find any evidence of arc0lighting or any other form of -nown lighting anywhere near the area. <n their own words 'the light seemed to come out from the ground itself'. <n addition to ground sunlight effects& many heard very loud and unfamiliar noises coming from the whole area surrounding his cabin. ?hat could this be= >ad he managed to directly transduce the natural impulses of the ground energy into audio= >is last claim two wee-s before his death was made to a -ind neighborA 'The past is nothing. < have perfected now the greatest invention the world has ever -nown..... < have ta-en light from the air and earth.... as < did sound.' ,eighbors had not seen ,athan for several days. 2s they were worried about his health& they attempted to call on him. The loc- was secured from the inside. <t was a lonely& cold and rainy *arch day when old friends and neighbors bro-e the loc- on ,athan's cabin and entered. >e had passed away in his bed& the probable victim of malnutrition and fatigue. They all noticed that the interior of the cabin was 'toasty

warm'& as if heated by a strong fire. *oved to locate the source of this heat& town officials found ' two highly polished metal mirrors which faced each other& radiating a very great heat in rippling waves' This is a great discovery. <t fulfills what ,athan reported in his last testimony. This picture was sent in by Gandolf Gwynn. >e wanted to -now who was hiding behind the tree= The man behind the tree is Fr. ?ill *ason.

The rods in the picture are about /# feet apart in a straight line. ,athan )tubblefield receiving a message.

,athan )tubblefield used earth magnetic currents. this is not current as we -now it. +lectricity is a wasted product of this magnetic current.

The +lectrical Dcean.

<f you are building an earth battery it is best to do it as the patent calls out. This means that you should not use anything that causes a forced voltage. <t was not until later that people used sulfur ca-es and other acids to get the voltage higher with bigger currents. That is a phony system and not (ree +nergy.

2le8ander Hain
?e found a good number of earth battery designs in the 3atent Iegistry. The earliest designs appear in !%4! when 2le8ander Hain applied the phenomenon to telegraphy. ?hile wor-ing a telegraph line& he chanced to discover that his leads had become immersed in water. This short0circuit through earthed water did not stop the actions which resounded through his system. *r. Hain too- the ne8t step to greater distance& burying copper plates and ;inc plates with a mile of ground between them. ?hen connected to a telegraph line& these performed remar-ably well without any other battery assistance. Hain obtained the patent for his earth battery years after his initial discovery 9!%4!:& using it to drive telegraph systems and cloc-s. 9real free energy system using earth energy only:

)tephen 4ail 9!%36: observed the same effect& not -nowing what caused it. The establishment of the first functional telegraph line seemed to re1uire even fewer batteries with time. 4ail began with some twelve large battery cups& reducing them gradually until only two were needed. There came a point during certain operative seasons where he found it possible to remove all the batteries! ..?. ?il-ins in +ngland 9!%45: corroborated findings made by Hain& developing a similar earth battery for use in telegraphic service. 2n early +nglish 3atent appears in !%$4 by .ohn >aworth& the first true composite earth battery. This battery is drum0 shaped & having numerous solid discs mounted on an insulative a8is& end0braced& and buried. Their power was rated in terms of disc diameter and telegraph line distanceA one foot diameter discs for seventy0five miles of line& two foot discs for up to four hundred and forty miles of line.

Momposite earth battery

+8perimental modulated earth battery

The e8periment is to modulate the earth current. <t wor-s just li-e a modulated current source in a solid state amplifier& only this battery supplies the current. 2n e8ample would be a strain gauge circuit.

This mystery persisted for years. < have tal-ed to some older engineers who report that local telegraph stations remained in operation despite the fact that their batteries had not been recharged for a great number of years. ?hen the battery was e8amined it was actually dried out and physically corroded. Jet the signals continued.

<n devices called 'radionic' tuners by those who developed them& numerous

investigations revealed the potentials of ground energy for social use. 2gricultural applications of radionic tuners produced greater crop yields. *oreover& large ground0 connected radionic tuners produced e8traordinary effects on the mind and emotions.... relieving tensions and opening thought to new potentials. (rom this viewpoint& telegraph systems behaved as radionic tuners on a vast scale. ?e would therefore e8pect them to produce anomalous energetic effects in several parameters of human e8perience.

Cosmo-Electro Culture, The Cosmic Forces

Test amplifier to transmit low power signals into the ground

Ieceiver amplifier with $#>; notch filter.

<n my test of an 'earth battery system using grounding rods'& when transmitting audio fre1uencies the weeds grew wildly. The normal weeds were so big that it too- a tractor to cut them down.... <t was found that tubes wor- the best.

Ground Radio

7et's try an e8periment in earth energies.

Touching a well0grounded iron rod is a good first e8periment to try in these regards. Try and find a place where power lea-age into the ground is minimal..... such as in a par- or wooded area. Ta-e a yard0long solid iron rod whose surface is free of shellac or insulator coatings. Marefully drive the rod into the ground with a hammer. ?etted hands on the iron should produce a mild electrical sensation. These voltages may be measured. They 'pin' sensitive galvanometers. The current does not cease after several wee-s of activity& when the rods are properly placed. *ost recogni;ed that electricity was simply a by0product or epiphenomenon of a more fundamental agency which entered the grounded lines. Iheostats somehow 'tuned' the potential of this earth energy. <t was found possible to 'match and tune' these energies through the use of rheostats and capacitors. 9medical connection: 3ersons who were wea- and infirm actually e8perienced vitali;ing elevations when connected to the ground energy through these special rheostatic tuners.
E-Mail john1@icehouse.net

)tubblefield Mell

The )tubblefield Mell

?illiam F .)now 3atent R !55&/#"

<mprovement in earth batteries for generating electricity. S B Sinc M B Marbon

.. Merpau8. 3atent R !%/&%#/

+lectric03iles

Earth Batteries

The transmitter below was used in my e8periments. < used switching through a special antenna using large discs !# inches in diameter insulated from the mast 3# feet above the earth .

?e do not -now the secret of the earth charge as ,athan )tubblefield determined it. Dthers since his time have observed fluctuations at certain times of the year in ground

energy. <t may be that a sudden induction is re1uired before the e8cess ground charge surges to the surface..... li-e priming a pump. )o < did some e8periments in building different types of cells. < used a !# inch carriage bolt 3/4 inch diameter between two delron spacers. < used steel wire and copper wire that was coated. < would wind one layer and sand it off& chec- for shorts& and then wrap it with gau;e and start the ne8t winding. < then put the secondary induction coil windings on.

These are the results < got in a one gallon plastic jug filled with water. 4olts .#6& /5#ma into dead short through meter shunt. <'m still wor-ing on a better cell to go into the ground at this time. )tubblefield published an e8traordinary brochure in !%"% to attract investors who had e8pressed interest in consolidating a small corporation around his wor-. <n this brochure& )tubblefield insisted that power for his device was not generated in the cell. >e calmly stated that the cell received its surplus energy from the earth. <n a less discussed portion of the brochure& )tubblefield stated that 'electrotherapeutic' devices had been developed from his earth battery. Dther researchers made similar claims for their earth batteries 9>ic-s& *ellon:. Furing this time& )tubblefield declared that news& weather& and other announcements could be broadcast through the ground across a great territory for private reception. >e also added that simultaneous messages and news of all -inds would soon be transmitted through the ground from a central distribution station. 9)hades of Tesla!: <n !"#/ )tubblefield set up one of his sets in a '*ainstreet' upper office... in a hardware shop. (rom that point to his farm 9some $### feet distant: he conducted continuous conversations with his son Hernard. Tapping with a pencil on his one0 piece transceiver& Hernard was 1uic-ly heard in a loud& very clear voice. This transceiver was a carbon button placed in a tin snuff bo8. )peech and response were transacted through the same device& which acted as both microphone and loudspea-er. Mells 9+2IT> H2TT+I<+): were placed downstairs from the office in the ground.

They were never removed and never wore out& though operating twenty0four hours a day around the cloc-. ,athan )tubblefield offered to construct a large scale power station for the town of *urray. >is 1uoted initial installation costs were estimated at five thousand dollars. The town politicians declined the offer. 2s a result& the techni1ue of drawing up electricity from the earth remains a mystery.

The )tubblefield ground radio system was demonstrated for appro8imately one thousand *urray residents. 3hotographs of )tubblefield and his family& and a good crowd of witnesses from town& show the cell laying on the ground among all his assembled inventionsN and a flower0pot si;ed coil of good volume. Dther devices show motors and large capacitor stac-s for aerial voice transmission e8periments. )tubblefield declares it to be an 'energy receiver....a receptive cell for intercepting electrical ground waves'. <ts conductive ability somehow absorbs and directs the enormous volumes of earth energy. ?hether the current derived from this cell is electricity as we -now it has been 1uestioned. Dne indicator is not found when considering his use of the energy in lighting lamps. ?ith this energy ,athan )tubblefield operated a score of arc lamps at full brightness for twenty0four hours a day. There was a definite trigger by which this energy was stimulated and maintained. The induction coil which bears his name is e1uipped with three coils which are wrapped around and upon a heavy iron core. Hare iron wire and cotton0covered

copper wire are wrapped side by side& comprising a primary coil body. +ach layer of the primary coil body is covered by a band of cotton insulation& bringing four wire leads to the coil terminus. Two leads of iron and two of copper are e8ternal to the coil. Mommercial electrical power is obtained through these connective terminals. <n addition to this bimetallic winding& there is a third windingA the 'secondary'. This third coil is insulated from the primary bimetallic coil& serving as a trigger device. 3resumably& a stimulating impulse shoc- was introduced into the tertiary coil& after which the upwelling electrical ground response brought forth powerful currents in both iron and copper coils. +lectrolytically 9as a battery in acid or saltwater: the )tubblefield coil is disappointing& producing less then one volt according to those who have duplicated its construction. )tubblefield's bimetallic coil was a 'plug'A a receiver which intercepts the vast and free electrical reservoir of the ground itself. >is patent and subse1uent company brochures define the manner in which his earth battery was to be activated. Technically& the )tubblefield device is a modified thermocouple 9a bimetal in tight surface contact: but a thermocouple could not supply the degree of power which he reported. ?hile this arrangement could develop a few milliwatts of power in appropriately hot ground spots& the thermoelectric e8planation of the device cannot e8plain the phenomenal output reported in the news reports of )tubblefield's demonstrations. (urthermore& though the )tubblefield power receiver is wound li-e an induction coil& it produces a steady direct current output. This poses additional problems for the conventional engineer. +lectrical induction only occurs with electrical alternations& oscillations& and impulses.

,athan and Hernard )tubblefield& with wireless telephone .anuary !& !"#/ ?itnesses describe ground0powered motors which ran unceasingly and unattended for months without need for replacing or replenishing the ground battery. )mall machinery& cloc-s& and loud gongs were run by other ground0buried cells as reported by credible witnesses. )tubblefield may have discovered the auto0magnifying voltage effect of electrostatic induction in coils before Tesla& who later utili;ed the effect in his special electrostatic Transformers.

<s this the first induction pulse motor=

These buried coils may have become saturated with earth electrostatic energy& which travelled from subterranean depths. <n such a case& the mere battery power of the coil was replaced by the electrostatic flow& the coil acting as an electrode. This seems obvious when considering the fact that its ordinary battery current 9! watt: was gradually replaced by continually growing electrical current of far greater proportion.

"bse13ations made at %ittsb51gh7 %a(7 comm5nicated b6 E(W( ULGAN7 !eleg1aph manage1( D51ing A5g( )<th the intensit6 o0 the c511ent e3ol3ed 01om it 3a1ied 3e16 m5ch7 being at times no st1onge1 than an o1dina16 batte167 and then s5ddenl6 changing the poles o0 the magnets it 4o5ld s4eep th1o5gh them7 cha1ging them to thei1 5tmost capacit67 and compelling a cessation o0 4o1: 4hile it contin5ed( "n the mo1ning o0 Sept( )d7 at m6 1e=5est the %hiladelphia ope1ato1 detached his batte167 mine being al1ead6 o00( We then 4o1:ed 4ith each othe1 at inte13als as long as the a51o1al c511ent contin5ed7 4hich 3a1ied 01om thi1t6 to ninet6 seconds( D51ing these 4o1:ing inte13als 4e e>changed messages 4ith m5ch satis0action7 and 4e 4o1:ed mo1e steadil6 4hen the batte1ies 4e1e o00 than 4hen the6 4e1e attached( "n the night o0 A5g( )<th the batte1ies 4e1e attached7 and on b1ea:ing the ci1c5it the1e 4e1e seen not onl6 spa1:s ,that do not appea1 in the no1mal condition o0 a 4o1:ing line- b5t at inte13als 1eg5la1 st1eams o0 0i1e7 4hich7 had the6 been pe1mitted to last mo1e than an instant7 4o5ld ce1tainl6 ha3e 05sed the platin5m points o0 the :e67 and the helices became so hot that the hand co5ld not be :ept on them( !hese e00ects co5ld not ha3e p1od5ced b6 the batte1ies(? In '<@87 the Ame1ican Ale>ande1 G1aham Bell s5cceeded in de3eloping a p1actical telephone( !he 0i1st telephones 05nctioned so that a telephone 1ecei3e1 4as installed at both ends o0 a 4i1e( !he ea1th 05nctioned as the 1et51n 4i1e( Batte1ies 4e1e not necessa16 beca5se the telephone 1ecei3e1's pe1manent magnet p1od5ced an elect1ical c511ent in the coil 4hen a magneticall6 cond5cti3e memb1ane 4as acti3ated b6 speech( Finland's 0i1st telephone connection 4as b5ilt d51ing Decembe1 o0 '<@@ in #elsin:i(

!his is m6 test a5dio page 0o1 S6nthma:e1 !his %1ocess is 0o1 spea:e1s onl6

<'m putting up these e8amples of the *ono to )tereo converter with spatial processing

This is an e8ample of a spatial 1ueue& an instrument being thrown from one spea-er.

The correct phase for transmission typical stereo signal.

2n e8ample of the spatial being mi8ed in. This is a 45 record

2n e8ample of the original recording of the Mlovers& That Dld Hlac- *agic& first part *ono& second fade in with )patial *ono to )tereo mi8ed with spatial. www.johnbedini.net/john34/test.html/clovers.mp3 2s this is not the best conversion as it was done at 5$ bs the processor did the best it could do. Mhanging the bit rate to !/% bs with a good recording this is what you get. The first part is the *D,D recording& )econd ta-e is the 3F *D,D recording. www.johnbedini.net/john34/five0-.mp3 2s this was my first test with the components in )ynthma-er < -new that < had to ma-e the modules respond more li-e analog. < started to wor- figuring out the math functions& since H.2.).+. is a full analog process. < was able to do the whole thing using made up modules with the simple math functions. < search and

found -nobs that would wor- just fine. )ynthma-er wor-s just li-e a champ for the old mono recordings. >ere is a picture of what < have come up with. Graphics not finished yet...

>ere is the recording in 3F *ono spatial. www.johnbedini.net/john34/someone.mp3 >ere is the LJ )cope of the recording 4)T.

*oving on& it is now possible to recreate all the functions of an analog processor in )nythma-er just by using the math functions.Ta-ing the math functions and loo-ing at them as normal gain amplifiers instead of the symbols they are used for. +ach one of these functions can be modeled to build D302mps with fi8ed gain. Helow is the LJ plot of all the amplifiers combined to form a H2)+ unit.

,ow 7et's test the processor.

)pea-ers Dnly
www.johnbedini.net/john34/won!.mp3 ,ow that we have managed to ma-e analog amplifiers with )ynthma-er the real test is can it perform as an interferometer as H.2.).+. does. The modeling of the components in analog is very time consuming as each function must wor- as if it were a D302*3. The test is to move things in space& to the right& to the left& wal- bac-wards & wal- forward& and all this must be done without the loss of space in the spea-ers& it's not a pan control . The modeling is something much different then the normal circuits in )ynthma-er and must be figured out -nowing what

the symbols actually means and what they do to the bit stream. ?hat < have found is that& if the bit stream is in the subtract mode it may invert the signal and flip channels !%# degrees and must be corrected before it enters the spatial mi8er& it may loonormal but it is not. The test recording is not using any digital delay or echo with components in )ynthma-er& it is the real effect of analog modeling with spatial amplifiers& Felta T and Felta < . Test Helow. www.johnbedini.net/john34/inter.mp3 )o now& that we have gone this far& < wish to e8plain the components that < used in )ynthma-er. < have only used three math functions to build this Hase unit& < did not write any code to do any of these effects. < have loo-ed at the math function as operating amplifiers with floating points. Hy using the three functions < can build any operating D302mp& once built < use the controls just as levels to control the functions of the processor. < have posted the unit below& after that <'m going to have some fun. < have found a recording that uses a eyboard )ynth& with this test you will see the difference in what the analog H2)+ processor can do. < do move some of the controls during the recording. The unit is now balanced for the proper gains and is the final machine.

Jou can here the test below. www.johnbedini.net/john34/intermi8.mp3 *ore later as < test more recordings.

&ADIAN! ELE !&I I!D

Tesla

+verything Tesla said wor-s too with low voltage batteries& providing the switching is correct.
Through successive e8perimental arrangements& Tesla discovered several facts concerning the production of his effect. (irst& the cause was undoubtedly found in the abruptness of charging. <t was in the switch closure& the very instant of 'closure and

brea-'& which thrust the effect out into space. The effect was definitely related to time& <*3Q7)+ time. )econd& Tesla found that it was imperative that the charging process occurred in a single impulse. ,o reversal of current was permissible& else the effect would not manifest. <n this& Tesla made succinct remar-s describing the role of capacity in the spar-0radiative circuit. >e found that the effect was powerfully strengthened by placing a capacitor between the disrupter and the dynamo. ?hile providing a tremendous power to the effect& the dielectric of the capacitor also served to protect the dynamo windings. ,ot yet sure of the process at wor- in this phenomenon& Tesla sought the empirical understanding re1uired for its amplification and utili;ation. >e had already reali;ed the significance of this une8pected effect. The idea of bringing this strange and wondrous new phenomenon to its full potential already suggested drilling new possibilities in his mind. >e completely

abandoned research and development of alternating current systems after this event intimating that a new technology was about to unfold.

'?+ do not need to do this with high voltage as it wor-s on any level.'
The effect could also be greatly intensified to new and more powerful levels by raising the voltage& 1uic-ening the switch 'ma-e0brea-' rate& and shortening the actual time of switch closure. Thus far& Tesla employed rotating contact switches to produce his unidirectional impulses. ?hen these mechanical impulse systems failed to achieve the greatest possible effects& Tesla sought a more 'automatic' and powerful means. >e found this 'automatic switch' in special electrical arc dischargers. The high voltage output of a FM generator was applied to twin conductors through his new arc mechanism& a very powerful permanent magnet sitting crosswise to the discharge path. The discharge arc was automatically and continually 'blown out' by this magnetic field. <mperative toward obtaining the desired rare effect& the capacitor and its connected wire lines had to be so chosen as to receive and discharge the ac1uired electrostatic charge in unidirectional staccato fashion. The true Tesla circuit very much resembles a pulse jet& where no bac- pressure ever stops the onrushing flow. +lectrostatic charge rises to a ma8imum& and is discharged much more 1uic-ly. The constant application of high voltage dynamo pressure to the circuit insures that continual successions of 'charge0rapid discharge' are obtained. <t is then and only then that the Tesla +ffect is observed. 3ulses literally flow through the apparatus from the dynamo. The capacitor& disrupter& and its attached wire lines& behave as the flutter valve. 9 The dynamo

or the storage battery does the same thing with the correct switching:

Tesla found that impulse duration alone defined the effect of each succinct spectrum. These effects were completely distinctive& endowed with strange additional 1ualities never purely e8perienced in ,ature. *oreover& Tesla observed distinct color changes in the discharge space when each impulse range had been reached or crossed. ,ever before seen discharge colorations did not remain a mystery for long. Trains of impulses& each e8ceeding #.! millisecond duration& produced pain and mechanical pressures. <n this radiant field& objects visibly vibrated and even moved as the force field drove them along. Thin wires& e8posed to sudden bursts of the radiant field& e8ploded into vapor. 3ain and physical movements ceased when impulses of !## microseconds or less were produced. These latter features suggested weapon systems of frightful potentials. ?ith impulses of !.# microsecond duration& strong physiological heat was sensed. (urther decreases in impulse brought spontaneous illuminations capable of filling rooms and vacuum globes with white light. 2t these impulse fre1uencies& Tesla was able to stimulate the appearance of effects which are normally admi8ed among the electromagnetic energies inherent in sunlight. )horter impulses produced cool room penetrating bree;es& with an accompanying uplift in mood and awareness. There were no limits in this progression toward impulses of diminished duration. ,one of these impulse energies could be duplicated through the use of high fre1uency harmonic alternations& those which )ir Dliver 7odge populari;ed& and which later was embodied in *arconi ?ave Iadio. (ew could reproduce these effects because so few understood the absolute necessity of observing those parameters set by Tesla.

" "his unidirectional succession of charge-discharge impulses causes a very strange field to e pand outward,"

Tesla's Fiscovery and 2pplication of Iadiant +nergy

Df all the great inventions and discoveries of ,i-ola Tesla& nothing stood out with greater potential benefit to the whole of humanity than his discovery of &adiant Ene1g6 in !%%". The series of observations that led to the discovery of Iadiant energy initially grew out of e8periments that Tesla had conducted in an attempt to duplicate the results that >einrich >ert; had claimed to achieve in affirming the e8istence of electromagnetic waves& the discovery of which >ert; announced in !%%6. ?hile

replicating >ert;'s e8periments& Tesla e8perimented with violently abrupt FM electrical discharges and discovered a new force in the process. Dnly after conducting e8haustive e8perimental trials for the ne8t three years& did Tesla announce this stupendous discovery in a paper published in Fecember& !%"/& entitled 'The Fissipation of +lectricity'. <ncredibly& most academicians of the day completely missed the mar- in understanding the true significance of his paper. ,oted scientists such as )ir Dliver 7odge& mista-enly thought that Tesla was referring to high fre1uency 2M electricity in the operation of the Tesla Transformer& a huge blunder that remains to this day in the misnaming and misinterpretation of the Tesla Moil. The transformer that Tesla referred to in the !%"/ paper did not operate on magnetic/electric field induction created by alternating currents. <t operated in an entirely new domain of physics based on abrupt discharges of electrostatic potentials and the subse1uent release of -inetic Iadiant +nergy from the omnipresent ether. Tesla was now operating under entirely new rules which he referred to as 'dynamic' electro0static forces and had& by now& completely abandoned any further interest in the 2M waveform. The genesis of the 7odge misunderstanding& however& began a few years earlier with the publication of certain mathematical formulas by a brilliant )cotsman named .ames Mler- *a8well.

>ert; ?aves
>ert; used the damped oscillating currents in a dipole antenna& triggered by a high0 voltage electrical capacitive spar- discharge& as his source of radio waves. >is detector in some e8periments was another dipole antenna connected to a narrow spargap. 2 small spar- in this gap signified detection of the radio wave. ?hen he added cylindrical reflectors behind his dipole antennas& >ert; could detect radio waves about /# metres from the transmitter in his laboratory. >e did not try to transmit further because he wanted to prove electromagnetic theory& not to develop wireless communications. >ert; was uninterested in the practical importance of his e8periments. >e stated that '2t!s of no use whatsoever ... this is 3ust an e periment that proves Maestro Ma well was right - we 3ust have these mysterious electromagnetic waves that we cannot see with the na$ed eye. 4ut they are there.'Z3[ 2s-ed about the ramifications of his discoveries& >ert; replied& '5othing, 2 guess.' >ert; also stated& '< do not thin- that the wireless waves < have discovered will have any practical application.' The art of radio was left to other to implement into a practical useful form. >is discoveries would later be ta-en up by entrepreneurs loo-ing to ma-e their fortunes. *arconi's !%"5 e8periments followed >ert;'s wor- 9among others: by using a spar- source in what became -nown as a spar-0gap transmitter.

*a8well's +1uations

Qsing mathematical models& .ames Mler- *a8well had earlier suggested that two different types of electrical disturbances could possibly e8ist in ,ature. Dne type was a longit5dinal elect1ic 4a3e which re1uired alternating concentrations of densified and rarefied pulsations of electrostatic fields that moved along a single vector 9today& we refer to these as standing waves or scalar waves:. *a8well ultimately rejected this idea because he was convinced that this type of wave propagation was impossible to achieve& but his assumption was erroneous and would later portend formidable conse1uences for Tesla and the world at large. *a8well's second wave postulation was that of a t1ans3e1se elect1omagnetic 4a3e that e8hibited a rapid alternation of electric fields along a fi8ed a8is that radiated away from its point of origin at the speed of light and was detectable at great distances. *a8well had more faith in the e8istence of this type of wave and encouraged e8perimenters to loo- in this direction. <t was the discovery of this type of wave that >ert; had laid claim to& but Tesla was meticulous and fastidious in replicating >ert;'s e8perimental parameters and he could not obtain the results claimed by >ert;. Tesla discovered a fundamental flaw in >ert;'s e8perimentA >ert; had failed to ta-e into account he presence of air in his e8periments. >ert; had mista-enly identified electrostatic inductions or electrified shoc-waves as true electromagnetic waves. Tesla was saddened to bring this news to the distinguished academician& but felt scientific honesty was paramount if progress was to be achieved. Tesla visited >ert; in Germany and personally demonstrated the e8perimental error to him. >ert; agreed with Tesla and had planned to withdraw his claim& but reputations& political agendas& national pride& and above all& powerful financial interests& intervened in that decision and set the stage for a major rift in the 'accepted' theories that soon became transformed into the fundamental 'laws' of the electric sciences that have held sway in industry and the halls of academia to the present day.

The blue spi-e phenomena

Tesla's introduction to the phenomena of Iadiant +nergy began with early observations by linesmen wor-ing for Thomas +dison& Tesla's former employer
Hefore Tesla's invention of the 3olyphase 2M generator became the industry standard and overtoo- Thomas +dison's use of FM generators& the FM electrical system was the only system available to deliver electricity to 2merica's homes and factories. Fue to the resistance offered by long transmission lines& +dison had to produce very high FM voltages from his generators in order to deliver enough voltage and current to its final destination. >e also had to provide additional 'pumping' stations along the way to boost the sagging voltage which dwindled from line losses. 2 curious anomaly occurred in the very first instant of throwing the power switch at the generating

stationA <n 3urple/blue colored spi-es radiated in all directions along the a8is of the power lines for just a moment.addition& a stinging& ray0li-e shoc-ing sensation was felt by those who stood near the transmission lines. <n some cases& when very large FM voltages surged from the generators& the 'stinging' sensation was so great that occasionally a blue spi-e jumped from the line and grounded itself through a wor-man& -illing him in the process. Tesla reali;ed almost immediately that electrons were not responsible for such a phenomena because The blue spi-e phenomena ceased as soon as the current stated flowing in the lines. )omething else was happening just before the electrons had a chance to move along the wire. 2t the time& no one seemed to be very interested in discovering why these dramatic elevations in static electrical potential were ta-ing place& but rather& engineering design efforts were focused on eliminating and 1uenching this strange anomaly which was considered by everyone to be a nuisance0 e8cept Tesla. Tesla viewed it as a powerful& yet un-nown form of energy which needed to be understood and harnessed if possible. The phenomena only e8hibited itself in the first moment of switch closure& before the electrons could begin moving. There seemed to be a 'bunching' or 'cho-ing' effect at play& but only briefly. Dnce the electrons began their movement within the wire& all would return to normal. ?hat was this strange energy that was trying to liberate itself so forcefully at the moment of switch closure= .

!he 0ollo4ing 1ecital on !esla's 4o1: 4ith &adiant Ene1g6 is an e>ce1pt 01om the boo:7 Sec1ets o0 old Wa1 !echnolog6 b6 Ge116 Vassilatos7 pages <8B;*(
The 'fountain effects' which surrounded his station are not responsible for the ever0 growing power observed by Tesla. This was the result of an incoming aetheric supply for which his Transmitter gave low0resistance passage. The incoming aetheric flow preferred the transmitter terminal to adjacent& more resistant roc-. This gradual flow process soon evidenced itself in magnification effects& ever increasing volumes of flowing aether being measured in his system. )ome have argued that Tesla merely stored energy in the earth& e8tracting it for use later. This is a basic error& the result of imagining the Molorado )prings e8periment to be one consisting entirely of electrical effects. <t is in this light alone that we may comprehend the evident anomalous magnification of aetheric phenomena in his Molorado )prings photographs. Dnce aetheric energy had been obtained from space& it had to be conveyed to consumers. Tesla had arranged for the automatic activation of aether0rebroadcast circuits in the station. The down pouring aether was automatically shunted to side circuits through capacitors. <n these side branches& aether pulsed through dielectrics

and e8panded over the surfaces of his smaller coils. Thus stimulated to more rapid pulsation rates& they were ready for 'rebroadcast'. Heing rebroadcast away from the station through large vacuum globes& poised on elevated platforms& these were the aetheric pulsations& which would be utili;ed in home and industry. )imple and compact receivers would be established in every home and factory& set to receive aetheric current through the ground. Tests were thrilling. The distant appliances& lamps and motors responded to the powerful pulsations& as if they were physically connected to the station by wire. 2 small house0li-e structure was established some /$ miles away from the station. <n it& an aetheric power receiver was tuned to one of the rebroadcast rates. The /## lamps housed within this structure& each of 5# watts rating& all remained brilliantly illuminated throughout the test runs. This apparently stimulated enough e8citement and concern for word of this development to get baceast. +ngineers were enraged. Those who had missed his most early shift from alternations to impulses& failed to comprehend the vast distinction between 'stationary waves' and ' standing waves'. The 1ui;;ical use of specific terms such as these was a Tesla trademar-& one designed to pu;;le the minds of those who critici;ed him the most. ?ith the e8ception of a very few colleagues who continually made related discoveries in aether physics& most academes had chosen to remain totally ignorant of the new study area. This for e8ample was the case with the Teslian use of the term 'fre1uency' and of 'resonance' words which had completely different meanings for Tesla. Teslian 'fre1uency' refers to the repetition of pulses per second. Teslian 'resonance' refers to conditions in which aether flows with little or no resistance through systems& whether pro8imal or widely separated. 3hotographs& which Tesla sent to his 'financiers'& were analy;ed and ree8amined repeatedly for their encrypted meaning. ,one could decipher the cunning pu;;le which Tesla had set before them. Tesla stated that photographs of the aetheric white fire streamers re1uired several minutes' e8posure time before registering the faintest sort of impression. *ost of the plates were therefore the results of more than /# minutes' e8posure time. There are a very few plates which& though stated to be the result of 'one brief switch closure'& are covered with dense& thic- white streamers. Dne fraction of a second closure on the system switch resulted in a twenty0minute or more aether avalanche. *agnifying Transformers continued discharging long after the initial impulse had been withdrawn.

AE!#E& %"WE& &E EIVE&S

Tesla returned to ,ew Jor- e8ultant. >e was about to establish a new world precedent. 4enture capitalists were everywhere& loo-ing for their opportunity to enter the 'new energy' mar-et. Qn-nown to Tesla& his station& its tower& the large coils& the capacitors& and all the other marvelous apparatus& which demonstrated free aetheric power to the world& had been ac1uired for demolition. Tesla simply went forward& securing new funds from *organ and others toward the development of a fully

functional industry si;ed station in 7ong <sland. ?ardenclyffe )tation. ?ardenclyffe would be his greatest achievement. >ere he would broadcast power to the world& along with a communications networ-& which could span the globe with innumerable available channels. 2ether wave communications. )everal stations would augment the power of this first station& from which he proposed to rebroadcast !#&### horsepower. The )tation& a wonderful visionary structure& which dominated the view of )horeham& 7ong <sland& was not 1uite complete before it too was sei;ed by court injunctions and torn down.

Tesla was summoned to appear in court. *r. 7eland 2nderson who has since published a wonderful treatise with this transcript as the centerpiece has secured the ama;ing transcript of this proceeding. Tesla said he wept when he saw the ruined tower at ?ardenclyffe. The train ride bac- from )horeham was filled with tears and the recounting of every tragedy& which mar-ed his life. Hut the dreams did not die there. <n the absence of financial means to construct his gigantic stations& Tesla found ways to build small systems& which accomplished the very same objectives. Ieplacing the large overhead capacity terminal with material substitutes& radioactive metals in combination with other dense elements& Tesla was able to accrete and focus aether pulsations of super short duration. Tesla was then plunged into a hellish time& where all but one would neither help nor hear him. Fr. .ohn >ammond re1uested Tesla to be the permanent guest on his family estate. There& amid the family life of >ammond Mastle& Tesla shared his dreams and technology. Together& he and Fr. >ammond developed the science of robots and remote guidance. Tesla& impoverished by the inhuman treatment wrought on him by the financial establishment& was nonetheless 1uite alive and valuable to those having

singular ambition to dominate the world radio trade. (or a very long time& ,i-ola Tesla was considered 'out of circulation.' Hut later years turned a -indlier edge toward him. 7ong after his principle foe had died& other sought him out. +mployed by the Ioc-efellers in their IM2 venture& Tesla was given the tas- of restructuring the now failing *arconi )ystem. Favid )arnoff did not permit Tesla the dignity of wor-ing under his own name! ,evertheless it was Tesla& not )arnoff& who redesigned the insufficient IM2 radio systems to sufficiently turn a profit for the owners. <t is significant that Tesla was not allowed to change the basic design from wave radio to radiant communications. ?hat he achieved re1uired certain strange conversions within the wave radio circuitry& intensifying radiant signals until the operation was much improved& and then converting the amplified signals bac- to waves once again. 2ll of this was achieved within the chassis& certain of which are now being studied. These Tesla e8perimental models are typical of the Tesla style& containing no resistors or other such components. These models use simple transmitter tubes and employ a great number of symmetrically disposed conical air coils. ?hile wor-ing for IM2 under the name 'Terbo'& Tesla maintained his two penthouse suites atop the >otel ,ew Jor-er. Dne penthouse was his living 1uarters& the other a full0scale research laboratory. Tesla designed and built small compact and portable aether energy receivers& a developmental path& which he pursued to his passing. Tesla had long investigated the use of pure dielectric field energy& a stream of aether whose individual pulsations were so very ultra short that science had never found a means to harness the energy impulses. Tesla later held the opinion that dielectric current was composed of radiant particles& aetheric in nature. >e therefore sought natural sources in which native dielectric fields could be used as they were& without the need for mammoth voltage 'shoc-s' to stigmata aetheric currents. Tesla -new that if dielectric aether streams could be directly engaged& a true world of the future would be in his grasp. (urthermore& the mass0production of thousands and ten of thousands of such power receivers would be an unstoppable army. 2n army of miniatures& which could never be torn down. The implications were fathomless. Tesla had found a truly new and wonderful approach to an old problem. Dnce because his technology had not yet grown to the level where this was possible& he had to settle for impressing the naturally prolific aether streams with 'e8tra' pulsations. The Transmitter method was costly& gargantuan& and an easy target for those who hated the notion of a future world where dreams rule humanity. Fielectric energy fascinated Tesla. <t was everywhere& a natural emanation whose potentials far out proportioned conventional notions of power. <ndeed& the early conception of natural radioactivity as an energetic source was nothing in comparison to the potential power inherent in dielectric streams. The new technology would use ultra0short pulsing aether streams& energies that occupied most of his latter press conferences in latter years. )tudy had convinced Tesla that the apparently smooth and native force characteristic of dielectric field energy was

actually a particulate flu8& a succession of ultra0short impulses. The derivation of such an impulse train would solve all energy needs for eternity with an elegance far out0 reaching his own

$agni0ie1 !1ansmitte1
Df a truth& dielectric energy was native source of incredible proportion and virtually eternal duration. 2ble to use such a -inetic source& one could dispense entirely with the 3ower Transmitters necessary in stimulating and impressing 'e8tra pulsations' on the aether flow. Tesla often defined the dielectric field as a natural flow of aether particles& one that seemed impossible to utili;e through lac- of appropriate resistive materials. <n order to obtain momentum from the flowing particles of a dielectric field& one re1uired special matter poised in e1ually special symmetries. The otherwise continuous flow could be absorbed directly& being e8changed to utilities& appliances& and other applications.Tesla had already considered the condition of charged particles& each representing a tightly constricted whorl of aether. The force necessarily e8erted at close distances by such aetheric constrictions was incalculably large. 2etheric ponderance maintained particulate stability. Mrystalline lattices were therefore places within which one could e8pect to find une8pected voltages. <ndeed& the high voltages inherent in certain metallic lattices& intra0atomic field energies& are enormous. The close Moulomb gradient between atomic centers are electrostatic potentials reaching humanly unattainable levels. Hy comparison& the voltages& which Tesla once succeeded in releasing& were 1uite insignificant. <n these balanced lattices& Tesla sought the voltages needed to initiate directed aetheric streams in matter. Dnce such a flow began& one could simply tap the stream for power. <n certain materials& these aether streams might automatically produce the contaminating electrons& a source of energy for e8isting appliances. Dne could theoretically then 'tailor' the materials needed to produce une8pected aetheric power with or without the attendant detrital particles. Tesla did mention the latent aetheric power of charge forces& the e8plosive potentials of bound aether& and the aetheric 3ower inherent in matter. <n these studies& Tesla sought replacement for the !##&###&### volt initiating pulses for the implementation of space aether.

2ether physics
2ether physics was a lost physics. 3hysics was hijac-ed early inthe /#th Mentury by alleged results of the *ichelson0*orleye8periment. The *ichelson0*orley e8periment assumed 'aether' was matter. There is some confusion here. ?e -now now that particles moving near the speed of light are measured as waves&that is energy& rather than as matter. ,evertheless& aether theory has been discredited among physicists who& in turn&discredit others who raise the subject. <t is only through the efforts of 'free energy devices' and free energy researchers that this -nowledge is being returned to us. ?ithout this aether theory& the reason these devices wor- cannot be e8plained at all. Iejection of aether theory allows these devices to be dismissed as'theoretically impossible' and so fraudulent by simple deduction.They are marginali;ed and dismissed as 'perpetual motiondevices'. 2ccording to established physics& perpetual motion devices violate physical laws of conservation of energy. ?ithout an aether theory as an e8planation& they do violate laws of conservation of energy and so their detractors are able to simply dismiss them out of hand. The simple fact that some of these free energy devices actually wor- does not seem to bother these scientists in the least. Iather than change the theory to accommodate the observed facts& the facts are ignored and substituted by dogma. ?haether we li-e it or not& we are living in an energy Far- 2ge.

<nstead of aether theory& we have all been led to focus upon +instein and his Theories of Ielativity. Two or three generations of scientists have wasted themselves on 'trying to prove +instein right'. This misguided thin-ing has resulted instagnation. Dne need go no further than the many 'free energy' devices which have arisen to the level of notice in spite of accepted scientific theory to see that this statement is true.

!esla's &ecent %atents

',i-ola Tesla has received several patents for a '*ethod of <ntensifying and Qtili;ing +ffects Transmitted Through ,atural *edia.' <n one of these systems Tesla varies the potential point or region of the earth by imparting to it intermittent or alternating electrifications through one of the terminals of a suitable source of electrical disturbances which to heighten the effect& has its other terminal connected with an insulated body& preferably of large surface and at an elevation. +lectrifications communicated to the earth spread in all directions& reaching a circuit which generally has its terminals arranged and connected similarly to those of the transmitting source and which operates upon a highly sensitive receiver. 2nother of Telsa's methods is based upon the fact that the atmospheric air& which behaves as an e8cellent insulator to currents generated by ordinary apparatus& becomes a conductor under the influence of currents or impulses of enormously high electromotive force. Hy such means air strata& which are easily accessible& are rendered available for the production of many desired effects at distances. 2lthough either method may be employed& it is obviously desirable that the disturbance should be as powerful as possible and should be transmitted with a minimal loss. The loss reduces greatly both the intensity and the number of the co0operative impulses& and since the initial intensity of each of these is necessarily limited& only an insignificant amount of energy is thus available for a single operation of the receiver. (urthermore the energy obtained through the cooperation of the impulses is in the form of an e8tremely rapid vibration and unsuitable for the operation of ordinary receivers. To overcome the limitations of the two methods mentioned& Tesla reproduces arbitrarily varied or intermittent disturbances or effectsN transmits these disturbances through the air to a distant receiving station& utili;es the energy derived from such disturbances at the receiving station to charge a condenser& and uses the accumulated potential so obtained to operate a receiving device. The apparatus which is employed at the receiving station consists in the combination of a storage device included in a circuit& connection points at a distance from the source of the disturbances and between which a difference of potential is created by such disturbances& a receiving circuit connected with the storage device& a receiver included in the receiving circuit& and a mechanism for closing the receiving circuit at

any desired moment& thereby causing the receiver to be operated by the energy with which the storage device has been charged. <n another method the energy stored is not& as in the previous instance& obtained from the energy of the disturbance effect transmitted from a distance& but from an independent source. The method in general consists in charging a storage device with energy from an independent source& controlling the charge of the device by the action of the effects or disturbances transmitted through the natural media and coincidently using the stored energy for operating a receiver. 2 condenser is used as the storage means. The invisible radiations of the spectrum and of vacuum tubes are generally considered to be vibrations of e8tremely small wave length. These radiations posses the property of charging and discharging conductors of electricity& the discharge being particularly noticeable when the conductor upon which the rays impinge is negatively electrified. <t is usually held that these radiations ioni;e or render conducting the atmosphere through which they are propagated. Tesla's own e8periments lead him& however& to conclusions more in accord with the theory he has already advanced& in which he holds that sources of such radiant energy throw off with great velocities minute particles of matter which are strongly electrified& and therefore capable of charging an electrical conductor& or even if not so& of discharging an electrified conductor either by carrying off bodily its charge or otherwise. Tesla has ta-en out a patent based on a discovery which he has made& that when rays or radiations of this -ind are permitted to fall upon an insulated conducting body connected with one of the terminals of a condenser while the other terminal is made by independent means to receive or carry away electricity& a current flows into the condenser as long as the insulated body is e8posed to the rays. Qnder certain conditions an indefinite accumulation of electrical energy ta-es place. This energy after a suitable time interval during which the rays are allowed to act& may manifest itself in a powerful discharge& which can be utili;ed for the operation or control of mechanical or electrical devices or rendered useful in many other ways. The radiant energy is directed upon an elevated conductor& connected with one of the armatures of the condenser& positively electrified by the invisible radiations. The electricity is carried off from the other armature by connecting it with the ground. The accumulated energy is discharged through a suitable receiver.'

)32M+ (7D?<,G MQII+,T

4ery reputable e8perimenters besides Tesla continued claiming that 'space flowing electricity' is the real electricity. Tesla's classic demonstrations proved that rapid electrical impulses actually e8ceed the ability of fi8ed charges to transmit the applied forces. Mharges lag where electrostatic forces continue propagating. Dne is compelled to see that electrostatic forces precede the movement of charges. Tesla saw that electrostatic impulses could flow without line charges. >is ';ero current coils' operated simply because the charges themselves were immobili;ed. +lectricity was shown to be more in the nature of a flowing force rather than a stream of massive particles. Hut what then was this 'flowing current'= <n Tesla's view& radiant electricity is a space flowing current& which is ,DT made of electrons. 7ater 4ictorians believed that there was a substance& which both filled all space and permeated all matter. )everal serious researchers claimed to have identified this gas. ,otables& such as *endeleev predicted the e8istence of several ultra0rare gases& which preceded hydrogen. These& he claimed& were inert gases. This is why they were rarely detected. The inert gases& which *endeleev predicted& formed an atmosphere& which flooded all of space. These gaseous mi8tures composed the 2ether. Tesla and others believed that both electrical and magnetic forces were actually streams of 2ether gas& which had been fi8ated in matter. *aterials were somehow 'polari;ed' by various 'frictive' treatments by which an 2ether gas flow was induced in them. *ost materials could maintain the flow indefinitely& since no wor- was re1uired on their part. *atter had only to remain polari;ed& transducing the 2ether flow. The 2ether gas contained all the power. Qnlimited power. This 2ether gas power manifested as the electromagnetic forces themselves& ade1uate reason to pursue the development of an 2ether gas engine. )uch an engine could run

forever on the eternal -inetic energies of the 2ether itself& it being both generated and driven by the stars. Tesla believed that radiant electricity is composed of 2ether gas. >e based this belief on the fact that his ;ero current coils were not conducting the 'slow and dense' charges usually observed in ordinary electrical circuits. 2brupt impulses produced distinctive and different effects ... fluidic effects. The 1ualities ascribed by Tesla to 'electricity' or things 'electrical' in his numerous patent te8ts and press interviews are those& which refer to the 2ether gas. Tesla did not refer to electron currents as 'electricity'. >e did not e1uate 'electricity' with electron flow. ?henever Tesla spo-e of 'electrical' effects he always described their effusive& gaseous 1uality. Tesla referred to space as the 'ambient or natural medium'. )pace& he claimed& was that which 'conducts electricity'. >e had found a means by which this gaseous electrical flow could be greatly concentrated& magnified& and directed. >e saw that this radiant electricity was& in reality& a gaseous emanation. 2n 2etheric emanation. This is why he made constant reference to fluidic terminology throughout his lectures. Iesistance& volume& capacity& reservoir& surface area& tension& pressure& pressure releaseA these were the terms upon which Tesla relied throughout his presentations. The terminology of hydraulics. Tesla also recogni;ed that because 2ether was a gas& it had aerodynamic re1uirements. 2ether& in Tesla's le8icon& was space flowing electricityA a gas of superlative and transcendent 1ualities. 2ether was the electricity& which filled all of space& a vast reservoir of unsurpassable power. *otive& dynamic& and free for the ta-ing. 2ether gas technology would revolutioni;e the world. 2ether gas engines would provide an eternal power source for the world. )cience& industry& corporations& financial alignments& social orders& nations ... everything would change.

Tesla's )tanding ?aves

4efore the turn of the century, 5i$ola "esla had discovered and was utili&ing a new type of electric wave. "esla repeatedly stated his waves were non-6ert&ian, and his wireless transmissions did not fall off as the s7uare of the distance. 6is discovery was apparently so fundamental (and his intent to provide free energy to all human$ind was so clear) that it was responsible for the withdrawal of his financial bac$ing, his deliberate isolation, and the gradual removal of his name from the

history boo$s. 4y ,8,9 or so, "esla had been successfully isolated and was already nearly a "nonperson." "hereafter "esla lived in nearly total seclusion, occasionally surfacing (at his annual birthday party for members of the press) to announce the discovery of an enormous new source of free energy, the perfection of wireless transmission of energy without losses, fireball weapons to destroy whole armies and thousands of airplanes at hundreds of miles distance, and a weapon (the ""esla +hield," 2!ve dubbed it ) that could provide an impenetrable defense and thus render war obsolete. 2n my pursuit of "esla!s secret, it gradually became apparent to me that present orthodo electromagnetic theory is seriously flawed in some fundamental respects. :ne of these is in the definition and use of f, the scalar electrostatic potential. 2t is this error which has hidden the long-sought unified field theory from the theorists. 2n the theory of the scalar electrostatic potential (+'P), the idea is introduced of wor$ accomplished on a charge brought in from a distance against the scalar field. "he +'P is not a vector field, but is a scalar field. 2ndeed, scalar potential cannot of itself perform wor$ on a charged mass; if it could do so, then tremendous force would e ist on every mass due to the e tremely high +'P of the vacuum itself. :nly a differential of +'P between two spatial points can produce force or accomplish wor$. (0igorously, a differential of scalar potential between two spatial points constitutes a vector. :nly a vector can produce force and do wor$.) #lso, wor$ can only be done on a mass. <urther, it ta$es time= to move an electron or other charged mass between two spatial points, and so the wor$ performed by a spatial differential of the f-field re7uires time. 0igorously, the delta +'P is voltage, not +'P per se, and is directly related to ' field. "he entire voltage concept depends on the wor$ performed in moving a mass, after that mass has moved. "he idea of "voltage" always implies the e istence of a steady differential of f between two spatial points for a finite length of time, and it also involves the assumption of a flow of actual mass having occurred. +'P, on the one hand, is always a single-point function; on the other hand, difference in potential (i.e., () is always a two point function, as is any vector. >et many graduate level physics and electromagnetics papers and te ts erroneously confuse f and ( in the static case? +uch an interpretation is of course 7uite incorrect.

@ "wo spatial points involve at least @t A @BCc in time. #ll vectors and gradients involve D separated spatial points, and thus present timelines in 9-space. f9 is a point, not a line, in 9-space.

#nother common assumption in present 'M theory -- that the electrostatic potential (f.) of the normal vacuum is &ero -- has no legitimate basis. 2n fact, we $now f. is non&ero because the vacuum is filled with enormous amounts of fluctuating virtual state activity, including incredible charge fluctuations. #nd by virtue of its point definition, f. must be the "instantaneous intensity" of these fluctuations -- but both in space and time. "he scalar electrostatic potential is therefore the "instantaneous stress" on spacetime itself, and a measure of the intensity of the virtual state flu through a 9-dimensional spacetime point. Potential theory was largely developed in the ,-..!s, before the theory of relativity. "ime flowrate was then regarded as immutable. #ccordingly, electrostatic "intensity" was chosen as "spatial intensity," with the connotation of "spatial flu density." "his assumes a constant, immutable rate of flow of time, which need not be true at all if we believe relativity. +uch a spatial "point" intensity is actually a "line" in 9-space, and not a 9-dimensional "point" at all. "hus the spatial potential -- f/ -- is a very special case of the real spacetime potential -- f9, or charge and electromagnetic theory today is accordingly a special case of the real 9-space electromagnetism that actually e ists? 5ote also that charge is a 9-dimensional concept. 5ow mass is a spatial, /-dimensional concept. 0igorously, mass does not e ist in time -- masstime e ists in time. Mass and charge are thus of differing dimensionalities? #lso, according to 7uantum mechanics, the charge of a particle -- e.g., of an electron -- is due to the continual flu of virtual particles given off and absorbed by the observable particle of mass. "hus charge also is conceptually a measure of the virtual flu density, and directly related to f. <urther, since the charge e ists in time, it is the charge of a particle of spatial mass that gives it the property of masstime, or e isting in time. 6ere a great confusion and fundamental error has been thrown into the present 'M theory by the e7uating of "charge" and "charged mass." #s we have seen, the two things are really very different indeed. "o spea$ of a spatial "amount" of charge erroneously limits the basic 'M theory to a fi ed time flowrate condition (which of course it was considered to be, prior to 'instein!s development of relativity). "hus when the limited present theory encounters a "relativistic" case (where the time flowrate changes), all sorts of e traordinary corrections must be introduced. "he real problem, of course, is with the fundamental definitions of electrostatic potential and charge. "he spatial "amount" of charge (i.e. the coulomb) as we presently erroneously use the term, is

actually the spatial amount of observable "charged mass." "o correct the theory, one must introduce the true 9-space +'P and separate the definitions of charge and charged mass. :nly when a mass is moved does one have wor$ -- and voltage or vector fields. ("he reason one has voltage and ' field connected to a normal electrostatically charged ob3ect in the laboratory is because an e cess of chargedparticle masses are assembled on the ob3ect, and these masses are in violent motion? # true static charge would have no ' field at all. )

St15ct51e o0 the Schappelle1 De3ice

(irst developed in Germany. 2fter the )econd ?orld ?ar two different sciences developed called '3hysics'. Dne was the relativism taught in schools. The second more esoteric type wasutili;ed only secretly& by the secret government& for deep blac-projects. 2ccording to Favson's description upon which we will rely& the )chappeller device is really composed of two separate units& the rotor and the stator. The stator is constructed as followsA <ts surface is round or ball0shaped& being composed of two half0shells of steel. These half0shells contain the internal structure and are air tight. 2ttached at each 'pole' of each half0shell is an iron bar magnet& most of whose structure is internal. This means that the bul- of the magnet is inside the steel ball& one opposite the other. There is a space between thetwo bar magnets at the very center of the sphere. <nsulation& a ceramic material& is placed on the inside of the steel ball leaving a hollow central area. ?ithin this hollow area and around the space between the magnets are wound two internal coils. These originate at the bar magnet poles and each terminates at the center of the sphere with a connection leading out of the sphere to the rotor.

These coils are composed of a hollow copper tube filled with a special and secret substancecalled the 'electret'. Qpon leaving the sphere the electret filled copper tubes are replaced by conventional copper wire. 2n electrical connection is made from the outside surface of one pole to one pole of a special type of battery which is grounded at the other pole or& as an alternative& to a special device called an 'Qr0machine' which will be discussed. This electret is a permanent magnet within the sphere. This type of magnetism is not identical with ferro0magnetism or electromagnetism& it is much stronger . The actual composition of )chappeller's electret remains a secret but another electret has been made by 3rofessor *ototaro +guchi. <t consists of carnauba wa8 and resin& perhaps also containing some beeswa8. <t was -ept in a strong electric field while ba-ing slowly until it solidified. (or purposes of production of )chappeller spheres& a complete electret manufacturing plant would have to be set up which had no parallel in present science . Hefore being set into operation& all the air is pumped from the hollow core of the sphere. This whole ball is mounted on aswivel mechanism so that the poles can be moved from the vertical to the hori;ontal. The stator is completely unattached from the rotor. The stator can function without the rotor and the stator is capable of producing electrical energy without the rotor. The rotor could also be used to generate additional electrical energy.

The rotor consists ofA 2 steel wheel of special design fi8ed on

(or an understanding of what is really happening here we have to consider the bar magnet. ?e thin- of a bar of iron with two poles& one positive and one negative or perhaps one north and one south pole. Hut there are really three components to the bar magnet. There are the two poles and the neutral ;one between the poles <f we cut the magnet in half we get two new poles. (or the )chappeller this neutral area is very important. <magine a barmagnet running through the vertical a8is of the ball. Then imagine the center section cut out. ?e now have a north pole at the top of the ball& a south pole at the bottom of the ball just as we do with the planet +arth. <n the center we have a missing section with a south pole& opposing the north pole at the top ofthe ball and& li-ewise& a north pole opposite the south pole at the bottom of the ball. ?e have now four poles and a split barmagnet with a gap in its center section. <t is this gap in the center where )chappeller's 'glowing magnetism' is generated by grounding& that is& charging the device via a special battery and an earth connection. This glowing magnetism is the mystery. Favson cites )chappeller's calculations and gives this form of magnetism as being one thousand times more powerful than that produced by present magnetism . >e also states that in this form of magnetism the electricity is stationary while the magnetism is radiated .

To repeat again& Favson contends throughout his boo- that this glowing magnetism is not found in secondary physics& that is& in modern physics& and that this glowing magnetism is a manifestation of primary physics. 2s a phenomenon of primary physics& it is responsible for and can generate heat& electricity and magnetism. 2fter initial stimulation and in a state of glowing magnetism& no further input of energy is needed from the battery. The deviceis able to draw in energy to it directly from the surrounding aether& bind this energy though its magnetic electret material& that is the filling in the hollow copper coils of the internal coil& and then re0radiate energy producing heat& electricity&magnetism or mechanical wor- depending upon the application. )tated another way& this is an implosion device and it is described as such . Qnli-e the )chauberger device which is associated with the word implosion& the )chappeller device operates purely at the energetic level. +nergy is drawn towards the center& through the magnets& into the field of glowing magnetism& and then radiated outward. The first e8planation for this output of radiant energy involves the concept of the Hloch ?all. 2 Hloch ?all is defined by 4an ,orstrand's )cientific +ncyclopedia& !"5% edition& pages /#! and /#/& as followsA 'This is a transition layer between adjacent ferromagnetic domains magneti;ed in different directions. The wall has a finite thic-ness of a few hundred lattice constants& as it isenergetically preferable for the spin directions to change slowly from one orientation to another& going through the wall rather than to have an abrupt discontinuity'. <n electromagnetics the Hloch ?all is e8ternal to the hardware itself. <t is the point of division of the circling vorte8& or spin& of the electronic magnetic energies of the north and south poles. The negative north pole magnetism spins to the left while the positive south pole spins to the right. +nergy is being conducted into the )chappeller device through the un0insulated poles and being conducted and spun on its way to the center of the unit. The point of ;ero magnetism& no spin and magnetic reversal& where the two spin fields join& is the Hloch ?all . *ost of us have heard of the two Thermodynamic 7aws. These are laws of heat. The (irst 7aw of Thermodynamics states that energy is conserved& meaning that the total amount of energy in the universe always remains the same. This is no surprise for most of us and it is not the real concern here. ?hat is of concern is the )econd 7aw of Thermodynamics which discusses heat and entropy. The word entropy might be thought of as a state of randomness or chaos. ,egative entropy would then mean movement toward the less random or the more ordered in any particular thing. <f we apply this to a system& then entropy tends to increase until the system brea-s down in utter chaos This will occur unless the system is re0charged with additional outside energy. 2 concrete e8ample is less confusing.

<magine a new automobile just coming off the assembly line. <t has ta-en a great deal of energy to find& refine& forge& weld&and paint the metal parts of this car alone. This same concept also applies to all the other components of the car. This energy and organi;ation constitute a highly organi;ed state& or& said another way& a state of negative entropy. ?hat happens ne8t illustrates entropy. The car is purchased. ?haether it is driven hard or just sits in the garage does not matter in the long run because what happens to the car is that it starts to fall apart. This change may be small at first and may only occur at the molecular level& but it occurs nevertheless.The engine& transmission& paint& rubber& electronics& etc. all will fail with time. +ven it the car just sits in the garage& in a thousand years the metal will eventually o8idi;e. (inally& the car rusts away forming a reddish brown heap. This is e8actly the opposite of the organi;ation and energy used to put the car togaether. This disorgani;ation is entropy. The only thing which will reverse this& as we all -now& are additional inputs of energy by the owner in the form of maintenance and repairs. 2ll things in a relative state of relative order move toward a state of disorder. <n terms of heat& heat will always flow into a colder place from a warmer place. ?hen something is heated there is a rise in its entropy. ?ith increasing heat its molecules move faster and faster in random chaos as a bomb does when it e8plodes. <ncreasing heat means increasing randomness and chaos which is entropy. Mold& then& can be seen in terms of negative entropy. 2ny cold object is simply more organi;ed and less random than the same object once it is heated. )chappeller had something to say about the )econd 7aw of Thermodynamics. >e said there was another and un-nown thermodynamic cycle which runs opposite the )econd 7aw. ?e will call it 'Ieverse Thermodynamics'. <t is the reverse of the )econd 7aw of Thermodynamics in that it leads to an increase in entropy. ,ot only is there an increase in order but there is an increase in cold! )chappeller& according to *r. ?atson's letter& built his spherical device primarily to demonstrate the principles behind this Ieverse Thermodynamics. <t was not designed as a practical machine.

ETERNAL LANTERNS
Every symbol, artifact, and accessory of the Utopian world emanates light. Transported earthly visitors first remark at this suffusive light. Their host joyously explains that "the light comes from everywhere". This magickal radiance is the light of consciousness itself. ythologies and histories alike are replete with reports of the "endless light". The radiant beauty of mythical "eternal lanterns" stimulates and provokes timeless scientific desire. Their endless effulgence remains their single most fascinating aspect. !an such a light source exist in the material world" The mystery of that eternal radiance could neither be compared nor e#ualed on earth. $irecraft did not reproduce the #uality of Utopian ideal radiance. %uch eternal light projects joy and wonder. &either their radiance nor the vivifying thrill ever fade with time. The image and symbol of the eternal lantern permeates mythology. 'owever separated in distance or time, mythologies the world over each speak of eternal lanterns. The symbol of the eternal lamp is a haunting object, which we most desire. ( wordless message of hope and life beam forth, most directly representing divinity.

)elieving that eternal lanterns once existed in the fabled world, ancient #ualitative science sought them with a deep faith that they could be found. (ncient con#uerors made extensive search for eternal lanterns and other such "fabulous" treasures. To locate, recapture, of unearth these lamps provided a formidable con#ueror*s #uest. +ikewise, numerous radiant sources were discovered and described by credible naturalists. (s centuries passed, certain scientific artisans claimed that they had successfully reproduced eternal lanterns. (ccording to some bards of the iddle (ges, there were lands where dreams had literally materiali,ed. -ingdoms and rare wonders lay to the east, possessors of magickal technology. $ollowing this trail of legends and marvels came arco .olo. (mong the material proofs, which he brought home to /enice, there were also new legends and reports. arco .olo told of palaces and kings, kingdoms and artifacts, exotic natural wonders and anomalies. !aravans of archetypes and symbols. 0n the city of the great -han, there were hundreds of fabled rubies, thousands of gold tablets, and millions of standing soldiers. arco stated very plainly that, in the outlying provinces of the -han*s empire, radiant stones and magickal accessories were commonly employed for a great variety of purposes. 'e had seen some of these marvels with his own eyes. 1ne particular legend, which he was fond of retelling, is rarely heard or mentioned today. 0t centered about the fabulous .rester 2ohn, mythical -ing of the East. .rester 2ohn sat in a magickal throne room, a great flooding radiance shed by special rare gems. The unearthly light of his throne, an undying light. 'e employed the radiance of these rare gems to render his throne room sacred, enlightened, vivifying, and #uiescent. 'is knights were continually flooded with strength and love for their cause because of these radiant stones. Through the agency of special viewing stones, .rester 2ohn gained instant knowledge of distant events. Empowered to project peace and benevolence to distant warring lands, he watched and interceded over whole regions through these magickal means. 'e was able to project help to those lands through rays, which came from his magickal stones. $amines reversed, plagues eradicated, joy restored, .rester 2ohn was the protector of nations who did not know him. .rester 2ohn 3".astor 2ohn"4, the mystically advanced !hristian -ing, is a notable story of ongol origin. The eternal lantern, one of innumerable archetypes, persists in mythologies the world over. arco claimed he had seen black rocks used in !appadocia to produce light and heat. 0n parts of the same region, he claimed to have seen "black oils" taken from bubbling earth pits for the same purpose. %cholars rejected everything he had to say when they heard these two reports. +ong after his passing, when coal and petroleum were later discovered by Europeans, all the

words of arco .olo were heeded without #uestion. The wonder of eternal radiance, .rester 2ohn, and magickal technology continued to occupy human curiosities throughout the following centuries. (ll lands and peoples have the eternal lantern in their dream treasuries. &ordic mythology ascribed "eternal lanterns" to the gnomes, who both inherited and manufactured them. The gnomes used their mystical lanterns to light gem5studded subterranean palaces. The lanterns themselves had names, archaically crafted by famed gnome masters. ade of radiant stones, they continuously emanated soft colors and an atmosphere of great delight. The magickal lanterns themselves were fabricated from rare glowing elements and gems. 0n fables, mystical eternal lanterns are made of humanly inaccessible minerals and elements. +egends continually remind us that magickal elements and gems have archaic world5origins, remnants of the lost world. Uncorrupted by the touch and taint of mortals, they frame the evidence of a first creation. Their properties, pure and sacredly honored, emerge from the dream world. $ables teach that all beings naturally seek these materials. !ertain beings, gnomes the most fre#uent species, covet these lanterns with a rare viciousness. The "radiant stones" reveal the first world &ature and all its wonder, the "lost elements" of which the old world was made. 0n the fables, the magickal elements are said to yet exist in the deepest recesses of the earth and in special secret mountains. %piritual prowess is re#uired to both recogni,e and retrieve the minerals. The "hidden folk" always see what mortals cannot, plucking magick gems and mining magick metals from their archaic repositories with ease. 6nomes, faeries, elves, and angels jealously retain the secret of radiant stones and radiant lanterns. 7hen humans manage to obtain them, there are conse#uent complications. The magick elements and radiant stones are always wonderful to all who behold them. Their radiance is divine. ysterious beings reverence the appearance of the radiant stones. 'umanity especially cherishes and desires them. Elves cynically remind us why we have lost both the first world and the wonder elements of which it was made. The wondrous gems and metals invariably come from "forgotten archaic ages". They are "first created matter", "sacred gems", and "starry metals". They are the material of the old world. $ables report that these wonderful elements come from the times just after the beginning of creation. 'aving been buried in the angelic rebellions, some remain in the deep recesses of earth. 1thers, having been thrown among the stars, reside in the stardust, awaiting the time when they may return to bless humanity. They hold the key to human conscious progress, re#uiring only humility before they may be discovered.

ystery minerals and radiant gems are often found where natural catastrophism is at work. 8adiant stones are loosened from archaic imprisonment by strange events, which the "hidden folk" worriedly pursue. They jealously guard their treasures from "bumbling" humanity. 7onder elements are found in the dearth of volcanic explosions, flung up from mysterious metaphysical depths. %ome fall to earth from space, glowing and pulsating. 7hether thrown out of earth or space treasuries, they are usually found by adventurous humans whose lives become transformed. 7hat these persons do with their treasure usually determines their fate, a moral lesson concerning the abuse of power. There are peaceful ways in which the radiant stones are located in some tales. There are those who see magickal glowing pools of water by night. /enturing in, they manage to find the rare "wish5granting" glowing gems. %ome only appear during certain astrological seasons, under specific "heavenly signs". They are seen only by sensitives who, with greatest care, find them radiating their light when touched by the crescent moon. ysterious visitors often add a "pinch" of magick dust into the mixtures of old despondent alchemists. 7hen this alchemical projection has performed its work, the molten metals become joyfully radiant. "+ost elements" grant their bearers strange abilities and miraculous powers. The abilities they give often re#uire a small exertion of mind, with a resultant magnification of intent. 7earing the radiant gems, one can become invincible or invisible. 1ne can pass through walls. 1ne can fly, lift great weights, bring lightning or storms, and perform unheard superhuman works. These mysterious materials link dreams directly with the world. They are windows through which archetypes flow directly into our world. 7ish amplifiers. The very artifacts of .rester 2ohn. agickal technology re#uires the radiant stones. They are the lost talismans, the lost instrumentalities that guide and extend human consciousness. 8adiant stones are the reagents of every lost technology. Those who find them become heroes or villains. The legends tell both of the location and loss of mystery elements. They may be found, granted, or stolen. Each means of obtaining them has its conse#uences. agick rings are given to humble recipients by angelic visitors. ystical necklaces are given in return for humanly kind gestures to children. They are fabulous rewards from gnomes, faeries, and sprites. +ittle children and humble old folk often accidentally find magickal materials by the deliberate design of "hidden ones". 8adiant crystalline jewels are often found by humans who enter unfamiliar glowing caverns and grottoes through accidental circumstance. 7anderers, lost in a storm, find caverns of wonderful radiant treasuries in places they can never relocate.

There are those whose lust for power drives them to ac#uire the lost elements through evil sorceries. There are mysterious alchemists who stumble on the strange minerals, taking them by night from their "sacred resting place". 7orking their excessive "treatments and chemical labors" until the magick is released, they often become the terrors of the countryside. Evil alchemists, betraying the sacred calling, challenge rule and dominion. 7orking feats of mind magick and enslaving the populace, they portray the dangers associated with the misuse of magickal technology. ( hero is usually summoned by a rival good wi,ard to destroy such evil alchemists. The fabled confrontations always pits magick against magick, the hero having been given an e#ually great talisman by which to succeed. +ove is the key to winning the battle. +ove stimulates the radiant gems. 6reedy and ruthless hunters steal them from forgotten temples, plucking red glowing gems from the eyes of idols with rude steel knives. 7hen the "wonder elements" are lost, they are lost through misuse and pride. They are often taken from the wicked by mysterious and protective guardians of humanity. 2ealous and hapless fools accidentally drop their radiant stolen pri,e into wells, seas, burning pools, and crevasses of ice. The magickal elements and radiant stones are often lost just after certain worthy persons have been blessed by their magick. These materials seem impossible for most humans to keep. The loss of the wonder elements is always attended by great sadness and regret. Those who lose them are shunned, their villages fading into a disappointing and lackluster future. 0n the closing verses of these stories, one is always taught to expect their re5emergence. 'opeful that the rediscovery of lost elements will raise society into a clarified future, there are always promised signs by which we know of their appearance on earth. 7orld conscious revolution always re#uires the radiant rocks. These mysterious "lost elements" and "radiant stones" continually emerge from the deepest memories of humanity. Their re5emergence in the social symbolic lexicon is irrepressible. The greatest themes of modern science fiction are all archaic in origin. Their symbols, however updated and modified, have arcane roots. The archetypal image of both the eternal lantern and the magickal elements reappeared with the "6reen +antern" comic book series of the 9:;<*s, where the eternal emerald lantern from another world conferred its power to one who would justly bear the magick ring. !harging the ring by the eternal radiance of the emerald lantern, the ring5bearing knight swears to protect the world from evil. 'e then learns the secret psychotronic power of the ring. 7hile the images of .rester 2ohn*s fabulous courtroom illuminated the minds of those who thrilled to their hearing, a new and unexpected materiali,ation was historically chronicled.

%o dramatic an episode in human history, it yet demands a complete bibliomantic examination. There was an instance in time, a true psychosocial event, in which archetype met human desire in material form.

8(=0(&T 81!-

=uring the late iddle (ges, a great variety of remarkable "radiant rocks" were suddenly and unexpectedly discovered. These discoveries emerged from the mountainous regions of !entral Europe in continual waves. 0t was the country folk who found them. (pproaching in a timid, childlike wonder they saw the impossible. ( powerful and unusual radiance was found emerging through the very rocks of the mountainsides. +ight seemed to be streaming out of the hillsides> The brilliant green and blue mineral light was seen among familiar mountain rocks after sundown. (s reported, the light was brilliant, far above the brightest light of the full moon. ost of the first fortunate individuals who made these discoveries were not scholars or craftsmen. Typically, they were shepherds, mountain villagers, pilgrims, and wanderers? the innocents whom angelic hosts historically visit with messages of love. The glowing rocks seemed to be windows on some underground domain. .ossibly from unknown cavern worlds beneath> &ights

were spent watching the rock radiance in absolute wonderment. The radiance was considered an apparition, a divine event. The light was beautiful, glorious, and unfamiliar. 0t brought with it the atmosphere of another world. 'ere was a new revelation, a new kind of light, which did not come from fire. The rocks gave forth a bright light, bright enough to illuminate the faces of those who stared into them in disbelief. Though shining for hours with no other energy source, this cold rock5light would not die> Those who discovered these strange glowing rocks believed themselves to have been favored by miraculous visitation, answers to fervent re#uests. %tories began emerging from different parts of the world concerning these very same radiant rocks. %ome of these were given names. %ome were associated with the saints. 1thers were simply named for those who found them, or the place from which they were dug. ( few brave souls were not afraid to attempt sampling the find. Unearthed, pieces were brought indoors. Though separated from their parent rock mass, they continued illuminating cabin interiors with their rare and cold radiance. Undying fire. !old, pure endless light> ost of the rocks came from familiar regions, yet their radiance was never before seen. 0nnumerable opportunities existed for the observation of the brilliant and spontaneous radiance. )ut, why had no one reported such wonders" 'ad no one ever seen these lights before" The shepherds who fre#uented those very places had crossed and recrossed their gra,ing paths for countless centuries. @et, they had seen nothing unusual. !ertainly nothing this noteworthy was ever observed by anyone familiar with the very terrain in which the manifestations had taken place. This e#ually profound and perplexing mystery now formed additional evidence concerning the radiant rocks, one which surrounded them with an additional and inescapable aura. 0t was apparent that these were divinely inspired events, utterly new creations. This was the accompanying awareness, which boosted their fame into public consciousness. !lergy and monastics became enthralled...humbled by the notion that science and theology were not, as most had assumed, separate experiences. (rchetype, visionary desire, and natural reality had been brought into material fusion. The radiant rocks foretold a coming dawn, an (ge of +ight perhaps> $or the people of this time period, the phenomenon was material evidence of the ancient faith. The glory of these special radiant crystals brought about a curious form of devotion. Taken as miraculous signs, each were displayed before persons of both low and high estate. !athedrals displayed them for the common folk. The rocks were seen as sacred artifacts, befitting the treatment rendered toward relics. .rivate viewings, accompanied by all the pageantry of liturgical service, were held before the courts of kings.

'ere was a new breath of promise, a silent comforting word. 0n this atmosphere of prayerful silence, the miraculous stones radiated their eerie green or blue light to the wonderment of all who beheld in silent awe. !ertain varieties were exceedingly brilliant, some reporting a radiance far above the brilliance of full moonlight. 0n a few other instances the report of radiant brilliance approaching sunlight was confirmed by credible authorities. Those who worshipfully ga,ed at these rocks in the silent cathedrals awaited metaphoric answers. 0t was difficult to imagine that former scholars had separated innervision and external &ature, calling the one "fantasy" and the other "reality". 0n the clear light of these wonder rocks there was some powerful sense of a lost innocent world and its wonderful radiant vitality. ( new and striking atmosphere seemed to capture all the scholars who approached the brilliant rocks. 6a,ing into their wondrously bright and seemingly endless radiance, one had the sense that the =ivine .resence was mystically shining through "corrupt matter". 0t was light from death, the complete antithesis of the fire paradigm. 'ere, the production of light did not re#uire the death of living thing. The light did not emerge through the consumption of fuels, the soul of the green forest. This matter was not "corrupt". This was a rare kind of matter, unknown except for the legends and fables, which accurately described them in every detail. 7ith each discovery of a new radiant mineral, more proof was added to the ancient belief that !reative +ight had not indeed abandoned the world of tears. 7here death seemed the ruling power, it was the light of these rare gems, which heralded sweet proof that =ivine +ove was yet reaching for humanity. Those who both studied and reported their experiences with these radiant rocks certainly knew the comparative illuminating power of candles and bonfires. 7hen they likened the brilliance of these strange rocks to full moonlight or of sunlight, they were neither being scientifically primitive or emotionally excessive. 0t is astounding to recount the historical density of such finds during the early 8enaissance. (rcane journals and manuscripts contain anecdotes of these discoveries, although found with difficulty in widely scattered fragments. They are the remains of notable past events in the indelible historic record. %cholarly minds reeled under the dream5impact of possible new technologies. The wonders, which could emerge from the proper implementation of these rocks, would take some time to fully develop. 7ould these rocks respond to the mind" 7ould they influence actions without contact" !ould they be used to move heavy objects" !ould they make one invisible or invincible" 0t is very significant that those who sought the development of radiant technology used the very archetypes of legend to guide their efforts.

There were those who now ran to the mountains in search of radiant rock. any new varieties were found, but few gave the rare radiance produced by the original finds. +arge crystals of fluorite and barite were torn from mountain scarps. 'aving been exposed to intense sunlight, each was then methodically taken into dark chambers for examination. 0n the clutches of secular scholars who sought purely mechanistic explanations, the comparatively weak glow of these rocks also remained incomprehensible. They did not e#ual those, which had previously been found. 7ords and logic failed to explain what &ature had revealed. +ate 8enaissance science was searching everywhere for more examples of this wondrous rock luminescence. (s continual examples of these fluorescent phenomena were found, science could do nothing more than simply collate the evidence. %oon, a large collection of minerals and experiences had been patiently compiled. @et, none of the forthcoming finds #uite e#ualed those early and spectacular events, which heralded the discovery of the famed radiant rocks of Europe. &ever was such a singularly religious treatment of the phenomenon ever seen again? and it is indeed curious that the radiant intensity of later retrieved rocks, mostly barites and fluorites, did not match those reported during the first spectacular wave of discovery. The original stones surfaced in the courts of various nobles throughout the 8enaissance, the coveted possessions of rulers. Their appearance and disappearance followed the rise and fall of their power. 0t has been impossible to trace the whereabouts of these rare gems whose great radiant intensity was "frightening". =iscoveries of natural radiance such as these never made their appearance in Europe. 0n the absence of newer reports, these remain inexplicable. %pontaneous sources of light made their appearance throughout the following centuries, but the truly great radiant light sources seemed to have dimmed once more. 0n this, the scholar is faced with a mystery. 7hat is the reason for their appearance and disappearance down through the centuries"

&E7 8(=0(&!E
7hen the element "phosphoro" was discovered in 9AA:, the frightened alchemist )randt fell down in silent prayer. 'e is often depicted in this poise at moment of discovery. $ascinated preoccupation with radiant rocks and other related phenomena always re5emerged with each new century. They came with great regularity during the Eighteenth !entury, mostly associated with bioluminescent phenomena. +uminous insects, fungi, coral, fish, mushrooms, and so forth. The light they gave was neither eternal, nor radiant. These were

again heralded ... but not with the great sense of awe or religious reverence rendered to those first wondrous manifestations. There were those who grew accustomed with the "disappointing" nature of #uests and natural finds. This sad tendency became the "expected outcome" of belief in any kind of visionary artifact. =isappointment and hopelessness was associated with the #uest for dream archetypes in material nature. &evertheless, several significant discoveries continued to overthrow this negative worldview, vindicating those who expect the natural world to surprise them. ( mysterious radiant stone was discovered in !onnecticut during the latter 9A<<*s by a r. %teele. +iving in East 'addam at the time, r. %teele discovered a truly marvelous and precious stone, which he claimed visibly, radiated incredible volumes of light. 'e confided secretly with his landlord, a r. -nowlton, that he would soon be able to procure it in secret. 'e referred to the stone as "the carbuncle", relating that a huge sum of money would be theirs to share if only the secrecy could be maintained until time of disclosure. r. %teele seemed to infer that he had found a large deposit of the white material, and this increased the earnest expectations of his landlord. )y night, r. %teele brought the "white rounded carbuncle" back to the boarding house under thick covers. =espite the attempt at cloaking the stone, it glowed with an intensely penetrating radiance. 0n the dark, the light grew to an incredible and anomalous proportion, far exceeding that of sunshine. This material was secreted into the cellar of the house, one "not having any windows". There, r. %teele "worked on the material by night", performing chemical operations on the substance. =espite the thick stonewalls, the light of this stone "shone right through" to the outer meadows. %o great was its penetrating strength that the entire house appeared illuminated by fire, being seen at very great distances by curious others. 0n addition to this mystery, large and continual booming sounds were heard surrounding the stone and the house. r. %teele stated that these sounds emanated from the stone. 'e labored on the stone every night until it was impossible to hide the secret any longer from neighbors. r. -nowlton, the landlord, thought it bewitched by 0ndian sorcery and angrily warned r. %teele to cease his evil acts. 7rapping the carbuncle in sheet lead and taking on a disguised appearance, he fled from the town by sailing ship. )ecause of the stone*s remarkable luminescence and e#ually powerful thunder, it was impossible to hide the stone. 0t has been presumed that the sailors, superstitious and frightened of the accursed carbuncle, simply threw him overboard with the object in his grasp. England, %teele*s intended destination, was never reached by him. The stone, of course, was lost.

The large mysterious stone was original dug out of a very specific hillside, known by the residents of the area. $rom descriptions given by the now5late r. %teele, a local cleric found the very spot. The cleric is the same gentleman, a man of impeccable character and irreproachable honesty, who wrote the journal from which the tale was derived. 'e spoke of the existence of the mystery carbuncle as a fact, in greatest confidence. The cleric said that lightning was fre#uently drawn into the hillside at that very point, loud booming noises constantly emanating from the place regardless of the weather. The place was also known to the &ative (mericans, who treated the district as a sacred spot. .uritans believed the place bewitched, and avoided it with great terror. &o mention was ever made of the strange substance again. 7hile sounding completely fanciful, such stones were actually observed in &ew 6uinea by numerous traders who managed to penetrate the high mountains of ount 7ilhemina. These adventurers reported that native villages employed large "balls of stone" to brilliantly light the night darkness. The giant glowing stones were exceedingly bright, resembling "suspended moons". These filled the jungle region with their radiance, giving a surreal #uality to the place. The source of the mysterious light found, those of the expedition were completely astounded. .oised high on very large pedestals, the huge white balls of stone glowed with a brilliance e#ual to that shed by electric lanterns. Their light did not fade with time. (nother such account came through 0on 0driess, a famed (ustralian writer. (borigine elders, while recounting island history to him, reported the existence of "the booyas". These were large balls of stone, which glow with an eerie magickal light. Three of these stone "scepters" were known in the area. .oised on tall pedestals of bamboo, the light shed by the booyas was so bright that it enveloped its spectators. 'eld up toward the sky, the stone flashed with a brilliant cold green light, and was thus "charged". /illages thus illuminated by greenish white brilliance were seen far off at sea. The diary of a con#uistador 3)arco !entenera, 9A<94 told of a similar, if not exact, stone ball lantern. The setting was .araguay, in the city of 6ran oxo. There he reported discovering a huge stone pedestal, some twenty5four feet in height. This pillar was surmounted by a huge ball of stone, which shone with such brilliance that it illuminated both the lake and the inhabited area. The English !olonel ..'. $awcett reported hearing of cities in the same %outh (merican jungles whose people employed a similarly strange means for illuminating their night times. These were the very same kinds of cold green balls of stone, poised on very tall stone pedestals. !olonel $awcett, of utmost integrity, sacrificed his life while seeking the ruins of these lost cities. 'is

#ualified opinion was that these places were "contemporary remnants" which retained the forgotten knowledge of ... much older civili,ations. There are those who claim to have retained some portions of these legendary materials. &icholas 8oerich, symbolic master artist, traveled to ongolia in 9:BC after learning from monks of a famed stone, which "fell from 1rion". %ecuring the stone on behalf of the monastery in which it was housed, he claimed to have discovered its ama,ing mind5expanding #ualities. )oth &icholas and 'elena 8oerich accompanied a fragment of the stone to a neighboring monastery where it was enshrined. These sacred stones, elements of the first world &ature, were said by him to radiate a sharply defined consciousness. The monks attested to the ability of this stone to "maintain peace and elevate consciousness to all the outlying districts". 0n these mountainous lands, timeless traditions preserve what centuries of European history would have erased. !ould this have been the very stone, which arco .olo had reported" 7as this one of the "magickal stones" employed by .rester 2ohn" The couple returned home, encrypting the truth of this remarkable find in a series of mystical books 3"1n Eastern !rossroads", "+egend of The %tone", (bode of +ight"4.

E+E!T80! 81!&umerous explanations for the phenomena of luminescence and phosphorescence flood the technical literature of the day. Each seek mechanistic explanation for the remarkable radiance of certain materials and apparatus. =espite these academic speculations, the phenomena of luminosity and phosphorescence represent some very essence of our deepest dreams and mythic desires. %trange light sources form the heart of all artifices of legendary magick. These are fascinating archetypes, which surpass our merely intellectual fixations. 7hy their mere mention fills us with an awesome reverence has much deeper source. Each new technological epoch is always accompanied by the emergence of new and remarkable light sources. $rom the latter part of the nineteenth century until the middle 9:;<*s there was an abundant emergence of such devices. 7hile many of these "lanterns" re#uired the forced generation of energies, there were a significant number of devices, which did not. 0n the following account, we will see that the fables of "lost magickal elements" and "radiant rocks" are grounded in truth.

=r.

oray

"2 started my e periments with the ta$ing of electricity from the ground, as 2 termed it, during the summer of ,8.8. 4y fall of ,8,. 2 had sufficient power to operate a small electrical device, and 2 made a demonstration of my idea to two friends... "his demonstration in the early stages consisted of operating a miniature arc light... 2t soon became evident that the energy was not static and that the static of the universe would be of no assistance to me in obtaining the power 2 was see$ing... During the Christmas Holidays of 1911, I began to fully realize that the energy I was working with was not of a static nature, but of an oscillating nature. Further I realized that the energy was not coming out of the earth, but instead was coming to the earth from some outside source. hese electrical oscillations in the form of wa!es were not sim"le oscillations, but were surgings ### like the

wa!es of the sea ### coming to the earth continually, more in the daytime than at night, but always coming in !ibrations from the reser!oir of colossal energy out there in s"ace. $y this time I was able to obtain enough "ower to light the old 1%#candle"ower carbon lam" for about one half ca"acity, and I did not seem to make any further im"ro!ement until the s"ring of 19&'.(
=r. Thomas 'enry oray, an electrical engineer, began research on aerial static generators in 9:9<. 'e succeeded in deriving usable electrical energy from the earth*s electrostatic field. any others had achieved similar results in the century preceding =r. oray. .atents of "aerial batteries" fill the archives 3/ion, 7ard, =ewey, .alenscar, .ennock, .lausen4. Their remarkable efficiency re#uired only the establishment of elevated stations in appropriate places, each differing in the actual mode of extracting the atmospheric energies. %ome of these aerial battery systems successfully provided the utility re#uirements of small factories and telegraphic exchanges. =r. oray was fascinated with the concept of drawing electrical energy directly from the environment. 'is initial and primitive tests brought a modest amount of electrical energy from his aerial battery design, producing clicking tones in a telephone receiver. 7ith this device, he gradually developed enough atmospherically derived energy to light a small neon "arc lamp". =r. oray was encouraged, but not satisfied with these results. There had to be a way to get much more energy from the environment. %tatic5field systems are necessarily tall aerial structures, re#uiring a great deal of space. %ome designers used large balloons to hoist their static collectors. 1thers simply utili,ed fixed structuresD large mountain5poised screens, point5 studded poles. )enjamin 7ard used an astounding "directional chute" which "funneled" electrostatic winds. (erial batteries relied on the surface area of structures to absorb electrostatic charges. The larger the system, the more the available electrical power. oray wanted to miniaturi,e these large systems. 0f miniaturi,ation was to be the design goal, there would be a necessary and revolutionary change in the approach. 7hile investigating the output of his device, he discovered a feature of the natural static energy, which had somehow been overlooked by other aerial battery designers. The electrostatic power had a flimmering, pulsating #uality to it. 'e learned of this "static pulsation" while listening through headphones, which were connected to telephone wires. The static came in a single, potent

surge. This first "wave" subsided, with numerous "back surges" following. %oon thereafter, the process repeated itself. The static surges came "like ocean waves". 0ndeed, with the volume of "white noise" which they produced, they sounded like ocean waves> These peculiar waves did not arrive with "clock precision". 2ust like ocean waves, they arrived in schedules of their own. =r. oray was convinced that these were world5permeating waves. 'e came to believe that they represented the natural "cadence of the universe". This intriguing characteristic suggested that small amounts of pulsating electrostatic charge might be used to induce large oscillations in a large "tank" of charge. The resultant oscillating power would be applied to industrial use. )ut experiments in these avenues were not very promising. =r. oray believed that the earth*s natural electrical energies were derived from the mineral content of the ground. 'e therefore began examining minerals with a rare devotion. Everywhere he went, mineral hunting was the first impulse. These minerals became #uite a collection. Each was examined in his small laboratory to discover any possible new electrical properties, which might reveal the truth of his ideas. There was practical truth in his first suppositions. The early days of 8adio utili,ed mineral crystals to detect signals. Tesla was perhaps first in announcing that selenium crystals could detect the special rays with which he was principally occupied. Thereafter several different personalities claimed to have "discovered" the crystal detection method. Essentially solid state in nature, the method uses mineral crystals to "detect" radio signals. $ine wires 3"catwhiskers"4 touched mineral surfaces at specific "sensitive points" and were tuned with a small coil. 1ne could receive radio signals without batteries by employing this detector. 7hen connected with an aerial, a ground rod, variable coil tuner and headphones, the resulting "crystal set" provided a means for receiving strong radio signals. (s children, many of us had these little crystal sets. They are still popular and may be purchased for a few dollars in science shops today. %ince the crystal was the key to better radio reception, experimenters were searching the mineral kingdom for new and more sensitive detector crystals. Early radio maga,ines taught the eager hobbyist how to mount special radiosensitive mineral crystals. There were several favorites of which radio hobbyists were very fond. ( brilliantly reflective metallic crystal having a silvery blue cast, 6alena was the mineral of choice. .yrite, otherwise known as "fool*s gold", is a close second to 6alena. (s a radio detector, .yrite gives a good signal strength in the headphones. %ome preferred olybdenite, a mineral that is especially sensitive to infrared energy as well as radiosignals. 8adio amateurs were always trying new mineral crystals to see which ones

amplified radio stations with greater strength and clarity. Each had their favorite crystals. +ittle did the radio enthusiasts know why there was mystery in this #uest for "radiant crystals"> (dvancing the science of crystal radio detection, certain researchers discovered that contact5combinations of minerals gave stronger signal amplifications. 7hen carborundum and silicon crystal nuggets were pressed together with little springs in a metal tube, the signal strength was enormous. %mall battery voltages turned these mineral detectors into amplifiers, early transistor5like detectors. )i5mineral and bi5metallic hybrids were tried with good results. ineral5metal, mineral5mineral, even multiple minerals in contact with two different metals produced enormous magnifications of signal strength. %ome detectors incorporated carnotite, a radioactive mineral. This greatly increased conductivity with a resultant enormous signal magnification. !oating aerial points and catwhiskers with autonite, another mild radioactive mineral, produced amplified signals. There were small companies, which manufactured synthetic minerals 3"8adiocite" and "8ussonite"4. These claimed superiority in the signal5boosting ability. There were scores of other sensitive minerals, which gradually appeared in the journals, some natural and rare, and some synthetic compositions. 0n light of these wonders, a full5scale assault on the mineral kingdom was launched by both private and government research labs. 0t was discovered again that the mineral world is not simple. The mineral world is mysterious and locale5specific. Each ground site where minerals are found evidences uni#ue mineral combinations and admixtures. The special #ualities of identical mineral species can vary completely among geographic points. 6alena contains critical element traces, which differ completely among mining sites. 0t was found that 6alena, taken from certain special sites in -ansas, gave an excessively clear signal output with high volume. This natural 6ermanium rich variation placed it far above other galena samples in radio5 sensitivity. 0n addition, these crystals visibly differ from 6alena taken from other places, having a rare blue green hue.

681U&= E&E86@
!rystal sets were the ruling radio technology in the early 9:<<*s. +istening to radio stations through a crystal set is still a treat> The sounds are startling clear ... and loud. (n old neighbor told how his great5uncle so tuned the crystal set that "everyone in the house could hear the music". ost crystal radio sets are "unpowered" radios. The entire study field of unpowered radios

has been receiving enough attention lately for the publication of several books on the subject. The anomalous strength of crystal radio signals has much to do with design, conductivity, crystal #uality, aerial surface, and ground contact. 0n many cases, the aerial may be completely eradicated when the ground connection is "right". 0n fact, the aerial can be eradicated, but not the ground. 0t is the ground connection, which is all5important.

+tu##le%ield

(mateurs are rediscovering that specific ground points emanate radio signals in sufficient #uantities to power loudspeakers> 8ecent reports from three independent researchers reveal that crystal radio reception through ground connection alone is shockingly powerful. The developed radio power in these crystal radio receivers was so strong that volume controls were installed to limit the output sound> (ccording to each report, crystal received radio signals actually seemed to "grow in strength" with time. The anomalous growth is one, which numerous researchers have noted. The pattern follows the "vegetative growth" which 8eichenbach observed in his "1dic" energy and which %tubblefield saw in his "electrical earth waves". /egetative growth patterns appear as a gradually increasing signal, reaching frightening volumes at the maximum. 0n one such instance, the weak signal strength re#uired headphones. 7ithin several days however, the headphones had to be replaced with a small loudspeaker. This loudspeaker was then replaced by a much larger diameter horn. $inally, the horn had to be disconnected periodically because neighbors complained of the "outrageous booming sound". /egetative signal growth. &ot an electrical characteristic. 1ne may view the crystal radio receiver as a tuner of crystal ad, the radio signals and other electrical values merely appearing as epiphenomena 3 einke4. 8ecall that 8eichenbach hoped to use 1d in a new non5electrical technology, and that later pioneers developed 8adionic instruments to these ends. The engineering convention of the early Twentieth !entury had not yet reali,ed the active appearance of these more fundamental energies in their circuits, as did their predecessors in the telegraph industry. The idea of obtaining and using "ground energy" is covered in secrecy. 7hat would happen to fossil fuel companies were it even suspected that vast electrical energy could be simply pulled from the ground at specific points" These energies began "making their appearance" during the years of

telegraphy. 7ell placed telegraphic ground plates were able to operate with energy simply taken from the ground. %everal early telegraph lines historically continued signaling among stations, though their batteries had been "dry and dead" for several years> 0 spoke to an engineer who saw this kind of system operation when yet a teenager. %eeing this strange system in full working order so impressed him that, developing that rare taste, he forever sought such anomalies as a lifelong passion. &umerous articles from the last century retell exact details concerning these phenomena. 0t is possible to demonstrate its principle with ground rods and galvanometers. @es, there is great energy in the earth, vast natural energy that is accessible only in specific points. )ut the true and fundamental identity of that energy has been #uestioned. ost #ualified investigators observe that ground energy does not "begin" as electricity. Electricity from the ground only appears after several natural stages of transformation. /egetative growth. This is evidenced in old telegraph lines where measured currents do not provide ade#uate wattage for the activities, which are thereafter observed in the components. This was especially true for the forgotten chemical telegraph systems, where scarcely any electrical current managed the successful exchange of strong signals. The forgotten science of selecting "special ground sites" is re5emerging among /+$ radio researchers. &o two5ground sites are ever the same. 0t is possible to probe around in a garden with simple meters and metal rods to prove this claim. Touching carbon and iron rods to the ground registers as currents 1&+@ when specific points are touched. 0t is fascinating to find extremely active sensitivity spots immediately adjacent to points, which produce absolutely no response in meters. The effects measurably increase despite rod separations. 0n no manner can these be referred to as "electrolytic" or "battery actions", since the re#uirement for best energy extraction by this method is dry ground. 8ainwater destroys these effects. oreover, it is only when the right ground contacts are made that one will watch the meter "pin". There the meter will remain until the rods are removed. %uch energetic discharges can continue for months> 8emoving the rods, however, produces a more astounding phenomenon. The meter, dropping to ",ero", does not rise again when the rods are replaced in their very same ground5points. 1ne can lift one rod out of its well, watch the meter drop, and then instantly replace the rod with no resultant energy rise. 6round energy withdraws in a manner suggestive of "biological irritation". Each of these phenomena may be demonstrated to personal satisfaction with very simple apparatus.

T'E %7E=0%' %T1&E

=r. oray traveled to %weden as a missionary of the ormon !hurch in 9:99, visiting relatives for a summer. 'e fre#uently hiked through the lovely green meadows and blue mountain ridges to examine and collect more minerals. 'ere, in the historical land of gnomes, he found an unexpected treasure. )ut it was this part of his biography, which separated =r. oray from fictions and fables. 0t was during one such mineral expedition that =r. oray found a soft, silvery white mineral, which greatly attracted his attention. =espite his great difficulty in obtaining the necessary parts for even a simple laboratory examination, he found that silver cat5whiskers produced electrical rectification. 7hen the silver contacts touched the mineral, the stone would pass battery currents in one direction. )elieving that this material might be useful as a new industrial radio product, he stored a good #uantity of the stone for his voyage back to (merica. =r. oray never elaborated on the "discovery" portion of his story. 'e mentioned only that he obtained the material from two separate %wedish sources. The first samples were crystalline, being found in a hillside outcropping of rock. The second, a smooth white powder, was scraped from a railroad car in (bisco. )oth materials were identical in composition. &o doubt, he wished to secretly preserve the location of this mineral lode for future use, since he never told of the exact source location. Endowed with extremely peculiar electrical properties, the stone provoked great surprise. 0mplementing the mineral as a crystal radio detector, he discovered several unexpected phenomena in #uick succession. =r. oray discovered that radio signals were so amplified by this mineral that headphones were destroyed by the current. 'e then scaled up the output to accommodate a very large loudspeaker. Tuning in any station produced excessively high volumes of sound without external power> The fact that these crystal radio receivers re#uired no extra power when achieving these activity levels suggested new experiments. 'is assessment of the mineral was mystical. 'is perplexing comment had no prior e#ual in the electrical world. "7hat 0 have found is a mineral radio detector, having self5amplifying abilities". &ow, bright blue5white sparks were observed playing along the thin wire connections around the mineral at specific station settings. ysterious> 0ncredible> The stone provoked a world of theoretical "problems". (ny device with "self5amplifying abilities" is necessarily drawing its power from somewhere. )ut, from what place of origin was this "%wedish %tone" drawing

its self5amplifying abilities" (ccording to convention, there were no such sources to be found. Unable to yet find an answer, he modified his theory on earth electricity. 'e came to believe that natural earth electricity was entirely developed through special minerals like the one he found. inerals, he reasoned, were able to modify more fundamental energies, which emerge from the ground. =uring the process, electrostatic charge is developed. This is why the earth maintains its charge. 0t possibly explained why the earth static5charge also "flimmered" in pulsations. 7hatever causative energy was manufacturing the charge in minerals was obviously a pulsating one. There was no precedent for the peculiar behavior of this mineral. &o existing electrical explanations for the activities whatsoever. =espite his inability to comprehend why the stone performed these marvels, =r. oray continued his empirical experiments. 0n the process, he developed several modifications of his original theory. )ased on strong intuitions, he formed a doctoral thesis in 9:9E, postulating the existence of a "sea of energy" from which all future power would be derived.

!8U!0)+E 1$ T'E %T(8%

These events all took place in the obscure privacy of =r. oray*s early life. 0n 9:9F he was married. 'e managed to obtain several successive engineering jobs, all the while pursuing his dream of deriving energy from the earth. )etween 9:9E and 9:B9 he was unable to pursue this experimental work for any sustained time, the happy duties of work and family life absorbing all his attentions. 'is engineering employment record is prestigious, considering the time frame. 'e was employed as =esigner and Engineer by the Utah .ower and +ight !ompany, Engineer for the .hoenix !onstruction !ompany, (ssistant !hief Engineer for the (rastard !onstruction !ompany, and =ivision !hief Engineer for the ountain %tates Telephone and Telegraph !ompany. 'aving labored on his mineral through a sudden inspiration, he now advanced the operation of the device, a cylinder of eight5inch diameter and six inches height. Utili,ing an aerial and a good ground rod, =r. oray successively powered both a 9<<5watt incandescent lamp and a ACC5watt heater. 0t was found that deeper ground rods produced visibly brighter lights. The world did hear from =r. oray in 9:BC. There, in %alt +ake !ity, he began performing wonders with his new "energy receiver". %everal local witnesses observed these experimental proceedings. 0t was seen that power increased with increasing ground rod depth. 'e now approached several authorities in hopes that the invention be given proper

treatment in an established research laboratory. Then, he anticipated that the industrial groups who handled power generation would be the most reasonable people to contact for the deployment of his revolutionary technology. 0n that 1ctober, =r. oray brought witnesses from the %alt lake !ity 6eneral Electric !ompany in order to formally disclose his discovery. The demonstrations proceeded as before. =r. oray showed that the removal of either the aerial or the ground caused power to fade, proving the external source of the energy. %everal #ualified witnesses arrived from )righam @oung University to observe the device in action. Themselves engineers, he allowed them to examined and dismantle the device completely so that there would be no accusation of fraud. They even tore the boards open to see if there were any concealed transformer coils or batteries, which would account for the tremendous power production. &o fraud could ever be found in this severe examination. The one component, which =r. oray would never show the others, was the si,e of a pocket watch. 0n it was his precious "%wedish %tone". 0n a strange way, in a most remarkable way, =r. oray had found an eternal lamp> This caught all the authorities off guard. !areful to watch over and protect every rigidified dogma and institution, the guarded hierarchies of self5centered authority were shaken from their foundations. (cademic authorities declared that =r. oray*s device was simply receiving energy from power lines or local radio stations. They demanded that he take the device to various locales in order to pinpoint both the true source of the energy and establish operation criteria. &o industrial development of the device would be considered, they stated, until he complied with the stated re#uirements. Taken across the countryside in hopes of reali,ing the failure of the device, these academicians were thunderstruck when the device continued operating. 0t was impossible to find a place where the output showed any slight drop in power. The device worked during snowstorms, rainstorms, and in deep mineshafts. 0t was sealed in a metal vault, dragged many miles away from power lines, and taken to mountainous terrain, which did not sustain any radio reception. 0n each location the device suffered not one degree of diminished output. (ppliances usually tested simultaneously in these desert locales included thirty5five lamps each rated at one hundred fifty watts, a one thousand watt hand iron, a heater, and a fan. oray himself wished to test whether the device would drive a plane or submarine. The device was taken up in a plane and submerged in a watertight container at the bottom of a lake. 0n each case the output remained the same.

1nce, while demonstrating the device before a group of electrical engineers, a sudden sustained dark blue spark of some eight inches length was observed. 7hen the engineers saw this, they were truly ama,ed, as the spark discharged from one of the output leads into midair. The incoming energy had actually momentarily exceeded the sustaining ability of the receiver. 1bviously, this energy was coming in "from the outside". 0t was later found that this blue "spark energy" was a current, which could penetrate several solid plates of glass. %ome analysts identified this display with "high fre#uency electrostatic" energy, but this was an impossible conclusion, since the glass5conducted current could perform all the same energetic wonders as if passing through metal wire. The #uestion was then to address the exact nature of the receiver*s current output. 7as this a different kind of electrostatic energy" 7ere the output currents of a different "species" altogether" &ow, =r. oray guarded his detector with special care. The new component was no longer the si,e of a small pocket watch. The modified detector looked like a small crucible with its cover5welded shut. This, oray removed and placed in his pocket whenever the tests were completed. 'e later revealed the nature of the device, stating that it contained a piece of the soft "%wedish %tone" and "a few extra additives". ( few close associates were permitted to examine this component. There was nothing more than what his drawings showed in its metallic shell. The whole secret lay in the nature of the mineral, the lost and miraculous mineral. The radiant stone. 7hat remarkable truth did =r. oray learn" 'ow had he managed to transform his device into this veritable powerhouse"

%.(!E 8(@%
@ears before this demonstration, the absence of reasonable academic explanations forced =r. oray to plunge into study. .reparation for his thesis re#uired a substantial personal library, which he had gradually ac#uired. 0n the process, he secured several rare fifty5year5old volumes on radioactivity. These included the theories of &ikola Tesla and =r. 6ustav +e )on, both of whom had each published extensively on the subject. Tesla*s theory of radioactivity has never been ade#uately appreciated, despite the fact that he was first in demonstrating the existence of cosmic rays. 7hen announced, after a period of intense investigation, Tesla was heckled by the (merican academic community. )ut, long before 'enri )ec#uerel and arie !urie investigated radioactivity, &ikola Tesla first called attention to the notion that matter was spontaneously converting into energy. (s this process, Tesla

stated, was an eternal one.teady external shower of stimulating "cosmic" rays was penetrating all matter. These "cosmic rays" bombarded and disintegrated all matter. The process was measurably increased during the daylight hours because, Tesla stated, the bombarding rays come from the sun. These external rays were possessed of incredible electrical potential. Tesla cited particle potentials exceeding "one hundred million volts". 'e said that he had measured these potentials with "special" detectors. These might have been selenium detectors in vacuum bulbs, as used in his radio receiver patents. The electrified particles were constantly bombarding all materials, causing radioactivity to be observed. Tesla stated that all matter was in the eternal disintegration process. 'e claimed that the more dense metal elements were more easily recogni,ed as "radioactive" because the dense materials were "better targets". (ccording to this viewpoint, radioactivity was the manifestation of externally sourced agencies. Tesla insisted that the true source of radioactivity was outside, not within, matter. 8ay bombardments "from cosmic space" were his explanation. Tesla defined true cosmic rays as an entrant light5like effluve having incredible penetrating power. These were in no way similar to the conventional cosmic rays detected by 6ockel 39:9<4, 'ess 39:9B4, -ohlhorster 39:9;4 or 8obert illikan 39:BC4. Tesla viewed his discovery of these light5like effluves as holding the only promise for energy application. (ccording to Tesla, the energy of these effluves greatly exceeded those of cosmic ray "particles". 7hen oray read these ideas, he seemed to find a piece of the pu,,le, which so eluded explanation. (nother researcher, a contemporary of Tesla, succeeded in advancing the "external bombardment" theory of radioactivity with new experimental proofs. =r. 6ustav +e )on, a )elgian physicist, examined and compared ultraviolet rays and radioactive energies with great fascination. !oncluding from experiments that energetic bombardments were directly responsible for radioactivity, he was able to perform manipulations of the same. 'e succeeded in diminishing the radioactive output of certain materials by simple physical treatments. 'eating measurably slowed the radioactive decay of radium chloride, a thing considered implausible by physicists. 0n each case, +e )on raised the radium temperature until it glowed red5hot. The same retardation of emanations were observed. 'e found it possible to isolate the agent, which was actually radioactive in the radium lattice, a glowing gaseous "emanation" which could be condensed in li#uid air. 8adium was thereafter itself de5natured. )eing exposed to the external influence of bombarding rays, the radium again became active. The apparent reactivation of radium after heating re#uired twenty days before reaching its maximum value.

=r. +e )on was utterly dumbfounded when? forcing theory into fact, other colleagues announced the "immutability of radioactive decay". 'e also perceived where their erroneous logic would ultimately lead when they cited "internal instability" as the source of radioactivity. %eparating themselves once more from the external world of energy, they would lose more than they imagined themselves gaining. +e )on disagreed when physicists began isolating the heavy metals as "the only radioactive elements. 'e had already distinctly demonstrated for them that "all matter was to a degree radioactive". 'e was first to write books on the conversion of ordinary matter into rays, an activity he claimed was constant. 'e showed that this flux from ordinary matter could be measured. +e )on stated that the reason why all matter was spontaneously emanating rays was not because they were contaminated with heavy radioactive elements. 1rdinary matter was disintegrating into rays because it was being bombarded by external rays of a peculiar variety. The external source continually bombarded matter, producing a continual energetic release, "an effulgence" of energy. )ecause the energetic disintegrations of matter occurred under focused sunlight, he first cited a special photoelectric effect. )ut, judging that nuclei were actually disintegrating in this process, he saw the need for a new and "extended" photoelectric effect. atter disintegration and conversion into energy were both described in several treatises written by =r. +e )on thereafter. 'e described matter conversion processes, which may only be termed "photonuclear" in effect. 'e suggested that photonuclear reactions take place in all solar irradiated matter. +ight itself could convert ordinary matter into pure energy. Exposure to focused sunlight could demonstrably convert certain light metals into "energetic emanations". 'e traced the actual portion of the solar spectrum which first manifested this matter5converting ability, isolating it in the deep ultraviolet bands. 0n these experimental arrangements, full focused sunlight fell on metal plates with their remarkable electrostatic radioactivity the result. )ut, the natural process of radioactivity in all materials proceeded without help from experimenters. 7hat portion of the solar spectrum existed which could continually bombard matter and produce the observed radioactivity of all metals" +e )on stated that there were invisible and highly permeating solar spectra whose power could pierce buildings. They existed beyond the light rays, beyond the deep ultraviolet. Through the use of special sensitive emulsions, he demonstrated the uni#ue identity of the mysterious rays. =r. +e )on showed that he could take photographs of outdoor scenes right through laboratory walls. 'e distinguished them from ordinary infrared rays. "=ark light" he called it, identifying it with 8eichenbach*s 1d luminescence. "=ark

light" was a part of the solar spectrum, which could sufficiently penetrate all matter and disintegrate it.

=r. +e )on

.'1T1&U!+E(8 8E(!T18%
%ee The Evolution 1f atter
httpDGGwww.rexresearch.comGlebonmatGlebonmat.htm 8adioactivity was a very slow process. Elements were not being consumed every day in a rapid, uncontrolled process of dissolution. The tremendous amounts of released energy did not measurably diminish the mass of any source metal. 7hy was the radioactive process so very slow and moderate" 7hat natural condition moderated the otherwise annihilating matter5dissolving process" 0n =r. +e )on*s thesis, the photonuclear reaction involved a special "coupling action" which naturally existed between element and ray. Each element responded to a specific light energy series. 7henever the proper ray struck near the specific element, there was a disintegration "reaction". 0t was not necessary for the ray to strike the element dead5center. The mere proximity of the ray to an atom of the element was sufficient to stimulate atomic disintegration.

=isintegrated atoms could produce very distinct products of particles, forces, and rays. These products and the nature of the radioactive disintegration was determined by the element used and its specific range of resonant rays. 1ne could design a reaction by appropriately arranging elements and rays. &ot every ray, which struck near an element, could provoke the photonuclear reaction. %pecific rays and specific elements were necessarily brought together before the reaction could begin. ( "fortunate providence". $urthermore, that this bombardment was a true reaction and not just a simple collision became clear by experiment. (ccording to +e )on, the intensity of the bombarding rays was not important. 7hen deep ultraviolet rays couple with the proper "resonant" element, showers of identical rays were liberated. The photonuclear reaction was a high5yield electron reaction. !areful theoretical survey of the photonuclear reaction reveals its activity to be a high yield electron reaction. .roper entrant photons from space observably stimulate electron cascades in specific materials. Each photon was capable of stimulating the emission of countless others in a chain reaction which completely swept through the material. 0n this mounting cascade, prolific volumes of atoms were disintegrated. 1nly the presence of elemental "impurities" blocked the continual disintegration of certain elements. The photonuclear process was a chain reaction of far greater significance than those, which rely on the release of slow neutrons. %ince a single such ray could stimulate the dissolution of a great number of atoms, energetic emissions were constantly being radiated from the most ordinary of materials. 1nly the spurious and scattered nature of solar light prevented the complete annihilation of all terrestrial elements. &evertheless, the incidents in which proper rays and elements were "resonantly" disintegrating were sufficiently high to produce measurable radioactivity in all matter. =r. +e )on stated that there were solar rays having far greater potential than the deep ultraviolet. The stimulation of radioactive emissions took place in "successive stages". The complete disintegration of matter occurred when very specific gamma rays resonantly coupled with the proper elements. %uch ultra photo nuclear reactions released unimaginable amounts of energy. These photonuclear reactions were "complete". There were no intermediate particles formed by these disintegrations. Thus, only specific gamma rays could completely disintegrate a specific resonant element. 0t was by these rays that matter was completely converted into pure energy with no intermediate particles. Thus, in the absence of these gamma rays, the reactions were "incomplete" ... far less than the "peak" possible conversion into pure energy. These incomplete reactions produced

the various particles and rays, which physicists were studying as "radioactivity". !ontinuing his thesis, =r. +e )on discussed the cosmic condition, calculating the amount of energy potentially released in his photonuclear process. 0t was only the rarity of specific gamma rays and the e#ual rarity of their resonant elements, which prevented the world from dissolving in a flash. Thankfully, the earth surface elements which would dangerously explode by this process into pure energy had long been providentially been dissolved. %tars were eternal reminders of this potential. +e )on showed that rare gamma ray bombardments had indeed penetrating all matter, creating the steady conversion of matter into energy in the stars. 7hat =r. +e )on had succeeded in demonstrating was never really appreciated by those who later became enthralled and entrapped by thoughts of nuclear fission. 'e could arrange the focused action of such stimulating rays with resonant elements, incalculable volumes of energy being derived under control. The output would last for an eternity. (n eternal lantern> =r. +e )on was the very first theorist to cite "intra5atomic" energy as the future world energy source. 'e also was first to design and operate special reactors for the conversion process. +ight metals being the "fuel" for his photo nuclear reactor, he stated that matter would not be radically diminished even when the disintegration continued for a century or more. The photo nuclear process was one in which all sorts of strange intermediate particles could emerge. %ome of these might not be of the "known" particles. =r. +e )on also spoke of these as "aetheric" conversions. There were two extremes in the photonuclear process. 1ne, a range of partial conversions produced numerous particles and rays. The other involved the "complete conversion" of matter into energy. +e )on showed how specific resultant energies could be determined by "designing" the photonuclear process. 1ne can theoretically tailor these reactions to produce heat, light, motive force, projective force, attractive force ... whatsoever kind of energy is desired. 'is "intra5atomic energy" was the result of tailor5made reactions in which physicists could determine the energetic outcome with precision. 1ne could produce pure electrostatic flux with no other dangerous emissions by reactively coupling the proper rays and elements together. The absence of dangerously penetrating rays prevented the complete dissolution of terrestrial elements into energy. (ll naturally observed radioactivities were incomplete and "hapha,ard". %olar energy normally contained insufficient concentrations of both deep ultraviolet rays and more transcendent rays to release uncontrollable amounts of energy. &evertheless, =r. +e )on declared that the photonuclear process could be harnessed.

0n astonishingly simple experiments, he repeatedly demonstrated that the proper resonant coupling of rays and simple elements did release sufficient charged particle volumes to surpass those of the so5called natural radioactive elements. 'e performed this feat with both magnesium and tin in highly focused sunlight. The resultant pure electrostatic release exceeded the radiant output of radium itself> 7hen colleagues protested that he had simply evoked the "photoelectric effect", he proved them wrong by demonstrating the two effects side by side. The photoelectric effect, erroneously attributed to 'einrich 'ert,, was actually discovered by &ikola Tesla. 0t was found that ultraviolet rays could stimulate the emission of electrons from light metals. The output from this effect was enormously magnified when specific rays were matched with specific elements. 7hen this resonant coupling was arranged, the emanations were anomalous and prolific. +e )on charted the resonance of rays and elements, beginning in the deep ultraviolet. Each experiment showed that pure electrostatic energies could be extracted from the partial disintegration of light metals when very specific deep ultraviolet rays were filtered. 'e also showed the tiniest introduction of gamma rays, could stimulate complete and rapid energetic conversions in the appropriate resonant elements. 7here did the gamma rays come from" %tars radiated gamma rays earthward. 0t was the crucible of the stars.

%E( 1$ E&E86@
0n these texts oray found pieces of what he was looking for. The answer to his energy source possibly lay in rays, released from the sun and the stars. 0t was intuitive guidance perhaps, but this is all he had to work with. The +e )on photonuclear theory was the closest anyone had come toward providing oray with clues toward explaining the performance of his energy5receiving mineral. 'e came to believe that the crystalline lattice of the "%wedish %tone" was intercepting certain of these rays. The necessary research now would involve determining their exact nature. 'e would also need to discover why his strange silvery white mineral was able at all to intercept these rays. (dditionally, why was the ground connection always necessary" 0f the crucibles of the stars were converting their matter into radiant energy, then the energy received would be an eternal source. $or the moment, he looked up in thanks. The stars were supplying all the energy the world ever needed. anifestly, here was .rovidence again at work. 'ow he had managed to find the mystery substance was in itself a chance, which no one could have foreseen. 'ow he would use its power would now determine both his and the world*s destiny. Eternal lanterns>

(ccording to +e )on, universal matter is turning into energy in an unceasing photonuclear process. The process occurs in the stars, driving their vast expulsions of light and other energies. 0n doing so, they too were special radiant sources, flooding space with all kinds of rays. The sun was such a source. )eing so very near to the earth, its permeating influence could not be ignored. The sun expelled prodigious volumes of rays throughout its space. Earth received a great gale of these rays. %ome of them were visible. ost were not. &atural radioactivity was the result. (ll materials were theoretically being bombarded by these permeating rays. This was especially evident when certain materials were exposed to focused sunlight. 0f the more invisible rays of the sun were the most likely candidates for the %wedish %tone*s activity, then there should be energy maxima and minima throughout the day. (s oray read of +e )on*s elegant tabletop experiments, he could not help but marvel over the apparent conclusive #uality of his statements. !ertainly, they were pale in comparison with those, which he himself was obtaining. )ut it was the %wedish %tone, which made the difference. 7hat =r. +e )on did not have was "the stone". %omething about the structure of this stone permitted a powerful electrostatic emission possibly under the ordinary influence of solar rays. 0ts phenomenal output greatly exceeded that which was experimentally produced by any single element of natural origin. The mineral possibly held the secret to intercepting special solar rays. The mineral held the secret to releasing the staggering electrical output, which he was learning to harness. (dding his own experimental verifications to +e )on*s theory, =r. oray studied photonuclear process in materials other than elemental ones. 7hile +e )on studied pure metals 3tin, magnesium, lithium, cesium, and potassium4, =r. oray focused his attention on the crystallography of minerals. 0f it were possible to discover which rays from space activated his mineral, then perhaps it would also be possible to improve the operation of the detector. 0solating the specific rays, which he believed were responsible for the "%wedish %tone" phenomenon, would give more credence to the +e )on explanation. 0n addition, if it were possible to match synthetic microcrystalline structures with their "proper" ray energies, then he could develop even more powerful electrostatic emitters. The study was completely revolutionary. =r. oray advanced the +e )on theory to the point where it became a plausible thesis. 'e was convinced now that a "radiant sea of energy" suffused the earth. oray repeatedly stated that this "sea of energy" continually permeated the earth in energetic gusts. The rays he proposed were responsible were "from beyond the gamma ray

bands". 8ecogni,ing that these naturally prolific energies and their strange dynamics re#uired a special interceptor, =r. oray stated thatD "The most widespread and mightiest of the natural forces has remained so long unrecogni,ed ... because man lacked the reagents necessary for the proof of its existence". =r. oray had found one of those reagents in the form of a mineral crystal. (n eternal lantern> &ikola Tesla always spoke of the means by which the energy of space rays could become available to humanity. oray named his device the "!1%8(@" receiver, believing that mineral intercepted cosmic rays were causing the material to disintegrate. The disintegration process in his mineral detector was not complete, electrostatic charges being the photo5reactive products. The dream of endless power was in his possession. )ut there would be necessary new research in order to greatly intensify the output of the receiver.

8(=01(!T0/E 0 .U+%E%
Though his earliest experiments produced several kilowatts of "electrical energy", it would re#uire much longer development for his mineral to be worked into a completely potent energy source for humanity. =r. oray observed in his early experiments that the extremely powerful "electrostatic" energy came in powerful intermittent pulses. 0n circuits outfitted with a few radio5tuning components, he found it possible to "sharpen" the effect. The operation of the device was never stable in those days. +arge bluish sparks often sprang out of the connector wires, this effect having been observed in public several times during early trials. The escaping electrostatic energy was wasted because the receiver could not sustain the incoming power levels. This represented a potential of energy, which could be harnessed under the proper conditions. )ut how to sustain the tremendous power" (fter having studied the theoretical writings of =r. +e )on =r. oray believed that he had found the most probable explanation for the intermittent electrostatic bursts. 0f solar energy was an incoming gale, then that gale might not be completely homogeneous. 7hat appeared to be a steady stream might, on closer inspection, be a completely disruptive flow. 2udging from the observed solar surface, it was more likely that solar rays were being expelled in intermittent violent explosions. )oth the activity of the mineral and its unpredictable pulsing #uality could be explained if one assumed that very special space rays were arriving on the earth*s surface in solar "gusts" and "explosions". 0n his

own terms, they arrived "like huge ocean waves". "8adioactive waves" he called them. %o. The blue sparks appeared because the intermittent gamma ray pulses arrived in unpredictable bursts. &ow as he watched the radiant receiver producing its intermittent bursts of electrostatic energy he understood what was occurring. The individual impulses were potent. Each contained enough energy to run hundreds of appliances for the fraction of time during which they were received. Taken over a longer time period their intermittent nature made them generally ineffective for common utility. The solution to this major obstacle was a means by which the initial surge could be stored and thereafter "spread out" over a great time period. &ew kinds of energy components were therefore devised by =r. oray for this very purpose. =r. oray developed several novel circuits in which these components were combined and staged. %everal "!1%8(@" receiver models were developed in the process. The intermittent impulses were applied to special capacitors through e#ually special electrical "plasma switches". 8eceived burst energy was "leaked" into these components. The system then spilled out their contents into each successive output stage until the accumulation was too enormous to contain. )ack surges were blocked by appropriate components. The volume of electrostatic energy poured forth like a sustained lightning bolt. =r. oray developed a strange plasma "tube" in which the mineral was poised. There were several features of this "tube" which may be best comprehended when studying the diagrams. The mineral was poised against the inside surface of a metal crucible, pressed there by several other small beads of another substance. ( straight metal cat5whisker touched this conglomerate of beads? the lead from this was drawn outside the crucible. The whole assembly was filled with an inert gas and hermetically sealed. The crucible was referred to as the "tube". 0t was a hermetically sealed solid5state composition having a metallic envelope. This component, with all of its parent samples were soon placed in a large safe after each experiment. Experimental developments in these regards were completely empirical and thoroughly painstaking. )ut, very gradually, he had developed a number of models whose output energy was truly impressive. 'is continual work with the design was accompanied by continual private exhibitions. )etween the years 9:BC and 9:B:, he performed the tests before hundreds of #ualified personnel. 0n its most powerful embodiment, =r. oray described his "bucket brigade" of multiple staged components. ( few minutes were always re#uired in order to "tune in" the receiver. Earlier models re#uired an initial "spark start" which was supplied by a small handheld "frictive" generator. 1nce tuning was established, the energy would appear immediately, lights instantly reaching

full candlepower. =r. oray successfully developed FC<< watts through radiant energy conversions. The most powerful embodiments each supplied C< kilowatts. This output could run the needs of a small factory throughout the day. 1n several occasions there were obvious environmental "interferences" which temporarily stalled the activation phase. )ut once these were overcome, the device operated with a familiar constancy, which defied all physical rule. %harp hammer blows or physical impacts commonly interfered with the detection process. This was due to the frailty of silver wire contacts touching the "%wedish %tone" inside his special metal tube. The smaller device served as a solar observatory, a completely unexpected instrument. =r. oray could make direct observations of solar pulsations. The device followed solar patterns, producing its most powerful outputs during the day. 0t also showed a very minor corresponding change during the night. !onsidering that the outputs were so enormous, =r. oray was not disappointed. 'e was simply fascinated. The precious mineral became "more precious" when he discovered its rarity. 0dentifying the material with local varieties of the same, he found to his very great ama,ement that only the %wedish %tone produced the energetic output. This material was completely phenomenal in nature. =emonstrations with his vastly improved detector model still re#uired an aerial "absorber". The pulsating electrostatic output more powerfully manifested with taller and larger surface area aerials. &o activity occurred without the aerial and ground connections. (ctivity also vanished when the aerial was "shorted", touched, or approached in any way. The earliest photographs show a large outdoor aerial to which the receiver was necessarily attached. The unit was made less attached to this physically stationary poise when a small copper aerial was strung across the room. The need for even this aerial was also eventually replaced by an internally connected copper plate. !omprehending this re#uirement demands study of earlier writings. The cosmic rays, which Tesla reported, were "ultra material particles" which were capable of passing through glass. Tesla observed how projective cosmic rays of this kind were literally drawn into metals. This metallic focusing effect allowed a capacitative surface, effectively extending the space connectivity of the oray detector tube. The detector "tube" was really a sealed metal crucible, the metallic products fused in place and filled with argon. 0t was reasoned that space rays were focused by the detector*s metallic envelope, just as certain H58ays can be focused by appropriate metal forms. The copper plate conductively exposed more of the mineral to surrounding space, making it a more efficient focal point for the specific stimulating space rays. The one feature, which =r. oray was never able to dispense with, was the ground

connection. 6round connectivity alone made this device operate, a characteristic, which was studied with great intensity. 'is almost daily displays had notable witnesses from the region. The strange "electrical machine" became a topic of great interest among the scientific and corporate communities surrounding %alt +ake !ity. )eing the si,e of a tabletop radio receiver, the knob5covered mahogany box generated some seventy five hundred watts of electrical energy. .hotographs show that the output from this device was conducted to external appliances by two heavy cables. The total output was strong enough to brilliantly light fifteen two hundred watt lamps. (dditional power from this device operated a small flatiron, a heater, and a fan. 'e continually claimed that the detector was receiving radioactive signals from the sun and stars. oray*s device utili,ed these radioactive signals to a degree, which does not seem possible when contemporary principles are applied. =espite these theoretical boggles, history repeatedly teaches that empirical discovery rules and often contradicts what existing science considers "possible". ysteries surrounded the output currents, especially when they were applied to electrical household appliances. !urrents from the oray receiver were able to raise the candlepower of ordinary household lamps far above their normal output rating. 7hen operating such incandescent lamps, the filaments themselves never lit. )ut the gaseous spaces above the filaments became a brilliant ghost5white. oreover, the temperature of the lamps remained externally cold to the touch. %everal persons at various times reported that physical movement near the device, whether of the whole body or of hands, could throw the tuning off. This would cause the lights and other attached appliances to "go off*. 'is new receiver used several special "tubes" in parallel. These "tubes" were hermetically sealed metal containers. ( dear friend, 6abriel es, machined parts for =r. oray. Through r. es, several European craftsmen in England and 6ermany fabricated special parts for the tubes. (lfred )urrell, a local jeweler and watchmaker, soldered contacts and fine silver wires. &o one else was ever permitted to see or handle the interior of these strange metal tubes. =r. oray referred to them as "boosters" in his patent application of 9:;9 3application CC<A994. The boosters were delicate. +arge vibrations would dislodge the internal contacts, causing the operation to fail. 0n another large family gathering, =r. oray demonstrated his receiver using a long copper wire as the "absorber". %omeone asked what would happen if they touched the wire. =r. oray said that the lights would go out. 7hen then asked whether this would cause shock, they were informed that it wound not.

!urrents from the receiver produced strange optical phenomena. .hotography became very difficult when using the light from lamps lit by the receiver*s output. +arge dark spots blacked out most of the photographic detail immediately over the lamps, while the surrounding dark spot boundary gave a sharp clarity. This clarity was a visible effect, persons noting the stark details, which these lamps conferred throughout their surroundings. 0n addition, these dark spots had defined diameters, extending beyond the lamps perhaps only half a foot. The dark spot phenomenon was anomalous because the actual light radiated by the lamps photographically extended beyond the dark spot. 8ooms photographed by these lamps were awash in foggy gray regions, which seemed to hover in mid5air near people. 7hile the fogging effects were captured on film, no such phenomena could be visibly detected. $ogging could be explained if invisible ground5sourced arcs were discharging from the device into the open air surrounding the receiver. !areful examination reveals that this is so. The dark spot, which surrounds the receiver, is a "brush like" discharge of a very special energy. 0t extends in a confined perimeter surrounding the receiver. The ground connection seems implicated in this process, identical radiant black discharges having been observed in grounded radionic tuners. =r. oray understood that his energetic "waves" were incredibly small impulses of enormous power. 7as the earth capable of receiving, sustaining, and vibrating back such gamma ray impulses" 7as the earth the absorbent medium, his mineral being the converter" &ew theoretical analysis was demanded by these penetrating #uestions. otors, rebuilt to accommodate the energy supplied by the receiver, ran at extremely high speeds. They, like the lamps, also ran "cold". =r. oray reported that when they ran in the dark, they were surrounded by a violet corona. The paradox in these matters came when the current was applied to ordinary resistive heating units. 7hen properly resisted, the currents produced heat. =r. oray showed this effect in ordinary electrical floor heaters, which became red5hot. 0n his numerous public and private demonstrations, =r. oray showed that the energy receiver could light conventional lamps, rewired motors, and power heaters. 0n the largest !1%8(@ receiver, =r. oray successfully converted cosmic rays into fifty kilowatts of electrical energy. .art of his lost art, which made this fifty5kilowatt radiant receiver possible, was a special "stage5by5stage" amplification. 0t was by this staged reception and amplification 3#uoted as his "bucket brigade" amplifier4 that all the received energy was handled, being absorbed among several simultaneous channels and "spread out" into one energetic flow.

=r. oray described his multiple staged process as one by which "a small spark was expanded into a bonfire". The radiant energy from space was received through ultra5pure 6ermanium, whose cosmic ray response came through "seven window fre#uencies". The 6ermanium had to be ultra5pure, since contaminants 3arsenides4 would absorb and block released electrons of the photonuclear reaction. 7hen measured in the laboratory, each tube measured the unheard capacity of one $arad> =r. oray, a remarkably gifted electrical engineer, necessarily redesigned power transformers to efficiently handle the excessive voltage from his receiver. ( peculiar "step down" process simultaneously involved both an impulse decrease and a voltage decrease. This, achieved through successive transformers stages, successfully brought down the rapidly impulsing high voltage into a low fre#uency high5current state. The developed currents were definitely not simple electron currents, since they failed to operate conventional motors without rewiring, and operated heavy amperage appliances without heating. &o professional investigator was ever able to comprehend the operation of the oray device in electrical terms alone. 7hile the attributes of currents derived by the device seemed electrical, their overall effects were decidedly of a different nature. .hysicists continually pressed oray to repeat his explanation of his principles, hoping to get more information on its secrets. The device, so obviously successful, was a true engineering anomaly. 0n fact, presentation of the device was a "moment of truth" for many. 'ow very fortunate these men were both to have met =r. oray and to have personally witnessed the operation of his receiver> There were those colleagues who were each genuinely thrilled by his discovery. %ome postponed judgment on their assessment of the device, declaring that the actual operation might depend on some new "battery" effect. !hemical actions in the detector tube, they said, might be causing a temporary strong emission of energy. 1nly a timed test of the detector would prove this out. 0f there was such a chemical explanation for the tube performance, then time would show a gradual waning of energies received. The engineers were very anxious to see this test performed. 0t would necessarily be conducted in a "sealed" enclosure. They #uickly added that such a possibility, while detracting from the lofty concepts expressed by =r. +e )on, would be noteworthy enough if found true. This devalued criti#ue revealed a curious ignorance in so5called professionals, whose reputations were more highly pri,ed than the "moment of truth" which had arrived. oray insisted that the device relied not on any battery action, but on receptive sensitivity to the suffusive "sea of radiant energy". There were other protocols and agendas within each of these tests of course. There

were those whose fears were being continually confirmed with each successful test. These individuals reported back to their superiors, confirming the potential threat of the new technology. oray patiently obliged all of the scientific seekers during these new public tests. The improved device was repeatedly taken out beyond the inductive limits of power lines, into remote desert areas. 6rounds were driven deep, the aerial was erected, and the device was tuned. 1nce power appeared, the system was sealed and left alone. $our, five, seven days ... time mattered not. The radiant energy device continued operating. &o one ever mentioned the excessive heat, which should have come from the sealed trunk, were the current an ordinary electrical variety. &o. 0nstead, the device ran "cold". !ertain academicians, fearful of what his discovery meant for existing theory, took him to task on both his methods and theoretical assertions. 0f it were possible, these professorial committees might have convinced even oray that his device "didn*t work because ... it shouldn*t work". (cademicians now wished to study oray*s diagrams and materials "on their own". 'e freely gave them all the pertinent drawings and diagrams concerning the device, but never parted with his original %wedish %tone material. This was secretly and safely locked away from imminent theft. These professionals, eager to "get their hands on the gadget" cited oray*s "paranoia" as proof that the device was a fraud. 6overnmental monopoly being the theme of that time period in (merica, the extent of a highly coordinated "daisy chain" would now reveal the true extent of its boundaries. The 8E( was constantly intercepting =r. oray*s grant proposals through professional individuals who were connected to nationwide 8E( activities. These frustrating occupations stalled the development and proliferation of 8adiant Energy technology for two decades, while justly deriving no commitment from oray. 7ishing now to simply publish his findings in the professional journals, he found that "obtaining permission" to do so would "necessarily" come from University authorities. 1pposition now came from University bureaucrats who "refused to handle" the information. The very individual who previously congratulated oray for "having achieved the impossible", now wrote damaging letters to the very agencies from which oray hoped to receive funding. =eclaring that oray had "not sufficiently proven the validity of his claims", these letters seemed to be appearing in every energy5related government office long before oray*s formal proposals arrived. 0n an aggravating display of smug arrogance, academes began to play the "word game" with oray. 0t apparently was expedient to prove that the device did not really work> .hysicists examined his reports and plans, returning indefinite conclusions. These non5committal verdicts so enraged the patient

oray that he decided to take his material directly to the government institution, which would grant him exclusive manufacturing rights to his designs. 0f no one else was interested in the discovery of the century, then he certainly would undertake the manufacture and distribution of !1%8(@ receivers if need be> The next step was to obtain a patent. 0n 9:;9 he decided to assail the patent office with numerous applications. )asing his patents on several different claims, he had hoped that at least one application would be accepted. True to the formula, each such application was returned without explanation. Each was stamped with the official "8E2E!TE=" seal. &o title, treatment, or adjustment, which he made ever, seemed satisfactory to the .atent 8egistry. (fter this obvious stall action was repeated far too many times to recount, he reached for his last ounce of patience. Trying to take opportunity from the words of those who once sought to diminish his discovery, he inwardly cringed and wrote what he considered his "very last application". 0n this, he cited the operation of the device the result of a "new battery action". 'e thought that, should the patent court officers not officially recogni,e the validity of his past descriptions, they would at least grant patent licensing on this descriptive basis. 'is firm resolve was to stop applying, a costly process, until the obvious shady identities behind the patent rejection process clarified themselves and came forward. 0nterceptions at a high level were preventing the proliferation of his revolutionary technology. 0n fact, coupled with academic cooperation, no journal would ever publish his data. 0n effect, no one would ever hear the very existence of the oray device. 0f possible, no information would ever escape from the inventor*s own immediate neighborhood. 0solating and imprisoning the inventor to small town perimeters became the new regulatory device. The .atent 1fficers rejected his last claim, churning out the response, which he also expected. !learly, there was more behind this merry5go5round behavior than a simple misunderstanding of technical descriptions. 'e was being stalled for very deliberate reasons. There was no hope of making the .atent !ourt accept his findings. 'is was a "no win" situation. Utilities, engineering groups, university personnel, publishers ... far too many agencies had already visited the .atent 1fficers with connections and claims of their own in the matter of =r. oray. Thereafter, he permitted numerous repeat examinations by those who obviously believed him to be a fraud, but eventually lost patience with the skeptics and critics. 'ere was proof of an enormous phenomenon before their very eyes and all their professional expertise could manage was doubt> =r. oray could not waste time with them, moving his research into new avenues and applications. There were many associated phenomena he would discover

while experimenting with the %wedish %tone. )ut social pressures would now seek to divide his time, and far worse.

%1!0(+ !8U!0)+E%
This phenomenal activity eventually attracted the wrong kind of attention. 1f course the radiant energy received by his wonderful mineral was absolutely free, and everywhere plentiful. 0ts industrial proliferation would trigger a revolution in the power and light utilities around the world. This possibility was not the favored topic of discussion among the local boardroom members. =uring the =epression, the 8E( 38ural Electrification (ssociation4 was anxious to "addict" as many isolated rural families as possible to the utilities. $orcing such people to accept the electrical utilities may have been "security" for those whose patronage was buying out the government. =epression was long and hard for all working class (mericans. 0t was difficult to imagine that the upper class was moving into newer investments and higher ideals, while millions of children were starving. Therefore and unfortunately, socialism was the attractive dream of many disgruntled (mericans. 0n those days a seductive utopian dream of economic e#uality, socialism had none of the negative connotations, which are associated with %talin and the !old 7ar. The %oviet Union was simply and naively viewed as a land where workers were all e#ual, moving corporately toward a common ideal. To starving, jobless (mericans who watched the rich driving through town in expensive cars, socialism was the war cry of the times. )ut this, of course, was the "party line" with which socialists drew outsiders in. =aniel and 2ohn agdiel, close friends of =r. oray, had become members of the !ommunist .arty. 'aving gained reputation as (merican !ommunists, they independently decided to "help" =r. oray. .erceiving that their friend was being stalled by the industrialists for good reasons, they decided to take his "cause" to the 8ussian 6overnment directly. 0n 9:BA, =aniel agdiel traveled to 8ussia with this in mind. The naive plan was to interest a nation whose policies on new technology were "unregulated". The story of =r. oray now took an unwilling turn in a direction of political intrigues. (mong the many academes and industrial officials who visited oray, one individual was distinctly not an (merican citi,en. !olonel @akavlev, an official of the !ommunist .arty, was a representative of high esteem in 8ussia. 'e kept his fanatical devotion hidden deep within a smiling exterior, while shopping for new technology.

The (merican 6overnment was so busy eradicating and regulating new technological developments on behalf of its old family patrons, that it did not recogni,e a vulnerability to foreign privateers. The naive academes and industrialists who attended oray*s exhibitions did not restrict !ol. @akavlev, seeing in him no potential future threat. ilitary interests would gradually be attracted, but only after this foreign presence expressed interest in oray. %uperficial liberty is seductive. 1bvious when oray was imprisoned in his own neighborhood by resistive industrialists, the determination to block the 8adiant 8eceiver was a foregone conclusion. The indifference to revolutionary ideas has repeatedly proven deadly. (nd the regulation of revolutionary ideas is deadly. The ideal of a new and better world condition completely escapes the urgent pursuit of governments. 6overnments fre#uently act only on behalf of their controlling patronage, an old and traditional reflex. 0n this instance, the successful military penetration of the national interior by a "vacationing" %oviet !olonel was inadvertently made possible because of economic depression. 'ad (merican investors sei,ed the oray system and implemented it, their fortunes would have been unlimited. 7hat now occurred "looked very bad" for the inventor in the eyes of later investigators" 0n 9:B:, !ol. @akavlev invited him to &ew @ork. There, the two men were to meet with "superiors" at the ( T186 Trading ission. oray found himself, however, in the offices of 6eneral Electric. eetings occurred after work hours in secretive fashion. oray did not like this one bit. 'e left &ew @ork abruptly and returned home. =aniel agdiel contracted with =r. oray to construct a large and completely e#uipped research laboratory in %alt +ake. oray was so pressed for capital to develop his technology that he accepted the grant from the young %oviet Union through his friend =aniel. oray performed research with absolutely no political conse#uences in mind. 'e simply needed the money. =aniel agdie later moved to exico in 9:CB for obvious political reasons. )y 9:;;, foreign nations were not the only ones interested in =r. oray. 6overnment "regulatory commissions" on electrical utility were the very first to plague oray. !ontact between the 8ural Electrification (ssociation and =r. oray began in 9:;:, with the approach of several officials. entioning that =aniel agdiel and the 8E( (dministration were "going to have a meeting", this individual brought several engineers along. %uddenly, interested parties began arriving at oray*s laboratory. The 8E( called in a "scientific expert" who, in a very short span of time, attempted to both destroy the receiver and eradicate oray. 7hile entering his darkened laboratory, oray was actually confronted by gunman. 1ne of this company of assassins was the "scientific expert" sent by

the 8E(. ( scuffle ensuing, guns were fired among both assailants and =r. oray, their intended victim. oray drew his revolver and fired back with unerring accuracy. They never again harassed oray, although a "li#uidation" threat was made by a government agent in the hearing of young 2ohn oray. (gents were continually harassing oray to "come back to the work or face the conse#uences". oray had anticipated death threats, having replaced all the car windows with bulletproof glass. 'e continually carried his own revolver. These more visibly honest expressions of vehemence stand as warnings. Those who will continue imagining that government bureaucracies are legitimately interested in democratic ventures are gravely mistaken idealists. =oubt, anger, and murder. These three proceed from the heart of the fearful, propelling the self5destructive "conspiracy" of human nature away from the ideals. (way from wonder. (way from the lost and glorious world.

%1!0(+ T1U!'
8etrieved patent applications of =r. oray have been closely examined. The examiners rejected claims for the radiant energy receiver despite the working model and the statements of credible witnesses. (pparently there are times when demonstrations and working motors are not "sufficient proof* in the .atent office> The technical basis of rejection was a mere semantic tool used to keep the device out of the industrial complex. Examiners claimed that current could not be developed in his device because it "ran cold". 'ow curious that several crystal radio receivers were given license that year. These sets "ran cold"> Either the examiners are not sufficiently educated or #uite aware of the annual agenda ... as it alternates from year to year. Though oray*s own patent was never granted, it is most curious that another virtually identical application appears in 9:BA. .atent B.<;B.CEC by '.). cElrath antedates that of oray, and is virtually identical to it> !omplete with a working model, this five5stage amplifier utili,es special radioactive minerals to operate phonographs, public address systems, as well as radio5television receivers. 1utput volume is strong. The device can amplify radio and phonograph signals without the application of external energy, and re#uires no tube replacements. There are several other examples of these patents, which have been retrieved, the cElrath system not being the only one to emerge during that time period. %everal inventors 3)lackmore, 'ubbard, 7inkelman, (insworth, )urke, $arnsworth, 'art4 developed remarkable energy amplifiers and electrical sources, which implemented small amounts of, unrefined radioactive

materials. 7hat is more remarkable is the cavalier manner in which the cElrath patent and others, though licensed, never reached the consumer market. &one of these patented devices were ever mass5produced. (fter studying sufficient numbers of such patents, one reali,es that corporate connected regulators and examiners established an active search for all emerging energy devices. (ll patents having to do with free energy are purposefully blocked from reaching social scales of proliferation, as is evidenced by the great number of patents which never reached the market place. (ll we have are the official documents, proof that the designs both really existed and that they were successfully operated as described. !ertain principle authorities of the University were given a folio of drawings and notes by =r. oray in confidence. The drawings surfaced years later, when )ell +aboratories patented their "transistor". The very same designs. Transistor development was the direct outgrowth of oray*s research, being directly derived from his own early models. 0mprobable" The attorney in charge of )ell +aboratory transistor patents was the very same person who handled the oray patents. =r. oray maintained his own research laboratory throughout these years, working as a consultant for the radio industry. /arious radio companies employed his expertise in the design and manufacture of superior vacuum tube receivers. The golden age of radio saw notable developments in circuit design by oray. 7orking for E.'. %cott 8adio +abs, he pioneered the development of their famed ".hilharmonic", "0mperial", and "+%)" receivers. These chrome5plated grand consoles produced an uncharacteristic "velvety warm" ( and %hort5wave reception which sounded like . . The notably unusual oray radio circuits made possible the reception of small stations as far away as (ntarctica> 1n one occasion witnesses clearly heard (dmiral )yrd broadcasting from "+ittle (merica". !ompany brochures and journals show oray and E.'. %cott in %cott*s industrial radio laboratory. +ater speciali,ing in the design of efficient vacuum tubes and vacuum tube circuitry, it was not difficult for =r. oray to find numerous such consulting positions. 7hen oray went to work for 'ammerlund 0ndustries, he developed their "%uper5.ro" series. The clarity achieved in these designs was reminiscent of sounds heard through crystal radio receivers. Employing principles learned through his work with the %wedish %tone, he designed true cold cathode tubes. 0n these, radioactive materials were used in place of thermionic cathode emitters. (pplications of these tubes for continuous high5output operation were employed in military designs. =r. .hilo T. $arnsworth independently developed numerous such radioactive cathode tubes during the same time frame. 'is cesium coated "multipactor" design is a

pure photonuclear reactor whose anomalous outputs baffled radio engineers of the day. =r. oray*s talents were admired and sought by numerous radio companies. 'e helped the $isher 8adio !ompany by designing the famous $isher odel %1 stereo amplifier. (ll of these designs built by =r. oray had characteristic coil structures in which signals were very efficiently built up to maximum volumes through successive stages, a development learned through working with his radiant receiver. (mong fellow engineers and technicians he managed to find several warmhearted persons who perceived genius in this gentle man. 6aining their confidence, he invariably discussed his notions of the "sea of energy", always arousing intense excitement. &o one doubted his words or his claims. &o one #ualified his statements. 'e was respected by all with whom he came in contact. $riends were completely convinced of his claims. Their friend and colleague had a world5revolutionary discovery, a discovery that would change society completely. 7hereas professorial concerns balanced empirical fact against dogma and patronage, =r. oray found opened minds in the nation*s industrial workshops. This was his first best clue about truly influencing the scientific community. Thereafter, his approach maintained this personal touch. &umerous lectures were given concerning radiant energy and the possibilities of employing radiant energy principles. &o doubt =r. .hilo $arnsworth, a young man living in %alt +ake !ity at the time, read of these early talks. )oth men independently pursued similar inspirations.

$UTU8E TE!'&1+16@
)esides the principle radiant device, his power receiver, =r. oray demonstrated several different wonders over a period of many years for countless witnesses. /isions of the future, several thousand persons witnessed these remarkable technologies, whether during birthdays, barbecues, prayer meetings, or formal and informal lectures. 'osts of neighbors, relatives, friends, and guests each beheld the full range of his liberal hospitality in these regards. =r. oray never stopped discovering the remarkable new properties of the %wedish %tone. 'e generali,ed the principles learned from +e )on*s original thesis, developing revolutionary applications of photonuclear reactions in other materials and chemical compositions. Three distinctly different applications of the general principle were produced over the years following his original discoveries.

The first of these was an accidental effect, found during his experiments with the radiant receiver. This strange discovery manifested while attempting to "tune" the %tone with an early5grounded radio receiver. 'e found to his very great ama,ement that he was tuning, not radio stations, but local neighborhoods> 'eadphones attached to the device produced a world of local sounds where no microphones were present. The sounds he heard were human conversations and common workday sounds. Tuning into these eerie vocali,ations, he eventually traveled to the very spots and identified the very voices and sounds heard from so very far away. The device was no microphone. %ealed in a bell jar, its connections were solidly drawn under the bell to outside headphones and ground. Tuning mechanisms were all housed below the thick glass tank. 0t has been reported that this function would only work when the oray "tube" was pointed at the ground. %everal photographs show this mysterious "secret listening device" or "sound pickup device". =r. oray displayed the listening device for family, students, engineers, and friends alike. Each was able, with unerring precision, to locate the neighborhood spots into which the device had penetrated. 0t was imagined that this device received sonic vibrations in the radiant envelope just at ground level. Tuning with the device permitted a strange "lateral ground sweep" of this envelope. 0n one demonstration, two headphones were connected to the device. 1nce tuned, =r. oray handed the headphones to two different persons. Three others were asked to go out in front of the house and carryon a conversation. =r. oray said that they would be tuned to the three individuals. Upon listening at the headphones, the conversation was distinctly heard. Each listener could clearly distinguish who was speaking. 0n addition, the sound of rain falling on the pavement was also clearly heard. =uring this demonstration, one of those listening decided to "tune in" for himself. 1ne turn on the sweep knob, and the ama,ed younger listener began to hear other conversations and sounds. 'e later wrote that he distinctly heard the whistle of a train, the voice of a stationmaster calling out "all aboard", and other simultaneous conversations. 'e identified the sounds coming from the local railroad station ... more than five miles distance from the tuning site. =uring this entire demonstration no one carried an external transmitter. The doubters were all put to silence when the young man mentioned what he heard from the railroad station. &o one at the railroad station was carrying any kind of transmitter. %weeps could be made of the entire surrounding area by turning the dial. 'ow this is possible challenged the very heart of electrical science. Iuestions concerning the basic notions of earth energy were asked.

'ow were these distant living sounds being derived from a ground wire" =id the sounds associated with human activity somehow have a "biological" effect on the radiant energy environment" 6overnment agencies were most interested in these devices. @ears after his unfortunate experience with the 8E(, =r. oray took the listening device with him to $ort onmouth 3&ew 2ersey4 8adio %ignal labs in 9:C<, where he developed the system in a top secret government research project. 'e rarely mentioned the device again. ( second most ama,ing area of discovery, which =r. oray engaged, concerned therapeutic ray5devices. (fter working with his radiant energy receiver =r. oray began noticing radium5like burns on his hands. 0n an effort to cure his own problems, he delved into the mysterious surrounding biological healing. 8adio fre#uency stimulation of the body was often used to speed healing process. )roken bones evidenced a rapid repair time when exposed to certain radio impulses. !uts, bruises, and some burns were also healed by the use of specific radio impulses. =r. oray then studied the use of various radiant therapies, with particular regard for radium and cobalt therapies. 'e determined that, while each of these methods had their specific effect and use, a more penetrating radiation would outperform all of these systems. 'e began experimenting with systems of his own, developing several remarkable tubes for the projection of rays. =uring the research he had found that certain ray energies could enhance tissue repairs without harming the body. 'e now applied the theory of +e )on, intent on producing novel and unknown rays through photo nuclear reactions. 'e arranged specific elements and radioactive composites in low5pressure gaseous tubes. The idea was to stimulate a near aetheric disintegration of matter, releasing deeply penetrating radiance, which was far less energetic than gamma rays. &ear light like emissions was his goal. Tesla generated these in high vacuum tubes with carborundum buttons. The light from Tesla*s tubes provoked physiological stimulations of a healing variety. (fter a thorough series of experiments, he wrote several articles on the subject. 0n his short treatise on "(lpha, )eta, and 6amma 8ay Therapy" he wroteD ")ecause the fundamental radioactive process does not originate in the electronic structure ... on the surface of the atom ... but in the center of the atom, deep therapy is possible over a long time period...". =r. oray developed and used his special "ray applicators" with the deepest conviction that their penetrating powers would render therapy without damage, himself having been the living proof. The theory behind his devices was profound. +earning the radiance emitted by tissues during self5repair, he could apply the same radiance artificially to stimulate repair. +ight5like penetrations could stimulate deep tissue healing with specific precision if made gentle enough.

"These rays will penetrate one half inch thickness of lead ... and yet they will not injure healthy tissues because of the internal "phantom" characteristics ... and the nature of the active material used...". These mystifying statements indicate the revolutionary nature of the oray therapeutic devices, large bell5shaped tubes and blown glass containers 3patent B EA<.F<F4. !areful study of this design reveals four distinct ray tube forms and several possible variations of each. 'is therapeutic ray tubes utili,ed a variety of gases and radioactive materials in judicious proportions and combinations. 7ith these devices and others like them, =r. oray now freely investigated the strange world of gamma and "(ether ray" energies. Taught in science classes as deadly, oray found out that gamma rays could neutrali,e the radioactivity of natural ores and perform other wonders. 8emarkably, these patents were granted. There are those who yet declare that =r. oray revealed the secret of his radiant detector in this patent. (ccording to reputation, exposure to radiant output from these oray ray tubes was non5ha,ardous and "thrilling". %ome of these devices employed windows of #uart, or of ruby glass to project the rays. 1utput from these large bell jar tubes is body5permeating, made to invigorate the entire being. Their stimulating and refreshing influence reportedly produced an invigorating response similar to intravenous injections of vitamins 3)earden4. The @(81 tube 3" oray" backwards4, is a blown glass device which is not unlike a cylindrical Jworykin iconoscope tube 3+ehr4. Electrically activated by BC< -ilovolt impulses, electronic currents are directed toward a strangely configured multi5staged target of unknown compositions. 7hen operating, the device releases a soft, healing pink light. This permeating light appears within tube, easily traveling through the blown #uart, walls to the outside air. 'ands can block the light, but longer exposures prove their permeating effects. oray claimed that these rays originated deep within atomic nuclei. Exposing various materials to the output of this comparatively small ray5tube, =r. oray found it possible to stimulate the growth of crystals and metals. The divided gold content of mining soils were actually made to "grow" by exposing them to specific gamma rays. This led to other more dramatic research objectives, his third revolutionary development.

E&E86@ 0&T1

(TTE8

)y 9:A9, =r. oray was describing a means by which received radiant energy could be "directed anywhere", an obvious reference to a new development.

This would have coupled his radiant energy receiver with the ray tube applicators. 'is principle forte being metallurgy, =r. oray applied his knowledge to various related fields of study? crystallography, metallurgy, and radiant energy. !omprehending these principles very thoroughly now, he was able to "design" crystalline and metallic compositions whose response to radiant energies, whether natural or manmade, would produce specific radiant products, whether special rays or particles. 0n addition to the use of crystalline materials in absorbing radiant energy, =r. oray explored the possibilities of converting rays directly into matter. 'is experiments in these regards received notice when, in 9:AC, he addressed the AKth national ining !onference in =enver on the subject of transmutation. 1riginally begun in 9:EC as a method for raising the yields of soils taken from gold mines, =r. oray rented and employed a linear accelerator at high personal cost. The accelerator, rented from /(80(& associates, obtained very specific energetic electrons for his process. Exposing various materials to the output of this particle accelerator, =r. oray found it possible to stimulate the growth of crystals and metals in these tailings by special treatments. This process closely followed his work on tissue curative rays, an obviously analogous theoretical development. 2ohn oray*s statement went as followsD "... the process we have described is in reality a crystal growing bath, activated by irradiation. (s the gold atoms come into being by transmutation, they become* gregarious*, resulting in the crystal formation. $rom this observation there is every reason to suspect that low5grade ores and mine tailings provide, not only seed for crystal growth, but also a nuclear environment which is well advanced, or uni#uely favorable for the formation of the precious metals by ... transmutation...". 0n a rare and amusing episode, =r. oray found that the scant precious metal content of mining soils were actually made to "grow" by exposure to specific electron energies. 6old, silver, and platinum micro5crystals were found throughout these "tailings", but in widely scattered "seeds". These rays experimentally demonstrated ability to cause the "organic" growth of tiny gold crystals scattered throughout these soils. .rocesses developed by =r. oray included mixing the tailings in numerous chemical baths. 'is numerous references to the "reagent" and the "environment" indicate that these "catalysts" were the most important feature of his process. The lumpy clay like slurry was poured into large disc5shaped molds of varying depth. These were exposed to electron bombardment on a conveyer belt system made entirely of wood and resins. There were significant "interferences"

whenever plastic or metal 3especially copper4 was employed in the ray chamber. Early experiments re#uired the "aging" of slurry mixtures, an essential feature of the process. +ater statements indicated a new success. 7ith special improvements in catalytic solutions, oray found it possible to mix the slurries and expose them directly to the rays without "aging" them. 'e mentioned that the cost of these solutions was not more than fifty dollars per one hundred gallons. 6old obtained from this K million electron volt +0&(! system was efficiently produced. )ut oray wished to boost this efficiency beyond all expectations. 'e therefore began to study transmutative reactions within the slurry with greater attention. 7hen it was found that particle bombardments were often not consistently flowing through the samples, oray designed a special "resonant chamber". This "undulated" with the incoming blasts, producing incredibly high yields. 'e measured their ability to transmute in terms of cost. Total yield versus total cost. 0n tailings, which initially assayed at <.9K ounces (u per ton, the resulting yields were often as high as 9<< ounces of gold and BBC ounces of silver> oray estimated from his results that increased gold percentages ranged between 9<F and ;B: percents> 1nce exposed to these electron blasts, the mildly radioactive buttons necessarily had to "cool down". These buttons were then treated with gamma rays. This "treatment" rendered them "neutral", oray having discovered how to denature radioactive matter. These de5 natured ore samples were sent to assay offices and analy,ed. Their yields confirmed by chemists, oray proceeded with the manufacture of gold for a time. 'e then turned his attention on the possibility of raising the levels of weak uranium deposits by his method. The results of these experiments were classified. 0t is said that he later designed a small system of his own for the production of gamma rays in prolific #uantities. =esigned and operated along parameters, which embodied his rare knowledge of rays and metals, these were implemented in the gold5growing process with greater success. The use of gamma ray fluxes greatly outdid the performance of cumbersome +0&(! devices, which were more costly to operate and maintain. =r. oray employed radiant bombardment in a special element transmuting process of his own design. 'e produced coppers and leads having astounding refractory #ualities. 0mpossible to melt below two thousand degrees $ahrenheit, the lead was the wonder of every metallurgist who received his samples. 'is coppers were so strong and heat resistant that he employed them as bearings in his high5 speed motors. (n undisclosed alloy, made by the oray process, could

withstand twelve thousand degrees $ahrenheit without melting. 7 developed extraordinary metals and alloys.

@%TE8@

0&E8(+

=r. oray continued researching phenomena which the %wedish %tone produced, but recogni,ed that he would eventually "run short", having used so much of it in his past experiments. ultiple staging in his last few designs re#uired much of the material. 8eali,ing that his progress toward industrial aims would rely on the artificial synthesis of the mineral, he therefore subjected the %wedish %tone to a complete microanalytical profile. =r. oray considered that, perhaps only specific chemical parts of the mineral were the real "active" components. 0n addition, perhaps also there were also components, which actually limited or "blocked" the photo5reactivity. ( synthesi,ed compound would eliminate the blocks and maximi,e the activators. $ar more power would then be received and converted to usable energy. &ominal si,ed !1%8(@ receivers could theoretically produce giga5 watts of electrical energy. $or a moment he considered that, perhaps nature had achieved what could not be humanly achieved. 0n this case, he knew where to obtain the mystery mineral again in large #uantities. 'imself an excellent metallurgist, he eventually succeeded in synthesi,ing his rare material in a laboratory furnace. oray mentions that it was only after synthesi,ing the material that he reali,ed the rarity of his original find. 7e do not know if =r. oray improved the material beyond the %wedish %tone composition. 7hat we yet know of this synthesi,ed material is that its primary ingredient is ultra5pure 6ermanium. =r. oray constantly complained to chemical supply houses that their 6ermanium was "not pure enough". 6ermanium is derived from euxenite, argyrodite, and germanite. 1f the three, euxenite contains radioactive elements and several rare earths. Euxenite decomposes into L@ Er !e Ti &b $e U <M, (rgyrodite into L(g % 6eM, and germanite into L!u 6e 6aM. =r. oray determined a small radioactive content in the %wedish %tone 3+ehr4. The various "doping" materials in his synthetic mixture include ,inc sulphide, iron sulfide, bismuth, and three other secret elements in "combination". These latter chemicals were never known by outsiders, but have been revealed as a combination of thorium, caesium, and radium sulphide. !areful analysis of these materials, with sensitive attention to their combined functions, was achieved several years ago by an extraordinary electrical

engineer and visionary 37. +ehr4. 'is conclusion is that the oray component is a photobiased diode, which is sensitive to a specific resonant series of signals. )eginning with the H5band, and increasing through to the gamma ray series, the oray device is a high fre#uency band5passing gate. ( non5 rectifying diode. The system responds to specific incoming signals as well as those, which are "transduced" through the radioactive materials, which are included in the mixture. 0t has been hypothesi,ed that the %wedish %tone was rare variety of the mineral %podumene. %podumene grows in gigantic crystals, some of these measuring in excess of forty feet in certain locales. )rilliant pink or white, its crystalline surface is smooth. 7hen fractured or crushed, it becomes a smooth silvery white material. +arge %podumene deposits are found in %weden. %podumene decomposes into L+i &a (l %i <M.

%podumene 7hether his %podumene sample contained 6ermanium, we will never know. .erhaps his knowledge of the +e )on photoreactions permitted the design of a distinctly new radiant5receptive mixture. 0t is not generally known what, in fact, is being done with the material and the detector. %ome have suggested that =r. oray may have destroyed the essential parts of the device. Those who worked with =r. oray attest to the absolute validity of his claims. Each witnessed the operation of the radiant energy receiver. Each comprehended somewhat of its essential secrets. Each attempted in some small manner to duplicate these findings. Each subse#uently developed certain designs, which demonstrated varying degrees of success in releasing anomalous outputs of electrical energy.

oray /alve True to the archetype of discovery, this is not the only time such a mineral has appeared during this latter part of our century. 0n another rare documented instance of hapha,ard discovery, (rthur +. (dams, a retired electronics engineer, claimed to have discovered a smooth silvery gray "electroradiant" mineral in 7ales during the 9:C<*s. 'e found the mineral with a device of his own design. 7hen fine wire contacts touch the mineral surface, high voltages are produced. They are strong enough to constantly sustain a si,eable current in an external load. This mineral 3(damsite4 produced prodigious amounts of electrical power in proper circuit configurations. 7hen sliced into thin layers and stacked among metallic contacts, the power output is greatly magnified. 7hen dipped into water, the output increases. 7hen the stone is then removed, the water retains an ability to produce electrical power for hours. )ritish authorities managed to sei,e the material and all the inventor*s research papers, claiming to be studying the material for "future social distribution". 7e are not likely to see this mineral from the )ritish 6overnment 3or any other government4 until a social change is demanded.

1ther energy5receptive devices, which use electroradiant minerals, have appeared this century. =evices built by several different inventors supplied enough power to light their own homes for years after disconnection from the power utilities 3(mman, olinet4. The device by (mman 39:;<*s4 used special "chemicals and minerals" in conjunction with electrical capacitors. 7ith this device it was possible to operate an entire household worth of electrical appliances. ( subse#uent development proved that the device could power an electric car indefinitely. ore recently, an ama,ing example of this technology has been produced by 6ene olinet in 9:KB. 'is development was the result of an astounding observation made while repairing an airplane radio. 8emoving a crystal component, r. olinet received a heavy shock. 'e then undertook a complete study of crystals and magnetic fields. 'is device was observed by an electrical engineer who reports that it somehow utili,ed 6alena and magnets in specific spatial relationships, re#uiring a firm ground connection for its successful operation.

E&=+E%% +06'T%
&umerous voices throughout the years have expressed desire to reproduce the effects obtained by =r. oray. (ll are after the missing "%tone"> This is certainly one of the most tantali,ing mysteries in the annals of lost science. any opinions have been tenaciously held by researchers concerning the means which =r. oray employed in his !1% 8(@ receiver. 7e also find a great many theoretical propositions and e#ually as many technical approaches in this #uest. There are indeed several major problems, which face those who wish to probe the oray mystery. There are also several related discoveries of importance help in clarifying our perspectives in these regards. 0n addition, there have been a significant group of researchers whose work, in combination, reveals the most probable explanations for =r. oray*s remarkable achievement in radiant energy reception. The logic trail shifts with the findings and moves with the conclusions. )ut the rewards for society are great, provided one can match an empirical demonstration with the theory. (bove all things, we must not imitate those whose fixation on textbook5approved conventions lead into blind alleys. )uilding and toppling our house of cards is not frustrating for those who thrill to this #uest. 0t is imperative that, when academic conventions fail to supply ade#uate conclusions, one must actively exercise human meta5cognition over statistics.

The prerogative to choose alternative possibilities. To look outside "the facts", and look around "the barriers" of dogma. Therefore this short section will serve to air some of the many ideas historically offered in explanation of the !1%8(@ detector. The goal, we remember, is reproducing his results. The reward is benefiting humanity with an energy revolution. 0n the absence of hard empirical data, the search for the oray detector is very much a process of eliminations> 7hen considering the available radiant energy of the natural environment, one is faced with remarkable contradictions. These contradictions, however, may not invalidate the obvious demonstrations, which =r. oray engaged. 8esearchers have studied a short5 wave radio phenomenon known as "bursters" and "drifters". The "bursters" come as short but transcendently powerful electrical signals. 8adio "bursters" remain in one fre#uency, pouring all of their power into the receivers which entune them. They seem to "stand in place" in a columnar manner, growing in strength with increased time. 7hen once entuned, the small input seems to attract all the available incoming energies until the receiver can no longer handle the power. )ursters destroy receivers and perform other strange electrical feats. "8adio5drifters" are related to bursters, differing only in their fre#uency "drifting" nature. 1ne investigator has judged the actual energy content of radio5drifters as exceeding a megawatt 3=. 7inter4. Evidence of staggering incoming power, the energy of the drifter is difficult to explain with conventional theory. 8ecall that =r. oray first became aware of the power potential in space energies while employed by the Telegraph and Telephone !ompany. 'is extensive preoccupation with the "ocean like surges", heard through the long lines in headphones, prompted all of his successful research. There are those who therefore believe that =r. oray was tapping the energy of the potent auroral electrojets, which constantly surge in the ionosphere above us. They therefore do not cite cosmic rays or any such radiant sources in explaining what =r. oray "realistically achieved". These researchers believe that his discovery of the %tone provided a material, a semi5conductor, capable of very high fre#uency avalanche conduction. The very high voltages, instantaneously released in substantial capacitances such as telephone lines, were capable of flowing through an external circuit to power several appliances. 0n essence, they believe that the %tone permitted the construction of a high fre#uency diode having solid5state negative resistance 3+ehr4. 0t is a common observation that certain impulse energies cannot "pass" through silicon diodes, while effortlessly finding conductive passage through 6ermanium diodes. 'is employment of the early aerial and ground elements provided the capacitance through which the electrostatic energy was absorbed. 0t was

probable that =r. oray further enhanced the threshold conductivity of 6ermanium with special radioactive additives so that it would respond with both speed and increasing saturation to the mounting electrostatic energies. .rimarily developed in the large capacitance of his ground connection, these energies passed unnoticed by most experimenters. 7hat was needed to tap this tremendous energy reservoir was a "low threshold switch". Therefore, the examination of the oray device proceeds as a study of conduction bands and #uantum potential energies in crystals. %ome writers proposed that oray had developed a "cosmic ray diode". 0n this model, the oray receiver is treated as a transducer in which cosmic rays drive electron currents. The special material is the ray sensitive material in which this conversion process supposedly occurs. 0f we use the available potential energy of a single cosmic ray, we find that it could raise only one ten5thousandth of a watt*s worth of electrical energy. 0f cosmic rays were intercepted by the pellet, producing extensive photonuclear cascades, then why was the ground connection needed at all" (ccording to the calculated values, a detector the volume of that used by oray could never intercept enough cosmic rays to achieve the demonstrated outputs. The stone pellet itself did not offer sufficient interceptive cross section to be the whole generative center of oray*s device. !learly the stone pellet was part of a much larger "organi,ed activity" involving the ground. There is an alternative model, which focuses attention on the necessity for ground connection in the device. 7hile aerials could be eliminated from his apparatus, it was not so with the ground connection. 1ne recalls that =r. oray was never able to do without the ground connection. (lso the successful operation of the device re#uired a "tuning" procedure. 7hat was he tuning"" )oth good ground connection and sensitive tunings were indispensable for obtaining the enormous energies demonstrated in his !1%8(@ detector. The volume of cosmic rays intercepted by a volume of ground is vast. 6round entrant cosmic rays would stimulate the activation of vast free electrical volumes. (ny section of ground would effectively become an available "interception plate" of vast si,e. These free charges would "leak up" into any radio ground connection, producing significant and conspicuous "static" power when tuned to certain fre#uencies. "Tuning into" these radio bands, the ground "interception plate" would pour its vast electrical surpluses into any detector, producing lightning like discharges. This model sounds plausible, but why would the %wedish %tone be the necessary item then" 7hy would not any radio receiver locate these fre#uency bands" The infre#uent observation of "bursters" lends this objection some credence. !ould bursters simply be a rare "radio detectable" solar

emission, one in which electrical impulse are surging at lower fre#uency" The pulse which oray was able to constantly receive might then have been occurring in the microwave band 3+ehr4. This model might lead in the right direction provided we shifted our attentions to an alternate kind of energetic spectrum. 0f ground entrant cosmic rays produced a special and distinct subatomic "vibration" in the ground, one which could not be entuned with ordinary radio receivers, then the mildly radioactive %wedish %tone acts as a special kind of receiver ... both tuning and receiving ground5wide "radioactive impulses". %uch "radioactive waves" would appear as a "white noise" in a grounded radioactive detector. %pecially tuned settings would release the energy into the receiver. 7e might liken the process to rain falling on the surface of a lake. (s the rain comes in sheets and gusts, the lake surface becomes "rimpled" with the disturbance. Tuning into this violent surface of energy would be e#uivalent to using a straw in order to obtain a coherent flow. 6etting a gush of water from such an incoherent vibrance is nearly impossible. ( wider "pipe" would not enable a greater extraction of energy. oray did not rely on ever5larger cross5section ground connections. This would be the re#uirement if we were utili,ing radioactive white noise. 0f such a draft of energy were coming through the fine wire contacts on the pellet, the delicate connections would burn away before any energy could ever be extracted. 7hen considering "ground secondary radiations", one would have to account for the "reflective surface" within the ground capable of absorbing the cosmic rays and "vibrating". 7hat would be the exact nature of the "absorbent" ground medium" 7ould it be free electrons" 0s there a possibility that the actual medium of absorption was something more exotic than electrons ... some subatomic particle sea of which we are yet unaware" The entire notion of cosmic ray absorption re#uires the ability of a fluidic medium to absorb the projectile energy of entrant cosmic rays. 0f the fluid were "free electrons", then the cosmic rays would pierce it like bullets fired into water. The resultant energetic violence would produce no coherent pattern, only a "frothy electrostatic disturbance". ( slim possibility might exist for entuning the major "harmonics" of such a frothy white noise, obtaining an electrical output. )ut the incoherence of all resultant "white noise" energy is still the reasonable objection to this otherwise good model. The "ground plate" theory might more reasonably apply in this instance. 7here individual entrant cosmic rays might affect only white noise disturbances in either an electron sea or exotic subatomic sea, sudden gusts would suddenly "deform" a large ground region of the absorbent medium. The resultant whole regional deformation and recovery would represent a coherent energetic impulse of great power. These gusts could be entuned, the short

and unexpected impulses being maximi,ed in the proper circuitry. This is exactly what =r. oray described. The sudden gust may produce a powerful electrostatic potential, which appears above the normal background of white noise as "oceanic waves". $urthermore, if the sudden burst energy is electrostatic in nature 3received into a terrestrial electrical "tank"4, it is certainly received as a singular impulse with a very rapid decay among progressively lower harmonics. 0n this latter case, the gust impulse would enter the white noise sea, being lost in the incoherence. 0n addition, we do know that conventional cosmic rays evidence abrupt showers when measured across a broad ground region. 8are interstellar cosmic rays, mostly nuclear fragments from stars, manifest in "showers". )ut these do not coincide with the periodicity re#uired for the oray effect. %olar flare activity would account for a far greater energetic flux, manifesting the "bursts" and "impulse waves" which =r. oray observed. 7e must also remember that, both Tesla and +e )on considered natural radioactivity as the sign of "true cosmic rays". 7hat conventionalists measure and call cosmic rays do not explain the constancy of radioactivity, and cannot be that of manifestation to which they referred. 0f solar cosmic ray showers were not a steadily observed event, then oray*s "cosmic rays" are not conventional. 0f that is so, then we must determine the nature of both entrant showers and absorbent media. 0f the earth "energy absorber" proves to be another energy stratum, like the aether of early /ictorian physics, then we must discuss how such a fluidic energy can be conducted into the metal wires of oray*s device. (nd what if the oray energy receiver is not be responding to "conventional" cosmic rays at all" To what then did oray refer when speaking of "cosmic" and "radioactive waves"" There are those researchers who believe that oray "cosmic rays" or oray "gamma rays" may be completely different entities than those, which academes identify. =r. oray believed that it was "neutron bombardment" which were responsible for the powerful electrostatic emissions coming forth from his mineral. 1ne may then consider that oray agreed with Tesla when speaking of cosmic rays. To be specific, the Teslian definition of cosmic rays had nothing to do with those, which are conventionally described or studied by astrophysicists, being "light5like effluves". Tesla said they were not easily detected. 0f proper detection of these effluves re#uires radioactive materials, then the most noteworthy work toward this achieving this goal was performed in special galena radio detection circuits by =aniel 7inter. (ccording to the theories of Tesla and +e )on, radioactive materials are the dense targets of external energetic streams. These streams were said by

oray to come in sudden "gusts". r. 7inter proved this principle. 6alena crystals were touched with carnotite5tipped cat5whiskers. 8emarkable electrostatic "spikes" appeared when sensitive spots were touched, the magnitude of which was almost impossible to measure. The device was receiving an anomalous vast energy, which came in sudden bursts. !oupling two such detectors across a space of several feet, it was possible to show a phase5heterodyned signal, which existed as a tension between the two receivers. 0n other words, the lagging response between each carnotitegalena detector showed that "radioactive" waves were traveling across space. oreover, these waves were of small impulse lengths, seeing that they could be heterodyned across such a short detection space. The waves were those, which "caused" the radioactivity of the carnotite samples. Energy bursts appeared when the waves surged. That they were traveling was revealed through the phase5lag between each receiver. %uch phase lag in radioactive materials can be easily see through careful darkroom examination of radium dial clock faces. aintaining the dial in a constant dark condition for days permits a most ama,ing observation. 7hat is seen supports the theory of +e )on. 8adioactive luminescence very obviously "flimmers" from edge to edge in endless processions, as if induced from the outside. 1ne uses this phenomenon as a visual detector of these external radio5 inductive waves, observing sudden soft gusts of light, which often spread through and across the luminescent matter. This wavelike luminous manifestation was the phenomenon, which /ictorians marveled over in a device known as the "sphinthariscope". The flimmering waves reveal a specific band of external energetic induction, the true cause of radioactivity according to +e )on. %mall radioactive additions to appropriate conductive materials might produce the re#uisite detector of Teslian cosmic rays. There are those who reduce oray*s detector to an "atomic battery" 3.. )rown4. /ictor 'art, a researcher who once worked with =r. oray, developed a special tube of his own. 7itnessed by several credible witnesses, this tube resembles a $arnsworth ultipactor 3)rown, +indemann, 8edfern4. !athodes are housed at opposed ends of the tube, the anode being a screen at the tube midpoint. The vessel is filled with helium and argon gases at low pressure. The target anode is a brass screen coated with a carnotite mixture 3probably with caesium4. (ctivated by a four thousand volt discharge, the tube springs to life. Electrical meters, which are, attached to the device "go off scale" with the increased output, the tube emitting thunderous sounds and a blinding white light. 0n addition, there is a radiant flux, which drives distantly placed 6eiger counters off5scale. The device is clearly an energy amplifier, taking electrical power at

one volume and magnifying it. The agency of this transformation is, very obviously, the natural radioactive material used in the target. .erhaps the ground surges were not "radioactive" in nature at all. )oth the use of an ordinary ground connector and the simple tuning mechanism indicates a radionic activity. 0n fact, this is the most satisfying model to date. 0t organi,es all the divergent aspects of the oray receiver #uite effortlessly. 0t does re#uire a new perspective however. The %wedish %tone might have served as a conductor and magnifier of 1d. %uch 1d radiance could never stimulate electrical charges for )aron von 8eichenbach. .erhaps =r. oray had found one of those "mineral gates" where this did occur. 0t may have been in the nature of the mineral itself to effect conversions of 1d into electrostatic currents. 0n citing this possibility we encourage the re5reading of the 8eichenbach biography and consider his science of 8adionics. 8emember, though oray was able to replace the aerial with a copper plate, =r. oray was never able to eliminate the ground system entirely. The absolute need for the tuning device indicates a necessary radionic tuning component. 7ith the detector in firm ground connection, the mineral became 1d radiant. 1d currents grow in time, saturating and magnifying in ground lines of any small cross section. 1d discharges across space, producing black radiant auras and smokey white photographic traces when arcing into nearby people. The radionic model effectively unifies all the aspects of the oray receiver, and keeps with the essential simplicity of his descriptions. 1btaining that "magical mineral" remains the last key to the process>

$6 Wo1: on &i0e
7ast updated !#/4/#$

2n Dngoing Iesearch 3roject

3age ! of /

)pecial than-s to .eff Iense for ma-ing .ohn's interview on the )eptember $& /##$ with .eff Iense available here.

< 2* 2 I+)+2IM> +,G<,++I& ,DT 2 *+F<M27 FDMTDI& 2,F T>+I+(DI+ FD ,DT *2 + 2,J *+F<M27 M72<*) (DI T><) T+M>,D7DGJ.
*y wor- on Iife's fre1uencies involves the use of electronic interferometry and gating of 3F signals00 not -nown at this time in the Iife field. < designed the gated interferometer for my crystal0controlled amplifier oscillator. This is not 'pseudo' electronics. < hold all rights to this process. Helow are pictures of some of the special functions that can be done. *y wor- in the beginning involved wor-ing with .ohn Mrane and Fr. )trec-er in the reconstruction of the virus R3 'Qniversal' microscope in the early %#'s to develop pumped wave fre1uency generators and 40wave mi8ing. < had this microscope until Harry 7ynes had it pic-ed up by court order from Mrane because .ohn Mrane had sold it many times before. 2ll the parts were there00the parts that were missing Mrane and < made& and .ohn Mrane too- them with him when he left. ?hat he did with them remains un-nown to this day. The microscope was ta-en and never to be seen again. The only thing left is pictures and no wor-ing microscope. .ohn Mrane also had special gas filled Iife tubes whose whereabouts are also un-nown. <f you do not understand interferometry& it is basically the same system used in some laser systems to produce holograms and spectrum analysis. <'m only dealing with generating harmonics and sub0 harmonics for research only. . Iife's microscope may have wor-ed on the principles using interferometry and this could be why& to this day& the microscope is not understood. There were many lenses missing and prisms that Mrane and < were building before the microscope was pic-ed up by court order.

<nterferometer *i8 Hefore Transmitter

*i8ing Two (re1uencies at Dne Time

40?ave *i8ing

*i8ing Two (undamentals <nside +ach ?ave

3ictures of the wave before it enters the interferometer. Top left is the the interferometer at the gateN then everything else loo-s normal after combining with carrier wave.

3ump ?ave *i8 of (our )ignals *odulated

<nterferometer )ignal to Mrystal Dscillator 2mplifier

Qsing the <nterferometer To 2djust a !.$### *>; crystal to !.5$!/# *>;

The Gate fre1uency of .3 The Gate fre1uency of 6 >; The Gate fre1uency of .! >; is triggering the is triggering the >; is triggering the interferometer to ma-e the interferometer to ma-e the interferometer to ma-e the changes in fre1uency in the changes in fre1uency in the changes in fre1uency in the !.$#4*h; wave. !.$#4*h; wave. !.$#4*h; wave.

The Gate fre1uency of !6 The Gate fre1uency of // The Gate fre1uency of 33 >; >; is triggering the >; is triggering the is triggering the interferometer to ma-e the interferometer to ma-e the interferometer to ma-e the changes in fre1uency in the changes in fre1uency in the changes in fre1uency in the !.$#4*h; wave. !.$#4*h; wave. !.$#4*h; wave.

The Gate fre1uency of $4 The Gate fre1uency of !4/ The Gate fre1uency of 6!% >; is triggering the >; is triggering the >; is triggering the interferometer to ma-e the interferometer to ma-e the interferometer to ma-e the changes in fre1uency in the changes in fre1uency in the changes in fre1uency in the !.$#4*h; wave. !.$#4*h; wave. !.$#4*h; wave.

The Gate fre1uency of The Gate fre1uency of The Gate fre1uency of /.%$$ !.#3! ->; is triggering the !.6/4 ->; is triggering the ->; is triggering the interferometer to ma-e the interferometer to ma-e the interferometer to ma-e the

changes in fre1uency in the changes in fre1uency in the changes in fre1uency in the !.$#4*h; wave. !.$#4*h; wave. !.$#4*h; wave.

Hloc- Fiagram of the <nterferometer Dscillator )pecial than-s is given to .ames Hare for the special wor- he did to ma-e all this happen in the Iife field. ?ithout him you would not even be this far along. 2lso& special than-s is given to Tom Hearden for his insight into the the scalar vector field and 40wave mi8ing using pump waves.

Tom Hearden's 40?ave *i8ing

.ohn Mrane's )imple )1uare ?ave Generator Fr. )trec-er too- care of .ohn Mrane while we were wor-ing together. Mrane sold us just simple sine wave generators right off the shelf00they did not wor- for anything. Hut don't ta-e my word for it as to what happened. Tal- to Tom Hearden. Tal- to the !% people that got sued for /# million dollars. That was just one of his phony lawsuits and just ended up costing everybody involved big money.

Fr. Iife and *r. >oyland .ohn Mrane was never given any of the circuits that < was developing at the time. They were potted in bloc- modules and placed into the machines Mrane sold out from underneath us. <n the mean time& .ohn Mrane was selling phony s1uare wave generators for K!##.## each& claiming that these would cure you. ?ell& they didn't cure anyone& and people died. ?hen the (F2 showed up& Mrane ran as fast as he could. )o after that& < loc-ed the shop up and would never let Mrane bac- in. Fon't get me wrong& .ohn Mrane had many wonderful things to offer the world& but he lost integrity because of the lac- of money. ?hen we were developing the new generators to test on cultures that Fr. )trec-er was in charge of& .ohn Mrane was treating people in the front office against all the rules and protocols laid out by Fr. )trec-er. >e would sell the polarity research manuals over and over to different people& and these belonged to all of us wor-ing on this project. .ohn Mrane was an e8pert draftsman and could draw anything you gave him. To draw a microscope was child's play for him to do. Iife trained him well in all the sciences. < had everything that .ohn Mrane had in his basement to amuse myself with00all the drawings& pictures& lenses& steam sterili;ers& 2rgon loops& Iife tubes& test e1uipment& and many other

undisclosed& secret prototype machines that Iife and Mrane were wor-ing on...all of the things the 'Iife gurus' have never seen.

.ohn Mrane +8plaining Iife

.ohn Mrane in a )ilent *oment

*y story goes on with some more important things that < have ta-en from my lab notes and general discussions with Fr. )trec-er& Mrane and others. The pictures above...this is the way .ohn Mrane loo-ed at the time. Fr. )trec-er was in charge of the research and development. *y brother and < closed the doors and moved the wor-ers to a different building because this was a private project and had nothing to do with the business we were conducting at the time. Fr. )trec-er was a true believer in getting this technology out& and so were the !% people involved. The first problem with .ohn Mrane was to pay his bac- rent and and a few other pending bills. 2gain& .ohn Mrane and Iife had many wonderful proven inventions. ?e found .ohn in absolutely filthy conditions& starving. >e was ma-ing electrodes by cutting pieces of brass which he would solder on to the meter probes of an off0the0shelf fre1uency generator. Then& he would resell these units with these probes for K5## along with the polarity research manual for another K!##. <n a short time& he'd sell another !% units& one to each member of the group. To wal- through .ohn Mrane's house was to wal- through some -ind of a ma;e00bo8es everywhere& things piled on tables& dust a half inch thic- in some areas& rooms that you could not even get into& bo8es& and more bo8es. The front yard was full of all -inds of different inventions and contraptions. ?hether they wor-ed or not was un-nown. Fr. )trec-er too- care of Mrane& and Mrane lived with him day and night at )trec-er's apartment in 7ittle Ioc-. )trec-er would bring Mrane to the shop in the morning and pic- him bac- up in the evening after we discussed everything that was accomplished during the day. .ohn Mrane was a true mentor of Iife& and he understood everything Iife understood because Iife trained him. To 1uote Mrane precisely& 'Iife told me the secret to the machine& and < -now how to build it.' )o we -now Mrane understood that a simple s1uare wave generator would not cure anything . < got Mrane to admit this to me when

one day < as-ed him& '?hy are you selling these simple s1uare wave generators=' Mrane responded by saying& '<t wor-s on some people...that's good enough.' )trec-er told Mrane& 'That's not a good thing to do with people that have cancer or another debilitating disease.' 2nd then Mrane would say& '< have given the list of fre1uencies.' )o right there& Mrane admitted that the machine he was selling may have wor-ed for some& but not for others. Fr. )trec-er& at this point& would just sha-e his head and wal- away& but he was not about to give up his hope to ma-e this technology wor-. < wanted to -now what was missing from all the papers Mrane sold everybody. < wanted to -now what the real transmitter was and what was missing from it. 9,ote that Mrane never mentioned it to .ohn *arsh& Ioc-well or anybody else.: Mrane's answer to me about the transmitter was& '<t's in the boo- you bought right here on this page.' < would argue with him by telling him that the circuit diagrams he was selling were not even functional. 2nd then < would as- him why the circuits did not looanything li-e the real machines did that were sitting right in front of us. Mrane would then just say& 'The s1uare wave generator wor-s better& and you will not cause any interference with radios...Go ahead hoo- up the transmitter and the tube. <t's right here.' )o < hoo-ed it up li-e he said& and it didn't -ill anything )trec-er had in the incubator at the time00no matter what fre1uency the dial was set at. 7ater& it was found that the generator was not producing any modulation in the 2S5% machine& so we fi8ed that& and it still would not -ill anything in the incubator...even with Mrane running the machine. < thin- the thing that e8cited Fr. )trec-er the most were the reports about the microscope. < 1uote him from my notes& '< have tal-ed to some people that bought .ohn Mrane's microscopes& and they report that they can see things never seen before. They say they can get 5###8 out of the scope.' ,ow Mrane could have built this scope at the shop with the metal wor-ing machines we had& but he refused for some reason& so we were forced to buy a regular medical microscope to study the things we could see. )ome of these things can be seen in Mrane's lab notes that are now on )tan Truman's site at www.rife.org/johncrane.html. These are only a few of the notes Mrane would carry around with him. The one set of papers that are missing contain all the research wor- done on the Iisley 3risms and why Iife chose to use them. Mould it be that Iife -new more then he was telling all the medical people= < thin- so because of .ohn Mrane's comment to me in my lab notes& 'Jou must modulate this virus with light to see it. <t must become resonate with the light interference.' <n other words& you must cause light interference before the subject would appear. Then& it could be seen in it's own color. ?e are tal-ing about interferometry or heterodyning. Qsing this process& one can change the phases of light& canceling certain fre1uencies out and adding others together& i.e. 'a special mi8er for light'. < don't -now of any microscopes that will do this today. There are some that use ultraviolet and with these you can see the cancer cells. Hut so what= Jou can see them under electron microscopes also. < want to see

the colors Iife tal-ed about. This is very important because radio waves also emit different colors as the transmitter is broadcasting. <f you could see an 2* or (* transmitter running& each antenna would be emitting a different color for that fre1uency in the radio spectrum. Jour eyes just can't see this due to their limited bandwidth. >+T+IDFJ,<,GA )++ httpA//cat.middlebury.edu/\3>*anual/acousto.html The conversations with Mrane would continue until the end of the day. Then < would continue to build the parts for the universal microscope in the machine shop. <t was the prism holders that were missing& so < wor-ed until they were done. +verything else was there. Mrane then installed them& but still& nothing could be seen through the scope. Mrane would then start over with drawings. Furing these times& he would go bac- to the office and just fall into a deep sleep at the drafting table. Qpon wa-ing& he'd say& '<t's time for dinner. ?hen are we going to eat=' <t would ta-e half of my day just to get this far with Mrane& but when someone came in the shop that was loo-ing for one of those s1uare wave generators& Mrane was on his toes. >e would wal- into the bac- of the shop and say& 'Fon't we have a s1uare wave generator around here=' Then he'd ta-e whatever was laying around and sell it when you weren't loo-ing. < would just wait for the ne8t day when .ohn had gotten everything to eat and a good night's sleep. Then <'d start the 1uestions again the ne8t morning. < would cover everything two times with Mrane to ma-e sure that < did not miss anything. The group decided not to tell Mrane about anything when it came to the circuits that were being developed. They& after all& were paying the bill for this project. Mrane understood this& and& as long as he had money& everything was alright.

.ohn Mrane's Mertificate !"4/ Dn (ile at *y Mompany ?hen >e ?or-ed There *y tas- was to build the electronic circuits for testing the Iife technologies. .ohn Mrane was never given any of these circuits& and < always potted them with a compound that would grind your tools away if you attempted to get into the blocmodules. *y lab notes were not -ept in the building anywhere for security reasons. < would come bac- at night and build the circuits and boards so as not to give away what < was wor-ing on. < wor-ed nights to develop this electronic heterodyning interferometer unit and when < thought < had it& Fr. )trec-er and < would test it in front of Mrane. ?e did this many times before we got something to wor-. ?hen < would as- Mrane about the fre1uencies and if this is what he wanted to see on the scope& he would always say yes. Then Mrane made the significant comment& 'Jou need to understand that you must mimic the microscope in what it does to light up the virus so you can see them. The machine must wor- on the same principal as the microscope.' <mmediately& < stopped what < was doing and had to go sit down and thin- about what he had just said. This is not written this way anywhere until now for the first time. 9.ames Hare said that this is in the Iife& Thompson& *arsh patent application.: The ne8t two days < -ept going over this with Mrane and he would add a little more each time& 'Fr. Iife understood what made up the bacteria and virus that

he wanted to -ill with his fre1uency instrument.' < 1uic-ly reali;ed why nothing was wor-ingN the fre1uency instrument was not built right. There had to be a hidden side to this Iife machine with unseen& embedded fre1uencies. < as-ed Mrane if Iife -new that the virus and bacteria fre1uencies had more to them then he was telling. Mrane answered& '>e found out that some of these virus and bacteria needed more then one fre1uency at a time to destroy it& even cancer.' That answered my 1uestion. There was more to this machine then the people wor-ing on them -new& and that -ept the secret safe.

)ome of the notes .ohn left behind also in the Mrane file. ,otice to the left bottom he was wor-ing on a special prism and holders for the R3 'Qniversal'.

The unit was not complete yet and more wor- needed to be done to get this to worevery time. Tom Hearden was told what it was and did write about it in a boo- called 2<F) Hiological ?arfare in a chapter called F+4+7D3<,G T>+ +7+MTID*2G,+T<M MQI+ (DI 2<F)& +ncouraging 3reliminary ?or- on page /%4. Tom Hearden did come and visit and see everything that we were doing with electromagnetic pump waves and mi8ing using interferometers and heterodyning units. ?hen we did get something to wor- we would repeat the test over and over. Mrane would as- what circuits we were using& but neither of us would answer him& and we'd change the subject. ?e could -ill certain things but not others. Then came the day when we had 3# doctors in the room with us. ?e prepared the slide& put it under the microscope and put it up on a view screen so all could see. Dne push of the button on the machine& and H2,G& the one cell animal was dead. 2ll the doctors just went nuts. Hut the comments were very discouraging& '?+ ?<77 ,+4+I T27 2HDQT T><)& ?+ ?<77 7DD)+ DQI .DH)& T>+ (F2 ?<77 IQ, Q) DQT D( TD?,& ?+ ?<77 7D)+ +4+IJT><,G.' The main objection was that everything < did with the circuits was potted. Mrane was the first to agree with all of them about this& saying there was something hidden in there& arguing& '?e can't see it so we don't -now if it wor-s.' < answered that we must protect what we have done so no one can change anything in the circuits. < -ept very detailed notes as < went along on the circuits. 2t first they were very simple waves of different fre1uencies. 2s time went by& the waves got more comple8.

2 )imple <nterferometer
!#//6/#5

Iife comments in Mrane's boo-& 'Qnder the universal microscope& disease

organisms& such as those of tuberculosis& cancer& sarcoma& streptococcus& typhoid& staphylococcus& leprosy& hoof and mouth disease& and others& may be observed to succumb when e8posed to certain lethal fre1uencies& coordinated with the particular fre1uencies peculiar to each individual organism& and directed upon them by rays covering a wide range of waves.' Iife's first machine used two transmitters. These two transmitters produce a mi8ing of fre1uencies 9<,-<D) and the addition of some fre1uencies 9<,E<D :. <n the mi8ing process many waves are produced with many fundamentals. The scope pictures above show what the mi8ing process produces. These wide band radio waves must contain all the fundamental fre1uencies for the -nown virus. The transmitters are then adjusted to produce the correct fundamental fre1uency. This is done by adjusting the amplitude output of one of the fundamental oscillators which changes the fundamental fre1uency and creates many harmonics of other fundamental fre1uencies& one behind the another& slightly out of phase. 2n e8ample of this would be to ta-e $/>;& at 34 pea- to pea-& and !.#5"->;& at 54 peato pea-& and mi8 the two to get a total output of !.54 pea- to pea-& gating the oscillator at !5#m4& and then modulating the !.$###*>; transmitter. The fre1uency ends up being !.55$!/# 9the fundamental: with all the the harmonics added. Man you see that this is not as simple as just a single fre1uency s1uare wave= The s1uare waves were Mrane's ideas& not Iife's. 9)1uare waves only contain odd harmonics with amplitude.:

(undamental 3lus !st >armonic Two ?ave's& ,ormal *i8er

)ine ?ave 3lus (irst and )econd >armonics. ,otice the shape change of sine wave.

The Iife machine must do all these fundamentals at one time& the spectrum analysis can show this. !#//"/#5 *ore than 65W of the organisms Iife could see with his Qniversal *icroscope are only visible with ultra0violet light. Hut ultraviolet light is outside the range of human vision. <t is 'invisible' to us. Iife overcame this limitation by heterodyning& a techni1ue which became popular in early radio broadcasting. >e illuminated the microbe 9usually a virus or bacteria: with two different wavelengths of the same ultraviolet light fre1uency which resonated with the spectral signature of the microbe.

These two wavelengths produced interference where they merged. This interference was& in effect& a third& longer wave which fell into the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. This was how Iife made invisible microbes visible without -illing them& a feat which today's electron microscopes cannot duplicate.

The 2S05%& 2 ?or-ing *D32 Transmitter. To gain an understanding of what a '*D32' transmitter is&
)eehttpA//vintageham.com/stations.htm This lin- will give you a better understanding of the transmitter Iife used. <nstead of an antenna& he used a gas tube. <n the beginning he used two of these tunable oscillators into the same gas tube. < suspect that Iife figured out how to use the noble gas tube to mi8 fre1uencies. < will be running the e8periments to see what happens.

The 2S 5% transmitter must be tuned within !W of the fre1uency fundamental to destroy the pathogen you're wor-ing with. )ee httpA//icehouse.net/john34/crystal.mpg& for e8ample. The transmitter is a re0design of the original *D32 9*aster Dscillator 3ower 2mplifier: used by Iife. This is not what .ohn Mrane or .ohn *arsh designed. The carrier fre1uency must be at 4.33*>; to wor- with >oyland's fre1uency list. >oyland's fre1uency list was accurate within !W under all circumstances. The *icroscope was altered& and so was the transmitter. < have found the missing tube for the modulation and the missing circuit for the gating. < will be adding more on this later. The crystal is a pie;o from a water purifier. <t's oscillating fre1uency is "6#->;. The transmitter had a carrier wave of 4.33*h; and an audio fre1uency of 3$.""!->; to achieve resonance. 2gain <'m saying that you can not be off more then !W. Than- you )tan for suggesting this test. < have repeated this test using a s1uare wave into the 2S05% transmitter. <t is as < e8pected& the s1uare wave does not have the correct fundamentals in this band to worwith this transmitter. )ee it here httpA//icehouse.net/john34/s1uare!!!.mpg. The )1uare wave has all odd harmonics as can be seen below. < have& however& found

where the resonate fre1uency is of this pie;o crystal is using a s1uare wave. The s1uare wave produces the same voltage level. (or e8ample& if the sine wave audio is at 3$."" ->; for this crystal& the s1uare wave will be at 64.#$3->;& and both waves will produce a 5 volt output level from the crystal. )ee httpA//icehouse.net/john34/s1uare///.mpg. *y conclusion is that either

wave will wor- but you must be much higher in fre1uency with a s1uare wave to get the same effect. The transmitter must accept a full audio spectrum from !#>; to !5# h;. < have only done this with 'tubes' so far.

!#/3#/#5 The sine wave does something very different. The original sine wave is in red. ?hen we reduce c to !/4& we get the blue sine wave. (or values of c of !//& /& and 4 we get green& purple& and olive sine waves respectively. <t is clear that when we ma-e c smaller& the point the wave crosses the 8 a8is from negative to positive moves left. ?hen we increase the value of c this point moves to the right. ?e conclude from this that the phase of the sine wave shifts to the left or right 9i.e.& negative or positive with respect to the origin: as c gets smaller or larger. )o& we see that the phase of the sine wave is directly related to c. )ee below.

.ohn Mrane and .ohn *arsh had the real wor-ing machine. )o why did they change it= <f the machine Iife gave to .ohn *arsh was tube driven& this answers the 1uestion. They did not understand tubes& nor did they want to wor- with them. They tried '*unt;ing' it so it could be produced cheap. They too- circuits out of it& but it did not wor- after that. The other 1uestion is& who altered the transmitter from the real >oyland design= *y best guess is *arsh and Mrane& in an effort to -eep the secret of the machine. The 2S05% <'m wor-ing with has the correct circuits put bac- into the machine. <t also has the correct gating circuits for the triode tube and can run in either mode. !#/3!/#5 The 2S05% *D32 transmitter broadcasting through the 3hanatron tube is very directional. This is why the doctors had the tube so close to the patient. )ee here httpA//icehouse.net/john34/phanatron!.mpg. The modulation is the -ey to the *D32 transmitter. < call this low band (* modulation. The fre1uency can not be listened to on 2*& but can be heard on a low band (* all the way to !5 h; . )ee it here httpA//icehouse.net/john34/modgrid!.mpg. !!/#!/#5 < have decided to -eep updating this site with the actual results of the e8periments < will be conducting. 2fter < have reconstructed what < believe to be the original Iife circuitry& fre1uency analysis will show any coordination between the original fre1uencies listed in Iife's lab notes and the now published fre1uencies measured by >oyland. < will ma-e every effort to document& on this site& the e8perimental evidence < find. The results < find will not be embellished in any way. The whole purpose of this research is to find and disclose the truth about Iife's fre1uencies. ?hen < find out& everyone will -now& and they can do what they want with the information. < am not a doctor& so < never have& nor ever will& ma-e

any medical claims for the circuits.

2 few e8periments today show that the wave coming off the 3hanatron tube e8cites the crystal with classical I( penetration characteristics. The power drops with distance. <t easily penetrates through flesh 9my hand for e8ample:& but is partially bloc-ed by a sheet of copper. !!///#5 <n the following e8periment& >oyland's given audio fre1uency was input 9as a sine wave: into the machine and modulated on the I( carrier wave. ?e wanted to see if this would produce a powerful harmonic at >oyland's measured fre1uency from Iife's !"34 instrument. The analysis was done ta-en with an oscilloscope probe tip 9shorted to its own ground so as not to damage the e1uipment with high rf power levels: directly in front of the Iife tube. ?ith slight adjustment of the I( carrier wave& and& in some cases& slight adjustment of the audio fre1uency& we were indeed able to show that a powerful harmonic does indeed e8ist at each particular fre1uency >oyland gave. ?e also found that proper adjustment of the audio signal level 9dH: was important. <f this is what >oyland and Iife were doing& the spectrum analysis shows us that this process produces several powerful harmonics& each around the same power level. This could e8plain why there was so much confusion as to what the actual fre1uencies were. <t also raises the issue that the documented fre1uencies may or may not be the ones that actually -illed the germs& but perhaps a higher or lower harmonic.

3athogen #o6land

's $eas51e d F1e=5en cies 01om the ';*G &i0e &a6 HG <nstrume nt

#o6land A5dio Necessa1 a11ie1 's Gi3en F1e=5en 6 A5dio Wa3e A5dio c6 Le3el Necessa16 to F1e=5en Necessa 0o1 B1ing cies 16 to $od5lat #a1monic in B1ing ion &ange o0 #a1mon #o6land's ic in ,Sine A $eas51ed 1ms(&ange F1e=5enc6 o0 01om the #o6land ';*G &i0e 's &a6 HG $eas51 Inst15ment ed

Spect15m Anal6sis

F1e=5en c6 01om the ';*G &i0e &a6 HG Inst15m ent

Hacillus L

!&$#4 /!/65 /!/65 4.# 4 3." *>; ->;

H. Moli 9rod:

4!6 ->;

%#/# %#/! 4./ 4 3.$ *>;

H. Moli 9virus:

66# !6//# !6//# 4.! 4 3." *>; ->;

)treptoth !"/ ri8 ->;

6%6# 6%6# 3.# 4 3.6 *>;

Tubercul 3$" osis 9rod: ->;

%3## %44% 5.# 4 3.6 *>;

Tetanus

/34 ->;

!/## !/$% 4.% 4 3.$ *>;

Typhoid (ever 9rod:

6$# ->;

$"## $"## 3.! 4 3." *>;

Typhoid !&445 (ever !%$/# !%$/# 4.# 4 3.% *>; *>; 9virus:

!!/3/#5 +8periments conducted today show that there is indeed a major harmonic of the fundamental fre1uency from Iife's !"34 machine very near the fundamental audio fre1uency from >oyland's machine. ?ere >oyland's audio fre1uencies the true *.D.I.s= Fid Iife's machine produce a harmonic that was the *.D.I.=
#o6land's #o6land's $eas51ed Gi3en F1e=5encieso0 A5dio 0 the';*G &i0e %athogen F1e=5encie &a6 HG s ,he1ea0te1 Inst15ment called ,#e1ea0te1 #AFcalled #$FSlight AdA5stmen t o0 #$F 5sed to %e1cent co11elate De3iation maAo1 Spect15m Anal6sis ,4ith ha1monic #$F inp5t as s=5a1e 4a3eo0 #$F to Bl5eISlightl6 AdA5sted #$F #AF&edI#AF

Bacill5s + )'7)@2 #J '78.G :#J '72<G :#J

)K

B( oli ,3i15s-

'@7)). #J

@@. :#J

@8*(@ :#J

.(<K

B( oli ,1od-

<7.). #J

G'@ :#J

*<)() :#J

<K

!etan5s

'7).. #J

)*G :#J

)G* :#J

GK

St1eptoth1i @7<@. #J >

';) :#J

';)(@ :#J

.(*K

St1onge1 E3idence(((
Slight #o6land's #o6land's AdA5stmen $eas51ed Gi3en t o0 #$F F1e=5encieso0 A5dio 5sed to 0 the';*G &i0e %athogen F1e=5encie co11elate &a6 HG s ,he1ea0te1 maAo1 Inst15ment called ha1monic ,#e1ea0te1 #AFo0 #$F to called #$F#AF-

Spect15m Anal6sis ,4ith #$F inp5t as sine 4a3eBl5eISlightl6 AdA5sted #$F &edI#AF

%e1cent De3iatio n

Bacill5s + )'7)@2 #J '78.G :#J '72<G :#J

)K

B( oli ,3i15s-

'@7)). #J

@@. :#J

@8G(' :#J

.(<K

B( oli ,1od- <7.). #J

G'@ :#J

*;<(2 :#J

G(8K

!etan5s

'7).. #J

)*G :#J

';G :#J

'@K

St1eptoth1i> @7<@. #J

';) :#J

'@<(8 :#J

@K

!5be1c5losi <7*.. #J s ,1od-

*8; :#J

*<)(* :#J

*(8K

!6phoid ,3i15s-

'<78). #J '7GG2 :#J

'7GG8(* :#J

.K

!6phoid ,1od-

87;.. #J

@8. :#J

@@G(G2 :#J

'(<K

All tests so 0a1 indicate that the phanot1on t5be is a t1ansd5ce1 o0 elect1ical 4a3es to aco5stical 4a3es 4hich a1e able to mechanicall6 stim5late a pieJoc16stal to 1esonance( !his is something that an o1dina16 antenna s6stem ,i(e( a 9pad antenna9 s6stem- cannot do( We 0o5nd the t5be7 li:e an o1dina16 a5dio spea:e17 to be di1ectional( !he stim5lation o0 the c16stal 3a1ies 4ith the o1ientation o0 the t5be( ''/</.2

The 2S05% modulated with >oyland's /!&/65 >; HL fre1uency. The !!&6%#&### >; harmonic comes out dead on& but the machine's carrier fre1uency must be calibrated e8actly to do this. <n this case& it was 4.4 *>;. This is probably why the doctors complained of having to recalibrate the machines all the time& and often varied the fre1uencies around when using the machine.
Last Updated Feb 2, 2011

PLEASE NO !"E NE# #E$S! E LO"A !ON %OR OR&ER!N' !S (ttp)**r+,(arge.,om AN& O#NERS-!P .N&ER RENA!SSAN"E "-AR'E, LL" NE# $A ER/ S#APPER $/ 0$! S0 %OR SALE $ELO#.

Renaissan,e "(arge 1it "re2it "ar2 Or2ering "enter.

#e A,,ept "re2it "ar2s #it( or #it(o3t Pa4pal, an2 over p(one. Mlic- here forA

Bedini Boo*s and Bedini &.&s

&egiste1 no4 0o1 theF

RE/01++0/CE C2/FERE/CE 3,45 6711
A #or5s(op giving people a ,(an,e to spen2 time at t(e s(op 6it( 7o(n $e2ini an2 ot(ers o8 li5e+min2 in a,t3al assembl4 o8 "3tting E2ge Alternative Energ4 e,(nolog4.

Radiant Energ! Technolog!

?e are also selling Hedini +nergen8 Hattery Mhargers at

Ienaissance Mharge 77MA r0charge.com

Bedini Boo*s 8 Bedini &.&s 8 Mono ole sentaion &.& 8 -artial -arts 9it %or Bedini ++G Energi:er8 4arge 17 -ole Mono ole8 ; -ole Mono ole8 4arge 16 -ole Mono ole8 Classic < -ole Mono ole 8 0d"anced ++G Energi:er 8 Magnetic =indow Motor 9its 8 17 E>tra + ools 8 ' E>tra Magnets 8 R?7 =elding rods 8 Transistors 8 Bul#s 8 ?@ Brushless Fan 9it 8 17@ Brushless Fan 9it 8 E>tra Ca acitors 8 Magnet =ire 8 Custom Coils 8 Bi olar Circuit 8 Full Bi olar 9it 8 +eAuential Circuits 8 /eod!mium Magnets 8 <0m &C Meter 8 &onations

E>posing $6sticism and FE #oa>s

Renaissance ChargeBatter! +wa

er

"his new product is what Feff %ilson demonstrated at the 0enaissance 5ov D.,. 'nergy Gonference. More details will be posted shortly.
Helow picture is the one .eff used. 3roduction model will be different with more features.

The Hattery )wapper and Mharger is a compact& but very comple8 device to move batteries in and out of a load environment for the purpose of charging each battery individually. ?ith its 7MF read out & terminal monitoring& logging capabilities and comple8 programming& this device can be used as a ]2uto^ or ]*anual^ Mharger by selecting functionality presented on the 7MF or Terminal display. +ach section presented in this manual will e8plain the operational features of this device. .eff's description as te8t file. )olar 2pplication. !/4 Monfiguration. /44 Monfiguration. )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

Click here for:

Bedini Boo*s and Bedini &.&s

Fe#. 677' &.&
BE&1/1 M2/2-24E M2T2R E/ERG1BER -RE+E/T0T12/ An Overview and Demonstration of Basic Concepts, Building Instrctions, and Testing. Improvement and complete refilming of the 2007 video p t on !oogle "ideo# )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

httpA//tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Hedini_*onopole3 )ee our full ))G 3resentation page for pictures and video of the model setup. *ost of the parts needed to build the +nergi;er

%a1tial %a1ts Lit 0o1 Bedini SSG $oto1 Ene1giJe1

/ow comes with %ull circuit #oard, resistor jum er addition, and wire terminal.

Incl des a tin$ bottle of drops of %celpl s l be &nd 'e( Feb 200) *resentation +"+ mentioned above#

,rder parts for (hat (e are b ilding on the list# *arts as sho(n in photos (ill be: -.L211/0 1ransistor, ) ceramic ) magnets 234) b$ 1 74) b$ 74) ceramic grade ) magnets5 2for bigger (heels (e recommend 12620 magnets belo(5, t(o diodes, one resistor, 1 potentiometer, one neon b lb, one small piece of al min m (ith some transistor grease bet(een it and the transistor, 2 coils of (ire (o nd bifilar on a spool (ith the (elding rods c t and fitted in the spool as the core# For above parts e%cl ding a rotor, frame, shaft, bearings, scre(s, batteries, batter$ (ires, clips, gl e and tape, click belo(: )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

F5ll SSG ci1c5it boa1d. Iesistor jumper addition& and contact terminal with above -it only& or by special order. ,o parts but board included. )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

La1ge Bedini '. %ole $onopole(

-onopole replication of the large classic 7nergi8er# 1his kit is made available beca se h ndreds of people have asked for it over the $ears# 9e are providing a service to s ch people so that the$ can e%periment (ith this technolog$ and not have to spend tens of tho sands of dollars having this s$stem made p b$ machinists# It is not f ll$ assembled and (ill not be assembled for people pon re: est# It is for learning and research p rposes# 7%periment at $o r o(n risk# ;it is molded and machined to the highest : alit$# 1his kit has 10 3< motor coils and a 17< al min m rotor# )0 (ires (ith )0 circ its on 10 circ it boards# It has an al min m base frame (ith ple%$ glass top# =o (ill be able to r n the machine not onl$ at 12" and 20" imp ts, b t over 100"# 1he larger the batter$ bank sed the more $o (ill get o t of it 2provided the batteries are in good condition5# 1he s$stem allo(s for the charging bank to be considerabl$ higher voltage than the primar$ batter$ bank 2or the same if desired5# &lso incl ded is a generator coil that po(ers L7+s to light p the >edini logo and clear plastic# Incl des )0 ??! circ its, heat sink and pads, (ire to batteries, clips, small sample of %celpl s# Comes (ith instr ction C+ and ??! +"+ sold above# C stomer assembles rotor, frame and circ it# =e now o%%er an additional attachment that will attach to this 17 coiler that will %unction li*e the earl! Bedini Energi:er s!stem re licated #! 3im =atson. 1t will consist o% a rotor with magnets, and energi:er coils with %rame assem#l!. 1t will allow %or #ac* charging the rimar! #atter! #an* or owering additional loads isolated %rom the 17 coiler Csee #elowD. 1he 10 coiler can be r n (ith some of the motor coils replaced (ith one (ire energi8er coils for the same p rposes# ,r this s$stem can be r n as a 20 or 30 coiler for additional cost 2see belo(5# ?hipped in five bo%es# )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

17 Generator one wire coils added to the 17 coiler *it.

10 one (ire coils 2spools filled5 (ith mo nting molds, another rotor (ith magnets, and (ith frame assembl$# 9ire all 10 coils in series and $o can p t o t &C or rectif$ it to +C (ith a bridge# 1hen $o can add capacitors to store the charge and p lse it (ith the 1esla ?olar *o(er &mplifier or other p lser into the front end or a load of $o r choice# 1his is ',1 the same as a 20 coiler as sho(n belo(# )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

0dditional 17 coils to ma*e 67 or <7 coils on the same

%rame. 1ncludes all additional arts to ma*e 17 more coils and circuits with additional #ac*ing late, %or dou#le the ower and out ut.

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

lassic Bedini '. %ole $onopole i1c5it boa1d ,0o1 < SSG ci1c5its-(
1he circ it board has the potential for ) ??! circ its (ith neon b lbs holes, diode holes, and several other feat res# 1he above kit comes (ith all circ it parts, incl ding a s(itch that tr ns off the board thro gh the trigger (ire b ss# 1hat is, the trigger (ire coming off the master coil 2other side goes to negative5 comes to the board at one hole# 1here is also another hole on the board for another (ire to connect to go to the ne%t board for m ltiboard s$stems like this ten coiler# 1his then can connect to a s(itch so that the board can t rn off entirel$ 2.ohn@s <sense< s(itch5# 1his is nice on s ch a big s$stem (hen $o are (anting fle%ibilit$ for e%perimentation# From there the b ss is in series (ith a balance resistor, and from there the b ss

connects to each base resistor, either (ith a (ire terminal block 2as provided in the kit5, or A st directl$ to ) resistors# 1he terminal block allo(s for eas$ s(apping of resistors 2as (ell as removal of coil5 (itho t having to nsolder the board# 1he board (as made as small as possible given the parts sed and heat sinking# 1he transistors are mo nted psidedo(n so that their backing faces a(a$ from the board onto an al min m sink# ,ow )hipping. )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

Bedini G %ole $onopole J1(

This is a smaller version of the !# coiler by fre1uent re1uest. <t just has a smaller and different rotor and less coils. its are molded and machined to the highest 1uality. This -it has four 3.5' motor coils 9% strands of R/3 wire each: and a $' by ! 6/%' aluminum rotor. !//' shaft at least !/' long. 2lso included is a generator coil that powers 7+Fs& which could also be used to do other wor-. *ay eventually include a commutator on the bac- to pulse the stored charge from a capacitor. <ncludes 3/ ))G circuits& heat sinand pads& wire to batteries& spst switchs& small bottle of 8celplus. Momes with instruction MF and ))G F4F sold above. )hipping in 5 wee-s. B1C00 0 *ole .r# -onopole 2U?&4Canada shipping incl ded5

K!$## 4 3ole .r. *onopole 9<nternational shipping included:

Bedini G %ole $onopole S1(

This is a smaller version of the !# coiler by fre1uent re1uest. <t just has a smaller and different rotor and less coils. its are molded and machined to the highest 1uality. This -it has four 3.5' motor coils 9% strands of R!% wire each: and a $' by 3' aluminum rotor. 6/%' shaft at least !/' long. 2lso included is a generator coil that powers 7+Fs& which could also be used to do other wor-. *ay eventually include a commutator on the bac- to pulse the stored charge from a capacitor. <ncludes 3/ ))G circuits& heat sinand pads& wire to batteries& spst switchs& small bottle of 8celplus. Momes with instruction MF and ))G F4F sold above. )hipping in 5 wee-s. )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

La1ge Bedini ') %ole $onopole(

-onopole replication of a large 12 *ole 7nergi8er# 1his kit is made available beca se h ndreds of people have asked for it over the $ears# 9e are providing a service to s ch people so that the$ can e%periment (ith this technolog$ and not have to spend tens of tho sands of dollars having this s$stem made p b$ machinists# It is not f ll$ assembled and (ill not be assembled for people pon re: est# It is for learning and research p rposes# 7%periment at $o r o(n risk# ;it is molded and machined to the highest : alit$# 1his kit has 12 3#C< motor coils and a D< % 12< al min m rotor# /D E1) ga ge (ires (ith /D circ its on 12 circ it boards# It has an al min m base frame (ith ple%$ glass top# =o (ill be able to r n the machine not onl$ at 12" and 20" imp ts, b t higher# 1he larger the batter$ bank sed the more $o (ill get o t of it 2provided the batteries are in good condition5# 1he s$stem allo(s for the charging bank to be considerabl$ higher voltage than the primar$ batter$ bank 2or the same if desired5# &lso incl ded is a generator coil that po(ers L7+s to light p the >edini logo and clear plastic# Incl des /D ??! circ its, heat sink and pads, (ire to batteries, clips, small sample of %celpl s# Comes (ith instr ction C+ and ??! +"+ sold above# C stomer assembles rotor, frame and circ it# +ome o% the coiles can #e re laced with the single wire coils %or additional generator %unction C%or recharging the rimar! #atter! or owering other loads. ,rders placed no( ship appro%imatel$ D (eeks from pa$ment# &ll orders shipped in five bo%es# )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

lassic Bedini * %ole $onopole(

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html ?hort =o t be video Classic -onopole replication of the 7nergi8er# ;it is molded and machined to the highest : alit$# 1his kit has three 1#C< motor coils and a 3< al min m rotor, (ith al min m fl$(heel# &lso incl ded is a generator coil that po(ers 12 L7+s, (hich co ld also be sed to do other (ork, like recharge the primar$ batter$# -a$ event all$ incl de a comm tator on the back to p lse the stored charge from a capacitor# Incl des three ??! circ its, heat sink and pads, (ire to batteries, clips, potentiometer, spst s(itch, bottle of %celpl s# Comes (ith instr ction C+ and ??! +"+ sold above# 'o( ?hipping# )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

2ttachment Gear for ! to !5 persicion timing. 2llows for transducing output to postive charge with an added capacitor. 2lso included tiny magnet& transistor& bridge and reed switch. ?hort video of set p#

?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6charge#com4kits#html

Ad3anced Bedini $onopole and Solid State Ene1giJe1(

This -it includes all of the above ))G -it 9F4F also:& and parts for an advanced inverted circuit on the bac- end& and parts for a solid state circuit. <nstructions to be provided. 2 larger heat sin- is provided than above -it. <ncludes 4' of wire 9not all shown:& a project bo8 with wire terminals and grommet& and switches to switch between motor function and solid state function& and to switched between two different capacitor values for different -inds of charging purposes. 3rototype picture shown is not e8actly as parts loo-. 2 slightly larger project bo8 and 3 different potentiometers are provided for easier mounting and adjustment. The solid state function does not need the wheel and magnets. The coil shown in the picture is three R/3 wire& appro8. /##' and 45# winds& twisted. This is the second option below. (irst option is for the above coil with two wires 9R/3& R/$: in parallel not twisted& "## winds. )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html 9it with E77 winds o% F6< and F6? wireG 9it with 677$ o% three F6< wires twistedG 0d"anced 9it without the ++G artial arts *it Coil, Magnets,

4u#e, &.&, and ++G circuit %or those who ha"e that alread!.

Bedini Windo4 $oto1 Ene1giJe1 Lit A

1his 7< b$ )< energi8er is a caref ll$ machined frame and rotor (ith D ni: e >edini scalar manetic poles# 1he s$stem ses the entire magnetic field of the s per pole magnets for the greatest possible efficienc$ and energi8er f nction# 1his to$ si8e model is capable of r nning at 0 volts to possibl$ 0)" or more, (ith 1 to 20 motor coils and circ its for a ver$ large variation of po(er# 1he half inch solid brass shaft and caref ll$ degreased bearings (ith %celpl s l be allo(s for ver$ high rpm and strong motor f nction# 1he ni: e frame design allo(s for eas$ replacement of coils of different lengths and (idths of (ires, and eas$ mo nting to holes or do(els# +esign allo(s $o to easil$ take it apart, and to mo nt it as $o desire# 9e (ill make (hatever c stom si8e coil2s5 $o desire for this kit as sho(n on this (ebpage# 1he circ it provided is one f ll se: ential bipolar circ it sho(n belo(# &lso comes (ith t(o t$pes of (ire, terminal block, and t(o dpdt s(itches as sho(n in pict re# 1he kit can be sed to st d$ motor or energi8er f nction as (ell as serve as a platform for e%periments for self6r nning capabilitities as o tlined in the above Free 7nerg$ !eneration book# & fl$(heel, comm tator, or different t$pes of loads can be attached to the rotor for additional e%periments and benefits# ?$stem can be sed to charge p one or more batteries of 2 to 200F volts, or it can be r n as a one batter$ s$stem (ith the flip of a s(itch# ?1 allo(s for t(o different motor speeds as (ell as center off position# "al es of resistors and capacitor can also be s bstit ted to personal preference# Coils can be left flat or bent aro nd frame# ?hips in bo% at A st nder 0 po nds# )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

Bedini Windo4 $oto1 Ene1giJe1 Lit B

3icture shown above only shows one of the three coils provided. Gotor is D< he%agon (ith D< % 2< % 1< magnets# Comes (ith three motor coils and 3 bipolar se: ential circ its, Hall triggering, heat sinks, (ire, batter$ clips, etc# Coils (ill be formed for eas$ placement on motor# Ge: ires eas$ assembl$ (ith instr ctions provided# -otor frame can hold more than / motor (indings and can be r n (ith high voltages to make for a lot of tor: e# ,r it can be r n slo(l$ (ith ver$ little imp t 2like 10ma I 12"5# - ltistrand coils (ith additional circ itr$ can be ordered pon re: est# 9eighs appro%imatel$ 00 po nds# ?hipping re: ires t(o bo%es to red ce shipping costs# ?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6charge#com4kits#html
)ottom of $orm

'. Spools 5sed 4ith &eg5la1 siJe Bedini $onopole Ene1giJe1s(

3 3/4' > by 3.5' top and bottom& 3/4 bore.

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

2 Spools 5sed 4ith Bedini $onopole Ene1giJe1s( '.. Spools 5sed 4ith S$ALL siJe Bedini $onopole Ene1giJe1s(
!.5' > 8 !' ? 9top: !.6' 9base with holes:& !/4' bore. )trong plastic.

'. Small Spools 5sed 4ith S$ALL Bedini $onopole Ene1giJe1s(

?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6charge#com4kits#html

2 Small Spools 5sed 4ith S$ALL Bedini $onopole Ene1giJe1s(

?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6charge#com4kits#html

< e1amic Bloc:s */< b6 ' @/< b6 @/< G1ade < $agnets 5sed 4ith Bedini $onopole Ene1giJe1s(

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

&8. '/'89 Welding &ods& 9no spool: $ o;& 3 !/4' long& ma-es 3/4' core.

?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6 charge#com4kits#html

!&ANSIS!"&S /,344# ,3,

-*?)C// *'*

/,344# ,3,

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html*.+3#55 ,3,

*.+/"55 3,3

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

>+203C '*'

-.1C020! '*'

Top of $orm )ottom of $orm

'. $JL)'';G N%N !1ansisto1s 5sed 4ith Bedini $onopole Ene1giJe1s(

?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6 charge#com4kits#html

Top of $orm )ottom of $orm

"1 2 $JL)'';G !1ansisto1s 5sed 4ith Bedini $onopole Ene1giJe1s(

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html
Top of $orm )ottom of $orm

'. $JL)'';* %N% !1ansisto1s 5sed 4ith Bedini $onopole Ene1giJe1s(

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0charge.com/-its.html

Top of $orm )ottom of $orm

Top of $orm )ottom of $orm

"1 2 $JL)'';* !1ansisto1s 5sed 4ith Bedini $onopole Ene1giJe1s(

Top of $orm )ottom of $orm

2'DC0/ ?CG

Hall 7ffect ?ensor ?(itch

Geed ?(itch <Geed ?(itches 1 Form & 12mm &1 101C ,;I<

CCC 1imer

SG*2)GN Fo1 Bedini !esla S4itch and F5ll apacito1 %5lse1

#''D' "ptoco5ple1 #V %hotot1ansisto1 Fo1

Bedini apacito1 %5lse1

B5lbs .(.)8Amp Incandescent Wi1e !e1minal G1ain o0 Wheat B5lb

See ne4 location o0 4ebsite 0o1 detailsF httpF//1B cha1ge(com/:its(html

2 Ne4 Neon NeB) B5lbs Used 4ith Bedini $onopole Ene1giJe1s(

See ne4 location o0 4ebsite 0o1 detailsF httpF//1B cha1ge(com/:its(html

Top of $orm )ottom of $orm

/2TE T)0T T0-E M2T2R 91T 1/ &.&1( is the same as the Brushles Motor Fan 9its #elowG

BR,+)4E++ M2T2R F0/

91T+

Bedini < to 2)V 2 Inch B15shless $oto1 Fan F5ll Lit

!his :it gi3es 6o5 all the pa1ts needed to const15ct the abo3e pict51ed b15shless moto1 Ene1giJe1( Does not come 4ith tools7 gl5e7 solde17 4i1e connecto1s7 o1 batte16 clips( Ene1giJe1 con3e1sion 1an 4ith s5ppl6 3oltages 01om <V to 2)VD ,3oltages o3e1 *8V ma6 1e=5i1e bette1 heat sin: 0o1 t1ansisto1s-( Fan is )GVD 1ated 0o1 )@W( ontains t4o o0 all the SSG ci1c5it pa1ts o0 the pa1tial :it abo3e pl5s mo1e( Does not incl5de an6 potentiomete1 b5t does ha3e G )W 1esisto1s ,b5ilde1 can s4ap these 1esisto1s 4ith othe1s s5pplied to change speed7 o1 5se othe1 3al5es-( La1ge1 diodes incl5ded( Added to this is the )@W b15shless 0an sho4n( Also as sho4n7 one plastic displa6 containe17 t4o )%D! s4itches ,so batte1ies can be 1otated-7 the ci1c5it and batte16 4i1e7 one capacito17 one p5lse1

ci1c5it7 and one tin6 amo5nt o0 >celpl5s l5be( See ne4 location o0 4ebsite 0o1 detailsF httpF//1B cha1ge(com/:its(html
Top of $orm )ottom of $orm

Bedini < to 2)V 8 Inch B15shless $oto1 Fan F5ll Lit

Same :it as abo3e b5t 4ith la1ge 89 0an(

.er! low res. (MB "ideo o% the %an running #e%ore and a%ter it was con"erted to an Energi:er. Better Aualit! "ideo o% this.

"3e13ie4 and con3e1sion o0 the 0an is sho4n in a 3ideo 4ith W$V 0o1mat that 4ill be sent on a D 4ith the :itF !his is the lo4e1 =5alit6 Google 3ideo( "the1 3ideos and pict51es a1e incl5ded( !his is a little highe1 =5alit6( See ne4 location o0 4ebsite 0o1 detailsF httpF//1B cha1ge(com/:its(html

'. Inch Bedini <B2)V B15shless $oto1 Fan F5ll Lit

17 inch Brushless Energi:er "ideo. +ame *it as a#o"e #ut with large 17@ %an that is rated %or HH7CFMs C1.60 6;.D. Energi:er con"ersion ran with su l! "oltages %rom '. to H6.&C C"oltages o"er 6;. reAuire #etter heat sin* %or transistorsD.
Top of $orm )ottom of $orm

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0 charge.com/-its.html

9e also have 10 f 2C0" $ello( capacitors for B1 each#

+atasheet *+F ?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6 charge#com4kits#html

9e also have CD0 F 000" capacitors for BC each#

?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6 charge#com4kits#html

; to '' %o5nd Spools o0 $agnet Wi1e

)hipping on second& fourth& si8th& etc.& !# pound spool is free for Q)2 9as it fits in 3riority (.I. Ho8:& so clicappropriate lin-s below. Mombine any two spools of wire. )ubstitutions of other thic-er wire 9R!4 to R/5: available upon re1uest for same price& and thinner wire than R/$ for slightly more cost. *agnet ?ire is made and wound by +sse8 or other company and will vary from " to !! pounds. Typical total weight is over !# pounds& many are over !! pounds. )pool is $.4 o;. H)* #ea36 ins5llation( 9/3 >4J G3/*I0/## MQ$L3.5: )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0 charge.com/-its.html

5stom oils 0o1 Bedini $oto1s

Moils all hand wound for 1uality control. *ade of *agnet wire shown above. 7et us -now sales`r0charge.com what coil you want made for either the Hedini ?indow *otor or *onopole. ?indow coils not to be twisted& but monopole coils can be twisted as special order.

=indow Motor windings C177$ lengthsD %or small *it including trigger wireCsDG
Top of $orm

?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6 charge#com4kits#html

)ottom of $orm

+econdar! windings C177$D %or second and third coils not needing triggers.
Top of $orm

?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6 charge#com4kits#html

)ottom of $orm

=indow Motor windings C1H7$ lengthsD %or small *it including trigger wireCsDG
Top of $orm

?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6 charge#com4kits#html

)ottom of $orm

+econdar! windings C1H7$D %or second and third coils not needing triggers.
Top of $orm )ottom of $orm

Bedini Mono ole Coils on + ool with R?7 Rod CoresG C%ree shi ing on 6 or more coils under 67 ounds totalD
Top of $orm

?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6 charge#com4kits#html

)ottom of $orm

The Rest o% the Below =ire is Twisted #e%ore =indingG

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0 charge.com/-its.html

Fi"e -ound Coils C%ree shi and ;th under 67 ing on 6nd, <rd, oundsDG

1H7 Foot long coils twistedG

Top of $orm )ottom of $orm

* H)* Wi1e ).. Foot ,abo5t G2. 4inds- long coils t4istedF

See ne4 location o0 4ebsite 0o1 detailsF httpF//1B cha1ge(com/:its(html )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0 charge.com/-its.html
' F6< =ire 677 Foot long coils twistedG Energi:er Coil, one wire F6< on <.H@ s ool %illed Ca ro>. H oundsD with 1I1?@ R?7 rodsG

Top of $orm )ottom of $orm

"1de1 o0 )nd7 and *1d is 01ee shipping(

67 -ound '@ diameter Coil '1 F6< =ires Twisted %or Multistrand Mono ole or +olid

+tate circuitsG D< high# Center of coil (ill be filled (ith (elding GD0 9elding Gods for a Core# ?hipped in Flat Gate *riorit$ bo%#

Bipola1 i1c5it &eplacement o0 SSG i1c5it 0o1 0i1st SSG Lit(

Montians D,+ of each !- 3/4? pot& *.+/"55& *.+3#55& *3)2#$& /2 bridge& !,"!4 IesistorsA !## ohms& //# ohms& /@ 46# ohms. Foes not include wire& magnet wire& coil& rotor& frame& glue& magnets& batteries& capacitor&

2mperemeter& tape& heat sin-& shaft& )!& or solder. *ay include tiny circuit board.

Bipola1 i1c5it 4ith %a1tial $oto1 Lit(

This contains the above Hipolar Mircuit with the rest of the first ))G -it 9magnets& coil& core rods& 8celplus lube& F4F:.

S$ALL Se=5ential Bipola1 i1c5it 0o1 Bedini $agnetic Windo4 $oto1(

Mlic- above picture and see circuit on right side. This is the same as above 9circuit only: but with double the parts e8cept for the capacitor and bridge. Montians T?D of each !- 3/4? pot& *.+/"55& *.+3#55& *3)2#$& !,"!4& IesistorsA !## ohms& //# ohms& 4.6- 9if you want the other resistor values instead& let me -now:N (our 46# ohms resistors& and one /2 bridge& and one !#uf /5#4

capacitor. Foes not include wire& magnet wire& coil& rotor& frame& glue& magnets& batteries& 2mperemeter& tape& heat sin-& shaft& )!& or solder. Drder one or in pac-s of five for discount. Dr order pac-s of five for larger multistrand systemsA )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0 charge.com/-its.html

LA&GE Se=5ential Bipola1 i1c5it 0o1 Bedini $agnetic Windo4 $oto1(

Mlic- above picture and see circuit on left side. *ay be used with 3 to 5#4 9if tranistors are -ept under !5#(: battery ban-. This is the same as above but with larger transistors amd bridge Montians T?D of each !- 3/4? pot& *.7/!!"4& *.7/!!"3& *3)2#$& !,"!4& IesistorsA !## ohms& //# ohms& 4.6-& aluminum heatsin-s 9not as shown in picture:& N (our mica insulators& 46# ohms resistors& one 42 !- bridge& and one !#uf /5#4 capacitor. Foes not include wire& magnet wire& coil& rotor& frame& glue& magnets& batteries& 2mperemeter& tape& shaft& )!& or solder. Drder one or in pac-s of five for discount. )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0 charge.com/-its.html Dr order pac-s of five for larger multistrand systemsA

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0 charge.com/-its.html

NE"DD$IU$ $AGNE!S F"& $AGNE!I WIND"W $"!"&

<nternational orders need to contact us for shipping costs and details.

+i> 7.H@ > 7.H@ > 1@ 4ong /eod!mium 1ron Boron /dFeB Bloc* Magnet Grade /;6
-agneti8ed thro gh 1< length, poles are on the 0#C%0#C< ends &ppro%imate p lling force: CC lbs ?ee ne( location of (ebsite for details: http:44r6 charge#com4kits#html

1he above pict re sho(s magnets that are act all$ half the si8e 2142< % 1< % 2<5

4ideo of .ohn Hedini's motor in self0running mode using these magnets. 4ideo of above pictured motor using half the magnet si;e.

Grade ,4/& stronger than ,4#& ,35& ,3% *agneti;ed through the /' 7ength 9poles are on the !8!' surfaces: 2ppro8imate pulling forceA /#6 lbs Gauss IatingA !3/##

Si> '9 > '9> )9 Neod6mi5m NdFeB Bloc: $agnets7 NiB 5BNi %lated

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0 charge.com/-its.html

Si> G9 > '9 > '9 !hic: &a1e Ea1th Neod6mi5m NdFeB Bloc: $agnets7 G1ade NG)7 Nic:elB oppe1BNic:el *BLa6e1 oated
Hr*a8A !33## gauss H>*a8A 4/ *GDe *agneti;ed through the !' Thic-ness 2ppro8imate pulling forceA /#5 lbs

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0 charge.com/-its.html

/5W stronger than ,35 *agneti;ed through the Thic-ness /'& poles are on the 48/ surfaces pull forceA $!# lbs )ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0 charge.com/-its.html

Si> G9 > )9 > )9 NiB 5BNi %lated Neod6mi5m NdFeB $agnet Bloc: NG2

.B2A D ANAL"G WIDEVIEW %ANEL $E!E&(

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0

charge.com/-its.html

*.A D ANAL"G WIDEVIEW %ANEL $E!E&(

)ee new location of website for detailsA httpA//r0 charge.com/-its.html "(oose belo6 i8 4o3 6o3l2 li5e to 2onate to 83rt(er t(is ministr4. All (elp is appre,iate2. Or ,(oose belo6 n3mbers to a22 a22itional s(ipping amo3nts. Dur name isA &enaissance ha1ge7 LL ( Dur 2ddress isA '.'<* N( Ae1o D1 Ste *( #a6den7 ID <*<*2 %honeF ,).<- @@)BG2'G potentialtec at 6ahoo ( com !han: 6o5(
Co !right J 677?-6711 Renaissance Charge, 44C.

3ohn Bedini
From 9ikipedia, the free enc$clopedia . mp to: navigation, search

John Bedini of the Hedini +lectronics company is an electrical engineer. >e created H.2.).+.& an audio signal processorN and he has filed patents for a number of audio technologies.Z![Z/[Z3[Z4[ 2dditionally& on his personal ?eb site& Hedini has self0published a number of articles related to e8perimental methods for generating and transmitting electrical energy.

Contents
JhideK 11heoretical inventions 2-arketed prod cts 2#1>edini & dio ?pacial 7nvironment 2#2Compact disc clarifier 2#3>atter$ chargers4reA venators

3Geferences 07%ternal links

KeditLTheoretical in"entions
Hedini is one of many engineersZ5[ who claim to have designed or co0designedZ$[ machines that do not adhere to conservation of energy. )uch inventions are generally considered perpetual motion machines. Hedini was granted several patents for such devices.Z6[Z%[Z"[Z!#[

KeditLMar*eted

roducts

KeditLBedini 0udio + acial En"ironment

The Hedini 2udio )pacial +nvironment or Hedini 2udio )pectral +nhancer 9H.2.).+. or H2)+: is an audio signal processor invented by Hedini. 2ccording to Hedini's company's mar-eting literature& H.2.).+.0enhanced stereo sound is played through a pair of loudspea-ers& its principal effect is to fool the ear into perceiving only the right0channel sound in the right ear& and the left0 channel sound in the left ear& even though both ears are receiving sound from both channels.Z!![ )eemingly contradicting this claim& the following information was provided by .ohn Hedini in his comments about the streaming audio station he created on Fecember 3#& /##4A
The B.A.S.E. processor anal !es and separates a stereo signal into a stereo and mono path. The mono information can "e moved forward, "ac#ward, side to side or an where within $%& degrees without loss of stereo am"ient space. The stereo space can "e increased or decreased while the mono signal is set an where desired. The results is an enhanced signal that goes "e ond stereo, while ena"ling the user to "e in complete control of all spacial aspects. 'hen B.A.S.E. is applied in the mi(ing or mastering process the

effect can "e )uite ama!ing, it is the onl process that can create a *olographic Audio Image in open air. +rocessing of an live stream of music can "e encoded with B.A.S.E. on "oth the outermost left,right channels, as well as the stereo-surround channels, to create a seamless, $%&-degree spacial environment.J12K

,o reliable& independent verification of any of these claims has been made. <n !"%5& T4< )ystems& 7td. 97os 2ngeles& M2: was granted Q) 45556"5 for a 'monaural to binaural audio processor&' as invented by .ohn Hedini. The patent says the invention could be used in parallel to process multiple audio sources such as the left and right channels of stereo output& and the resulting pair of stereo signals could then be mi8ed.
KeditLCom act disc clari%ier

Hedini's electronics company mar-ets a compact disc 'clarifier' which is purported to improve the audio and video of MFs and F4Fs by spinning the discs whilst bathing them with 'electromagnetic beams' prior to being played. These claims have been criticised by popular s-eptic .ames Iandi.Z!3[
KeditLBatter! chargersIreju"enators

<n /##6& Hedini's +nergen8 company began distributing a line of battery charger/'rejuvenator' products&Z!4[ which he claims do two thingsA !. charge batteries using much less energy than traditional chargers& and /. restore sulfated batteries to near0new condition. <n ,ovember /##%& he began more heavily promoting these devices& claiming they have performed well. 2s of *ay /#!#& Ienaissance Mharge 77M 9+nergen8 sales arm: is still in the business of selling radiant battery chargers. The company has added 5 additional chargers to their product line including an electric vehicle charger.

KeditLRe%erences
1# MU? patent C70)70C, >edini, .ohn C#, <&nalog vector processor and method for prod cing a bina ral signal<, iss ed 1//)60C60C 2# MU? patent C0)70C7, >edini, .ohn C#, <&pparat s and method for red cing electronic rela%ation noise present information recording medi m<, iss ed 1//D601623 3# MU? patent C0D0002, >edini, .ohn C#, <&nti6cop$ s$stem<, iss ed 1/)7602617 0# MU? patent C0CC7)C, >edini, .ohn C#, <-ona ral to bina ral a dio processor<, iss ed 1/)C61162D C# M;rieg, 7ric# <7ric@s histor$ of *erpet al -otion and Free 7nerg$ -achines<# &rchived from the original on 200)60D620# http:44(eb#archive#org4(eb4200)0D200)1D314http:44(((#phact#org4e4dennis0 #html# Getrieved 200)60D62D# < D# M >edini s pports and based some of his claims on that of 1om >earden, according to <20 >edini6>earden =ears 6 Free 7nerg$ !eneration<# http:44Aohnbedini#net4Aohn304bedinibearden#html# Getrieved 201061160)# # 1his site promotes, among other things, >earden@s book of the same name#

7# MU? patent 710/D71, >edini, .ohn C#, <+evice and method of a back 7-F permanent electromagnetic motor generator<, iss ed 200D60/61/ )# MU? patent DD77730, >edini, .ohn C#, <+evice and method for p lse charging a batter$ and for driving other devices (ith a p lse<, iss ed 2000601613 /# MU? patent DC0C000, >edini, .ohn C#, <+evice and method for tili8ing a monopole motor to create back 7-F to charge batteries<, iss ed 200360060) 10# MU? patent D3/2370, >edini, .ohn C#, <+evice and method of a back 7-F permanent electromagnetic motor generator<, iss ed 200260C621 11# M<>#&#?#7#<# >edini 7lectronics, Inc## 1//7# http:44(((#bedini#com4base#htm# Getrieved 200761260C# <9hat can be said is that the s$stem ses a form of interferometr$ to fool the ear, allo(ing the listener@s right ear to hear e%cl sivel$ right channel information (hilst the left ear hears onl$ the left# 1his leaves the listener in no do bt, that (itho t headphones, C0 H8 rooms, (aveg ides or an$ other gadgetr$, he4she can perceive so nds coming from aro nd the room, and is free to (alk aro nd (ith a tr l$ balanced rendition of both speakers in his4her headspace at an$ time#< 12# M<>edini & dio ?pacial 6 online radio station page at Live3DC<# Live3DC#com# &rchived from the original on 200C60260C# http:44(eb#archive#org4(eb4200C020C120C104http:44(((#live3DC#com4station s4bedini1# Getrieved 200761260C# 13# M<Commentar$: & - rk$ Clarification<# 200060)627# http:44(((#randi#org4Ar40)2700gl ton#htmlE0# Getrieved 200)60D62D# 10# M<7nergen%, Inc# 106L ?7C filing<# 200)611610# http:44(((#otcmarkets#com4edgar4!etFilingHtmlMFilingI+ND2C10/3# Getrieved 201060D60D#

KeditLE>ternal lin*s
.ohn >edini@s personal (eb pages >#&#?#7 info and partial list of

Getrieved from <http:44en#(ikipedia#org4(iki4.ohnO>edini< Categories: Living people P 7ngineers P *se doph$sics P & dio engineering

Panacea's proposed granted non profit research and development center will have the capacity to provide study, validation and security into the following clean FREE energy research and development. The proposed Panacea institute can then begin to perform the crticially neededtask of creating security for advancing this education into the mainstrteam faculties. afe conditions where any ignorance !or worse" cannot occur.

This task is essential as the following technology is already established, the most efficient but is not internationally recognized or educated. This problem is an age old one for many inventions of this genre and needs to be bought to the attention of the general public. The principle goal of the non profit organi#ation's public service will be to provide supportive and E$%RE conditions, security, faculty submission and grant support for the following research and development. The first technology we wish to present is &ohn 'edini's systems. &ohn has open source some of his systems to demonstrate the principle of (radiant( energy !longitudinal )scalar wave" charging of batteries. &ohn 'edini has many highly efficient patents, working devices and feasible undeveloped concepts but no international recognition, mainstream public awareness, and mainstream scientific acceptance of the value of his insights.

&ohn 'edini is the founder of 'edini Electronics. &ohn is a developer of electrical amplifiers and a very vigorous FREE energy engineer. &ohn has also done research into the suppressed alternative cancer cure work of Raymond Rife. *ost of &ohn+s free energy work is originally inspired and based on the ideas of ,ikola Tesla. &ohn has built and demonstrated many advanced free energy principles. The first was completed as far back as the -.'s, however getting this type of technology known publicly or into academia has not been possible.
The /romrey $onverter by &ohn 'edini)

&ohn 'edini

&ohn has altruistically released alternative energy information into the public domain. These disclosures include the ( chool 0irl( or 0 !simplified school girl motor" and 'edini, $ole 12indow motor3 motor circuits. &ohn+s open public disclosures of the 0 concept are intended as an educational tool for the public to observe and test the effects of battery charging by his uni4ue process which has advantages over other methods.

&ohn's commercial products show an additional longer life and run time effects not seen in the conventional method of charging batteries. This technology although has been around for many years is only 5ust starting to come into public awareness. Panacea could devote a whole web site to John Bedini. &ohns own page along with technical data and e6amples of his systems can be found here7 &ohn is a very e6perienced and well)researched pioneer of alternative and suppressed free)energy devices, &ohn has had a close friendship with Tom bearden and the late freee energy inventor Edwin 8. 0ray whom inspired &ohn and shared various technical insights with him. These insights are to be seen in &ohn+s systems to this day.

9ne of &ohns *edium and :arge self running motor)energi#ers. Photo taken from H ! .

&ohn's systems and the education of them are critically neeeded to make it into the non profit organi#ations center because of conflict of interest or suppression and corporate theft. The Following 4uote is taken from &ohn's own words describing particular related suppression e6perience whilst trying to education the public in this field. ;uote) That is where the magic is, The spike is the key to the Dirac Sea that is where the negative energy pops out of, chase the spike. When I first started publishing my work in the 1 !" on different systems that did show the strange effects that we all seek to use as free energy, I made it very public. #fter a conference at the Tesla convention in 1 $% where I did get up on stage and discuss the little bo& I held in my hand, along with 'im Watson who did give the demonstration of (y machine, which is now his machine.

There were only two differences, the machine was publicly disclosed in a little booklet. )ne man was bound to be told that if he ever discussed e&actly how the machine worked his whole family would be killed, but gained *.+ million, the other man was pushed by agents to the wall by two big brutes at gun point and told you will buy gasoline the rest of your life. I was the latter. Reference to the Jim Watson machine.

&im 2atson's <=/8 'edni type converter !'ottom pic" presented at the colorado springs Tesla symposium.

When I went into a public company and was given stock for my many hard years work on a ,D sound systems and every studio in the world started using it, I was left out of the e-uation, The inventor never sells his stock it looks bad, but others got rich to never know me again, I was the latter again. When the internet became popular I was there I freely posted all my work for people to use and discover what I did. I was laughed at and was completely ignored, I.m not a writer nor have I ever been, and do not claim to be. The one gift that was given to me was the ability to see through circuits to run them in my head, to build anything I want, so I keep doing it. I do make

/(y/ information public, maybe I should not. 0ou have no Idea what could happen to you, because you have not been there, you have not had things taken from you and then the name changes hands and your item is the bad one after that. 0ou have not had people come to your shop and write detailed information and give it away without your permission, you have not had your mail opened and the check.s taken out so you would starve and loose every thing you worked for. 0ou have not been made to eat dirt yet. I 1ust watched a man in 2rance take my work and change it and call it his own, and to beat it all say it publicly. 3ut don.t worry it.s no longer mine since it is now his patent pending. )End 4uote, &ohn 'edini. *ore dislcosures of &ohn's suppression e6periences can be seen in 'y &eane *anning. "tlantis !ising, ,ovember =.. >rticle. ;uote7'ohn 3edini was roaming the /free energy/ scene in 4alifornia in the 1 !"s and early 1 $"s, collecting knowledge about medical as well as energy devices. 5e had an electronics business in Sylmar, and at home he e&perimented with windmills and other systems. The utility company ob1ected6he was hooked up to their power lines and if his system were to backfeed, it could e&tinguish the lights in the neighborhood. 5e disagreed. #s he tells it, the officials. final word was /we think you.re stealing power/ and they took their meter off the building. 5owever, his lights were still on at night, because of his energy inventions, he tells me. 2inally they struck a deal6he would have his power meter back but would pay a high fee for the service. The power company almost took away their hookup to his shop, but it was in an industrial area and they would have had to remove a three7phase transformer and therefore deprive the other businesses of power. /They found that when they switched off all the power in the shop nothing 8electrical9 was being drawn, but the machines kept running./ 5e published instructions for an energy device which 'im Watson of 4olorado Springs then built6large7scale with a heavy flywheel. Watson demonstrated it at the 1 $% 3icentennial symposium celebrating :ikola Tesla.s arrival in the ;S#. # nd $uote. &ohn can provide tuition into this uni4ue education of how his systems work. ince we are dealing with a field of parameters and technical operation that mainstream science has no record, and or perception of, currently, they are completely unaware of &ohns systems.

&ohn's device Photos taken from Here

>bstract7 ;uote &ohn ) this motor runs on two watts and keeps all the secondary batteries charged, <self sustaining= the 4apacitors are 1 farad each, three in series for a total of ,,,,""" uf they are about * volts over the batteries the battery impedance is about ."""*, )hms it.s -uiet a bit when these are pulsed)End 4uote

&ohn's device Photos taken from Here

%t took many years for John Bedini to develop away from the political and economic limitations that are related to this technology, these same pre&udices are also imposed by mainstream faculty scientists today.

"lso due to the comple'ity and technical nature of John(s systems, his disclosures put him in a vulnerable position where people with less e'perience into his principles, felt that they needed to elevate themselves by defaming John, and, vent their frustration on him. ?espite this &ohn and has paried together with Tom 'earden and have both recently released a book entitled )ree energy *eneration. ;uote from the web page7Want to build a >adiant ?nergy battery charger@ Want to build a >adiant ?nergy battery charger@ Then this is the book for you 7 as 2ree ?nergy Aeneration contains the 1"" plus page Brovisional Batent #pplication that was originally filed in *""% by 'ohn 3edini and Tom 3earden, which they have now generously placed in the public domain. This treatise holds nothing back, and includes virtually all they collectively know about negative energy. Included are circuit diagrams, oscilloscope traces, the worksC #nd as a bonus, 2ree ?nergy Aeneration also contains the re7issue of 'ohn 3edini.s classic 1 $% book 7 3edini.s 2ree ?nergy Aenerator, a / how7to/ book about building a proven free energy generator, complete with circuit and parts list. This marked one of Tom 3earden and 'ohn 3edini.s first co7 operative ventures, over *" years ago. The whole book is generously illustrated with color photographs of 'ohn and Tom taken in the 3edini lab over the *" years, and the /classic/ 1 $% 3edini monograph is printed on commemorative anti-ued paper. 2ree ?nergy Aeneration is the perfect /practical/ companion to Tom 3earden.s more theoretical ?nergy from the Dacuum. 7End 4uote &ohn and Tom have also collaborated together in the documentary series (energy from the vacuum( to demonstrate an in)depth look on film at the errors and omissions in today's electrical physics, and the inventors !and their devices" who have e6ploited these gaping holes and pioneer the production of free electrical energy from the infinite vacuum all around us.

+ink

The Bottom line is Johns systems work and John is a humanitarian. &ohn has recently a commercial solid state radiant energy charger. This is F>R from the potential that &ohns system have. &ohn's systems as shown in the documentary (energy from the vacuum( and can be developed into a self running home power system.&ohn has also e6perienced what appears to be distortion by deliberate suppression from ,yth busters. This show appears to have intentionally misrepresented the The 2astson and 'edini system. The discovery channels *yth busters show covered the 'edini device, how ever the show left out E E,T@>: replication details needed for the system to function normally.

Taken form the show which aired on the discovery chanel

>bove you can see *yth busters (describing( their construction of the 'edini process. Aou can see that their is e6clusion of the magnets on the rotor. Thats rightB they left out magnets on the rotorB 2hat is even more suspicious is that there was no oppertunity for &ohn orf any body to contact them about this. Therfore the show refuses to address these 1left out3 construction details which are clearly visible on the patent and internet disclosures.
Panacea#B-.") /ideo production e'plaining the issue 0ou#Tube link 0ou tube # John addressing this issue

This incident appears to be a deliberate error given the patent and internet information. @n addition, further Cdis info+ regarding &ohn+s technology has surfaced. $ertain individuals have published negative and distracting public opinions of &ohn+s system on the internet. Two individuals, named Eric /rieg and &ames Randi have done this despite having ,E8ER empirically investigated the 'edini effect personally. @E )never built and disproved or proved it for them self+s personally. Eric /rieg and &ames Randi are avid skeptics of &ohn+s spiritD the following 4uote taken a fictional story sums up their reaction to this perfectly.

'I'm a skeptic.' 'No, you're only incredulous, a doubter, and that's different.' - mberto !co, "oucault's #endulum Eric and &ames may have been right on a number of things they have covered in the past, but it is 12 scientific to not reproduce some thing and claim it as scientifically relevant or 3dis #proven4. >ny thing else does not 4ualify for scientific scrutiny. @f Eric and Randi cannot build a 'edini device, then they are in no way a genuine authority on the science involved, and are deluding themselves and the people who take them seriously.> challenge is thus put forth dated =..to *yth busters, Eric and &ames to reproduce the device EE>$T:A as it is described on the 'edini patent and prove it wrong. Enough said.

9ne of &ohn's patents featured on his web site

'elow is an article showing a school girl+s successful replication of the 'edini device. This replication also won her first pri#e at her science fair pro5ect !which says allot for *yth busters".

0ou cant e'pect some ones education to flourish in an environment where the integrity of the research is not nurtured. ?espite this on going interference as mentioned previously &ohn has been able to put commercial solid state !no moving parts" (radiant energy( and solar amplifier chargers on the market. These products are a new discovery in energy transformaiton and power engieering principles.At there is no faculty awareness of this new power generation which is far more efficienct than conventional methods.

r#charge

&onh's chargers are critically needed to improve and preserve the life of batteries, not to mention are practical for use in electric car applicaitons. The 'edini process is related to methods described in ,ikola Tesla's patents. @n addition, the open source internet communities replicated &ohn+s systems, and have made variants of them towards clean energy production."n estimated total of at least 5666 engineers are registered on the internet forums who all freely share their tests results. Panacea's open source engineers have also helped to reproduce this technology and assist educating the public.Together with the internet based 0 group we have included these findings for all to follow and learn. 9pen source engineer's &eff !'it's)n)'ytes on the forum's" and Rick Friedrich have been very consistent in advancing the open source side of &ohn's technology towards free energy generation. This is needed to ensure competition which creates affordable prices in kits and also security 7public knowledge8 of the technology. They are working on 2o budget.

&eff !:eft" and Rick !$enter" ne6t to the 'edini <. coil energi#er

&eff has put the all money up front to test an 9PE, 'edini <. coil creation.

9%R$E self running

creen shot taken from the video

@n the following 9elf !unning Bedini :6 .oiler# *rid Tie /ideo &eff is illustrating the 0rid Tie !power back into the house" from the <. $oiler.

This has significant ramifications to advance education. 0ou can track the research and development progress of this work in the Bedini :6#coil energetic forum thread. The following are educational resources covering the open source side of the technology.
Bedini ,onopole ,echanical -scillator 99* nergizer /ideo Presentation "ion alchemy(s educational presentation

The open source Bedini 9* !school girl" groups are also dedicated to advancing education and the technology. The enigneers in this group work on their own budget need resources and further support.Their colective goal is to find similarities between ,ikola Tesla's technology and &ohn's methods )>nd to release them for all. Further replications.

Replication of the 'ediniF$ole motor

?escription7 2inal video, ); motor, battery in central node slowly charges while motor runs. It works, does what it was designed to do. Broves a 3ediniE4ole type motor with correct electronic package can run in a steady ;nity or slightly ); state. (ost likely is an e&tension of Tom 3earden.s theories. Where to go from here is irrelivant to me. This was 1ust pure science and technology and reverse engineering for me.....I saw a problem, I found a solution.Thats what I do for fun. Fife is good7 !eferance &ohn states)In the motor you reproduced your efficiency is around . but the $%# is o&er '(() that is why the /4#B charges/ up. The ne&t problem is that your hall device can not work correct, because of the >adiant spike, if you walk away the 5all will soon burn out and that part will hinder your performance.The 8SA9 Aroup needs to understand what they are building,

they are building a machine that takes advantage of a simple trigger system, you must supply the trigger to cause the effect to happen. It is that trigger that causes things to happen, it.s known as a sharp gradient.*harp gradients cause normal !+ systems to do real funny things since it is not in the normal te,t.2or e&ample the correct sharp pulse can trigger a battery to recharge itself, it can cause a capacitor to recharge itself and so on.)End This replication also triggered suppression attempts on &ohn, this was enacted through intimidation on &ohn. &ohn states)I can tell you one thing that I have got my ass beat on the phone over this, I got all kinds of funny e7mails to where I had to lock that 0ahoo Aroup up and ask for names. 5ow about getting phone calls in the middle of the night, and they do not talk. 0es this has happened to me before and I can fi& the problem but now I must watch my back. :ot only is (ike gone from the group, but my name was on everything along with (r. 4oles, but he is dead. !nough said, god.s speed to all of you before it.s to late. The SB))GS are out and right here.)end &ohn has been sub5ected to suppression for years) Within a few weeks, 3edini was visited by two thugs who were definitely unfriendly toward his efforts to unhook from today.s power structures. They had the appearance of body7builders who had 1ust stepped out of a gymnasium, and pushed him against his shop wall while saying in a threatening manner that they e&pect he will continue to use gasoline. 5e laughs shortly while recalling the incident, but evidently knew they were serious. !eference This is in no way to be tolerated, and left %, addresssed will not advance the faculty and public acceptance of &ohn's and others peoples alternative energy systems. The proposed granted Panacea research and development center can $uell these conditions and provide public accessible faculty study conditions. These replications prove many things, one that there is a need to upgrade faculties theories on energy, also that there is still suppression to this day of 5ohns systems. ,o where in universities faculties is there power management information or awareness of the effect being produced by this device. Panacea has also successfully reproduced some of &ohn 'edini's technology.
Panacea Bedini )an kit ,otor charging two batteries

This version of the technology is a 'edini (fan kit( and was put together by open source engineer Rick. /its for this device can be found H ! .

Panacea's replication of Rick's 'edini Fan kit motor.

Panacea has also installed this technology on a farm. The following is a segment taken from The Panacea )arm conversion. Panacea has also completed a "%- Bedini +ight )an ; .harger. Full replication detail's are available on the Panacea on)line university. &ohn's open source technology disclosures have already produced a multi coil system which is capable of powering a house and out putting <./2.

&ohn 'edini's *ulti coil house power system

This like the solid state version would be the most efficient solar system in the world. Rick Fredrick has begun to make educational kits showing this multi coil system. These have been made available on his web site.

Rick's G pole *onopole multi coil system

This is no where near &ohn's technology potential for free energy home power systems. &ohn has a self running device and has had since <H-.B. Iowever more suppression has happened7 The Gromrey 4onverter. 8replication based on >aymond Gromrey.s ;S Batent H,,,!%,,!I9 'ohn 3edini e&plains in the full length DDD everything you ever wanted to know about this proven overunity generator. #nd demonstrates it on the bench. #lso included is archival footage of the one hour 3ill 'enkins Town 5all (eeting in Fos #ngeles in 1 $% in which 'ohn 3edini unveils it for the first time to the public.

&ohn pictured ne6t to the The /romrey $onverter.

Well, 'ohn.s manufacturing and production team was rapidly infiltrated and destroyed, and (.I.T. bought up the last remaining twelve operational units from 'ohn, never to see the light of day again, so you can draw your own conclusions.Well, here it is, 'ohn 3edini.s legendary JA7field generatorK from the early 1 $"s in all its glory running on the bench and putting out more power than 'ohn is putting in.#nd e1ecting a stream of freeLing cold air from its interior, where one would J normallyK e&pect heat would be produced and dissipated.In this DDD 'ohn 3edini, painstakingly traces the JA7field generator.sK pedigree and history all the way back to the late Brofessor >aymond Gromrey, and 'ohn then presents the theory, the circuit diagram, what to do, and what not to do, to build one that works. Watch, too, how 'ohn shows the motor running under load with the circuit only completed by a strand of wire the diameter of a human hair an impossibility with conventional ?( energy.2or the practically minded, this DDD is all anyone could ask for if one was contemplating building an overunity electrical motor.'ohn.s manufacturing and production team was rapidly infiltrated and destroyed, and (.I.T. bought up the last remaining twelve operational units from 'ohn, never to see the light of day again, so you can draw your own conclusions.#lso included is the archival footage from the celebrated 1 $% JTown 5all (eetingK with 3ill 'enkins, in which 'ohn springs this technology on an unsuspecting world. nergy )rom the /acuum
Trailer

Recently &ohn has disclosed a Tesla witch olar $harger, this can be used on the motors also. John states <=> watts in and :?@ out<.

Tesla

witch

olar $harger from Energe6

Iowever &ohn has since taken down these video's showing the power out put capacity for fear of intimidation or worse. &ohn has shown that the Tesla witch olar $hargers can put out a lot more power then the commercial available versions, but has told the world that he purposely clamps down their output, which could be (massive(. 5ohn states /I don.t dare turn it up./ >lready we have seen &ohn take his video's down. 2ith out secure research conditions such as those proposed by Panacea in our non profit research center, &ohn has no safety. )Tesla 9witch 9olar .harger at Bedini conference The olar amplifier is still ahead of its time and will replace a charge controller and increase the available power from your panel!s" and deliver a radiant charge to your battery that will increase the available charge capacity of your battery and e'tend the battery(s life. This method of power ",P+%)%."%T-2 makes it the most efficient solar charger in the world, yet this engineering principle 7like the battery chargers8 is not known conventional or taught at the faculty level.

&ohn 'edini's 9olar "mplifier

Panacea is intent on supporting &ohn , Rick and &ohn kroom who all have worked together to help get this technology known. 9olar amplifiers and the battery chargers are available from Panacea. Ae intend to put all proceeds back into helping advance the B1."T%-2 and reducing pollution #.contact Panacea. Panacea has tested this uni4ue electrochemical way of using the sun to revive, preserve and charge lead acid batteries. Panacea was able to bring back many (dead( lead acid batteries by using this charger. ,o other solar charger in the world is capable of doing this.

Panacea's

olar amplifer test )Reviving and charging a (dead( lead acid battery.

&ohn 'edini has also done Research and development into curing diseaseC Muote7Then came the day when we had ," doctors in the room with us. We prepared the slide, put it under the microscope and put it up on a view screen so all could see. )ne push of the button on the machine, and 3#:A, the one cell animal was dead. #ll the doctors 1ust went nuts. 3ut the comments were very discouraging, /W? WIFF :?D?> T#FG #3);T T5IS, W? WIFF F))S? );> ')3S, T5? 2D# WIFF >;: ;S );T )2 T)W:, W? WIFF F)S? ?D?>0T5I:A./ The main ob1ection was that everything I did with the circuits was potted. 4rane was the first to agree with all of them about this, saying there was something hidden in there, arguing, /We can.t see it so we don.t know if it works./ I answered that we must protect what we have done so no one can change anything in the circuits. I kept very detailed notes as I went along on the circuits. #t first they were very simple waves of different fre-uencies. #s time went by, the waves got more comple&.7?nd -uote The proposed granted 2-2 P!-)%T Panacea research and development center is inteneded to provide secuirty and support for John(s and others technology which face the same conditions. This centralized hub is needed to safely present and educate their systems away from theft , ridicule and or worse. ?espite the &ohn and the 'edini engineers communities having working available devices and R and ? potential, they have no faculty recognition or support. This research re$uires endorsement and sponsorship errect 9") conditions for John to disclose more. John(s contributions can be secure and progress in real time in a 9") grant backed research and development centre environment specific for this task. %f you(re a member of the public or scientific group which can aid in grants for the proposed granted non profit centre or help +utec please contact Panacea.
.lick here

to access Panacea's online faculty courses into 'edini's systems. The courese is listed under (&ohn 'edini technology(. chuaberger's @mplosion Technology.

The ne6t section will profile 8iktor

Technical support forum(s

Bedini ,onopole nergetic forum %mhotepslabs -verunity.com

Teep forum

Tom Hearden answers .erry Fec-er

.erry& < only have time every so many wee-s to try to answer such 1uestions. <'ll ta-e some time to try to give you a complete answer& but do not wish to enter into protracted discussions etc. <'m on a very reduced schedule anyway& because of the illness& and so only have a little time to spare at infre1uent intervals. Jou will never have the answer to the true negative resistor problem or understand it& until you read the physics literature and study something beside standard classical electrodynamics and electrical engineering. Those disciplines and models completely forbid any MD3a!.# system& and any true negative resistor is a MD3 B infinity system. )D ?>2T *Q)T H+ M>2,G+F DI *DF<(<+F <, T>D)+ +* 2,F ++ *DF+7)& <( D,+ <) TD +4+, >24+ 2 MD3a!.# )J)T+* 2T 277= 2nyone who is not struggling with that problem& has no business calling himself in the 'free energy field'. >e's not. >e's automatically in the '?ell& it's not in conventional ++& so < can't understand it' field. ++ is based on a very archaic and seriously flawed +* model that does not permit MD3a!.# circuits and systems. *uch better electrodynamics models have long been available in particle physics 00 for the simple reason that the standard ++ does not ade1uately describe nature. The answer to many of your 1uestions and speculations are already there in particle physics& and have been for a long time. Hut one has to read the physics literature. )adly& most of the 'free energy' community will not read the literature& will not go loo- up and read a cited reference or 1uotation& etc. and try to understand it. )o there e8ists a 'mindset' in the free energy community& which largely regurgitates classical electrodynamics and standard electrical engineering& HDT> *DF+7) of which specifically prohibit MD3a!.# +* systems in the first place! 2s an e8ample& to do MD3a!.# in an +* circuit& that circuit has to violate the second law of thermodynamics. ?here is the discussion in the 'free energy' community about that& and how to do it= (urther& it has to violate the standard closed0current0loop circuit& and it has to violate the arbitrary 7orent; symmetrical regauging of the *a8well0>eaviside e1uations. ?here are the fruitful discussions of the methods for doing those two things=

?ell& most do not 7< + such areas. )orry& but those are the areas that one must grapple with& if one wishes to grapple with overunity processes and mechanisms. <f the gold is on the right side of the fence and one persists in loo-ing only on the left side& one should not be surprised that he never finds the gold. ?e have to ta-e physics as it comes on its own terms. ?e simply cannot dictate what the physics 'ought to be'& but only try to find out 'what it is'. Dne can point out answers and the e8act citations from physics& and we've done that in spades. Then if the community still will not deviate from M+* and ++& and will not discuss the technical re1uirements for a MD3a!.# system& then all further discussions with the community are useless. Jet strangely& those who have never even seen an overunity system or circuit& much less tested one& seem to assume that they already completely understand the entire field that is not yet even a field. *erely because they understand M+* or electrical engineering! ?hen < wrote the paper on how Hedini is able to generate a true negative resistor at the boundary 9inner surface of the plates: inside a battery& for the conference that year in Iussia& < specifically as-ed the Iussian scientists to first subject the paper and its e8planation to rigorous analysis& to find if there were any flaws. 2fter that refereeing chec- was performed by some e8cellent Iussian scientists& the answer came bac- that the paper was o-ay and would stand up& and was recommended for publication. ?hereupon < submitted the paper to them for presentation in absentia& and for publication in the proceedings. Jou are aware& < thin-& that there is no real contiguous closed electron current loop in a battery powered circuit& contrary to the standard circuit diagram. <nstead& there are two very different current half0loopsA 9!: the ion current between the plates& completely internal to the battery& and 9/: the electron current half loop& from the outside of one plate through the e8ternal circuit to the outside of the other plate. The mass per unit charge of the lead ions in a battery is enormously greater 9several hundred thousand times greater: than the mass per unit charge of the electrons. )o the electrons respond very much faster than the sluggish ions. +rgo& one can readily dephase the two currents& because of the sluggishness of the ions compared to the rapidity of the electrons. 3iece of ca-e& with the proper timing. ,ow to pauseA suppose you set a 'scalar' potential upon the middle of a transmission line. <t doesn't sit there li-e a 'scalar' entity at all!

<nstead& it ta-es off in both directions simultaneously& li-e two scalded hogs& nearly at the speed of light. <t potentiali;es the charges in one direction almost instantly and it also potentiali;es the charge in the other direction almost instantly. 37+2)+ ,DT+ T>2T T>+ M>2IG+) TD T>+ 7+(T >24+ 2 (DIM+ TD T>+ 7+(T MI+2T+F D, T>+*& 2,F T>+ M>2IG+) TD T>+ I<G>T >24+ 2 (DIM+ TD T>+ I<G>T MI+2T+F D, T>+*. <f you catch the ions in the charging mode& you can thus reverse the electron current in the e8ternal circuit with overpotentiali;ed electrons& while simultaneously overpotentiali;ing the ions in charging mode. This means that e8cess energy is delivered to powering the e8ternal circuit& while e8cess energy is simultaneously delivered to the ions in charging mode. <t's as simple as that. *icrowave switching engineer Hill ,elson and engineer Ion Mole had absolutely no difficulty in reproducing the Hedini process in the !"%#s. ,either did .im ?atson& who later developed and demonstrated an % ? device. ,ow suppose you suddenly place a potential on the surface of the plates 9between the two plates: of a battery. That potential ta-es off li-e a scalded hog in both directions. <t flows across the ions in the battery between the plates in one direction& and simultaneously it flows out into the e8ternal circuits to 'push the charges' in the other direction. <n short& if you time things correctly& you can F+3>2)+ and F+MDQ37+ the two currents in the battery powered system& simultaneously adding potential energy to both of them& 'for free'. Jou can add potential to HDT> the ions and the electrons. The ions can be moving bac-ward in charging mode& while the electrons will be driven in the opposite direction in the e8ternal circuit 000 in powering direction. Hefore one gets bent out of shape about the potential being regauging and all that& and free additional potential energy and all that& one should go loo- up what the 'gauge freedom' a8iom of 1uantum field theory means. 2ll electrodynamicists 000 and even the electrical engineers 000 assume that the potential energy of any *a8wellian system can be freely changed at will. >owever& they usually assume you will be a gentleman and do it twice simultaneously& and will also do it just e8actly so that the two new free +* forces produced in the system are e1ual and opposite. ?ell& that assumes that you ta-e in free e8cess potential energy to the system& but precisely loc- it up so that it cannot translate electrons and therefore push current and do wor- in an e8ternal load. >owever& it continuously performs what is called 'internal wor-' in the system& in opposing directions but e1ual

magnitude. That wor- continually forms and maintains e8cess 'stress energy' in the system& and that is all. )o the first problem for a MD3a!.# system is how to brea- up that 'stress energy only' assumption. .ohn's way is one way. >e actually 'splits' the potential into two directional fields 9which it isN see ?hitta-er !"#3& cited in numerous of my papers:& one going in one direction to push the ions in charging mode& and the other going in the other direction out into the e8ternal circuit to push electrons in powering mode. That's about as simple as it can be e8plained. 2t that point& one either understands it or one doesn't. 2lso& bear in mind that from any non;ero scalar potential phi& regardless of how small in magnitude& you can collect as much energy as you wish& if you just have enough charge available to intercept it. That's the simple e1uation ? B 9phi:1& where ? is the amount of energy collected in joules from potential phi& by charges 1 in coulombs. (or a given phi and a desired ?& just include the necessary 1. 2 potential is a set of bidirectional rivers of flowing energy& as proven by ?hitta-er in !"#3. ?e do not have to I+3ID4+ that at allN it's already well -nown and accepted by every electrodynamicist worth his salt. 2ny potential is automatically a true negative resistor& since it is a free harmonic set of bidirectional flows of +* energy 9due to its dipolarity and the bro-en symmetry of sameN it ta-es the energy right out of the vacuum via the bro-en symmetry of the source charge or dipolarity:. >ence you can collect as much energy from it as you wish& from its 'flowing rivers of energy'& if you arrange for enough charges 9buc-ets: to collect it 9to collect the water:. ,othing says you have to use just one -ind of charge 9the electron:. Jou can use 00 as Hedini does 00 both the ions between the plates and the electrons in the e8ternal circuit. 2nd you can use them both& and potentiali;e them both simultaneously with the same potential. >D? *QM> +LM+)) +,+IGJ JDQ M2TM> <, HDT> F<I+MT<D,) F+3+,F) )D7+7J D, T>+ *2G,<TQF+ D( T>+ 3>< 2,F T>+ *2G,<TQF+ D( T>+ O's. There's no mystery as to how he ma-es a negative resistor& because 2,J 2,F +4+IJ F<3D72I<TJ 2,F 3DT+,T<27 2I+ 27I+2FJ TIQ+ ,+G2T<4+ I+)<)TDI). 2s is every charge. The energy flows are coming freely from the vacuum& via the proven 9in particle physics& ,DT in ++: bro-en symmetry of the source charge and source dipole. Iemember& the first re1uirement for an overunity system

or true negative resistor is TD G+T DQT D( M72))<M27 +7+MTIDFJ,2*<M) 2,F +7+MTI<M27 +,G<,++I<,G. <f one cannot thin- outside those bo8es& one will never get or understand overunity& because <T <) MD*37+T+7J DQT)<F+ T>D)+ T?D HDL+). +very charge in the universe is already a true negative resistor of the purest and most definitive 9and easily demonstrated e8perimentally: -ind. <t freely absorbs virtual photons from the seething vacuum& transduces that into DH)+I42H7+ 9real& detectable& usable: photons& and pours them out in all directions in 30space at the speed of light. Dne doesn't have to reprove thatN it's been proven in physics since !"56. Jou want to ma-e a true *2MID)MD3<M negative resistor for peanuts= .ust lay a charged capacitor on a permanent magnet so that the + field of the cap is at right angles to the >0field of the magnet. That optimi;es +L>& which is the e8pression for the 3oynting energy flow ) B f9+L>:. That silly thing sits there and steadily pours out real observable usable +* energy +L> at the speed of light& with no DH)+I42H7+ electromagnetic energy input into it. The fact that it is a continuous flow of energy is usually just 'mumbled away'N e.g.& with some version of this 1uotationA 'Z3oynting's result[ implies that a charged capacitor in a constant magnetic field which is not parallel to the electric field is the seat of energy flows even though all macroscopic phenomena are static.' Z.ed S. Huchwald& (rom *a8well to *icrophysics& Qniversity of Mhicago 3ress& Mhicago and 7ondon& !"%5& p. 44.[ Hefore one falls for that 'static' nonsense& one must understand what 'static' really is. That's e8pressed beautifully by 4an (landern& as followsA 'To retain causality& we must distinguish two distinct meanings of the term 'static'. Dne meaning is unchanging in the sense of no moving parts. The other meaning is sameness from moment to moment by continual replacement of all moving parts. ?e can visuali;e this difference by thin-ing of a waterfall. 2 fro;en waterfall is static in the first sense& and a flowing waterfall is static in the second sense. Hoth are essentially the same at every moment& yet the latter has moving parts capable of transferring momentum& and is made of entities that propagate. ZTom 4an (landern& 'The speed of gravity 0 ?hat the e8periments say&' 3hysics 7etters 2& 4ol. /5#& Fec. /!& !""%& p.%0". [ (rom the ?hitta-er papers of !"#3 and !"#4& we have -nown for just about a century that all static +* fields and potentials are in fact 'static' fields of 4an (landern's second -ind 000 analogous to an unfro;en waterfall. There is a continuous bidirectional movement of an internal +* structure of

longitudinal waves inside 9and comprising: all +* fields and potentials. )o the 'static envelope' of the field e8ists& but the 'inside' components are in violent change and motion& in HDT> directions. 2gain& that's been -nown and in the literature since !"#3. Hut that does not appear in the hoary old seriously flawed electrical engineering& which continues to try to consider the static potential and static field as a 'fro;en waterfall' analogy. ,either does the solution for the source of the input energy to the source charge& nor the form of that energy input& appear in the M+* and ++ models. The M+* and ++ models do not even model the vacuum flu8 e8change with the charge& much less a bro-en symmetry in that e8change. )o they do not even model what powers every electrical circuit. 3eriod. ,ever have. <f one wishes to tangle with true negative resistance& then one should just try to answer 9in classical +* only& such as electrical engineering: the 1uestion of from where and how a given charge gets the +* energy that it continuously pours out& establishing its fields and potentials and their energy across the universe at the speed of light. <f one cannot answer that 1uestion in classical +* and electrical engineering& one will then have to go read some physics& because it's been answered for 45 years in particle physics& and a ,obel 3ri;e was awarded to 7ee and Jang in !"56 for their having predicted the basis for that solution. Hro-en symmetry was such a tremendous revolution to all of physics that the ,obel Mommittee moved with unprecedented speed in awarding that ,obel 3ri;e to 7ee and Jang. They strongly predicted it in !"5$0early !"56& and ?u and her colleagues proved it e8perimentally in early !"56. The ,obel 3ri;e was then awarded to 7ee and Jang in that same year& in Fec. !"56 00 a nearly unprecedented action. <t would be nice if the electrical engineering departments would wal- across the campus to the particle physics departments& and find out just what bro-en symmetry means for the source charge and the source dipole. 4oila! )uddenly they would find out what actually powers every +* circuit and system& and that the energy 000 all of it& every joule of it 00 comes from the seething vacuum via the asymmetry of the source charge or dipole. They haven't seemed to be able to do that arduous little wal- across the campus tas- in 45 years now. 2nd they have not changed their model to include the active vacuum and the bro-en symmetry in the vacuum e8change with the charge and the dipole.

<f one cannot solve the source charge problem and present that solution 9as M+* and ++ cannot do:& then one is guilty of implicitly assuming that every charge in the universe is a perpetual motion machine& freely creating energy from nothing. That is precisely the case for every electrical engineering department& professor& and te8tboo- today& and it always has been. <t is 1uite humorous 00 and downright eerie 00 that the very fellows so critical of the overunity researchers as a 'bunch of perpetual motion nuts' also implicitly assume& albeit unwittingly& that every charge in the universe is a perpetual motion machine& freely and continuously creating energy out of nothing. 3oetic justice. (urther& the charge e8hibits giant& continuously increasing negentropy& because the energy it continuously pours out at a steady and unwavering rate is not disordered but perfectly ordered. 2t a given radial distance from the source charge& the associated field has a specific value and direction& the associated static potential has a specific value& and the associated vector potential has a specific value and direction& deterministically and perfectly ordered. ?ell& the very notion of entropy always had a serious flaw anyway. <t pre0assumes that a negentropic operation at least e1ual to whatever the entropy is& must have first occurred. Dtherwise there could have been no order in the first place& to )QH)+OQ+,T7J disorder. 2nd the solution to the source charge problem provides the answer of where all that negentropy first comes from& to continuously produce the negentropy 9order: that is later disordered in entropic processes. )o the mere e8istence of electrodynamics and its giant negentropy and increasing order of the fields and potentials being poured out of the source charges destroys any notion of absoluteness in the second law of thermodynamics 9the law of continual increase in disorder& or continuously increasing entropy:. <t has long been recogni;ed that the second law 9which is based on statistical mechanics: does not apply to the single ion& charged particle& atom& molecule& or group of molecules. 2t the microscopic level& all reactions are reversible because the e1uations are reversible. )o things can run bac-wards as well as forward at the microscopic level& which is a form of time0reversal. <n a 'running bac-wards' situation& if macroscopic& then an ordinary resistor would act as a true negative resistor 9and so it does& if you feed it negative energy which is time0reversed energy:. *y new

boo-& just coming off the presses& uses that fact to e8plain cold fusion& and we give the specific reaction e1uations producing the e8cess deuterium& tritium& and alpha particles 000 as well as e8plaining the strange and anomalous instrumental problems encountered for some years in rigorous electrolyte e8periments at Q.). ,aval research facilities at Mhina 7a-e. Hut it has also long been accepted somewhat dogmatically that& well& the second law does still irrevocably apply to *2MID)MD3<M phenomena and si;e. )ome things recently have happened to upset or 'bother' even that standard answer. (irst& Fenis +vans et al. of the ,ational 2ustralian Qniversity have rigorously proven that& contrary to previous assumptions& reactions can 'run bac-wards' at up to micron 9colloidal: scale& and for up to T?D )+MD,F). ,ow that's within easy switching range for modern circuits and processes. )o all of a sudden it becomes important. The nanobots being widely developed just now in nanotechnology a close to molecular si;e will thus e8perience abrupt periods of 'running bac-wards' and so they will not wor- at all in the same manner as their much larger robots. The reference on the +vans wor- is G. *. ?ang& +. *. )evic-& +mil *ittag& Febra .. )earles& and Fenis .. +vans& '+8perimental Femonstration of 4iolations of the )econd 7aw of Thermodynamics for )mall )ystems and )hort Time )cales&' 3hys. Iev. 7ett.& %"95:& /" .uly /##/& #5#$#!. 2 good article to read on what it all means& is )teven . Hlau& 'The Qnusual Thermodynamics of *icroscopic )ystems&' 3hysics Today& 559":& )ep. /##/& p. !"0/!. There are other comments on the +vans et al. wor-N you can ta-e your choice based on the smugness and dogma used in the comments. The individual charged particle& being microscopic 9including even an ion in a solution: comes under the reversible criterion and therefore is appreciably 'immune' to the second law. )o one is not too disconcerted to find it 'running bac-wards' and pouring out real energy& at last for a short time. <n short& one is not surprised that it produces giant negentropy& (DI 2 )>DIT T<*+. ?hat is surprising 9and bewildering to classical +* and to the classical thermodynamicists: is that the charge produces negentropy MD,T<,QDQ)7J& for any length of time. )o it produces continuously increasing ,+G+,TID3J. There are other areas that are also -nown and recogni;ed to violate thermodynamics& including in the large macroscopic realm. )everal of these are listed on p. 45" of Filip ondepudi and <lya 3rigogine& *odern ThermodynamicsA (rom >eat +ngines to Fissipative )tructures& ?iley& !""%& corrected printing in !""". Ouoting p. 45"A ')ome of these areas are 9!:

'... rarefied media& where the idea of local e1uilibrium fails. The average energy at each point depends on the temperature at the boundaries. <mportant astrophysical situations belong to this category.' 9/: '...strong gradients& where we e8pect the failure of linear laws such as the (ourier law for heat conduction. ,ot much is -nown either e8perimentally or theoretically. 2ttempts to introduce such nonlinear outcomes ... have led to 'e8tended thermodynamics' .' 93: '...memory effects which appear for long times 9as compared to characteristic rela8ation times:. ...non0e1uilibrium processes may have 'long time0tails'...'. (orefront scientists are attempting to e8tend thermodynamics at present& to include 9hopefully: some -ind of e8planation for these areas. Hut what is important is that the energy continuously poured out by every magnetic or electrical charge 9as a true negative resistor& e8tracting unusable energy from the vacuum and pouring it out in usable +* form: forms perfect order& perfectly correlated to that charge& to any macroscopic si;e one wishes. .ust pic- a si;e and wait long enough for the speed of light to reach that radial distance& and you will have a volume of that radius that has been filled with perfectly ordered +* energy from that source charge. The original charges in original matter in the universe have been doing that for !4 billion years& and they are still going. 2nd their perfectly ordered fields and potentials reach across the entire observable universe. )o every part of electrodynamics 000 the source charge& the field& the potential& and every joule of +* energy in every +* field and potential& whether in space or in matter 000 is in total violation of the second law of thermodynamics& and TD 2,J *2MID)MD3<M )<S+ 7+4+7 D,+ ?<)>+)& <,M7QF<,G 2MID)) T>+ +,T<I+ Q,<4+I)+ when one accounts the perfect and continually increasing order of the fields and potentials and their energy. )o there you have your true negative resistor 9not to be confused with the silly tunnel diode& which 'puts some energy bac- to the circuit power source in reverse against the voltage' while eating lots more energy from the power source as wor- performed to allow it to be done: in every charge in the universe. 2nd all +* energy 00 in every field& potential& and circuit and system 000 comes directly from the vacuum& via the bro-en symmetry of the source charge. Fon't underrate the importance of the source charge problem. +ither one has to have a solution to that problem& or else one must surrender the conservation of energy law in its entirety& since it is totally falsified by

every charge in the universe unless the source charge solution from particle physics is included in one's model. (or the ++ model and M+*& that would re1uire drastic surgery and e8tension of the models. 2ctually& much better systems of electrodynamics are already created and available in particle physics. 2s we said& classical electrodynamics and electrical engineering do not include the active vacuum in their model& nor therefore the bro-en symmetry in the e8change between the active vacuum and every charge and dipole in the circuit. )ince those models do not include the actual source of any or all the +* energy in a circuit or system& then those models do not include what powers an electrical circuit or system 9some of that very energy that is e8tracted from the vacuum via the source charge's bro-en symmetry:. That was all e8cusable until !"56. Today it is ine8cusable& once one points out the solution sitting there in particle physics. 2nd if you really wish to get at this matter of energy flow really well& then read the original papers of >eaviside and 3oynting& who independently and simultaneously in the !%%#s discovered the propagation of +* energy in space& after *a8well was already dead. Hefore that& the concept did not even appear in physics. The primary energy flow connected with a circuit actually flows outside the conductors& in the e8ternal space. 2 tiny bit of it 9the 3oynting component: is diverged into the circuit conductors to power the electrons. The huge remainder 9the >eaviside nondiverged energy flow component& which is in circulation form: is not diverged into the circuit at all& but is just wasted and ignored. 7orent; in the !%"#s stated that& well& it has no physical significance 9because it does not do anything:& so he originated a clever little integration tric- to get rid of all accountability of it. The abandoned and unaccounted >eaviside component may have a magnitude up to a trillion times or more& of the magnitude of the 3oynting component. < am wor-ing on a paper that points out some very startling and completely une8pected things that are indeed 'done' by that long neglected >eaviside component. <t plays a major role in the appearance of the various ice ages upon the +arth& and creates the e8cess gravity that is holding the arms of the spiral gala8ies intact 9>eaviside himself recogni;ed the gravitational implications of his e8tra component& and dealt with it in his notes& but did not live to publish it. The notes were found in !"56 9curious coincidence!: and published by one of the learned societies. <f applied properly& the >eaviside component also plays the major role in producing the mysterious antigravity that is accelerating the e8pansion of the universeN < e8plain

that in my forthcoming boo-& just now coming off the presses. The Hohren0type e8periment 9with the so0called 'negative resonance absorption of the medium': is also an e8periment routinely done by nonlinear optical departments. <t outputs !% or so times as much energy as one inputs. There are some other important contributions of the >eaviside component that < will include in the paper& which will re1uire another two or three months to finish. >owever& my main point is thisA ?hen the long0unaccounted 000 2IH<TI2I<7J e8cluded! 000 >eaviside energy flow component is re0accounted& then every generator and battery and dipolar power source in the universe already pours out enormously more +* energy than the mechanical shaft energy input to the generator& the chemical energy dissipated in the battery& and so on. 2ll of them always have. Dne can e8perimentally demonstrate the e8istence of that long0neglected component& by a Hohren0type e8periment. )ee Mraig (. Hohren& '>ow can a particle absorb more than the light incident on it=' 2merican .ournal of 3hysics& 5!94:& 2pr. !"%3& p. 3/303/6. Qnder nonlinear conditions& a particle can absorb more energy than is in the light incident on it. *etallic particles at ultraviolet fre1uencies are one class of such particles and insulating particles at infrared fre1uencies are another. )ee also >. 3aul and I. (ischer& bMomment on '>ow can a particle absorb more than the light incident on it='c&' 2m. .. 3hys.& 5!94:& 2pr. !"%3& p. 3/6. The Hohren e8periment is repeatable and produces MD3 B !%. 2nyway& you have true negative resistors everywhere you turnA in every charge in the universe& and every power source also if you re0account for the long0neglected >eaviside nondiverged energy flow component associated with every field/charge and potential/charge interaction. Tom Hearden 00000Driginal *essage00000 (romA .erry Fec-er ZmailtoAjdec-er`-eelynet.com[ )entA )aturday& )eptember !4& /##/ 5A!$ 3* ToA eelynet McA Gandolf Gwynn )ubjectA IeA Z eelynet[ Mhanges at .ohn Hedini's web site >i Gandolf et al! <nteresting about the changes at Hedini's site.....< just have a problem with claims that this battery recharging phenomenon is a true negative

resistance effect. <t has all the earmar-s of what many of us& including me& are prone to pull out as a potential e8planation...something interesting& but weird and unproven to date... The spoo-/alt science definition of a negative resistorN httpA//www.-eelynet.com/;pe/negistor.htm ...True negative resistance just means a "resistor" or other component that outputs more energy than it inputs. +et*s look at one attributeD 0n forward time, a positive resistor is an element that diverges and scatters energy from a flow of energy passing through it. $rom the negistor article? ...0t is known that some transistors, when connected into a circuit in reveres, have a negative resistance similar to that of a tunnel diode. That is, the current through and the voltage across the transistor both increase until the voltage reaches a certain point. Then the transistor breaks down and any further increase in current results in a decrease in voltage. ...The behavior of the *negistor* is caused by avalanche multiplication as a result of impact ioni,ation produced by mobile charge carriers. ...7hen used in tunnel diode application is, the output of a negistor is much greater than that of the diode 3tunnel diode4. (s a U2T, the reverse transistor dissipates power only during breakdown and therefore its use is limited only by the peak current. $rom +ambda diode notes? ...the +ambda diode is a superior #uantum device. !ontrary to pedestrian understanding super5conducitivity is an aspect of charge 3!ooper pairing of electrons4 &1T the condutor. Thus the tunnel diode, &egistor and +ambda diode are room temperature super5conductors 3,ero ohms 0% super5conductivity>4. 55555555555555555555555 httpDGGwhatis.techtarget.comGdefinitionG<,,sid:NgciB9;C9:,<<.html 7hen an analog signal passes through a diode operating at or near its

forward breakover point, the signal waveform is distorted. This nonlinearity allows for modulation, demodulation, and signal mixing. 0n addition, signals are generated at harmonics, or integral multiples of the input fre#uency. %ome diodes also have a characteristic that is imprecisely termed negative resistance. =iodes of this type, with the application of a voltage at the correct level and the polarity, generate analog signals at microwave radio fre#uencies. 55555555555555555555555 (bout Tunnel =iodes? httpDGGwww.americanmicrosemi.comGtutorialsGtunneldiode.htm ( tunnel diode is a semiconductor with a negative resistance region that results in very fast switching speeds , up to C 6',. The operation depends upon a #uantum mechanic principle known as "tunneling" wherein the intrinsic voltage barrier 3<.; /olt for 6ermanium junctions4 is reduced due to doping levels which enhance tunneling. The reverse breakdown for tunnel diodes is very low, typically B<<m/, and the T= conducts very heavily at the reverse breakdown voltage. 8eferring to the )= curve the back diode conducts to a lesser degree in a forward direction . 0t is the operation between these two points that makes the back diode important. $orward conduction begins at ;<< m/ 3for germanium4 and a voltage swing of only C<<m/ is re#uired for full range operation. 55555555555555555555555 0 prefer to lean towards desulphation as the true reason for what is occurring which in fact might be a slowly degrading, possibly cold fusion dissolution of the electrodes over time as they convert to the extra energy used in the system. -eep in mind cold fusion uses pure components in combination which react to produce high temperatures which tend to degrade to lower temperatures over time as the components *corrode* due to transmutations, eventually the anomalous heat effects stop when the components become too degraded to function. This is very similar to a battery in that you can restore the function by replacing the components or possibly cleaning off the surface corrosion 3sulphate in batteries4 and replacing the electrolyte.

55555555555555555555555 !onsider, what is a lead acid battery" httpDGGwww.tpub.comGdoeleadacidGleadacidC.htm ...The active materials in a battery are those that participate in the electrochemical chargeGdischarge reaction. These materials include the electrolyte and the positive and negative electrodes. (s mentioned earlier, the electrolyte in a lead5acid battery is a dilute solution of sulfuric acid 3'J%1,4. The negative electrode of a fully charged battery is composed of sponge lead 3.b4 and the positive electrode is composed of lead dioxide 3.b1,4. ...(s the battery discharges, the active materials in the electrodes 3lead dioxide in the positive electrode and sponge lead in the negative electrode4 react with sulfuric acid in the electrolyte to form lead sulfate and water. 1n recharge, the lead sulfate on both electrodes converts back to lead dioxide 3positive4 and sponge lead 3negative4, and the sulfate ions 3%1,*54are driven back into the electrolyte solution to form sulfuric acid. 555555555555555555555555 httpDGGwww.nwes.comGusingNbatteries.htm ...%torage batteries do not store electrical energy, but convert electrical energy into chemical energy which is slowly accumulated as the charge progresses. ( battery in use is said to be on discharge. =uring discharge, the chemical energy stored in the battery is converted into usable electrical energy. ...The reaction that occurs in discharging the cell can be reversed, and it can be restored to its former charged condition by sending direct current through it in an opposite direction to the current flow on discharge. ...The active materials are restored to their respective conditions, and the electrolyte again becomes a more concentrated sulfuric acid solution. !ell voltage rises as the two plates become increasingly different in composition and the specific gravity of the electrolyte increases. (s an operating guide, to obtain the best performance and life from an 85E storage battery, the depth of discharge must not exceed

K<O of the battery*s rated capacity in ampere hours. 0t should be charged after each cycle or whenever the specific gravity of the electrolyte falls below 9.B;<. 0t is very important that proper ventilation be provided during charging to make certain that 394 the hydrogen gas given off toward the end of the charging process is dissipated, and 3B4 that individual cell electrolyte temperatures during normal operations do not exceed 99CP $. ...The term specific gravity describes the ratio of the density of electrolyte to the density of water. Electrolyte weighing 9.B times as much as the same volume of water has a specific gravity of 9.B<<. The full charge gravity of a cell is a matter of design and depends on several factors. The specific gravity must be high enough to contain the amount of sulfuric acid necessary to meet the chemical needs of a cell. 0f the sulfuric acid content is too high, damage may result to the cell. The standard full charge gravity for lead acid batteries used in an 85E system is 9.BC< to 9.BKC depending on which type of battery you are using. %ince the acid content of the electrolyte decreases linearly as the cell is discharged, the decrease in gravity is directly proportionate to the amount in ampere5hours taken out. The specific gravity at any point in the discharge indicates the depth of discharge, and can be translated into amp hours taken out. ( cell having a full charge specific gravity of 9.BK< and a final specific gravity of 9.9;< has a gravity drop of 9C< points. 55555555555555555555555 httpDGGwww.geocities.comGbioelectrochemistryGplante.htm ...&ote that )1T' E+E!T81=E% =0%%1+/E into the electrolyte during the discharge reaction. 7hen charged the reverse reactions occur, although overcharge will lead to the electrolysis of water and conse#uent production of 3ha,ardous4 'B 3g4 at the cathode. The electrodes in a standard automotive battery are built as sets of interleaved plates to provide the maximum surface area for the electrochemical reaction. (s the vast majority of lead5acid batteries have multiple cells in series, the battery casing contains divider walls to isolate the cells. Each cell in a lead5acid battery provides about two volts. +ead5acid batteries usually have large capacities, though they tend to run down #uickly, and can be recharged hundreds of times until their electrodes are too eroded to allow the battery to hold a charge.

They have indefinite shelf lives if stored without electrolyte. Their active materials are environmentally ha,ardous and re#uire recycling as a reasonable environmental safety measure, a characteristic suffered to a greater or lesser degree by most batteries, which often incorporate heavy5metal electrodes and toxic electrolytes. 55555555555555555555555 crystallographics of what happens to a battery in different phases of operation? httpDGGgeosci.uchicago.eduGalumniG(pril9::KGsteele.html 0t was his background in crystallography and materials science and analysis that led the lead5acid battery producers to seek him out as a consultant. 0n the course of this he conceived a method whereby a lead5acid battery could be inserted into a neutron diffraction instrument to follow the crystallographic changes that take place in all phases of battery operation over its life. 7hat lead compounds form, their degrees of crystallinity and their crystal si,es are the major factors in how long a battery can perform and how many recharge cycles it can undergo before failure. 55555555555555555555555 &ow considering all of the above, .(8T0!U+(8+@ the notice that the lead plates partially =0%%1+/E into solution during the discharge...and to some extent 8E)U0+= during recharge and when you buy a new battery, you do not !'(86E 0T...it is two dissimilar metals electrically connected on addition of the sulphuric acid as electrolye and allowed to !'(86E on their own, getting the power from the electrochemical reaction.... it seems to me, the same effect is happening here....with the end result being the eventual destruction of the electrodes as they dissolve away like alka5selt,er... This was the point 0 was trying to make with 2ohn )edini regarding desulphation as a more probable cause of the *additional* energy in a closed self5running system. 0 could be wrong, but it makes more sense to me than time reversed negative resistance....

2ohn said in one email that he believed the sulphuric acid molecular structure possibly changed when subjected to his cold boiling type desulphation via recharging system....he said tests were being done to verify this, but 0 never heard and he never communicated what the results of the analysis were... 0*m not trying to muddy the water but 0 simply have no confidence in the negative resistance claim....in Tilley*s building power system, 0$ it works as claimed, the output from his mystery spinner goes into an off the shelf converter to recharge the batteries and 0 don*t think the manufacturer 3T8(!E systems as 0 recall4 is claiming any kind of negative resistance effect or for that matter any anomalous effect. 0t is an off the shelf windmillGsolar cell type recharger module. The key, pure and simple, is what Tilley says is a !1. of ;D9....three times more 1UT than 0& from the mystery spinner.... &ow )edini*s system is #uite different to my view and so could well use something novel and uni#ue, though 0 still think its desulphation as above...QgR....but Tilleys claim is just more out than in...which is why he can use any battery, even the off5the5shelf 7al art $leet batteries.... The less spookiness we can discard from these things, the sooner we can pin these butterflies down to dissect and reverse engineer into hardware.....gee,, all 0 want is that tabletop demo....just make it run a load without being a pendulum effect that will eventually die over time.... Thats what bothers me with the use of batteries....too many additional considerations with chemistry....why can a similar system not be applied to capacitors or some other method that minimi,es the possible conversion of mass to energy" 6andolf 6wynn wroteD R R 0t seems that 2ohn )edini has revamp his web site, please take a look at? R RhttpDGGwww.icehouse.netGjohn9G R R 0f i understand,

R it only takes a 9<< /olts =! pulse into a 9B/ dc battery to get momentarily a negative resistor" R 0f so, then we need to know D R R 95 'ow much current must be pulsed into this battery" R B5 'ow long the pulse is R R Take care. 55 2erry 7. =ecker 5 httpDGGwww.keelynet.com from an (rt to a %cience 5 order out of !haos discussion list 5 httpDGGwww.escribe.comGscienceGkeelynet

+arth Hatteries
<mprovements in +arth0Hatteries for +lectric Mloc-s.

Faniel Frawbaugh

.an.!4& !%6"

+arth Ground Generator

*ichael +mme 2pril&!%&!%"3

*ary +mme. )torage Hattery.

)torage Hattery useing the earth *ay&!"&!"#3

+lectric +arth Hattery

George (. Fiec-man ,ovember 3&!%%5

+arth Hattery

.ames Mhapman Hryan .anuary /6&!%65

+arth Hattery for Generating +lectricity

?illiam F. )now .une $& !%64 +lectric03iles

Ground Iadio
by Gerry 4assilatos

IDQ,F Iadio is a subject which has remained on the periphery of engineering

discussions for decades. <t has maintained its elusive and mysterious poise because of fundamental anomalies observed when its methods are utili;ed& anomalies which manifest when signals are both transmitted and received directly through the ground. The inability to ade1uately address the associated anomalies has produced a remar-able impasse among conventional engineers. *any highly 1ualified such persons are 1uite sure that the Ground Iadio phenomenon is ade1uately e8plained through classic theoretical propagation models. +8perimental findings however& have brought to our attention several anomalous features of this form of Iadio propagation. Dnly an e8tensive and deliberated e8ploration of Ground Iadio will prove our several discoveries in the art. Iudimentary and ine8pensive in re1uirement& e8periments with Ground Iadio provide an endless source of anomalies. +8perimental investigations of these methods may begin with as little e1uipment as a shortwave receiver& a copper pipe& and a length of wire. The rest remains in the strangely lost art of interpretation. The accurate interpretation of the findings derived through such e8perimentation re1uires familiarity with the pertinent bibliography. ?e hope that the reader is encouraged to duplicate and surpass these methods& as those who do so will not be without their due reward. The discovery of new and unfamiliar phenomena can be yours...when you ta-e the first step.

!ELLU&I

U&&EN!S

The metaphysical earth currents were both observed and described in great detail by (r. 2thanasius ircher. >is writings preserve an ancient -nowledge which concerned itself wholly with the vitality of the earth. The metaphysical telluric currents were -nown to permeate the world& the energies which mediating vitality. *aps of telluric currents were the pri;ed possessions of geomancers& permitting the -nowledge of vitality control on earth. <t is said that wars were fought by the selective elimination or e8altation of specific veinwor-s in the telluric circulatory system. The science of

Geomancy thus formed the mysterious historical bac-drop against which a wide variety of natural observations were subse1uently made.

..). *ellon
+lectro0 Therapeutic 2ppliance

?ith time& the e8periential appreciation for the metaphysical earth energies was systematically lost. The more 1ualified scientific observers replaced their sensitive e8perience of telluric energies with a merely superficial observation of geoelectric currents. This schism has provo-ed the controversial thesis upon which our present discussion is therefore based. ?hile some will be defiantly confident that e8periential telluric energies are resolved into geoelectrical currents& we remain just as adamant in our absolute conviction that the e8periential telluric energies precede and define the observed geoelectric patterns. This schism has not& and will never be resolved. )o long as there are those who insist on observing the superficialities of natural phenomenon& completely obsessed with the -inematics of otherwise e8perience0filled phenomena& there will be a scientific conflict.

White7 D1( G( S( Gosmo-'lectroGulture& 7os 2ngeles& !"/". The filtration of highly selected portions of natural phenomena characteri;es contemporary 1uantitative science. Qntil the scientific community becomes willing to admit the greater part of their e8perience& all considerations of natural phenomena will remain for them a blan- wall of intensities and numerical values. 2ncient )cience connected its pursuants with an e8perience& one gained through direct physiological contact with the telluric currents themselves. <t is in the active contact with these ground0derived currents alone that we recogni;e the true and fundamental continuum in which our world is set& an e8pansive e8perience by which we access and learn the ancient arcanum. The discovery that various signal species could be both transmitted and received directly through grounded terminals& forms the fascinating subject matter of a largely

forgotten historical record. <n this regards& we find a technical bibliography replete with remar-able instances of early successful e8perimentation in the art of drawing power and signals directly from the ground. Mompletely ignoring the fact that a large bibliography of anomalies had been compiled by research predecessors& engineers of the time developed communications systems which relied entirely on electrical currents. 2s a carrier of code and voice& electricity was 'reliable'. Hut with increasing engineering emphasis on electricity and electrical technology& the subject of geomantic energies was driven into forgetfulness. Thereafter& those who confused geomantic energy with electrostatic effects were the cause of the numerous controversies by which 7ate 4ictorian )cience is characteri;edN endless confusions in terms and identifications. ?hen the subject of long0distance communications was compelled to shift thematic emphasis away from the vitalistic foundations& it lost touch with an energy which did not cease e8erting strong influences on the developing electrical technology of the time period. Dnly a few& now legendary researchers& continued the geomantic tradition. (rom the very first moment in which ground connections were established in a telegraphic signalling line& inventors and operators of electrical systems noticed anomalous energetic behaviors in the ground. The very first attempts at long distance telegraphy involved the burial of highly insulated double lines 9*orse and 4ail:. Qpon first closure of the telegraph -ey& the signalling components became so thoroughly suffused with charge that the e8change of signals became an impossibility. <n truth& the art of wired and wireless communication began in a reawa-ened appreciation of geomancy and geomantic energies. This remar-able reminder came about with the replacement of the original /0wire telegraph line 9Ieusser& !6"4: by the !0wire method 92ldini& !%#3:& the latter re1uiring far less wire and several ground plate terminations. The telegraph stations of *orse used grounded plates& a means by which engineers imagined the 'necessary return current...through the ground'. ?ired code on a single overhead wire was thus 'matched' by an opposed ground return of charge& a condition which fulfilled the prevalent model of electrical closure.

GE"$AN!I IN U&SIVES
2s none of these researchers actually measured the elusive 'ground current'& many engaged an imaginative freeplay in the artistic description of the same. )everal patent drawings reveal a curiously geomantic flair& the meandering 'return currents' flowing over land and stream to their terminals. >ere we find remar-able evidence that these inventors were in fact engaging in a form of geomantic vision& describing an entirely different and more agile energy species than electrical current 9(armer& 2der& (row:. Toward the pea- successful operation of telegraph and telephone systems& the proper placement of terminal plates was an absolute re1uirement. 2s this art demanded special ability& the first telegraph linesmen used the methods familiar to dowsers. The

very placement of ground plates& poles& and junction bo8es was& for these linesmen& completely predicated on the strong presence of upwelling energies from the earth. +mpirical evidence proved these methods superior to 'resistance surveying' in the placement of station plates and other components. Telegraph lines so constructed were possessed of a noumenous and suffusive 1uality. ,atural geomancers had provided the means. >ere was evidence that another energetic stratum was governing the development and limiting the establishment of long0distance electrical communications systems. The subjective e8perience of linesmen was ample indication that such a mysterious energy stratum was indeed present and active. Thus& the invasive energy demonstrated its ability to enforce certain restrictions on the establishment and operation of Telegraphy and Telephonic systems. The communications technology& which engineers imagined to be completely independent of natural agency& was being subverted by an everpresent geomantic influence. Hesides the obvious geomantic incursions& those which influenced the decisions of wor-men and designers& the energetic presence made itself -nown in several other ways. 3ower literally appeared 'from the ground' in many stations& a condition which 2lfred 4ail reported 9!%3":. >e found it necessary to progressively remove batteries from the first long0distance telegraph line& reporting this remar-able manifestation of energy to his elder partner& )amuel *orse. 7ines operated on an energy which e8ceeded the battery supply& and ground0connective communications systems were especially prone to bi;arre energy manifestations. >oping to save the finance of e8cessive wire line& many telegraph systems implemented the discovery that code could easily 'pass through water'. To this end& engineers e8perimented with the use of widely separated groundplates& a means which proved strangely successful. +8periments with ground0conduction established telegraphic contact through an isthmus 9*orse& !%4/:& through streams 94ail& !%43:& wide rivers 97indsay& !%43:& canals 9>ighton& !%5/:& across a bay 9*eucci& !%4$:& through the earth 9)tubblefield& !%6/:& and between distant islands 93reece& !%%#:. 2n accidental discovery proved that one longline system continued operating with great strength of signal& despite the fact that the line had been literally bro-en in several places. The reali;ation that code signals could actually enter and traverse the ground for several hundred yards& and then reenter a grounded line& triggered a new revolution. Thereafter& combined wired and wireless lin-s formed the greater portion of telegraph e8changes across the miles of ,orth 2merican countryside. Ground plates launched code signals into predetermined land tracts and waterways& signals being conveyed along specific subterranean routes. )ignals passed 'into and through the ground' to each ne8t ground plate of a series. ?hen reentering the ne8t groundplate& signals continued through the overhead lines to their appointed destinations. )tations received very strong signals in this method& signals with great clarity and force. >ere were the

early beginnings of the conduction wireless methods& and relied on the mysterious nature of ground conduction and ground energy for their successful operation. <t was clear to linesmen and operators that the signal energy could not possibly be maintained over such long ground and water conduction paths without amplification. )ome e8ternal agency was somehow augmenting and modifying the applied signal impulses. The anomalous functioning of these largescale regional signalling systems proved again that the geomantic agency was literally wending its way through the line networ-s. ,ot every such line operated in this manner& the geomantic currents selecting very specific paths for its operation. This topographic selectivity hailed attention bac- to the maps once treasured by geomancers. The augmentation of applied electrical energy was obvious. These specially placed telegraph and telephone lines operated for years without batteries at all. )tation operators too- this phenomenon for granted. Fespite the 'long dead and corroded +dison Mells'& telegraph station operators continued the powerful e8change of 'fat blue and spar-ing' signals for decades 97ehr:. Dther researchers corroborated the fact that usable amounts of current could actually be derived from the ground& currents whose powerful displays permitted the elimination of battery cups and generators. The failure of all reductive electrical models to satisfactorily address these energetic characteristics became especially evident with the development of the 'earth batteries'& an outgrowth of these telegraphic observations 9Hain& !%4":. These simple material composites& made to be buried in earth& produced currents not e8plained through electrolytic action. )mall buried earth batteries developed sufficient power to charge storage batteries. They were also employed to provide telegraphic 9Hryan& Merpau8& Fiec-mann& .ac1ues& Hear:& and later telephonic systems 9)tubblefield& )trong& Hrown& Tom-ins& 7oc-wood: with uninterrupted operating power. ,either decomposing nor failing with months of buried use& the mysterious earth batteries contain an essential mystery which electrodynamic models cannot ade1uately e8plain. Those who doubt these facts may attempt the simplest of e8periments. 3lace two identical copper rods into the ground however distant your s-epticism demands. The ground can be dry. Monnect a galvanometer to each rod by means of thin wire. 2n anomalous positive reading results. This simple fact illustrates the concepts taught by ,athan )tubblefield& who stated that earth batteries do not generate electricityA they intercept and receive ground flowing telluric currents. <f you wish to find strong telluric currents by this means& place one of your two ground rods into a tree root. The galvanometer should be wired close to this base. The other rod is wired and can be placed in se1uentially different spots. Ieadings can literally 'pin' the meter& holding it there for wee-s. Telluric incursives continued to 'interrupt' all electrical communications methods which employed the ground as a medium of e8change. These incursives revealed aspects of the geomantic nature as each new technology was connected to the ground. The mere appearance of additional power was greatly outperformed when& just prior

to the advent of Telephony& a shortlived revolution swept the Telegraphic ?orld. Mertain telegraph companies replaced all of their electromagnetic systems with the Mhemical& or '2utomatic Telegraph' of 2le8ander Hain 9!%4":. The Mhemical Telegraph regime utili;ed the electrosensitivity of special chemical papers to register incoming signals. Mode impulses made their dar- blue mar-s on the rolling strip of sensitive paper& the tas- of decoding having thus been made 'automatic'. Hecause of the low power re1uirements typical to their method& the 2utomatic Telegraph lines were successfully operated across much greater distances than their electromagnetic counterparts. (rom the very first& some such Mhemical Telegraph systems operated on ground power alone. ,ot only did these systems produce strong signal mar-ings in complete absence of batteries& but partly coherent signals spontaneously appeared in absence of operators as well! The mystifying appearance of fragmentary sentences and geometric patterns was continually observed in idle Mhemical Telegraph receivers& a phenomenon which has been discussed in a former treatise 94ril Mompendium 4ol. 3:. 3erceptive investigators clearly perceived that incursions of geomantic energy were dynamically modifying and augmenting every ground application of electrical energy. )uch anomalous energy manifestations& which often revealed a perple8ing time0periodicity& found no plausible e8planation among the theoreticians. ?ith the introduction of Telephony& the use of simple buried terminal plates was soon replaced by a great number of special articulate ground components. 2gain re1uiring geomantic sensitivity for their proper ground placement and orientation& these remar-able interleaved and multivented forms literally launched and received signals along selective topographic directions 9Taylor and *uirhead& 7ugo& )mith:. Hesides those anomalous power observations in telegraphic and telephonic systems& anomalous observations were noted with the development of wireless communications. The relevant bibliography is filled with instances of geomantic power incursions in wireless systems. These incursions& clearly understood by early wireless pioneers as effects of the earth connection& made their impact on the engineering community.

G&"UNDWAVE &ADI"
The late part of the ,ineteenth Mentury was a rich and productive time for the empirical researchers& those who e8plored the deep mysteries of ground conduction radio. )uch investigation produced a new world of possibilities in the ?ireless 2rts. +8perimenters found distinctive differences when varieties of geometric shapes were simply buried& a series of discoveries having no satisfactory conventional e8planation. 2 great many highly speciali;ed ground 'antennas' were developed and patented

during this time period& a technology which provo-ed both disbelief and criticism on numerous counts.9+ach metal emits it's own sounds fre1uency: The very first vocal radio broadcast was engaged by ,athan H. )tubblefield 9!%6/:. *r. )tubblefield employed special 'earth cells' and long iron rods to transmit strong vocal signals 'with great clarity'. These signals traversed a mile or more of ground& a coordinated conduction wireless system providing telephone service for a hardwor-ing farm community. The )tubblefield Iadio *ethod represents an essential technological mystery. >is 'earth cells' never wore out& never produced heat in their telephonic components& and provided 'signal ready' power at any given instant of the day. Heing neither activated or assisted by additional battery power& the system was fully operational around the cloc-. 7ater critics attempted the reduction of the )tubblefield Iadio )ystem to mere 'subsoil conduction' mode of transmission& but remain completely unable to reproduce the performance to this day. *r. )tubblefield repeatedly stated confidence in the fact that his Iadio )ystem was performing an act of modulation& not a transmission of signal power. The pree8isting 'electrical waves in the earth'& he firmly stated& were the real energy carriers for his ?ireless Telephone +8change. The special 'earth cells' were connective terminals& not power antennasN a means by which direct connection with the geomantic energy stratum was obtained. <n an entirely different regime of e8ploration& a regime having nothing whatsoever to do with waveradio energies& Fr. ,i-ola Tesla directed the construction of a massive radiating structure on the northshore of 7ong <sland. >is previous years of e8perience taught him the secrets concerning radiant energy and its effective propagation through the air and space 9!%"/ to !"##:. Qnderstanding the means by which radiant energy may be more effectively beamed down through the ground& Fr. Tesla established the magnificent ?ardenclyffe )tation 9!"#!:. Tesla intended ?ardenclyffe to be the first of a series& stations for the subterranean beam transmission of radiant energy. 3ropagation of very large diameter radiant energy beams had been found more effective for given power purposes& when conducted through solid roc-. Tesla found that the earth was transparent to these penetrating straightline beams& and planned the use of deeply imbedded ground terminals in order to direct and launch his special radiant energy. Fr. Tesla too- special pains to establish the e8tensive underground conducting system in order 'to get a grip of the earth'. This most comple8 construction operation& necessarily e8ecuted long before the great tower was erected& too- place below the 3ower Hroadcast )tation. Tesla stated that this was the most difficult part of his construction operation at ?ardenclyffe& the drilling of long iron pipes having first been driven down to more than 3## feet into the foundation roc-. 2t a depth of !/# feet& Tesla e8cavated several radiating shafts& long hallways whose internal walls were covered with pitch and surrounded with iron pipewor-s. These shafts e8tended outward at this hori;ontal depth for several hundred feet in all directions& a formidable

ground projector. Heneath the central chambers of this *agnifying Transmitter& the deeply embedded terminals actually formed the primary beaming structureN a bi;arre conception which was literally rediscovered in legal documents. (r. .osef *urgas 9!"#$: produced a remar-able series of articulated monopole terminals. These coa8ial coil monopoles were deeply drilled pipes& filled with mineral oil and activated by radioimpulses. ?ith these designs& (r. *urgas e8changed e8tremely powerful and static0free signals to great distances with very little applied power. The later proliferation of ground aerial designs included double grounded arches 9Tesla& Mollins& Fucretet& *usits& 3ic-ard:& underwater and underground coils 9.ones:& underground loops 9Hea-es:& 'bent07' inversions 92ppleby& noll:& and underground channel0loops 9>anson:. Df these buried ground systems& none were as prolific as those developed by .ames >arris Iogers 9!"!3:. *ost properly categori;ed as buried dipoles& Iogers antennas rested across the subsurface hori;on of the ground& and were relatively easy to establish. Fesirous of creating 47( and +7( transmission sites for oceangoing surface and submerged fleet vessels& ground antenna designers attracted the attentions of the ,I7 and other military research laboratories. <n the effort to establish failsafe communications between command centers and distant fleet& ground surface& or submerged forces& military engineers e8plored both Iogers buried antennas and *urgas drilled monopoles. To the thrift0minded military engineers& the buried Iogers 2ntennas were more accessible than the more effective and world permeating *urgas designs. 3laced into long plowed furrows& the various Iogers antennas provided clarified signals. Mompared with the large overhead aerials of other designers& Iogers buried antennas performed in a remar-ably constant and dependable manner. 3roducing strong signals& of both greatly depressed static and e1uivalent reduced distortion levels& the Iogers designs were pri;ed by ,aval Iadio engineers. Iogers buried antennas were buried dipoles& a method application to an old design. Hecause the Iogers 2ntenna series were buried dipoles& their performance theoretically completely depended upon their compass orientations. The polari;ation of transmitted or received signals necessitated that Iogers 2ntennas be properly placed in the ground with respect to compass bearings& a restriction none8istent with the superior *urgas *onopoles. Hut Iogers 2ntennas were admirably suited to the developing ,aval Iadio hardware. Friven by sinewave generators& rather than Teslian aether pulses& the Iogers designs operated in the >ert;ian wave mode ade1uately enough to win military support. (ew military e8perts bothered to recall that these designs were all purloined from directly from the Tesla patents& a fact which the genteel Tesla never bothered to cite. 3eriodically classified and declassified& the Iogers designs and their modifications have formed the core of the military 47( and +7( communications arsenal. Hut most of the researchers instinctively sought out those monopoles which (r. *urgas developed& and which the military had overloo-ed. Throughout the early part of the Twentieth Mentury& a great variety of ground antennas made their sudden appearance

in the commercial radio mar-et. +8perimenters everywhere were discovering that different shapes and materials were capable of providing e8traordinarily strong radio transmissions and receptions when simply buried.

G&"UND !E&$INALS
2ttempts of devising newer and more effective ground antenna designs provo-ed several intriguing e8plorations. The most ama;ing discoveries included those made with relatively small buried metal forms. Iadio rules changed completely when buried antenna were employed& the complete elimination of >ert;ian dimension restrictions being the first observation. Qnli-e their aerial counterparts& buried terminals were not bound by those e8acting re1uirements of wavelength. Dne did not re1uire lateral dimensions e1ual to the normal shortwave aerial yardage& the first feature recogni;ed by radio amateurs. <t was indeed during this time period that the customary use of old iron radiators and large metal bedsprings& scrap metal surplus& became an e8perimental vogue with radio amateurs. These buried& highly articulated iron forms& provided powerful evidence that the ground antenna principle actually wor-ed. <n the classic models& the burial of any aerial structure represented immersion in a conductive medium. The burial of conductors in the ground was viewed as reduction to a uniform& neutral electrical gradient. This condition sufficiently neutrali;ed all of the geometric differences within an isoelectric hori;on. +lectrodynamic theory stated that any buried metal composite& however 'variegated' or 'articulated' in form& would simply behave as a 'lumped' resistance. ?hile the use of variegated antennas posed no threat to the e8isting paradigm& academicians considered the concept of buried variegated antennas a theoretical impossibility. <ndeed& those who e8amined ground aerial patents found completely problematic the notion that highly variegated geometric structures could demonstrate differing degrees of transmissive or receptive advantage. +lectrical engineers insisted that the net surface areas of these buried 'articulate' forms alone determined their resultant e8cessive performance. <n this consideration& material composition did not matter. Monductivity was the prime factor. Fiffering only in their various surface areas& the only theoretical differences among buried geometries& in addition to those of mere surface area& were thought to be factors of electrolytic corrosion. The more pitted the ground contact surface& the more li-ely a buried object would become better conductive to signals. The microsurficial increase of surface contact through corrosive pitting was called to e8plain the 'additional gain'. )ince the electrical merits of buried materials were supposedly the simple result of surface area and the effectively moved electrical volume& the result of this inherent surface area& no special discovery was ac-nowledged among the authorities. Hut

empirical determinations proved that different geometric shapes and 9more unbelievably: different material composites& actually did effect an enhanced 'launching' of radiosignals far in e8cess of their calculated surface area. )olid plates of calculated e1uivalent surface did not perform as magnificently as the buried radiators or bedsprings. he articulated e8posure for potential conduction increasing to or from the surrounding ground. Hut empirical research consistently overturned each of the theoretical contentions& proving by incontestable demonstration the superior signalling characteristics of articulate ground terminals. 2nomalous signal strengths were both transmitted from and received through ground transmitting systems far in e8cess of intensities or topographic distances declared possible by theory. This was particularly true when the ground transmitting antennas were powered by spar-0generated& asymmetric impulse currents. )ignals were somehow being 'collimated and constricted' within the ground proper. This constrictive action did not e8plain all of the observed signal intensities. +vidence had again suggested that the ground was 'lea-ing' a non0electrical component up into both the electrical systems and their emerging signals. <n fact& several widely advertised and highly successful designs included the 'Jale Ground >og'& the ')ubtenna'& the '2eroliminator'& and the ')ubaerial'. These few representatives demonstrated the superiority of ground antennas& a validity which literally emptied the stoc- rooms of each ground antenna distributor. Fr. (. 7. )atterlee& an L0Iay specialist& developed several 'tuned ground' radio receivers. <mplemented by The *oon Iadio Mompany& these radiosets placed their performance boasts on a remar-able 'antenna0free' operation. The principle advantage of these ground antennas was their static0eliminating nature. The ease of their installation and maintenance combined great signalling efficiency. )everal of the commercial units needed only to be connected with a cold water pipe& their powerful and 'static0free' reception being une1ualled by the more conventional 'aerial receivers'. 2dditionally& waveradio receivers produced by The *oon Iadio Mompany operated during normally impossible meteorological and geophysical conditionsN a condition well described by ,i-ola Tesla. 2 great many inventors continued producing truly ama;ing diversity in the 'ground antenna' format. Throughout this time of ama;ing and anomalous discoveries& the empirical method led the way.

NA!U&AL A$%LIFIE&
<t had been clearly observed by a number of e8perimenters that the environment e8erted strong and dynamic action on transmitter signals. <t was long -nown that this mysterious energy species could actively charge ground0connected radio systems in absence of applied power& the early e8periments of 7oomis having established this

principle 9!%$/:. This agency was very obviously possessed of an inherently superior articulate nature& being able to distinguish and energi;e buried material composites and varied geometric forms. <n addition& the energetic ground agency seemed able to selectively see- out& constrict into& and intensify the incoming signal power of distant stations. There were obviously other influences which determined the nature of ground0traversing signals. +8perimenters reali;ed that these effects differed with both the methods used in obtaining the spar- energy& the manner in which disturbances were launched into the environment& the grounds into which signals were launched& and the specific directions along which they were launched. The spar- applications of small e8perimental radiotransmitters produced signals of une8pected large volume at great distances& empirical evidence of an une8plained signal 'amplifier' in the natural environment 92ppleton and Harnett:. 47( amplification effects had been empirically recogni;ed among radio engineers on both sides of the 2tlantic. <n fact& the very first historical Transatlantic )ignals of *arconi were problematic from every engineering standpoint. The calculated losses& theoretically e8pected of these signals& were far too great to account for his first claimed successes 9!"#!:. This was a fact which provo-ed many to doubt and critici;e *arconiGs claims in the venture. 7ater repeatable demonstrations of the 47( amplification effect evo-ed few suggested e8planations from the engineering community. The concept that signals could ac1uire additional energy from an unac-nowledged geomantic source was not readily received by the academic community. )ome e8perimenters initiated dialogue on the possible gain of signals which had traversed the geomagnetic field 93rentice:. These gains were not the simple result of 'standing waves'& nor the result of >all +ffect intensifications provo-ed by launching signals across the geomagnetic field. The perple8ing effect was noted across the entire radiofre1uency spectrum& from 47( radiotelegraphic to shortwave radiotelephone services. Qnli-e the identical phenomena which too- place in wired telegraph and telephone lines& these effects were ta-ing place in complete absence of wire. Hut what dynamic agency was literally magnifying each relatively small initial signal= ?ith the installation of multiple *arconi Transatlantic )tations& it 1uic-ly became -nown that transoceanic 47( magnification phenomena were only obtained when signals were launched along highly specific 'launch paths'. Monformity with these 'launch paths' produced undistorted signals of une8pected great power and presence. 47( signals which were not applied to the special launchpaths& were simply lost in transit. The *arconi ?orld Iadio Mircuit relied these very obvious environmental controls& but it was 1uite impossible for engineers to follow the e8act pathways of these suboceanic signals. <t was first thought that the phenomenon had much to do with the submarine ground itself. Hy assuming the e8istence of special highly conductive marine geostrata& it was imagined that a simple geological survey could codify the selection of *arconi )tation sites.

Hut no such geological formula or pattern was ever found& to the great consternation of engineers and theoreticians ali-e. Firected along identical suboceanic geostrata& the very same 47( signals encountered une8pected and une8plained high signal resistivityN a frightful reali;ation for those whose labor was e8pended in the building of several *arconi )tations. ?hat was the strange 'absorptive potential' by which a launched signal could simply be drawn across a specific launchpath= <f not in the material strata of submarine geology& where then was this mysterious 'absorptive potential' contained= )everal sites were 1uietly abandoned by the *arconi Mompany& the matter being privately considered for very obvious business reasons. The prospect of statistical failure in the 'scientific' selection of 47( launchpaths displeased *arconi greatly. The use of dowsing methods would be very 'bad for business' if the fact became -nown to the scientific community at large. These factors eventually drove *arconi deeper into a study of shortwave aerial phenomena. Dther radio station engineers found it necessary to select station sites through 'alternative' or 'geomantic' means. This renewed awareness of geomantic energy& as well as the role of special points and pathways in effecting long distance communications& provo-ed a hostile and derisive reaction among conventional engineers.

S#"&!WAVES
The advent of shortwave radio systems however& produced intriguing anomalies& which found neither immediate theoretical models nor solutions. Qnable to account for the divergent signal strengths noted between separate aerial or ground contacts& fact0finding empirical research was again engaged. The models which theoreticians developed postulated that a loosely lin-ed 's-ywave' and 'groundwave' were responsible for the anomalous reception effects. <n this analysis of waveradio transmitters& a conduction wavesignal 'through the ground' was selectively either neutrali;ed or intensified by an aerial signal 'through the s-y' 9Hreit and Tuve:. ?ith the newly discovered ioni;ed atmospheric layer neatly providing 's-ipping' reflectivity for transmissions& the model was complete. 2ccordingly& the proper phasing of s-ipped s-ywaves and groundwaves produced resultant signals of unusual strength. <mproper phasing produced received signals were wea- or even absent. <t was then easy to comprehend the varying nature of shortwave signals whenever encountered. Dne could find reasonable e8planation for variable signal strengths throughout the day& month& and year. ')-ipping' s-ywaves met with continuous groundwaves to produce all of the observed signal receptions. 3hase shifting e8plained all of these variations. Dr did it= The use of very long& close0ground antennas was early implemented by those who sought the development of special aerial0ground hybrid antennas. The 'double

ground' aerial employed an elevated line with grounded ends. This format was limited by its orientation re1uirements& often acting as an e8cellent directional detector of distant stations. +8tremely low aerials were developed and used in !"!! 9 iebit;:& often e8tending to nearly !### feet in length and being poised to within a yard of ground level. <n !"!%& a similar system 92. >all: placed /6## feet of insulated cable along the ground surface& and claimed e8cellent reception characteristics. The famed 'Heverage 2ntenna' 9patent !&3%!&#%":& was the result of e8periments with several thousand straight feet of wiring on tall insulating posts& a design which attracted the fortune0aimed attentions of IM2. ?ishing to brea- the e8isting mar-et on special beam aerials& this design formed the means by which *arconi monopolies on the 'bent07' aerials were bro-en. The receptive clarity of this design increased with pro8imity to ground. IM2 could not infringe on the Iogers designs& or those of others& whose buried ground antennas produced better signal strength. These hori;on0hugging aerials provo-ed controversy because of their supposed necessary 'management' of a mi8ed s-y and ground wave comple8. +8periment proved that increasing elevations of the Heverage 2ntenna resulted in a pure and noisy s-ywave signal& with the greatest signal intensities being derived with the line placed as close to ground surface as possible. <n some cases& these ground0parallel aerials were poised on insulators !/ foot or less for best effect. Heing the design which represents the theoretical midpoint& between the buried Iogers dipole and the *arconi 'bent07'& the Heverage 2ntenna reveals that ground currents and ground signals are indeed distinct in origin and species. These results helped to convince many that the proposed 'near;one0far;one' radio principles were absolutely mista-en. <n fact& a special theory was developed to 'e8plain' the superior operation of the Heverage 2erial. Z2ll of these patents and articles are found in 4ril Mompendium 4olumes " and !#[. 2 great many popular radio maga;ine articles were devoted to the unusual reception of signals through the ground alone. To the amateur e8perimenters of the time& it was all too apparent that the theoretical assessments lac-ed reality. Those who studied radio propagation phenomena for military applications could not account for the fact that far too powerful ground signals continued with increasing range from their sourcepoint. Hy comparison& their aerial signal counterparts were far too wea-ened by the journey. +8perimenters found that the 's-ywave0groundwave' model did not e8plain the continued magnification of signals 'received through the ground'. ?hen compared to signals 'received through the air'& the ground signals were persistently more powerful& and far less eroded by static. Df the many energetic interactions occurring in and among spar- discharges& >ert; chose but two for analysis 9!%%6:. Monvention has agreeably restricted its considerations to the same& affirming that only two fields of influence ma-e themselves manifest at close distances from a spar-. The induction field& and the 'radiowave field'. <nduction field effects rapidly fall away with the inverse s1uare of distance from a spar- center. The 'true radio energy' is that wave energy which loses

intensity with the inverse distance from a spar- center. This difference of intensity with distance from the spar- center defines the radiofield. Iadio te8ts described the 'near;one' 9induction field: and the 'far;one' 9radiofield:. 3atent e8aminers used this model to eliminate all but the *arconi claims for wireless transmission of signals& a tragic reduction. (ar more important demonstrations proved the superiority of geomantic radio principles. Mertain highly 1ualified e8perimenters disagreed with the simplistic >ert;ian view& and contradicted the views of a growing mainstream 9)tubblefield& Tesla& *assey& *oray:. )ome thought that the induction field was the source of the unusual ground signals& the electrostatic influence which induced electron oscillations in the roc- immediately beneath transmitter towers. *uch improved ground configurations were thought to provide additional power to these relatively wea- induction oscillations. 7arge area copper screens or grids were pre0buried long before transmitting towers or aerials were erected. These conductive screens e8tended outward from the central transmitting a8is for several hundred yards in some instances. Thus directly applied& ground currents were given enormous impulse& a possible reason for the strong and predominating reception of local stations in neighborhood receivers. Theoretically& these induction sources were incapable of propagating beyond one 1uarter of a wavelength from their tower centers. Feep 47( ground currents of !# -ilocycles were therefore not to be received beyond !5 -ilometers from their source. The transmission of 3 megacycle signals would& according to these e8pectations& produce ground currents undetected beyond /5# feet from their source. These 'near;one0far;one' models did not e8plain the true signal strength received through ground antennas. ?hy for e8ample& could 47( signals be received from distances much further than !#&### miles from their aerial gantries= ?hy were shortwave signals routinely received from distances surpassing !5&### miles= ,evertheless& the ground antenna made such signal reception possible. Dne may yet demonstrate these dynamics with rudimentary ground rod antennas& a techni1ue which will shortly be described. The 'near;one0far;one' model does not e8plain why 47( signals are only received along specific constrictive paths& a mystery which deepens when it is reali;ed that such conductive ground paths are never found along strictly geodesic sections. (ield distribution e8periments show the meandering nature of 47( signals across regions of ground& a fact which correlates their much0amplified propagation with geomantic current paths. There were& in addition& several remar-able reversals of these same theoretical e8pectations. ?hy& across certain locales& was it impossible to receive the powerful shortwave transmissions of a station some several hundred yards away in plain sight= 'Iadio blindspots' could not be e8plained on the basis of earth conductivity or geophysical characteristics alone. These glaring propagation discrepancies posed neither problem nor threat to the empirical researchers& who formulated their own naturally accurate models. The anomalous 'blindspots' and 'frea- transmissions' which the routinely observed& were e8ceptions to the theoretical models. )uch notable

and une8plainable instances& while continuing to plague the modelma-ers& provo-ed far too little academic interest 9>ollingworth& Ouac-:. This e8perimental e8ample offered a most startling clue to the mode of transmission actually responsible for the operation of buried antenna designs. The 's-ywave0 groundwave' model presupposes that a singular radiosource will produce a singular radiating wave& half of the wave propagating through an aerial route& the other half being immersed in ground. 3assage through the atmospheric route gathers static signatures and other distortions which are supposedly induced throughout the wavefront. This aerial noise is transferred and distributed throughout the advancing wavefront. Heing absolutely tied to its aerial portion& the ground wave of any signal must therefore contain each ac1uired noise signature. The same holds true when the ground signal ac1uires static and distortions along its earthen propagation path. Then& the aerial portion receives new static signatures as a coe1ual distribution from the ground up. Hut all too many occasions prove the absolute contradiction of this model& and ground antennas provided the incontrovertible evidence. Huried terminals gave the clearest proof that aerial signals and ground signals were of completely different origin& those of the ground having the most obvious source in a powerful autodynamic matri8. 2erial waves were so obviously dissolved and 'digested' in transit from their distant sources& while ground currents often demonstrated anomalous intensification in transit. <t was furthermore 1uite obvious that electrical currents were not responsible for the ground currents beyond the theoretical 1uarterwave limits. )ignals received through the ground were clarified and strong& even when aerial sampling proved that there should be only a static 'hiss'. +8periments have shown that the sometimes 'wavering' behavior of ground received signals are the result of completely different origins& a dynamic response to completely distinct causes. 2dded articulate dimensions made their appearance in a regime of improved ground antennas. )ome designs employed chemical saturations to produce greatly clarified and intensified signals. The revolutionary approach began as a chemical treatment to e8isting ground terminals& a treatment giving superior empirical results. Mhemically treated terminals brought a complete eradication of static. The chemical of choice for these 'treatments' was copper sulfate& the watery solution being liberally poured upon the buried terminal until the soil became a slurry. 2llowed to dry out& these terminals displayed their enormously improved outputs. <n other such e8perimental arrangements& copper sulfate solution was placed in a large porous cup. Montact was made with the solution with a metal rod. This design completely eliminated common static and other crac-ling noises& a significant improvement which also provided new insight into the nature of ground signals themselves. The performances of chemically treated ground antennas was not well comprehended& it being simply assumed that the earth0permeating solutions projected a conductive hori;on beyond the antenna itself. 3oured into the ground and allowed to dry in situ& such solutions were thought to e8tend a wonderfully articulate matri8 of 'fingerlets'

beyond the metallic antenna framewor-. Mrystalline& comple8& and replete with dendritic projections& such arrangements became dwoven into the earth'. >ow did such an underground crystalline comple8 manage to multiply signal conductivity& while depressing all of the e8pected levels of static= +nsheathing the metallic framewor-& the crystalli;ed solution represented a non0conductive envelope. >ow conductive was the crystalli;ed 'matri8' at all= +lectrically unresponsive in its dried crystalline form& any such copper sulfate sheath should have bloc-ed the entrance of all purely electrical currents. ?hat carrier was then delivering its obviously improved signals= This case study was completely corroborated in the simpler instance of an insulator0 ensheathed copper rod& where clarified signals of great strength continued to be received in obvious absence of the electrical carriers 97ehr& Therou8:. +8amples such as these actually challenge common notions concerning the nature of ground signals& obviously not the result of electrical waves at all. ?hen compared with the accompanying aerial signals& a contradiction in theoretical prediction was obtained. 2erial signals would prove to be replete with static signatures. ?ere the s-ywave and groundwave each coe1uals& lin-ed energetic e8pulsions from a common source& then each should have delivered the identical static events. Hut the addition of chemical solutions to the ground amplified and clarified the incoming signals& proving that ground signals are of an entirely different class and species of signal...having nothing to do with their aerial mirror0partners. >ow then did the addition of an electrically non0conductive crystalline matri8 actually produce better reception through the ground antenna=

BI"DDNA$I IN!E&A !I"N

The e8change between electrical signals and geomantic currents produced remar-able transformations& energy e8changes yet re1uiring e8haustive study. The manner in which articulate messages actively relate with their electrical carriers is improperly understood. <n the biodynamic model& intelligent e8pressions constrict toward the center core of their carrier streams& becoming a tight thready current. The electrical carrier streams themselves e8pand away from this central thready core& losing integrity with distance. <t was well -nown that certain geomantically densified regions were notorious eradicators of electrical signals& the legendary 'blindspots' which characteri;ed certain sube1uatorial districts. <n these biologically active ;ones& where jungle growth was most highly accelerated& radio signals encountered impossible distortions and indefinable interruptive influences.

The significant distinctions of ground0derived currents from electrostatic or electrical currents re1uired analytical methods not willingly engaged by the convention. ,evertheless& the incursions of un-nown or forgotten energy strata refused to disappear. These manifestations& which became complicated with electrical applications& made their presence continually -nown. These pure geomantic currents possessed distinctly biological attributes of catabolic growth. Geomantic energy perpetually overpowered and dissolved every electrical application into the ground 9catabolic reaction:& while automagnifying its own potential 9growth behavior: against the invasive electricity 9immune response:. <n this process& communications signals were very apparently amplified. The bi;arre amplifications most occurred when signals traversed regions of high geomantic current densities. This is why so many e8perimenters observed the topographically determined signal magnifications across specific locales. <n !"#4& one e8perimenter rediscovered that the bioactivity of thriving trees can provide an astounding source of radiosignals& a method referred to as 'floraphony'. ?hen connected to specific spots on tree trun-s& the use of a simple nail probe resulted in the anomalous powerful reception of radiosignals from !%&### miles distance 9)1uier:. <ndeed& the interactive relationship between electrical and geomantic energies has remained singularly mysterious. (or those who do not comprehend the fundamental differences and distinctions between the energies involved& only the futile shuffling and reshuffling of the 'four forces' remainsA an academic card game which& very unfortunately& will never produce a completely satisfying e8planation. The associated list of anomalies continues to assert its presence& one which manages to topple the house of cards with every new deal. The general social lac- of sensitivity to bioenergies has contributed to the malaise of the scientific research community& a malaise which motivated +ighteenth Mentury e8perimenters to forsa-e their roots in 4italism. The unfortunate conse1uent fi8ation on the discovery of currents and energetic influences& abnormal to the bionatural environment& has enslaved civili;ed humanity to an inferior technology& a degenerate mindstate& and a completely irrelevant world model. The interaction between geomantic and electrostatic current is the result of antagonism between two completely opposed species. Geomantic currents are far more powerful in their technological potentials& an energetic foundation which sensitives have long anticipated. The accumulation of phenomena& by which geomantic energies are transformed into the utilitarian needs of our world& are all that is lac-ing in this regard. Hy far not confined to 1ualitative methods& geomantic energy was 1uantitatively found to be possessed of biological characteristics not normally attributed to either electrostatic fields or electrical currents. (rom archane times& geomantic currents were -nown to flow through the ground in meandering pathways. The geomantic matching of large 47( aerials became common practice for the launching of signals along the mysterious magnifying paths& paths which meandered and 'wandered' across continental topographies. The veinli-e 'woivres'& formerly identified and mapped by

medieval geomancers& were associated with uncertain geophysical associations 9Mharpentier:. Firect connection with aerial& elemental& and ground0sourced energies produced a wide range of otherwise une8plained effects. These effects were repeatedly reproduced in apparatus re1uiring only monopolar ground terminals and variable tuning capacitors. 9*oray: The discoveries made by the Mhemical Telegraph proved that the ground emergent energy actively organi;es the chaos of sensitive emulsions into distinct patterns. These mystifying patterns and hunting fragmentary messages& revealed the literal 'dar- structure' of the ground& a structure which completely dominated every ground0launched electrical signal. The geomantic structure ruled and governed every wired& ground0wired& or radio signal which electrotechnology had applied to the ground. )ignals were shunted& interrupted& magnified& reduced& constricted& redirected& divided& and recombined as each encountered the geomantic structure. The distinctly biological nature of the geomantic structure was thus clearly revealed. <t is the same structure which ancient geomancers saw in the pure mode& a radiant and multicrystalline form which permeates and sustains the geological matter of earth. (luidic streams form the facets of this blac- radiant structure& the 'geomantic' currents of which we have spo-en. 9 The *oray connection: < started my e8periments with the ta-ing of electricity from the ground as < termed it& during the summer of !"#". Hy the fall of !"!# < had sufficient power to operate small electrical devices and made a demonstration of my ideas to two friends. These demonstrations consisted of operating a miniature arc light. +8plorations of the pure geomantic energies re1uired very simple e1uipment. Iesearchers found it possible to e8tract enormously potent geomantic currents. +mploying little more than a grounded rod or plate& and in the complete absence of additional 9electrical: energy& geomantic energy was drawn up to the surface and selectively entuned. The grounded instruments used in these wonderful e8plorations were the simple and familiar diagnostic tools of the telegraphic and telephonic engineersA ?heatstone Hridges& decade resistors& and variable capacitance batteries. The strange and cyclic activation of chemical telegraphs was tested and proven& the results mystifying. ?hen these components were connected to one or more buried plates& the apparatus became strangely charged with a neutral energy. The 3atent 2rchive is pleasantly 'interrupted' with the occasional e8ceptions provided by these research purists& who insisted that geomantic potentials were far more potent and capable than electrical energy. Those ground0oriented systems& which derive their operative energy directly from articulate environment& have e8perimentally proven their worth. Ieproductions of a great many such devices has produced the surprising success by which we have e8perienced a personal )cientific Ienaissance. Geomantic energy is capable of mar-ing sensitive chemical papers and plates 9Hain& +dison:& of stimulating auric emissions from elements and chemicals 9Ieichenbach:& of mar-ing photographic plates 9Fobler:& of stimulating plant growth 9?hite:& of vivifying otherwise

incapacitated patients 92brams:& of impressing and modifying sensitive crystalli;ation processes 9 olis-o:& is able to see- and reveal deeply buried ore bodies 9Frown& Iogers:& and is capable of more astounding displays. <ts preeminent potentials dwarf those achieved through the use of electrical charge. Femonstrating a distinct bioaffinity& geomantic currents evidence selective preference for biological matter and for bioorganisms 9?hite& 2brams& 7ahovs-y:. 3ossessing articulate 'behavior'& whose definition e8ceeds that crude behavior of electrical currents& geomantic currents are able to selectively see- and locate specific widely distributed tuning targets with complete precision. ,on0inertial& and characteri;ed by innate properties which may only be termed 'biological'& geomantic currents represent an energetic stratum at the most fundamental level. The world foundation. ?as it any wonder that ground antennas performed in e8cess of all the electrodynamic predictions=

&ADI"NI G&"UND EN!UNE$EN!

Fiscovered during the years when the communications sciences of Telegraphy& Telephony& Monduction ?ireless& and 2erial ?ireless were being developed& the isolation and implementation of Geomantic +nergy has founded the core of a new )cience. >aving thoroughly accepted the objective e8istence of Geomantic Murrents& the Iadionists e8tended the -nown list of attributes and potentials germane to these energetic species. Iadionists developed instruments& methods& and technologies beyond the e8pected conventional limits. Their diagnostic instruments become recogni;ed as 'tuners' or 'filters' of the geomantic currents. ?ith refined entunement components& the effects became more pronounced and defined. The now familiar use of resistance or capacitance bridges in Iadionic Technology has not been significantly changed since the days of telegraph line diagnostic instruments. Monsidered to be 'electrically dead' by other academes& and therefore supposedly incapable of dynamic activity& the diagnostic apparatus of Iadionists were derided by those who refused the acceptance of vitalistic energy on conditions of personal prejudice alone. Hut the natural phenomenon defied the edicts of those who refused to -now. Iadionically entuned radio receivers became enormously powerful sites into which impossibly distant signals of e8ceedingly weaintensities simply pour. To e8perience the numerous phenomena typical for reception through ground antennas is to e8perience the technically 'impossible'. Qtili;ed in a great variety of investigative purposes& the ac1uisition of geomantic energies was fortunately chronicled in a great number of patents and articles. Iadionists discovered that Geomantic energy is neutral& being possessed of an ability to modify and organi;e chemically chaotic systems 97ittlefield& *orley0*artin& olis-o:. 3ure geomantic energy articulates and transforms mineral solutions into prebiological organi;ations 9Mrosse& Hastian& Ieich:. The characteristic which draws

geomantic currents into bioorganisms has been e8plored for use as a therapeutic stimulant 9?hite& Frown:. Greatly increased vitality is the result of e8posures to these ground derived currents& an echoing reminder of truths early discovered by *esmer and Galvani. Ground derived energies were used in demonstration of agricultural stimulation 9?hite& 7a-hovs-y:& sensitive medical diagnosis 9?hite& 2brams& >ieronymus:& medical therapies 9?hite& *ellon& Frown:& anatomical scanning 9Frown& Fela?arr:& wireless biological communications 92brams& >ieronymus& Frown:& chemical reactivity 9 olis-o:& power ac1uisition 9)tubblefield& )trong& Hrown& Tom-ins& 7oc-wood& 3rentice:& meteorological modification 9Haigorri:& remote sensing and surveying 9Heasse& Gla;ews-i& Hillington& 2sh& Iogers& *oray& *aby& Frown:& and mineral prospecting 9Heasse& Iogers& Frown:. Fespite these profound discoveries& the widescale acceptance of geomantic energy or geomantic phenomena was methodically shunned and eliminated from the academic dogma. Fespite the vindictive treatment& that displayed in the purgative fury of several national agencies& the legendary Iadionists developed a wondrous new technology which yet holds the future survival of humanity. This superlative Iadionic Technology& capable of stimulating and engaging the very deepest of human potentials& has neither been glimpsed or considered since *edieval times. <n the secrets of Iadionic )cience are the means by which the very deepest dreams and desires of humanity find technological e8pression. <mplementing pure geomantic energies& Iadionic <nstrumentalities operate at the very level from which dreams and desires emerge. ?ith the energies obtained up from the ground& we have discovered a se1uence of distinct& irreducible& and articulate attributes& to which both our thoughts and efforts have been continually directed. The all too numerous e8periments which researchers have conducted remain forever framed in this biodynamic perspective. ?ith each attempt at duplicating the supposed fraudulent claims of our 1ualitatively inclined predecessors& we continue to rediscover spectacular anomalies. 3roviding us with a continual stream of scientific epiphanies& we have enjoyed remar-able success. *oving in and among such strange scientific topics& you may also venture among deep roadways untravelled by most. <n truth& these deepest of studies prove the e8istence of a superlative visionary world0reality& one whose thralldom society must again admit. Moupled with the most elementary of ground antennas& any ordinary shortwave receiver becomes a powerful diagnostic tool. ?ith very simple e1uipment& one obtains a glowing window on the innermost world processes whose biodynamic activities rule our very being. The diagnostic use of ground radio antennas& has permitted the ac1uisition of wonderful and mind0elevating secrets. Dne continually learns the lost details inherent in our throbbing world. The geomantic structure& whose pulsing streams and ebbing tides govern our consciousness& is suddenly revealed through the turn of a radio dial. Qnreconciled audio 'observations' provide

compelling evidence that ours is a world alive& whose meandering flowlines display both emotive reactions and intelligent behavior. Mareful interpretation of ground radio phenomena has permitted us to add new details to the evergrowing biodynamic world thesis. <ndeed& with every e8periment we have performed& there is a vast and oceanic flood of new facts and e1ually new associations. <t is with these revelations we find ourselves wonderfully occupied. ,ow comprising a formidable and growing treasury& we recogni;e that the duplication of such past methodologies well serves our willingness to see-. Ground0connected shortwave receivers are radionic interaction chambers& where pure geomantic power meets with electricity. +mploying the receiver components as surreptitious radionic instruments& we have found an astounding se1uence of corroborative facts in a singular theme.

.ules Merpau8 Dctober 3& !%6$

?elcome to Hedini Technology

?e at Hedini Technology& <nc. have developed energy systems for many years& since the early !"6#'s. ?e have openly shared many of these discoveries on the pages of this website since the beginning of the internet. Fue to recent events& it is becoming increasingly clear thata growing number of peopleare using ideas from this website& and infringing on my patents without even the courtesy of giving me credit.
We will explain the BTI negative resistor process for taking extra energy from the vac m! "or simplicity# the process will $e pro% ce% in a common lea% aci% storage $attery! "irst we will explain the necessary $ackgro n% to n%erstan% this process!

An open thermo%ynamic system s ch as a win%mill receives energy from its active environment! S ch a system can change its own potential energy as more win% energy is receive%! It can also power itself an%aloa% s ch as a p mp to provi%e water!

The open system can re&or%er itself! It can self&oscillate or self&rotate! It can o tp t more energy than the operator inp ts# $eca se the environment f rnishes extra energy! Like the win%mill# it can power itself an% its loa% sim ltaneo sly! It exhi$its what is calle% 'negentropy(! That is# it increases its energy as it receives more energy from its environment! "or example# the win%mill increases its energy as the win% $lows more strongly!

To relate to electrical systems# we can regar% the win%mill as a 'negative resistor( since it accepts n sa$le win% energy from the environment an% transforms it to shaft horsepower to power the loa% )the p mp*! In other wor%s# a negative resistor receives energy from the environment in a form not sa$le $y the working loa%! It trans% cers the energy into sa$le form $y re&or%ering it# an% then f rnishes the sa$le energy to the loa% to power it an% %o work for s!

"or over +,, years# conventional electrical systems have $een %esigne% as e- ili$ri m systems! They are symmetrical with their active vac m environment! They give right $ack to the vac m any energy they receive from it! With those systems we have to p t in all the energy we get o t an% se! We m st also inp t some a%%itional energy to cover losses in the system! The ratio of o tp t to inp t is less than one! We say that these systems have a coefficient of performance or ./0 less than one! We also refer to them as ' n%er nity( systems!

Nearly 1, years ago# particle physicists %iscovere% that the symmetry of an electrical system with the active vac m can $e $roken! So a sort of 'win%mill( electrical system# in a vac m energy win%# is permitte%! S ch a system wo l% $e powere% $y vac m energy! W an% his colleag es# an% Lee as well# receive% No$el 0ri2es for this an% relate% work! 0rigogine later receive% a No$el 0ri2e for his contri$ tions to s ch systems! 3owever# electrical engineers still %esign power systems with a +45 year ol% E6 theory which has not $een change%! The theory %oes not incl %e extracting an% sing electrical energy from the active vac m! / r engineers contin e to %esign power systems the ol% way!

Any %ipole is a $roken symmetry in the vac m energy fl x! So the common %ipole 7 simply separating positive an% negative charges 7 provi%es a negative resistor! The potential )i!e!# voltage* $etween the two en%s is a novel energy flow circ lation# as shown $y Whittaker in +8,4! Energy from the vac m 7 in the complex plane or what the engineer calls 'reactive power( 7 is contin ally a$sor$e% $y the charges on the en%s of the %ipole! The charges trans% ce the a$sor$e% reactive power is into real electrical power# which then po rs o t from the %ipole in all %irections! This g shing energy from the vac m will contin e while the %ipole lasts! We only have to 'pay( once# for initially making the %ipole! "or example# %ipoles in or%inary matter have $een po ring o t energy extracte% from the vac m# for some +1 $illion years!

Batteries an% generators %o not power their attache% circ its9 They expen% their availa$le internal energy )shaft energy inp t to the generator# an% chemical energy in the $attery* to force their own internal charges apart# making a so rce %ipole! That is ALL that $atteries an% generators %o! They %o not place a single watt of power on the external circ it# nor %o they power any loa%! Instea%# from Whittaker:s work in +8,4# the %ipole receives vac m energy )reactive power*# trans% ces it into real power# an% contin o sly po rs o t that energy along the circ it# filling all space! The circ it intercepts a tiny $it of that energy flow# an% powers the loa%! Every electrical loa% an% circ it is powere% $y electrical energy extracte% from the vac m! All electrical loa%s are powere% $y vac m energy to%ay!

All the hy%rocar$ons ever $ rne%# all the f el ro%s ever se%# all the %ams ever $ ilt to t rn generator shafts# etc! have not a%%e% a single watt to the power line! All that enormo s effort has %one nothing $ t make power system %ipoles! Sa%ly# o r engineers have always ma%e systems so they kill the %ipole faster than they can power their loa%s! So with these archaic systems we have to contin e to $ rn f el# $ il% n clear power plants# etc! ; st to remake the %ipoles o r systems contin ally %estroy! Simply p t# that is not the way to r n the railroa%! The Be%ini process repeate%ly pro% ces a negative resistor insi%e a $attery or other energy storage %evice for free# or nearly so! /nce the negative resistor is momentarily esta$lishe%# a $last of energy leaps from the vac m onto the charges in the $attery an% onto the charges in the circ it# which are flash charge% with excess energy! The $attery is recharge% an% the loa% is powere% sim ltaneo sly!

The Be%ini process repeate%ly pro% ces a negative resistor insi%e a $attery or other energy storage %evice for free# or nearly so! /nce the negative resistor is momentarily esta$lishe%# the energy leaps from the vac m onto the $attery# which are charge% with excess energy! The $attery is recharge% an% the loa% is powere% sim ltaneo sly!

A typical system approach is to power the system from one $attery# while a secon% $attery or gro p of them is on 'charge( from the negative resistor process! Then the powering $attery is switche% an% the loa% powere% from another one# so that the original $attery can $e charge% very rapi%ly!

Iteration keeps all $atteries charge% while contin ing to f lly power the loa%! A typical <. o tp t may $e converte% into stan%ar% A. in an or%inary <.&to&A. converter# e!g! to power one:s home! The Be%ini process will give $irth to very %ifferent# %ecentrali2e% electrical power systems taking their electrical energy %irectly from the local active vac m!

We ill strate the enormo s amo nt of energy that any %ipole act ally converts from the vac m an% o tp ts! 3ere is one of the con% ctors )wires* attache% to one terminal of a generator or $attery! A large wave flow s rro n%s the wire# o t to an infinite ra%ial %istance! This shows the enormo s energy flow that is po ring o t of the terminals! This is real E6 power! As can $e seen# most of it misses the circ it entirely an% is ; st waste%! In the wire# we see the free electrons $o ncing aro n%# coming to the s rface# an% intercepting a tiny $it of the passing energy flow 7 m ch like placing yo r han% o t of the win%ow of a moving car an%%iverting some of the passing air flow into the interior! In this wire# only that tiny# tiny $it of energy flow %eflecte% into the wire is se% to power the electrons# pro% ce c rrent# an% power the circ it! As yo can see# every circ it has always $een powere% $y the little $it it is a$le to catch from an enormo s passing energy flow! The entire large energy flow is extracte% from the vac m $y the so rce %ipole an% po re% o t of the terminals!

In this animation we show how the energy is receive% $y the %ipole from the vac m as reactive power! The charges then transform their a$sor$e% energy into real sa$le power an% po r it o t prof sely! An enormo s flow of real E6 energy res lts! We m st now have a circ it which intercepts an% collects some of that h ge# g shing energy flow# an% %issipates the collecte% energy in loa%s! As can $e seen# if we make the %ipole stronger# we increase the energy flow! If we %iminish an% %estroy the %ipole# we %iminish an% then %estroy the g shing E6 energy from the vac m! So then we m st pay to restore the %ipole!

This animation shows how the Be%ini process in a $attery forms a negative resistor# which extracts an% f rnishes vac m energy! The electron c rrent can only move $etween the o tsi%e of the plates o t into an% thro gh the external circ it! Between the plates# a very heavy lea% ion c rrent sl ggishly moves! A p lse of electrons piles imme%iately p on the e%ge of the plates# trying to p sh the lea% ions in charging mo%e!

The ions move very slowly# so that electrons contin e to pile p! The %ensity of the electron pile p pro% ces a s %%en large potential 7 a %ipolarity! As we showe%# this %ipolarity pro% ces a s %%en $last of m ch&increase% E6 energy flow across the ions# a%%ing m ch greater energy to them! At the same time# the $last of E6 energy also travels o t into the external circ it# %riving the electrons to power the loa%! In short# momentarily this +=&volt circ it has $een freely converte% to a +,,&volt circ it! Its availa$le power has $een increase% $y a factor of > or more!

As the p lse of electron pile& p potential is c t off# the well&known Len2 law reaction is evoke%! This momentarily s- ee2es the electron pile p even more# s %%enly raising the voltage to ?,, volts! This f rther increases the availa$le power $y an a%%itional factor of ? or more! So the circ it now has some 4= or more times as m ch power as it initially ha% from the $attery alone! The collection of the excess energy from the 'charging( of the overpotential occ rs on the ions charging the $attery# an% also on the external circ it electrons powering the loa%! The system has $een $laste% open an% is receiving a great s rge of energy from the vac m! It receives this excess energy from the %ipole acting as a tr e negative resistor! As an analogy# we have converte% the system into a sort of 'win%mill( an% triggere% the vac m into provi%ing a very powerf l set of win%&$lasts to power the win%mill!

This animation shows the operation of a typical Be%ini power system %riving a rotary motor )center* an% charging a $ank of $atteries )top* from a $attery )left si%e*! The negative resistor process )shown $y the $ $$les* in the $attery at the left is contin ally triggere%! The 'energy( is se% to f rther trigger the negative resistor process in each $attery in the $ank at the top! An A. to <. inverter is connecte% to the $attery $ank# so that stan%ar% A. power is o tp t to the normal electrical wiring system of the ho se# office# etc! As can $e seen# the $attery an% charging systems are se% to extract excess energy from the vac m# convert it to sa$le <. form# an% collect it! Then the converter changes it to proper A. form to power the ho se A.# while sim ltaneo sly the motor is $eing powere%! In a%%ition# the precise timing an% switching for the charging of the system with vac m energy is mechanically $ ilt into a motor system !

This animation shows how the motor@timer@switcher can $e arrange% in $anks to %ramatically increase the shaft horsepower! At the same time# a%%itional $anks of $atteries or other acc m lators can $e contin ally charge%# so that an entire neigh$orhoo% or a large office $ il%ing can $e powere% $y the system:s larger A. converter not shown! The o tp t can power any shaft horsepower loa% re- ire%! In the f t re# an a%aptation of this approach can power transport vehicles s ch as a tomo$iles# tr cks# trains# $oats# etc!

This a tomation shows a typical home with an installe% Be%ini power system! 3ere the $atteries are tili2e% as negative resistors an% acc m lators! A stan%ar% <. to A. converter is also powere%# so that stan%ar% A. power is f rnishe% to the main power panel of the home! All the s al home appliances an% loa%s are powere% in normal fashion! This home is imm ne to power o tages from storms# $lown transformers# s $station fail res# $rowno ts# or $lacko ts! Everything is powere% $y electrical energy o$taine% %irectly from the active vac m!

In this segment we show an act al la$ test mo%el that %emonstrates the principles of the Be%ini process! The main $attery is here )point* an% yo can see the motor here! The motor is %oing work $y operating a fan $la%e an% p mping air! Acc m lators are locate% here )point* in which

energy from the proprietary Be%ini transformer )point* is $eing c m latively collecte% eight times for each revol tion! /nce per revol tion# precise switching )point* %ischarging of the acc m lator transformer into the secon%ary $attery )point* to charge it! In this arrangement# we show proof of principle $y contin o sly %oing work )p mping air* while contin o sly keeping the secon%ary $attery charge%! 0erio%ically the $atteries are switche% an% the former primary $attery is charge%! The excess energy comes %irectly from the active vac m# thro gh the negative resistor in the $attery create% $y the Be%ini process! In a%%ition# we are %emonstrating a%%itional energy $eing o$taine% from excess collection in the transformer )point* eight times per rotation# an% fe% into the $attery once per revol tion to recharge the secon%ary $attery! Another principle shown $y this system is the s perpolarity of the magnetic motor )point*! The magnets all have north poles pointing o twar%! The compression an% rep lsion in the mi%%le of any two poles creates a north pole whose fiel% strength is several times larger than the fiel% strength from each magnet! Th s we have forme% eight 'phantom poles(# to %ramatically increase the fiel% energy %ensity in the magnetic fiel% where the special transformer )point* collects a%%itional energy )from the s perpole fl x c tting one of the coils# eight times per revol tion of the rotor! The energy is collecte% in a acc m lator transformer)point* an% once per revol tion it charges the secon%ary $attery ! The system %emonstrates that the vac m energy can $e collecte% in several places an% in %ifferent ways# collecte% in a proprietary acc m lator transformer# an% then se% to very powerf lly form a s %%en negative resistor in the $attery )point*!

This charges the $attery with a%%itional energy from the vac

m as previo sly explaine%!

The electrical energy nee%s of the worl% are increasing exponentially! At the same time# the worl%:s oil s pplies are peaking an% will $e gra% ally %ecreasing# while $ecoming ever more expensive to o$tain! The easily foreseea$le res lt is first a worl% energy crisis# now looming# followe% $y a worl% economic crisis as prices of transportation# goo%s# etc! increases! The Be%ini Negative resistor process can resolve this crisis that is coming pon s! With Be%ini systems an% technology# the increasing nee% for oil can $e $l nte% an% controlle%# so that the economylevels off while at the same time a%%itional electrical power is provi%e% as nee%e%!

The BTI processes an% systems pose no threat to the environment! By $l nting an% leveling hy%rocar$on com$ stion to pro% ce the increasing electrical power nee%e%# these BTI systems will %ramatically re% ce the environmental poll tion an% %amage that wo l% otherwise occ r! The processes pro% ce clean electrical power# %o not re- ire rivers# special con%itions for win%mills an% solar cells# hy%rocar$on com$ stion# or n clear f el ro% cons mption! The BTI systems can $e place% anywhere on earth# $eneath the earth# in space# or n%er the ocean:s s rface! They will provi%e clean# cheap electrical energy anywhere# anytime# everywhere# an% every time with no %etrimental impact to the environment! In a%%ition# their nat ral %ecentrali2ation eliminates fail re of entire power gri%s or large sections of it# whether the ca se is nat ral or manma%e BTI is c rrently working on a%%itional %esigns that will pro% ce more power on %eman% an% - ite flexi$ly! These systems are a%apta$le to almost any electrical power system application# from p mping water# powering high spee% t r$ines# etc! The potential for replacing almost every inefficient electrical motor with regenerative systems is o$vio s! 6ost in% strial an% cons mer applications can $e met $y Be%ini systems# more economically# cleaner# cheaper# an% far more efficiently! .ompare% to other systems# a BTI power system will always se less an% pro% ce more in the same application# an% %o it cleanly an% witho t poll tion!

The company has $een grante% patent protection an% the Be%ini processes are patente% ! Worl%wi%e protection is in process an% will $e %iligently maintaine% % ring the patent process! BTI will also $e filing many a%%itional patents as the technology f rther %evelops to exten% an% complement the two processes! Ao have witnesse% what we at BTI $elieve to $e the %awn of a revol tionary new age of efficient an% clean electric power! 0ro% cing energy at a fraction of its present cost# %epen%a$ly an% relia$ly# an% %oing it easily an% anywhere# will revol tioni2e the present systems with their wastes an% poll tion! The BTI power systems will provi%e a never&en%ing so rce for electrical power an% energy so %esperately nee%e% $y all the peoples an% nations of the earth! 0rovi%ing an% maintaining a sec re# safe# clean f t re of plentif l electrical power is o r goal an% hopef lly yo rs as well!

Beep The Lights /n We at Be%ini Technology# Inc! wishes to thank yo for viewing o r scrolling presentation! 0lease view o r main page for f rther information!

The Tom Bear%en "ree Energy .ollector 0rinciple

In the paper C The "inal Secret of "ree Energy C wrote in "e$r ary 8# +884# Tom Bear%en has %escri$e% the principle of a %evice which seems a$le to tap "ree Energy from the energy flow ) the 0oynting S&"low * in the vacc m % ring the short transient phase ) the relaxation time in a con% ctor * when a so rce is connecte% to a resistive loa%! In this paper# I am trying to clarify a $it# the $asic concept of this principle!

Tom Bear%en claims that when a So rce ) a %ipole * is connecte% to a resistive loa%# the most important part of the principle is the information transfere% to the loa% at the spee% of light $y the S&"low! The S&"low is p re E6 energy which flows thro gh the space an% o tsi%e the con% ctor! This energy is "ree an% only this part m st $e se% as a Cfree l nchC! D st after this very short time# after that the switch is close% ) the transient phase *# the c rrent $egins to flow in the circ it! This transient phase is name% the Relaxation Time! In copper# the relaxation time is incre%i$ly rapi%# itEs a$o t +!1 x +,&+8 sec! When the c rrent flows ) the permanent phase *# the circ it cons mes power from the So rce an% %issipates energy $y Do leEs Effet# this phase m st not $e se% in o r case! So# accor%ing to Tom Bear%en# for tapping "ree Energy# the p rpose is to charge a C .ollector C % ring its relaxation time an% then# to switch this .ollector to a common resistive loa%# ; st $efore that the electrons $egin to flow in the circ it! <<)e took some tra""ed *+ energy density ,a chunk of "otential gradient, a (!oltage( before current flows- from the source, by switching that "otential gradient ,energy density, which is .oules "er coulomb- onto a collector ,containing a certain number of coulombs of tra""ed charges- where the "otential gradient acti!ates/"otentializes/cou"les#to these tem"orarily non translating electrons. 0o the finite collector collected a finite amount of e1cess energy 2.oules/coulomb 1 collecting ,tra""ed- coulombs3 on its now#e1cited ,acti!ated- free electrons. hen, before any current has yet flowed from the source, we switched that "otentialized collector ,with its tem"orarily restrained but "otentialized electrons4 with their finite amount of e1cess tra""ed *+ energy- away from the source and directly across the load. 0hortly thereafter, the rela1ation time in the collector e1"ires. he "otentialized electrons in the collector are freed to mo!e in the e1ternal load circuit, consisting of the collector and the load, and so they do so. 55 has said om $earden. "or the .ollector it is necessary to se a con% ctive material which has a longer relaxation time than in the copper! This is only for the electronic circ it %esign an% the limitation of its components! So# Tom Bear%en has se% C a <egenerate Semicon% ctor C which has a relaxation time of a$o t + ms! The .ollector is ma%e with 8>F Al min m an% =F Iron! GG <egenerate semicon% ctor H

( heavily doped semiconductor in which the $ermi level is located in either the valence band or the conduction band 3see energy band 4 causing the material to $ehave as a metal!RR3Source : XRefer : A Dictionary of Science, Oxford University Press ) ( conductor contains large number of loosely bound electrons which we call free electrons or conduction electrons. The remaining material is collection of heavy positive ions called lattice. These ions keeps on vibrating about their mean positions. The average amplitude of vibration depends upon temperature. 1ccasionally, a free electron collides interacts in some other fashion with the lattice. The speed and direction of electron changes randomly at each such event. (s a result electrons moves in a ,ig5,ag path....The average time between two successive collisions in a conductor is called the relaxation time. 3 see at D httpDGGwww.schooljunction.comGcurrent.htm 4 RR

GGRelaxation time D

The Bear%enEs .ollector is charge% $y sing a Stepwise .harging metho% with a ramp voltage generator# this is commonly se% in high efficiency an% low power cons mption .6/S systems which se an Adiabatic Charging method ) see .harge Recycling .locking for A%iat$atic Style Logic by Luns Tee, Lizhen Zheng ). With this Ste !ise Charging method very few energy is re- ire% for charging the .ollector! If the .ollector is a common capacitor the efficiency is nearly close to +,,F! With the Bear%enEs .ollector# this metho% is se% only for transfering the potential! The ramp % ration of the voltage m st $e less than the relaxation time of the .ollector se%! So# there is no c rrent flow in the circ it ) %I@%t J , * % ring the charging se- ence! When the .ollector is f lly charge%# all the free electrons are Cpotentiali2e%C# they have their own kinetic energy gaine% $y the potential only pro% ce% $y the S&"low! The next step is to se these Cpotentiali2e% electrons C$y switching the circ it on the Loa%# now# the .ollector acts as a "ree So rce of Energy# it acts as a %ipole energi2e% $y only the S&"low of the original so rce ) K+ in the %iagram $elow*!!!!!

, his diagram has been u"dated on 6uly 11, &771 according to the latest comments from om $earden , see below - -

I hope that# with this short %escription# I have $een a$le to clarify a $it the Tom Bear%enEs C "inal Secret of "ree Energy C! Now# only a real working %evice will prove if his claim can $e more than a simple over nity %ream!!!

So rce %oc ments H The "inal Secret of "ree Energyby Tom "earden
Thomas Bear%en Answers Derry <ecker on "ree Energy 2erry, 0 only have time every so many weeks to try to answer such #uestions. 0*ll take some time to try to give you a complete answer, but do not wish to enter into protracted discussions etc. 0*m on a very reduced schedule anyway, because of the illness, and so only have a little time to spare at infre#uent intervals. @ou will never have the answer to the true negative resistor problem or understand it, until you read the physics literature and study something beside standard classical electrodynamics and electrical engineering. Those disciplines and models completely forbid any !1.R9.< system, and any true negative resistor is a !1. S infinity system. %1 7'(T U%T )E !'(&6E= 18 1=0$0E= 0& T'1%E E (&= EE 1=E+%, 0$ 1&E 0% T1 E/E& '(/E ( !1.R9.< %@%TE (T (++" (nyone who is not struggling with that problem, has no business calling himself in the "free energy field". 'e*s not. 'e*s automatically in the "7ell, it*s not in conventional EE, so 0 can*t understand it" field. EE is based on a very archaic and seriously flawed E model that does not permit !1.R9.< circuits and systems. uch better electrodynamics models have long been available in particle physics 55 for the simple reason that the standard EE does not ade#uately describe nature. The answer to many of your #uestions and speculations are already there in particle physics, and have been for a long time. )ut one has to read the physics literature. %adly, most of the "free energy" community will not read the literature, will not go look up and read a cited reference or #uotation, etc. and try to understand it. %o there exists a "mindset" in the free energy community, which largely regurgitates classical electrodynamics and standard electrical engineering, )1T' 1=E+% of which specifically prohibit !1.R9.< E systems in the first place> (s an example, to do !1.R9.< in an E circuit, that circuit has to violate the second law of thermodynamics. 7here is the discussion in the "free energy" community about that, and how to do it" $urther, it has to violate the standard closed5current5loop circuit, and it has to violate the arbitrary +orent, symmetrical regauging of the axwell5'eaviside e#uations. 7here are the fruitful discussions of the methods for doing those two things" 7ell, most do not +0-E such areas. %orry, but those are the areas that one must grapple with, if one wishes to grapple with overunity processes and mechanisms. 0f the gold is on the right side of the fence and one persists in looking only on the left side, one should not be surprised that he never finds the gold. 7e have to take physics as it comes on its own terms. 7e

simply cannot dictate what the physics "ought to be", but only try to find out "what it is". 1ne can point out answers and the exact citations from physics, and we*ve done that in spades. Then if the community still will not deviate from !E and EE, and will not discuss the technical re#uirements for a !1.R9.< system, then all further discussions with the community are useless. @et strangely, those who have never even seen an overunity system or circuit, much less tested one, seem to assume that they already completely understand the entire field that is not yet even a field. erely because they understand !E or electrical engineering> 7hen 0 wrote the paper on how )edini is able to generate a true negative resistor at the boundary 3inner surface of the plates4 inside a battery, for the conference that year in 8ussia, 0 specifically asked the 8ussian scientists to first subject the paper and its explanation to rigorous analysis, to find if there were any flaws. (fter that refereeing check was performed by some excellent 8ussian scientists, the answer came back that the paper was okay and would stand up, and was recommended for publication. 7hereupon 0 submitted the paper to them for presentation in absentia, and for publication in the proceedings. @ou are aware, 0 think, that there is no real contiguous closed electron current loop in a battery powered circuit, contrary to the standard circuit diagram. 0nstead, there are two very different current half5loopsD 394 the ion current between the plates, completely internal to the battery, and 3B4 the electron current half loop, from the outside of one plate through the external circuit to the outside of the other plate. The mass per unit charge of the lead ions in a battery is enormously greater 3several hundred thousand times greater4 than the mass per unit charge of the electrons. %o the electrons respond very much faster than the sluggish ions. Ergo, one can readily dephase the two currents, because of the sluggishness of the ions compared to the rapidity of the electrons. .iece of cake, with the proper timing. &ow to pauseD suppose you set a "scalar" potential upon the middle of a transmission line. 0t doesn*t sit there like a "scalar" entity at all> 0nstead, it takes off in both directions simultaneously, like two scalded hogs, nearly at the speed of light. 0t potentiali,es the charges in one direction almost instantly and it also potentiali,es the charge in the other direction almost instantly. .+E(%E &1TE T'(T T'E !'(86E% T1 T'E +E$T '(/E ( $18!E T1 T'E +E$T !8E(TE= 1& T'E , (&= T'E !'(86E% T1 T'E 806'T '(/E ( $18!E T1 T'E 806'T !8E(TE= 1& T'E . 0f you catch the ions in the charging mode, you can thus reverse the electron current in the external circuit with overpotentiali,ed electrons, while simultaneously overpotentiali,ing the ions in charging mode. This means that excess energy is delivered to powering the external circuit, while excess energy is simultaneously delivered to the ions in charging mode. 0t*s as simple as that.

icrowave switching engineer )ill &elson and engineer 8on !ole had absolutely no difficulty in reproducing the )edini process in the 9:K<s. &either did 2im 7atson, who later developed and demonstrated an K -7device.

&ow suppose you suddenly place a potential on the surface of the plates 3between the two plates4 of a battery. That potential takes off like a scalded hog in both directions. 0t flows across the ions in the battery between the plates in one direction, and simultaneously it flows out into the external circuits to "push the charges" in the other direction. 0n short, if you time things correctly, you can =E.'(%E and =E!1U.+E the two currents in the battery powered system, simultaneously adding potential energy to both of them, "for free". @ou can add potential to )1T' the ions and the electrons. The ions can be moving backward in charging mode, while the electrons will be driven in the opposite direction in the external circuit 555 in powering direction. )efore one gets bent out of shape about the potential being regauging and all that, and free additional potential energy and all that, one should go look up what the "gauge freedom" axiom of #uantum field theory means. (ll electrodynamicists 555 and even the electrical engineers 555 assume that the potential energy of any axwellian system can be freely changed at will. 'owever, they usually assume you will be a gentleman and do it twice simultaneously, and will also do it just exactly so that the two new free E forces produced in the system are e#ual and opposite. 7ell, that assumes that you take in free excess potential energy to the system, but precisely lock it up so that it cannot translate electrons and therefore push current and do work in an external load. 'owever, it continuously performs what is called "internal work" in the system, in opposing directions but e#ual magnitude. That work continually forms and maintains excess "stress energy" in the system, and that is all. %o the first problem for a !1.R9.< system is how to break up that "stress energy only" assumption. 2ohn*s way is one way. 'e actually "splits" the potential into two directional fields 3which it is? see 7hittaker 9:<;, cited in numerous of my papers4, one going in one direction to push the ions in charging mode, and the other going in the other direction out into the external circuit to push electrons in powering mode. That*s about as simple as it can be explained. (t that point, one either understands it or one doesn*t. (lso, bear in mind that from any non,ero scalar potential phi, regardless of how small in magnitude, you can collect as much energy as you wish, if you just have enough charge available to intercept it. That*s the simple e#uation 7 S 3phi4#, where 7 is the amount of energy collected in joules from potential phi, by charges # in coulombs. $or a given phi and a desired 7, just include the necessary #. ( potential is a set of bidirectional rivers of flowing energy, as proven by 7hittaker in 9:<;. 7e do not have to 8E.81/E that at all? it*s already well known and accepted by every electrodynamicist worth his salt.

(ny potential is automatically a true negative resistor, since it is a free harmonic set of bidirectional flows of E energy 3due to its dipolarity and the broken symmetry of same? it takes the energy right out of the vacuum via the broken symmetry of the source charge or dipolarity4. 'ence you can collect as much energy from it as you wish, from its "flowing rivers of energy", if you arrange for enough charges 3buckets4 to collect it 3to collect the water4. &othing says you have to use just one kind of charge 3the electron4. @ou can use 55 as )edini does 55 both the ions between the plates and the electrons in the external circuit. (nd you can use them both, and potentiali,e them both simultaneously with the same potential. '17 U!' EH!E%% E&E86@ @1U !(T!' 0& )1T' =08E!T01&% =E.E&=% %1+E+@ 1& T'E (6&0TU=E 1$ T'E .'0 (&= T'E (6&0TU=E 1$ T'E I*s. There*s no mystery as to how he makes a negative resistor, because (&@ (&= E/E8@ =0.1+(80T@ (&= .1TE&T0(+ (8E (+8E(=@ T8UE &E6(T0/E 8E%0%T18%. (s is every charge. The energy flows are coming freely from the vacuum, via the proven 3in particle physics, &1T in EE4 broken symmetry of the source charge and source dipole. 8emember, the first re#uirement for an overunity system or true negative resistor is T1 6ET 1UT 1$ !+(%%0!(+ E+E!T81=@&( 0!% (&= E+E!T80!(+ E&60&EE80&6. 0f one cannot think outside those boxes, one will never get or understand overunity, because 0T 0% !1 .+ETE+@ 1UT%0=E T'1%E T71 )1HE%. Every charge in the universe is already a true negative resistor of the purest and most definitive 3and easily demonstrated experimentally4 kind. 0t freely absorbs virtual photons from the seething vacuum, transduces that into 1)%E8/()+E 3real, detectable, usable4 photons, and pours them out in all directions in ;5space at the speed of light. 1ne doesn*t have to reprove that? it*s been proven in physics since 9:CF. @ou want to make a true (!81%!1.0! negative resistor for peanuts" 2ust lay a charged capacitor on a permanent magnet so that the E field of the cap is at right angles to the '5field of the magnet. That optimi,es EH', which is the expression for the .oynting energy flow % S f3EH'4. That silly thing sits there and steadily pours out real observable usable E energy EH' at the speed of light, with no 1)%E8/()+E electromagnetic energy input into it. The fact that it is a continuous flow of energy is usually just "mumbled away"? e.g., with some version of this #uotationD "L.oynting*s resultM implies that a charged capacitor in a constant magnetic field which is not parallel to the electric field is the seat of energy flows even though all macroscopic phenomena are static." L2ed J. )uchwald, $rom axwell to icrophysics, University of !hicago .ress, !hicago and +ondon, 9:KC, p. EE.M )efore one falls for that "static" nonsense, one must understand what "static" really is. That*s expressed beautifully by /an $landern, as followsD "To retain causality, we must distinguish two distinct meanings

of the term *static*. 1ne meaning is unchanging in the sense of no moving parts. The other meaning is sameness from moment to moment by continual replacement of all moving parts. 7e can visuali,e this difference by thinking of a waterfall. ( fro,en waterfall is static in the first sense, and a flowing waterfall is static in the second sense. )oth are essentially the same at every moment, yet the latter has moving parts capable of transferring momentum, and is made of entities that propagate. LTom /an $landern, "The speed of gravity 5 7hat the experiments say," .hysics +etters (, /ol. BC<, =ec. B9, 9::K, p.K5:. M $rom the 7hittaker papers of 9:<; and 9:<E, we have known for just about a century that all static E fields and potentials are in fact "static" fields of /an $landern*s second kind 555 analogous to an unfro,en waterfall. There is a continuous bidirectional movement of an internal E structure of longitudinal waves inside 3and comprising4 all E fields and potentials. %o the "static envelope" of the field exists, but the "inside" components are in violent change and motion, in )1T' directions. (gain, that*s been known and in the literature since 9:<;. )ut that does not appear in the hoary old seriously flawed electrical engineering, which continues to try to consider the static potential and static field as a "fro,en waterfall" analogy. &either does the solution for the source of the input energy to the source charge, nor the form of that energy input, appear in the !E and EE models. The !E and EE models do not even model the vacuum flux exchange with the charge, much less a broken symmetry in that exchange. %o they do not even model what powers every electrical circuit. .eriod. &ever have. 0f one wishes to tangle with true negative resistance, then one should just try to answer 3in classical E only, such as electrical engineering4 the #uestion of from where and how a given charge gets the E energy that it continuously pours out, establishing its fields and potentials and their energy across the universe at the speed of light. 0f one cannot answer that #uestion in classical E and electrical engineering, one will then have to go read some physics, because it*s been answered for EC years in particle physics, and a &obel .ri,e was awarded to +ee and @ang in 9:CF for their having predicted the basis for that solution. )roken symmetry was such a tremendous revolution to all of physics that the &obel !ommittee moved with unprecedented speed in awarding that &obel .ri,e to +ee and @ang. They strongly predicted it in 9:CA5early 9:CF, and 7u and her colleagues proved it experimentally in early 9:CF. The &obel .ri,e was then awarded to +ee and @ang in that same year, in =ec. 9:CF 55 a nearly unprecedented action. 0t would be nice if the electrical engineering departments would walk

across the campus to the particle physics departments, and find out just what broken symmetry means for the source charge and the source dipole. /oila> %uddenly they would find out what actually powers every E circuit and system, and that the energy 555 all of it, every joule of it 55 comes from the seething vacuum via the asymmetry of the source charge or dipole. They haven*t seemed to be able to do that arduous little walk across the campus task in EC years now. (nd they have not changed their model to include the active vacuum and the broken symmetry in the vacuum exchange with the charge and the dipole. 0f one cannot solve the source charge problem and present that solution 3as !E and EE cannot do4, then one is guilty of implicitly assuming that every charge in the universe is a perpetual motion machine, freely creating energy from nothing. That is precisely the case for every electrical engineering department, professor, and textbook today, and it always has been. 0t is #uite humorous 55 and downright eerie 55 that the very fellows so critical of the overunity researchers as a "bunch of perpetual motion nuts" also implicitly assume, albeit unwittingly, that every charge in the universe is a perpetual motion machine, freely and continuously creating energy out of nothing. .oetic justice. $urther, the charge exhibits giant, continuously increasing negentropy, because the energy it continuously pours out at a steady and unwavering rate is not disordered but perfectly ordered. (t a given radial distance from the source charge, the associated field has a specific value and direction, the associated static potential has a specific value, and the associated vector potential has a specific value and direction, deterministically and perfectly ordered. 7ell, the very notion of entropy always had a serious flaw anyway. 0t pre5assumes that a negentropic operation at least e#ual to whatever the entropy is, must have first occurred. 1therwise there could have been no order in the first place, to %U)%EIUE&T+@ disorder. (nd the solution to the source charge problem provides the answer of where all that negentropy first comes from, to continuously produce the negentropy 3order4 that is later disordered in entropic processes. %o the mere existence of electrodynamics and its giant negentropy and increasing order of the fields and potentials being poured out of the source charges destroys any notion of absoluteness in the second law of thermodynamics 3the law of continual increase in disorder, or continuously increasing entropy4. 0t has long been recogni,ed that the second law 3which is based on statistical mechanics4 does not apply to the single ion, charged particle, atom, molecule, or group of molecules. (t the microscopic level, all

reactions are reversible because the e#uations are reversible. %o things can run backwards as well as forward at the microscopic level, which is a form of time5reversal. 0n a "running backwards" situation, if macroscopic, then an ordinary resistor would act as a true negative resistor 3and so it does, if you feed it negative energy which is time5reversed energy4. y new book, just coming off the presses, uses that fact to explain cold fusion, and we give the specific reaction e#uations producing the excess deuterium, tritium, and alpha particles 555 as well as explaining the strange and anomalous instrumental problems encountered for some years in rigorous electrolyte experiments at U.%. &aval research facilities at !hina +ake. )ut it has also long been accepted somewhat dogmatically that, well, the second law does still irrevocably apply to (!81%!1.0! phenomena and si,e. %ome things recently have happened to upset or "bother" even that standard answer. $irst, =enis Evans et al. of the &ational (ustralian University have rigorously proven that, contrary to previous assumptions, reactions can "run backwards" at up to micron 3colloidal4 scale, and for up to T71 %E!1&=%. &ow that*s within easy switching range for modern circuits and processes. %o all of a sudden it becomes important. The nanobots being widely developed just now in nanotechnology a close to molecular si,e will thus experience abrupt periods of "running backwards" and so they will not work at all in the same manner as their much larger robots. The reference on the Evans work is 6. . 7ang, E. . %evick, Emil ittag, =ebra 2. %earles, and =enis 2. Evans, "Experimental =emonstration of /iolations of the %econd +aw of Thermodynamics for %mall %ystems and %hort Time %cales," .hys. 8ev. +ett., K:3C4, B: 2uly B<<B, <C<A<9. ( good article to read on what it all means, is %teven -. )lau, "The Unusual Thermodynamics of icroscopic %ystems," .hysics Today, CC3:4, %ep. B<<B, p. 9:5B9. There are other comments on the Evans et al. work? you can take your choice based on the smugness and dogma used in the comments. The individual charged particle, being microscopic 3including even an ion in a solution4 comes under the reversible criterion and therefore is appreciably "immune" to the second law. %o one is not too disconcerted to find it "running backwards" and pouring out real energy, at last for a short time. 0n short, one is not surprised that it produces giant negentropy, $18 ( %'18T T0 E. 7hat is surprising 3and bewildering to classical E and to the classical thermodynamicists4 is that the charge produces negentropy !1&T0&U1U%+@, for any length of time. %o it produces continuously increasing &E6E&T81.@. There are other areas that are also known and recogni,ed to violate thermodynamics, including in the large macroscopic realm. %everal of these are listed on p. EC: of =ilip -ondepudi and 0lya .rigogine, odern ThermodynamicsD $rom 'eat Engines to =issipative %tructures, 7iley, 9::K, corrected printing in 9:::. Iuoting p. EC:D "%ome of these areas are 394

"... rarefied media, where the idea of local e#uilibrium fails. The average energy at each point depends on the temperature at the boundaries. 0mportant astrophysical situations belong to this category." 3B4 "...strong gradients, where we expect the failure of linear laws such as the $ourier law for heat conduction. &ot much is known either experimentally or theoretically. (ttempts to introduce such nonlinear outcomes ... have led to *extended thermodynamics* ." 3;4 "...memory effects which appear for long times 3as compared to characteristic relaxation times4. ...non5e#uilibrium processes may have *long time5tails*...". $orefront scientists are attempting to extend thermodynamics at present, to include 3hopefully4 some kind of explanation for these areas. )ut what is important is that the energy continuously poured out by every magnetic or electrical charge 3as a true negative resistor, extracting unusable energy from the vacuum and pouring it out in usable E form4 forms perfect order, perfectly correlated to that charge, to any macroscopic si,e one wishes. 2ust pick a si,e and wait long enough for the speed of light to reach that radial distance, and you will have a volume of that radius that has been filled with perfectly ordered E energy from that source charge. The original charges in original matter in the universe have been doing that for 9E billion years, and they are still going. (nd their perfectly ordered fields and potentials reach across the entire observable universe. %o every part of electrodynamics 555 the source charge, the field, the potential, and every joule of E energy in every E field and potential, whether in space or in matter 555 is in total violation of the second law of thermodynamics, and T1 (&@ (!81%!1.0! %0JE +E/E+ 1&E 70%'E%, 0&!+U=0&6 (!81%% T'E E&T08E U&0/E8%E when one accounts the perfect and continually increasing order of the fields and potentials and their energy. %o there you have your true negative resistor 3not to be confused with the silly tunnel diode, which "puts some energy back to the circuit power source in reverse against the voltage" while eating lots more energy from the power source as work performed to allow it to be done4 in every charge in the universe. (nd all E energy 55 in every field, potential, and circuit and system 555 comes directly from the vacuum, via the broken symmetry of the source charge. =on*t underrate the importance of the source charge problem. Either one has to have a solution to that problem, or else one must surrender the conservation of energy law in its entirety, since it is totally falsified by every charge in the universe unless the source charge solution from particle physics is included in one*s model. $or the EE model and !E , that would re#uire drastic surgery and extension of the models. (ctually, much better systems of electrodynamics are already created and available in particle physics.

(s we said, classical electrodynamics and electrical engineering do not include the active vacuum in their model, nor therefore the broken symmetry in the exchange between the active vacuum and every charge and dipole in the circuit. %ince those models do not include the actual source of any or all the E energy in a circuit or system, then those models do not include what powers an electrical circuit or system 3some of that very energy that is extracted from the vacuum via the source charge*s broken symmetry4. That was all excusable until 9:CF. Today it is inexcusable, once one points out the solution sitting there in particle physics. (nd if you really wish to get at this matter of energy flow really well, then read the original papers of 'eaviside and .oynting, who independently and simultaneously in the 9KK<s discovered the propagation of E energy in space, after axwell was already dead. )efore that, the concept did not even appear in physics. The primary energy flow connected with a circuit actually flows outside the conductors, in the external space. ( tiny bit of it 3the .oynting component4 is diverged into the circuit conductors to power the electrons. The huge remainder 3the 'eaviside nondiverged energy flow component, which is in circulation form4 is not diverged into the circuit at all, but is just wasted and ignored. +orent, in the 9K:<s stated that, well, it has no physical significance 3because it does not do anything4, so he originated a clever little integration trick to get rid of all accountability of it. The abandoned and unaccounted 'eaviside component may have a magnitude up to a trillion times or more, of the magnitude of the .oynting component. 0 am working on a paper that points out some very startling and completely unexpected things that are indeed "done" by that long neglected 'eaviside component. 0t plays a major role in the appearance of the various ice ages upon the Earth, and creates the excess gravity that is holding the arms of the spiral galaxies intact 3'eaviside himself recogni,ed the gravitational implications of his extra component, and dealt with it in his notes, but did not live to publish it. The notes were found in 9:CF 3curious coincidence>4 and published by one of the learned societies. 0f applied properly, the 'eaviside component also plays the major role in producing the mysterious antigravity that is accelerating the expansion of the universe? 0 explain that in my forthcoming book, just now coming off the presses. The )ohren5type experiment 3with the so5called "negative resonance absorption of the medium"4 is also an experiment routinely done by nonlinear optical departments. 0t outputs 9K or so times as much energy as one inputs. There are some other important contributions of the 'eaviside component that 0 will include in the paper, which will re#uire another two or three months to finish.'owever, my main point is thisD 7hen the long5unaccounted 555 (8)0T8(80+@ excluded> 555 'eaviside energy flow component is re5accounted, then every generator and battery and dipolar power source in the universe already pours out enormously more E energy than the mechanical shaft energy input to the generator, the chemical energy dissipated in the battery, and so on. (ll

of them always have. 1ne can experimentally demonstrate the existence of that long5neglected component, by a )ohren5type experiment. %ee !raig $. )ohren,"'ow can a particle absorb more than the light incident on it"" (merican 2ournal of .hysics, C93E4, (pr. 9:K;, p. ;B;5;BF. Under nonlinear conditions, a particle can absorb more energy than is in the light incident on it. etallic particles at ultraviolet fre#uencies are one class of such particles and insulating particles at infrared fre#uencies are another. %ee also '. .aul and 8. $ischer, T!omment on "'ow can a particle absorb more than the light incident on it"*U," (m. 2. .hys., C93E4, (pr. 9:K;, p. ;BF. The )ohren experiment is repeatable and produces !1. S 9K. (nyway, you have true negative resistors everywhere you turnD in every charge in the universe, and every power source also if you re5account for the long5neglected 'eaviside nondiverged energy flow component associated with every fieldGcharge and potentialGcharge interaction. Tom )earden

LS 0atentM548=4N, Dohn Be%ini an% Thomas Bear%en 3ave $een working on these systems now for over 4, years! /ne is %riving his car an% keeps crossing the same river over an% over! Then the light $ l$ in yo r hea% goes on# he $egins to think what %oes this meanO ItEs CNat res /pen SystemC! The very next thing to %o is to stick a pa%%lewheel into the river# this is where we stop for we have ; st create% a open system to the pa%%lewheel# everything from the shaft to the generator to yo r loa% is now in a close% path# $ t the river is C"REEC an% C/0ENC What Electrical Engineers %o is take the o tp t of the river an% $ring it $ack to the inp t of the river an% then p mp the hell o t of the pa%%lewheel to keep the river moving! CThis is calle% closing the loopC! With this type of system yo can NEKER PET A Q./0 of + or BETTERG! The so rce is C Nat res /pen SystemC !CAo walk aro n% in this system every %ay an% fail to see how it worksC! What %oes this mean for electrical circ its# It 6eans yo can never collect anything that yo %o not pay for# for yo are forever p mping that river! The Lniverse is a open system# a contin ally r nning river! All yo m st %o is fin% where to p t the pa%%lewheel an% not close the loop! Dohn Be%ini

-ron, 6abriel. V8ow a !alue * of the negati!e resistances, at which the generator current becomes zero, re"resents a state at which the circuit is self#su""orting and has a continuous e1istence of its own without the "resence of the generator, as the negati!e resistances .ust su""ly the energy consumed by the "ositi!e resistances. ,If the circuit contains inductors and ca"acitors, the circuit is a resonant circuit and it oscillates at its basic fre9uency.- : )hen the generator current is "ositi!e the circuit draws energy from the source, and when the current is negati!e the circuit "um"s back energy into the source. ;t zero generator current the circuit neither gi!es nor takes energy, and theoretically the generator may be remo!ed.W 6abriel -ron, VElectric circuit models of the %chrXdinger e#uation,W .hys. 8ev. AF395B4, 2an. 9 and 9C, 9:EC, p. E9. -ron, 6abriel. (...the missing conce"t of (o"en#"aths( ,the dual of (closed#"aths(- was disco!ered, in which currents could be made to flow in branches that lie between any set of two nodes. ,<re!iously = following +a1well = engineers tied all of their o"en# "aths to a single datum#"oint, the >ground>-. hat disco!ery of o"en#"aths established a second rectangular transformation matri1... which created >lamellar> currents...( (; network with the simultaneous "resence of both closed and o"en "aths was the answer to the author>s years#long search.( 6abriel -ron, "The $rustrating %earch for a 6eometrical odel of Electrodynamic &etworks," 2ournal unk., issue unk., circa 9:AB, p. 99959BK. The #uote is from p. 99E. -ron, 6abriel. . ()hen only "ositi!e and negati!e real numbers e1ist, it is customary to re"lace a "ositi!e resistance by an inductance and a negati!e resistance by a ca"acitor ,since none or only a few negati!e resistances e1ist on "ractical network analyzers.-( 6abriel -ron, "&umerical solution of ordinary and partial differential e#uations by means of e#uivalent circuits." 2ournal of (pplied .hysics, /ol. 9A, ar. 9:ECa, p. 9F;. %o this is what -ron is sayingD )hen the generator current becomes zero the circuit is self#su""orting as the negati!e resistances .ust su""ly the energy consumed by the "ositi!e resistances. )hen the generator current is "ositi!e the circuit draws energy from the source, and when the current is negati!e the circuit "um"s back energy into the source this is known as? o"en#"aths? and @closed#"aths?. hat disco!ery of o"en#"aths established a second rectangular transformation matri1... which created >lamellar> currents. his circuit uses "ositi!e resistance by an inductance and a negati!e resistance by a ca"acitor. %o here is the proof that what -ron is saying is true and the light runs itself without any power from the primary source

0 must stop right here and say, Thomas )earden and 0 have been friends for B< years during this time we have been the best of friends through thick and thin, and 0 always will be Tom*s friend forever.@ou only in your life time have two or three friends that you can trust with your life and Thomas )earden is the one. 0 enjoyed building everything on the bench that had to do with Tom*s theories, and with a little work "T'E@ 718-". )ut you must learn how to think out side the box. (s to this day Tom and 0 always keep discussing this field, and it will never end.

The @ear was 9:K;," %o you do not know your history" This was 9: years ago Thomas )earden 9:K; Toward a new electromagetics .art ED

Dn this slide& we show a theoretical scheme which several researchers have discovered and used to build simple free energy motors. <n this scheme& we drive an ordinary d.c. series motor by a two wire system from an ordinary battery. The motor produces shaft horsepower& at Y say Y some 3# or 4# percent efficiency& compared to the power drained from the battery. This much of the circuit is perfectly ordinary. The tric- here is to get the battery to recharge itself& without furnishing normal power to it& or e8pending wor- from the e8ternal circuit in the process.9This is the paddlewheel in the river: To do this& recall that a charged particle in the ]hoo-ing^ del0phi river moves itself.. This is true for an ion& as well as for an electron. ?e need only ma-e the del0phi in correct fashion and synchroni;e itN specifically& we must not release the hose no;;les we utili;e to produce our del0 phi river or waves.9The Mharge moves itself: The inventors who have discovered this have used various variations& but here we show a common one. (irst& we add an ]energi;er^ 9often referred to by various other names: to the circuit. This device ma-es the del0phi waves we will utili;e& but does ,DT ma-e currents of electron masses. <n other words& it ma-es pure #0dot. <t ta-es a little wor- to do this& for the energi;er circuit must pump a few charges now and then. )o the energi;er draws a little bit of power from the motor& but not very much.9The +nergi;er is a unit that does not develope current& only potential charge& and no drag on the FM motor.: ,ow we add a switching device& called a controller& which brea-s up power to the motor in pulses. Furing one pulse& the battery is connected and furnishes power to the motorN during the

succeeding pulse& the battery is disconnected completely from the motor and the output from the energi;er is applied across the terminals of the battery. 9This device is any update motor speed controller 3?*: <f fre1uency content& spin0hole content& etc. are properly constructed by the energi;er& then the ion movements in the battery reverse themselves& recharging the battery. 2gain remember that these ions *D4+ T>+*)+74+) during this recharge phase. )pecifically& we are ,DT furnishing ordinary current to the battery& and we are not doing wor- on it from the energi;er.9<t is the proper timeing and switching after this: <f things are built properly& the battery can be made to more than recover its charge during this pulse cycle. To prevent e8cess charge of the battery and overheating and destroying it& a sensor is added which senses the state of charge of the battery& and furnishes a feedbac- signal to the controller to regulate the length of recharge time per ]power off^ pulse. <n other words& the system is not self0regulating. The relation between power pulses and recharge pulses is shown on the graphs at the bottom. ,ote that regulation may decrease the time of recharge application of the del0phi river. This system& if properly built and tuned& will furnish ]free shaft energy^ continually& without violating conservation of anenergy. Iemember that the del0phi condition across the battery terminals means that space0time is suddenly curved there& and conservation of energy need no longer apply. 2gain& this system is consistent with general relativity and with the fact that #0field alone can drive a situation relativistic. ?e have deliberately used these facts to do direct engineering. Dur ]e8tra energy^ comes from shifting phi0flu8 Y the energy of the universal vacuum space0time Y directly into ordinary energy for our use. Thus we draw on an ine8haustible source& and our device is no more esoteric than a paddlewheel in a river. Then only difference is that& in this case& we have to be clever enough to ma-e and divert the river in the right timing se1uency. 9 The' Dpen and Mlosed 3aths'& ron: 9c: Hy Thomas + Hearden !"%3 )o what Thomas Hearden is saying& which applies to 9 ron:& <s that the *otor is a variable inductor& and is in the 'M7D)+F 32T> ' this is all normal +*. >owever when the motor is disconnected from the battery this then becomes a "1.E& .(T' " To the Energi,er which isElectrostatic in .otential and no agnetic flux cutting is needed. (nother words the energi,erapplies no load to the otor This system is justbackwards to" -ron*s" statement but does the same thing. &1TED The electrostatic energi,er must pump a few electrons during this process, but very little. 3 0t*s called lamellar> currents4

T>+ J+2I <) !"%4

2fter loo-ing at what Tom Hearden did in the boo- +lectromagnetics part 4& This is what < did in !"%4 to ma-e the first model /. < -new that it must be a switching and impedance problem& < also -new allot about pulse charging systems and what they did to the lead acid storage batteries . < also -new about charging batteries with huge Mapacitor Han-s. < was good at this

because of the 2mplifiers we were building at the time. Jou run into all -inds of <mpedance problems and 3hasing& so this was a piece of ca-e. < also -new about *ass weight and what flywheels did and how they stored energy. < figured that the generator could not be the normal -ind because they were saying the word +,+IG<S+I which really means *2G,+TD& but this did not answer the 1uestion of where the current came from& the Mapacitor was the answer. The *2G,+TD would charge this very fast and to >igh 4oltages some times !# times the battery voltage. ?hen the machine first ran it would e8plode the batteries if they were bad& so < put the switch )! to control it. ?hen the battery would get low < would switch )! to charge the battery bac- up. This was !% years ago with what we have today this machine can be made real easy if you tin-er with it and get it set right. The +,+IG<S+I >ow did < come up with this one you see in the picture. *y uncle was a old time mechanic who was a real tin-er& he use to tell me of the old lighting circuits just after the horse and carriage days and things that people would never believe& this is where *y *2G,+TD comes from. < told .im ?atson how to do this& < never thought that he would build a *achine that big but >e did. and that's the story of this machine. .im got paid off < got pushed agents the wall and told to by gasoline the rest of *y life but once you see something li-e this you never give up.

<n !"%4 we could not just go down the street and by switching controllers& we just had to ma-e are own from whatever parts we could find there were no *oss (ets no <HGT's just H<03olar Transistors and some very good ones& but the easiest to do was a switched commutator as shown in the drawing which developed the most power with out loss. This machine wor-ed the same way described in Gabriel rons statements tal-ing about the 'D3+, and M7D)+F paths.

This brings us to ron's analogy said a different way.

)hen the Aenerator ,+;A8* B- current becomes zero the circuit is self#su""orting as the negati!e resistance of the circuit .ust su""ly the energy consumed by the "ositi!e resistance in the !apacitor. )hen the +otor current is "ositi!e the circuit draws energy from the $attery, and when the current is negati!e the Ca"acitor circuit "um"s back

energy into the source ,$attery- this is known as? o"en#"aths? and @closed#"aths?. hat disco!ery of o"en#"aths established a second rectangular transformation matri1... into the Ca"acitor which created >lamellar> currents. his circuit uses "ositi!e resistance in the +otor by an inductance and a negati!e resistance by a Ca"acitor bank collecting charge from the +agneto. ?hat is it that <'m really saying=. <'m saying once the machine starts and is pulsed buy the controller& or commutator there is a switching ta-ing place between the motor and the magneto using a capacitor that is being charged by the magneto in the D3+, path& while the motor is drawing a momentary current in a M7D)+F path the two do not interfere with each other. )o the magneto is something )T2T<M li-e a lighting bolt& just a M>2IG+ no real current. This is where the TI2,)(DI*2T<D, ta-es place from )T2T<M to real useable current for discharge across the battery. The switching ta-es place and the capacitor discharges across the storage battery& but only to the level of the storage battery& so the level of the *2G,+TD must be 5 times the battery voltage & the capacitor is now at the level of the storage battery and the process starts all over. ,ow you have ID,') open and closed path system with no interacting grounds. <f the battery is in good shape the impedance is around .##/3 Dhms. <f this is done fast enough and correct you will get a constant high current flowing to the battery& what the motor is using for power is not worth tal-ing about. The system here can be done many ways this is just one.

T,. Testing 4a#s

B0TTER5 TE+T F2R T)E BE&1/1 M2T2R GE/ER0T2R
+&17 : ,C1,>7G 13, 2000 >&117G= 17?1 ?7LU7'C7: ,ne lead acid gel6cell 212 volts, 0C0 milliamps5 is being tili8ed as the primar$ so rce f ll$ charged at 12#C volts# 1hree 235 lead acid gel6cell batteries 212 volt, 0C0 milliamps5 strapped in parallel are being sed as the charge destination# 1he batteries are discharged to 10 volts for the test p rposes# 1est E1 starts at 10:0C &- tili8ing primar$ batter$ f ll$ charged at 12#C volts charging three 235 destination batteries paralleled# 1he destination batteries reach a charge capacit$ of 10 volts at 11:20 &-#

The destination #atteries are then discharged to 17 "olts under wor*ing load to re are %or Test F6. Test F6 starts at 11G6H 0M utili:ing rimar! #atter! measured at 11.H "olts. Charging three C<D destination #atteries aralleled. The destination #atteries reach a charge ca acit! o% 1; "olts at 16GH7 -M. The destination #atteries are then discharged to 17 "olts under wor*ing load to re are %or Test F<. Test R3 starts at !A## 3* utili;ing primary battery measured at !#.5 volts. Mharging three 93: destination batteries paralleled. The destination batteries reach a charge capacity of !4 volts at !A4# 3*. The destination #atteries are then discharged to 17 "olts under wor*ing load to re are %or Test F;. Test F; starts at 6G7H -M utili:ing rimar! #atter! measured at E.H "olts. Charging three C<D destination #atteries aralleled. The destination #atteries reach a charge ca acit! o% 1< "olts at 6G;7 -M. The rimar! #atter! is now discharged to E "olts under wor*ing load and una#le to %urther run the Bedini motor generator. T2T04 B0TTER1E+ C)0RGE&G !/ lead acid gel0cell batteries 9!/ volts& 45# milliamps each:. This ratio is a !/ to ! charging factor. The motor operation 9wor-: being performed as this was done is not included as an additional factor in this test.

The !ear is 1EEE now and, ,+ -atents are %iled on Re-Gauging

and -otential Charging 2% +torage Batteries.

The chart above is the TQ4 test of the >ighly *odified )chool Girl *otor dual battery system using standard Iadio )hac- Hatteries off the shelf& never charging the batteries out of their pac-ages. ?hat was the purpose of the *onopole *otor posted on eely,et& in answer to that 1uestion it was to e8plain the technology of the 3otential Mharging of lead acid batteries and how this is done with a Hac- +*(& or +lectrostatic energy. 2s simple as the )chool Girl *otor was it opened a gateway into the understanding of how to transform many of these electromagnetic pulses into real useable power for lead acid batteries& and many other type cells. <n !"%% .ohn Hedini set out to loo- at all the designs over the past years only to discover that the motor was the problem& the normal off the shelf motors were just not efficient enough. <t was understood that in a system that must go over unity or a MD3 of ! the motor being in a closed loop in the front end must be ""W or better.

,DT+A we never used the shaft power for anything e8cept to turn a fan& or control timing. 9HT<: .ohn started to developed motors running in this range& these were -nown to just transform the power into a potential charge without using any primary current& using just simple switching to do this. .ohn then built about !46 different designs of this motor. 2t each design& .ohn would call meetings with the investors and e8plain the system and how it wor-ed& >e then would summit to a testing of that system with out side consultants and reproduction of the system after the proper forms were singed. .ohn post to eely,et a simple drawing allowing anybody to ma-e the design after 3atents were filed with the Q) 3atent office. .ohn has always said that others need to -now what the Technology is and how it wor-s in the end. ?hat .ohn did not -now was that others could not build it li-e .ohn and did not understand the meaning of the e8perimental device. ?hat was the meaning of the devices= The device was nothing more then a simple pulse motor with a Dne to Dne Transformer to collect 3otential Mharge in a Mapacitor Han- without using any primary current to do it& to a voltage level for discharge across the secondary battery. ?hat did the

device teach us& <t taught use a lot about what happens in lead acid batteries and how the lead acid battery could become the fuel cell of the future through just holding a 3otential charge on the battery in pulses while the motor is out of the closed current loop. ?hat .ohn did with his e8perimental wor- was to show us at HT<& that you only need a '+lectrostatic 3otential' to charge the battery and the battery would recharge itself& and would sustain that charge in time longer then the normal charging of batteries. ,DT+A <n Ieviewing lab notes& .ohn started his wor- on these systems in the !"$#'s while in the Q) 2rmy& 2 1uote from one of his friends *a8& .ohn always wanted to hoo- up a *otor to a Generator and have it run itself. Gary Hedini HT<

This now #rings us to the current motor rocess de"elo ed #! BT1, ,+ -atent F ?<E6<(7 what was the machine and how did it wor*. The de"ice in this atent was much di%%erent in it$s design in that it was a %ull #i- olar re-gauging motor energi:er #ac* EMF electrostatic all in one. the ermanent magnet located #etween the two #ars is used to attract the rotor in when the rotor mo"es into osition this motor is at the neutral line or %ree %loating. The trigger circuit now %ires one ulse %orcing the rotor out %rom the neutral oint, %orcing also the magnetic %ield o% the ermanent magnet to switch oles when this rocess ta*es lace the #ac* EMF, or electrostatic discharge, charges the ca acitors with it$s otential charge #ut the rimar! circuit is out o% the loo . The motor disc is 16 inches in diameter and has 17 magnets e"enl! di"ided around the disc all oles #eing li*e %rom side to side. the ower in ut is T=2 =0TT+ %rom one 16"olt rimar! #atter!. The out ut side uses ; dee c!cle #atteries all connected together and recei"es discharge ulses e"er! two seconds %rom the ca acitor #an* this rocess ta*es lace 6; hours a da! %or howe"er man! da!s the machine is running, at an! time the rimar! #atter! ma! #e re laced with one %rom the out ut side,or switched to recharge itsel% %rom the secondar! #atteries. This *ee s all the loo s se arate. No4 1et51ning to L1on's 4o1: 4he1e he is tal:ing abo5t a negati3e 1esisto17 an6 potential cha1ge o0 high 3oltage 4ill 0o1ce the dipole apa1t in a sto1age batte167 o1 in an6 ci1c5it co11ectl6 done to s5ppl6 the ene1g6 to po4e1 itsel0 ( What does this mean 0o1 the sto1age batte167 it means the lead ions can not mo3e into a cha1ge state o1 a discha1ge state7 b5t the potential o0 the batte16 is the1e to be 5sed and the 5ni3e1sal dipole is s5ppl6ing the ene1g6

to the ci1c5it in a open s6stem( one onl6 needs to c1eate onl6 delBphi ,%otential- 4a3es and not c511ents o0 elect1on masses(

BE&1/1$+ FREE E/ERG5 GE/ER0T2R

Bedini$s demonstration was %ollowed #! 3im =atson, a research scientist li"ing in Colorado + rings.=atson resented two wor*ing de"ices similar to 3ohn Bedini$s. The smaller de"ice was running during =atson$s entire resentation and the audience could "eri%! that the #atter! was #eing recharged constantl!. The larger de"ice, which weighed '77 ounds, was demonstrated onl! %or 17 minutes due to ractical reasons. &uring this time a constant load o% 16*w could #e withdrawn %rom the de"ice. The de"ice itsel% was owered #! two 16" car #atteries. +EEG E/ERG5 M0C)1/E -1CT,RE+

F2RE=2R&
1magine ha"ing a small &.C. electrical motor sitting on !our la#orator! #ench owered #! a common 16 "olt #atter!. 1magine starting with a %ull! charged #atter! and connecting it to the motor with no other ower in ut. 2#"iousl!, the motor is going to run o%% the #atter!, #ut #! con"entional thin*ing it will sto when the #atter! runs down. 1m ossi#le, !ou sa!. /ot at all. That$s recisel! what 1 ha"e done and the motor is running now in m! wor*sho . 1t isn$t running #! the con"entional wisdom o% electrical h!sics. 1t isn$t running #! the con"entional rules o% electric motors and generators, #ut it is running.

1t isn$t something com le>. 1t is hang o% the #asic idea.

rett! sim le, once one gets the

1t is running o%% the rinci les o% electromagnetics that /i*ola Tesla disco"ered shortl! #e%ore 1E77 in his Colorado + rings e> eriments. 1t is running o%% the %act that em t! "acuum - ure @em tiness@, so to s ea* - is %illed with ri"ers and oceans o% seething energ!, just as /i*ola Tesla ointed out. 1t is running o%% the %act that "acuum s ace-time itsel% is nothing #ut ure massless charge. That is, "cuum has a "er! high electrostatic scalar otential - it is greatl! stressed. To use%ull! ta the enormous loc*ed-in energ! o% that stress, all one has to do is crac* it shar l! and ta the "acuum oscillations that result. The #est wa! to do that is to hit something resonant that is im#edded in the "acuum, then ta the resonant stress o% the ringing o% the "acuum itsel% 1n other words, we can ring something at its resonant %reAuenc! and, i% that something is im#edded in the "acuum, we can ta o%% the resonance in "acuum stress, without ta ing energ! directl! %rom the em#edded s!stem we rang into oscillation, +o what we reall! need is something that is dee l! im#edded in the "acuum, that is, something that can translate @"acuum@ mo"ement to @mass@ mo"ement. =ell, all charged articles and ions are alread! im#edded in the "acuum #! their charged %lu>es, so stressed oscillations - that is, "acuum oscillations - can #e con"erted into normal energ! o% mass mo"ement #! charged articles or ions, i% the s!stem o% charged articles or ions is made to resonate in hase with our ta ing @ otential@. For our ur ose, let$s use a s!stem o% ions. First we will need a #ig accumulator to hold a lot o% the charged ions in the s!stem that we wish to shoc* into oscillation. =e need something that has a #ig ca acitance and also contains a lot o% ions. 0n ordinar! #atter! %illed with electrol!te %its the #ill nicel!. =hile it is not commonl! *nown, ordinar! lead-acid storage #atteries ha"e a resonant ionic %reAuenc!, usuall! in the range o% %rom 1-? M):. 0ll we ha"e to do is shoc*-oscillate the ions in the electrol!te at their resonant %reAuenc! and time our @trigger@ otential and @si hon@ current correctl!. Then i% we *ee adding otential to trigger the s!stem we can get all that @ otential@ to translate into @%ree electrical energ!@. 4oo* at it this wa!. Con"entionall! @electrostatic scalar otential@ is com osed o% wor* or energ! er column o% charged article mass. +o i% we add otential alone, without the mass %low, to a s!stem o% oscillating charged articles, we add @ h!sical energ!@ in the entire charged article s!stem. 1n other words, the @ otential@ we add is

con"erted directl! into @ordinar! energ!@ #! the im#edded ions in the s!stem. 1% we are cle"er we don$t ha"e to %urnish an! ushing energ! to mo"e ure otential around. CFor roo% that this is ossi#le, see Bearden$s "Toward a New Electromagnetics; Part IV; Vectors and Mechanisms Clarified", Tesla Boo* Co,, 1E'<, +lide 1E, age ;<, and the accom an!ing write-u , ages 17,11. 0lso see 5. 0harono" and .. Bohm, @+igni%icance o% Electromagnetic -otentials in the Nuantum Theor!@, "Physical Review", +econd +eries, .ol. 11H, /o. <, 0ug 1, 1EHE, ages ;'H-;E1. 2n age ;E7 !ou will %ind that it$s ossi#le to ha"e a %ield-%ree region o% s ace, and still ha"e the otential determine the h!sical ro erties o% the s!stem.D /ow this @%ree energ! resonant cou ling@ can #e done in a sim le, chea s!stem. 5ou don$t need #ig c!clotrons and huge la#oratories to do itO !ou can do it with ordinar! &.C. motors, #atteries, controllers and trigger circuits. 0nd that$s e>actl! what 1 ha"e done. 1t$s real. 1t wor*s. 1t is running now on m! la#orator! #ench in rotot! e %orm. But that$s not all. 1 am also a humanitarian. 1 am concerned %or that little old widow lad! at the end o% the lane, stretching her meager +ocial +ecurit! chec* as %ar as she can, shi"ering in the cold winter and not daring to turn u her %urnace #ecause she can$t a%%ord the %right%ul utilit! #ills. That$s sim l! got to change and 1 ma! well #e the %ellow who changes it. B! o enl! releasing m! wor* in this a er, 1 am ro"iding enough in%ormation %or all the tin*erers and inde endent in"entors around the world to ha"e at it. 1% 1 can get a thousand o% them to du licate m! de"ice, it sim l! can$t #e su ressed as so man! others ha"e #een. +o here it is. 1 ha"e deli#eratel! written m! a er %or the tin*erer and e> erimenter, not %or the scientist. 5ou must #e care%ul, %or the de"ice is a little tric*! to adjust in and s!nchroni:e all the resonances. 5ou$ll ha"e to %iddle with it, #ut it will wor*. 9ee at it. 0lso, we warn !ou not to la! with this unless !ou *now what !ou are doing. The resonating #atter! electrol!te roduces h!drogen, and i% !ou hit it too hard with a @"oltage s i*e@ !ou can get an electrical s ar* inside the #atter!. 1% that ha ens, the #atter! will e> lode, so don$t mess with it unless !ou are Auali%ied and use the utmost caution. But it does wor*. +o all !ou e> erimenters and ioneers, now$s !our chance. )a"e at it. Build it. Tin*er with it. Fiddle it into resonant o eration. Then let$s #uild this thing in Auantit!, sell it widel!, and get those home utilities down to where we can all a%%ord them including the shi"ering little old lad! at the end o% the lane.

0nd when we do, let$s gi"e men li*e me the credit and a the! so richl! deser"e. The 1nstitute 2% Electrical 0nd Electronics Engineers, 1nc

reciation

3ohn C Bedini has constructed a la#orator! model o% a machine in which out ut energ! e>ceeds in ut. 1t consists o% a lead-acid #atter! which owers a small &C motor, which turns a magneto-li*e d!namo, which ro"ides out ut energ! to an electronics ac*age, which in turn %eeds timed CscalarPD ulses #ac* to the #atter! terminals %or recharging. 0s a demonstration, Bedini then remo"es the good #atter! and seAuentiall! inserts %ull! discharged, dead #atteries. Each o% the dead #atteries e"entuall! recei"es a %ull charge. +tated di%%erentl!, )e starts with one good #atter! and %our discharged #atteries. 0t the end o% the demonstration all %i"e #atteries are %ull! charged. This author has ersonall! "isited Bedini$s la# man! times , in com an! with technicians and ro%essors o% -h!sics and Electrical Engineering. /one o% us has #een a#le to %ault Bedini$s %indings. Each o% m! ro%essorial %riends, howe"er, has reAuested that their names not #e used %or attri#ution, the in%erence #eing that their res ecti"e uni"ersities would not #e understanding o% heretical conce ts.

EQ-ER1ME/T+ =1T) 0 9R2MRE5 0/& 0 BR0/&T-TE+40 C2/.ERTER B,14T B5 32)/ BE&1/1

F2RE=2R&
Following an in"itation #! 3ohn Bedini, 1 went with him to 4os 0ngeles immediatel! a%ter the Colorado + rings Tesla +!m osium on 0ugust 17 1E';. =e had two da!s together to wor* on the 9romre! Con"erter and the Tesla +witching &e"ice. 2ne thing came out "er! clearle!G e"er! time when we loc*ed into the @%ree energ!@ all commonl! *nown h!sical laws are no longer "alid. The things ha ening react directl! o osite to what one would e> ect. + eci%icall! the more we loaded a s eci%ic circuit, the more out ut energ! we gained, while using a constant in ut energ!

le"el. 1 will come #ac* to this e%%ect later, when 1 descri#e the e> eriments in more details. 0t this oint 1 want to ta*e the o ortunit! and than* 3ohn Bedini and his wi%e %or their hos italit! and assistance.1t ta*es ersons li*e 3ohn Bedini to get the @%ree energ!@ rolling. =ithout his u#lication K1L o% the detailed lans %or his %ree energ! de"ice, we would de%initel! not ha"e seen the %ree energ! de"ices demonstrated during the Tesla +!m osium. 0lso man! than*s to Tom Bearden, who too* his time and e> lained the results o% the test er%ormed on 0ugust 1< 1E';. )is comments are contained in the concluding cha ter o% this re ort. G0(<+7F R !

This was the model G-Field Bedini Electronics

roduced in the '7$s.

G-F1E4& B,14T B5 R2/ C24E

-R2T2T5-E G-F1E4& B,14T B5 C24E =1T) =0.EF2RM+ 2/ +C2-E ,/&ER 420&

M2T2R &10GR0M+ 0/& 40B /2TE+

Motor &iagrams 0nd 4a# /otes
The la# notes and diagrams on this age were #uilt #! 3ohn Bedini and Ron Cole. The theor! is all Tom Bearden$s, and comes out o% the #oo* @T2=0R& 0 /E= E4ECTR2M0G/ET1C+ -0RT ;G .ECT2R+ 0/& MEC)0/1+M+ C40R1F1E&@ The circuit diagrams that are in this section are %or eo le with electronic #ac*grounds. +ome o% the arts are outdated and will need to #e re laced.@-4E0+E &2 /2T C)0/GE T)1/G+ ,/T14 T)E5 =2R9@

T)E TE+40 +=1TC)

=e used as a starting oint %or our e> eriments, the switching de"ice 3ohn Bedini had #uilt %or the Tesla +!m osium. 2ur goal was to u grade this switching de"ice %or ordinar! car or motorc!cle #atteries. Because we had alread! learned that the e%%icienc! will go u the more we load the circuit, we decided to load this Tesla circuit also. =e %ound that when we connected a second lam , the %irst lam instantaneousl! #ecame #righter. Each time we disconnected and connected one o% the light #ul#s or other loads in the circuit, we saw a s ar* a#out a hal% inch long. The light o% this s ar* was noticea#l! di%%erent %rom the light o% s ar*s o#ser"ed when e> erimenting with high "oltages. =e disco"ered that in addition to Q-ra!s we were also generating scalar wa"es. These were detecting using a scalar wa"e detector #uilt #! 3ohn Bedini, which was #ased on a lan %urnished #! Tom Bearden.

T)E C1G0R-B2Q +1BE TE+40 +=1TC)

Bedini was then in"ited to s ea* at the Tesla Centennial +!m osium in Colorado + rings, C2, on 0ugust, 11, 1E';, The s!m osium honored the 177th anni"ersar! o% the arri"al o% /i*ola Tesla in the ,+0, and was s onsored #! the Tesla Committee, #! the 1nstitute %or Electronic and Electrical Engineers C1EEED, -i*es -ea* +ection, and #! the Ford 0eros aceR Communications Cor oration,Colorado + rings 2 eration. 0t the s!m osium, Bedini demonstrated an ine> ensi"e, cigar-#o> si:ed Tesla-t! e con"erter witch he had recentl! #uilt. Throughout the demonstration, which lasted a %ull 6; hours during the s!m osium, a constant load was #eing drawn out o% the s!stem to do wor*, /e"ertheless, the con"erter *e t the nic*el-cadmium #atteries %ull! chargedS The conce t, witch had #een originated #! /i*ola Tesla, was gi"en to 3ohn Bedini #! Ronald Brandt, who was a ersonal %riend o% /i*ola Tesla. Brandt is re uted to ha"e a similar con"erter which he has used %or !ears without loosing the #atter! charge. Bedini resented the schematic diagram showing how to #uild the solid-state de"ice, and then released co ies o% the schematic diagram.

This &iagram =as used #! 3ohn Bedini to test the Tesla +witch

The scalar wa"e #atter! charger.

1t ha ened on a +aturda! night on the Bill 3en*ins +how. 1 was in"ited to s ea* #etween the &odger Base#all game and the news. The show had a#out one hour remaining to the end at 16G77 midnight. Bill 3en*ins *new nothing a#out what 1 was going to tal* a#out that night. The time came %or us to go on the air and the rogram started. 1 then roceeded to tal* to the audience and 1 said, @&id

an!one e"er tr! this e> erimentG &id !ou e"er tr! charging two ca acitors, sa! a#out 66,777 micro%arads, with 16 "olts and then utting the two ca acitors in series and dum ing the charge across that same #atter!P@ 1n the ne>t %ew minutes the hone lines started to light u so 1 too* the %irst hone call and answered the erson$s Auestion. B! the time the ne>t call came u , it was time %or news. B! the time the news was o"er, 1 was on m! wa! home with Bill. =ell two wee*s went #! and it came time %or the ne>t radio show. This is where Ra! and Bill showed u . Bill 3en*ins called %or the radio station Chie% Engineer, and said to Ra! and BillG @=ell +how ,s what 5ou Got.@ Bill said, @=E )0.E 0 +C040R =0.E B0TTER5 C)0RGER.@ The Engineer said, @+ure !ou do.@ Bill said, @=e do. =e #uilt this to 3ohn Bedini$s lan.@ The Engineer said @29, 4ET$+ TE+T 1T.@ 0#out this time Bill threw the switch on the side o% the #o> , the lights and the motor started to run and Bill said to the station Engineer, @G2 0)E0& ME0+,RE T)E B0TTER5.@ The station Engineer ut the #est meter the station owned across the #atter!. The Engineer loo*ed o"er to Bill 3en*ins and Me and said, @1 do not #elie"e this. This #atter! %or all ractical ur oses is dead #ut !et it$s running the lights and the motor and the #atter! is not running down.@ For wee*s a%ter that the station was %looded with calls %rom eo le tr!ing to %ind out where the! could %ind this Bill and Ra!. 0#out one month a%ter that 1 got a hone call %rom Bill. )e said @=ould !ou li*e to come o"er to m! house. 1 said, @+ure.@ 1 got to his house and we tal*ed %or a#out two hours. 0t the end o% our tal* 1 as*ed Bill i% 1 could ha"e a co ! o% the circuit diagram. )e said, @+ure. 0%ter all,!ou in"ented the thing.@ This is where the #ad art comes in. =hat the hell ha ened to Bill and Ra! with this #o>P The! ne"er did an!thing with it. )ere is the good art, the circuit diagram as he drew it 1 ha"e onl! co ied it in m! aint rogram. 1T$+ 52,R+, )0.E F,/. 1 /E.ER B,14T 1T. 1 2/45 )0& 0/ 1&E0 0B2,T 0 -2RT0B4E B0TTER5 C)0RGER 52, /E.ER )0& T2 -4,G 1/T2 T)E =044 F2R -2=ER. +ome things in the circuit loo* wrong to me. But this is the circuit just the wa! 1 recei"ed it. +o that$s what 1$m utting on the age. 1 ha"e not studied this circuit and 1 ha"en$t #uilt it. 1$m just gi"ing !ou the in%ormation. =0R/1/GG B0TTER5 C2,4& EQ-42&E 1F 52, )0.E F0,4T5 C2//ECT12/+. B,14& 0T 52,R 2=/ R1+9. Good 4uc* 3ohn Bedini

1 might sa! something here, Ron Cole and 1 wor*ed together, some o% the circuits )e did others 1 did. =e are still "er! good %riends to this da!, e>ce t that 1 mo"ed to 1daho and Ron sta!ed in Cali%ornia, #ut we still tal* on the hone to each other.

-ETER -EREGR1,+ M2T2R

-ermanent magnetic motor
This was written in old english. =e did the #est we could. 1n this cha ter 1 will re"eal to !ou the wa! o% constructing a continuall! mo"ing wheel, ela#orated with mar"elous ingenuit!, in the ursuit o% which in"ention 1 ha"e seen man! eo le wandering a#out, and wearied with mani%old toil. For that the! did not o#ser"e that the! could arri"e at the master! o% this #! means o% the "irtue, or ower o% this stone. For the construction o% this wheel, !ou shall re are a sil"er case, li*e the case o% a mirror, hollowed out, wor*ed within with s*ill%ul wor*manshi , with car"ings and er%orations, which !ou shall ma*e %or the mere sa*e o% BE0,T5, and o% lightening the weightG %or the lighter it shall #e, the more swi%tl! it will mo"e. 5ou shall, howe"er, ma*e the er%orations so that the E5E 2F T)E 1G/2R0/T M05 /2T -ERCE1.E 1/+1&E T)E C0+E, what is cunningl! ut therein. But inside let there #e small claws or teeth o% iron, o% one another, so that the! #e not distant %rom one another more than the #readth o% a #ean or the thic*ness o% a ea. But let the said wheel #e uni%orm in weight o% its arts. 0nd then %i> an a>is through the middle, a#out which the wheel ma! re"ol"e, the a>is remaining Auite immo"a#le. To this a>is also let a small sil"er #ar #e added, %i>ed to it, situated #etween the two cases, at the end o% which let a magnet #e set, re ared in this manner. 4et it #e rounded and its oles %ound, as has #een said. 0%terward let it #e %ashioned in the same sha e o% an egg, without touching the oles, and let it #e thinned down a little on two o osite sides #etween the oles, so that it ma! #e %lattened in sha e, in order that it ma! occu ! less room, so that it ma! not touch the sides o% the case on the inside in the motion o% the wheel. 0nd ha"ing #een so %ashioned, let it #e laced on the small #ar, li*e a stone in a ring, and let the north ole #e a little inclined toward the teeth o% the wheel, so that the "irtue ma! %low into the iron teeth not along a diameter, #ut with some inclinationG so that when an! tooth shall ha"e come to the north ole, and shall #e assed a little #e!ond the same in conseAuence o% the im etus o% the wheel, it ma! a roach the southern art, which will re el rather than attract it, as is clear %rom the rule ro ounded a#o"e. 0nd to each tooth will mo"e continuall! in a er etual state o% attraction.

0nd in order that the wheel ma! %ul%ill its art the more, swi%tl!, shut u #etween the cases a little round #ead o% #rass or sil"er, o% such si:e as ma! #e contained #etween an! two teethG so that when the wheel is raised, the #ead will %all on the o osite side. =here%or when the motion o% the wheel is continuous toward one side, the %all o% the #ead also will li*ewise #e continuous toward the o osite side #eing recei"ed #etween each air o% teeth o% the wheel er etuall!G and see*ing #! its weight, the center o% the wheel or o% the earth, it will ro"e an assistance, and will not let the teeth rest in a direct line with the stone. But let the s aces #etween the teeth #e con"enientl! recessed, so that the! ma! #e a#le to hold the #ead ro erl! in the direction o% its %all, as the resent descri tion shows. F0RE=E44...... Finished in cam , at the siege o% 4,CER0, in the !ear o% our 42R& 16?E on the 'th da! o% 0,G,+T endeth this treatise.

This e istle o% -eter -ereginus, on the magnet written in 16?E, is done into E/G41+) #! +il"anus -. Thom son %rom the rinted latin "ersions, Bertell 1'?', and )ellmann 1'E', and amended #! re%erence to the manuscri t co ! in his osession, %ormerl! amongst the -alli s Manuscri ts, dated 1<E1, and is rinted in the

!ear 1E76, in the ca>ton t! e, #! Charles =hittingham R Co. at the Chiswic* -ress, to the num#er o% 6;7 co ies o% which this is F6( #! T.T.

-.-eregrinus -C16?E 0.&.D To 4ee Bowmen in 1EH;.

-eter -eregrinus is credited with the de"elo ment o% the %irst *nown and recorded ermanent magnet motor in 16?E.)is orignal wor* is on %ile at the /ew 5or* Cit! -u#lic 4i#rar!. The -eregrinus -.M.M. wor* remained dormant o"er the centuries until it was re"i"ed #! Mr.4ee Bowman o% Cali%ornia in 1EH;. =ho e"ol"ed a small scale wor*ing model. The de"ice consisted o% three arallel sha%ts su orted in #earings within end lates secured to a solid #ase late. Three gears were secured at one end o% each o% the three sha%ts, at a two-to-one ratio, with one larger gear on the central sha%ts, as shown. 0t the o osite end, three discs were secured to the sha%ts ends with one larger disc on the central sha%t, and the two eAual si:e smaller discs on the two, outer sha%ts. The discs were also %i>ed at a two-to-one ratio, the same as the gear ratios at the o osite sha%ts ends. Eight 0lnico rod ermanent magnets were eAuall! s aced on the one large disc, and %our magnets each on the two smaller discs, so that the! would coincide in osition when the three discs were re"ol"ed. The elongated 0lnico ermanent magnets were laced on each o% the discs so that the! re"ol"ed arallel to the sha%ts, and their ends assed each other with a close air ga o% a#out .77H@. =hen the discs were mo"ed #! hand, the magnets assing each other were so hased as to #e s!nchroni:ed at each assing osition, as shown in the s*etches. The o eration o% the magnetic de"ice reAuired the ositioning o% a single c!lindrical ermanent magnet which was laced at an angle relati"e to the lower Auadrant o% the end discs, as shown. This single magnet acted as the actuator magnet which caused the rotation o% the discs #! un#alancing the nagnetic %orces o% the three magnetic discs. The Bowman magnetic motor was witnessed #! se"eral eo le including an electrical engineer who was im ressed with its o eration at the time o% the demonstration. 0lthough the Bowman de"ice had recei"ed some e> osure it ne"er recei"ed an! de"elo ment interest and was e"entuall! dismantled and destro!ed, with no records made o% its de"elo ment otential.

1&E0+ 0/& M2T2R+

)ere are some sim le e> eriments that !ou can do %or !oursel%. 5ou er%orm these e> eriments at @52,R 2=/ R1+9@.....

-rotot! e 0dams Motor

-rotot! e G-Field Generator

E/ERG5 M0C)1/E -1CT,RE+

This is a

icture o% the %irst G-Field test unit that 1 #uilt the e%%icienc! was 167T.

This is a icture o% 3ohn Bedini testing a three #atter! Tesla +witch. The lights are 167 watt Auart: lam and a 177 watt 11H " house lam .

This is a

icture o% the Tesla +witch and the @)1G) .24T0GE@ that a ears across the out ut.

This is a

icture o% a small model G-Field that Ron Cole made to test the e%%icienc!. er%ormed #! Ron Cole 2n two G-Field Generators.

The test were

1n ut -ower, 2ut ut -ower, and 4oad Res 1n 2hms Test 1 1n ut -ower 6H.; .olts at <.E7 0m sU EE.77 =atts , 2ut ut -ower ;' "olts /o 4oad Test 6 1n ut -ower 6H.< .olts at <.E7 0m sU E'.?( =atts , 2ut ut -ower 6' .olts .(H 0m sU 61 =atts at <(.<< 2hms Test < 1n ut -ower 67 .olts at <.<E 0m sU ?(.'7 =atts , 2ut ut -ower H7 .olts at <.(7 0m sU 1'H.1E =atts at 1<.H7 2hms Test ; 1n ut -ower 61.E .olts at 6.<7 0m sU H7.<( =atts , 2ut ut -ower 67 .olts at <1.(H 0m sU ?<;.E6 =atts at .?< 2hms The a#o"e test results were o#tained %rom a small *romre! generator, #uilt #! 3ohn Bedini in 1E'<. The test was conducted #! Tom Bearden, and 3ohn Bedini in late 1E'<G 4ater the! were recon%irmed #! &r. -atric* Flanagan. The test were conducted in a manor as to ro"e the con"erters most #asic conce tO C1n ut -owerD "ersus C2ut ut -owerD into a usa#le load. The connection to re lace used energ! to the #atter! as a sel% charging action was not in lace, so as to re"ent an! con%using re%le> %actors. 0ll o% the a#o"e recon%irmed #!, Ron Cole, on the e"ening o% 11-E1E';. =e also o#tained results that %ar e>ceeded the results shown a#o"e, when the #atter! sel% charging circuit was connected. Ron Cole 11-1<-'; +u# /oteG +mall 1I6 0), /iCad Batteries were used %or in ut +ource.

This is a

icture o% the %inal test unit Ron Cole made the G-Field generator is owering a (.H =att load.

This is a

icture o% the small G-Field a%ter changing the motor

3ames =atson, one o% the more ad"anced o% current e> erimenters, has #uilt se"eral demonstration machines, each with increasing

er%ormance. Each o"ercomes its own internal %riction and recharges its own #atteries. 0s o% this writing, he is wor*ing on a solid state de"ice. This writer will closel! %ollow his rogress and ro"ide all ossi#le encouragement.

This is a

icture o% a small G-Field Generator #uilt #! Bedini Electronics 1E';.

This is a

icture o% the Tesla +witch #uilt #! Ei*e Mueller the load is a <H7 watt Auart: light

The )amel + inning &isc

The wor* o% &a"id )amel is one o% the most im ortant things to Man*ind e"er to #e released. 1 could not %ind a ring Magnet that #ig, so 1 #uilt a @Magnetic Gate@ to re lace the +olid Magnet,onl! to disco"er other things. This led Me to #elie"e that a @Rotar! -ermanent Magnet Motor@ could #e #uilt "er! sim l! #! e"er!one.

1n this diagram o% the Magnetic Gate 1$m showing that a c!lindrical magnet is ulled into the gate and #eing %orced out the other side. The wa! 1 thin* a#out this is that there is a @Magnetic com#ustion@ that ta*es lace in a %ield o% :ero. The Magnetic Field on the in ut side is s inning just li*e a tornado. =hen the Magnet reaches the center the s ins go the other direction %orcing the Magnet out. 1t was disco"ered that when two li*e oles are ushed together the out ut #eam is %our times greater. &o the sim le e> eriment !oursel%, ta*e two Magnets ush the li*e oles together and at that

oint the ower o% the magnet should #e %our times greater and the normal oles should #e two times wea*er. More to come on this motor

This drawing will allow you to reproduce what Favid >amel said about 'T>+ HQTT+I(7J +((+MT'

Magnetic -ictures
B! Greg =atson These are ictures o% the c!linder magnet going through the @Magnetic Gate@

These are

ictures o% the tilt angles

These are

ictures #! 3ean -4ouis /audin o% the c!linder Magnet going through the @Magnetic Gate@

Bedini 9choolgirl schematic for beginners

These = schematics are the best ones to start with to learn the 'edini circuits. ?on't worry about energy recovery and charging batteries with them. &ust build this to learn the prinicples of the monopole.

@ didn't even know what a transistor was when @ build my first one. 2hen you looked at the circuit, it literally looked like the schematic. Aou don't have to spend a lot of money either. @ used a pink roller skate wheel from a J= pair of roller skates from the 0oodwill.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E3 2 ermalin*5

0063062007, 10:03 *-

sykavy
enior *ember ;uote7

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 <L<

9riginally Posted by "aron These * schematics are the best ones to start with to learn the 3edini circuits. Don.t worry about energy recovery and charging batteries with them. 'ust build this to learn the prinicples of the monopole. I didn.t even know what a transistor was when I build my first one. When you looked at the circuit, it literally looked like the schematic. 0ou don.t have to spend a lot of money either. I used a pink roller skate wheel from a N* pair of roller skates from the Aoodwill.

than6 so much @ never thought id get such a great welcome. @m going to try it, so @ may not be posting much until i get it working

0od bless

s!*a"! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by sykavy E0 2 ermalin*5 0063062007, 11:1C *-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur easy to do

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Aou'll probably get it working on the first try. %se a <.ohm resistor to start with, easier to get it running on that. ,ot as efficient, but 5ust get it to work. < E <.ohm resistor < E <,H<L diode < E *P -.HH transistor or R$>G.MM or =,G.MM either of those will work fine 0et enough wire of N=G and N=O or closest you can find for those. Enamel coated magnet wire..enough to wind about O.. turns on the coil to the dimensions in those schematics. *ake sure to wind it so that when you put P top the top of the coil and ) at the bottom that the magnetic field on the coil is ,9RTI at the T9P. 2ind both of those wires together at the >*E time around the spool. The core for the coil can be a soild piece of iron or use a bunch of smaller pieces of welding rod cut to lenght and bundled together. The transistor has a collector, emitter and base. The collector is the input, the emitter it the output. 2ith these ,P, transistors, there is no connection through the transistor from collector to emitter. The faucet is shut off basically. To make the connection, it re4uires a bit of current at the base...that is what the trigger wire is for. That turns it on and when the power is no longer at the base, the transistor shuts off. @t is 5ust an off and on switch triggered by the base. 2hen you buy the transistor, the package will give you a diagram or you can find it online which lead is what. '$E are the G you need to know. &ust connect the coil wires, diode and resistor to each other like in the diagrams &ohn drew. The resistor doesn't matter which way you put it. The diode, the little black stripe needs to

be towards the base of the transistor. *ake sure the wheel spins really, really easily. 9ne little spin and it 5ust keeps going. Aou can make it like mine where the wheel spins around the shaft or you can make it fi6ed to the shaft so the shaft spins in some bearings in the frame uprights. Aou can use regular ceramic magnets on the rotor. &ust make sure ,orth is facing out on all L magnets so that south are all facing towards the a6le. The little black sealed gel cell batts are good ones to play with for starters. %se <= volt ones. 2hen it is all hooked up, you give a slight little spin on the wheel and it will 5ust start speeding up as fast as it can go. 2hen you get it running with these parts !use the <.ohm resistor", then you can switch out the resistor to something like a O-.ohm to see if it will run on that. Aou basically want as much resistance as possible while still letting enough get through to trigger the transistor. That is the idea anyway. There are a :9T of people around the world who have build these 'edini machines so you won't have a problem getting people to help you out.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron EC 2 ermalin*5 0C60262007, 0/:0/ *-

sykavy
;uote7

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 <L<

enior *ember

9riginally Posted by "aron Aet enough wire of H*, and H*I or closest you can find for those. ?namel coated magnet wire..enough to wind about I"" turns on the coil to the dimensions in those schematics. . > couple of 4uestions what is enough wireQ and

2hat is Enamel coates magnetic wireQ @s the wire magneticQ That looks like three 4uestions mea cupa

s!*a"! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by sykavy ED 2 ermalin*5 0C60362007, 12:3C &-

>aron
magnet wire

piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Ii

ykavy,

The enamel coated magnet wire is copper wire with a transparent coating of enamel. @t comes in different thicknesses measured in guage like =G, =O, etc... the lower the number the fatter it is. The wire isn't magnetic but when wound into a coil and power is applied, it will turn into an electromagnet. The wire is insulated with the enamel so the wire dosn't short itself. Aou want enough wire to wind O.. turns of both wires at the same time. <..)=.. feet of each should be enough. &ust wind the coil so that it fills out to the spool ends. Follow the dimensions of the coil in &ohn's drawings. <..)=.. feet doesn't cost that much and you can get at most electronic supply places in most towns. @ buy wire by weight like <. pound spools of whatever gauge...That is a lot more than you need, but shop around.

> couple of 4uestions what is enough wireQ and 2hat is Enamel coates magnetic wireQ @s the wire magneticQ

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E7 2 ermalin*5 0C60362007, 03:02 *-

sykavy
enior *ember ;uote7

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 <L<

9riginally Posted by "aron 5i Sykavy, The enamel coated magnet wire is copper wire with a transparent coating of enamel. It comes in different thicknesses measured in guage like *,, *I, etc... the lower the number the fatter it is. The wire isn.t magnetic but when wound into a coil and power is applied, it will turn into an electromagnet. The wire is insulated with the enamel so the wire dosn.t short itself. 0ou want enough wire to wind I"" turns of both wires at the same time. 1""7*"" feet of each should be enough. 'ust wind the coil so that it fills out to the spool ends. 2ollow the dimensions of the coil in 'ohn.s drawings. 1""7*"" feet doesn.t cost that much and you can get at most electronic supply places in most towns. I buy wire by weight like 1" pound spools of whatever gauge...That is a lot more than you need, but shop around.

# couple of -uestions what is enough wire@ and What is ?namel coates magnetic wire@ Is the wire magnetic@ ThanksB @ also don't know how to tell the north from the south on the magnets. >lso when @ wind the spool does it have to be a special materialQ Iow do @ know which end of the spool of wire is northQ hould the winding be very tightQ P 7 The first law of history is not to dare to utter falsehoodD the second, not to fear to speak the truth

s!*a"! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by sykavy E) 2 ermalin*5 0C60/62007, 10:30 *-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur John Bedini D !adiant nergy

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

&ohn 'edini R Radiant Energy

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E/ 2 ermalin*5 0C61)62007, 00:27 &-

sykavy

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 <L<

enior *ember

;uote7

9riginally Posted by "aron 'ohn 3edini O >adiant ?nergy the radiant stuff is cool and i can understand some of it but it isnt really the basic stuff i thought this thread was about. Iow do i know the difference between north and south pole on the magnetQ @m not 5oking , i really dont know.

@ made my

0 according !i think" to the plans you gave me above but the coil gets very hot

in a short time. Iave i done something wrongQ

s!*a"! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by sykavy E10 2 ermalin*5 0C61)62007, 0D:3/ &-

>aron

piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

how to tell north from south

Ii

ykavy, @ apologi#e. @ forgot to answer your 4uestion about the poles.

click the thumbnail picture below. Aes, wrap the coil pretty tight and wrap both wires together...both the trigger and power wire together. The thumbnail picture below !click it" shows how to wrap the coil so that when you put P at the top and ) at the bottom, you will get a ,9RTI field at the top of the coil. >s long as the wire at the top is coming off the coil towards you from around the right side and the bottom wire is coming off the coil towards you from around the left side and you put P and ) as shown, you will get a ,9RTI field at the top. @ like to start with the wires coming off the bottom of the coil poking off from the left side pointing at me. Then, @ wrap upwards and down up and down up and down and @ try to end at the very top...that is 5ust to prevent confusion, you could of course end them both at the top and both at the bottom, but this makes it simple. @f you wind the coil like that you get the north field when a battery is attached to the coil. Then if you take a permanent magnet and put a fact towards the coil like this, it will repel if you are facing the north of the magnet to the coil. @f you have south facing coil, it will suck to the coil when the coil is powered. @ hope this helps. $an you draw a diagram of e6actly what you build and the components you used, si#e of wire and how many wraps, etc... did you wrap it like @ described or did you wrap it backwardsQ Aou can make the whole thing work in reverse but if you are able to easily, @ would unwind the coil and rewrap it properly like the diagram.

@ didn't post that 'edini link for you to go figure it out yourself, @ 5ust did that to provide a link. This thread is intended for first time schoolgirl motor builders. >ttached @mages coil.gif !<O.H /', GHO views"

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E11 2 ermalin*5 0C61)62007, 00:C/ *-

sykavy
enior *ember ;uote7

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 <L<

9riginally Posted by "aron 5i Sykavy, I apologiLe. I forgot to answer your -uestion about the poles. click the thumbnail picture below. 0es, wrap the coil pretty tight and wrap both wires together...both the trigger and power wire together. The thumbnail picture below 8click it9 shows how to wrap the coil so that when you put P at the top and 7 at the bottom, you will get a :)>T5 field at the top of the coil. #s long as the wire at the top is coming off the coil towards you from around the right side and the bottom wire is coming off the coil towards you from around the left side and you put P and 7 as shown, you will get a :)>T5 field at the top. I like to start with the wires coming off the bottom of the coil poking off from the left side pointing at me. Then, I wrap upwards and down up and down up and down and I try to end at the very top...that is 1ust to prevent confusion, you could of course end them both at the top and both at the bottom, but this makes it simple. If you wind the coil like that you get the north field when a battery is attached to the coil. Then if you take a permanent magnet and put a fact towards the coil like this, it will repel if you are facing the north of the magnet to the coil. If you have south facing coil, it will

suck to the coil when the coil is powered. I hope this helps. 4an you draw a diagram of e&actly what you build and the components you used, siLe of wire and how many wraps, etc... did you wrap it like I described or did you wrap it backwards@ 0ou can make the whole thing work in reverse but if you are able to easily, I would unwind the coil and rewrap it properly like the diagram. I didn.t post that 3edini link for you to go figure it out yourself, I 1ust did that to provide a link. This thread is intended for first time schoolgirl motor builders. Thanks, but why is the coil getting so hotQ This seems to be my biggest problem. @ll try it and get back to you thanks again for the help

s!*a"! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by sykavy + onsored 4in*s

E12 2 ermalin*5 0)60C62007, 12:20 *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

hamus
enior *ember

Ii all, @'m new here so bear with me if this is all old hat. @'ve been building my recreation of the schoolgirl and she's not behaving very well. @'ve already burned out two transistors, one by trying to solder the coil wire to the case))way too much heatB))and the otherQ ,ot sure what happened there. >t any rate, trying to chase down magnet wire around here !>ustin, TE area" has been difficult to say the least. ure, you can get it at Radio hack or Fry's, but only in ridiculously small 4uantities like L. ft. !for N==" and KM ft. !for N=O". Aou can get a whopping =.. ft. of NG., but that's probably way too small. o, the problem is most likely in my coil))@ was only able to get G-- turns out of that KM ft.

of N=O which was wrapped bifilar with N=L. @n checking the coil with a voltmeter and spinning the rotor near it only around M m8 ma6 comes through as induced current. @'m guessing that this is not nearly enough current to bias the transistor on. 2hen sending current through the coil, though, it generates a good kick. @f @ pulse current through it by hand, @ can get the rotor to turn fairly well. >nyway, a few 4uestions come to mind about this circuit. First, @ notice that there's a ground connection shown))is this strictly necessaryQ @ saw on this page !near the bottom" that the circuit is almost identical !the only difference is the diode going to the recharge battery", but they caution that if there is no load that a neon bulb is re-uired to keep the transistor from burning out. @s that the purpose of the ground in this circuitQ The other thing is @ notice a lot of bifilar windings have the wires twisted around each other. @s that really necessary to get this to workQ Perhaps the better 4uestion would be does it confer an advantage over winding the wires side by side !the way @ did my coil"Q @'ll post some pictures once @ get this thing going. @'m almost <..S sure that the problem is that there's 5ust not enough turns on my coil to induce enough current to bias the transistor. @'ve got some longer magnet wire lengths on order, so once those arrive we'll see what happens.

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E13 2 ermalin*5 0)60C62007, 00:03 *-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur hot transistor

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Ii

hamus,

@f the transistor gets hot, @'m not sure it is from to few turns on the coil. There are two things @ would double check. >re the wires wrapped in the correct direction around the coilQ @s the power wire going to P on the battery coming off around the right side of the coil towards youQ >nd is the power wire going to the collector on the transistor coming off the coil from around the left side of the coilQ >nd are the magnets for sure ,orth

facing outQ These can still run even if everything is backwards and if so, it can heat up...@'ve e6perimented with that and got a hot transistor. @ know this seems so simple that it can never be backwards but sometimes it is the simplest thing. Iave you tried spinning the wheel faster to get more induction to kick it offQ @deally, it will start by barely moving the rotor. @f you have a lower resistance resistor at the base like a <.ohm, it will run way easier than a O-. for e6ample but is less efficient but if you want to at least see if it all hooked up properly, drop the resistance and try it out. :ower resistance needs less speed on the rotor to get it going. @f the coil is wrapped correctly as indicated above and you hook it to a battery, the north field should push up on the ,orth magnet facing out on the rotor. 9f course you already know this but @'d make sure these = things are absolutely correct. 2hat components are you usingQ Transistor, resistor, diodeQ Aou can see in my picture here of the roller skate motor that @ have a =nG.MM transistor and there isn't a H.v neon bulb. Aou don't really need it @ don't think unless you have 4uite a few more turns. Aou can twist the power and trigger wire together before wrapping on coil for a little more efficiency. ,ot necessary if you 5ust want a simple model to learn from. @ wouldn't worry about a diode going to a =nd battery because you can always add that later. @t sounds like you could use more turns. The wire @ buy is sometimes on like <. pound spools of various si#es !and weights"...much cheaper per foot than the radio shack wire. Aou don't need an e6ternal ground. @ hope some of these things help.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E10 2 ermalin*5 0)60C62007, 0):00 *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

hamus
enior *ember

Ii >aronB

>s far as the coil goes, @ followed the directions for winding as you set forth above. 2hen @ energi#e it with the !P" coming off the top lead and !)" off the bottom, it's a north pole with 4uite a bit of kick !@ tested both the N=L portion and the N=O portion, and both are 4uite powerful as electromagnets ". @ verified north on my magnets by hanging one on a piece of thread and seeing which side faced north, and labeled the side facing that way as (north(. @ then checked all the rest of my magnets by checking for repulsion with the known north face and labeled all the repulsed sides (north( as well. The core is made up of = <F= inch nails epo6ied together with the heads cut off, cut to length, and the points sanded down. The components are the stock ones suggested by the schematic7 > =,G.MM transistor, a <,H<L diode, and a <. ohm, <F= watt resistor !too much wattageQ seems unlikely to me". @'m using a battery consisting of <.M8 >> cells))one at O8F=.G>, and another at <=8F->. There isn't any deviation from what's suggested up above other than the lack of turns on my coil. >lso, it doesn't induce enough current even if @ give the rotor a good spin. Pictures follow. @n the closeup of the circuit, the clips are not shorting out with the collector. @ decided to go with clips after losing the second transistor and thinking that my diode had blown. This way, @ can test components without having to solderFdesolder anything. >lso, @ connect !P" from my battery to the red lead coming from the top of the coil, and connect the !)" to the emitter !the clip on the bottom right of the circuit closeup". The second transistor blew when @ gave the rotor a good spin and it acted as if it were magnetically braking the rotor))the coil and transistor heated up 4uite a bit on that run. @ have since verified and reverified that the coil is hooked up correctly to the battery and that the coil produces a north magnetic field out the top that repulses each and every magnet on the rotor. The only thing that looks different in my setup is the number of turns on my coil, but there could be something else that @'ve overlooked. >ttached @mages schoolgirl)circuit.5pg !O=.L /', =GO views" circuit)closeup.5pg !G-.= /', =.O views" coil)closeup.5pg !GM.- /', <H. views" electromagnet)closeup.5pg !=H.H /', =<G views" rotor)closeup.5pg !LK.G /', =<M views" schoolgirl)<.5pg !L-.G /', =GH views"
Fast edited by Shamus Q "$7"I7*""! at "*Q+I B(. >easonQ Feft stuff outEincorrect clip ID

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E1C 2 ermalin*5 0)60762007, 07:23 *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

enior *ember

hamus

EEE 9uccess EEE

9/, yesterday @ finally tracked down a local supplier of magnet wire after @ found out that the wire @ ordered over the internet wouldn't arrive for T29 2EE/ . >t any rate, @ finally wound O.. turns of N== and N=O on my core !after removing the G-- turns that were already sitting on it ", hooked up the alligator clips, and successB

ome preliminary tests showed interesting results. @t went at a pretty good clip when @ had the <=8 battery hooked up, but it seemed to run faster with only O8 !going by the pitch the bearings were putting out". $uriouser and curiouser. The current draw was only about <FL of an amp with the O8, which should go down once @ replace the <. ohm resistor with a O-.. >lso, my coil runs hot too. o much so, that loosened the epo6y on the back side of the coil

spoolB *y guess as to why it's running hot is that there's 5ust too much 5uice going through it, which upping the resistance should help with))@ mean, come on, <. ohms isn't much. >t any rate, @ hope to post some more rigorous results here once @ get my coil

back together.

>nd oh... The 4uestions, the 4uestions... *ore later.

+hamus

8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E1D 2 ermalin*5 0)60762007, 10:37 *-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur congradsE

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

0lad you got it workingB > few things for the efficiency is that you want as weak as magnets as possible but strong enough to 5ust induce enough to trigger the base and also you want as much resistance at the base as possible while still letting the minimum through 5ust to trigger the base. The magnets you have look like the radio shack ones with the hole in the middleQ Probably fine. 'efore you added more winds, it might have been possible to get it to run if you double stacked those magnets !with the fewer winds". 2hen you replace the resistor to O-., if it seems like it is difficult to get started, you can 5ust double stack the magnets. >nyway, post your results...looking forward to it. >lso, you might see that when it gets going, it will speed up and start drawing up to the <FL amp you see, then it might start speeding up even more and the input might start dropping backwards. /ind of like shifting into higher gear but input drops. @'ll post a video of my roller skate wheel video...has about O.. turns. That is the very first one @ ever did and it got me hookedB :9:

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E17 2 ermalin*5 0)61062007, 02:3/ &-

hamus
enior *ember

&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

Preliminary results

9/, now that @'ve swapped out the <. ohm for a O-. ohm resistor the coil is running nice and cool. @t might be better to advise using the O-. ohm first and fall back on the <. ohm

only as a last resort, since it seems to cause some serious coil heating. 2ith the O-. ohm in place @ do have to give it a pretty good spin to get it going, but that could be due to not enough turns on the coil, suboptimal bearings, unbalanced rotor, etc. ,ow @'m getting some interesting results))before the O8 battery seemed to kick the <=8 in the tail but now the <=8 is doing ama#ing thingsB Iere are some nominal measurements !these are crude 'T2 because my meter is kinda low end"7 T O87 K.)-. m>, low RP* !guess)timate in the <..)G.. range" T<=87 <M. m>, high RP* !guess)timate around double or so" 9n one of those test runs with the <=8 battery the rotor started spinning very fast !several times faster than the above measurement showsB" and @ got a little nervous))@ didn't want to have a magnet go flying into my chest at high velocity, tape or no tape. o @ unhooked the battery and let it run down and decided to try again. This time it didn't spin up as fast and @ couldn't get the coil as close to the rotor as before !definitely makes a difference in RP*B", so @ shut it down again and found one side of one of the magnets had come loose. >pparently the glue @ used doesn't bond well to ceramic magnets. o @ got out the epo6y and glued it back down and tonight @ gave a demonstration to my lovely wife !who doesn't know what to make of this stuff " and it spun up to high RP* once more on the <=8 battery. >nd, 5ust my luck, another magnet came loose which put an end to tonights e6perimentation. @ have a feeling @'m going to have reglue the entire rotor. :et this be a lesson to all of you e6perimenting with this thing7 *ake sure that you have some sturdy tape on the outside of your rotor))it will save you baconB >t any rate, before the magnet came loose @ was looking at the amp draw as the rotor spun up on the <=8 battery. @t started around L. m> and then settled a bit around <.. m>. Then it took offD the draw was steadily climbing up to <H. m> as the RP* increased. %nfortunately, the noise from the bearings was making me nervous as it's a repurposed sliding glass door bearing meant for a vertical application and very low RP*))and here @ have it hori#ontal and high RP*. @ have a feeling it would have gone even faster and then the amps would probably settle back down. @'ll have to get a bo6 to put it into and 5ust let it go as fast as it wants and see what happens.

>fter that, @'ll 5ust have to hang a diode between the coil and the collector and see what's there. @ know there's definitely something there because one time as @ was checking the transistor to see if it was heating up @ accidentally shorted the collector and the base with my finger while it was running and received a pretty good bite))definitely more than <= voltsB %ltimately @'d like to videotape the meter so @ can make a nice graph of what's going on !basically amps vs. time, though @ think amps vs. RP* would more interesting before this is all over @'ll have to find m'self a tachometer. ". @ guess

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E1) 2 ermalin*5 0)61062007, 0C:0D &&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K Posts7 <,H.=

/evin
Energetic cience Practitioner

.ongrats 9hamusE

Iey

hamus

$ongrats on getting your ' 0 runningB @ can testify, the magnets can do damage. @ had one fly off my wheel and imbed itself in some drywall. >fter that, since @ am using a bicycle wheel, @ taped them each individually around the rim. 9ne relatively ine6pensive tool that @ use to measure the performance is a digital tachometer similar to the one found at this link7

,9, $9,T>$T ?@0@T>: :> ER PI9T9 T>$I9*ETER ) ,E2 ) !item ==.<GO-H..KM end time >ug)<.).K <=7=L7.L P?T" Regarding your voltage, that is more e6pensive to measure, an oscilloscope can show you the voltage and the wave form. @ found the best on my current set)up is putting out about <-. volts !input is <= volts". Iave funB

9e"in 8iew Public Profile 8isit /evin's homepageB Find all posts by /evin E1/ 2 ermalin*5 0)61262007, 00:C) &&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

hamus
enior *ember

,ore results

T>aron7 @ forgot to mention, yes, the magnets are the Radio

hack variety. 0ood eyeB

T/evin7 Thanks for the heads upB @ definitely want to measure RP* in my setup to get a better picture of what's going on. 'T2, would you be willing to share some of your insights with the rest of us vis)a)vis improvements you've foundQ 9r has >aron already laid them all out aboveQ

9/, if this is getting boring 5ust let me know and @'ll shuddap. ome more interesting results tonight7 @t seems that the bearing has a large influence over the performance of this little machine. @ built an eight magnet rotor !for the ne6t step))results to be posted in a different thread once it's built magnet rotor. " and the short of it is that it performs better than the si6

ome of the gains are probably due to the fact that the eight was built better than the si6D where the si6 has slightly offset discs in relation to the bearing the eight is almost dead on and where on the si6 the magnets are attached to the edge slightly non)uniform !one of the magnets is visibly skewed 2RT the vertical" on the eight @ made sure that they were uniform. >t any rate, when @ first put the eight)magnet rotor on it didn't start at all with either O8 or <=8))@ thought that maybe the magnet spacing was insufficient. 'ut then @ thought that maybe the bearing hadn't loosened up enough !it's the same bearing as on the si6)magnet rotor " and thus broke out the spray lube. 9nce @ did that, it spun up 4uite well to some The current draw was around <=. m> T O8.

fairly high RP*.

@ then went back to the si6)magnet rotor and to my surprise it spun up pretty fast !albeit somewhat slowly" and drew about H. m> T O8. This seemed fishy to me, so once again @ reached for the can of spray lube and gave it sprit# while it was running. 9nce @ did that, it started going faster while the amps dropped to around M.)O. m>. 9n subse4uent runs, it never got above M. m> while the RP* seemed to be fairly moderate !no tach yet))B". o, to sum up, the bearings play a fair si#ed role in the performance of this machine. The ones @'m using have a fair amount of slop in them))somewhere in the neighborhood of <)G degrees from vertical which is bad, bad, bad. Aou can actually see the si6)magnet rotor precess at high RP*. >lso, @ had to reapply the spray lube to the eight)magnet rotor at least once, as during one run it spun up to the <=. m> point and then a few seconds later lost all power and stopped completely. 0ood bearings are vitalB 9n a side note, @ was wondering if anyone knows where to get various odds and ends such as spools and bearings. @nternet searches tend to lead either to 9E*s and industrial suppliers or to wild goose chases. @ did manage to find a few sealed pump bearings at the local neighborhood giant home improvement warehouse store. @ also found some perfect spools there))too bad they had JK worth of N<- stranded wire on them. Tinkerer's ?epot to be foundQ 2here is

+hamus

8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E20 2 ermalin*5 0)61262007, 0/:0C &&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K Posts7 <,H.=

/evin
hamus,

Energetic

cience Practitioner

Aour posts are ,9T boring....it is e6citing to hear of another traveling down the road of e6perimentation and discovering the same fantastic world of open systemsB *ost everything @ have done is from what >aron, Peter or &ohn have told me. @ did TR8 how to make it better, and got a few little tidbits that did improve output. @ have built several units, but the main one @ used to document thousands of hours of charging batteries utili#ed a <=' diameter bicycle wheel. tandard bearings which @ kept well greased. ?ouble stacked Radio hack rectangular magnets. *agnets are placed the with the space of two magnets in between each magnet pair. 9ne coil, but wrapped with wires for T29 circuits. @ use a variable resistor for each circuit. This is so @ can tune it for the optimum work put in to work output. @ use <= volt deep cycle !-M amp hour" batteries. !@ do have a few <= volt car batteries that had been discarded because they were (dead( that are in the rotation also" >ll my parts have been purchased at Radio hack or 2almart or ?igi)/ey, !?igi)/ey $orporation ) % > Iome Page" and @ got my wire at a motor rebuilding business !they also had old spools sitting around, and @ got a few of those from them".

>s soon as @ get <M. free hours !maybe this winter" @ am going to build a larger unit. Right now the plan is for - coils and G= circuits. *y calculation is that @ will be able to run my entire house off this unit.

9e"in 8iew Public Profile 8isit /evin's homepageB Find all posts by /evin E21 2 ermalin*5 0)61062007, 03:C7 *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

hamus
enior *ember

Time to move on

Thank you >aron, and especially /evin))the pieces are starting to fall into placeB 9f course it helps to have a copy of 2ree ?nergy Aeneration at hand. @ didn't reali#e 5ust how useful that photo gallery would be, especially when looking at &ohn 'edini's site and wishing @ had a closeup of some of his machines. This was a good first step, as all the things @'ve been reading about and seen are starting to come together as a coherent whole. @ have much more to say about the sub5ect of the 'edini motor, but @ think that this thread is probably not the right one to say it in. Iaving said that, @ will say this7 @ started to make the ne6t machine which will have four coils and four circuits !single)coilFmulti)circuit will be the third iteration". 'ut since it has only one coil and one circuit, you could consider it a 0 motor. @ was a bit disappointed to find that @ could only get around K.. turns from my <F= lb spool of N== wire))@ was hoping to get at least H... @ guess it's back to the internet sites to get a K lb. !or thereabouts" spool.

>t any rate, @ got it running last night and let it run overnight 5ust to see if it would, and it did. Even with the lousy bearing @ have in the rotor. @ put the diode in between the coil and the collector to see what was there and lo and behold @ saw some voltage spikes peaking around =..8B 9bviously my instrument is too slow to really see what's going on with that part of the circuit but it's enough to get an indication. ,eedless to say, it's a bit stunning to see it for the first time. >nd since at this point we're no longer talking about the basic schoolgirl design, @ will continue this discussion in a more appropriate thread. $omplete with pictures, tooB >ttached @mages schoolgirl)G.5pg !OK.O /', <HH views" L)coil)with)one)coil.5pg !M-.K /', ==O views" L)coil)circuit)closeup.5pg !K-.G /', <-M views"

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus + onsored 4in*s

E22 2 ermalin*5 0)61062007, 07:00 *&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K Posts7 <,H.=

/evin

Energetic

cience Practitioner

Ii

hamus

Thanks so much for the update. Aou are getting me e6cited to build my bigger unit....@ have actually been thinking about doing it an hour here and

there instead of waiting for a big block of time. IeyB Iave you touched your wire with your finger yet...the wire that is producing the voltage spikesQ 9ver my time of tuning @ did 4uite a few timesB Even though it is low amperage, <K.)==. volts is 4uite a #ap. :ooking forward to your ne6t updateB

9e"in 8iew Public Profile 8isit /evin's homepageB Find all posts by /evin E23 2 ermalin*5 0)61/62007, 00:22 &&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

hamus
enior *ember

9truggling through the concept

T/evin7 @f you didn't see my encouragement in the other thread, let me reiterate here))by all means do it an hour at a time if you have to and please post updatesB 9k, here's what @ see happening in this little circuit.

2hat follows is my take on what happens during one cycle. 2hen *r. 'edini said that his monopole motor was an attraction motor, something 5ust didn't sit right with me. 'ut, of course, now @ reali#e he was right7

2ith no current flow in the circuit, a rotor magnet is a attracted to the coil core and moves toward it. This induces a tiny current in both coil wires. Electrons flow from the back of the trigger coil to the front, through the resistor and diode and back the the rear of the trigger coil. @f enough current is present, it also flows through the base of the transistor and into the power coil.

9nce the base of the transistor has current flowing through it, current from the battery flows from the negative terminal of the battery, through the emitter of the transistor and out the collector, then through the rear of the coil and out the front to the positive terminal of the battery. >t this point, the current flowing through the coil creates a strong magnetic field, temporarily magneti#ing the coil core with a north pole in front and a south pole in back. This gives the rotor magnet a good strong kick in the direction it was traveling.

2ith the rotor magnet kicked away, there is no more induced current in the coil. $urrent flow at the base of the transistor stops and so the current path from the battery, through the transistor, is interrupted. >t this point the magnetic field in the coil collapses and, coupled with the brief amount of time that the coil was energi#ed by the battery, a radiant

event occurs in the coil accompanied by a high amount of voltage appearing with no current. >s the ne6t magnet on the rotor comes in, it is attracted to the coil core and the cycle repeats itself. ,ow this is what @'m seeing, but @ could be flat out wrong. @'m 5ust groping for an e6planation of how this little thing works. 9ne countere6ample is in the 'ediniF'eaden PP> where there is a picture of a waveform showing current in the trigger side of the circuit, one which strongly suggests a type of (ringing( oscillation as the current ramps up. 2hich means that my e6planation, while plausible, fails to e6plain the ringing oscillation of that picture. 9bviously, there are still some gaps in my knowledge here.

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E20 2 ermalin*5 0)61/62007, 07:1D &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur Bedini .ircuits are *"9 /"+/ 9

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Ii

hamus,

This isn't a direct response to you post...it is something @ posted =.M years ago in icubenetwork when it was online in relation to &ohn's circuits and the water fuel cells. 'ut, it applies to these circuits and is a perspective hardly anyone is talking about yet. ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 4iman<G Posted7 2ed *ar <O, =..M L7.H pm Post sub5ect7 coil importance The coil is e6tremely important. There is not one single component or aspect of this schematic that is not that important. Every piece is crucial to consider. That becomes apparent when you start to fine tune the energi#er. > few ohms difference in the resistor at the base can make a big difference in efficiency. @mpedance matching is important. Aou have to think of the circuit

as a gas pressure control system, since the aether acts e6actly like a gas under pressure. For e6ample, on one motor @ 5ust put together, with a <=volt <.M amp hour gel cell battery on one side and a Ovolt on the output smaller amp hour..the motor gets up to about =O.. rpm and outputs so much radiant. That is because with the higher impedance on the back end, it is acting like a pressure relief valve with a tight spring. The motor can only open up so much. 2hen @ put the same kind of battery on the back end <=volt, etc... The energi#er speeds up to L-.. rpm and output a hell of a lot more radiant into the battery. That is because it is like having a pressure relief valve with a looser spring or you can picture it having the ports on a head bored up or having racing headers instead of a stock e6haust manifold. @t lets more out with less back pressure. That is what is happening. @t isn't an electrical schematic, it is a device that moves the Ieaviside flow around under different pressures. @t is a valve for gas.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E2C 2 ermalin*5 0)61/62007, 07:27 &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur scalar south

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

hamus, @ think you're very intuitive with this. @ was thinking the same thing with the collapsed field attracting the north. Iave you seen &ohn's pics of the fields around the rotor.

Think maybe on this one that s4uee#ing out in between each magnet is a (scalar south( field. >ll the souths facing inwards are repelling and have nowhere to go but out between the magnets. ,ot only that.... if you take two identical magnets and put north up and space them a bit apart, there is a south field coming out between the two. There gets a point where the speed is such that as the north field is out and possibly hasn't collapsed yet, the south field is attracted to that @ suppose there are different ways to look at that but get a compass or other magnets and e6periment with feeling the south coming between the magnets

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E2D 2 ermalin*5 0)62162007, 03:10 &&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

hamus
enior *ember

,ore bloviation

> small shipment of magnet wire came in the other day and so @ finally got to wind up a <,... turn coil. @'ve been reduced to fabricating my own spools from P8$ pipe and other odd pieces of scrap and scratching my head trying to figure out how to keep flanges of the spools from falling off once too many turns are on it. @'m still waiting for the << lb. spool...

ince @ didn't have any batteries hanging off of the diode, @ figured this thread would be appropriate to post some more preliminary results. @ apologi#e for the paucity of hard data, but @ 5ust don't have enough meters to do the 5ob. <,... turn coil is much easier. >t any rate, starting the rotor with the

Running <=8, the current draw consistently went to =G.

m> while when running O8, the current draw was consistently H. m> !margin of error is PF) <. m>". @ did test the O)magnet rotor with the new coil at <=8 and it drew a steady =<. m> !didn't check O8". !slightly)offtopic"@ did check to see if the rotor RP* would drop with a load and it did as @'ve seen it do before.!Fslightly)offtopic" @t's interesting that the <=8 battery draws more than twice the current of the O8 battery with the same setup. @ guess that means that the resistance @ have set up on the trigger side !O-. ohms, 'natch" is more closely matched !or 'tuned'" to the O8 battery than to the <=8. The resistor isn't soldered in yet, so this calls for some e6perimentation. 9ne thing @ notice about &ohn 'edini's circuits is that there are no pots in any of them. >pparently he knows his coilsFcircuits well enough to choose an appropriate resistance and leave it at that. 9ne other item of note is that the current consumption seems to only go up no matter what voltage @ put on it. 2hich of course makes me wonder if my setup is correct, since it's supposed to speed up and then have the current draw go down. 'ut then again, perhaps that effect can't andFor doesn't occur in a single coil setup))@'m eager to get the multi)coil going. @t also could be that @ have lousy bearings and that the motor is trying to overcome that but 5ust can't. @n answer to your 4uestion, >aron, yes, @ have seen &ohn's picture of the magnetic fields around the rotor. @t's funny, @ always assumed those spokes were north fields. @t sheds a whole new light on things to see that those are south fieldsB Aes, @ tried magnets in those spaces and @ have to tell you, it was a little freaky to see the north face of a free magnet stick in between two rotor magnets which, as you know, are north facing outB right when he said this machine was deceptively simple. &ohn was

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E27 2 ermalin*5 0)62162007, 0):01 *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

hamus
enior *ember

!esults of changing base resistance

9k, first the results, then the analysis7

$ode7

Value (ohms) Measured mA@12V Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------680 678 230 820 818 210 1200 1184 170 1200+180 1363.6 1 0 1200+180+2.2 1366.6 1 0 1200+180+10 1374.3 1 0 !u"# at 140 mA the" sta$ed at 1 0 mA 1200+180+1 137%.4 1 0 &o' reso"a"(e o"(e s)*""*"#+ s)u" u) to h*#h ,-M. 120 mA '*th load 1200+180+22 1386.6 1%0 /ea0 reso"a"(e+ lo' )*t(h+ s)u" u) to lo' ,-M 1200+180+33 13%7.1 1%0 ,eso"a"(e+ lo'er )*t(hed+ s)u" u) to lo' ,-M 1200+180+3% 1403.3 1%0 ,eso"a"(e+ lo'er )*t(hed+ s)u" u) to lo' ,-M 1200+270 14 2 ,eso"a"(e+ lo'er )*t(hed+ 'ould "ot s)*" u) 1200+3%0 1 84 ,eso"a"(e+ lo'er )*t(hed+ 'ould "ot s)*" u) 1800 1784 370 mA reso"a"(e see"+ 'e"t "e#at*1e (2) am)s+ "o reso"a"(e a3ter that. 'ould "ot s)*" u) 2700 2680 ,eso"a"(e+ h*#her )*t(hed+ 'ould "ot s)*" u) . @t was pretty surprising to find self)resonant behavior))@ can see how people could get distracted by it. @t's also easy to see why the coil resists the rotor in that mode, since the circuit no longer self)regulates at that point. The rotor would have to be turning at the resonant fre4uency to stay spinningB *y meter can only measure down two significant digits at these amperages, so @'m pretty sure there's some differentiation at those levels marked <M. m>. @n particular, @'m thinking that <GKL.G ohm is probably closer to <M. m> than the other values. @'m also finally seeing the 'shifting into high gear' phenomenon that you were talking about, >aron, with the power consumption going down as the RP* goes up. is the key here. @t seems tuning

+hamus

8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E2) 2 ermalin*5 0)62262007, 02:C) &-

amigo
enior *ember

&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K Posts7 K<.

Iello everyone, Thought to make a first post here since @ will have some 4uestions about my contraption that @'ve built...@ mean 'edini *otor. @ can say that it actually works but @ have some 4uestionsFconcerns that @'d like feedback on. @ will soon post photos of my motor as well as my Fluke scope waveform because one of the 4uestions relates to the signal, right now @ 5ust thought to make a first post...

amigo 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by amigo E2/ 2 ermalin*5 0)62262007, 0D:0C &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur Bedini 9* youtube video

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

'edini

0 !roller skate wheel motor" video posted on youtube. 0) choolgirl ) 'are basic model

AouTube ) 'edini

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E30 2 ermalin*5 0)62262007, 0C:1C *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

enior *ember

hamus

9trangeness

> few days ago @ got some sealed lead)acid <=8 batteries rated at K>h and so today @ decided to give it a shot. @ checked the resting voltage of the battery @ was going to use and it was sitting at <=.-.8. @ tried to measure the amps coming out of it but @ nearly burned up my wires in trying to do so. @ think the meter was reading around <M> or so before @

reali#ed what was happening to my wires. o anyway, @ hooked it up to my setup !with <GKL ohms" and got lots of noise out of my coil and strong repulsion on the rotor. The amp reading was negative. omething strange was going on here... o @ pulled off the resistors and stuck what @ thought was O-. ohm resistor in and this time it spun right up. The current draw was around ML. m> !B" while the RP* was low. 2ell, it turns out that @ mistook a black band for brown and so it was really O- ohms on the trigger. > bit on the low side. @ then put an honest)to)0od O-. ohm resistor in place and it showed resonance right away. ,o chance of starting the rotor there. @ substituted a GH. ohm and this time no resonance in the coil although the current draw was around GH. m> with an RP* somewhere in the middle range of what @'ve seen with this setup. 2ith around LH. ohms the RP* did go up while the draw went to around GO. m>. @ had to stop testing, though, because @ noticed that the resistors were getting e6tremely hotB ,ow these are only rated at <FL2, but still, there shouldn't be that much 5uice flowing on the trigger side, should thereQ @ mean, we're talking m8Fm> range here on the trigger side. >t any rate, @'m off to get some beefier resistors so @ don't have to worry about them

burning up. 9n a side note, @ figured it might be useful to power this thing from a stock wall)wart P %. @ found one rated for H8?$ at <>, but it turns out these labels lie. @ measured <=.-G8 coming out !hey, it looks 5ust like a fresh batteryB " at around M> or so. o after my e6periments with the lead)acid battery came to a screeching halt, @ decided to try to power the current setup !at LH. ohms" with the P %. @t spun up to high RP* with only around a =K. m> draw. ,ow @'m really confused here. @ guess @ shouldn't be too surprised that the battery, with it's higher amps, should be pushing more current through this circuit than the P % which is putting out about three times less amps. 'ut it seems like the current draw should be the same, noQ 9n another side note, there's a good lesson here about resistor selection. @t seems that the optimal resistance depends heavily on the voltage being supplied on the front end. @ checked the voltage on the <=8 battery !made up of <.M8 cells" and it was around <..M8. 'oy, do @ feel foolish. !Fme smacks forehead"

Bedini 9* 9implified

'edini 0 discussion here. For single or multi coil andFor multi strand. The simplified version to charge batts without the cap setup.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron + onsored 4in*s

E2 2 ermalin*5 0C60/62007, 10:3C *-

>aron
John Bedini D !adiant

piritual Entrepreneur nergy

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

&ohn 'edini R Radiant Energy

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E< 2 ermalin*5 0D61062007, 12:C2 &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur "aron(s 9*

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

> 'edini circuit @ built with a reel to reel motor &ohn gave me a few years ago. Pretty cool and interesting 0. 8ery fast and very efficient. $harges batts pretty good. @ never measured efficiency. @f @ put < batt bank on the output or L, it doesn't really change the input it doesn't care. 9f course can grab the shaft to increase the load and the input does not increase. M... rpm it draws < amp avg <.,... rpm it draws only <FM of an amp avg 8ideo clip7 http7FFwww.esmhome.orgFlibraryFaaron...iFaaron)sg.wmv

0aron

8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E; 2 ermalin*5 0D61)62007, 0):3) &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur youtube video

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

&ohn 'edini R Radiant Energy can watch the reel to reel motor video on youtube.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron EH 2 ermalin*5 0)61762007, 00:10 &&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

hamus
enior *ember

9ome musings...

T/evin7 @ would strongly encourage you to do it an hour at a time if you have to, and please post progress reportsB power coil more than onceB >nd yes, @'ve gotten bit by the high voltage coming off the

2ell, since @'m kinda stuck at the moment waiting for magnet wire to arrive before @ can finish building the current machine, @ thought @'d post a few thoughts on it))even though only one coil is present, it's got a diode hanging off the collector, so it counts in my opinion. The schematic below shows its current state. Aes, curiosity got the better of me and @'ve tried charging <.M8 >> cells as part of a O8 battery. @t seems to work somewhat, though @ haven't done any rigorous testing. @ did notice that the rotor slows down when there's a battery in the charge position. @nterestingB @ know that you probably won't get optimum results using these types of cells, but it seems to me that if the negentropy process that Tom and &ohn talk about in the provisional patent application listed in 2ree ?nergy Aeneration is correct, then it should be possible to charge these kinds of cells as well. &ust a thought. >nother interesting thing that @'ve seen !er, heard" with this machine is what @ call 'the hum'. 9ne time, before @ soldered the components in place, @ had to re)hookup the parts because they had wiggled loose. 9nce @ had them connected back together and connected power !without a charging battery hooked up" @ noticed a fairly loud hum coming out of the coilB The coil wasn't heating up and the neither was the transistor, but it pushed the magnets of the rotor out of the way so that the coil was in the middle of two magnets. @nterestingB The hum stopped immediately as @ disconnected the battery. >fter @ connected power again, the hum started again. This time, @ tried to see if there was anything coming off the diode but the meter reading was inconclusive. trangest of all, when @ connected a battery to the charging position the hum stopped as well. $uriouser and curiouser... >fter @ disconnected the charge battery the hum didn't come back, but it did come back a while later. @t seems to be a bit capricious, this hum. @ did notice that it was much easier to get the rotor spinning up to speed when the coil was humming versus when it wasn't. @t seems these machines are full of surprises. >nd maybe @ didn't notice it before, but it seems that there's also a faint hum in the coil of the first machine that @ built as well. > 4uestion comes to mind about this circuit. @n the PP> in 2ree ?nergy Aeneration it's stressed that the radiant energy capture circuit has to be separated from the drive circuit, but in the circuit below, this is clearly not the case. >lso, @ have strong reason to believe that the circuit below works well !@ can elaborate if necessary ", although some changes in the resistor are probably needed for optimum operation. @t could be that @'m missing something obvious))after all, @'m still e6perimenting and learning this stuff first hand and trying to make sense of it all. >ttached @mages bedini)ssg)small.png !<H.G /', KML views"
Fast edited by Shamus Q "$71!7*""! at "*Q,, B(. >easonQ 2orget somethingEtypos...

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by E? 2 ermalin*5 0)61762007, 00:27 &hamus

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur 9hamus 9*

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

8ery $oolB

chematic looks good. 8ery nice bare bones ssg.

Those alkaline batts aren't the best but they can be charged at least a few times from my e6perience before having to throw them away. @'d recommend using some Ov andFor <=v gel cell batts...the black body type you can get at radio shack or elsewhere. Those are good to learn with. The hum you discovered is the circuit is self oscillating at high fre4uency. *ost likely this is what is happening. @f you have a scope on it, you will see something like this pic.

@ played with my roller skate motor for months before doing anything else. ,ot even trying to charge anything with it. 2ill learn a lot more if you 5ust get obsessed about the bare basic model first without doing anything else. @n my opinion.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E( 2 ermalin*5 0)62D62007, 01:20 *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

hamus
enior *ember

Preliminary results with big battery

T>aron7 Thanks for the clarification. @ think @'ve learned what @ need to from the 0 by itself))needless to say, there's probably more secrets in that thing than @'ve found so far. @t continues to surprise me, especially in light of how simple it appears. @'m sure you're probably aware of &ohn 'edini's sense of urgency in wanting people to learn the technology !as e6pressed in this message". @ have every reason to believe that he's right, and mostly from what @'ve been seeing from independent sources. The time is short. >nd @'m sure you'd agree that this isn't the place to discuss such things. >t any rate, @'ve started some preliminary load testing, and the data so far is encouraging. %nder the first load test, the battery took about LM minutes to discharge down to <=...8 !under a =M2 load running from a voltage inverter". $harging took about G. hours to get it up to <G.LO8 !have to retune the thing for a P %". Running another load test, the battery took about O. minutes to discharge down to <=...8 under the same load. o there's something very interesting going on here. @'ll post more details as testing progresses.

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by E' 2 ermalin*5 0)62D62007, 10:02 *hamus

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur conditioning batts

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Ii

hamus,

ounds like great progress. The capacity of your battery is growing as you condition them. Aou are literally changing the properties of the battery. hould grow in capacity and take less and less time to charge up to the same level. &ohn has known the urgency for years but it isn't until recent times that people are paying attention. 2ith gas prices going up and insane politics, people are starting to pay attention. The 'edini technology and water fuel cell technology are my two favorite ones to focus on.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron EE 2 ermalin*5 0)63062007, 00:1D *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

enior *ember

hamus

+atest results

2ell, @'m in round four of charging and things haven't been coming along as well as @ had hoped. @'m not going to stop here until @ see a solid trend, but the preliminaries thus far are not encouraging. That and the fact that it takes about G.)L. hours for one charge cycleB :oad times are staying fairly flat so far. Iere's the numbers so far7
$ode7

4har#e 5 -------328 0 2%848 40820

4h# 6"d V --------13.46 13.47 13.8%

&d 7t V ------12.8 13.34 13.36 13. 2

&oad 5 -----00844 008 7 00848 01803

This is a regular old Radio hack lead)acid battery, <=8FK>h. @'m discharging it into a GM.2 inverter and powering a =M2 bulb for load testing. @t's strange7 9nce it gets up to around <G.G.8 the charging seems to hit a wall))only gaining ...<8 per hour. ,ow @'ve read where &ohn 'edini says that the number of turns on the coil isn't important, nor its si#e. *aybe @'m getting some cross)conduction on my transistor !since it's =,G.MM, which &ohn considers 5unk"Q @ don't know how to check for that. &ohn also says that you want the highest resistance on the base so that you get the highest RP* for the lowest current. $urrently the RP* on my circuit is fairly high, and the base resistance is right around <<.. ohm. >nyway, @'ll post more results as they slooooowly come in. ,9TE7 The missing data in the graph around hours H)<. and <O)== are due to an outside obligation at the time and the need for sleep. >ttached @mages charge)cycle)L)partial.5pg !G<.O /', <M. views"
Fast edited by Shamus Q "$7,"7*""! at "%Q,+ B(. >easonQ (issing info... Q7B

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E17 2 ermalin*5 0)63162007, 0/:C3 &-

>aron
will speed up

piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Ii hamus, on these smaller systems, the charging will be much slower, but usually after many rounds of conditioning, the charging back up will get 4uicker and 4uicker. > M coil setup !L power < trigger" of about <- guage <.. feet long each is for more practical application but before doing that in my opinion...getting the whole personality of the motor you have down is very crucial, in my opinion.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E11 2 ermalin*5 0/61362007, 01:00 &-

amigo

&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K Posts7 K<.

enior *ember

>fter winding and rewinding several different coils, @ have built one that @ sort of like !for now". @ had previously built a 0 with a =OP=L >20 so @ used that as a base for a coil. 9n top of that @ wound trifilar =. >20 as power coil. The motor works ok @ suppose, what @'m wondering about is why do we need to tie all the multi)filar strands in the power coil together in parallel !for the circuit that does not have transistor per each coil"Q 2hen @ keep them parallel @ get about <..8 radiant spikes, but when @ tie them in series then @ get little over L..8. @sn't it better to have higher potentialQ >re we looking for less or more resistance in the power coilQ 2hat about the trigger coil, should that be on a higher resistanceQ >lso, the conclusion @ came to is that =,G.MM is a 5oke compared to *&:=<<HL and that even for beginning circuits everyone should use the later. There's 5ust a magnitude of 4uality difference between the two that cannot be ignored. *y motor 5ust purrrrs nicer with *&:=<<HL and can be fine tuned to a better degree than with =,G.MM.

,e6t @'m adding this $ap Pulse Timer circuit !link from 'ediniU 0 Aahoo group, @'d figure most of you are members there, noQ" , has anyone else built this one and has any e6periences to shareQ 9h forgot to add this. @ built this coil and it worked !sort of because @ did not wind to that si#e but smaller" but only if @ pointed it in reverse !power coils toward the rotor". @t was producing all kinds of strange sounds and would draw 4uite a current !<)=> sometimes". omehow @ could tune it down to L..m> and @'d get over G..8 radiant spikes as well. Funny thing is that @ have never seen my ,E)= bulb light up !dimly" when @ touch the collector of the transistor on other setups e6cept this one, and there was no primary or secondary batteries connected. @s this normal behaviour and does it happen for you or did @ stumble upon something une6pectedQ
Fast edited by amigo Q " 71,7*""! at "1Q1% #(. >easonQ added more te&t

amigo 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by amigo + onsored 4in*s

E16 2 ermalin*5 0/61362007, 12:2C *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

enior *ember

hamus

Iola >migo, 2hat is the difference between the =,G.MM and the *&:=<<HLQ @ know the characteristics of the other parts !the <,H<L is a fast switching diode, the <,L..K is a high powerFvoltage diode, etc" but when it comes to transistors @ don't know s4uat. 2hat are the characteristics that we're supposed to be looking for in this partQ Power rating is one, but @ have no idea what the others should be.

@f you don't know, maybe someone else who does can kindly inter5ect.

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E1< 2 ermalin*5 0/61362007, 0C:07 *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

enior *ember

hamus

EEE Holy 9mokes Batman EEE

ometimes things 5ust stare you in the face and you don't reali#e the implications until much later, when the connection finally manifests itself to you in a form so clear that you wonder why you didn't see it before. >ll of this arose because @ was thinking of Rick Freidrich and the struggles he's gone through trying to convince people of what they had with the 0. >nd the problem probably stemmed from the fact that most people don't have any understanding of conventional electronics theory))they 5ust built the things, connecting the parts as shown in the schematic, and didn't really think all that much about it. o in the midst of pondering this, all of the sudden it hit me like a ton of bricksB

Take a look at the picture and circled part. The way the diode is hooked up means that absolutely no current will flow at any time according to conventional E* theory. The positive from the charging battery is blocked by virtue of being connected to the cathode of the diode coming off of the power coilB o simpleB Aet so diabolically cleverB The way that diode sits in the circuit !again, according to conventional theory" means that it's basically an open short))you could remove the diode and battery completely because

they have absolutely no path where a current can flow through themB

>fter going through several chargeFdischarge cycles, you have to wonder 5ust what is charging the batteryQ '$ause it sure ain't electronsB >ttached @mages bedini)ssg)highlighted.5pg !G-.L /', MH- views"
Fast edited by Shamus Q " 71,7*""! at "IQ*, B(. >easonQ grammar, grmbl R9

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E1; 2 ermalin*5 0/61362007, 07:10 *-

Ted Ewert
enior *ember

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 F 'ay >rea Posts7 MO=

Ii hamus, That diode does indeed pass current !and the more the betterB 7)". Think of it as a compression diode. 2hen the transistor first turns on, the current from the battery is temporarily attenuated by the coil. $urrent will not flow until the magnetic field is built up around the coil. $onse4uently, when the transistor turns off, that field collapses and produces a high positive voltage right where the cathode of that diode is. @f this voltage is not bled off, it will increase on subse4uent cycles and blow up your transistor in many cases. @t is this energy that is e6tracted buy the interaction of the magnet, coil and pulses that charges the battery so well. 8oltage alone won't charge these batteries. They need a combination of high voltage and low impedance in short duration pulses. ,ote on batteries7 'atteries take a while to become conditioned. ?on't get discouraged if they don't work so great even through the first <. or even =. cycles. @t usually doesn't take that long, but there are different types of batteries, si#es and chargers that make this an ine6act science at best. ,one of the 'edini machines work that well on unconditioned batteries. That's one of the reasons @ think people get discouraged. @t also takes a while to get used to how the machines work.

The 0 is an awesome machine for learning about this technology. The more you fool around with it and e6periment, the more you will learn. @t is a very simple machine electrically, but it embodies all the concepts 'edini has worked so many years to discover. @t's all there for those who are patient and persistent. @t 5ust takes a while to learn. Ted

Ted Ewert 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by Ted Ewert E1H 2 ermalin*5 0/61062007, 12:1C &&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K :ocation7 chicago Posts7 G.L

adam ant
enior *ember

has anyone ever tried to use >$ on a bedini sgQ the reason i ask is that i wonder if you could use the wall current, and return it back to another outlet and reverse the Electric *eter outside. you would in a sense be (recharging( the electric company. in most states !in the % " they will pay you for power generated and sent to them. this would eliminate the need for =. ) G. car batteries, no6ious fumes, you could eliminate your electric bill, and possibly make some e6tra money on top of it. is this possibleQ )bryan

adam ant 8iew Public Profile 8isit adam ant's homepageB

Find all posts by adam ant E1? 2 ermalin*5 0/61062007, 01:20 &-

amigo
enior *ember

&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K Posts7 K<.

@n one of my e6periments !now it escapes my mind whether @ had that (weird( coil or was it a normal one hooked up ) should start keeping lab notes, sigh" @ used my ?$ power supply set to <=8 as a primary. @ left the motor spinning and walk away from the desk for a bit. $ame back and 5ust looked around the desk then ga#ed up at the voltage indicator on the psu and it showed <O or so volts. @ was thinking what a ... so @ unplug the motor and lo and behold the voltage went back to <=8. @t would appear that the motor was feeding back some potentialFenergy back into the psu, while at the same time charging the secondary battery and spinning pretty fast. orry it's not directly >$ related but @ figured it might be relevant...

amigo 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by amigo E1( 2 ermalin*5 0/61062007, 01:C) &&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K :ocation7 chicago Posts7 G.L

adam ant
enior *ember

i wouldnt be comfortable trying the >$ e6periment myself, as my electrical knowledge is old and rusty. i would be a bit nervous about doing ma5or damage, shocking myself, or who knows what else. i figured someone would have tried it by now, or at least thought about it.

adam ant 8iew Public Profile 8isit adam ant's homepageB Find all posts by adam ant E1' 2 ermalin*5 0/61062007, 0D:2) &&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K Posts7 <,H.=

/evin
Energetic cience Practitioner .harging batteries

>dam, ince it is a cold charge there are no fumes generated when charging the batteries with the 0 charger....batteries never get even warm. >aron, correct me if @ am wrong....but @ believe the voltage spikes going into the battery are >$, not ?$. !the neon light that lights up when it is running is a <=.v ac light" Aes, hamus, !/evin hangs his head in shame) " @ am one of those guys that took the schematic, some e6planation from >aron, and some TR8 data and 5ust built it. ?id not concentrate too much on how it worked...only as much as @ need to in order to get the most usable energy for the energy spent.

9e"in

8iew Public Profile 8isit /evin's homepageB Find all posts by /evin E1E 2 ermalin*5 0/61062007, 12:1C *-

amigo
enior *ember

&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K Posts7 K<.

/evin, @ think that the spikes are ?$ !basically P2*" ) they are half)wave, rectified by the diode on the collector, noQ The ,E is before the diode thus it lights up only on >$. omeone please correct me if @'m wrong

amigo 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by amigo E67 2 ermalin*5 0/61062007, 00:3/ *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

hamus
enior *ember

T/evin7 @ was speaking mainly of the people on the 'ediniU 0 list who were demanding overunity from the machine without really comprehending what was right in front of their eyes, and Rick's frustration with said people. >t any rate, @'m 5ust trying to figure out this stuff too since something seems to be very wrong with my setup. @'m in round <L of load testing and the load times have been dropping about a <F= hour each time.

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E61 2 ermalin*5 0/61062007, 0/:0) *-

Ted Ewert
enior *ember

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 F 'ay >rea Posts7 MO=

@t's pulsed ?$. The F2'R 5ust gets it going in the right direction. ,eons don't care and will light on anything at their rated voltage.

Ted Ewert 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by Ted Ewert + onsored 4in*s

E66 2 ermalin*5 0/61C62007, 0):C1 &-

piritual Entrepreneur sg and free spinning wheel

>aron

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Iey /evin, ?itto to Ted's answer.

>lso, another thing to throw into the mi6 hamus is that when the circuit is in resonance !you can usually hear and see the wheel speed up really 4uick like shifting gears", it is fast enough at that point that the (scalar south( between the north faces on magnets are >TTR>$TE? to the ,9RTI field on the coil pulse. >t that time, the wheel is spinning for FREEB That is a good one to meditate on. The sg seems to only take power because there is back emf on the on pulse for a small blip of time and that is it. 'efore the circuit is in resonance !with rotor", it takes more power to charge an electromagnetic coil against a magnet with an opposing field. 'ut a south field in between the norths actually helps pull that north field out of the coil easierB This is how @ see it at least but no matter how it is seen, the wheel spins for free has it's own loss but that isn't what powers the wheel. and the charging of the coil

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E6< 2 ermalin*5 0/61C62007, 01:03 *&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K :ocation7 chicago Posts7 G.L

adam ant
enior *ember

thank you for the e6planation, but that brings me back to my original 4uestion has anyone ever tried to use wall >$ current on the 'edini 0!battery charger version", and if it was possible to use this setup to send the power back to the electric company.

adam ant

8iew Public Profile 8isit adam ant's homepageB Find all posts by adam ant E6; 2 ermalin*5 0/61D62007, 0):31 *&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K Posts7 <,H.=

/evin

Energetic

cience Practitioner

Thank youE

Thank you Ted and >aron. >s you know >aron, once @ got the thing functional with two circuits and started having a $9P of <...P @ 5ust concentrated on tuning itFe6perimenting to get the best $9P @ could. hamus, >aron or Ted or Q, may correct me, but if @ recall @ did ,9T start seeing any significant $9P of <P until >FTER my batteries were conditioned. This takes about =.)G. chargeFdischarge cycles. >nother thing...@ am sure it is because my wheel is not perfectly balanced, and because they are cheap bicycle bearings, but @ found that the best RP* for my setup is between =HM and G... @ can get the RP* up to H..P, but when @ do that the ratio of energy e6pended to energy captured in the charging batteries is not as beneficial $9P wise. 9f course, every setup is different. There are so many factors in tuning the charger)here is a list of 5ust a few of the variables that @ constantly played with7 Resistance RP* ?istance of magnets on wheel from coil

*aking sure all the wires from the coil to the different connections were the same length and as straight as possible. E6perimenting with different gauge wire leading to the charging battery 0etting the voltage spikes as clean as possible on the oscilloscope There is more, but those are the biggies that @ can remember right now.

>dam, regarding plugging into >$...that seems like oil and water to me...>aron can correct me if @ am wrong, but the energy (captured( by the 0 is not able to be measured in a typical manner and is specifically usable by batteries. 9h hamus, btw, @ started out using the little gel cell <= volt batteries from Radio hack...everything worked fine on those, but @ soon changed to full si#e deep cycle <= volt batteries for the ma5ority of my testing.

9e"in 8iew Public Profile 8isit /evin's homepageB Find all posts by /evin E6H 2 ermalin*5 0/61D62007, 0/:11 *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

hamus
enior *ember

TadamUant7 :ike /evin said, it probably won't work without doing something to transduce the hole current to an electron current. >t any rate, it's certainly possible and people with solar and other more conventional overunity !err, $9P V <.." systems sell e6cess power to

the Electric $ompany all the time. @f you do follow that course of action, you would do well to have a fake solar array somewhere 5ust in case the Electric $o. comes snooping around. Aou don't want to mess with those guys. T/evin7 @s what @ have a gel cellQ >nd how did you source your deep cell batteriesQ @ do know that you can get them on the cheap if they're not new !and of course, that would be preferable", @ 5ust don't know where to get 'em. >ttached @mages battery closeup.5pg !HH.G /', <L. views"

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E6? 2 ermalin*5 0/61762007, 03:2C *-

amigo

&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K Posts7 K<.

enior *ember

hamus, that's a gel)cell. @ got mine from a surplus store though it's not K>h like yours but only =.G>h, for J<.HM each can't go wrong. Plus the battery seems brand new, plastic case looks pretty clean with 5ust minor scrathes and the two connectors do not appear to have been used what so ever. ,aturally @ bought half a do#en...

amigo 8iew Public Profile

Find all posts by amigo E6( 2 ermalin*5 0/61762007, 10:2C *&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K :ocation7 %r)th Posts7 GML

enior *ember

hamus

>h, heck, that's what @ was afraid of... @'ve been loading it down to <=...8 for each load cycle, which is a sure path to damage. 9h well, live and learn.

+hamus 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by hamus

E6' 2 ermalin*5 0/61762007, 11:30 *&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K Posts7 <,H.=

/evin
Energetic cience Practitioner

*ost of my batteries are generic 2almart deep cycle andFor *arine batteries. @ do have a couple car batteries that (died( and were discarded because they would not take a charge from a traditional battery charger. >fter a couple do#en cycles on the 0 they work like newB

9e"in

8iew Public Profile 8isit /evin's homepageB Find all posts by /evin E6E 2 ermalin*5 0/61)62007, 02:CD *&oin ?ate7 Posts7 = ep =..K

gehko

&unior *ember

". 9chematic ;uote7

9riginally Posted by adam ant thank you for the e&planation, but that brings me back to my original -uestion has anyone ever tried to use wall #4 current on the 3edini SA8battery charger version9, and if it was possible to use this setup to send the power back to the electric company. @ did some fiddling with the >$ idea and hamus's circuit and came up with this circuit. @t seems to give off a similar spike, but instead of using the 'edini magnet wheel it uses the ac fre4uency. >t the bottom you can see the <H.K k8 spikes, and the 9%T is where you would put the charge battery. @ dont know how efficient it is, i 5ust thought i would try the idea on (paper(. @ havent built it in real life. >ttached @mages acUcircuit.&P0 !=-.- /', =K. views"

geh*o 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by gehko E<7 2 ermalin*5 0/61)62007, 10:00 *-

amigo

&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K Posts7 K<.

enior *ember

@'m not sure that simulation software can give us a real picture of the outcome. @ thought that we are dealing here with (unwanted by)products( that most traditional engineers consider as noise and interference and want to surpress and filter out. oftware would most likely ignore it or discard it due to being based on convenitonal methods and beliefs, tooQ Tadam ant 2hat did you mean when you said to use wall >$ currentQ %se it as a primary battery replacement, without any conversion to ?$ or 5ust as a triggerQ

Bedini .apacitive Bischarge .hargers

'edini $ap $harger discussion. The chargers with with bridge to cap setup. $an be with mechanical pulley switch setup, MMM timer switch, neon bulb switch, etc... 2ith rotor or self)oscillating.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron + onsored 4in*s

E6 2 ermalin*5 0C60C62007, 03:17 *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 G--

lighty

enior *ember

@ always wondered why did 'edini put thyristor in the (negative( branch of the discharge circuitQ @t seems to me as if it's all the same if one puts the $R's anode directly to the positive end of the capacitor and then use it to discharge the cap into the battery or if one puts cathode of the $R to the negative terminal of the cap and then discharge the cap into the battery. 2hat's the differenceQ @ mean, @'ve found some very vague e6planation in 'edini's latest patent about polari#ation of the $R being related to the type of energy used in the circuit but to me it seems as if the $R is simply the one way fast switch that's being used to close the circuit !or to be more precise to discharge the capacitor to the battery" so it shouldn't matter if one connect thyristor either way as long as the proper polarity is observedQ $ould somebody e6plain the rationale behind the kind of configuration used by 'edini in his patentQ
Fast edited by lighty Q "+7"!7*""! at 1*Q,* B(. >easonQ Typing error correction

light! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by lighty E< 2 ermalin*5 0C60C62007, 0C:3/ *-

>aron
cap polarity

piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

@f you simply mean why is it triggered on the negative of cap to negative of battery... @f the positive is connected but the negative is not, that means that the positive potential from the cap is >:RE>?A sitting inside of the battery being charged. >s soon as the negative side is connected, you have the negative charge popping towards the battery and the charging effect is stronger. @t does make a difference. @f the neg is connected, the neg potential is sitting in the battery and when triggered on the positive, then the positive still has to make its way through the battery. The other way, the pos is already in the battery. &ohn or Peter can of course e6plain this better but @ thought Free Energy 0eneration book did a good 5ob at e6plaining it. 2hen the neg is discharged, the battery itself @ suppose is a resistor and since it is, the anti)

photon potential around the circuit is sucked towards the battery at this point of resistance. 2hen the positive of cap is connected to the pos of the batt, look at the battery at simply being an e6tension of the dipole. :ook at the coil in the simple school girl, the P of battery is >:RE>?A sitting inside of the coil and the coil is already an e6tension of the dipole of the input battery. 'eing an e6tension of the dipole on the positive side, the positive doesn't have to take the time to overcome the resistance of moving into the coil or moving into a battery.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E; 2 ermalin*5 0C60C62007, 07:27 *-

Peter :indemann
enior *ember )or what its worth... ;uote7

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 :iberty :ake, 2ashington Posts7 HOK

9riginally Posted by lighty I always wondered why did 3edini put thyristor in the /negative/ branch of the discharge circuit@ It seems to me as if it.s all the same if one puts the S4>.s anode directly to the positive end of the capacitor and then use it to discharge the cap into the battery or if one puts cathode of the S4> to the negative terminal of the cap and then discharge the cap into the battery. What.s the difference@ I mean, I.ve found some very vague e&planation in 3edini.s latest patent about polariLation of the S4> being related to the type of energy used in the circuit but to me it seems as if the S4> is simply the one way fast switch that.s being used to close the circuit 8or to be more precise to discharge the capacitor to the battery9 so it shouldn.t matter if one connect thyristor either way as long as the proper polarity is observed@ 4ould somebody e&plain the rationale behind the kind of configuration used by 3edini in his patent@

?ear :ighty, >s >aron 5ust e6plained, &ohn has looked at switching both the negative and the positive sides and studied the situation in depth. From a theoretical point of view, there doesn't seem to be any reason for a difference. 'ut on the bench, in the real world, there are differences. &ohn has his own way of e6plaining it, and that's in the book (Free Energy 0eneration(. Iere is my way of seeing it. @n a lead)acid battery, all of the action is on the positive plate. 2hen discharging, the lead pero6ide of the positive plate is donating o6ygen atoms to 5oin with hydrogen from the I= 9L in the electrolyte to be converted to new water molecules and free sulfate ions that deposit on both the positive and negative plates. 2hen charging, this process is reversed, but the action is always on the positive plate. 2hen you try to charge the battery from the negative plate with a big push of negative electrons, the charge has to travel through the electrolyte to get to the positive plate where the reformation of the lead pero6ide @ the restoration of the chemical charge. 2hen the positive plate is potentiali#ed, the battery charges differently, at lower temperatures and with less off)gassing. These things can not be figured out simply by TI@,/@,0 >'9%T @T. Aou have to run the e6periments if you want to learn anything. >nd that's the difference. &ohn has run every conceivable e6periment in this regard, and that's why he knows more than the rest of usB @ hope that helps. Peter

-eter 4indemann 8iew Public Profile 8isit Peter :indemann's homepageB Find all posts by Peter :indemann EH 2 ermalin*5 0C60C62007, 11:0C *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 G--

lighty
enior *ember

T>aron TPeter

Th6 for the e6planation. ,ow @ seem to understand a principle behind it a bit better than before. @ did a number of e6periments but to be honest @ didn't see any difference between these two configurations. @ trust 'edini's e6perience but @ also trust in understanding underlying principles rather than simply replicating them. >lso regarding the positive and negative poles of :ead)>cid batteries @ cannot but to remember what :eedskalnin described in his e6periments and that @ replicated and verified. Ie stated that there is always a larger number of (north pole magnetic particles( in the battery and that they're all sourced from the !P" pole of the battery. @ did replicate his P*I and did a number of precision measurements. 2hat @'ve found is that :eedskalnin was correct in his assertions) no matter what you do with the P*I core, no matter how you polari#e coils there will always be a disbalance of magnetic poles in the P*I. The ,orth will always be geometrically predominant in the P*I and it will always be somewhat stronger. @ repeated the e6periment several times using professional gaussmeter and it always showed the same. 9ne half of P*I is always spatially bigger than the other one and it's always the north pole. o if a north pole is produced by the tiny magnetic particles from the !P" pole of the battery then :eedskalnin was correct in assuming there is more north pole magnets or rather !P" pole particles in the battery. @'m getting way offtopic here but it 5ust strike me as oddly connected to your e6planation.
Fast edited by lighty Q "+7"+7*""! at 11Q++ B(.

light! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by lighty E? 2 ermalin*5 0C60D62007, 07:00 &-

>aron

piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

pulsing on neg better results

That's an interesting comparision. *y personal e6perience with the trifilar oscillator going to caps and to batts discharging on the negative side took my results 4uite a bit further. @ could get the batt voltages higher, they powered a load longer, etc... *y trifiliar really isn't a trifilar with all G wound the same way. the Grd wire going to bridge and cap is wound in the opposite direction from the power and trigger. >nyway, pulsing from neg gave me better results.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E( 2 ermalin*5 0C60D62007, 11:33 &&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 G--

lighty
enior *ember

T>aron Aour (secondary( is wound in the opposite direction than the power coilQ 2hat would that gain youQ >ccording to conventional theory you would 5ust end up with the opposite polarity of the coil. To be honest @ never tried it and maybe there something more about it that @ don't know anything aboutQ >lso, regarding the coils wound 'edini style @'ve noticed several things7 <. The mass of the copper wire is pretty much the same weight in the power and (secondary( sections. @t seems to me that it goes according to Tesla's assertion that in order to transfer andFor gain some amount of radiant energy in any kind of resonant system one has to have the e4ual mass of conductive metal in primary and (secondary(. =. The bifilar or trifilar winding of coils should theoretically provide coils with the best capacitive coupling between them. ,ow, if we disregard the inductive !or to be more precise magnetic coupling" then what one is left with is capacitive coupling !which is related directly to dielectric field". ,ow, my guess is that with better capacitive coupling a better dielectric field between two coils is formed and thus one should get a better transfer of radiant energy. @'m wildly speculating here, of course. G. The :it# wire has the less resistance to the fast transients or in this particular case the sudden impulses. @t also shows less impedance at high fre4uencies which is precisely what one should e6pect from the e6treme high fre4uencies radiant energy event. *y guess is that all those factors e6plains for the greater amount or radiant energy produced !or rather captured" by these sort of wire. @ did several measurements of the three different kind of coils) the one wound with ordinary round wire, the one wound with copper strip and the one wound with :it# wire. They were all used in the same switching setup, wound on the same type of core and they all had pretty much the same resistance and inductance !@

dimensioned wire si#es accordingly". The :it# wire and copper strip showed pretty much similar radiant energy gain but the ordinary round profile wire coil showed a significantly weaker performance. o, the geometry and construction of the wire itself does make a difference. @ also managed to ac4uire some aluminium wire but still haven't had opportunity to test it. *y guess is that aluminium wire should outperform copper wire in the sense that aluminium itself proved itself to be a better medium for collecting static electricity !which is by nature damn near the dielectricity".

There is also one more thing that's bothering me regarding a usage of the diode bridge on the (secondary( coil. @f you have measured power coil consumption with a current probe on a fast oscilloscope you could have noticed that the moment the power coil is turned on, the power consumption suddenly rises significantly while at the same time the discharge capacitor potential suddenly rises. That to me would indicate some kind of (transformer effect(. @ also did simultaneous measurement of the both power coil current and the (secondary( coil current and invariably when the capacitor is fully discharged !or rather when it has potential less than the potential of the power source being applied to the power coil" there is a noticeable current rise in the power coil as well as in the (secondary( coil prior to the power coil current cut)off and before the first radiant event occur. *y interpretation of it is that prior to the first impulse of radiant energy the capacitor is being charged to the voltage level of the power source solely by the inductive coupling of the coils or rather by (transformer effect(. @t's easily preventable by simply using one diode instead of a diode bridge so that the inductive coupling of the coils doesn't play such a big role. @ tested it and it indeed shows that a current consumption during the first pulse is reduced significantly and that the capacitor is almost not being charged prior to the occurence of the first radiant energy event. ,ow, my 4uestion is what is the rationale behind using the diode bridge in the first placeQ @ mean there is a definite (ringing( of the potential of the (secondary( coil while it's energy being discharged into the capacitor that could be picked up by the diode bridge but is that the only reason for using the diode bridge in the first placeQ @ mean it seems to me that it's simply the choice between picking up all of the energy available !diode bridge" and reducing the (transformer effect( !single diode".

light! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by lighty E' 2 ermalin*5 0C60762007, 11:0C &-

&oin ?ate7 *ay =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 H

had
&unior *ember

$uestion F Peter

Ii Peter @ 5ust 5oined the group ) looks like something good among all the groups hortly ago @ studied your lectures carefully which were really inspiring and made me thinkingB Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge with usB @ often wondered how 'edini charges his batteries ) in my eyes he is the master of radiant energy. @ don't understand much of the electronics but rather the physics behind it and am convinced that with his energy spikesFback)emf he causes a radiant event in his battery, which causes the battery to recharge. Iow he causes this radiant event, is his secret, but it surely is not enough to shoot back)emf into the battery... >ctually, batteries aren't really charged, that is some kind of wrong understanding. 2hat is really happening there is that a kind of electro plating occurs while a battery is charged with current. @n his process 'edini causes an avalanche effect of radiant energy in the batteries, similar effects were reported in Tesla's works. Iowever, a battery is no capacitor that stores energy, but there rather occurs an electro)chemical process, which might be mis)interpreted by electro)techni4ues. @f two different kind of metals are put into an electrolyte, the electrodes will generate ions, or in better words, dielectric charges. @f we short out the electrodes and the current starts flowing, electro plating occurs whereby the electrodes start dissolving and e6change each other. @f one charges batteries, a vice versa process is done ) and once the electrodes have recovered, we use to say the batteries are charged, because they give power again. Peter, @ have a 4uestion to you ) what do you think would be happen if we took the ionsFdielectric charges in some 'indirect way' away from the battery, without using and destroying the producing electrodesQ @magine in the same electrolyte you would have two neutral electrodes, made from the same material, like non)magnetic stainless steel. 2e need the same material in both electrodes because in this way we do not produce any ionsFdielectric charges. @f now these two electrodes would be shortened out in pulses, they would have to polari#e and some current would flow through them. @n this way it would be possible in some indirect way to tap electricity from the battery, without destroying the electrodes that produce the ions and electricity.

'ut what would be used here was the water, as every time electricity comes across the electrodes an electrolysis would occur. Then water would have to be refilled, whereby the electrolyte is not being used up. @n my eyes the greatest problem is that we use batteries in a wrong way and that we have a wrong understanding of electricity. 2e always destroy the electricity source ) if we had a way of taking it in an indirect way, we would have plenty free electricity and hydrogen from a so)called electrochemical process. 2hat do you thinkQ 9r am @ too creativeQ 2ell, my English sometimes sounds weird, but @ hope @ made my point clear... 'est wishes, had

+had 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by EE 2 ermalin*5 0C60762007, 12:2) *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 G-had

lighty
enior *ember

T had @'m not sure you even need electrolyte. @ distinctly remember that somebody reported a partial charging of :ead)>cid battery even when I= 9L was replaced with distilled !or rather de)ioni#ed water". @ think the person reporting it was 'edini himself or 'earden. 2hile @ cannot verify that claim as such @ can confirm that a small charge can indeed be stored in a de)minerali#ed and de)ioni#ed water !like in a battery" when a water is e6cited !or rather shocked" in a specific way even when not using a different material electrodes. 2hich of course brings us to a 4uestion of dielectric charge itself and water is specific matter in that way. chauberger reported a charging of water when a water was forced !or in this case it would be more appropriate to say coerced" to move in the fast centripetal motion. > reported charging of the surrounding metals was a common place and @'m not talking about

the (/elvin's water drop( e6periment but rather about very powerful dielectric phenomena on the scale being able to power up incandescent lightbulbs or even burn them up. ?ielectricity is a rather funny thing, ehQ

light! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by lighty E17 2 ermalin*5 0C60762007, 0C:00 *&oin ?ate7 *ay =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 H &unior *ember

had

Ii :ighty, W
;uote7

9riginally Posted by lighty SShad TI.m not sure you even need electrolyte. I distinctly remember that somebody Treported a partial charging of Fead7#cid battery even when 5*S)% was Treplaced with distilled 8or rather de7ioniLed water9. I think the person Treporting it was 3edini himself or 3earden. *y personal opinion is that the battery together with its electrodes, electrolyte is not the source of energy, but merely the medium. uch as the atmosphere on our planet or the globe itself X this also merely is a medium for aether or vacuum energy, in which energy can materiali#e and manifest. @f you put the right media together a lot of energy can, for free, accrue. > nice e6ample here is e6otic matter, such as mono)atomic gold, also called 9R*% , which you can find googling. This material seems to be a great mystery for science, but one scientific fact is that it is very closely connected to gravity and #ero point energy. The laws of thermo)dynamics here do not seem to have any influence on this e6otic matter. 'ack to the battery7 @ think that the biggest problem is that while taping power from it the electrodes are degenerated by the electro)plating effect, whereby electricity has to be

invested to again regenerate them. 'ut what will happen if besides the Cnormal+ electrodes, one additionally inserts neutral electrodes that do not produce any charges, but would be able to tap the surrounding charges in the electrolyte of the batteryQ The electrodes that generate the charges would thereby not degenerate, because there is no electro)plating. @f we tap electricity directly from the electrode that generates the charge, we do destroy the source of energy. The battery generates the charge for free by the right combination of materials. Iowever, we destroy this process with the electro)plating effect which occurs when electricity runs through the electrodes. @f two electrodes of same materials are put into the electrolyte such as non)magnetic stainless steel, these electrodes will not generate any charge, but are able to absorb the charge. The electrodes hereby do not decay by electro)plating, but every time they would be shortened out hydrogen would be generated, as electricity would flow through the electrodes. This one should be no problem, as long as water is for free available, the electrolyte either wouldn+t be used up, from time to time it would need to be refilled and the original electrodes that generate the charge remain intact, without degenerating.
;uote7

9riginally Posted by lighty U While I cannot verify that claim as such I can confirm that a small charge can indeed be U stored in a de7mineraliLed and de7ioniLed water 8like in a battery9 when a water is U e&cited 8or rather shocked9 in a specific way even when not using a different material U electrodes. *aybe @ am wrong ) but @ think the same would happen, such as in ordinary charging, if a radiant event occurs in the battery. This means the electrodes recover. The problem merely would be that if there was no electrolyte be present, after recovering the electrodes very little electricity would be generated, as the electrolyte as the medium, is missing. The recovery of the electrodes can also happen without electrolyte, as for this merely is the bombardment of radiant spikes is needed. 'ut @ could be wrongY @ guess &ohn 'edini is the only one that could say what is right or wrong, as he is the inventor of such battery charging system with radiant energy.
;uote7

9riginally Posted by lighty U Which of course brings us to a -uestion of dielectric charge itself and water is specific Umatter in that way. Schauberger reported a charging of water when a water was forced U 8or in this case it would be more appropriate to say coerced9 to move in the fast U centripetal motion. # reported charging of the surrounding metals was a common place U and I.m not talking about the /Gelvin.s water drop/ e&periment but rather about very U powerful dielectric phenomena on the scale being able to power up incandescent U lightbulbs or even burn them up.

U Dielectricity is a rather funny thing, eh@ Aou are absolutely right here X chauberger in his way charged water for healing purposes. Ie was even able to make water)diesel with fluid dynamics. The water was that much charged with dielectricity that it combusted better than diesel, gasoline or kerosene, even better than hydrogenFo6ygen from electrolysis. The made real detailed measurements and report on this work during 22@@. o, if we understood dielectricity better, we could make a handful of miracles Thanks to pioneers like Tesla, /eely, chauberger, today+s people like Tom 'earden, &ohn 'edini, Edwin 0ray, and those who share their knowledge here, as ?r. Peter :indemann it is much more easy for us to understand as they have done the spadeworkB @f they would not have done it, today we would be 4uiet ignorant about radiant energy, #pe, or however we might want to call it. 'est regards, had
Fast edited by Shad Q "+7"!7*""! at "+Q"$ B(.

+had 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by had

E11 2 ermalin*5 0C60762007, 0D:3) *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 G--

lighty
enior *ember ;uote7

9riginally Posted by 9had # nice e&ample here is e&otic matter, such as mono7atomic gold, also called )>(;S, which you can find googling. This material seems to be a great mystery for science, but one scientific fact is that it is very closely connected to gravity and Lero point energy. The laws of thermo7dynamics here do not seem to have any influence on this e&otic matter. @t's interesting that all of the (electrical healing systems( employ one or other kind of

dielectricity. @ did a lot of work with Rife system and @ also did some small amount of work on :akhovsky system. The common thing is that when you remove the magnetic component of the radiation what's left is a dielectric field which seems to have potent healing potential. The same thing happens with the chauberger (energi#ed( water. The more interesting aspect is the e6periment done by ' RF !or at least @'ve read about it in one of their 5ournals" regarding a plant growth in the complete darkness. The system used was pretty much similar to the Tesla patent on the radiant energy but the plants were kept between the plates of what was basically the capacitor. @ personally witnessed operation of basically similar system of healing with dielectric field in Russia and let me tell you it heals a lot of ailments usually deemed as un)curable. They also employ a system where a sudden and short high potential spikes !in potential range of G)L k8" of e6treme short durations are applied directly through body. That device also has a tremendous healing potential and it something to think about when considering electric healing systems like Iulda $lark's where a s4uare wave output is applied directly to body tissues) well, if such small impulses and negligible back)E*F generated are able to help healing then imagine what a Russian system might do. 9f course there is always more to that then it's being told as my hosts made sure @ was aware of.

;uote7

'ut what will happen if besides the Cnormal+ electrodes, one additionally inserts neutral electrodes that do not produce any charges, but would be able to tap the surrounding charges in the electrolyte of the batteryQ The electrodes that generate the charges would thereby not degenerate, because there is no electro)plating. @ think that in this case you would basically get something that Frolov calls (an information providing(. @t means that you only have to provide some open loop system with the information that the energy is available in order to get the system to react !or at least that's how @ understand it". The other way of putting is that you only need to provide the potential and then not allow the system to destroy or rather discharge that potential directly. 'earden says something along that line also although with different terminology. @t's pretty much similar to the voltage appearing between the electrodes of the asymetrical capacitor placed between two magnetic monopole beamers like used by 'ushman. There is no direct magnetic induction involved but rather an indirect potential appearance caused by the dielectric field appearing in between interacting magnetic monopoles.

;uote7

The recovery of the electrodes can also happen without electrolyte, as for this merely is the bombardment of radiant spikes is needed. 'ut @ could be wrongY @ guess &ohn 'edini is the only one that could say what is right or wrong, as he is the inventor of such battery charging system with radiant energy. >s @ said earlier) 'edini himself mentioned this effect in one of the references of his book. @ take down my hat to 'edini, he really is one of the great ones. 9r at least one of the ones we've heard of.

;uote7

The water was that much charged with dielectricity that it combusted better than diesel, gasoline or kerosene, even better than hydrogenFo6ygen from electrolysis. The further step would be the combustion of air itself and if @ recall correctly there is a Russian patent issued on that matter. The team from Russia supposedly succeeded in producing a (carburetor( system that allowed air to get to the point of self)combustion. >lthough @ don't have any further info on that one @ suspect that they simply oversaturated atmospheric air !rich with ,itrogen" with dielectric charge to the point where it started to combust on it's own. @ remember Tesla saying that combustion of matter or gases is nothing more than a release of electrostatic energy from the matter. @n fact with some of his coils he demonstrated discharges that produced what appeared to be white flames of e6treme temperatures. @n fact &eff 'ehary reproduced one of his coils and got the same results.
;uote7

o, if we understood dielectricity better, we could make a handful of miracles @ndeed.

;uote7

Thanks to pioneers like Tesla, /eely, chauberger, today+s people like Tom 'earden, &ohn 'edini, Edwin 0ray, and those who share their knowledge here, as ?r. Peter :indemann it is much more easy for us to understand as they have done the spadeworkB 'ediniF'earden duo is indeed something to be reckon with and Peter :indemann is the guy who is e6tremely good in populari#ing stuff that is otherwise somewhat hard to grasp.

Fast edited by lighty Q "+7"!7*""! at "$Q"" B(.

light! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by lighty

+ onsored 4in*s

E16 2 ermalin*5 0C60762007, 07:3D *-

Peter :indemann
enior *ember "nswer to 9had from Peter ;uote7

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 :iberty :ake, 2ashington Posts7 HOK

9riginally Posted by 9had 5i Beter I 1ust 1oined the group 7 looks like something good among all the groups Shortly ago I studied your lectures carefully which were really inspiring and made me thinkingC Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge with usC I often wondered how 3edini charges his batteries 7 in my eyes he is the master of radiant energy. I don.t understand much of the electronics but rather the physics behind it and am convinced that with his energy spikesEback7emf he causes a radiant event in his battery, which causes the battery to recharge. 5ow he causes this radiant event, is his secret, but it surely is not enough to shoot back7emf into the battery... #ctually, batteries aren.t really charged, that is some kind of wrong understanding. What is really happening there is that a kind of electro plating occurs while a battery is charged with current. In his process 3edini causes an avalanche effect of radiant energy in the batteries, similar effects were reported in Tesla.s works. 5owever, a battery is no capacitor that stores energy, but there rather occurs an electro7chemical process, which might be mis7interpreted by electro7techni-ues. If two different kind of metals are put into an electrolyte, the electrodes will generate ions, or in better words, dielectric charges. If we short out the electrodes and the current starts flowing, electro plating occurs whereby the electrodes start dissolving and e&change each other. If one charges batteries, a vice versa process is done 7 and once the electrodes have recovered, we use to say the batteries are charged, because they give power again. Beter, I have a -uestion to you 7 what do you think would be happen if we took the ionsEdielectric charges in some .indirect way. away from the battery, without using and destroying the producing electrodes@

Imagine in the same electrolyte you would have two neutral electrodes, made from the same material, like non7magnetic stainless steel. We need the same material in both electrodes because in this way we do not produce any ionsEdielectric charges. If now these two electrodes would be shortened out in pulses, they would have to polariLe and some current would flow through them. In this way it would be possible in some indirect way to tap electricity from the battery, without destroying the electrodes that produce the ions and electricity. 3ut what would be used here was the water, as every time electricity comes across the electrodes an electrolysis would occur. Then water would have to be refilled, whereby the electrolyte is not being used up. In my eyes the greatest problem is that we use batteries in a wrong way and that we have a wrong understanding of electricity. We always destroy the electricity source 7 if we had a way of taking it in an indirect way, we would have plenty free electricity and hydrogen from a so7called electrochemical process. What do you think@ )r am I too creative@ Well, my ?nglish sometimes sounds weird, but I hope I made my point clear... 3est wishes, Shad Ii had,

Aour speculations here are generally correctB @t is possible to make a cell with different metals that produces electricity with ,9 chemical changes occurring on the plates. uch a device is, technically, ,9T a battery, but such things ?9 e6ist. They are the best proof that RE>: electricity is ,9T the movement of electrons. :ead)acid batteries do re4uire some electron flow to function properly and &ohn's chargers produce the right mi6 of Radiant Energy and electron flow to optimi#e the battery process. @ have witnessed a number of circuits that &ohn has produced that blocked HHS of the electron flow. The output of these circuits can light light bulbs and when applied to a battery, it looks like the battery is charging, at first. 'ut very shortly thereafter, the battery blocks up and stops working. @n small gel)cell batteries, the electrolyte dries up within =L hours and the battery is dead. Even in large, flooded cell batteries, the process takes longer, but the result is the same. The battery becomes useless and can never be charged again. The circuits that do these things are 8ERA counter)intuitive and no one is likely to stumble into them by chance. These discoveries only became apparent after e6tended study by &ohn. Theory can only get you so far. >t some point, e6periment must reduce theory to practice for knowledge to be advanced. Peter

-eter 4indemann 8iew Public Profile 8isit Peter :indemann's homepageB Find all posts by Peter :indemann E1< 2 ermalin*5 0C60/62007, 10:33 *-

>aron
John Bedini D !adiant

piritual Entrepreneur nergy

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

&ohn 'edini R Radiant Energy

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E1; 2 ermalin*5 0C61062007, 07:3C *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 G--

lighty
T:indemann

enior *ember

>s @ understand Tesla's writings in order to get the ma6imum efficiency of coils for producing the greatest amount of radiant energy charge !or rather dielectric charge" one has to observe several rules7

<. The mass of material of primary and secondary has to be e4ual as precisely as possible. =. The surface area of primary and secondary should also be matched. G. The length of the secondary conductor should be as close to <FL wavelength of the fundamental fre4uency of the system. L. The inductance should be as high as possible while the impedance should be as low as possible. 9f course @ oversimplified things in order not to complicate things too much and points <)G are rather straightforward but point L is what bothers me. @n my mind the higher the inductance the higher the impedance of the system. 9f course impedance varies in regard to the resonant fre4uency but all in all Tesla was pretty much determined about the statement about keeping the impedance as low as possible while raising the inductance. @mpedance is definitely lowered while using :it# type conductor, flat strips of conductor or conductive tubes) anything to ma6imi#e surface area. @ guess this is not too far from truth but @ was wondering) is there some other technical aspect to achieving the point L. that @'m missing altogetherQ @ have a nagging feeling there is more to it. 2hat's your take on itQ

T@> lighty

light! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by lighty E1H 2 ermalin*5 0C61162007, 07:2/ *-

Peter :indemann
enior *ember Please, 9tay on topic ;uote7

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 :iberty :ake, 2ashington Posts7 HOK

9riginally Posted by lighty SFindemann #s I understand Tesla.s writings in order to get the ma&imum efficiency of coils for producing the greatest amount of radiant energy charge 8or rather dielectric charge9 one

has to observe several rulesQ 1. The mass of material of primary and secondary has to be e-ual as precisely as possible. *. The surface area of primary and secondary should also be matched. ,. The length of the secondary conductor should be as close to 1E% wavelength of the fundamental fre-uency of the system. %. The inductance should be as high as possible while the impedance should be as low as possible. )f course I oversimplified things in order not to complicate things too much and points 17, are rather straightforward but point % is what bothers me. In my mind the higher the inductance the higher the impedance of the system. )f course impedance varies in regard to the resonant fre-uency but all in all Tesla was pretty much determined about the statement about keeping the impedance as low as possible while raising the inductance. Impedance is definitely lowered while using FitL type conductor, flat strips of conductor or conductive tubes7 anything to ma&imiLe surface area. I guess this is not too far from truth but I was wondering7 is there some other technical aspect to achieving the point %. that I.m missing altogether@ I have a nagging feeling there is more to it. What.s your take on it@ TI# lighty :ighty, Aour 4uestions are about Radiant Energy, but this is a forum about &ohn 'edini's $apacitive ?ischarge 'attery $hargers. The short answer to your 4uestions is that you have a number of similar things confused with each other, and only a detailed answer could straighten all of it out. *y ?8? lecture Tesla.s >adiant ?nergy clears up all of your 4uestions. Peter

-eter 4indemann 8iew Public Profile 8isit Peter :indemann's homepageB Find all posts by Peter :indemann E1? 2 ermalin*5

0C61162007, 0):00 *-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur 2ew !adiant nergy Thread

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Radiant Energy

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E1( 2 ermalin*5 0C61262007, 02:3D &&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 G--

lighty
enior *ember

o let's take this radiant energy discussion over here Radiant Energy

'T2) th6 >aron for starting a new more appropriate thread.

light! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by lighty E1' 2 ermalin*5

1160)62007, 0C:10 &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur 99* cap discharge negative energy

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Iere is a new vid7 AouTube ) 'edini ,egative Energy

0 capacitor discharge

hows the tape motor 0 charging a cap bank and discharging to batt utili#ing negative potential side.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E1E 2 ermalin*5 1160)62007, 0C:3D &&oin ?ate7 9ct =..K Posts7 <,..=

ren
enior *ember

aaron, @ am interested in the cap discharge circuit but @ have a few 4uestions. Firstly you mentioned that your third winding that goes via F2'R to cap is wound in reverse. @ saw this on one of &ohns notes but it didnt sink in until @ looked at it again the other day. ?o you have any theories as to why this third winding is in oppositionQ Iave you tried a regular trifilar to see if there is much differenceQ >nd is the winding wound with the other two or ontopQ Trying to visualise the winding method and if it is with the other two @m thinking @ will have to get the missus to help wind one >nd secondly, @ am trying to get my head around the scr. *y understanding is that it is similar to a transistorQ ?o @ trigger the scr to close the circuit much the same way in which @ trigger the transistor to fireQ ince @ am still learining electronics and MMM's are a little out of my league at the moment @ would have to do this with a timing wheel @ assume.

ren 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by ren E67 2 ermalin*5 1160)62007, 0D:3/ &-

>aron
circuit info

piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Ii Ren, The bigger coils @ used are trifilar with the trigger and power wound first in the correct direction. Then on top of that, @ wound the Grd wire in reverse. >ctually, @ believe &ohn's intended way was to wind all G at the same time in the same direction. @t was my misunderstanding and the dot at the bottom showed it was out of phase as in catching the collapse. Iowever, @ have seen ama#ing results doing it my way. @f they were wound the same, @'m sure there would be a difference but not sure what. @ don't know all the technical differences between an scr, transistor, etc... all @ know is that there is an input and output and the connection is made when a baseFgateFtrigger receives power. >lso, there are differences in switching times, which can be identified on spec sheets...faster the better it seems. $R seems to be more like a diode with a trigger. 9f course there is the inverse...input and output connection is there unless the trigger receives power to turn off the connection as in a P,P transistor. @ think for practical purposes mechanicalFanalog is best. Aou can always cut a piece of copper but you can't always have a MMM at your disposal if the entire electronics industry disappears. @ think you'd have no problem with the MMM circuits. >s long as you 5ust connect all the right connections together you got it.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E61 2 ermalin*5 1160)62007, 07:02 &&oin ?ate7 9ct =..K Posts7 <,..=

ren

enior *ember

@nteresting. Thanks >aron for your prompt response. @t seems to me that the coils in the EFT8 part = !the ones on the capacitor bank monopole with timing wheel" are rather large. >s in much larger than H.. ) <... turns. Perhaps this is because they are wound with the last winding on topQ Perhaps they are 5ust plain old '@0 coils, and @ should stop drooling. @nteresting to note you achieved e6cellent results, @ believe that a winding ontop of another is similar to a transformerQ ?id you measure your wire into G e4ual lengthsQ 'ecause if the third was wound ontop of a larger diameter then counting turns would result in a much larger length for the final winding, noQ @ see what your saying about the scr. @ts like a one way gate waiting for someone to open the latch. @ think @ will try a timing wheel first, theres much to learn even there, and then in time @ will move on to a timed circuit. o much to learnB Thanks again for your insight and advice.

Fast edited by ren Q 117"$7*""! at "!Q** #(.

ren 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by ren

+ onsored 4in*s

E66 2 ermalin*5 1160)62007, 07:30 &-

>aron
coil info piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

yes, with Grd wire on top, it would be longer. @ 5ust counted turns. 9ne coil was <... turns each wire and the =nd bigger one @ did was =... turns... @ counted each and every e6cruciating turnB lol &ohn ' doesn't count the turns...rolls out the length...twists them all together and winds on spools.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E6< 2 ermalin*5 1160)62007, 0):0/ &&oin ?ate7 9ct =..K Posts7 <,..=

ren

enior *ember

lol, @ feel your pain there mate. >lthough counting the turns on my coil was preferable to twisting the G wires together. @ have seen a little coil winder someone made with a pedometer hooked up so a magnet triggered it every revolution. *ade alot of sense to me, >FTER @ finished windingB

>nother 4uestion back on topic .!getting sick of them yetQ

" 2ith cap dumping into a

battery, what is the desirable voltage level in the cap for say a <= v batteryQ 9bviously you dont want it at G..... volts or anything, but is double the voltage of the charge battery !i.e. =Lv in this instance" beneficialQ 9r is that going to be dangerousQ @ have seen some people suggest this, @ note that &' only filled his caps up to about <Ov. @s this voltage regulated by capacitor si#ing or is the discharge into the charge source timed so that the caps cannot increase over this amountQ
Fast edited by ren Q 117"$7*""! at "$Q+* #(.

ren 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by ren E6; 2 ermalin*5 1160)62007, 0D:C2 *-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur cap discharge

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

?ischarge the cap at about = volts over what is in the battery. Aou could do a few more volts over with no problem. The if you reduce the capacitance !uf's", the volts will climb higher faster. 'ut even so, you can make it trigger whenever you want with mechanical switch. 2ith MMM circuit, you would have to ad5ust discharge fre4uency based on how often the cap gets to about = volts over the batt for whatever particular setup.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron

E6H 2 ermalin*5 1160)62007, 07:32 *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 G--

lighty

enior *ember

@ always thought that 'edini dischargers were set to release at least several tens of volts higher voltage than the battery voltageQ

light! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by lighty E6? 2 ermalin*5 1160)62007, 07:3D *&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K :ocation7 :atvia Posts7 <,--O

&eti5s
enior *ember

@n the dvd @ saw him !*r. 'edini" using those huge electrolytic capacitors with one of the models with mechanical comutator. These capacitors looked like those used for car audio systems. They are rated <)G farads and =L8 ma6. @f @ recall it correctly, he used two of them in series. o we can assume he never went over the L-8 at least with that small model.

3etijs 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by &eti5s E6( 2 ermalin*5

1160)62007, 07:0D *&oin ?ate7 9ct =..K Posts7 <,..=

ren

enior *ember

5et if its the same one @m thinking of he puts the mulitmeter on the caps. 9ne of them fills fast to <O v and the other one was a little slower but still T <O v. This is the monopole that has a large coil either side of a vertically rotating acrylic rotor. There is an aluminum timing wheel off to the side which dumps the charge every second or so into the batteries. @ believe it is the one triggered by a hall switchQ

ren 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by ren E6' 2 ermalin*5 1160)62007, 07:C2 *-

$aptain cat

Posts7 nFa

how does the neon bulb switch workQ i have seen the MMMFopto schematic and the mechanical pulleyFcontact switch, but never heard of a neon bulb switch. i am curious

Ca tain+cat E6E 2 ermalin*5 1160)62007, 07:C7 *-

Ewha#
*ember

&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K Posts7 KH

'asically instead of using the optocoupler to trigger the $R they use a neon bulb instead. >s the cap reaches enough charge to 5ump the gap in the bulb, it triggers the $R. The bulb acts as a spark gap.

Ewha: 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by Ewha# E<7 2 ermalin*5 1160)62007, 0):0D *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 G--

lighty
enior *ember ;uote7

9riginally Posted by whaz 3asically instead of using the optocoupler to trigger the S4> they use a neon bulb instead. #s the cap reaches enough charge to 1ump the gap in the bulb, it triggers the S4>. The bulb acts as a spark gap. @ndeed, and >F>@/ the neon bulb conducts at about <..8 and over. That's why @ think the discharge voltage is higher.

Bedini 9olid 9tate -scillators

'edini olid tate 9scillators discussion. 'asically any 'edini circuit that doesn't use a rotor as a trigger. elf)triggering using any variation of the schematics.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB

Find all posts by >aron + onsored 4in*s

E6 2 ermalin*5 0C60/62007, 10:3C *-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur John Bedini D !adiant nergy

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

&ohn 'edini R Radiant Energy

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E< 2 ermalin*5 0C61C62007, 12:10 *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 M.

*ario
*ember 9o many options to test..

Ii Peter, &ohn, >aron @ started e6perimenting with &ohn's technology about half a year ago and at some point @ started concentrating on the solid state energi#er and am trying to get ..there. @'ve recently built a new working platform to e6periment with single to multicoil setups but is e6pandable to about <. multicoils as soon as @ figure out wich one is the best of all possible combinations !@ attached a pic by the way". @n the beginning @ thought to simply hook single solidstate circuits in parallel. then @ started making some tests with different setups, cap) pulsing, single coil output diode, multicoil output diodes, output with recovery coils, etc...

>lso after having been working on a multicoil setup with cap pulsing for 4uite a while, @ got much better results with a normal 0 multicoil setup with output diodes charging the batts rather than one recovery)bridge cap. *ight be because of the lower impedance on the output. till working on it..so many things to testB The other day @ noticed something new, @ was driving only one transistor out of the three hooked to the multicoil, the trigger and base diode were also detached from those two. o while @ was running basically off a single setup @ accidentally connected the output diode to the output diode of one of the not running transistors. @ could hear the fre4 go down a bit, like if you lower the trigger pot to increase power !and current draw". 'ut guess what, the input current dropped, while i could measure an increase on the voltmeter on the charging output batt. o @ hooked up the third output diode of the also not triggered transistor and the results got even betterB o from an electrical point of view @ was driving a single setup and had two (recovery( windings with a single diode each added to it wich gave more output power and took less input current. @ always thought that more than one recovery coil wouldn't gain anything..Q @ also tried to link the three outputs before the diode, wich didn' give the same results. >ny help or hint to get to the best recipe is welcomeB

Peter, @ really liked your e6planations in the radiant energy forum best regards *ario >ttached @mages @*0UL<M-)=.5pg !<=K.< /', H=K views"

, thanks.

Mario 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by *ario E; 2 ermalin*5 0C61762007, 11:21 *-

Peter :indemann
enior *ember ,ore for +ess

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 :iberty :ake, 2ashington Posts7 HOK

*ario,

Thank you for reporting your finding that multiple windings with individual diodes produces more output. The reason that it doesn't work when the coils are paralleled 'EF9RE the diode is that the energy in one coil tends to discharge @,T9 the other coil and vis versa. The diodes prevent this from happening, and the energy recovered from both coils can then be summed. E6actly 2IA there is more energy to recover in this arrangement is not known by me. This is simply an e6perimental result you are reporting. @t sounds very encouraging, and @ hope others try to duplicate the finding. 9ne possible e6planation is this. &ohn 'edini has been saying for a long time that these devices draw energy in from the environment. Aour e6perimental set)up and finding may be significant evidence in support of this idea. >lso, as to what is (the best recipeQ(, 2I9 /,92 B Aou state you have a <. strand multi) coil. Try hooking one strand up as the oscillator and the other H strands as e6tra pick)ups with separate diodes. /eep summing them, one at a time, to see where the benefit ends. That way, you can tell usB 0reat work. Peter
Fast edited by Beter Findemann Q "+71!7*""! at 11Q," B(.

-eter 4indemann 8iew Public Profile 8isit Peter :indemann's homepageB Find all posts by Peter :indemann EH 2 ermalin*5 0C61)62007, 12:03 *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 M.

*ario
*ember

Ii Peter, thanks for the encouragement, @t's actually two L)strand multicoils, and @'m planning on e6panding up to <. multicoils. The first one has M strands because of the trigger. @ have G

transisitors on each coil, the fourth wire was initially planned for cap pulsing recovery, but @ got more out of it with an output diode. Even on a single setup @ noticed that output diode charges faster. @ don't know why. ?o youQ >lso what is the advantage of a fwbr vs single diodeQ The pulses are positive anyway noQ >bout the diode recoveries, @ put ammeters on input and output, and for each setup @ tuned the pot for the same input current to see wich one would give the most benefit on the output. 2ith one transistor working @ added one recovery and could see a distinct benefit, nr two added a bit less and nr G very little. Then @ tried two transistors, the first recoveries added less vs the single setup. $omparing all the setups, firing all three transistors with no recovery seemed to be what gave the best output vs input curent. *aybe 5ust adding transistors is still best, but @ have to repeat this test with switches instead of soldering and de)soldering so many times. @ know ammeters don't measure the radiant part but the byproduct, so do you think the way @ measured this is okQ best regards *ario

Mario 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by *ario E? 2 ermalin*5 0C61)62007, 00:17 *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 G--

lighty

enior *ember

2ell, @ never tried that kind of setup since @ use my variant of = coil :it# wire. The theory is that when magnetic field collapses the flu6 lines of the collapsing field are cutting the surface of the coil !or in this case coils" with tremendous speed and they induce a lot of voltage without much current or in other words a lot of dielectric energy with small amount of electron flow current mi6ed. ,ow, by that token there is no reason not to pickup that kind of energy by every coil within the collapsing magnetic field. The problem @ see with this concept is the fact that if you use snubber circuit on the energi#ing coil in order to drain the inductive collapse energy to either one of the primary source poles the induced voltage on the pickup coils is drastically reduced. >t first glance that could mean that there is some definite amount of energy available in the

system or that it's possible to drain the inductive collapse energy from the whole coils setup almost completely with power coil shorted. Try the following e6periment) put some transil diodes anti)parallel to the semiconductor switch you're using !*9 FET or '&T" and set their trigger voltage to some value above the power source voltage but bellow the voltage of the inductive collapse. Aou will notice that the transils will heat up 4uite 4uickly obviously dissipating the energy of the inductive collapse. The voltage on the pickup coils will plummet to some very low value. o, @ would conclude that the collapsing magnetic field flu6 lines that cut the windings of the pickup coils are not the only reason for the induction of the high voltage spikes. @f they were, then the fact that the primary coil is shorted would mean nothing to the pickup coils. @ will now speculate wildly and assert that the primary and most important coupling of the primary coil and pickup coils is not inductive but rather a capacitive one thus allowing the dielectric fields of both coils to be coupled to a degree. ,ow, if the transil diodes short the primary coil and level the charges !thus effectively killing the dielectric field" the capacitive coupling between coils will allow the transfer of dielectric energy from pickup coil to primary coil thus allowing the shortened primary coil to also sink a dielectric field from the every coil in the setup to which it is capacitively coupled. @ came up with this e6planation based on some observations of the behavior of the switched coils not unlike the 'edini one. @t's probably flawed but at the moment it serves it's purpose. 2hat's been bugging me more is what happens to the dielectric energy when it's not sinked anywhere. 2hat @ mean is) if one doesn't do anything with the inductive collapse energy !no snubber circuit, no transil diodes, no capacitor charging, not a single closed circuit in the whole setup" what happens to itQ @ mean @'ve used *9 FET's capable of handling <...8 on voltage spikes of about -..)H..8 and if the dielectric energy is not sinked anywhere what happens to itQ @ checked out that not a single semiconductor is leaking some current and that there are no closed circuits anywhere on the setup !both in primary and pickup coils" and voltage spikes appear as powerful as ever but the energy is not accumulated in any way. o, what happens to the energy of the inductive collapse in open circuit systemsQ *aybe there is some discharge through the air or there is a dielectric field buildup. 9ne is for sure the energy of the inductive collapse is not being sinked, stored or converted to magnetic field. >ny ideas on this oneQ

light! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by lighty E( 2 ermalin*5 0D61262007, 11:2/ *-

>aron

piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

"aron(s trifilar oscillator

$ircuit originally used on a bike wheel setup but then as self triggering.

Iere is the output over L.. volt spikes This is ,9T the pic &ohn posted, it is what my scope measured on my circuit. Aou can see <=v input on the bottom and the spike is on top.

Fast edited by #aron Q "I71*7*""! at 11Q,1 B(.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E' 2 ermalin*5 1061062007, 07:03 &-

terence<=G
&unior *ember 5sc>5@: is thyristorG

&oin ?ate7 Posts7 ==

ep =..K

according to alldatasheet.co.kr, =scG=-< Z power transistor, not thyristor

terence16< 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by terence<=G EE 2 ermalin*5 1061162007, 01:CC &-

>aron
5sc>5@:

piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Ii Terence, Iere is a pic of the discharge circuit for the cap to dead batts7

The big black one at the top of the pic is the =scG=-<. @ see it listed as a Toshiba audio ,P, transistor. @ have stated it is an $R but @ guess not. >nyway, above is the pic of the e6act circuit in the schematic in this thread.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E17 2 ermalin*5 1061262007, 0):01 &-

terence<=G
&unior *ember

&oin ?ate7 Posts7 ==

ep =..K

thanks for the picture. @t helps a lot. @'m having trouble location good thyristors and knowing that transistors work too will help !since i have a couple in stock 7)""

terence16< 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by terence<=G E11 2 ermalin*5 1061262007, 0):1D &-

terence<=G
&unior *ember tests with solid state

&oin ?ate7 Posts7 ==

ep =..K

Ii, @'ve started some e6perimenting too. Far from finished in this category, but boy, are things strange. @ started with making a trifilair coil with LM. turns !..M<<mm diameter". *ade the oscillating part first to see what it would do. %nfortunately my transistor became too hot, but i was able to switch the circuit on for about <. secs. 9n the output i connected a rectifier bridge and hooked up a cap LK.ufFG-M8. @t would charge slowly and i did several tests !only <.secs.". trange is that the cap used, would, for days, charge itself, when not connected. after a

couple of days it stopped. o i discharged the $apacitor and a day later it would hold <.8oltsB measured with a ?8*. 2eird. @n the meantime i replaced the transistor !forgot type" with a =nG.MM. This one stays cool but charges the capacitor very strongly !@ do not have yet a circuit ready with the MMM for dumping the chargeB" @n a couple of seconds the $ is around =M.8. wild and weird. Iope to have it all running soon. Iave about L dead gel)batteries waiting in the Emergency)Room D)"

terence16< 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by terence<=G + onsored 4in*s

E16 2 ermalin*5 1062262007, 00:3/ &-

piritual Entrepreneur self running oscillator

>aron

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Ii all, &ust been tinkering with the oscillator. @ got it so that @ can disconnect the input battery for up to =.)G. minutes as it self runs. Aes, there are caps and @'m charging it with the Grd isolated winding and running that to the input, then @ can disconnect the input battery. >nyway, @'m not posting diagrams 5ust yet...tweaking it further. The reason @'m even posting this is to show what kind of input the transistor is getting at the trigger versus what is (supposed( to be re4uired to trigger it. The transistor @'m using is an R$> =nG.MM. =.Kk ohm resistor at the base and a <.ohm resistor on the emitter. 89:T ..GM >*P ......GK !...GKma" ))))))))))))))))))))))))))

2>TT

......<=HM watts

The above volts and amps is what is being drawn from the caps on the output and voltage is what is at the trigger according to the scope set to ..<v divisions...part is P and part is ) so trigger voltage is actually less than ..GM volts. @t is oscillating with that input from caps while it is disconnected from the input battery.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E1< 2 ermalin*5 1160062007, 0C:22 &-

Ewha#
*ember

&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K Posts7 KH

2ell, @'m getting my components ready for assembly finally. @'m purchasing components now, based on the olid state oscillator in bedini's free energy generation book. The only thing @'m having difficulty on is that some of the components do not list a voltage, such as the discharging capacitor on the charging side. 2hat should that beQ >lso.. @'ve been wondering for a long time now, why doesn't 'edini use timers etc for his oscillationQ @t seems strange that he is always using the coils field to create the resonance, is there a reason for thisQ @f it is necessary to get optimum E* field characteristics then @ can understand, however if it is not needed... 2ell then that would reduce the number of wires to a coil by <.. 9r leave you with one more charging output line.

Ewha: 8iew Public Profile

Find all posts by Ewha# E1; 2 ermalin*5 1160062007, 10:1D &&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 M.

*ario
*ember 99 oscillator ;uote7

9riginally Posted by whaz Well, I.m getting my components ready for assembly finally. I.m purchasing components now, based on the Solid state oscillator in bedini.s free energy generation book. The only thing I.m having difficulty on is that some of the components do not list a voltage, such as the discharging capacitor on the charging side. What should that be@ #lso.. I.ve been wondering for a long time now, why doesn.t 3edini use timers etc for his oscillation@ It seems strange that he is always using the coils field to create the resonance, is there a reason for this@ If it is necessary to get optimum ?( field characteristics then I can understand, however if it is not needed... Well then that would reduce the number of wires to a coil by 1.. )r leave you with one more charging output line. Ii Ewha#, The transistor part number in the book is wrong and should be '?=LG$, another mistake is pin L and M of the opto, the connections are inverted. @ have tried running the oscillator from a MMM instead of the trigger wire, it works too, but for every fre4 you are tuning to you have to read5ust the duty cycle to get the best signal for that fre4, finally @ found that the trigger winding does this automatically and even better , so @ went back to the winding. regards, *ario

Mario

8iew Public Profile Find all posts by *ario E1H 2 ermalin*5 1160062007, 12:30 *&oin ?ate7 ,ov =..K Posts7 <O

dyetalon

&unior *ember

0reat work, guys. @ read about the 'edini device on 9%.com and other sites but never tried to acutally build anything. @t's good to meet other e6perimenters who work at the component level, too. 2ouldn't FET's have less loss than bi)polar transistorsQ @ mean the higher impedance of FET's should increase the efficiency of the circuit overall. @f @ understand 'edini's theory, he utili#es the back)emf as a secondary source and adds it back into the primary. QQQQ

Fast edited by dyetalon Q 117"%7*""! at 1*Q,! B(.

d!etalon 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by dyetalon E1? 2 ermalin*5 1160062007, 02:01 *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 M.

*ario
*ember ;uote7

9riginally Posted by dyetalon Areat work, guys. I read about the 3edini device on );.com and other sites but never tried to acutally build anything. It.s good to meet other e&perimenters who work at the component level, too. Wouldn.t 2?T.s have less loss than bi7polar transistors@ I mean the higher impedance of 2?T.s should increase the efficiency of the circuit overall. If I understand 3edini.s theory, he utiliLes the back7emf as a secondary source and adds it back into the primary. @@@@

Ii ?yetalon, @'ve never tried using FET's, @ tried to stick to what &ohn recommends, he said bipolars work much better for his machines. >fter G.P years of research @ guess he knows what he's talking about, especially because we're not dealing with conventional EE energy here.

*any people have tried to do mods that seemed better from an electronical point of view but pretty much failed each time to achieve better results... Aou can achieve to feed the input with the output battery wich is rather complicated for different reasons. Ie's utili#ing the potential created by the coil's collapse to trigger the RE event!radiant energy". @f you are 5ust beginning to learn this technology @ recommend sticking to the basics first as there is a :9T to learn eventough the circuit seems simple. regards, *ario
Fast edited by (ario Q 117"%7*""! at "*Q%% B(.

Mario 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by *ario E1( 2 ermalin*5 1160062007, 00:C7 *-

&oin ?ate7 ,ov =..K Posts7 <O

dyetalon
&unior *ember ;uote7

9riginally Posted by ,ario ... 5e.s utiliLing the potential created by the coil.s collapse to trigger the >? event8radiant energy9. If you are 1ust beginning to learn this technology I recommend sticking to the basics first as there is a F)T to learn eventough the circuit seems simple. regards, (ario Aea, you're right. 'est to start with the original design and take it from there. @'ll assume you answered my 4uestion, even though we are using different words to describe the same thing. 'ack E*F is what is generated when you spin an >rmature through a magnetic field. ,ormally suppressed with capacitors or shunt diodes, it seems *r. 'edini is trying to utili#e this effect to generate additional current that would be lost otherwise. ?o you know of anyone who has sucessfully recreated this motorQ >re there any movies on the web that show this wonderful device actually runningQ

Fast edited by dyetalon Q 117"%7*""! at "+Q"% B(.

d!etalon 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by dyetalon E1' 2 ermalin*5 1160062007, 0C:30 *-

lighty
enior *ember ;uote7

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K :ocation7 $roatia Posts7 G--

9riginally Posted by ,ario I.ve never tried using 2?T.s, I tried to stick to what 'ohn recommends, he said bipolars work much better for his machines. #fter ,"P years of research I guess he knows what he.s talking about, especially because we.re not dealing with conventional ?? energy here. *9 FETs or even better @0'Ts proved to be easier to work with for the fast switching applications. Remember that in the setup like 'edini's *9 FETs are used at the primary side where we still operate with (conventional( electricity. 9f course there is a point of self ad5usting oscillator function done with bipolar transistors but that can be tweaked to be done with *9 FETs of @0'Ts as well. 9n the secondary side of the 'edini setup the things are 4uite different and @ found that *9 FETs and @0'Ts are prone to random latch)up, self)triggering and sudden death regardless of the fact that their ma6imum ratings weren't e6ceeded. The rules of engineering on the secondary side are changed and sometimes the proven circuit setup simply doesn't work. @ have a theory on why it happens and in what circumstances but @ prefer to keep it to myself until @'m certain of it.

light! 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by lighty E1E 2 ermalin*5 1160062007, 07:03 *-

Ewha#
*ember ;uote7

&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K Posts7 KH

9riginally Posted by ,ario 5i ?whaL, The transistor part number in the book is wrong and should be 3D*%,4, another mistake

is pin % and + of the opto, the connections are inverted. I have tried running the oscillator from a +++ instead of the trigger wire, it works too, but for every fre- you are tuning to you have to read1ust the duty cycle to get the best signal for that fre-, finally I found that the trigger winding does this automatically and even better regards, (ario 2ell, @ have the right transistor thankfully, but @ did notice the difference after you pointed it out. *aybe this was enough distortion so that the powers that be would leave it alone, who knowsQ 'ut yes, changing the duty cycle on a MMM would be a real pain. @'m assuming that the higher the fre4uency the longer the on cycle would have to be in order to allow it to reach saturation before the field could be allowed to collapse. *ost likely this would re4uire a lot of tuning. till, at least its an option to e6plore later on circuits with different applications. till, what about the capacitorQ The voltage on it is not listed for the charging side capacitor !not the timing". From what @'ve read, you have to be careful not to 'hit' the battery too hard, or it will cause a cascade effect that will cause the battery to e6plode, or at the very least be damaged. @s there a correlation between the type of battery to be charged and the ma6imum voltage that the capacitor can deliver safelyQ , so I went back to the winding.

Ewha: 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by Ewha# E67 2 ermalin*5 1160)62007, 12:1/ *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 M.

*ario
*ember ;uote7

9riginally Posted by whaz Well, I have the right transistor thankfully, but I did notice the difference after you pointed

it out. (aybe this was enough distortion so that the powers that be would leave it alone, who knows@ 3ut yes, changing the duty cycle on a +++ would be a real pain. I.m assuming that the higher the fre-uency the longer the on cycle would have to be in order to allow it to reach saturation before the field could be allowed to collapse. (ost likely this would re-uire a lot of tuning. Still, at least its an option to e&plore later on circuits with different applications. Still, what about the capacitor@ The voltage on it is not listed for the charging side capacitor 8not the timing9. 2rom what I.ve read, you have to be careful not to .hit. the battery too hard, or it will cause a cascade effect that will cause the battery to e&plode, or at the very least be damaged. Is there a correlation between the type of battery to be charged and the ma&imum voltage that the capacitor can deliver safely@ Ii Ewha#, @'d take a cap rated in the L..)O..8 range from about G to <.uF. The voltage to the battery depends on the dump speed meaning the time you let the cap get its charge from the coil. @'ve noticed that the faster you dump the 4uicker the charge rate of the battery, even if the voltage is only about G.)L.8. 'ut @'ve also dumped at over <..v to the batt... @ don't know what the ma6 safe voltage is for a given battery, sorry. regards, *ario

Mario 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by *ario E61 2 ermalin*5 1162762007, 0D:07 &-

Ewha#
*ember

&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K Posts7 KH

>lright. @ got enough of my components to build the solid state oscillator. The only problem is, it doesn't oscillate. @ have a bd=LG$ using the resistor setup in the Free Energy ecrets book.

@'ve got the resistance set up kind of funky though, having to use several in series to get the values @ needed !@ had a bunch of assorted values on hand but not the e6act values @ needed". they are all <FL watt resistors, @'ll be getting the right values later when @ can afford it again.

@'ve checked my setup a few times to make sure everything is wired correctly and tested the transistor to make sure @ didn't burn it already, however it is rated for <..v so there should be no problem. @'m using a solder less bread board. @ tried using a small standard Hv battery to see if it would trigger, which it didn't. The batter did however get overheated after a few minuets which implies a short of some sort. @ can use the Hv to trigger the coil manually and @ have a small neon lamp attacked to one of the output windings to verify its working. 2hen the coil is disconnected the lamp does light up for a short time. >t first @ didn't have the core completely filled with the welding rods, so @ figured it was getting over saturated and keeping the transistor from oscillating. @ finished packing it and tested it again, still nothing. >fter the Hv didn't work, @ also tried hooking it up 8ia a variable >$ power supply put through a rectifier. @ even dialed that in to <=v using my multimeter on the output. till nothing seems to be happening.

@ would post an image, but the information is from a copy written source.

Ewha: 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by Ewha# + onsored 4in*s

E66 2 ermalin*5 1162762007, 0D:2C &-

linesrg
Ehwa#,

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 O.

*ember Problems with the BB5?>.

*y best guess is that your '?=LG$ is 'goosed' as we say here in the %/. @ have had one of the p.LOF Fig. GG oscillators running for a while now. Every time it has failed it has been the

transistor.

tick a diode tester on it.

@n my e6perience the circuit as shown is 4uite finely balanced and e6cursions, even small ones, from the values shown can have a big effect. @n due course you might like to try a *&:=<<HL based version. %se it with a <..ft <->20 trifilar coil based on a Pittsfield si#ed spool with a welding rod core. Aou need to reduce the value of the three resistors around the transistor by a factor of <. and leave all other component values as they are. ,ote the base load resistor needs to be about G2 rated. This device really kicks bottoms !polite phrase". 'e careful if using a 4uadrifilar coil as @ have, the unused strand has 4uite a kick to itBB Regards Richard

linesrg 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by linesrg E6< 2 ermalin*5 1261162007, 03:C3 &-

terence<=G
&unior *ember

&oin ?ate7 Posts7 ==

ep =..K

Ii, @ use a =Lawg LM.turn trifilair, with =nG.MM transistor. 2orks good. The coil was made from an old waterpump)motor from a washing)machine. The core consists of stacked strips !which was a long 5ob to remove without damaging". @ 5ust start to charge battery !L>h,<=8". @ dump around <..)<=.8 in there !L.K microfaradF=M.8 cap". Timing of MMM gives strange effect on oscilloscope. with slowing down the timing of the MMM, the voltage over the cap increases, but it stalls at <=.8. ?unno why it stops there.

terence16<

8iew Public Profile Find all posts by terence<=G E6; 2 ermalin*5 1262/62007, 11:11 *-

Ewha#
*ember *ot it working

&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K Posts7 KH

@ 5ust finished assembling the oscillator yet again, this time with <F= 2 resistors of the value @ needed !one or two as opposed to multiple resistors to get my values" and it worksB @ have a neon lamp hooked to one of the output coils, it lights constantly with the H8 battery to the unit. @ don't know the value of the lamp, but it only lights on a field collapse on the coil. @ don't have the e4uipment to measure the voltage spikes yet, but @'ll get there sooner or later. ,ow @ 5ust have to wait on my batteries, and a few other componants and @ can begin building the capacitive discharge charger side of the circuit and @ can begin testing and perfecting it. @'m e6cited, @'ve been waiting *9,TI 5ust to get this far with my limited budget. >s soon as @ do this proof of concept run, @'ll post the results. >fter that @ have other pro5ects this 'edini coil is going to help me do.. 9 many pro5ects, so little timeB @ also found my camera.. ,ow @f @ can 5ust find that upload cord.. Found it... Ieres some pictures.

*y coil, with the neon lamp lit. @ think the lamp is a <<.v lamp.

Iere's an image of the output @ measured with my 9scope. The voltage isn't accurate because of the limiter to protect my computer, but it shows that it is working.
Fast edited by ?whaL Q "17"17*""$ at "!Q1$ B(. >easonQ #dded ImagesEthumbnails

Ewha: 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by Ewha# E6H 2 ermalin*5 016016200), 0D:3C &-

Ewha#
*ember

&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K Posts7 KH

,ow that @ have the system running, @ had thought of something that @ wonder if any one has tried yet and maybe knows the answer too. %sing multiple coils, not 5ust one trifilar or 4uadfilar coil, but say = 4uadfillar side by side would it be possible to use the one self oscillating circuit to run 'oth coilsQ @s it even possibleQ @f your going to charge a large bank of batteries it might re4uire more than one coil to charge them all. %sing one coil strictly for the oscillation would allow the other coils to be used strictly as slave coils for output, freeing up at least < winding on each coil to that effect.

Ewha: 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by Ewha# E6? 2 ermalin*5 016016200), 07:21 *-

Ewha#
*ember

&oin ?ate7 &ul =..K Posts7 KH

Iere's also an image of the waveform off the charging side. @'m using the neon lamp and scr setup for my capacitive discharge charging side.

@ think this is what every one was speaking of, the voltage spikes as well as the 'h' wave form. The measurements are not to scale however.

Ewha: 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by Ewha# E6( 2 ermalin*5 0160D6200), 01:C0 &-

terence<=G
&unior *ember difference between ssg and solid state

&oin ?ate7 Posts7 ==

ep =..K

Ii, actually, looking at the two different schematics of an 0 and solid)state charger, it looks like the 0 has a direct feedback of the battery's state !impedance" while a solid state has not. @'m trying to bring back a sulfated old battery with a solid state charger. ,ow it strikes me that it would be better to have a 0 doing that because the circuit will adapt while the battery is improving, while a solid state has always the same impedance, since it always sees the same capacitor and the Grd !output" coil has no feedback into the first oscillating circuit. >ny insights or comments on thisQ Terence.

terence16< 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by terence<=G E6' 2 ermalin*5 0161C6200), 0/:C/ *-

'anned ;uote7

chpankme

&oin ?ate7 ,ov =..K Posts7 <OK

9riginally Posted by "aron 'ust been tinkering with the oscillator. I.m not posting diagrams 1ust yet...tweaking it further. It is oscillating with that input from caps while it is disconnected from the input battery. >aron, 2hat trigger signal speed are you usingD secsQ millisecondsQ ) chpankme

+ch an*me 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by chpankme

E6E 2 ermalin*5 0161D6200), 01:10 &-

&oin ?ate7 9ct =..K Posts7 <,..=

ren
enior *ember

Terence, @ think that the solid state may perform better. @ am not sure if this is correct but @ have found that my sg doesnt charge as well as the run battery gets low. @ think this is because the radiant seeks the impedance of the flat battery and as your run gets low and your charge gets high it doesnt transfer as efficiently. $apturing into a cap would @solate this effectively. *y window motor with sg circuit has a cap and scr on the back end and it will charge great, even when the run batt is low.

Please correct my simpleton e6plaination if someone knows better.

ren 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by ren E<7 2 ermalin*5 0161D6200), 0C:0) *-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur trigger ;uote7

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

9riginally Posted by 9chpankme #aron, What trigger signal speed are you usingR secs@ milliseconds@ 7 Schpankme Ii, @ have everything packed up...getting ready to move. 2hen @ set up again, @'ll take videos of this and put it on youtube.

Bedini "dvanced

'edini >dvanced ?iscussion goes here. Reluctance motors and more.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron + onsored 4in*s

E6 2 ermalin*5 0062762007, 0C:20 &&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 LH<

&ohnU'edini
enior *ember reluctance motors from work

To >ll, @n this video @ wanted to hookup one of the reluctance motors from work.!one pole only" @ also want to point out that the circuit is using a hall device, but 5ust like Peters circuit, 5ust like he has posted on his home pages. The timing wheel is the most important part of the device. The iron rods are ground on the ends as to deflect the magnetic fields, same as the coil pole piece, !angles". The motor only runs because it is attracted to the electromagnet and then at the half way point the battery is disconnected and the ground angles take over with the bias magnet. The bias magnet is to apply a little magnetic field to the rods, the reason is to cause a differential in the magnetic field so recovery takes place easy and the rotor moves out of the field easy. @ will post the diagram if the group finds this of benefit. 'ut the design Peter has posted for recovery does work and the motor does run. Aou may view the motor at7 www.icehouse.netF5ohnGLFRecmotor<.mpeg www.icehouse.netF5ohnGLFRecmotor=.mpeg www.icehouse.netF5ohnGLFRecmotorG.mpeg @ admit that @ had to do it in three sections as my camera is not that good. @ feel that something is missing from the recovery in this type of motor, as @ think the iron sucks up all the Radiant energy, you may see something different. The input power is =..*a and it has about the same tor4ue as the monopole =GS.

@f you look at the wave on the scope you can see it almost gives back the input, 'en where are you now we need your input on the wave form. @ 5ust thought that the group would like to see this. &ohn

3ohnVBedini 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by &ohnU'edini E< 2 ermalin*5 0062762007, 0/:37 *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 LH<

&ohnU'edini
enior *ember Ben(s "nswer

Ii &ohn, >ha the beauty of a video, it is worth a million words...*ost e6cellent. @ commend you on your e6cellent demonstration modelB Iubba Iubba. everal things are visible. @ assume you are using a P,PFdiode driveFrecovery circuit similar to what is shown in your electronic package on Peters motor but driven by a Iall effect device. E6cellent. @ also assume the bias magnet is a round ceramic with one face , or outh, don't know the bias but it obviously is there to help the rods switch back after the induced field from the coil reverses and tries to muck things up. This also ties in with the field reversing in the drive core and possibly an attempt to get at least a weak push off this reversal without appreciable generator action. > whole lot going on, spacing of bias magnet, spacingFshape of field coil core. witching speed in rods is also a problem. @ndustrial switched reluctance motors must beat the heck out of the components to reset the fields in the rotorB ?ue to the length of the recovery pulse and the diameter of the rotor and drive stator core in your motor and with the flipping fields, it tries to slow motor down.

Aou're shaping the face of the drive pole and the fi6ed bias magnet modifiesFovercomes this to a point. 8ERA nice s4uare wave to coil ,o evidence of generator action, ,ice I8 !0ood transistor thereB" E*F pulse when you disconnect battery. @ suspect you would get the same basic waveform if you drove it with a signal generator at same duty cycle and fre4uency rate without the rotor. There are several things that could be addressed here. 9bviously the generator action from the turning wheel which also gives back more energy to the charging battery while the drive circuit is off in a monopole or bi)polar motor is missing here as there are basically no magnets. > secondary lightly loaded generator attached to wheel to provideFuse some of the energy generated in the wheel should be helpful, which @'m sure you have considered. @t is possible that if you increased the input !separate power supplies for Iall and coil" voltage using a capacative discharge circuit. Aou might find that the recovery pulse would widen out and possibly become larger than the drive pulse at least up to saturation of coil. > funny beast these reluctance motors. >s a thought, @ wonder if you could use a coil on the R9T9R that via a commutator could use the back E*F to F:@P the rotor to provide push to the rotor after T?$Y. Funky idea. @t would be [ switch reluctance and a [ monopoleB @n pieces here, nothing 9% but as a system, @ don't know. Recovered back E*F pulse to battery and possibly in series with suggested rotor coils and also recovered energy from generator attached to wheelQ 2ho knowsQ @'m 5ust letting my mind wander and wonderB Third, totally enclose drive coil in magnetic containment case like ?$ solenoid construction, this would possibly shapeFintensify the field and increase motor output of wheel. @ wonder if a commercial switched reluctance motor with your recovery circuit with battery and a generator attached what it would do...............Q >gain, &ohn, that is a heck of a nice motorB Respectfully, 'en

Bedini 9chool Boy ,otor

%ser ,ame
Us e r &a me

Top of $orm

Remember *eQ

Password

+og in login

)ottom of $orm

)ome a ge

Energetic +cience Ministries

Regist er

F0 N

Calend ar

Toda!$s -osts

+earc h

M! Blog

-ro%il es

!enewable

nergy?iscussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, \ free energy technologies. >lso any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

Top of $orm

+earch Forums
process 9 9 9

6o

how Threads >dvanced earch

how Posts
)ottom of $orm

Go to -age...
Top of $orm

)ottom of $orm

-ro%iles *y Iomepage *y Profile *y ,etwork earch

4in*Bac* C6D E1 2 ermalin*5 0C61C62007, 10:12 *-

Thread Tools

rickfriedrich
&unior *ember

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 L

2ew self#runner finally puts it all together

This is my latest elf)runner setup with full pictures and video. E6haustive details. ?on't ask for any more. @f you ask @ know you didn't read all the details. ?on't ask to see it as it 2> only intended for encouragement. The time has come to show this all, and &ohn has promised to show this even easier. ?irectory7'edini PE 2iki ?irectory7'edini etails ) PE 2iki 07 elf)Runner )

07 elf)runner

second self)runner ?irectory7'edini 07 elf) runner72indow ) PE 2iki Please see what you think of the pages and tell anyone you want. :et the games begin. @t is all over now.

ric*%riedrich 8iew Public Profile

Find all posts by rickfriedrich + onsored 4in*s

E6 2 ermalin*5 0C61D62007, 02:30 &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur Bedini 9chool Boy ,otor

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Iere is the thread for discussion on the 'edini ( chool 'oy( motor. Reported as self) running, etc...

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E< 2 ermalin*5 0C61D62007, 07:01 &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur e'tra coil

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

$ongrads RickB 0ood work buddy, @'m glad you're doing what you're doing and @'m impressed with what you found. 'esides myself, you're the second person to find out what @ discovered about K years ago. @ was recovering power from the 0 using a coreless coil that was wrapped around a roller skate wheel @t could light bulbs, led's, charge caps, go back to batts, etc...

@ even showed it to &ohn with one application of using it to power an led that @ used an optical tachometer to read the rpm. The thing about it is...you can can get even more power from that coil in a different location and with different geometry that @ have never shared

with anyone. @ only mention this because you're brave enough to post this stuff @ cold take my (recovery coil( and get power from the magnets or place it elsewhere and make power from it 2@TI9%T TIE *>0,ET . >nyway, keep up the good work and feel free to post anything here in this thread about the chool 'oy motor. @ didn't want to 5ust copy and paste stuff from the Peswiki site so if you feel like it, it would be great if you could post the same info here and if not, that's cool too.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E; 2 ermalin*5 0C61D62007, 0/:33 *-

linesrg
*ember konehead(s spatter coils

&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 O.

>aronF Rick and others, 2hy does this remind of such things as konehead's spatter coils and collecting energy from both the near and far from radiant energy devicesQ @'ll need to go back and look at this stuff again. Regards Richard P. . 8ery good work by the way Rick.

linesrg 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by linesrg EH 2 ermalin*5 0C61D62007, 10:21 *-

>aron

piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

near and distant recovery

Ii Richard, :ook at this post by *ario7 'edini olid tate 9scillators @nteresting results that are definitely from near...wrapped on the same coil but not being powered by the transistor, 5ust recovering e6tra of what is already there and produced by 5ust one transistor. 9n Rick's motor, the alternative magnets aren't necessary. @ believe he is doing that because you don't want north both hitting both sides of the coil on the inside that is wrapped around the whole wheel. >ll you have to do is leave all the ,orth magnets and then 5ust bend one end of the coil on the other side upwards enough so that it will be in between two north magnets. Ie is probably getting more from that coil with the ,F F,F , but @ never found it necessary. Even on a little rollers skate motor putting that coil wrapped around it through a bridge and back to the battery made the battery voltage go up appearing to be a self runner but on that particular e6periment, @ found the voltage was very fluffy and didn't make real power very good. :ooked good on the meter though. Running =L hours is ok but @'d like to see it run for a whole week and keep it self charged up.

0aron

8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E? 2 ermalin*5 0C61762007, 02:0C &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur school girl window

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

chool girl roller skate motor

small (window coil(

roller skate motor with window coil

roller skate motor with window coil powering :E?

this is one of the old coils and configurations from about K)- years ago using a small coil surrounding the wheel and resting on the a6le. Everything else is bo6ed up and this is all @ have besides some bike wheel stuff and trifilar oscillator circuits. >nyway, @'m posting this 5ust for the concept that a coil like this can be used to power an :E? like in the original roller skate wheel motor but obviously not a pickup coil with a core and this doesn't cause any drag that @ can notice. The coil can be wound one way to power the :E? on the power pulse or wound the other way to catch the collapsed pulse. Aears ago @ thought it was cool to be able to power the coil without the transistor, 5ust connect the coil straight to the battery on both ends and the :E? wouldn't light up. Then, as soon as @ disconnected the battery, the light would light up. That taught me long ago that you can get work from the system when turning it offB ,o mystery to everyone here but that made a deep impression on me. :ooking at this coil, one may think the magnets on the rotor are what are inducing the current in the coil to light the bulb and it $>, be from that but isn't necessarily so. This video is 5ust the plain motor running as normal on a <=v battery. http7FFwww.esmhome.orgFlibraryF5ohn)...schoolgirl.wmv

== seconds =.-=*' 2*8 video format This video shows that the coil is powering the :E? with the induced current from the magnets spinning on the rotor. @ disconnect the battery and the :E? still lights proving that the magnets on the rotor are doing it. http7FFwww.esmhome.orgFlibraryF5ohn)...irlwindow<.wmv <H seconds =.LK*' 2*8 video format This vid shows that the coil powering the :E? will only power the :E? when there is battery power because the light goes out when @ disconnect the battery and will only light it when the power is on. http7FFwww.esmhome.orgFlibraryF5ohn)...irlwindow=.wmv <M seconds =..-*' wmv video format Iaving the coil not produce power from the magnets on the rotor but from the electromagnetic coil will cause much higher voltage from that coil than with 5ust the magnets ) or you can get a combination of both. @t can charge small caps higher than the battery voltage. @ had that setup charging the input battery without any timing system, 5ust the cap was going to the battery through the diode. The input battery would climb but on that setup the input battery voltage climbed but wound up getting to be pretty fluffy and wouldn't power a load very well after a while but on the meter the voltage did go up. >nyway, 5ust a simple thing to try and results can be had with a smaller scaled system.

This

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E( 2 ermalin*5 0C61762007, 00:C1 &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur 9chool *irl window coil led from distance

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

@t should be obvious where the real strong power in this coils come from in the

0 and it is

not the magnets. The magnet induction in this coil is weak compared to this.

video of e6ample http7FFwww.esmhome.orgFlibraryF5ohn)...eddistance.wmv <- seconds =.=L*' wmv video file

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E' 2 ermalin*5 0C62062007, 00:0) &-

>aron

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

piritual Entrepreneur <window coil< ;uote7

9riginally Posted by "aron )n >ick.s motor, the alternative magnets aren.t necessary. I believe he is doing that because you don.t want north both hitting both sides of the coil on the inside that is wrapped around the whole wheel. This is my misunderstanding about that (window( coil around the wheel. @t wasn't being used but Rick said it was getting M v from it. @n his diagram, he has <O magnets. That means the same poles are hitting that coil on both sides. @ think that tries to negate each other out and only gives him M volts from it. Iis diagram says it could be used to charge another battery with M voltsQ 2ouldn't it make sense for the magnet N around the wheel to be divisible by G since that would make , and on opposite sides of the coil to get more from that window coilQ Even the small one on the roller skate motor, from the magnets alone, there isn't much voltage but it is much higher having the regular coil's magnetic field go through it to cause it to generate the power. @ don't know if it really takes away from what is going back to the coil or if it is capturing e6tra coming back !if it is wrapped to be powered on the collapse instead of the power on pulse".

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron EE 2 ermalin*5 0C62062007, 11:22 &-

>aron

piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Bedini 9* self runner plan

This is the variation of Ricks duplication attempt @'m going to make since @ already have 5ust about everything to make it. @n Rick's schematic, @ don't see why the charging battery needs to be disconnected. @t 'may' capture a little wee pulse from the magnets while

the primary is disconnected as long as it stays connected. @n my schematic, @'m only going to disconnect the primary ) >,? @'m going to keep the recovery bridge P connected to the P on the primary and instead, @'m going to connect the ) of the bridge to the primary when the primary battery's ) disconnected from the rest of the circuit. >bout O years ago when @ had a bicycle wheel 0 running in the back of my workplace, @ had = trifillars and < of them, @ used as a recovery coil. @ got the idea from &ohn's original skate wheel schematic showing a recovery coil. @ pulsed it to a cap and discharged with mechanical switch with <7< ratio and also with a pulley. The discharge switch @ used is virtually identical to what Rick F is using now but mine was more simpler and @ could manipulate the copper tabs to flick the switch slower or faster on each rotation. The switch disconnected the primary and at that moment it would discharge the cap to the primary. The volts went up on this and it 5ust worked so so but @ proved the concept to myself. @ also tried it without the cap and that worked so so for me too. >t that moment, @ messed with the circuit and suddenly thought @ discovered some cosmic energy source when my coil was humming and a cap bank of over <..,...uf was charging up to O. volts in 5ust a few seconds. 'asically, discovered the self)oscillating effect...my resistance was set too high at the base plus having =... turns per wire on my trifilar helped. >nyway, @ tried many variations of these things but the oscillating effect O years ago really got me on that track. @ found several variations that made my roller skate motor's primary climb in voltage, but after a while the voltage was higher but the rpm's got slower and slower. &ust like it was 5ust a fluffy charge that wouldn't power a real load...like itself. @t is possible Ricks method of disconnecting the charging batt will give better results but only e6perimentation will tell. That switch can be put on a6le for <7< rotation or on pulley system so more turns per discharge in case wheel is smaller diameter. Aou can do this with a roller skate wheel if your switch pulley is big enough to let the wheel go round plenty to charge the coil before discharging. >lso, @ believe it can still be monopole with ,orth facing out from the magnets around rotor. &ohn mentioned that the give e6tra window for the discharge but with this mechanical switch that has been there since the <H-L book, it can be whatever window you want regardless of magnet orientation or spacing. This schematic is what @'m going to do ne6t7

Fast edited by #aron Q "+7*"7*""! at 1*Q"" B(.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E17 2 ermalin*5 0C62162007, 0D:0) &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur Bedini(s ,agneto nergizer

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

TIE AE>R @

<H-L

>fter looking at what Tom 'earden did in the book Electromagnetics part L, This is what @ did in <H-L to make the first model =. @ knew that it must be a switching and impedance problem, @ also knew allot about pulse charging systems and what they did to the lead acid storage batteries. @ also knew about charging batteries with huge $apacitor 'anks. @ was good at this because of the >mplifiers we were building at the time. Aou run into all kinds of @mpedance problems and Phasing, so this was a piece of cake. @ also knew about *ass weight and what flywheels did and how they stored energy. @ figured that the generator could not be the normal kind because they were saying the word 2 !*%H ! which really means ,"*2 T-, but this did not answer the 4uestion of where the current came from, the ."P".%T-! was the answer. The ,"*2 T- would charge this very fast and to Iigh 8oltages some times <. times the battery voltage. 2hen the machine first ran it would e6plode the batteries if they were bad, so @ put the switch < to control it. 2hen the battery would get low @ would switch < to charge the battery back up. This was <- years ago with what we have today this machine can be made real easy if you tinker with it and get it set right. The 2 !*%H ! Iow did @ come up with this one you see in the picture. *y uncle was a old time mechanic who was a real tinker, he use to tell me of the old lighting circuits 5ust after the horse and carriage days and things that people would never believe, this is where *y ,"*2 T- comes from. @ told &im 2atson how to do this, @ never thought that he would build a *achine that big but Ie did and that's the story of this machine. &im got paid off @ got pushed agents the wall and told to buy gasoline the rest of *y life but once you see something like this you never give up.

@n <H-L we could not 5ust go down the street and by switching controllers, we 5ust had to make are own from whatever parts we could find there were no *oss Fets no @'0T's 5ust '@) Polar Transistors and some very good ones, but the easiest to do was a switched commutator as shown in the drawing which developed the most power with out loss. This machine worked the same way described in 0abriel /rons statements talking about the (-P 2and .+-9 B< paths.

This brings us to /ron's analogy said a different way.

)hen the #enerator $%A#&'T()current becomes zero the circuit is self#su""orting as the negati!e resistance of the circuit .ust su""ly the energy consumed by the "ositi!e resistance in the .apacitor.)hen the +otor current is "ositi!e the circuit draws energy from the "attery, and when the current is negati!e the Ca"acitor circuit "um"s back energy into the source$"attery) this is known as?

o"en#"aths? and @closed#"aths?. hat disco!ery of o"en#"aths established a second rectangular transformation matri1... into the Ca acitor which created >lamellar> currents. his circuit uses "ositi!e resistance in the %otor by an inductance and a negati!e resistance by a Ca acitor ban) collecting charge *rom the %agneto. 9hat is it that I@m reall$ sa$ingM# I@m sa$ing once the machine starts and is p lsed b $ the controller, or comm tator there is a s(itching taking place bet(een the motor and the magneto sing a capacitor that is being charged b$ the magneto in the 2-E/ path, (hile the motor is dra(ing a momentar$ c rrent in a C42+E& path the t(o do not interfere (ith each other# ?o the magneto is something +T0T1C like a lighting bolt, A st a C)0RGEno real c rrent# 1his is (here theTR0/+F2RM0T12/ takes place from +T0T1C to real sable c rrent for discharge across the batter$# 1he s(itching takes place and the capacitor discharges across the storage batter$, b t onl$ to the level of the storage batter$, so the level of the ,"*2 T- m st be C times the batter$ voltage , the capacitor is no( at the level of the storage batter$ and the process starts all over# 'o( $o have 9R2/$+ open and closed path s$stem (ith no interacting gro nds# If the batter$ is in good shape the impedance is aro nd #0023 ,hms# If this is done fast eno gh and correct $o (ill get a constant high c rrent flo(ing to the batter$, (hat the motor is sing for po(er is not (orth talking abo t# 1he s$stem here can be done man$ (a$s this is A st one# 6666666666666666666666666666666 1he above is from .ohn >edini@s page here: 1he =ear is 1/)0 *ersonall$, I believe that is the best e%planation for self r nning ?! on the internet or an$ self r nning electrical s$stem for that matter# 7ven if a machine is self r nning and appears the loop is closed, it is pse do closed beca se it still never reall$ is closed#

Fast edited by #aron Q "+7*17*""! at "$Q, #(.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E11 2 ermalin*5 0C62362007, 12:C0 &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

sg switch

switch based on my drawing low budget low tech style empty cd rom case fit over shaft. copper strips taped to case screw insulated with tape left brush for the emitter negative connection middle brush common for emitter and discharge switch right brush only for discharge switch

video clip closeup of switch action 'edini 0 switch video

Fast edited by #aron Q "+7*,7*""! at 1*Q+, #(.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB

Find all posts by >aron + onsored 4in*s

E16 2 ermalin*5 0C62C62007, 0/:11 &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur Bedini 9* 9elf !unner

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

M video clip compilation of Rick Friedrich's videos showing his self)running energi#er. $harges the input batter while charging a secondary battery. http7FFwww.esmhome.orgFlibraryF5ohn)...elf)runner.wmv =. minutes <-.= *' wmv video format

0 bike wheel

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E1< 2 ermalin*5 1161062007, 0/:C1 *&oin ?ate7 >pr =..K Posts7 -

:uther0
&unior *ember "lternative .oil *eometry

Iello >aron, Aou wrote7 I even showed it to 'ohn with one application of using it to power an led that I used an

optical tachometer to read the rpm. The thing about it is...you can can get e&en more power from that coil in a different location and with different geometry that I ha&e ne&er shared with anyone. I only mention this because you.re brave enough to post this stuff 2ould you please reconsider sharing this different geometryQ Thanks and best regards, :uther

4utherG 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by :uther0 E1; 2 ermalin*5 1161C62007, 02:2D &-

>aron
geometry

piritual Entrepreneur

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Ii :uther, @ won't post any details on this but will tell you that there is something that is more practical with possibly more benefits that @ will post once testing is complete. Everyone is going to love it @ think and it does have to do with geometry.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron

E1H 2 ermalin*5 1161C62007, 00:0/ &&oin ?ate7 9ct =..K Posts7 <,..=

ren

enior *ember

E6citing stuff guys. @ am getting geared up to replicate this self runner. >aron, @ was looking at some schematics of 'edinis and the cap pulsing trifilar interested me. The trigger and power coil arent feeding through the diode to a secondary, basically because all your potential is being captured on the third winding. 2ould a ssg setup which charges the secondary off collector still be as beneficial in a trifilar cap setupQ 9r am @ better off 5ust capturing off the third winding. 'asically, can @ run both off the same coilQ 9r should the capFbridge pulser be a separate coilQ Posting some pics soon, taken my time cutting a acrylic rotor, its a pain to center but it will look good when finishedB

ren 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by ren E1? 2 ermalin*5 1161C62007, 0):3) &-

>aron
piritual Entrepreneur self runner

&oin ?ate7 Feb =..K :ocation7 2ashington Posts7 K,LH=

tate

Ii Ren, Aou can charge a cap and charge a batt from an 0 diode at the same time but would dilute each of the results. @ would recommend e6perimenting with an isolated winding. 9n the self runner, @ have had similar concepts increase the front battery voltage, but @ must warn you that if there isn't enough current, which has been my e6perience and only pure radiant back to the input, the voltage will climb but the battery will get damaged. Aou need the bare minimum amount of electron current to put the battery in charging mode. >lso, the battery gets goofy if you try to alternate the charging and powering modes like

this. They like to either power constantly or be charged constantly for a while but not flopping back and forth. @t is a good demo to see the possibilities and a better way to do it and is a good learning e6perience but @ wouldn't say it will be good for practical use and @ don't think Rick is claiming it is a practical way to do it either but @ could be wrong.

0aron 8iew Public Profile 8isit >aron's homepageB Find all posts by >aron E1( 2 ermalin*5 1260/62007, 12:3) *&oin ?ate7 ep =..K Posts7 -K.

elias
enior *ember Bid you succeed in getting outputs of :I/oltsG

>aron, @ asked you some time ago about the self)runner and you told me then that you had not achieved those thousand volt outputs of Rick's self)runner, @ don't get any high peaks either. Iave you been able to get those high peaksQ @ am curious to know why should this happenQ @ get a sinwave output in the order of =.)G. volts peak)to)peak but not <... voltsB @t is enough to light a <= volts light bulb very bright. >lthough it drags a bit when getting current from the coil, but the drag becomes negligible when the output of the coil is connected to a capacitor with a rectifier. @t would be good if Rick came up and talked about this a little bit. Elias

elias

8iew Public Profile Find all posts by elias E1' 2 ermalin*5 1260/62007, 01:30 *&oin ?ate7 ep =..K Posts7 -K.

elias
/ery interestingE

enior *ember

@ took a second look at Rick's schematic, and saw a very interesting claim7 2hy should the coil produce over <...v when one side of it is connected to the battery negativeQ @t does not make any conventional senseB @ will test to see if this works, @ was not doing that. Iave any one got any idea of why these high voltages are producedQ Elias

elias 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by elias E1E 2 ermalin*5 1260/62007, 01:C/ *&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K :ocation7 :atvia Posts7 <,--O

&eti5s
enior *ember

Elias, @ tested the selfrunner setup and it did produce pulses of =...8. 'ut the recovery coil must be pulsed to get this result and also in the right timing. @f @ did not pulse)discharge the coil, it produced only about G.8, but when @ pulsed at the right time on each revolution with a relay to the primary battery, @ could get those high voltages. >lso, if @ loaded the recovery coil 5ust with a light bulb, it created a serious drag on the wheel, but when pulsing the coil, it did not create any drag at all @ will draw a schematic of my setup later

3etijs 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by &eti5s E67 2 ermalin*5 1260/62007, 03:07 *&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K :ocation7 :atvia Posts7 <,--O

&eti5s

enior *ember

Iere is the circuit @ used for the self runner setup

@he timing must be e6act to get those high voltage spikes. @ used a tiny magnet on the rotor, that triggered a reedswitch allowing the relay to pulse the energy from the recovery coil to the primary battery. @n the same time the rest of the circuit is disconnected form the primary battery. The recovery coil has to have at least =.9hms resistance, the higher the better, because when the speed rises at startup, you can see on the meter, that the voltage across the recovery coil increases. 'ut the =...8 spikes start to appear only when about G.)GM8 are reached. o if your recovery coil can not generate at least G. volts conventionally, it will be hard for you to get those high voltage spikes. @f so, 5ust add some

more turns of wire on your coil. The magnets are in , , configuration. Aou must place the neo magnet so that it triggers the relay 5ust after the , magnet has passed by the primary power coil and 5ust before the ne6t , magnet. That way you will get the high voltage. >ttached @mages selfrunner.5pg !<<.L /', MO views"
Fast edited by 'eti1s Q "171$7*""$ at 1*Q%+ #(.

3etijs 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by &eti5s E61 2 ermalin*5 1260/62007, 0D:00 *&oin ?ate7 ep =..K Posts7 -K.

elias
enior *ember Ahat(s the spec of your coils. ;uote7

9riginally Posted by Jeti&s The recovery coil has to have at least *")hms resistance, the higher the better, because when the speed rises at startup, you can see on the meter, that the voltage across the recovery coil increases. 3ut the *"""D spikes start to appear only when about ,"7,+D are reached. So if your recovery coil can not generate at least ," volts conventionally, it will be hard for you to get those high voltage spikes. If so, 1ust add some more turns of wire on your coil. 2ell thank you &eti5s, *ay you tell me the specs of your coilsQ @ mean what gauge wire and how many turnsQ @t seems that thinner wire maybe better, because it will have more impedance and more turns of it will fit it, @ was thinking to use NGM, NGO, what do you thinkQ we need not current, and only potential. Iave you put capacitors at the end of the bridgeQ @ used a capacitor and it seemed that it had no drag on the rotor, despite the fact that loading it certainly has. @ think that capacitors don't draw much current to get charged, and are charged mostly by potential.

Elias

elias 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by elias + onsored 4in*s

E66 2 ermalin*5 1260/62007, 07:01 *&oin ?ate7 >ug =..K :ocation7 :atvia Posts7 <,--O

&eti5s
enior *ember

elias, *y recovery coil has about G... turns or more with gauge =L wire and some gauge =< wire. @ had not enough gauge =L wire so @ continued to wind the coil with a different wire si#e that @ had. The resistance of the coil was G< 9hms. The more turns, the higher the voltage generated and also the less speed is needed to get to the point where the high voltage spikes appear. The rotor speed is important, because if you use a relay for pulsing you should know that it can only operate at <.)<LI# or so. @f the rotor speed is too fast, the relay wont have enough time to switch, if the speed is too slow, there will be less voltage generated. The spikes wont appear if you don't pulse)discharge the coil. o you may consider some different switching method. >lso @ did not use a capacitor across the bridge rectifier althought that did not create any noticable drag. >s far as @ know, Rick also did not use any capacitors nor did &ohn /oorn who also succesfully replicated the self runner. @ did not get the setup to self run, but @ did got the high voltage and that is the first step. >fter all @ abandoned the selfrunner replication process, because @ found that pulsing a battery this way damages it and the battery will eventually fail. @t is better and easier to pulse the high voltage to another seperated battery, this way you do not need to get the timing e6actly right.

Fast edited by 'eti1s Q 1*7" 7*""! at "!Q%+ B(.

3etijs 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by &eti5s E6< 2 ermalin*5 1261062007, 07:C7 &&oin ?ate7 ep =..K Posts7 -K.

elias
enior *ember Thanks ;uote7

9riginally Posted by Jeti&s elias, (y recovery coil has about ,""" turns or more with gauge *% wire and some gauge *1 wire. I had not enough gauge *% wire so I continued to wind the coil with a different wire siLe that I had. The resistance of the coil was ,1 )hms. The more turns, the higher the voltage generated and also the less speed is needed to get to the point where the high voltage spikes appear. The rotor speed is important, because if you use a relay for pulsing you should know that it can only operate at 1"71%5L or so. If the rotor speed is too fast, the relay wont have enough time to switch, if the speed is too slow, there will be less voltage generated. The spikes wont appear if you don.t pulse7discharge the coil. So you may consider some different switching method. #lso I did not use a capacitor across the bridge rectifier although that did not create any noticeable drag. #s far as I know, >ick also did not use any capacitors nor did 'ohn Goorn who also succesfully replicated the self runner. I did not get the setup to self run, but I did got the high voltage and that is the first step. #fter all I abandoned the selfrunner replication process, because I found that pulsing a battery this way damages it and the battery will eventually fail. It is better and easier to pulse the high voltage to another seperated battery, this way you do not need to get the timing e&actly right.

Thanks @ did a simple e6periment, to see how one can obtain charge from the coils without drag, this is one of my conclusions, @f one attaches a large capacitor to the output of the coil it would drag the rotor a bit while charging, but if one places the iron core of the coil a bit away from the rotor and brings the core closer to the rotor while the capacitor charges, then no significant drag is felt.

9ne can design a generator this way which moves the cores of the coils while charging the capacitor, with no significant drag.

elias 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by elias E6; 2 ermalin*5 1261062007, 02:2/ *-

albert*unich
*ember Battery getting damaged by recovery coilG

&oin ?ate7 ,ov =..K :ocation7 ,orth of *unich 0ermany Posts7 MO

Iello everybody, @ have been following this discussion with great interest. @ have tried the recovery coil and as you have said the battery voltage will remain constant for a while but then it drops and the whole process seems to damage the battery. o it seems to be a bad idea to flipflop the primary for a longer time. Rick never mentioned a longer test. @ think that in the end it will run down....but @ would love to be wrong here..... >s to the voltage spikes7 @sn't there a phase difference when you use the , , magnet systemQ @ think you might get a phase difference between the voltage on the negative side of the circuit and the spike being generated in the recovery coil. depending on where you put the coil on the circumference of the wheel. This way the voltages in the circuit and in the coil might add to each other..QQQ @ strongly recommend to everyone to test at least a =L volt setup of the bedini machine. @ run my machine !five coils" on G batteries !GO to L. 8olts" on both sides. everything works much better this way, @ use the G.MM transistors and all you have to change is the setting of the trigger pot !wire wound is a must here". watch the rotor speed though. @ try not to go over =..)==. rpm on my bike rim rotor. @ wonder if some sort of lockup also happens when one swaps batteries in the setup without a pulsing cap. The output batteries fill with the radiant and with my current setup @ seem to be able to swap batteries only as long as @ stay with two very well charged batteries. @n the <G to <L voltFbattery range. > good way to measure the point where battery swapping is best done is to look at the sum voltage between primary neg and secondary positive pole. This drops at first )the surface charge dissipates) but then goes up ) the secondary will charge a bit faster as the primary goes down. :ead acid batteries have these funny discharge curves where they can stay at a certain voltage for a long time and then they will suddenly drop. @f you look at hte sum

voltage these non linearities cancel themselves out somewhat. @ can do this swapping several times and then the batteries seem to (lock up( the secondary 5ust won't charge anymore. @ have tried the recovery to a different battery by using an unused trigger wire in one of the coils. &ust a F2'R on the coil. That seems to work but it slows down the charging in the rest of the batteries. There is still a lot to learn for me on these circuits.... @ think this forum is the best one around and having ?R :indemann at your sides certainly helpsB /eep up the good workB >lbert

al#ertMunich 8iew Public Profile Find all posts by albert*unich E6H 2 ermalin*5 016276200), 00:22 *&oin ?ate7 ep =..K Posts7 -K.

elias
enior *ember 9elf#!unner 9pikes

Ii @ finally got some time to e6periment with the self)runner coils. >s @ e6perimented thoroughly @ conclude that the high voltage spikes appear after the swicth opens like the collapsing magnetic fields when pulsing the coils, but this time the coil is charged by the moving magnet instead of the battery. 2hen the battery is pulsed, the spike is release afterwards, when the relay opens. o @ think that as we pulse the battery these spikes get stored in the capacitance of the coils and build up there for better pulsing each time, but not so sure. *aybe we can capture these spikes and charge another battery with them. The attached scope shot clearly shows the fact that the spike is released when the relay is opened. Elias

httpA//groups.yahoo.com/group/Hedini_)G/ Fiscussion group for the open sourcing of the simplified version of .ohn Hedini's ')chool Girl' circuit and motor& which allegedly taps into radiant energy in the process of charging batteries. 3roject pageA httpA//peswi-i.com/inde8.php/FirectoryAHedini_)G
<n the fall of /##4 an +group was founded to attempt a replication of .ohn Hedini's wonderful free energy machines. 2 number of the posters were sycophants& and the below post is an e8ample of the blind faith some of the members placed in *r Hedini. Message HI of -., *ateJ "hu :ct D,, D..9 9J9D pm +ub3ectJ 0eJ K4ediniL+MN *ear Mroup Members Fohn 4edini %hen in the presence of a master one should be accepting and diligent in performing the tas$s. 'ven though you do not understand at the time 3ust do and perform the tas$. *on!t annoy the master with trivialities, he has given you what you need. "o as$ thoughtful 7uestions is important but to thin$ is more important. "o presume you $now more about what he does or disprove him with some theory or another is obno ious and stupid and rude. 2n this case this person does not deserve to be your master. #n automatic separation will happen. #s in this case on this email list. >owever& the +group did contain a few members who were of a mildly critical disposition& and some brave fol-s actually re1uested *r Hedini provide charts& scope shots& and other data& to validate his claims of free energy. <n response to this& Hedini posted some commentsA Message OI of -., *ateJ %ed :ct D., D..9 IJ/8 pm +ub3ectJ #n #nswer to Poen, 6orace, and others, by Fohn 4edini 2 will not supply +tefan any charts,waveforms, etc.....+tefan ....loo$s li$e he is unwilling to devote his attention to anything 2 have said to him. 2 have answered his 7uestions with complete honesty at every turn...... +tefan has a vast lac$ of $nowledge in this field, and apparently, so do you. +vidently getting nervous& *r Hedini then made a rather startling claimA (ere is NO 8ree ele,tri,it4 pro23,e2 in t(ese s4stems, or an4 ot(er s4stem t(at ! 5no6 o8. ?hich came as news to most of us who have followed *r Hedini over the years. 2pparently sensing that things were starting to get a little difficult& given that no0one could replicate his claimed 4A! free energy gain& *r Hedini then withdrew& and refused to answer any further 1uestions. Message H/ of -., "hu :ct D,, D..9 9J,H pm +ub3ectJ *ear Mroup Members Fohn 4edini 6owever, it saddens me to see that this forum has become a clearinghouse for "other topics" which 2 believe will not help the learning process. "herefore, 2 have decided to leave the group. 2 remain willing to help anyone who is actually building a replica of my motor, but 2 can no longer spend #5> time responding to other sub3ects. Mood luc$. 2 believe 2 have given you all the necessary tools to prove to yourselves what 2 have been saying. Fust stay focused on the e perimental process and let 5ature teach you the truth. Hut then if we e8amine an earlier post& then perhaps the reason for *r Hedini not wanting to post any data becomes clearA

Message O, of -., "ue :ct ,8, D..9 8JI- pm, +ub3ectJ +cope shots Ghec$ out the last couple months of Peelynet messages, 4edini says that the "magic" doesn!t show up on meters (so it wouldn!t show up on a scope, either). 6e also states on his website that hoo$ing meters, etc. up to the motors can $ill the effect. )o the free energy effect& can not be measured& does not show up on e1uipment& and the act of measuring it& causes it to go away. Dne is left wondering if the effect is imaginary& and it dissapears when a probe is attached& because it does not in fact actually e8ist. (inally& < felt this post from *r Hedini gives a fascinating insight into how 'free energy' researchers actually do their measurements. <n the wonderful world of cran- science& a 3$W efficient system 9measured:& properly interpreted with a magic 'radiant energy' theory supplied by D1 %ete1 Lindemann DSc& suddenly becomes a /5#W gain 9not measurable:. <romJ "3ohnLbedini", "ue :ct ,8, D..9 HJI8 pm +ub3ectJ +terling did you write this. Fohn 4edini 2f you did write this, let me 3ust direct your attention to your own data. >our meters are GB'#0B> +6:%25M that "electrically" the output of the system is only /OQ of the input, but, the output battery is charging at almost the same rate as the input battery is dropping. "his indicates that the "radiant infusion" is ma$ing up for the difference. 0ight now, even if you are not 7uite at brea$ even, your system is running at a G:P of about D.O (,C./O A D.HH) #nd this is before you have even optimi&ed the circuit. +o, the G:P of the system 2+ the 0adiant Main? #ll of your "electrical losses" are almost already compensated for, but the 0adiant Main *:'+ 5:" show up on the "electrical meters"? 4ut it does show up 25 "6' 4#""'02'+? <urther fine tuning of the circuit can raise the G:P even more. Ieaders are left free to draw their own conclusions about the free energy technology of .ohn Hedini. Hut < thin- the reasons most free energy researchers prefer not to participate in open discussion& or give their devices over to independent third party testing& are self evident. J"#N BEDINI I& UI! !ES!S
FromG <garr$< Qgarr$Ic###R &ateG 1 e +ec 2, 2003 0:0) pm +u#jectG Ge: Jfree6energ$K Ge: I feel the need to http:44gro ps#$ahoo#com4gro p4free6energ$4message4C713

!* 9ar$+ :thers+ :)e" $our e$es )lease ;e3ore $ou start tell*"# the 'orld ho' 'o"der3ul someth*"# *s. 5he 7(hool#*rl motor ra" 3or da$s at a s(hool s(*e"(e 3a*r ea(h da$ *t ra" 3or hours a"d *ts stated dra' 'as 1% or 20 ma or there a;outs. <*rst $ou "eed to do the ;as*( maths a"d see ho' mu(h )o'er *t uses *" 2 hours a"d the" $ou s*m)l$ "eed to tra(0 do'" a ;atter$ (om)a"$ o" the "et a"d 3*"d out 'hat the % 1olt ;atter$ (o"ta*"ed.

5o sa1e $ou t*me let me s*m)l$ tell $ou ;e(ause = a(tuall$ too0 the t*me to do th*s at 20ma that>s 100 ma a da$ a"d 00 ma 3or the 'ee0 so ho' mu(h *" o"e o3 these ;atter*es+ 'ell = #uess *t '*ll sur)r*se $ou to lear"t that there *s *" 3a(t % ma *" a a1era#e % 1olt ;atter$+ so *3 the motor had ru" 3or a (ou)le o3 da$s more ma$;e a"d = reall$ do mea" ma$;e *t 'ould ha1e ;ee" someth*"# to 'r*te home a;out+ $ou see ma"u3a(tur*"# (om)a"*es ha1e to ma0e sure the*r )rodu(t *s 3*t 3or *ts )ur)ose o" most (ou"tr*es a"d so to sa$ that the ;atter$ has % ma *" *t mea"s that the$ "eed a mar#*" 3or error. =ts a ;*t l*0e #o*"# to the su)ermar0et a"d ;u$*"# )otatoes+ the ;a# (a" ;e as mu(h o1er'e*#ht as $ou l*0e ;ut *t *s "ot allo'ed to ;e a #ram u"der'e*#ht. 7o there $ou ha1e *t+ 'hat *s ama?*"# *s "ot the motor ru""*"# 3or so lo"# at all ;ut ho' ma"$ )eo)le do">t ;el*e1e th*s *s )oss*;le a"d so *t must ;e someth*"# s)e(*al+ 'he" s(*e"(e a"d a ;*t o3 maths a"d the a))ro)r*ate data tell the truth. @ed*"*+ l*0e a lot o3 others+ s*m)l$ Aum)ed o" the 3ree )u;l*(*t$ 3rom th*s a"d tr*ed to use *t to h*s ad1a"ta#e+ same as Bo" Aum)*"# *" here s)out*"# (la*ms o3 a"t* &e"? *" h*s motor 'he" 'e 'ere d*s(uss*"# m*"e earl*er. :ther @ed*"* stu33 has mer*t ;ut th*s o"e *s Aust )la*" la(0 o3 u"dersta"d*"# 'h*(h ho)e3ull$ = ha1e (orre(ted here+ ;ut )lease do 3ollo' th*s u) $oursel1es a"d see 3or $oursel1es. Garry Stanley 4a;le."et."?

FromG k08epIe### &ateG Fri Feb D, 2000 7:00 am +u#jectG >edini and ,ssie Chargers m$ res lts# http:44gro ps#$ahoo#com4gro p4free6energ$4message47D)3

!* All+

(=/E8T0%E E&T

=" all m$ test us*"# a 0"o'" #ood ;atter$ o)erat*"# *" the 0-100C (har#e '*"do'+ = (a" 3*"d "o :D 'h*le us*"# )ulse (har#*"# su))l*ed ;$ a s*m)le lo' )o'er @ed*"* or :ss*e st$le (har#er.

= also 3*"d that the de1*(es do "ot (har#e 2 ;atter*es *" )arallel as 3ast as o"e de1*(e. 5he 1olta#e a"d 7). #ra1*t$ rate o3 (ha"#e *s hal1ed 'he" us*"# t'o ;atter*es o" the out)ut *" m$ test. =3 $ou destro$ a ;atter$ ;$ d*s(har#*"# *t ;elo' re(omme"ded le1els do'" to ?ero 1olts (a(tuall$ ;elo' 0C) a"d ma0e a se(o"dar$ ;atter$ a(t as a )r*mar$ ;atter$+ $ou '*ll 3or 3e' ($(les a))ear to ha1e a small amou"t o3 :D. =" the lo"# ru" a3ter 3- ($(les+ $ou e"d u) '*th a ;oat a"(hor a"d "o use3ul )o'er. 5he o"l$ eE(ess )o'er *s 3rom the ;atter$+ as *t *s d$*"# N:5 3rom the (har#er. =" a -da$ test o3 ($(l*"# the ;atter*es 3rom *")ut to out)ut e1er$ 24 hours+ the 3*"al out(ome 'as alread$ a))are"t. = had )la""ed a 7da$ test ;ut term*"ated *t *" da$s 'he" = a((*de"tall$ ;le' the (har#er 5r*a( (dam" test leads+ sha0$ 3*"#ers). 5he test 'as s*m)l$ ru""*"# o"e ;atter$ *"to a"other throu#h a" :ss*e 5ur;o 3or 24 hours a"d the" re1ers*"# the ;atter*es. @:5! ;atter*es 'ere loos*"# a;solute (har#e sho'" ;$ 1olta#e ANB 7)e(*3*( 9ra1*t$ read*"#s. 5h*s *s the true test o3 a" :D ;atter$ t$)e s$stem. 5he ;atter*es are (har#ed o)e" loo) ;ut the" 3ed ;a(0 throu#hF*"to the s$stem lo"# term. A&& (al(ulat*o"s are do"e *" the ;atter*es. =3 the$ (har#e u)+ *t 'or0s+ *3 the$ do "o+ *t does "ot. =" m$ (ase+ *t d*d "ot. 5o sa$ other'*se *s to l*1e *" a 3a"tas$ 'orld. = am "ot sa$*"# that the Gs$stemsG do "ot 'or0+ = '*ll Aust sa$ that = 'as "ot a;le to #et them to 'or0. Ma$;e = do">t ha1e the ma#*(+ the GMoAoG. 5h*s *s 'hat = ha1e 3ou"d. =" m$ o)*"*o"+ the :ss*e 5ur;o a"d the @ed*"* sol*d state (*r(u*t are ;as*(all$ the same de1*(e. = ha1e a hu"(h Hoh" '*ll d*sa#ree. =3 he does+ = '*ll "ot ar#ue '*th h*m. = (a" s*m)l$ sa$ that ;oth (*r(u*ts sho' ama?*"#l$ s*m*lar results 'he" 3ed *"to 9::B ;atter*es.

A 3e' o;ser1at*o"s are *" order. At t*mes = had GmeasuredG 4:->s o3 1.7F1. = later 3ou"d that th*s 'as measureme"t errors. =t too0 a (ou)le o3 'ee0s to re3*"e the measureme"ts o3 (urre"t a"d 1olta#e ;oth *" a"d out o3 the (har#ers a"d the ;atter*es. Iou (a" N:5 use a meter o" the out)ut s*de o3 the (*r(u*ts to measure the out)ut (urre"t. 5he 3reJue"($ a"d 'a1e3orm *s "ot usa;le to a sta"dard BVM or Va"e t$)es meter. =")ut measureme"ts '*th a BVM measur*"# (urre"t *s (lose ;ut the" too+ there *s a" error due to the sJuare 'a1e "ature o3 the 'a1e3orm or (urre"t dra' o" the *")ut s*de. 5he most a((urate 'a$ to measure *")ut (urre"t *s a(ross a 1er$ small res*sta"(e (0.1 ohm+ (ar;o" res*stor) o" a s(o)e a"d the" (al(ulates )o'er dra' *" the (*r(u*t. :3 (ourse dut$ ($(le o3 the 'a1e3orms has to ;e ta0e" *"to a((ou"t. Ne'er d*#*tal s(o)es '*ll do *t 3or $ou. = do "ot ha1e the luEur$ o3 a -8K dollar s(o)e so = ha1e to use m$ '*ts a"d e$e;alls. B*s(har#*"# the ;atter$ *s 3a*rl$ s*m)le. A"$ 1-3 am) 78&LL ser*es

re#ulator (a" ;e )la(ed o" a heat s*"0 a"d '*th o"e res*stor ;e(ome a (o"sta"t (urre"t s*"0 de1*(e there;$ #*1*"# $ou a 1er$ a((urate )o'er dra*" o" the ;atter*es. :3 (ourse+ $ou (a">t dra*" the ;atter$ do'" to 0.0 1olts as to do that *s a "o '*" s*tuat*o"2 5h*s )rodu(es GBeadG @atter*es )erma"e"tl$. Iou must a((e)t the 3a(t that th*s st$le o3 e"er#$ de1*(e does N: 'or0. 5r$*"# to sa$ th*s de1*(e does 'or0 *s *"(orre(t. =3 *t *s do*"# 'or0+ *t has to ;e eEert*"# 3or(e o1er d*sta"(e a"d *t o;1*ousl$ *s N:5 'hat a sol*d state (*r(u*t does2 =t *s )rodu(*"# )o'er+ 'h*(h 4:D&B do 'or0 *3 a))l*ed to a me(ha"*(al de1*(e. =t has (urre"t #o*"# 3rom a ;atter$ *"to the (har#er a"d the" *"to a ;atter$. 5h*s *s s*m)l$ (al(ulated *" /A557+ *" or out. Normall$ 'e (al(ulate th*s *" 'att-hours. 5o o)e" u) the "um;ers 'e (a" (o"1ert the 'atts *" or out o3 the de1*(e *"to H:D&67 'he" used *" the (orre(t de3*"*t*o" o3 Houles as used *" a d*ss*)at*1e (*r(u*t. /here 1 'att (-M6=) eJual 1 HouleFse(o"dF 360 HoulesFm*" or 3600 HoulesFhour. = am sure others '*ll du)l*(ate these (*r(u*ts. 5he o"l$ testFresults = '*ll a((e)t as #e"u*"e *s the lo"#-term 2-;atter$ test as des(r*;ed a;o1e. =3 *t does "ot (o"t*"ue to ru" *"de3*"*tel$+ *t *s ;o#us. =t meets all the (r*ter*a o3 a" o)e" loo) s$stem a"d also tests the total )o'er )rodu(ed *" that s$stem. =t *s s*m)l$ a Gsel3G test 3or :D2 =3 the s$stems are (reat*"# real )o'er+ *t '*ll ru" 3ore1er. =3 the tem)orar$ eE(ess )o'er *s *" the (hem*(al e33e(t o3 the ;atter$ d$*"#+ the" *t '*ll "ot. 5hat *s all. -erso"all$+ = '*ll sa$ that the a;o1e *s "ot 'hat = had ho)ed to 3*"d. = reall$ 'a"ted to ;el*e1e. =t *s a real do'"er 3or me r*#ht "o'. <ra(0at$ <ra(0at$ <,a(0at$2 :" to the As)de" -ate"t2 Ben K4ZEP

32)/ BE&1/1$+ C)044E/GE T2 ER1C 9R1EG

Disclaime1F !he opinions and 3ie4s a1e not necessa1il6 those o0 #a1lan Sande1s

FateA (ri& !6 .an /##3 !$A/!A// 0#%## E1ic7 Fo you not have anything better do with you time& it must be fun to have everybody just hate you for what you are. The truth of the matter is you have never done any wor- on any of these

systems. Jou claim to -now what your tal-ing about& but do not. >ere is my challenge to you& go pull my patents ma-e the machine& by yourself no person helping you 'e8cept you' do not change a thing because you thin- it's better. Then dis0prove my patent as to why it does not woras < say. >ere is your chance 'big boy' disprove the batteries and what is going on in the machine. <'m saying you do not have the s-ills to do this and must get some 'lac-ey' to do the wor- for you. 7ets see if your degree is worth the power to blow it up. Jou have opened your big mouth& now it's time to do some real wor-& this is just to save your ass you must understand. < built the machine in one day& from winding the coils to the machine wor-& should < give you 5 days. < will post this so everybody can read this.Jou have your challenge big mouth let's see what you got. >ow should < say this& your the fraud and can't do the wor-. 2fter 5 days all is <'m going to do is come down on you li-e a fly on shit& Huild the machine dis0prove me. *eanwhile <'m going to tal- about you behind your bac-& just li-e you do to others. ?hen you fail bring the money to me and it will cost you K!#.### just for lessons on how to wor-& and we are not tal-ing about paper wor-. Ta-e pictures of 'JDQ' doing the wor- with you own hands. Dr you loose!!. The time has come to prove who you are and if you -now anything. <f you can't do the wor- then just come out and say your an asshole who just wants something for nothing. Huy the way you must spend your own money to do this. 7et's see if you can recover anything with your machine. Then you can pay to learn how to do it since you do not understand what it is. John

FateA *on& /5 Dct /##4 //A5#A!/ 0#4## #a1lan7 This is really lameN .ohn is trying to change the issue from my offer of K!#&### for proof by him 0 to destracting people on an accusation that < couldn't get his device to wor-. < don't thin- < or anyone could get his device to wor-. There is no problem with me getting viable designs to wor-. < have already recieved more than ! million dollars 9adjusted for present value: from the different companies < have wor-ed for in the past 1uarter century. 7ately < have done very well with a device that retransmits a microwave signal over fiber optics. 3hil may be caustic& but he's designed a lot of products out there running /4/6 all around the world too. <f < thought a given free energy system would wor-& maybe <'d try. Hut (+ people fre1uently have the audacity to as- me to get their designs to wor-. < don't -now whether that e8pectation is more far fetched than the design. < have tried to offer .ohn a chance to respond to the following article from someone else that < have mirrored at www.phact.org/e/;/bedini.htm .ohn made threats about it& but never really offered a rebuttal. >ow long has .ohn been wor-ing on what we call free energy and what is the best here and now evidence of something significant that he or school girls can offer for it= E1ic L1ieg

Bedini

im!le

cience "air motor # $%&$'&$$

Than*s to 3ohn Bedini %or sharing this in%ormation, more in%o will #e added as he can ro"ide it. 0 17 !ear old girl #uilds a science %air roject that a e%%icient. ears to #e unusuall!

1(o stills from the video sho(ing the motor r nning from a single /"+C transistor batter$ and r nning a generator that lights the L7+ on top# & diagram of the motor sho(ing the magnets bet(een t(o c$linders (hich apparentl$ are forced to spin (hen the coil at the bottom p lses and (here the coil at the top generates c rrent to drive the L7+# Looking at the pict re, it appears the shaft of the (heel is driven b$ a slot car t$pe motor that is driven b$ the batter$# &s the (heel rotates, the magnets bet(een the discs ind ce c rrent in (hat looks like a coil on the bottom (hich recharges the batter$MMM &nd another coil on top (hich lights the L7+MMM ?orr$, I don@t have the e%act circ it diagram $et b t .ohn (ill pdate (hen he gets a chance# ?ome of the ribbons and a(ards (on b$ this ama8ingl$ simple highl$ efficient science fair demonstration motor# If the motor is a 1#Cvdc slot car motor, the$ easil$ dra( from 200 milliamps 2300 mill(atts5 to C00 millamps 27C0 milli(atts5# 0000 rpm (ith this kind of po(er sage sho ld ',G-&LL= drain that /"+C batter$ in a co ple of ho rs# .ohn sa$s this circ it ran for C da$s 2120 ho rsSS5 on the single /vdc batter$, that is ama8ing and the girl sho ld be congrat lated for demonstrating it to (in the science fair a(ards# 1his file (ill be pdated either (ith a UGL pointing to the circ it on .ohns (ebpage or pdated (ithin this doc ment#

1his batter$ (as meas red b$ the science teacher before the motor (as t rned on and it meas red )#/ volts# 1hese batteries are s all$ 000 millamps batteries for one ho r, 1he motor (as r nning on 22 millamps at 0000 rpm# 9hen p lling the generator load the c rrent dra( on the batter$ (ent do(n to 13#2 millampsT 2look for the all 'orth *ole -otor in the notes5this is the same motor that an$bod$ can find in the lab notes on -$ page# It@s like I have said all along these motors (hen b ilt like I have said not changing an$thing have no problem doing this, is (h$ .err$ I co ld (in $o r contest an$time I have a motor setting on the same batteries for 12 $ears at -$ shop# .err$ don@t take -$ (ord for this, (rite 1homas >earden and ask him (hat the batteries looked like (hen the$ fell o t of the machine in front of him and then ask (h$ the motor kept speeding p (ile it (as r nning nder load# I (ill make $o a -*! of this motor if $o (ant it# I have al(a$s given all the information o t on these motors and !6Fields, e%cept $o (ill find that people al(a$s change things before st d$ing the res lts# I have been doing these motors for a ver$ long time, In m$ life I have fo nd the ans(er to getting res lts and this is (ith the school kids beca se the$ do not change things and the$ learn, (ile the others change things# .err$ if people (o ld A st b ild it the (a$ the inventor said get the res lts the inventor claimed, and then make improvements (e (o ld beenerg$ efficient right no(# . st (ait till !&? goes p to B2#C0 a gallon letUs see (hat happens#

.ohn .ohn co rteo sl$ sent this cool diagram on 03420400, of the motor the 10 $ear old b ilt and he gave me permission to post it, it is so clear that I decided not to redra( it# If $o choose to b ild this ver$ simple motor, please share $o r tho ghts and e%periences (ith s and4or (ith .ohn, tho gh (e@ll certainl$ pass an$ inp t on to him in appreciation for his sharing it#

.ohn sent another diagram sho(ing the transistor and arrangement to clarif$ : estions posted at the ;eel$'et Interact disc ssion list

L1 is an -*?)0// bipolar transistor or a 2'30CC transistor, 10ohm resistor, 1'/10 diode# .ohn also (rote that he c ts (elding rods into the length of the coil form, then inserts them into the center hole aro nd (hich the (ire is (rapped to form the coil, this increases the magnetic fl % as an @iron@ core transformer#

E' is an

Dohn Be%ini
"rom 0ESWiki

2ump toD navigation, search

2ohn )edini

2ohn )edini

%ome people play the piano by music, others play by ear, and some can do both. The talents are different. Dohn Be%ini has a natural ability with electronics. 'e does not work from a circuit diagram, though he knows how to read them and compose them. $or him, the positioning and balancing of components comes as naturally as one who is gifted at playing the piano by ear. 'e can "compose on the fly." 'e has a natural feel for what diodes to use with what capacitors and transistors and transformers? what they do, and how they interact. 'e has worked with these building blocks, even making the from scratch for years. 'is original and persisting fame has come in the world of audio e#uipment. 'is )edini sound systems are still used in the professional recording industry. Three5= sound, the ability to convey high fidelity on junk wires, digital sound with the #uality of analogue, and more.
.ontents
LhideM

1# 2# 3#
!harge

9&ikola Tesla B!onferences ;.roduct in arketD 8enaissance

0# 1# 2# 3# 0#

E.atents E.9U%.F9<:AF9 E.BU%.AAFFF;< E.;U%.ACECEEE E.EU%.A;:B;F<

C# D# 7# )# C# D# 7# )# /# 10# 1# 2# 11#

E.CU%.CFEKFEC E.AU%CEKF<CF E.FU%CEAEEEB E.KU%CECCCF:C C7ebsites A/ideos F.roject .ages K0nterviews :Theory 9<!overage 9<.90n the &ews 9<.B=irectories 99%ee also

&ikola Tesla
2ohn )edini*s devices such as the %choolgirl motor, the onopole )attery Energi,er, etc, apply 8adiant Energy Technology, by generating Unidirectional 7ave 0mpulses. There is talk of enormous 'igh /oltage %pikes, but without current. ( brief perusal of gathered comments from 2ohn )edini yields that he calls this 8eactive .ower 5 something that has to be transformed into actual energy. ( capacitor always features in his designs, to convert this 8eactive .ower to useful electricity. Triggering mechanisms 3for timing4 and tuning are very crucial also. Tuning into resonance of the rotor Y trigger so that maximum benefit is reached. )edini also likes to use the rotation of some of his battery chargers to also spin a larger fan 3)edini onopole Energi,er4 to provide mechanical work also.

!onferences

9.
EventsRElectromagneticRDohn Be%ini G .eter +indemannR

Be%ini will $e at Nov! +4&+? technical conference 5 2eane

anning writesD

".eter +indemann will reveal motor secrets, 2eff 7ilson is said to have a machine that runs itself as well as charges itself? and there will be other speakers too.... There will also be a )ig %urprise event. 0Zll try to blog right away afterward. =uring the event, no cellphones or cameras are allowed, we*re told." 3Changing<ower? 1ctober B;, B<9< 4

9.
EventsR8adiant EnergyRDohn Be%iniRB<9< !onferenceR

Be%ini conference report 5 %anford %taab gives his review of the recent conference in %andpoint, 0daho announcing the new "Tesla %witch" which is a power amplifier for solar panels, that lets you improve the efficiency of your solar panels by up to Bx? as well as the other inventions of 2ohn )edini, including the ;5 and 9<5pole monopole motors. 30anford>s $log? (pr. 9E, B<9<4

9.
$eatured G EventsD 8adiantRElectromagneticRBe%iniR

Tesla Switch Solar .harger to %e$ t at Be%ini conference 5 The (pril 9< event in northern 0daho will feature a new Tesla switch that enables the batteries in a solar array to last much longer, while also enabling more energy to be drawn from the solar panel system. The 8enaissance !hargers and 9<5coil Energi,er kits will also be demonstrated. 3<*08? $eb. 99, B<9<4 3Comments-

.roduct in

arketD 8enaissance !harge

0n B<<F 2ohn )edini began limited distribution of a line of battery chargers and rejuvenators 3same product4, which both charge batteries using much less energy than traditional chargers, as well as restores sulfated batteries to near new

condition. 0n &ov. B<<K, he began increasing the marketing for these devices which have been performing well.
1# 2# 3#

httpDGG85!harge.com httpDGGEnergenx.com =irectoryD8enaissance !harge =evice by Energenx

.atents
&ote that )edini has stated that he is forced by the patent office to employ the term ")ack E $" even though the device does not even utili,e )ackE $ at all. 'e is using high voltage radiant energy spikes to electrochemically re5charge batteries. f.ex. 0f you understand this further, please clarify.

LS0N+,85N+
=,,5 & Septem$er & +8 & LS0N+,85N+ & <evice an% metho% of a $ack E6" permanent electromagnetic motor generator 9. This invention is a back E $ permanent electromagnetic motor generator and method using a regauging process for capturing available electromagnetic energy in the system. The device is comprised of a rotor with magnets of the same polarity? a timing wheel in apposition to a magnetic 'all Effect pickup switch semiconductor? and a stator comprised of two bars connected by a permanent magnet with magneti,ed pole pieces at one end of each bar. There are input and output coils created by wrapping each bar with a conducting material such as copper wire. Energy from the output coils is transferred to a recovery rectifier or diode. The magnets of the rotor, which is located on a shaft along with the timing wheel, are in apposition to the magneti,ed pole pieces of the two bars. The invention works through a process of regauging, that is, the flux fields created by the coils is collapsed because of a reversal of the magnetic field in the magneti,ed pole pieces thus allowing the capture of available back E $ energy. (dditional available energy may be captured and used to re5energi,e the battery, andGor sent in another direction to be used as work. (s an alternative, the available back E $ energy may be dissipated into the system. 9. 0nventorsD )edini? 2ohn !. 3!oeur d*(lene, 0=4, (ssigneeD Energenx, 0nc. 3.ost $alls, 0=4, $iledD arch BA, B<<B

LS055NNN4,
=,,? & Dan ary & +4 & LS055NNN4, & <evice an% metho% for p lse charging a $attery an% for %riving other %evices with a p lse

9. ( two5phase solid5state battery charger can receive input energy from a variety of sources including (! current, a battery, a =! generator, a =!5to5=! inverter, solar cells or any other compatible source of input energy. .hase 0 is the charge phase and phase 00 the discharge phase wherein a signal or current passes through a dual timing switch that controls independently two channels dividing the two phases. The dual timing switch is controlled by a logic chip or pulse width modulator. ( potential charge is allowed to build up in a capacitor bank, the capacitor bank is then disconnected from the energy input source and then pulse charged at high voltage into the battery to receive the charge. The momentary disconnection of the capacitor from the input energy source allows for a free5floating potential charge in the capacitor. 1nce the capacitor has completed discharging the potential charge into the battery, the capacitor disconnects from the battery and re5 connects to the energy source thus completing the two5phase cycle. 9. 0nventorsD )edini? 2ohn !. 3!oeur d*(lene, 0=4, (ssigneeD Energenx, 0nc. 3!oeur d*(lene, 0=4, $iledD =ecember B9, B<<9

LS051?1???
=,,4 & April & > & LS051?1??? & <evice an% metho% for tili2ing a monopole motor to create $ack E6" to charge $atteries 9. ( back E $ monopole motor and method using a rotor containing magnets all of the same polarity and in a monopole condition when in momentary apposition with a magneti,ed pole piece of a stator having the same polarity, said stator comprised of a coil with three windingsD a power5coil winding, a trigger5coil winding, and a recovery5coil winding. The back E $ energy is rectified using a high voltage bridge, which transfers the back E $ energy to a high voltage capacitor for storage in a recovery battery. The stored energy can then be discharged across the recovery battery through the means of a contact rotor switch for further storage. 9. 0nventorsD )edini? 2ohn !. 3!oeur d*(lene, 0=4, (ssigneeD )edini Technology, 0nc. 3!oeur =*(lene, 0=4, $iledD arch 9;, B<<9

LS0548=4N,
=,,= & 6ay & =+ & LS0548=4N, & <evice an% metho% of a $ack E6" permanent electromagnetic motor generator 9. This invention is a back E $ permanent electromagnetic motor generator and method using a regauging process for capturing available electromagnetic energy in the system. The device is comprised of a rotor with magnets of the same polarity? a timing wheel in apposition to a magnetic 'all Effect pickup switch semiconductor?

and a stator comprised of two bars connected by a permanent magnet with magneti,ed pole pieces at one end of each bar. There are input and output coils created by wrapping each bar with a conducting material such as copper wire. Energy from the output coils is transferred to a recovery rectifier or diode. The magnets of the rotor, which is located on a shaft along with the timing wheel, are in apposition to the magneti,ed pole pieces of the two bars. The invention works through a process of regauging, that is, the flux fields created by the coils is collapsed because of a reversal of the magnetic field in the magneti,ed pole pieces thus allowing the capture of available back E . energy. (dditional available energy may be captured and used to re5energi,e the battery, andGor sent in another direction to be used as work. (s an alternative, the available back E $ energy may be dissipated into the system. 9. 0nventorsD )edini? 2ohn !. 3!oeur d*(lene, 0=4, (ssigneeD )edini Technology, 0nc. 3!oeur d*(lene, 0=4, $iledD 2anuary 9;, B<<<

LS01N?>N?1
+88> & 6ay & 1 & LS01N?>N?1 & Analog vector processor an% metho% for pro% cing a $ina ral signal 9. (n analog vector processor and method for converting right and left mono and stereo audio input signals through a series of six amplifier blocks and two control blocks using a series of uni#ue signal path connections. The six amplifier blocks are comprised of three dual5amplifiers, two spacial amplifiers, a four5amplifier integrated circuit that inverts and transposes the signal path thus putting the signals out5of5phase. The two control blocks are comprised of a new and uni#ue signal mixer control block that selects a mono, stereo, spacial or binaural signal, and a level control block for dual tracking of the signals. The resultant output signals are of an altered sound field producing a binaural effect thus creating a three5dimensional sound experience. The input signals may be from any sound source or conducting medium. 9. 0nventorsD )edini? 2ohn !. 3!oeur d*(lene, 0=4, (ssigneeD )edini Electronics, 0nc. 3!oeur d*(lene, 0=4, $iledD $ebruary BA, 9::A

LS1?>N,1N
+885 & Dan ary & =4 & LS01?>N,1N & Apparat s an% metho% for re% cing electronic relaxation noise present information recor%ing me%i m 9. ( method and apparatus is provided for reducing relaxation noise in a conducting medium. The device is fabricated by affixing two magnets at like,

repelling poles? wrapping said magnets with a coil of wire in an orientation orthogonal to the interface between the joined magnets and the like poles of the magnets to form a magnetic unit? connecting said coil to a motor means, an electrical power supply means and a switch means? attaching a spindle to said motor means. The spindle receives said conducting medium. The apparatus can be in a housing. The conducting medium is placed on said spindle. )y activating the device, a modulated magnetic electromagnetic field is created simultaneous to the spinning of the conducting medium. The information recording medium rotates through the modulated electromagnetic field, thereby reducing the relaxation noise. 9. 0nventorsD )edini? 2ohn !. 3!oeur d*(lene, 0=4, (ssigneeD )edini Electronics, 0nc. 3!oeur d*(lene, 0=4, $iledD 2une BB, 9::E

LS1?5???=
+8>N & "e$r ary & +N & LS01?5???= & Anti&copy system (n anti5copy system which prevents copying of tapes and records and other source material by placing a degrade signal on an analog source signal to be recorded on a recording device. 1ne embodiment of the system includes a pulse width modulation 3.7 4 circuit that generates a pulsed signal in a fre#uency range from near the upper end to well above the range of hearing. The .7 pulsed signal is modulated by the source signal to be recorded. The .7 signal becomes the degrade signal. This degrade signal is keyed so that it is combined with the source signal only when the fre#uency of the source signal exceeds a desired threshold. The combined source signal and degrade signal are recorded on the original recording. This original recording can be played back without the presence of the degrade signal impacting the audible #uality of the reproduced source signal. 'owever, attempts to make taped copies of the original recordings cause the degrade signal to beat against the bias oscillator fre#uency of the tape recording head, thereby creating harmonic signals that result in distortion and noticeable alteration of the reproduced source signal that are unpleasant and objectionable to the listener. The anti5copy system may be used with stereophonic recordings, monophonic recordings, or even digital recordings of the type wherein an audible tone burst is used to represent desired digital data.
1#

9. 0nventorsD )edini? 2ohn !. 3%ylmar, !(4, (ssigneeD T/0 %ystems, +td. 3+os (ngeles, !(4, $iledD 2une BE, 9:K;

LS1?111N81

+8>1 & Novem$er & =5 & LS0?111N81 & 6ona ral to $ina ral a %io processor 9. (n audio processor which converts monaural input to a realistic pleasant sounding binaural output in which optical coupling means, having a nonlinear transfer characteristic, creates an unbalanced output to a pair of audio outputs. The system provides for a high or low level input, which may be selected by a switch, to an emitter follower which drives an optical coupling circuit. The optical coupling circuit is comprised of a light emitting diode and a phototransistor connected in a phase splitting network. The phase splitting network provides an unbalanced output to terminals for connecting to preamplifiers, amplifiers, etc. (n alternative embodiment employs two optical coupling circuits in two separate signal processing channels, including two phase splitting networks. 9. 0nventorsD)edini? 2ohn !. 3%ylmar, !(4, (ssigneeDT/0 %ystems, +td. 3+os (ngeles, !(4, $iledD 2uly B9, 9:K;

7ebsites
1# 2#

httpDGGenergenx.com httpDGGwww.icehouse.netGjohn;EG 5 2ohn*s official website. httpDGGwww.icehouse.netGjohn9Gstubblefield.html 5 2ohn*s site on &athan %tubblefield 3magnetic induction amplifierSearth battery4 Y ground radio

1# 2#

httpDGGwww.bedini.comG 5 8egarding 2ohn*s audio work

7ikipediaD)ediniN(udioN%pectralNEnhancer 5 7ikipedia article regarding the 2ohn )edini (udio %pectral Enhancer 3).(.%.E. 3see monoaural to binaural patent4
1#

2ohn )edini

aster list of 2ohn )edini*s 7ebsites

/ideos

9.
8adiant Energy REnergy from the /acuum seriesR

The .e;ka "iles && <K< n m$er =, in the CEnergy from the Kac mC series 5 +ike Dohn Be%ini, 2ohn !ejka had been an electrical prodigy from an early age. 'e also had an encyclopedic knowledge of the Vfree energyW

scene[not only its history, but also its secret technologies, its inventors and its pioneers. (nd he had the documentation to support this prodigious knowledge. =ocumentation that was not available to the general publicD and insights that were clearly privileged. 3C< *nergy? %ept. C, B<9<4

9.
agnet otorsR'oward 2ohnsonR

Be%ini 0osts Ki%eo of 3owar% DohnsonEs <evices 5 Dohn Be%ini and 8ick $riedrick post a video showing 'oward 2ohnson*s linear track magnet train and original magnet motor that 2ohn has in his possession, received from '2 years ago. 'e addresses the video to ylow to encourage him in his efforts to carry on the work of the late '.2. 3Dou ube? ay 9C, B<<:4

New CEnergy from the Kac mC <oc mentary Series <K< release & Dohn Be%ini 5 )edini conducts a tour of his lab and explains how every motor works, in addition to patiently answering a whole host of #uestions pertaining to *radiant energy*.
1#

9.
$eaturedD /ideosR

Energy from the Kac m series 5 .arts 95:, now available, feature Tom )earden as well as 2ohn )edini, 7alter 8osenthal, =eborah !hung, 'oward

2ohnson, .eter +indemann, =aniel %heehan, %parky %weet, and T 'enry oray. "Even a tiny efficiency of tapping Lspace energyM could and will extract all the energy anyone could wish." 3<*0)iki? arch 9C, B<<:4

.roject .ages

Self&r nning Be%ini motor 5 +ong5time participant in various )edini motor replication projects, 8ick $riedrich posts videos, photos, diagrams, and explanation of his set5up, which he says measures a net gain in energy "from nature".
1# 1# 1#

Be%ini School Pirl .irc it an% 6otor

Dohn Be%iniEs posts to the SP pro;ect list 3pdf4 5 !ompiled by 8on .ugh. ;; posts, 9C pages. Tesla*s radiant energy, battery behavior, %weet /T(, -ron theory. 3(pril BC, B<<C4

0nterviews
(pril Ath, B<<K, %ky eadow edia 5 %erving the &ew Energy %ince B<<9 interview with 2ohn )edini
1# 2#

ovement

%eptember Ath, B<<A, 2eff 8ense interview with 2ohn )edini on 8oyal 8aymond 8ife

Theory
1#
agnet otorsR ylowR1%D @+17DTheoryR

6ylowEs gate 5 "0 have explained that the switching is very important and you must understand that first. 0 don*t care how many magnets you glue on that disc it*s not going to work until you understand the switch and where the energy is coming from." 55 2ohn )edini 3+ylowE+agmo? ay 9C, B<<: 99DCF am ountain4

!overage
0n the &ews

9.
$eatured G )est Exotic $ED Electromagnetic G EventsRB<99R &E7D )edini !onferencesR

Early Registration 0romotion of Lpcoming D ly =,++ Be%ini .onference 5 8ick $riedrich is offering several incentives for early
registration to the 2uly B:5;9, B<99 conference to be held in 0daho, U%(. The unspoken promise in this series of )edini conferences is that eventually, working, commercial overunity devices of increasing #uality and capability will emerge from this process. 3<*0)iki? =ecember BE, B<9<4

9.
$eaturedD Electromagnetic G EventsRB<9<R)edini !onferenceR

Wiseman calls Be%ini 4&pole kit revol tionary 5 "The little ;5pole kit
they are selling is going to revolutioni,e (merica. 0t allows grassroots experimentation so that people can get a working understanding of the principles that allow $ree Energy to be gathered." 3<*0)iki? =ecember K, B<9<4

9.
$eaturedD Electromagnetic G EventsRB<9<R)edini !onferenceR

Be%ini Renaissance .onference marks t rning point in over nity electromagnetic research 5 The enthusiastic chatter about the )edini
!onference describes a monumental event with ama,ing demonstrations of technologies and networking of people who previously have only known

each other by usernames. 7hat came to be called the ")edini $erris 7heel" was unveiled, drawing milliamps while producing tremendous tor#ue and electricity. 3<*08? &ovember B;, B<9<4

9.
EventsD Electromagnetic G 8adiant EnergyR

Renaissance .onference Novem$er +4&+?# =,+, 5 ( 7orkshop giving people a chance to spend time at the shop with 2ohn )edini and others of like5mind in actual assembly of his cutting edge energy technology, including the 85!harge battery chargers, )ediniG!ole magnetic window motor energi,ers, and electric vehicle conversions. "This may be more significant than the *KE Tesla %ymposium." 55 8ick $riedrich 3F#Charge? %ept. B<9<4

9.
$eaturedD ElectromagneticRBe%iniR

PA0 0ower magnetic amplification an% ne trali2ation ill strates rega ging 5 (rt .orter has posted a video series that demonstrates what 2ohn )edini calls "regauging", a principle involved in being able to replicate some of Tesla*s later work. 3<*08? $eb. B<, B<9<4 3!omments4

9.
$eaturedD 8adiantRElectromagneticRBe%iniR

Be%ini on /scillator vs! Tesla Switch 5 "The 1scillator can work down to

voltages of <.F tenths of a volt, so it can charge in very low light 55 no magic except in the conversion here? just good engineering..." /ideos show analogue meters and oscilloscope readouts of the input 3;.K amps4 versus output 3K.C amps4. 3<*08? $eb. 9E, B<9<4 3!omments4

9.
$eatured G EventsD 8adiantRElectromagneticRBe%iniR

Tesla Switch Solar .harger to %e$ t at Be%ini conference 5 The (pril 9< event in northern 0daho will feature a new Tesla switch that enables the batteries in a solar array to last much longer, while also enabling more energy to be drawn from the solar panel system. The 8enaissance !hargers and 9<5coil Energi,er kits will also be demonstrated. 3<*08? $eb. 99, B<9<4 3Comments-

9.
$eaturedD ElectromagneticRBe%iniR

Be%ini +,&coil energi2er kits now availa$le 5 Tony !raddock has posted a new infomercial video about the 9<5coil energi,er kit being manufactured by 8ick $riedrich. Their purpose is to educate about Tesla*s radiant energy technology, especially pertaining to its desirable effect on batteries, to rejuvenate them and charge them with much less input electricity re#uired. 3<*08? $eb. :, B<9<4 3!omments4

9.
$eaturedD ElectromagneticRBe%ini G %teornR

Is SteornEs e&/r$o a copy of Be%iniEs monopoleO 5 )edini associate, 8ick $riedrich, says he wishes people would give due credit when they consult and then copy 2ohn )edini*s technology. "%teorn not only copied my ; pole monopole kit, ...with a few different unessential parts configurations, but they even had the nerve to call it the classic>" %ays %teorn*s demonstrations are not very convincing. 3<*08? 2an. 9;, B<9<4

9.
Top 9<< G $eatured G $E&D )atteriesR!hargersR85!hargeR

Interview with Dohn Be%ini a$o t his Renaissance .harger that Re; venates Batteries Lsing Tesla Technology 5 )edini talks about what Tesla*s radiant energy is, and how he is using some of those principles in a device that he*s had available for limited distribution for 9.C years but is now marketing more widely. 3<*08? &ov. B<, B<<K4 ythbusters $umbles )edini 5 =ecember B<<E Disco!ery Channel program debunking free energy included a replication of one of 2ohn*s motors. They didn*t even have magnets on the flywheel. 8ead 2ohn )edini*s comment.
1#

=irectories
1# 2#

7ikipediaD2ohn )edini

httpDGGwww.aionalchemy.com 5 (ion (lchemy focuses on radiant energy and the replication of the )edini patents.

%ee also

1# 2# 3# 0# C#

=irectoryD2ohn )edini .ower.ediaD8adiant Energy =irectoryD8enaissance !harge =evice by Energenx .ower.ediaD.eter +indemann

2ohn and .eter*s !oaching 5 0ndex created to keep track of the various coaching comments 2ohn )edini and his associate, .eter +indemann, have provided for the )edini %6 project. 5 .ower.edia main index 5 .E%7iki home page 8etrieved from "httpDGGpeswiki.comGindex.phpG.ower.ediaD2ohnN)edini" !ategoriesD 2ohn )edini \ 8adiant Energy

Be%ini SPHAssem$ly Instr ctions

"rom 0ESWiki
2ump toD navigation, search Ao are hereH.E% &etworkR.E%7ikiR=irectoryR)edini %chool 6irlR (ssembly 0nstructions

Assembly +nstructions *or ,ohn "edini-s .School #irl Radiant 'nergy Circuit and %otor. The materials list is complete, as is the schematic page. !ombined with the following information, enough information is presented to replicate the design. %everal people now have successfully replicated this device.
.ontents
LhideM

1# 1# 2# 3# 0# C# D# 1# 7# )#
)ank

9(ssembly 9.9)uilding the $rame 9.B$astening agnets to 7heel

9.;7inding the !oils 9.E$illing !ore 9.C%oldering the !ircuit 9.A)attery Tips 9.A.9!onnecting the )atteries 9.F(djusting 8esistance 9.K1ne 9&E<<F to Each )attery in

2# 1# 3# 0#

B0nstruction (dditions B.97ednesday, =ec. BB, B<<E ;!autions E%ee also

(ssembly
)uilding the $rame
9. %tand needs to have stability front5back, left5right. B. 8otor shouldn*t have much resistance in its turning, and needs to be made of non5magnetic material. ;. .lan for ]9GK inch gap or less between the coil spool and the wheel with magnets glued and taped. E. $rame material should be non5magnetic, but some metal can be present.

C. @ou may want to be able to increase or decrease the distance between the wheel and the spool, for experimental variable purposes. A. =irection of rotation does not have to be perpendicular to coil, but can be at :< degrees as well.

$astening

agnets to 7heel

Use a compass to determine "&" the north end of your magnets. The Earth*s &orth .ole is magnetically south, so the "north" end of your compass will be attracted to the "south" end of your magnet. 3ref4 &orth faces out 55 toward the coil.
1#

B. ;.

+abel your magnets. (ll magnets face the same direction 3north out4.

E. agnet spacing does not need to be uniform unless you are going to attempt more than one coil. C. =etermine an e#ual spacing for the magnets about the perimeter of the wheel and mark where they should go. This is not crucial to proper operation with one coil, but if you want to later add more coils 3each with a separate circuit4, symmetrical spacing will be important for symmetrical firing. 0f your wheel diameter is more or less than the ]BE inches called in these plans, adjust the number of magnets accordingly to be within the same range of spacing between magnets. @ou don*t want to get your magnets much closer than 9.C 5 B widths apart. A. 0f you wish to use more than one coil, each coil will need it*s own complete circuit. (ll coils will need to fire in unison, so the magnet spacing will need to be uniform. %pacing between magnets should not be less than 9.C 5 B magnet widths 3whichever way you have them oriented4. F. Use super glue andGor tape 3or rubber bands, or ...4 to affix the magnets.

7inding the !oils

"$ill the spool." (pproximately EC< :<< turns. 9. 7ind the two wires on the coil together.

B. 0t is very important that the two wires be next to each other the entire distance of the winding. ;. (rrangement of the winding is not crucial. There is no pattern re#uired. %ymmetry is not re#uired. Think fishing spool or kite spool, and you*ll be fine. The window of tolerance is very wide here. E. @ou might use a drill to spin the spool. ( chordless drill generally can turn slower, making it easier to count turns and to make sure the two wires are wound parallel the whole distance.

C. 2ohn says the Exact number of turns on the coil is not crucial. !lose is ade#uate. The window of tolerance is #uite wide here. 'owever, an exact count will be necessary for scientific rigor in documenting and reproducing. A. Tips !ounting visually is nerve5wracking and prone to error. Use an audible trigger in winding 3e.g. a clacker on the spool4. (lternatively, you might affix tape to both ends of spool, protruding outward around 9GB inch. This will hit your hand as the spool turns, helping you to count turns. -eep track of input output pairs.

$illing !ore
9. )e sure to have the side that will be facing the magnets flush with the top of the spool so you can spin your magnets close to the spool without hitting a rod in the core. B. @ou might drill a 9" inch hole in your base around 9GB inch deep for the other side of the core to protrude into, so you don*t have to cut your rods short. ;. E. Use glue on each rod to keep it from moving. Tap the last few rods in with some light object until you can*t fit any more.

%oldering the !ircuit

9. B. Try to keep all wires as short as possible. =on*t overheat your diodes, resistor, or transistor when soldering.

;. 0f you don*t know how to solder, you could use wire nuts or even nutsGbolts to secure your connections. E. ake sure the circuit works before soldering the connections. (lligator clips can be be used to hold things in place until you solidify them. C. ( little :5/ battery can be used to test the circuit. 3%terling*s suggestion4

A. 2ohn keeps the wires in his circuit as short as possible, going nearly to the #uick when fastening his diodes to the transistor. The circuit will work with the wires being longer, but he says it works better when they are short. F. (lso, be sure to use a heavy guage wire when connecting your batteries in parallel or series.

)attery Tips

9. 0n functional application, you should not draw power from the same battery that is presently being charged. @ou should have one bank of batteries under charge, and another for discharge, and then switch between them.
2#

%ee )attery !haracteristics

.onnecting the Batteries

1nce your system is confirmed running, you will want to beef up your connections to optimi,e the effect. Use a heavy guage wire and terminal connectors with crimping. The above photo shows a set5up for rotation of batteries from the back end to the front, allowing for single battery charging 3fresh from the front4 while that battery comes up the same voltage as the bank of batteries, so they can then be connected in parallel.

(djusting 8esistance
%terling uses the following set5up to adjust the resistance on the circuit. &ote that the arrangement includes a switch to enable meter readings without extended disconnection of the circuit. =epending on how responsive the meter is, the circuit is interrupted for maybe one or two seconds using this method.

The BC 1hm resistors give a fine5tuning capability. The bread board enables hard resistor plug5in to the appropriate range desired. The Ck 1hm potentiometer enables a wide berth of tuning. &ote, the Ck ohm potentiometer tends to be unstable in how it holds the resistance. 0f you wish to lock into a particular resistance, you should consider hard wiring the hard resistors into the bread board and bypassing the Cpotentiometer.

1ne 9&E<<F to Each )attery in )ank

=ec. :, B<<E httpDGGgroups.yahoo.comGgroupG)ediniN%6GmessageGE;9 .eter and 2ohn recommend that we set up our 9DE battery arrangement as followsD 0 rpose to isolate each of the batteries in the back5end charging bank. 6etho% in addition to the 9&E<<F diode coming from the circuit to the batteries positive terminal, branch off to each battery with a 9&E<<F diode so that they see the circuit independently. Note

'arlan tried omitting the diode coming from the circuit, just using one going to each battery, and that did not work. Ramifications 9. B. the worst battery in the set does not become the weak link in the chain. no need to stop the circuit when rotating batteries

;. no need to have the bank standing idle discharging while the battery from the input comes up to charge E. when the input battery discharges, the battery with the highest charge from the bank 3not necessarily the one that has been there the longest4, can be brought to the front end to run the circuit There is another trick that 2ohn will disclose to us in due time.

0nstruction (dditions
We%nes%ay# <ec! ==# =,,?
Tuning Tips 5 2ohn gives several tips on how to optimi,e the )edini %6, from how to tune in the base resistor, to wire gauge modifications. 'e would like to see us get to the point that we can run a C<< 7 inverter.
1#

=oesn*t work for %terling 5 0 implemented most of 2ohn )edini*s recent suggestions. =oes not reveal over unity, though the solid state test looked at first like it was going to. 32an. ;, B<<E4
1#

!autions
!(UT01&% 5 =angers associated with this project are mainly with the batteries, but also with wheel rotation and soldering. )e sure you understand the risks and that you take necessary precautions.
1#

B. 7hile this design can deliver some good shocks, they are not of a dangerous level. ;. 0f the neon bulb is not in place, the transistor is likely to burn out if the device is run without a receptacle for the radiant energy 3e.g. a receiving battery4. The neon bulb absorbs the excess output energy and serves similar to a shock absorber or fuse 3though nothing is "tripped" and has to be reset4.

%ee also

1# 2#

1perating 0nstructions

2ohn and .eter*s !oaching 5 0ndex created to keep track of the various coaching comments 2ohn )edini and his associate, .eter +indemann, have provided.
3# 0# C# D#

aterials +ist %chematic 8eplications (ssembly /ariations 5 8eturn to %chool 6irl 8adiant Energy !ircuit and 5 1ther =irectory +istings 5 .E%7iki main page otor

8etrieved from "httpDGGpeswiki.comGindex.phpG=irectoryD)ediniN%6D(ssemblyN0 nstructions" !ategoriesD 2ohn )edini \ 8adiant Energy \ !hargers \ !ircuits \ %chool 6irl otor otors \ )attery