Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

(More on) Popularity Feb.

12, 2007
Throughout the ages, there have been those who betrayed the church - like
Judas, for which body of true believers didn't have a few of their own? But there
were also those whom the church betrayed. Paul, for example, was a classical
case, of an outcast of the very early church - the one we deem the purest - who,
because of his different way, doubtlessly his former hostility, never really was full
accepted by the original early church in Jerusalem, in spite of the fact (or was it
even because of it?) that he was the first to truly fulfill Jesus' call and
commandment to go into all the world (not just Judea and surroundings), prach
the gospel to every creature (not just the Jews) and make disciples of all nations.
Of course, the list would become endless if we were to follow up throughout
history and count those who were betrayed and forsaken by their own church for
various reasons, because they wouldn't fit in. Some, like Luther, simply started
their own movement, outside of the confines of the old. Others, like Father
Damien, the leper priest of Hawaii, lived with their fate (and their church) until
they died - some martyrs at the hands of their own brothers and sisters, cursed in
their lifetimes and declared saints post-mortum.
How is it that most of the true prophets, like Isaiah, Jeremiah, Moses, David and
even the Messiah Himself, had to suffer persecution, disdain and contempt from
their own people, their own brethren?
It must be that popularity - in God's eyes, even popularity among His own people,
must really not be where it's at. It must really be so, as Paul said, that "All who
would live godly (piously) in Christ Jesus must suffer persecution," and that, quite
often, at the hands of their very own people.
Some had their temporary bouts and phases of popularity, but when the final
crunch came, they were either thrown in dungeons, chased out of town, or
crucified.
Amazingly, we observe this shocking lack of acceptance of genius not only in the
field of religion, but in the arts as well, if you look at the lives of such great
composers as Mozart or Haendel.
Haendel, as a German in England, got hell from the established church of his day
for his attempts to put the gospel to music and make it accessible for the
common people. He lived most of his life on the verge of poverty and had to go to
Ireland for his works to be heard.
We all know that Mozart never lived to enjoy his popularity.
So, then, the price of real anointing seems to be that you hardly ever get to enjoy
the credit for it in this life... Maybe that is what ensures that what you've got will
also remain true anointing? Maybe it is to make sure that the credit goes to the
One Who gives the anointing in the first place...
In any case, it seems - contrary to all we ever thought and wished to think - that
popularity isn't necessarily any proof for quality nor genuine talent or spirituality. It
rather seems like the opposite.

Вам также может понравиться