0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
23 просмотров10 страниц
Graph coloring takes its name from the map coloring application, we assign labels to vertices. When the
numerical value of the labels is unimportant, we call them colors to indicate that, they may be elements of any set. In graph
theory, a connected component of an undirected graph is a sub graph in which any two vertices are connected to each other
by paths. The rainbow connection number of a connected graph is the minimum number of colors needed to color its
edges, so that every pair of its vertices is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are colored the same.
In this paper we show that the rainbow connection number of an interval graph, which are of the form the rainbow
connection number is equal to the radius of the graph G plus three.
Оригинальное название
TO FIND THE COMPARISON OF THE RADIUS WITH THE RAINBOW CONNECTION
NUMBER OF INTERVAL GRAPHS
Graph coloring takes its name from the map coloring application, we assign labels to vertices. When the
numerical value of the labels is unimportant, we call them colors to indicate that, they may be elements of any set. In graph
theory, a connected component of an undirected graph is a sub graph in which any two vertices are connected to each other
by paths. The rainbow connection number of a connected graph is the minimum number of colors needed to color its
edges, so that every pair of its vertices is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are colored the same.
In this paper we show that the rainbow connection number of an interval graph, which are of the form the rainbow
connection number is equal to the radius of the graph G plus three.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Graph coloring takes its name from the map coloring application, we assign labels to vertices. When the
numerical value of the labels is unimportant, we call them colors to indicate that, they may be elements of any set. In graph
theory, a connected component of an undirected graph is a sub graph in which any two vertices are connected to each other
by paths. The rainbow connection number of a connected graph is the minimum number of colors needed to color its
edges, so that every pair of its vertices is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are colored the same.
In this paper we show that the rainbow connection number of an interval graph, which are of the form the rainbow
connection number is equal to the radius of the graph G plus three.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
TO FIND THE COMPARISON OF THE RADIUS WITH THE RAINBOW CONNECTION NUMBER OF INTERVAL GRAPHS A. SUDHAKARAIAH, E. GNANA DEEPIKA, V. RAMA LATHA & T. VENKATAESWARLU Department of Mathematics, S. V. University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
ABSTRACT Graph coloring takes its name from the map coloring application, we assign labels to vertices. When the numerical value of the labels is unimportant, we call them colors to indicate that, they may be elements of any set. In graph theory, a connected component of an undirected graph is a sub graph in which any two vertices are connected to each other by paths. The rainbow connection number of a connected graph is the minimum number of colors needed to color its edges, so that every pair of its vertices is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are colored the same. In this paper we show that the rainbow connection number of an interval graph, which are of the form the rainbow connection number is equal to the radius of the graph G plus three. KEYWORDS: Radius, Eccentricity, Interval Graph, Rainbow Connection Number, Rainbow Path INTRODUCTION A Graph ( , ) G V E = is an interval graph, if the vertex set V can be put into one-to-one correspondence with a set of intervals I on the real line R , such that two vertices are adjacent in G if and only if their corresponding intervals have non-empty intersection. The set I is called an interval representation of G and G is referred to as the intersection graph . I The intervals 1 2 { , ,....., } n I i i i = be an interval family, where each i i is an interval on the real line and [ , ] i i i i a b = for 1, 2,....., , i n = here i a is called left end point labeling and i b is the right end point labeling of i i . Without loss of generality we assume that all end points of the interval in I are distinct numbers between 1 and 2n. Two intervals i and j are said to be intersect each other if they have non-empty intersection. An edge color of a graph is a function from its edge set to the set of natural numbers. A path in an edge colored graph with no two edges sharing the same color is called a Rainbow Path. An edge colored graph is said to be rainbow connected if every pair of vertices is connected by at least one rainbow path, such a color is called a rainbow color of the graph. The minimum number of colors required to a connected graph is called its rainbow connection number [1, 2, 5], denoted by ( ). rc G In graph theory, the rainbow connection number of a complete graph is one, that of a path is its length, that of an even cycle is its diameter. The radius of a graph G is the minimum of eccentricity of all its vertices and is denoted by rad(G) [3] that is rad(G)=min{eec(V):VeV(G)}, where the maximum distance from a vertex u to any vertex of G is called eccentricity of the vertex v and is denoted by ( ), ecc v that is ( ) max{ ( , ) : ( )}, ecc v d u v u V G = e where as the distance between two vertices u and v of a graph is the length of the shortest path between them and is denoted by ( , ) G d u v or ( , ) d u v . To the rainbow colored graph it is enough to ensure that every edge of some spanning tree in the graph gets a distinct color. Hence it is an interval graph with minimum degree ( ) G o [4] is two and the radius rad (G).
54 A. Sudhakaraiah, E. Gnana Deepika, V. Rama Latha & T. Venkataeswarlu MAIN THEOREMS Theorem Let 1 2 { , ,....., } n I i i i = be an interval family and G is an interval graph with ( ) 2 G o > corresponding to I. If i and j are any two intervals in I such that 1 j = , i
is a dominating interval and j is contained in i , there is at least one interval i l = to the left of j that intersects j or i and there is at least two intervals one is k i = to the right of j that intersects j or i and another interval is the another dominated interval which intersects i only then the rainbow connection number . 3 ) ( ) ( + = G rad G rc Proof Let 1 2 { , ,....., } n I i i i = be an interval family and G is an interval graph with ( ) 2 G o > corresponding to I. If i and j are any two intervals in I such that 1 j = , i
is a dominating interval and j is contained in i , there is at least one interval i l = to the left of j that intersects j or i and there is at least two intervals one is k i = to the right of j that intersects j or i and another interval is the another dominated interval which intersects i only. Of course the dominated interval i contains the interval j, then the intervals l and k must intersects the dominated interval i. If we assign the colors to the edges in the corresponding interval graph G, then we get the rainbow connection number rc(G), it must be greater than the minimum value of the distances of every pair of vertices in the corresponding interval graph G, then rc(G) = rad(G)+3. If the intervals l and k both are not intersecting the interval j but not i and another interval which is to the right of j excluding k, i.e., the dominated interval which is to the right of j still intersects the interval i only then there is no change in the number of intervals which are intersecting the dominated interval i. So, the rainbow connection number and the minimum value of the distances of every pair of vertices remain same. Then in this case also rc(G) = rad(G)+3. This can be verified in the following interval family clearly. Consider the following Interval family I as follows,
Figure 1: Interval Family I As a contradiction, let us suppose that, there is no interval l i to the left of j that intersects j and to the right of j there is no another dominated interval which intersects i, then the corresponding interval family is as follows,
Figure 2: Interval Family I In this interval family we can easily see that rc (G) < rad (G)+3. Hence our assumption that, there is no interval l i to the left of j that intersect j and to the right of j, there is no another dominated interval which intersect i is wrong. So, if i and j are any two intervals in I such that j i, i is a 1 4 7 10 2 6 8 3 5 9 1 4 7 10 2 6 8 3 5 9 To Find the Comparison of the Radius with the Rainbow Connection Number of Interval Graphs 55 dominated interval and j is contained in i, there is aatleast one interval l i to the left of j that intersects j or i and there is atleast two intervals one is k i to the right of j that intersects j or i and another interval is the another dominated interval which intersects i only, then rc(G) = rad(G)+3, which can be shown in the following illustration clearly. Now, consider the following interval family I as follows,
. I If i and j are two intervals in I such that i 1, i is a dominated interval and j = 1, j is contained in i , if there are one or two intervals intersecting to the right of the interval j, then the rainbow connection number, rc(G) = rad(G)+3. Proof Let 1 2 { , ,....., } n I i i i = be an interval family and G is an interval graph with ( ) 2 G o > corresponding to
. I If i and j are two intervals in I such that i 1, i is a dominated interval and j = 1, j is contained in i . Suppose assume that there is no interval other than i that intersects to the right of j then we get a contradiction as the distance from the interval i To Find the Comparison of the Radius with the Rainbow Connection Number of Interval Graphs 57 +3 to the interval j = 1 is large, then rad(G) +3 must be greater than the rainbow connection rc(G). Hence if j = 1, j is contained in the dominated interval i then there must be one or two intervals excluding the dominated interval i. If j 1 and j is contained in the dominated interval i, then it is enough only one interval k other than i to the right of j that intersects j. Then we get rc(G) = rad(G)+3. This can be easily shown in the following illustration clearly. Consider the following Interval family I,
Figure 4: Interval Family I The corresponding neighborhoods of each vertex from the above interval family I are as follows, nbd [ 1 ] = {1,2,3,4}, nbd [ 2 ] = {1,2,3,4}, nbd [ 3 ] ={1,2,3,4,5}, nbd [ 4 ] = {1,2,3,4,5}, nbd[ 5 ]={3,4,5,6,7}, nbd[6] = {5,6,7,8}, nbd[7]={5,6,7,8,9,10}, nbd[8]={6,7,8,9,10}, nbd[9]={7,8,9,10}, nbd[10]={7,8,9,10}. In this regard the rainbow edge colors of G
Figure 5: Interval Family I Clearly we can see that rc(G) < rad(G)+3. Hence our assumption that, there is no interval other than i that intersects to the right of j = 1 is wrong. So, if i and j are any two intervals in I such that i 1, i is a dominated interval and j = 1, j is contained in i , if there are one or two intervals intersecting to the right of the interval j, then the rainbow connection number, rc(G) = rad(G)+3. 1 4 7 10 2 6 8 3 5 9 To Find the Comparison of the Radius with the Rainbow Connection Number of Interval Graphs 59 Theorem Let 1 2 { , ,....., } n I i i i = be an interval family and G is an interval graph with ( ) 2 G o > corresponding to . I If k j i , , are three consecutive intervals such that k j i < < and j is a dominated interval, i intersects j , j intersect k and i intersect k and if j is the last dominated interval, then i must intersects k+1, then the rainbow connection number, rc(G) = rad(G)+3. Proof Let 1 2 { , ,....., } n I i i i = be an interval family and G is an interval graph with ( ) 2 G o > corresponding to . I If k j i , , are three consecutive intervals such that k j i < < and j is a dominated interval, i intersects j , j intersect k and i intersect k , to prove the equality rc(G) = rad(G)+3, it is necessary that the last dominated interval i.e., if j is the last dominated interval, then i must intersects the interval k+1. As a contradiction, let us assume that, if j is the last dominated interval and the interval i does not intersects the interval k+1. Then the rainbow connection number will be decreases and the minimum value of eccentricities of all vertices will be increases. Thus we get the inequality as rc(G) < rad(G)+3, which is a contradiction to the equality rc(G) = rad(G)+3. This can be proved with the following illustration.Consider the following interval family I as follows, . Figure 6: Interval Family I In this interval family we can easily seen that rc(G) = 4 and rad(G) = 3, it leads to a contradiction that rc(G) < rad(G)+3. Hence our assumption that, if j is the last dominated interval and the interval i does not intersects the interval k+1 is wrong. If i, j, k are three consecutive intervals such that i<j<k and j is the dominated interval, i intersects j, j intersects k and i intersects k and if j is the last dominated interval then i must intersects k+1 then the rainbow connection number, rc(G) = rad(G)+3. For this consider the following interval family,