BenedictyTowards An Intellectual History of Possession Reading La Crise As A Textual Space in Vodou and Andre Breton's Haitian Lectures and Nadja

Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses
http://sir.sagepub.com/ Towards an Intellectual History of Possession: Reading ''la crise'' as a Textual Space in Vodou and Andr Breton's Haitian Lectures and Nadja
Alessandra Benedicty Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 2012 41: 280 originally published online 1 May 2012 DOI: 10.1177/0008429812440974 The online version of this article can be found at: http://sir.sagepub.com/content/41/2/280 Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
The Canadian Corporation for Studies in Religion
Additional services and information for Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses can be found at: Email Alerts: http://sir.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://sir.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://sir.sagepub.com/content/41/2/280.refs.html
Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012
>> Version of Record - Jun 12, 2012 OnlineFirst Version of Record - May 1, 2012 What is This?
Towards an Intellectual History of Possession: Reading la crise as a Textual Space in Vodou and Andre Bretons Haitian Lectures and Nadja
Alessandra Benedicty
Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2) 280305 The Author(s) / Le(s) auteur(s), 2012 Reprints and permission/ Reproduction et permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0008429812440974 sr.sagepub.com
Bretons Haitian Abstract: This article focuses mainly on what are known as Andre Conferences (19451946) and his 1928 novel Nadja, along with the embedded topic of spirit possession in Haitian Vodou. My proposition is to show how both the vocabulary and the theory that come to be associated with what I will call the act of possession in Bretons work engages a reflection that accounts for fragmented notions of identity. I draw on anthropological theories of subjectivity to put the accent on the destabilizing experience of the contemporary, globalized human subject. To do so, I look at two aspects of Bretons writing: first, how both before and during his first contact with Haiti, he was interested in alternative states of being; and second, how these states related to the disintegration of identity. I will also consider possession, and its associated lexica, as an intellectual notion, a trope that appears in the discourse of European intellectuals during and after the World Wars. I compare it to the considerations of possession within the context of a Vodou Weltanschauung. rences quAndre Breton a sume : Cet article se propose dexplorer les confe Re es en Ha donne ti en 1945-1946 dune part, et son roman Nadja (1928) dans le cadre de la possession dans le Vaudou ha tien dautre part. Mon objectif est de montrer comment le orie associe s a ` ce que nous nommerons lacte de possession dans vocabulaire et la the flexion qui prend compte des notions de lidentite luvre de Breton implique une re
Corresponding author / Adresse de correspondance : Alessandra Benedicty, City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, United States Email: abenedicty@ccny.cuny.edu
Benedicty
281
` des the ories de la subjectivite qui mettent humaine contemporaine. Je ferai appel a rience de stabilisante du sujet humain mondialise . Deux aspects de laccent sur lexpe ressent particulie ` rement : premie ` rement, comment avant et luvre de Breton minte resse aux e tats desprit alternatifs ; pendant son premier contact avec Ha ti, il sest inte tats refle ` tent une de sinte gration de lunite identitaire. Partant du ensuite, comment ces e cho dans luvre de Breton dans le contexte postulat que la crise identitaire trouve un e dun Weltanschauung vaudou, je montrerai que la possession et son lexique constituent current dans le discours des intellectuels europe ens de lentre-deux guerres un trope re ` s guerre. et de lapre Keywords Vodou, Haiti, spirit possession, Breton, Surrealism s Mots cle alisme Vodou, Haiti, crise de possession, Breton, surre
Introduction
This article focuses mainly on what have come to be known as Andre Bretons Haitian Conferences1 and his 1928 novel Nadja, along with the embedded topic of spirit possession in Haitian Vodou. I will look closely at Bretons work in light of more recent scholarship, which includes: J. Michael Dash on the Surrealist Ethnographers; Irene o Biehl, Alberss work on Leiriss representations of Zar possession in Ethiopia; Joa Byron Good, and Arthur Kleinmans Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations, a compilation of essays on methods for contemporary anthropological observation (Rabinow, 2007: 107); and Terry Rey and Karen Richmans theoretical reconsiderations of syncretism in Haitian religion. Respectively, Dash and Albers examine the intersection between literary theory and ethnography in French writers who travelled to Martinique, Guadeloupe and Haiti.2 In his 2007 article entitled Le Je de lautre: Surrealist ethnographers and the Francophone Caribbean, Dash notes the lack of scholarship on the French intellectuals presence in the Caribbean:
While the impact of the Surrealist intellectuals exile in the U.S. is well documented, one would be hard put to find, even in French, a thoroughgoing examination of this period of the interaction between a French literary avant-garde and Caribbean writers. [ . . . ] When the Surrealists travel through the Caribbean is mentioned, the tendency is to concentrate exclusively on Andre Breton and generally ignore the passage of Surrealist dissidents such as Pierre Mabille, Michel Leiris, and Alfred Me traux, who inaugurated a form of writing that Glissant in 1956 calls a welcome combination of literature and ethnography. (Dash, 2007: 84)
Dash identifies and resurrects texts about which little has been written, or which have been largely ignored by contemporary scholarship; he re-inscribes them in the context
282
Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)
of more widely read work, such as Me trauxs ethnography of Vodou. As Dashs article indicates, there is a lack of understanding not only on the relationship between French and Caribbean intellectuals in the early twentieth century, but also on the relationship between ethnography and literature in the Caribbean intellectual context. Maryse Conde s 2001 article on Marxist poetics in the French Caribbean entitled Fous ten Depestre; Laisse dire Aragon points not only to the need for scholarship, but also to a certain negligence associated with such lacunae. Conde writes: The literary episode, which is the theme of this article, serves to illustrate the relations between French literature and francophone literature. They are at best, relationships of ignorance, of indifference (Conde , 2001: 177).3 Another backdrop for this article is recent scholarship that emphasizes an intimate even if not comfortablerelationship between European and Caribbean thought systems, a scholarship that offers insight into an instance of transatlantic dialogue that included the Caribbean, and more specifically Haiti. In political philosophy and intellectual history, Susan Buck-Morss, Sibylle Fischer, Nick Nesbitt, Valerie Kaussen, and David Scott explore the idea that Haiti, while not explicit in Enlightenment discourse, at least informed it. Buck-Morss writes: There are thus multiple, quite mundane reasons for Hegels silence [in regards to Haiti], from fear of political repercussions, to the impact of Napoleons victory, to the hazards of moving and personal uprootings. [ . . . ] But there is no doubt that Hegel and Haiti belong together (Buck-Morss, 2009: 20). In anthropology, meanwhile, Terry Rey and Karen Richman note that in the context of Haitian religion, by the time the African slaves had arrived in SaintDomingue, the European element had informed the African one; in other words, the worshiping practices of those Central Africans who became slaves destined for the Caribbean had undergone processes of hybridization, noting that [a]t the outbreak of the Haitian Revolution in 1791 (Rey and Richman, 2010: 384), most probably their religious practices had already undergone a Kongolese appropriation of Catholicisman Afro-Catholic synthesis (2010: 387). Similarly, in speaking of the notion of pwen in Vodou, they identify a European etymology: Pwen is based upon the French word point. Its French provenance is a reminder of the dynamic contribution of European magical knowledge and thought to Haitian religion, a contribution that scholars have generally overlooked in their quest to uncover African survivals (2010: 392). I cite the above examples of the points of contact between European, African, and Caribbean epistemologies to underline the interpenetration of thought systems, which serves as a backdrop to this essays consideration of the various iterations of the notion of possession as they appear in the French and Caribbean discourses of the early to mid-twentieth century. A final framework for this article addresses the relationship between subjectivity and traumatism. In his ruminations on Giorgio Agamben and the Spatialities of the Camp, Richard Ek suggests that as the camp4 as domiciliary reality imposes itself on humanity, replacing that of the city, so too displacement and desubjectification (2006: 363) create notions of identity that are better adapted to the reality of migration, and quasi-perpetual disarticulation. In this article, through the notion of possession, I explore Eks assertion and especially his conception of displacement and desubjectification, which link domiciliary displacement to the disintegration of identity. My proposition is to show how both the vocabulary and the theory that come to be associated with what I
Benedicty
283
will call the act of possession in Bretons work engage a reflection that accounts for Eks notion of identity, one that is based on movement rather than on origin, one that does not assume permanence, but accounts for frequent instability. To do so, I look at two aspects of his writing: how both before and during his first contact with Haiti, he was interested in alternative states of being; and second, how these alternative states related to desubjectification. I will also consider possession, and its associated lexica, as an intellectual notion, a trope that appears in the discourse of European intellectuals during the World Wars. I compare it to the considerations of possession within the context of a Vodou Weltanschauung, or what Claudine Michel describes as a global vision of the world (in Coates, 2006: 182). The disciplinary methodology that I will employ in my analysis of all the texts in this article will be literary. I also should note that my rereading of Bretons Haitian lectures drew me back to Nadja. The result surprised me. I realized that the Vodou cultural text might itself be a theoretical framework through which to reread Bretons novel. In his recent transcultural study of possession, Craig E. Stephenson advocates for the reconsideration of possession, not as a mental disorder, as it was designated in 1992 by the American Psychiatric Associations Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, but rather as a potential epistemological break, part of psychiatrys attempt to culturally contextualize its discourse and treatment models (Stephenson, 2009: 3, 7374). Stephenson asks: Could possession provide an idiom through which psychiatry might reflect upon and rectify its diagnostics? (2009: 74). Stephenson explains the intimacy, followed by the divorce, between psychology and anthropology:
At the Clark Conference in 1909, Franz Boas carefully manoeuvred anthropology away from the essentialist tendencies of psychology and psychoanalysis. A century later, in a similar manner, many Western anthropologists attempt in their writings to describe possession in non-Western settings without lending it a psychological description, because they find a tendency to pathologize inherent in psychological language. (Stephenson, 2009: 66)
Stephensons argument is that in the estranged couple that anthropology and psychology form, psychology would stand to gain from a renewed rapprochement with the social sciences. Acknowledging the extremely exoticizing and deprecating language that Carl Jung uses to describe possession (2009: 48), Stephenson re-examines Jungs work to extract from it Jungs interest in implementing possession as a methodology in Western psychoanalysis (2009: 118). That said, although Stephensons work has as its goal to recuperate a Jungian notion of possession, the role of Jungs work in his book is fairly marginal; rather, it is the concept of possessionaccounts of possessions in Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Europethat takes centre stage. If at the turn of the twentieth century, for psychologists, the primary site of study for the Selfs Other was analysis of the intimate psychic space of the human individual, and for the anthropologists, the Other constituted ethnographies of communities mostly outside of Euro-Canada, the EuroUnited States, or Europe, then Stephenson points to the fact that possession is a form that bridges both conceptions of othering, and at best has constantly troubled the disciplinary divide between psychology and anthropology:
284
I connect Jungs concept of possession explicitly to its etymology, to the forceful image of selfhood sitting in its own seat and of the suffering inherent when selfhood experiences itself unseated by something Other. (Stephenson, 2009: 34)
The historical context that Stephenson outlines with regard to European and North American scholars interest in possession emphasizes the fact that Western discourse is dually familiar and uncomfortable with the concept of possession. In a sense, this articles approach is to show how, on the one hand, Bretons work delineates rigid frontiers between the terms that form binaries such as religious/secular and city dweller/peasant (Breton, 1999b: 153); on the other hand, Bretons work is, as Erika Bourguignon points out, extremely at ease with the concepts associated with possession: The notion of possession, or spirit possession, appears to be so familiar to Americans that a definition seems hardly necessary (Bourguignon, 1991: 1). In other words, what is at stake is not whether or not the characteristics of possession2 exist in a given culture, but rather the names that the given group give to the phenomena associated with possession. Bourguignon writes:
This disagreement leads to the question of just what we might mean by abnormal or pathological, a difficult subject on which only limited agreement exists. We might begin by asking: Do the people among whom possession trance occurs consider it abnormal? Do they say the person who experiences such a state is crazy? Do they say, Something must be done about this so that he can go back to functioning like a normal person? [ . . . ] The answer must be that in some societies, under some circumstances, it is considered a bad thing to go into possession trance and something must be done about it. In other places, going into possession trance is considered a fine and desirable thing. (Bourguignon, 1991: 8)
Thus, this article meanders through various nodes of the transnational production of the concept of possession as it relates to Bretons work, Haitian Vodou, and contemporary theories on subjectivity.
A Historical Context: Rapture and Revolution in Bretons Haitian Lectures

In the following considerations of Bretons work within the context of his visit to Haiti, I propose that the concept of possession as considered by Bretons Surrealist aesthetics is one that not only points out affinities between Haitian and French thought systems, but also renders problematic the binary that posits the interiority of a bodys psychological space against the exteriority that underlies an individuals commitment to social action. It is important to emphasize the event that Bretons visit to Haiti represented, for it accompanied, if not catalysed, the overthrow of President Elie Lescots presidency, which took place within a month of Bretons visit. In an interview with Lucienne Serrano, Rene Depestre, one of the young Haitian poets, who was in Bretons entourage during the visit, explicitly explains how Bretons visit to Haiti was capital to both Breton and Depestre:
Benedicty
285
Such a creative effort had to engender a popular Surrealism, a phenomenon that surprised Breton, in 1945, at the moment of his time in Haiti. The founder of learned Surrealism, which resembled German Romanticism, discovered with joy that Surrealism was a historical given of the consciousness of all men. One could find it, in its religious forms, with the Haitians, for example. Such a discovery would delight Breton. I was a witness to his rapture: Breton, under our very eyes, learned that Surrealism could be lived on a daily basis by millions of human beings, and all the while the same frame of mind had been up until then a movement of European intellectuals. (Depestre, 1998: 144145)
Although in the quotation Depestre does not specify how Surrealism and Vodou relate to each other, he accounts for their similarity, as well as for the momentous occasion that Bretons visit represented. Bretons Haitian lectures may be found in the third volume of the French edition of his complete works, published by Gallimard in 1999. Marguerite Bonnet, the editor of the third volume, in collaboration with Etienne-Alain Hubert, Philippe Bernier, MarieClaire Dumas and Jose Pierre, provides extensive notes on the historical context in which Breton delivered the lectures in Haiti. I take this much time to point out the contribution of the notes to the reading of the lectures for they put in evidence three factors: first, the enthusiastic welcome and espousal of Bretons Surrealist poetics by Haitian poetactivists such as Depestre and Cle ment MagloireSaintAude; second, Bretons reciprocal enthusiasm in responding to the Haitian poets political engagement; and third, Bretons allusions to Vodou. The notes take the form of two short essays, which underscore the exaltation of Breton on the part of Haitian intellectuals and the youth, as well as Bretons reciprocal enthusiasm for the combination of aesthetics and revolutionary spirit that he witnessed amongst the Haitians with whom he came into contact during his trip (Bonnet, 1999: 12141219, 12271228). Breton arrived in Haiti on 4 December 1945, welcomed by Pierre Mabille, who, in Depestres words, was the Cultural Attache for free France, [who] had the pleasure of introducing his old friend (Bonnet, 1999: 1216). Especially of interest for our purposes is Bretons arrival speech, Speech at the Savoy Club of Port-au-Prince, delivered on 5 December 1945 and published immediately afterwards in a special edition of the Haitian poets literary magazine La Ruche (The Beehive), and the first of eleven planned conferences on poetry, of which only seven took place; the junta interrupted the schedule (Bonnet, 1999: 1217). The first lecture was entitled simply Surre alisme, and took place on 20 December 1945 as a public reading at the Rex Theatre in front of avant-garde intellectuals, and feverish youth (Bonnet, 1999: 12141215, 12171218, 1227). Bonnet explains that the publication of the first speech led to the Haitian governments seizure of the magazine and the imprisonment of certain of its editors, including Depestre, in turn provoking a student demonstration that led to the fall of President Lescot. I paraphrase Bonnet et al.s notes so as to emphasize a volatile context that informs Bretons re-articulation of Surrealist ethics and aesthetics before Haitian audiences. Bonnet quite explicitly suggests that Bretons first two public appearances in Haiti would have actively contributed to the political events. The notes send the reader to an October 1946 article with Jean Duche in which Breton explains that it is first and foremost the
286
misery, followed by the patience, of the Haitian people [which] were at their height, that led to the overthrow of the government (1999: 592). They also mention another 1946 interview with Jean Bedel entitled How without wanting it Andre Breton made a revolution in Haiti, which appeared in the literary journal La Minerve (Minerva) on 7 June 1946 (Bonnet, 1999: 1217). After the coup, for most of his trip Breton remained constrained to prudency, almost never leaving Pe tionville; and the tone and content of his talks became more and more didactic (Bonnet, 1999: 1218). That said, Bonnet is rather explicit in suggesting that at least at first, Breton might have seen his own interest in the instability of the Haitian social and political situation in 1945:
This first talk [ . . . ] took place in public, with its goal to restore to the image of Surrealism all of its dimensions, including its revolutionary aspects, as if to provide a relay to the intellectuals of Haiti. (Bonnet, 1999: 12271228)
Regardless of whether or not Breton saw the precariousness of the Haitian political situation as a means to realize the full political ambitions of his Surrealism, Bretons first public appearances in Haiti reveal that the French intellectual was delighted by the eager welcome of the young Haitians, and was deliberate in his consideration of Haitian Vodou in relation to Surrealism. Whether or not he performed a rhetorical enthusiasm to foment revolution is questionable; but the text of his conference on Surrealism reveals what Depestre characterizes as an enraptured response to Bretons exposure to Haitian Vodou.3
Surrealisms Unresolved Challenge

Given the contexts described above, Bretons discussion of the history of Surrealism as one at pains to resolve the disparity between ethics and aesthetics becomes relevant. I intentionally use short fragments of Bretons 20 December 1945 conference to summarize his ruminations on the evolution of Surrealist thought in the earlier decades of the 1900s. His words reflect a concern between the interiority and exteriority of human experience as it relates to the right of peoples to do for themselves (Breton, 1999b: 162). Speaking in Haiti in December 1945, Breton notes retrospectively that until 1925, Surrealism had still been in its intuitive stage. For it to enter its reasoning phase, it would need a particularly emotional traumatism, which would come in the form of Frances colonialist war against Morocco (1999b: 162), a war that would underscore the French governments disrespect of a citizens right to political self-determination (1999b: 162). It is dialectical materialism that becomes the tool by which Surrealism will find its reasoning phase, in which the avant-garde art movement will apply the non-conformism (1999b: 162) of experiments in alternative somatic states (1999b: 160) to a world outside of itself (1999b: 160). Breton hopes that experiments in the unconscious will find their articulation in Marxist politics. He believes that non-conformity, whether aesthetic or political, might bring together the bourgeois origins of most of the Surrealists with those French citizens of working class origins, thus allowing the artist and the proletariat to unite in their resistance against national egoisms (1999b: 160).
Benedicty
287
Breton manifestly scoffs at the almighty power of thought, regarded as capable of emancipating and freeing itself by its own means, a belief system which he finds very detrimental (1999b: 160). However, he also recognizes that the plunge of the lost body into the unconscious (1999b: 160), which characterizes one of the principal modalities by which Surrealism as a poetic then artistic movement (1999b: 154) operated, is too intimate, too affective an experience to be of social, and especially political, import:
The years that followed, in fact, the first World War, sanctioned by a treaty, in our eyes again accentuated the permanent disharmony and reinforced the causes of the conflict, and the Surrealist activity remained confined to its first theoretical givens. (Breton, 1999b: 162)
He finds contemptible the almighty power of thought, which inhibits the movement from finding a better way to bridge the gap between somatic non-conformitythat is, alternative explorations of the use of the human body and its psycheand collective, political non-conformity. Thus, the problematic that Breton puts forth in his lecture on Surrealism in Haiti is that of the disparity between Bretons fascination with Freuds methodologies (1999b: 156) and a Marxist dialectical materialism (1999b: 162). It is the conceptual chasm between the bodys psychical capacities and the individuals responsibility to a larger collective body that troubles Breton. Generally speaking, the recurring theme of Bretons talk is how the individualespecially the individual who is European or North Americancan deal personally, socially and politically, with the traumas of modernity, especially the dislocation of urban life and the violence of the World Wars:
The passer-by, always in a rush in big American or European cities, is in this way a perpetual dupe. He knows no longer from where he comes, and even less so, where he goes. He has everything to relearn from the Haitian peasant. (Breton, 1999b: 153)
In reflecting on the First World War, Breton wonders at how the human subject is left to deal with the disruption and disillusion where the first World War had left us, and the tabula rasa that it had rendered of the acknowledged values of our youth (1999b: 159). He begins his conference with the conclusion that the Haitian peasant has found a spiritual equilibrium of which the European or North American are devoid:
If we consider the human condition in Haiti under this angle in relationship to what it is in countries that consider themselves to be the avant-garde of all that is technical progress, I do not hesitate in thinking that it is on the side of the latter that spiritual misery and the most pressing of distresses resides. (Breton, 1999b: 152)
His deduction is based in a discussion of three belief systems to which he has been exposedChristianity, indigenous religions, and Vodou (1999b). So in a sense, what Breton does in his lecture on Surrealism is to re-examine the movement in the presence of Vodou as cultural system.
288
Surrealist Crisis4 and Vodou Possession

I will now turn to Bretons treatment of the moment of possession in Vodou ritual as he has observed it, and his comparison of the Vodouisant moment of possession to the avant-garde practices of 1919 in which he and his friends participated:
[ . . . ] crises, otherwise known as nervous phenomena created by autosuggestion, which a certain number of my friends presented in rapid succession, by the simple contagious effect that one person, who played the initiatory role, had on several of my friends. These bouts of possession, which I managed to observe with some regularity, night after night over several months, took as their stage my apartment in Paris. (Breton, 1999b: 158)
Breton is intent on distinguishing his Surrealist experimentation from possession in Vodou:

It goes without saying that at least in its genesis, the observed crises differed fundamentally from the Haitian crises of the loa. Devoid of any religious foundation, it took place in a strictly experimental context. (Breton, 1999b: 159)
Bretons discourse is at best exoticizing, and at worst condescending, a point that will be discussed later. For the moment, I am interested in how Bretons comments on Vodou possession fit into a broader intellectual history. Given the fact that Breton deliberately couches his discussion of Surrealism within the context of an explicit scepticism about religion, or rather cultsfor he calls both Vodou and Christianity cults (1999b: 152)he is nonetheless at pains to dissimulate his fascination with Vodou possession. The attitude of which Breton speaks in the citation below is that which offers up the plunge of the lost body into the unconscious as a means of relief from the psychological grief that a period of extreme intellectual and moral disarray entailed (1999b: 160):
I so obstinately clung to this attitude that it provided the conclusion of the book: Nadja, published in 1928 [ . . . ] I like to think that Haiti [like a jewel] is set5 like no other place in the world: Beauty will be convulsive or will not be at all. Hypnotic sleep also confirmed the idea that mental automatism, far from being a trap, is the ideal means by which we may act upon life through the intermediary of language, that this language be oral or written, graphic language, just as that of song or dance. The Verb, if it has been placed at the beginning, must maintain the power to recreate everything. (Breton, 1999b: 160)
Part of Bretons enchantment with both the crise in Surrealism and possession in Vodou is that they provide a physiological processing of trauma. Ellen Corins work on trauma explores the ex-centricity of the subject: she proposes that [w]hatever the context, narratives suggest that something rises from within the subjects experience and destabilizes it, shaking the lived world at its roots (Corin, 2007: 273). In extremely
Benedicty
289
different contexts, what Breton observes in both forms of convulsive somatic behaviour is an aesthetics that enables the desubjectified subject to represent the trauma of its psychic displacement. Breton writes:
That said, I am far from wanting to mark any superiority in favour of that which livened up, in a strongly disorganized way, the small group that we formed. I insist that it is in and of itself significant, if not to say heraldic, that at that time, in our dispositions of spirit and of heart, in the dire state of despair in which the first World War had left us [ . . . ] we were able to rediscover the gesture, which for centuries had elevated the Haitian peasant beyond slavery and the overwhelming reason that would have made it seem that all was lost. (Breton, 1999b: 159)
Although Breton does not directly compare the hopelessness of his group of friends during the First World War to the despair incurred by the slave trade and slavery, his text does recognize that the gesture of the young French mens crise has been preserved throughout the generations in Haiti.6 As I have already noted, Dash traces the writing process of the Surrealist ethnographers, with particular interest in how a sense of instability plays itself out in their works. For example, in the case of Bretons Martinique charmeuse de serpents, he notes selfdoubt and anxiety in the effort to produce a stable travel narrative (Dash, 2007: 87). While Bretons privileged displacement as a member of an elite class (to which he hints both in the above quotation and in his aforementioned self-identification as a nonworker [Breton, 1999b: 162]), and the modesty associated with his desire not to convey a sense of superiority, may be questionable, there is nonetheless legitimacy to his argument that crise and possession serve to process a traumatic event.
`t Te `t Nadja as Me
In an effort to further excavate Bretons own admission in his first Haitian conference that possession in Haitian Vodou is exceptionally similar to the convulsive beauty of his 1928 novel Nadja, I read Nadja solely in light of scholarship on Haitian Vodou. Leslie G. Desmangles writes:
te that, in spite of the remoteness of his permanent home, Possession indicates to the socie the loa is also one who comforts his serviteurs in the anxieties and the defeats of their lives and that, at the root of the cosmos, goodness always endures. Even with their poverty, their hunger, their failures, peasants know that they are rewarded by the cosmic power of the loas, who are capable of bestowing on their serviteurs the hope of a bright future. The intimate relationship that a possessed serviteur establishes with a loa through the mediation of the `ve `s accords him many benefits. The loa who mounts a serviteur soothes his particular ve fears and helps him in his personal losses. (Desmangles, 2006: 47)
In a sense, the argument could be made that the narrative instance of Nadja, the `t te `t, for as Max G. eponymous muse of Bretons novel, is the male narrators lwa me Beauvoir points out:
290
Possession by the lwa most commonly occurs during Vodoun ceremonies; but it may also take place at any timeespecially in stressful situations. Furthermore, a frequent type of possession is associated with the sleep state. Recognized as a valid and legitimate form of cultural expression, possession is seen as a way to free the individual inhibitions and frustrations; it acts as a psychic outlet. (Beauvoir, 2006: 129)
Thus, using Vodou cosmology as a theoretical lens, it could be argued that Nadja is the `t te `t, or the opposite, that the narrator of the novel is Nadjas me `t te `t, that narrators me they alternately possess each other. In his 20 December 1945 conference on Surrealism, Breton refers to possessions in Europe prior to the seventeenth century (Breton, 1999b: 151). Stephensons exploration of possession as a Jungian construct of the psyche suggests that in the century leading up to the Loudun possessions in France in the 1630s, [a]s the body became the target of diabolical attack, the terms possession and obsession which had been used almost synonymously, diverged in meaning. [ . . . ] Hence, an obsessive spirit was thought to assail, haunt, harass a person from the outside, while a possessing spirit was considered to have taken up residence inside the body [ . . . ] (Stephenson, 2009: 14). In this regard it is interesting to note that Rene Descartes was born sixty kilometres east of Loudun at La Haye in 1596, although [b]y the time of the possessions of Loudun, he was living in permanent and peripatetic exile in the Netherlands (2009: 17). Stephenson argues that Descartess thought privileged reason as a means to dominate any outside influence that may invade the space of reason. Bretons stance, as we have seen, is not necessarily the opposite, but rather privileges the concept that reason is by no means an all-powerful tool, that possibly the flight of reason in the moment of la criseof possession might have beneficial repercussions for the human subject, who has little or no control over the assault of such mass human traumas as slavery or world war. Nadja was written before Bretons visit to Haiti. The novel unfolds in three movementsor at least, there are two full-page breaks that visually create for the reader three distinct parts. The first part constructs imagery around vision (the word eyes is mentioned on almost every page of the first part) and sleep, or Nap Period (Breton, 1960: 31); in addition, the narrator names alternative somatic states such as the hallucinatory image of the words in question (1960: 27); he describes a situation in which he begin[s] corresponding with Paul Eluard, whom I did not know by sight (1960: 27); he describes psychoanalysis, a method I respect and whose present aims I consider nothing less than the expulsion of man from himself, and of which I expect other exploits than those of a bouncer (1960: 24). It is on the last page of the first of the three parts of the text that the narrator fully introduces Nadja: Nadjas appearance on the scene is an event related to the narrators own self-exploration (Breton, 1960: 69; 1964: 60). Her name appears earlier on when the narrator refers to Nadja as a text: (Could it have been otherwise, once I decided to write Nadja?) (Breton, 1964: 23). In the second part, the narrator describes his rapture with Nadja, his rendezvous with her, her fickle behaviour and her final disappearance. When present, Nadja and narrator, whom at one point she names Andre ?, share such an intimate psychic space that they become a we so powerful that they are convinced of the inevitability that they will leave behind them physical proof of their encounter. It is at this point that she implores him
Benedicty
291
to write a novel about her, about them (Breton, 1964: 117, 100). He describes her withdrawals from his presence as a whirlwind (Breton, 1964: 136; 1960: 114), and she acknowledges that in the end, for him she will only be a trace, yet a trace whose resonance remains for the narrator so grand (Breton, 1964: 137; 1960: 115). Throughout the novel, various narrative voices intertwine: that of a narrator fully conscious of his experience with Nadja and trying in hindsight to make sense of it, the voice of a narrator fully enthralled by Nadja, and other voices including those of the narrative instances of Rrose Se lavy, Robert Desnos (Breton, 1960: 31), Fanny Beznos (1960: 55), and even Rimbaud as representing the extremely deep and vivid emotion (1960: 51).7 In the third part, the narrator makes sense of his encounter with Nadja: he explains that despite his rapture for her, they had never really got along (1960: 157). Due to the eccentricities in which it seems she had indulged herself in the hallways of her hotel, she had been interned in an asylum (1960: 136). Thus, in a sense, the novel may be described as an incantatory ritualin which the first and third parts lead the narrator in and out of his crise, his possession. That said, it could also be argued that the narrator goes in and out of the states of crisis, for the narrative voice of consciousness returns frequently enough in the second part to dismiss the possibility that the entire second part represents a written trace of the crise. Both the first and third parts use vocabulary related to theatre: the narrator goes to the The a tre Moderne (Breton, 1964: 43); he speaks to its director (1964: 51); at the end, he is disappointed by the The a tre Modernes work (1964: 177); he refers to the opening, closing and reclosing of the The a tre des Deux-Masques/The a tre du Masque (1964: 180); and finally, he describes his encounter with Nadja as [a] short interval negligible for a hurried reader and even for any other, but, I must say, enormous and priceless for me (Breton, 1960: 148). Karen McCarthy Brown describes the theatrical aspect of possession, which both Bretons novel and Vodou ritual share:
Once the spirit is in charge of the horse, the crescendo of energy stops and people settle in to watch the possession performance. The term possession performance is not used here to indicate that there is anything false or contrived about these visits from the spirits. Vodou priest and priestess alike condemn the occasional person in their midst who may pran poz, act disingenuously as if possessed. The term is used rather to indicate what has often been noticed about possession in the Vodou temple: it has a theatrical quality. (McCarthy Brown, 2006: 13)
In a similar vein, Irene Alberss work looks at one of Bretons contemporaries, and someone with whom he collaborated in the early days of Surrealism. In her article entitled Mimesis and alterity: Michel Leiriss ethnography and poetics of spirit possession, she discusses liberation, theatricality, and spirit possession as they relate to Leiriss ethnographic work on Zar possession in Ethiopia in the 1930s. It is also important to indicate Leiriss connection to Haiti in that he visited Alfred Me traux there in 1948 (Dash, 2007: 91). She writes:
Re-enacting the Other leads to a liberation from its power by means of imitation. It is shown that this corresponds to Leiriss own retrospective studies of the zar cult as a cathartic
292
externalization of alterity and as a theatre of alterity. [ . . . ] In Leiris, the conjuring (as well as the therapy) becomes a literary domain, whereas the banishment of the phantom is the domain of theory or research. Talking as one who is possessed and talking about possession, inseparably linked in the diary, are associated with discourses of autobiographical self-description and ethnographic description of otherness, of expe rience poe tique and e tude ethnologique. (Albers, 2008: 271)
vi-Strauss, Anthropology and Aesthetics (2007: 23), Boris Wiseman likewise In Le underscores the interpenetration of scholarly disciplines to describe Leiriss work as theatrical:
My point is not to reduce one experience to the other, but to enlarge the context in which we view each, and reintegrate the aesthetic phenomenon that is a theatrical performance into a broader network of interconnected experiences, sometimes seemingly far from aesthetics. By the same token, one may view the shamanistic cure as a form of lived theatre, to borrow a phrase coined by Michel Leiris to describe Ethiopian ceremonies of Zar possession. The result is what one may think of as ethno-aesthetics.
The above quotations in recent scholarship point to the complementarities between the two seemingly different poles of the encounter between Breton, Me traux and Leiris and Vodou. I turn my attention to Alberss work because she considers the theatricality of the crise, or of possession, as a coping mechanism, as both Desmangless and Bretons respective interpretations, cited above, suggest. Given the above considerations, Bretons proposition in the Haitian lectures, while maladroit in rhetorical utterance, in its message is legitimate. As we have already seen, he compares the lived experience of the First World War to that of slavery; and, as mode of relief to the trauma, he describes the bodys total immersion into the unconscious. Yet, even before visiting Haiti, he had already considered the healing aspects of the crise in his novel Nadja, whose narrator describes Nadjas world as one where everything so rapidly assumed the appearance of a rise, a fall (Breton, 1960: 135). Finally, he explains that her eccentricities were due to an unrestricted use of liberty and of human emancipation:
[ . . . ] and this because human emancipationconceived finally in its simplest revolutionary form, which is no less than human emancipation in every respect, by which I mean, according to the means at every mans disposalremains the only cause worth serving. Nadja was born to serve it [ . . . ]. (Breton, 1960: 143)
It is interesting to note that both Leiris and Breton, who collaborated together on the publication Minotaure in the late 1930s (Bernal, 2008: 42), each in his own way, conjugate both ethnographic and literary iterations of the notion of possession. In a sense, just as Rey and Richmans article employs Maurice Merleau-Pontys phenomenology in his grounding of the human experience in the body (Rey and Richman, 2010: 383), it would not be surprising that Leiris and Breton, who were contemporaries of MerleauPonty, would also be informed by an academic discourse that was interested in the body.
Benedicty
293
To push my suggestion of the interpenetration of thought systems further, let us consider Eric Matthewss reading of the relevant intellectual lineage leading to Merleau-Ponty:
The most powerful single influence in introducing Hegels philosophy, and a Hegelianized Marxism, into France was a Russian e migre named Alexandre Koje ` ve, who lectured on Hegels Phenomenology of Spirit at the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes in Paris from 1933 to 1939. These lectures attracted the attention of a number of leading younger intellectuals of the time, including Merleau-Ponty [ . . . ]. (Matthews, 1996: 110111)
As seen in the earlier part of this article, if Buck-Morss argues Hegel and Haiti belong together (2009: 20), and given the intimacy of the Parisian intellectual world to which Merleau-Ponty, Breton and Leiris circulated in the 1930s, it is not surprising that Breton, Me traux, Leiris, and Georges Bataille, whose Les Larmes dEros (1961) showcases Vodou ceremony, pay attention to a phenomonology of spirit that marvels in the body. Moreover, if Hegel was an acute observer of the rupture of social life that we now call modernity (Buck-Morss, 2009: 6), then Bretons focus on the crise/possession as a means for both Europeans and Haitians to deal with the sociopolitical crises is also related to the small, but influential philosophical lineage to which the French scholars belonged. Thus while Conde characterizes the scholarly interest in the relationship between the French and Caribbean intellectuals as one of indifference, a study of the affinities between the Surrealist crise and Vodou possession reveals an entire intellectual discourse that is common to both a Haitian and a French intellectual way of being, one that pre-dates Me traux, Leiris, and Bretons visit to the Caribbean. I would like to return to the idea of theatricality in possession and Alberss suggestion that Leiris conceived of it as a sort of catharsis. Without rejecting Alberss claim, I add to the notion of catharsis the idea that possession is synechdocal: the lwa inhabits the human subject and the human subject partially suspends his or her consciousness so as to allow that of the lwa to cohabit his or her body. Unlike catharsis, the spectator is not separate from the performance; rather, the member of the audience becomes the performer. Colin (Joan) Dayan writes that the possessed gives herself [or himself] up to become an instrument in a social and collective drama (Dayan, 1997: 19). Just as the possessed person contains the spiritual power of the visiting lwa, so does the Vodou objet dart incorporate spiritual power. As Donald Cosentino (1996: 12) explains:
A Vodou clairvoyant is said to have the gift of the eyes, which is the ability to discern spiritual power, pwisans, where others only see matter. [ . . . ] [I]t is the magic within an object which validates its status as sacred art. The magic is often metonymic, residing in some particular aspect of the work. . . .
Spiritual power does not just reveal itself through the material object, whether it be the human being or the materiality of the object of art; rather it becomes a part of the individual. Art in Vodou is not devised as a simile for spirituality, or as a representation of an emotion; instead, it impels the interlocutor to become a part of spirituality. Arts role in Vodou is as much one that reveals intellectual truths, as it is one that bring[s] about healing transformations. Put otherwise by McCarthy Brown (1996: 67), konesans
294
refers to sacred knowledge, the knowledge of how to heal. In Bretons opening essay to Surrealism and Painting, he writes of the varying degrees of sensation which correspond to spiritual realizations (2002: 1). Here, Bretons Surrealism seems to conceive of art as sensation, and the human being who engages in it, seeks it out, might also go so far as to embody it.
Theories of Today: Subjectivities

In this context, possession as seen in Vodou as cultural text or in Bretons novel only reinforces Wisemans notion of ethno-aesthetics (2007: 23) or Dashs articulation o Biehl, Byron Good and of Surrealist ethnographers. Of interest in this regard is Joa Arthur Kleinmans Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations, a compilation of essays on methods for contemporary anthropological observation (Rabinow, 2007: 107). Although Haitian Vodou does not figure as a subject of their volume, I hope to suggest that their theories exemplify the role that the crise of possession may have in enabling a body in crisis to speak for itself. In Return(s) to Subjectivities, in Michael M.J. Fischers epilogue to the collection, we read that our high-technology age and a globalized space that is increasingly nonstate call for a return to subjectivities, in other words a distancing from favouring knowledge systems by which the human state is assumed to be stable, or as Kleinman and Fitz-Henry state:
Scholars have frequently invoked this notion of a unified human nature as the rationale for universals of all kinds, and it continues to be used as a justification for Western ethical discourse, which assumes a static, generalized subject that does not vary with changing historical circumstances, cultural contexts, or sociopolitical institutions. (2007: 52)
In Darren Staloffs Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson: The Politics of Enlightenment and the American Founding (2007), he not only includes a global context for the American Enlightenment, but also provides a thorough history of the important role that Haiti played in differentiating between the politics of the three statesmen, notably Adams and Jefferson. Staloff also vividly summarizes the attitude in which the Enlightenment discourse regarded the supposed supernatural beliefs of pre-Enlightenment Europe. What strikes me in the following passage is that the vocabulary resonates with our above discussions of possession in Haitian Vodou, and Bretons discussions of an aesthetic for the twentieth century:
Historians describe the impact of this worldliness [that of the Enlightenment] as a process of disenchantment. The word has the peculiar virtue of reminding us just how enchanted the worldview of the preceding centuries had been. Comets, earthquakes, volcanoes, and even severe storms were not natural phenomena but portents of divine wrath and judgment. Ghosts walked the earth, and demons possessed the bodies of human victims. Satan was not a symbol of evil but a real, active presenceMartin Luther once reportedly threw an inkwell at him. Miraculous and supernatural cures for a variety of ailments were an accepted part of conventional belief. [ . . . ] The central goal of the Enlightenments metaphysical disenchantment was to subject such time-worn and traditional beliefs to ridicule as childish superstitions. (Staloff, 2007: 14)
Benedicty
295
Fischers epilogue speaks of the necessity in the contemporary age to honour all human expressions, and he emphasizes that the terrains that are considered exotic in European discoursea bit like Staloffs invocation of an almost legendary dystopic time before the Enlightenmentare no longer to be found in communities different from our own. The need to de-marginalize the study of all subjectivitiesthat is, all expressions of the selfwhether seemingly objectively rational or seemingly irrational is quintessential to enabling Eks displace[d] and desubjectifi[ed] bodies (Ek, 2006: 363) to possibly create a (re)constructed platform for individual, social, and civic selves (Fischer, 2007: 425). Building on Eks phrase, I characterize the being which resembles that about which Ek, Fischer or Rabinow speak as a desubjectified subject. If Fischer suggests that the returns to subjectivity might be guarantors of privacy, ethical and social responsibility, and monitoring of integrity (of the body, accountability, civic community), Rabinow is more sceptical in regards to the possibility that such a desubjectified subject might actually be able to act responsibly, at least when the term ethics appears promiscuously in the most surprising couplingsbusiness ethics, baseball ethics, bioethics (Rabinow, 2007: 103):
because we live in a modernity in which the future appears as contingent, the ethical actor cannot know the future chain of consequences of his actions. This situation leads to a dilemma: Either we do not act (but then who takes responsibility for the consequences of inaction?), or we act responsibly, knowing that we cannot know the stochastic results of our actions. Today, we are conscious of accepting risk, and ethics, at least until now, has not been able to provide any criteria for this situation. It has provided only procedures and values. Hence, the cost of a responsibility-based ethics may be its impossibility. (2007: 104)
In other words, how does a desubjectified subject do anything, much less take responsibility? In a sense Rabinows article responds to Stephensons advocacy of a psychoanalysis that looks to the social sciences for amelioration of its own practice. That said, Rabinow rejects the infusion of psychoanalysis into anthropology, for as he points out, it has already been attempted, and it serves to ablate them [anthropologists] from their own cultural prejudices (2007: 99). Instead, he advocates for an immediate history, an anthropology of the actual (2007: 109), by which authors facilitate to the maximum the voices of those along whose side they study: To write immediate history well, authors should not speak for those they aim to present but should seek a mode through which interviewees could speak for themselves (2007: 111). For Rabinow, anthropology thus becomes less about studying culture than about self-formation. The example that Rabinow examines, and offers up as possibly enacting such anthropology of the actual (2007: 109), is that of Thucydides On the Peloponnesian War. Rabinow concludes his article: [ . . . ] we are wise to ponder how a text written twenty-five hundred years ago remains such a keen deictic tool (2007: 117). Rabinows process is one that aims less at achieving a cohesive subject, or subjectivity, but rather strives towards representing the moment. Stephenson provides an etymology of the word possession, relating it to psychology (2009: 117):
296
In English, to possess denotes to hold as property, to own, to occupy; like the der, it derives from the Latin possidere, from potis meaning able and French posse sedere, to sit. The metaphor in the concept of possession is that a being claims space and sits in a position of capability [ . . . ] The goal of psychotherapy is that the patient should become self-possessed.
Thus if the contemporary age, as Fischer puts forward, will not require subjectivity to be located only within the body (Fischer, 2007: 425), Rabinow implies that the anthropological process is less about locating the subject (in a certain identifiable culture), than in describing the singularity of events (2007: 117). For Stephenson, possession is directly related to selfhood sitting in its own seat and of the suffering inherent when selfhood experiences itself as unseated (2009: 3). Like Thucydides, who was no longer an actor in these events; he was in exile but immediately adjacent to things, it seems that what is at stake for Rabinow is less about location or identity than it is about being unquestionably reflective while remaining contemporary to the events themselves (2007: 116). In a sense, then, might possession itself be a means by which an individual speaks and/or embodies its dislocation, while the interpretative aspect that accompanies the process of possession, that offered by those close to the individual possessedwhether mambo, houngan, or anthropologistbe one that enables the community (that of the hounfor, that of the academe) to reflect on the events? In other words, is to be self-possessed less related to subjectivity and identity than to the process of reflection on events that one undergoes? So while the experience of the desubjectified subject may quite possibly be unable to act responsibly faced with a contingent but onrushing future (Rabinow, 2007: 103), and if, as Rabinow suggests, ethics and responsibility are in crisis (2007: 104), if possibility there is, the only way to take inventory of what might be new paradigms that desubjectified subjects might employ to ensure an ethics for the future management of society is quite simply to listen. Rabinow acknowledges that for the anthropologist, as for the historian or the philosopher, finding a form of inquiry [ . . . ] appropriate for studying practices in their immediacy rather than cultures in their atemporality (2007: 111) is challenging in a time in which authority and objectivity are in crisis. As Kleinman and Fitz-Henry point out, such concepts [ . . . ] still largely fail to account for the enormous complexity of human social experiencewar, genocide, structural violence, poverty, and displacementand the highly nuanced subjective states that those experiences engender (Kleinman and Fitz-Henry, 2007: 53). Rabinow thus encourages anthropologists to find conceptually deictic formsforms that would once again make immediate history a tool for bringing particularity and generality into more fruitful, mutually informing relationships, obliging the reader to take up an active and prudential stance toward the issues under deliberation (Rabinow, 2007: 116).8 In writing on Zar possession cults among Ethiopian immigrants in Israel, Eliezer Witztum, Nimrod Grisaru and Danny Budowski identify Zar as a diagnostic category, either as the explanatory model in the Ethiopian community [in Israel] or as a culturebound syndrome in terms of Western diagnostic systems (Witztum et al., 1996: 224). Whether in medicine, literature, or ethnography, the discussion of possession might be a contemporary one, in the sense that Clifford Geertz gives to the term:
Benedicty
297
Contemporaries are persons who share a community of time but not space: they live at (more or less) the same period of history and have, often attenuated, social relationships with one another (Geertz, 1973: 365). In this way, possession, whether in Bretons work or in the text of Haitian Vodou ritual, is a contemporary experience that links Haitians to the French, and even Haitians and the French to Israelis and Ethiopians. Bourguignon (1991: 31) writes:
The argument suggested here is: Possession trance, by offering a decision-making authority in the person of a medium, revealing the presumed will of the spirits, allows persons oppressed by rigid societies some degree of leeway and some elbow room. As such, possession trance may be said to represent a safety valve, of sorts, for societies whose rigid social structures cause certain stresses.
In an increasingly transnational and interconnected space, might it be that societies are no longer as distinct as they used to be? Or rather that contemporary pressures on the individual are such that rigid social structures cause certain stresses in societies that have a long history of naming and/or of being designated as practising possession as such, as well as in societies that have a less comfortable history with assigning possession to characterize a repertoire of behaviours common to the society. In a time that Ek refers to as the return of the camp (2006: 363), dispossession and dislocation are more and more ubiquitous; and we can thus expect that the notion of possession to address problems of dispossession will be more and more important. Thus, within the present discussion of the relevance of global crises to the notion of identity, Haiti and Breton, I argue, are absolutely relevant. What interests me is how the notion of possession as it is conceived of in Haitian Vodou and in Bretons work fits into the above propositions. In the conclusion to their edited volume entitled Haitian Vodou: Spirit, Myth and Reality, Patrick BellegardeSmith and Claudine Michel explain that they have chosen essays that provide an emic perspective, that of the insider (2006: 134):
In this multicultural and multinational worldworlds, to be preciseit is enormously important to allow multitudinous voices to reveal themselves, particularly if they have been violently silenced down through the centuries.
Their propositions reiterate that subjects speak for themselves, and that they speak in the present tense: possession, or crisis, is a privileged moment of such speaking. Desmangles explains, furthermore, that [d]uring the period of possession, the serviteur, `ve `s, the zero-point of contact between the [ . . . ] embodies the cross symbol of the ve sacred and the profane world and his or her body is the vertical line whereby the te (Desmangles, 2006: 48). Thus, revitalizing forces of the universe flow to the socie possession is a mode by which the desubjectified subject may find a means to express itself in the face of an ever-destabilized global reality. In a sense, then, possession is dispossession revitalized. At the very least, it is a lens through which to explore otherness, a sort of displacement within, which represents the displacement of the insular, the displacement that fragments the bodythe human body,
298
the collective body, body as narrative, the body as cultural text. It is a means to explore how the traumatic experiencewhether that of migration, of psychosis, or those of geopolitical and historical impedimentsmight be transcended if only momentarily within Wisemans notion of ethno-aesthet[ic] representation. While it is true, as Albers points out, that both Bretons and Leiriss work reveals exoticist and primitivist representations, she also suggests that studying the modes of Leiriss exoticism is revelatory of ways in which an individual learns to know both his or her own culture as well as that of another (2008: 275276). So while scholars such as Edouard Glissant judge the messages of Surrealism harshly (1997: 742), Dash affirms that writers such as Breton and Leiris also inaugurated a form of writing that Glissant in 1956 calls a welcome combination of literature and ethnography (Dash, 2007: 84). Thus, in the same vein, my intent has been not to judge Bretons work, but rather to listen to Breton in his own words.
Possession, Pwen, and Writing

I now turn to another lens through which we may conceive of possession: possession as a representational form that helps the individual to negotiate displacement and desubjectification (Ek, 2006: 363). If the body in Vodou spirit possession is the place where human and lwa meet and dislodge the human of its corporeal residency, then the body becomes a location that registers that which passes through it. How, if at all, may we compare the experience of possession to that of writing? Toward answering this question, I turn to Glissants considerations of writing as they might relate to his notion of Martinican dispossession (Glissant, 1997: 834). When Glissant writes that Haitian Creole is practically unharmed by the passage. The painted sign is its ancestral residence (1997: 460), he notes a difference between literary production coming out of Haiti and Haitian writers and that of Martinique and Martinican writers. The context of Glissants statement is to expand upon Haitian writers comfort with the written form, noting with dismay that for Martinicans, the passage from the oral to the written form has been more difficult than for the Haitians. In her book entitled African Novels and the Question of Orality, Eileen Julien proposes that scholars of African literature have imposed the false binary of orality/writing. She writes, For many practitioners of African literature and criticism, continuity has meant most often a search for a heritage from oral traditions to the new literatures written in European and African languages, the passage from orality to writing (Julien, 1992: 4). Glissants italicized use of the word passage renders ironic the erroneous notion of the relationship between oral and written communication as evolutionary and civilizing, a derogatory connotation according to which, for the European colonizer, Blacks and other people of color could not write (Gates, 1995: 217) for [ . . . ] writing, according to Hume, was the ultimate sign of difference between animal and human (1995: 218). Glissants use of the word passage in association with writing also invokes the tragedy of The Middle Passage or la Traverse e. To better understand how writing, passage and possession are related, let us now look more closely at the modalities of possession as articulated in Vodou. Re ginald O. Crosley (2006: 7) writes:
Benedicty
299
` kadav, gro [gwo] bon anj, and ti bon anj, In Haiti, the components of man are known as ko which correspond to the body, the semedo, and the selido of the Dahomeans and the body, the moyo, and the mfumu-kutu of the Bantu or Bakongo. In Dagaraland, Burkina Faso, we have , and a third component which is a spirit or a God. the body, a soul or body double called sie
For a Vodouisant, both the gwo-bon-anj and the ti-bon-anj are manifestations of a persons soul; however, the gwo-bon-anj corresponds more closely to a Christian concept of soul and the Freudian concept of psyche, and the ti-bon-anj to personality. Since in Vodou the energy of matter is common to all living matter, then, we may think of the gwo-bon-anj and the ti-bon-anj as parts of a totality (Deren, 1970: 25). The gwo-bon-anj is an element of the universal life force, or the supreme God of Vodou, Bondye. Desmangles (1992: 66) describes the gwo-bon-anj as follows:
The first compartment [ . . . ] is the immortal, cosmic spirit of Bondye, which is manifested in the body [ . . . ]. It is a life-force, an internal dynamism planted within the body that serves as its shell. It derives its subsistence from, and is an offshoot particle of Bondye; it is sustained and molded by the same stuff from which creation flows.
In contrast, the ti-bon-anj is personality, conscience, the moral side of ones character [ . . . ] it is that element in a person which is the physical manifestation of his or her gwobon-anj (Desmangles, 1992: 67). Both Desmangles and Deren explain that one can imagine them as twins in which the gwo-bon-anj is the metaphysical double of the physical being [or ti-bon-anj] (Deren, 1970: 26). The ti-bon-anj as physical being is the individual personality that performs actions in society. The above description of the tri-partite conception of the human in Vodou cosmology not only emphasizes the non-material components of the personthat is, his or her two souls (Crosley, 2006: 7), but also draws attention to the cohabitation of various modes of consciousness. To the two souls that reside within the human body, during the moment of possession, a third resident manifests itself, the lwa, which traverses the human body displacing either the gwo-bon-anj or ti-bon-anj that resides within the car` kadav. nal body, the ko ` kadav becomes a proscenium, a canvas, across which varied In a sense, the ko voicesti-bon-anj, gwo-bon-anj, lwaleave their imprint. Regardless of whether one is a Vodouist or notwhether one believes or not in the spiritual power of the three phenomenathe three manifest themselves as distinct narrative voices that play themselves out on the stage that is the human body. If for Leiris and Brown there is a theatrical aspect to possession in which the body performs for observers, I would also propose that this body is itself a stage on which various phenomenological entities perform. By phenomenological actor, I mean an entityin this context the ti-bon-anj, gwo-bon-anj, or lwathat speaks in its own right, that represents its own individual subjectivity. In this ` kadav becomes a place: a place that is traversed, a place occupied by various way, the ko entities, some denizens that are displaced (gwo-bon-anj and ti-bon-anj) and those that invade and dislodge (the lwa). ` kadav becomes a place, we may relate possession to Glissants poeIn so far as the ko tic endeavour. Although Carine Mardorossians article has nothing to do with Vodou, the
300
discourse she invokes when tracing a genealogy between Frantz Fanon and Glissant complements our present discussion of Vodou possession. Mardorossian invokes Michelle Praegers description of Glissants creolized aesthetic as a poetics of location in which one finds in Glissants work a discourse of geographical continuity meant to compensate for the nonhistory of the Caribbean (Mardorossian, 2009: 23). Further on, Mardorossian writes:
One would think that a cultural model that embraces mutability and the coming together of cultures may necessarily be more lukewarm in its critique of the effects of colonialism. Yet, as Fanons and Glissants interventions both illustrate, insight into cultural heritage as a site of interaction need not compromise on ones condemnation of the de possession resulting from colonial and neocolonial relations. (2009: 23)
Mardorossians text directly relates a poetics of location to Glissants notion of dispossession; in a sense, they act as a call and response to one another, where colonial and tique de la postcolonial dispossession call upon the poet to create the Glissantian poe relation, which for Praeger applies to locations, symbolic sites through which the relationality of the modern world is discussed and embodied (Mardorossian, 2009: 23). If the phenomenological actors in the poetics of possession are the ti-bon-anj, the gwobon-anj, and the hundreds of lwa privy to descending upon the human body, then they act in much the same way as do the figures of speech that the poet uses to give life to ` kadav, like the morpheme or the phoneme, is nothing more words. In a sense, the ko than a signifier waiting to receive its meaning from a relational experience that depends on location. ` kadav as location may initially seem contrary The emphasis that I have put on the ko to the notion that the corporeal body in Vodou is like a horse which the lwa mountsthe often erratic mobility with which a horse is associated contradicts the notion of body as domicile, and yet, it is precisely that: the body in Haitian Vodou is a domicile in continual displacement whose denizens are also continually displaced to make way for the spirits. In a sense, it is Derridas flying signifier, constantly on the move, continually the vehicle of meanings that are both complementary and contradictory, a medium for the mutability and coming together of cultures (Mardorossian, 2009: 23). In his recent Cannibal Modernities, Lu s Madureira (2005: 6) advocates the reading of texts that reveal a latticework of uneven and subtle continuities, which in turn enable readings of nonwestern modernisms to be submitted to a thoroughgoing re-evaluation (2005: 2). Breton is from the West, but as Dash points out, the Caribbean is not necessarily non-western. Dash refers to Geertz, who speaks to Le vi-Strausss dismissal of the Caribbean as a space not pure enough in its exotic distance from European culture, whereas Leiriss interest is to explore Haiti and Martinique as mirrors in which the everyday provides zones of interaction, a the a tre ve cu, involving self and other (Dash, 2007: 91):
It is precisely because it was such a complex mirror of real and unreal, of unpredictable images and displaced originals, that Leiris could sense in this act of self-exploration the
Benedicty
301
interactions of global modernity. The destabilizing and creolizing Caribbean, with its desubjectifying possibilities, becomes an ideal site for Leiriss self-ethnography.
Dashs desubjectifying possibilities recast Eks and Rabinows notions of the desubjectified subject in a more hopeful light. In her recent work, Kaiama L. Glover speaks of identifying new centres in considerations of Caribbean discourses. She writes of the role her book Haiti Unbound: A Spiralist Challenge to the Postcolonial Canon plays in literary theory on Haiti:
Haiti Unbound fills, then, a rather astonishingly empty place in the assessment of postcolonial Caribbean aesthetics. Affirming the presence of a spiral-based aesthetic in major prose and fiction works [ . . . ], I frame my analyses here in an interrogation of the criteria for inclusion in New World traditions, considering the manner in which new centers and margins have been created in the already peripheralized space(s) of the Americas. (Glover, 2010: xi)
Similarly, this article hopes to have offered yet another way of centring (or decentring) discourses on the physical and intellectual encounters between Breton, Haiti, Haitian Vodou, and theories of subjectivities as related specifically to possession. By using possession in Haitian Vodou as a theoretical counterpoint for a textual analysis of Bretons first Haitian conference and the novel Nadja, I hope to have shed light on a short-lived, yet important piece of the architecture that constitutes the eventful encounter of Breton with Haiti. In Laperto: Luomo e lanimale, Agamben asks: What does mastery of the relation between nature and humanity mean? That neither must man master nature nor nature man (Agamben, 2004: 83); and later on in his article on Agamben, Ek explains that the state of emergency in society [ . . . ] requires the suspension of the normal order to resolve (Ek, 2006: 365). I have hoped to suggest that in its own way possession is a highly deictic form that brings immedia[cy] to a subjects narration of himself, herself, or itself (Rabinow, 2007: 116), and, more importantly, might be a conceptual space that is far more contemporary than it might on first glance seem. Notes
1. I am indebted to J. Ryan Poynter for making me aware of Bretons Haitian Conferences and for encouraging me to relate them to my work on contemporary Haitian literature. Id also like to thank Terry Rey, Christian Flaugh and David Laserre for editing my work. 2. For more on the literary and philosophical genealogies between Andre Breton, Aime Ce saire, Rene Depestre, Michel Leiris, and Pierre Mabille, please see J. Michael Dash, Jean-Claude Michel, Nick Nesbitt, Timothy J. Reiss, Aliko Songolo, and Gary Wilders work. 3. Besides Andre Bretons Nadja, for which I use Richard Howards 1960 translation, and Giorgio Agambens The Open: Man and Animal, for which I use Kevin Attells 2004 translation, all translations are mine. 4. Agambens work looks most prominently at the camp of the Holocaust in Europe; however, given his discussion of the challenges of humanitarianism, for example in Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (1998 [1995]: 133), it is plausible to understand Eks reference to
302
5.
6. 7.
8. 9.
10. 11.
the camp as both a metaphor and a contemporary reality. Agamben has been criticized for an aestheticization of politics in his writing (De la Durantaye, 2009: 12). Erica Bourguignon acknowledges symptoms similar to possession, but characterizes as possession only those groups of people that self-identify with the word: Nevertheless, if we speak in very general terms about dissociation, fugue states, multiple personalities, fainting, functional epileptic seizures and other behavior of an apparently hysterical type, then the behavior is probably universal and occurs in all societies; however, it should not properly be referred to as possession states (10). For his part, Gilbert Rougets comparative analysis of ethnographic work on phenomena similar to possession throughout the world, includes terminology such as crisis (67, 38), ecstasy (4), and trance (38). It may also be that Bretons elation in his conference is due to the fact that he is speaking in December 1945, after the surrender of Nazi Germany to the Allied powers, May 1945. Gilbert Rouget explains the usage of the word crise in the French context: Three words constantly recur in texts describing possession cults: possession (of course), trance, and crisis (crise). But all authors do not use the last two terms in the same way. Some talk mainly of crisis: Michel Leiris (1958) and Andras Zemple ni (1966) in particular, in their descriptions of possession in Ethiopia and Senegal respectively. [ . . . ] The word crise is used to denote sometimes a convulsive form of trance, sometimes the paroxysmic aspect of trance when it displays periods of variable intensity, sometimes the onset of trance if it is characterized by a moment of more or less distressing agitation, and finally sometimesand this last is a very different usageto refer to the troubled period a given individual may undergo, and which will lead him to seek an outlet in possession (38). Given the initial collaborations between Breton and Leiris, it would make sense that Breton would use the word crise; that said, Alfred Me traux uses the word possession and Bretons work pre-dates either of Rougets references. As discussed above, it seems that Breton might intentionally be using the word crise to designate the secular act in which he is engaged, and possession to denote a more religious aspect of Vodou. Breton uses and italicizes the word sertie, which refers to the setting of a stone or of a jewel. Breton proposes that the concept of the somatic crisis has been newly re-discovered in Europe by the Surrealists: he explains that the Jesuits and Jansenists had already experimented with alternative somatic states (Breton, 1999b: 160). Id like to keep the idea of incantation, which emphasizes the element of body and song, somewhat lost in the translation. Here, having never engaged in the ethnographic process myself, my interest resides in the discourses that anthropologists, historians, literary scholars, psychologists, religious studies scholars, and writers employ to study culture, identity, possession, subjectivity, and self-possession.
References
Agamben G (1998 [1995]) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel HellerRoazen. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Agamben G (2004) The Open: Man and Animal. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Albers I (2008) Mimesis and alterity: Michel Leiriss ethnography and poetics of spirit possession. French Studies: A Quarterly Review 62(3): 271289.
Benedicty
303
Beauvoir MG (2006) Herbs and energy: The holistic medical system of the Haitian people. In: Bellegarde-Smith P, Michel C (eds) Haitian Vodou: Spirit, Myth and Reality. Bloomington/ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 112133. Be lance R (1999) Interview de Rene Be lance, Interview de Jean Duche , which took place December 1213, 1945 in Port-au-Prince and was published in Hati-Journal and published raire. In: Bonnet M (ed.) Andre Breton: Oeuvres comple `tes, 4 vols. Paris: Editions in Le Litte Gallimard, vol. III, 584587. Bellegarde-Smith P and Michel C (eds) (2006) Haitian Vodou: Spirit, Myth and Reality. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. os de paisajes lejanos. Revista de Estudios Bernal MC (2008) El encantador de serpientes: Suen Sociales 30 (August): 3845. Biehl J, Good B and Kleinman A (2007) Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations. Durham, NC: University of California Press. Breton: Oeuvres comple `tes, 4 vols. Paris: Editions Gallimard, Bonnet M (ed.) (1999) Andre 1999. Bourguignon E (1991 [1976]) Possession. Prospect Heights, NY: Waveland Press. Breton A (1960) Nadja. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Grove Press. Breton A (1964) Nadja. Paris: Editions Gallimard. Breton A (1999a) Discours au club Savoy de Port-au-Prince, prononce le 7 de cembre. In: Breton: Oeuvres comple `tes, 4 vols. Paris: Editions Gallimard, vol. III, Bonnet M (ed.) Andre 146149. Breton A (1999b) Le Surre alisme: Confe rence inaugurale de confe rences sur la litte rature, pronon Breton: ce e au the a tre Rex a ` Port-au-Prince le 20 de cembre 1945. In: Bonnet M (ed.), Andre `tes, 4 vols. Paris: Editions Gallimard, vol. III, 150167. Oeuvres comple Breton A (2002) Surrealism and Painting. New York: MFA Publications. Buck-Morss S (2009) Hegel, Haiti and Universal History. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Coates CF (2006) Vodou in Haitian Literature. In: Bellegarde-Smith P, Michel C (eds) Invisible Powers: Vodou in Haitian Life and Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 181198. Conde M (2001) Fous ten Depestre; Laisse dire Aragon. The Romantic Review 92(12) (Jan.March): 177184. Corin E (2007) The Other of culture in psychosis: The ex-centricity of the subject. In: Biehl J, Good B, Kleinman A (eds) Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 273314. Cosentino DJ (1996) Doing Vodou. African Arts 29(2): 114. Crosley RO (2006) Shadow-matter universes in Haitian and Dagara ontologies: A comparative study. In: Bellegrade-Smith P, Michel C (eds) Haitian Vodou: Spirit, Myth and Reality. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 718. Dash JM (1998) The Other America: Caribbean Literature in a New World Context. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia. Dash JM (2007) Le Je de lautre: Surrealist ethnographers and the Francophone Caribbean. ateur 47(1): 8495. LEsprit Cre Dayan J (1997) Vodou, or the voice of the gods. In: Olmos MF, Paravisini-Gebert L (eds) Sacred Possessions: Vodou, Santera, Obeah, and the Caribbean. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1336.
304
De la Durantaye L (2009) Giorgio Agamben: A Critical Introduction. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. tier a ` me tisser. Paris: Editions Stock. Depestre R (1998) Le me Deren M (1970) Divine Horsemen: The Living Gods of Haiti. New Paltz and New York: McPherson. Desmangles LG (1992) The Faces of the Gods: Vodou and Roman Catholicism in Haiti. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Desmangles LG (2006)African interpretations of the Christian Cross in Vodou. In: Bellegarde-Smith P, Michel C (eds) Invisible Powers: Vodou in Haitian Life and Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 3950. Duche J (1946) Interview de Jean Duche , which took place on October 5, 1946 in Paris and was raire. In: Bonnet M (ed.), Andre Breton: Oeuvres comple `tes, 4 vols. Paris: published in Le Litte Editions Gallimard, 1946, vol. III, 588599. Ek G (2006) Giorgio Agamben and the spatialities of the camp: An introduction. Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography: Geogr. Ann. 88B(4): 363386. Fischer S (2004) Modernity Disavowed: Haiti and the Cultures of Slavery in the Age of Revolution. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press. Fischer MMJ (2007) Epilogue. To live with what would otherwise be unendurable: Return(s) to subjectivities. In: JBiehl J, Good B, Kleinman A (eds) Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 273314. Gates HL (1995) Writing race. In: Ashcroft B, Griffiths G, Tiffin H (eds) The Post-Colonial Studies Reader, 2nd edition. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge, 216218. Geertz C (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. ditions Gallimard. Glissant E (1997) Le discours antillais. Paris: E Glover KL (2010) Haiti Unbound: A Spiralist Challenge to the Postcolonial Canon. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Julien E (1992) African Novels and the Question of Orality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Jung C (2007) The personal and the collective unconscious. In: Clark M (ed.) Juxtapositions: Ideas for College Writers. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing, 4860. Kaussen V (2008) Migrant Revolutions: Haitian Literature, Globalization, and U.S. Imperialism. Lanham, MD and New York: Lexington Books. Kleinman A and Fritz-Henry E (2007) The experiential basis of subjectivity: How individuals change in the context of social transformation In: Biehl J, Good B, Kleinman A (eds) Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 5165. Madureira L (2005) Cannibal Modernities: Postcoloniality and the Avant-Garde in Caribbean and Brazilian Literature. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2005. Mardorossian C (2009) From Fanon to Glissant: A Martinican genealogy. Small Axe 13(3): 1224. Matthews E (1996) Twentieth-Century French Philosophy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. McCarthy Brown K (2006) Afro-Caribbean spirituality: A Haitian case study. In: Bellegarde-Smith P, Michel C (eds) Vodou in Haitian Life and Culture: Invisible Powers. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 126. McCarthy Brown K (1996) Altars happen. African Arts 29(2): 67.
Benedicty
305
Michel JC (2000) The Black Surrealists. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. Michel C and Bellegrade-Smith P (eds) (2006) Invisible Powers: Vodou in Haitian Life and Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Nesbitt N (2003) Voicing Memory: History and Subjectivity in French Caribbean Literature. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia. Nesbitt N (2008) Universal Emancipation: The Haitian Revolution and the Radical Enlightenment. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia. Rabinow P (2007) Anthropological observation and self-formation. In: Biehl J, Good B, Kleinman A (eds) Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 98118. Reiss TJ (2004) Music, Writing, and Cultural Unity in the Caribbean. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press. Rey T and Richman K (2010) The somatics of syncretism: Tying body and soul in Haitian religion. Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 39(3): 379403. Rouget G (1985 [1980]) Music and Trance: A Theory of the Relations between Music and Possession. Trans. Brunhilde Biebuyck. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. Scott D (2004) Conscripts of Modernity: The Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment. Durham and London: Duke University Press. ` ditions Songolo A (1985) Music, Writing, and Cultural Unity in the Caribbean. Paris: E LHarmattan. Staloff D (2007) Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson: The Politics of Enlightenment and the American Founding. New York: Hill and Wang. Stephenson CE (2009) Possession: Jungs Comparative Anatomy of the Psyche. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge. Wilder G (2005) The French Imperial Nation-State: Negritude and Colonial Humanism between the Two World Wars. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. vi-Strauss, Anthropology and Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Wiseman B (2007) Le Press. Witztum E, Grisaru N and Budowski D (1996) The Zar possession syndrome among Ethiopian immigrants to Israel: Cultural and clinical aspects. British Journal of Medical Psychology 69: 207225.

BenedictyTowards An Intellectual History of Possession Reading La Crise As A Textual Space in Vodou and Andre Breton's Haitian Lectures and Nadja

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

BenedictyTowards An Intellectual History of Possession Reading La Crise As A Textual Space in Vodou and Andre Breton's Haitian Lectures and Nadja

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses

The Canadian Corporation for Studies in Religion

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)

A Historical Context: Rapture and Revolution in Bretons Haitian Lectures

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)

Surrealisms Unresolved Challenge

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)

Surrealist Crisis4 and Vodou Possession

Breton is intent on distinguishing his Surrealist experimentation from possession in Vodou:

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)

Theories of Today: Subjectivities

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)

Possession, Pwen, and Writing

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 41(2)

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Downloaded from sir.sagepub.com at DUKE UNIV on September 5, 2012

Вам также может понравиться