0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
441 просмотров2 страницы
The COMELEC did not err in declaring a failure of elections in Remedios T. Romualdez, Agusan del Norte. Private respondents filed a petition alleging massive fraud during the elections including ballot switching and stuffing. COMELEC granted the petition, nullified the election results, and called for a special election. The Supreme Court upheld COMELEC's decision, finding substantial evidence that counting was transferred without authority and done without watchers, violating election procedures and failing to safeguard the people's will.
The COMELEC did not err in declaring a failure of elections in Remedios T. Romualdez, Agusan del Norte. Private respondents filed a petition alleging massive fraud during the elections including ballot switching and stuffing. COMELEC granted the petition, nullified the election results, and called for a special election. The Supreme Court upheld COMELEC's decision, finding substantial evidence that counting was transferred without authority and done without watchers, violating election procedures and failing to safeguard the people's will.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
The COMELEC did not err in declaring a failure of elections in Remedios T. Romualdez, Agusan del Norte. Private respondents filed a petition alleging massive fraud during the elections including ballot switching and stuffing. COMELEC granted the petition, nullified the election results, and called for a special election. The Supreme Court upheld COMELEC's decision, finding substantial evidence that counting was transferred without authority and done without watchers, violating election procedures and failing to safeguard the people's will.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Facts: Petitioners and private respondents vied for local posts in Remedios T. Romualdez (RTR), Agusan del Norte during the 1998 elections. Petitioners belonged to LakasNUCD party, while private respondents ran under the Laban ng Makabayan Masang Pilipino (LAMMP) banner. After election day, all the LAKAS candidates were proclaimed as winning candidates. Six days after that, p.respondent Bacquial filed a petitions to declare a failure of elections due to massive fraud, terrorism, ballot switching, stuffing of ballot boxes, delivery of ballot boxes by petitioner Soliva, his wife and men from several precincts to the supposed canvassing area, failure of the counting of votes in the precincts or polling places, and other anomalies or irregularities. Baludio, one of Solivas men, allegedly attempted to assassinate Bacquial when he was about to case his vote. This petition was amended to include the other candidates under LAMMP. COMELEC granted the petition and declared a failure of elections in RTR. COMELEC likewise declared the proclamation of winners to be null and void. COMELEC called for a special election. Petitioners filed this present petition for certiorari and prohibition attributing grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of, or in excess of, jurisdiction to COMELEC, when, without any formal proceedings and absent any formal presentation of evidence and witnesses, it declared a failure of elections. SolGen maintains that the declaration is proper because of the grounds stated by private respondents. Issue: Whether COMELEC erred in declaring a failure of election in the entire municipality of RTR Held: The COMELEC did not err, did not commit grave abuse of discretion; the petition was dismissed. The 1987 Constitution vested upon the COMELEC the broad power to enforce all the laws and regulations of the conduct of elections as well as the plenary authority to decide all questions affecting elections, except the question as to the right to vote. (plenary full, entire, complete) Section 4 of RA 7166 provide that the postponement, declaration of failure of elections and the calling of special elections shall be decided by COMELEC sitting en banc by a majority vote. Section 6 of the Omnibus Election Code contemplates 3 instances when the COMELEC may declare a failure of election and call for the holding of a special election: o when the election in any polling place has not been held on the date fixed due to force majeure, violence, terrorism, fraud or other analogous cases o when the election in any polling place had been suspended before the hour fixed by law for the closing of voting o when after the voting and during the preparation and the transmission of the election returns or in the custody or canvass thereof, such election results in a failure to elect The SC agrees with the findings of COMELEC that there was a failure of election. The counting of the votes and the canvassing of election returns were clearly attended by
fraud, intimidation, terrorism and harassment. Findings of fact of administrative bodies
charged with a specific field of expertise are afforded great weight and respect by the courts. Petitioners did not assail the claim that the counting of votes was transferred from the polling place to the multi-purpose gymnasium without the knowledge of private respondents. They were done without the accredited watchers or duly authorized representatives of private respondents. They likewise did not deny that the transfer of the counting was without the authority of COMELEC as required by law. The provisions in COMELEC resolution no. 2971 state that the counting of votes should be in the polling place and conducting without interruption, and that if the counting of votes were to be transferred to a safer place, it should be effected through an unanimous approval of the Board of Election Inspectors (BEI) and concurred by the majority of watchers present. These sections were violated. These provisions emphasize the need to safeguard the popular will. Petitioners did not submit any counter affidavits to rebut the sworn statements submitted by the witnesses for the private respondents. The elections cannot be accorded regularity and validity. The circumstances constitute a failure of election, and thus, COMELEC is empowered to annul the election and call for a special election.