Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Lecturer:
OUTLINE
I. Recap II. History of ethnographic research III. thnographic research !etho"s I. II. Participant-o#servation $ey infor!ant intervie%ing Use of genealogical !etho" &athering of cases 'life-histories( conflict cases)* +ther e!ergent !etho"s,strategies in co!!unity stu"ies
I.
RECAP
Quantitative vs Qualitative Approaches 2 Quantitative research is use" to ans%er 3uestions a#out relationships a!ong !easure" varia#les %ith the purpose of e4plaining( pre"icting( an" controlling pheno!enon. 2 5ualitative research ans%ers 3uestions a#out the co!ple4 nature of pheno!ena( %ith the purpose of "escri#ing an" un"erstan"ing the pheno!ena fro! the participants6 point of vie% 'emic)7also referre" to as the interpretive( constructivist( or post-positivist approach. Purpose: 2 Quantitative research see0s explanations an" predictions for purposes of generalization to other persons or places. 2 Qualitative research see0s a #etter un"erstan"ing of co!ple4 situations( often e4ploratory in nature( an" !ay use their o#servations to #uil" fro! the groun" up.
1. Your audience is: .. Your research /uestion is: *. The availa%le literature is: (. Your research focus: $. Your a%ility and desire to work with !eo!le is: . Your desire for structure is: 8. You have skills in areas of: 9. Your writing skills are strong in the area of:
Reference: Paul -. Le""y an" Jenne llis +r!on". 899:. Linking Data and Research Methodology ( in Practical Research Plannin an! Desi n.
TECHNIQUES AN
Co!!on types of 3ualitative research !etho"s,approaches :. thnographic research 'Case stu"y)* 8. Historical stu"y ;. Content analysis <. !ergent strategies,approaches: RR.( PR.( =&-( =ar!ing Syste!s( -iscourse analysis( a!ong others. In these e4a!ples the research !etho"s( techni3ues an" tools usually e!ploye" are: 2 Intervie%ing 'se!i-structure" an" 0ey infor!ant)* 2 +#servational techni3ue( inclu"ing participant o#servation 2 Case stu"y 2 Participatory .ction an" Learning techni3ue 2 &roup process !etho"s
I.
Ethnography "eals %ith the stu"y of the "iversity of hu!an cultures in their particular cultural settings. >his !etho" has "evelope" in early anthropological fiel" research carrie" out in non-%estern cultures.
O"#ectives: >o e4pose the stu"ent,researcher to the ethnographic research !etho" that has a long history in the stu"y of non-%estern societies in their o%n cultural conte4ts. 2 >o intro"uce the "ifferent ethnographic research !etho"s,approaches 2 >o allo% the researcher to appreciate the "ifferent ethnographic !etho"s,approaches use" in un"erstan"ing "iverse cultures( their #eliefs an" practices as their co!!unities respon" to a transfor!ing %orl" in the conte4t of "evelop!ent.
19th century context of the Social Sciences (Economics, Political Science, Psychology, Sociology) Eurocentric development of concepts, theories and methods Age of exploration and discovery !ravelers, "issionaries, Explorers, Ship #aptains $iscovery of exotic people, %savages&, %primitives&, %heathens&, %uncivili'ed& (acial and cultural diversity explanations and theories Unilineal evolutionary theory (Savagery, )ar*arism, #ivili'ation) +rom armchair to field,or- (Anthropologists traveled to study non ,estern cultures) "alino,s-i. +ield,or- in the !ro*riand /slands and the formali'ation of ethnographic field research methods. extended residence in the village, learning the native language, participant o*servation, genealogical mapping, Anthropology as a discipline studies cultural *ehavior *y using the holistic, historical and comparative methods0
I.
POINTS TO RE%E%&ER IN OIN$ QUALITATI!E RESEARCH The researcher an! the researche! as &eanin ' ivin su"#ects
2 >hey are conscious beings 2 People give !eaning to things an" act as such to %hat he,she sees or hears( an" cannot #e free" fro! i!purities an" "efects in the sa!e %ay a physical instru!ent of research can #e sterili?e" or perfecte".
The %iel!(or)er as a hu&an "ein
2 >he social scientist is her,his o%n chie research instrument. 2 >his research instru!ent is "efective 7it can #e perfecte" #ut can never #e perfect. 2 /e "o not go to the fiel" as a tabula rasa( the "efectiveness or conta!ination %e #ring to the fiel" ste!s fro! !ainly three sources:
!he degree o our natural endo"ments to o#serve an" recor" #ur theoretical bias: color our perceptions #ur meta-theoretical biases: these are the unrecogni?e" an" une4a!ine" assu!ptions
I.
2 People "o not al%ays !ean %hat they say( or say %hat they !ean( or even 0no% %hat they are tal0ing a#out 're!e!#er( people are !eaning-giving su#@ects) 2 .si"e fro! outright "eception( co!!on are !e!ory an" revie%( co!poun"e" %hen %e "eal %ith oral tra"itionsA %hat is trans!itte" fro! generation to generation ten"s to #e affecte" #y loss of "etail.
I.
Wha' is (ield)or*?
thnographic fiel"%or0 entails the e4ten"e" resi"ence of the researcher in a fiel" setting 'e.g.( co!!unity( village( institution)( participating an" o#serving the "aily activities an" #ehavior of the people %here research is carrie" out.
I.
Participant'O"server Roles :. 8. ;. <. Co!plete o#server 'overt( covert)* Participant as o#server '!ore as an o#server than a participant)* +#server-as-participant '!ore as a participant than o#server)* Co!plete participant
Han"-out
O"servation
:. Scientific in3uiry using o#servational !etho"s re3uires "iscipline" training an" rigorous preparation 8. People "on6t Bnaturally6 0no% ho% to "o syste!atic research o#servations ;. +#servation entails the syste!atic noting an" recor"ing of events( #ehaviors( an" artifacts 'o#@ects) in the chosen setting
I.
Recor!in O"servations :. 8. ;. <. D. F. $eep fiel" note#oo0 >a0e notes on your o#servations as you o#serve /rite "o%n notes as soon as possi#le Cotes shoul" inclu"e e!pirical o#servations an" interpretations Cross files Efill in "ates an" ti!es you !a"e o#servations. .naly?e an" interpret your o#servations( "iscerning patterns of #ehavior( fin"ing the un"erlying !eanings in the thing you o#serve"
In'Depth Intervie(in :. Learn to listen( thin0 an" tal0 al!ost at the sa!e ti!e. 8. Pro#e Eho% is thatG In %hat %ayG Ho% "o you !eanG /hat %oul" #e an e4a!ple of thatG ;. Revie% notes every night Eo#serve activities,#ehavior HgapsI that !ust #e further o#serve". <. Co!#ine" %ith o#servation( intervie%s allo% the researcher to un"erstan" the !eanings people hol" for their every"ay activities.
I.
* General Cate ories o% Intervie(s :. Infor!al conversational intervie% E3ualitative in-"epth intervie% are !ore li0e the conversations than for!al events %ith pre"eter!ine" response categories. 8. >he general intervie% gui"e approach an" the ;. Stan"ar" open-en"e" intervie% +iel! Notes 2 Cote#oo0: "o not rely on !e!ory 2 Cotes shoul" #e "ocu!ente" right a%ay 2 $eep a research "iary to "ocu!ent ho% %or0 is procee"ing( an" the ti!e spent
I.
2
T$pes,Sta es o% +iel! Notes $ubstantive fiel" notes focus on the !ain o#servations( conversations( e4periences an" intervie%s Methodological infor!ation "ocu!ents the su#@ective i!pressions of the researcher o#serve" in the "ata-gathering conte4t. %nalytic ield notes contain preli!inary stages of analysis. Here "ata are sorte"( co"e"( an" analy?e" for the first ti!e E gaps can #e a""resse" an" 3uestions can #e follo%e"-up. -ata sheet shoul" inclu"e "ate( place( an" source of infor!ation
I.
I.
I.
Caution
2 A-oid 'he i/posi'io+ o( /oder+ 'hou2h' pa''er+s i+ a+ earlier era 2 Se+si'i-i'y should ,e 2i-e+ 'o 'he i+'erpre'a'io+ o( 'he s'a'e/e+' o( o'hers3 2 His'orical a+alysis ca++o' use a direc' o,ser-a'io+ approach a+d 'here is +o )ay 'o 'es' a his'orical hypo'hesis. 2 There are )ea*+esses i+ 'he classi(ica'io+ o( his'orical da'a4
%ay ,e su,5ec' 'o i+correc' i+'erpre'a'io+s o+ 'he par' o( 'he recorder. Words a+d phrases used i+ old records /ay +o) ha-e di((ere+' /ea+i+2s ocu/e+'s /ay ,e (alsi(ied deli,era'ely The /ea+i+2 o( relics are percei-ed a+d i+'erpre'ed ,y 'he i+-es'i2a'or. Errors i+ recordi+2 as )ell as (rauds6 hoa7es6 a+d (or2eries pose pro,le/s i+ deali+2 )i'h 'he pas'
I.
I.
I.
I.
.INESICS
I.
/i&itations
2 Bo"y language is not universal. So!e gestures signal "ifferent !eanings in "ifferent cultures: e4a!ple: the up an" "o%n hea" no" signifies HnoI an" the Hsi"e-to-si"eI !ove!ents of the hea" !eans HyesI. 2 Bo"y !ove!ents !ust #e interprete" in conte4t
I.
I.
PRO8E%ICS
I.
I.
I.
Anal$tic Proce!ures
:. +rgani?ing the "ata. 8. &enerating categories( the!es( an" patterns. ;. >esting the e!ergent hypothesis against the "ata. <. Searching for alternative e4planations of the "ata. D. /riting the report.
Or ani1ation o% Data
:. Rea"ing E an" rea"ing once !ore through the "ata forces the researcher to #eco!e fa!iliar %ith those "ata in inti!ate %ays 8. Co"ing of "ata E list on note car"s,in"e4 car"s the "ata availa#le 'color an" nu!#er co"ing)* ;. Perfor! the !inor e"iting necessary to !a0e fiel" notes retrieva#le( an" generally Hclean-upI %hat see!s over%hel!ing an" un!anagea#le. <. +rgani?e co"es into !ore inclusive an" a#stract "o!ains such as !etho"ological notes( analytic !e!os( theoretical notes( case su!!aries( "iagra!s( charts( an" "u!!y ta#les. D. nter the "ata into one of the several soft%are progra!s for the !anage!ent an",or analysis of 3ualitative "ata.
I.
Ra( !ata have no inherent !eaningA the interpretive act #rings !eaning
to those "ata an" "isplays that !eaning to the rea"er through the %ritten report.
Me&os an! Dia ra&s are %ritten recor"s of analysis that !ay vary in
type an" for!.
Co!e notes are !e!os containing the actual pro"ucts of the three types
of co"ing. 2 2 2 !heoretical notes: sensiti?ing an" su!!ari?ing !e!os that contain an analyst6s thoughts an" i"eas a#out theoretical sa!pling an" other issues. #perational notes: !e!os containing proce"ural "irections an" re!in"ers( Diagrams( visual devices that "epict the relationship a!ong concepts.
I.
:. 1e!os an" "iagra!s shoul" contain hea"ings "enoting the concepts or categories to %hich they pertain.
2 1e!os an" "iagra!s that relate t%o or !ore categories to each other or to su#categories shoul" cross-reference the concepts in the hea"ings.
:. >he title or hea"ing shoul" "escri#e the type of !e!o #eing %ritten. 8. >he analyst coul" !o"ify the content !e!o an" "iagra!s as ne% "ata lea" to increase" insights. 2 >he analyst shoul" #e conceptual rather than "escriptive %hen %riting !e!os. 1e!os are not a#out people or even a#out events or inci"ents as such. Rather( they are a#out the conceptual i"eas "erive" fro! these.
I.
Conceptual Or!erin
General cate ories0 the&es an! patterns 2 >his phase is the !ost "ifficult( co!ple4( a!#iguous( creative( an" fun. I"entifying salient the!es( recurring i"eas or language an" patterns of #elief that lin0 people an" settings together is the !ost intellectually challenging phase of "ata analysis an" one that can integrate the entire en"eavor. >he process of category generation involves noting regularities in the setting of people chosen for stu"y. .s categories of !eaning e!erge( the researcher searches for those that have internal convergence an" e4ternal "ivergence Ethe categories shoul" #e internally consistent #ut "istinct fro! one another.
2 2
I.
Conceptual Or!erin
E'ic6 E/ic a'a A+alysis
>he researcher !ay use in"igenous typologies 'e!ic) or Hanalyst-constructe" typologiesI 'etic) to reflect a classification sche!e use" #y the people in the setting un"er stu"y. Usually presente"
in !atri4 for!at.
2 2 'ndigenous typologies are those create" an" e4presse" #y participants an" are generate" through analyses of the local use of language. %nalyst-constructed typologies are those create" #y the research as reflecting "istinct categories #ut not generative of separate language categories. In this case the researcher applies a typology to naturally occurring variations in o#servations. >his process entails uncovering patterns( the!es( an" categories. .n" !ay %ell #e su#@ect to the legiti!ate charge of i!posing a %orl" of !eaning on the participants that #etter reflects the o#server6s %orl" than the %orl" un"er stu"y.
I.
.hat Strate ic Choices can (e appl$ that can enhance a stu!$2s enerali1a"ilit$3
Tria+2ula'io+ E!ultiple sources of "ata. >he act of #ringing !ore than one source of "ata to #ear on a single point '"erive" fro! navigation science). -ata fro! "ifferent sources can #e use" to corro#orate( ela#orate( or illu!inate the research in 3uestion. >his inclu"es !ultiple cases( !ultiple infor!ants( !ore than one "ata gathering !etho" Euse" to strengthen the stu"y6s usefulness for other settings.
I.
.hat Strate ic Choices can (e appl$ that can enhance a stu!$2s enerali1a"ilit$3
!alidi'y: es'a,lish 'he ;'ru'h -alue< o( 'he s'udy:'he 'rus')or'hi+ess o( 'he da'a.
Cre!i"ilit$: Ho% cre"i#le are the fin"ings of the stu"yG By %hat criteria can %e @u"ge the!G
>he in3uiry6s goal is to "e!onstrate that the in3uiry %as con"ucte" in such a !anner as to ensure that the su#@ect %as accurately i"entifie" an" "escri#e".
Trans%era"ilit$: Ho% transfera#le an" applica#le are these fin"ings to another setting or group of peopleG
>he #ur"en of "e!onstrating the applica#ility of one set of fin"ings to another conte4t rests !ore %ith the investigator %ho %oul" !a0e the transfer than %ith the original investigator.
Depen!a"ilit$4 Ho% can %e #e reasona#ly sure that the fin"ings %oul" #e replicate" if the stu"y %ere con"ucte" %ith the sa!e participants in the sa!e conte4tG
>he researcher atte!pts to account for changing con"itions in the pheno!enon chosen for stu"y as %ell as changes in the "esign create" #y increasingly refine" un"erstan"ing of the setting.
Con%or&a"ilit$4 Ho% can %e #e sure that the fin"ings are reflective of the su#@ects an" the in3uiry itself rather than a creation of the researcher6s #iases or pre@u"icesG
.s0 %hether the fin"ings of the stu"y coul" #e confir!e" #y another. >he assu!ption of an unchanging social %orl" is in "irect contrast to the 3ualitative interpretive assu!ption that the social %orl" is al%ays #eing constructe"( an" the concept of replication is itself pro#le!atic.
I.
I.
I.
Intro!uction
2 2 2 2
WOR.SHOP %O ULE
1ost of the participants in this training %or0shop are currently %or0ing %ith institutions that are concerne" %ith the general %elfare of the In"igenous Peoples in their respective countries. .l!ost all have( in so!e %ay( #een engage" in research a!ong the IPs in their ho!e region. So!e of the participants have #een e4pose" to for!al an" infor!al research !etho"s an" a fe% have %ritten an" pu#lishe" their reports. >his training %or0shop provi"es the opportunity for our guest participants to enrich their research 0no%le"ge an" s0ills through their participation in this research training %or0shop.
I.
.or)shop O"#ectives
WOR.SHOP %O ULE
=or this %or0shop on thnographic .pproaches %e hope: :. >o ena#le participants to share their various e4periences in relation to their %or0 %ith( an" a!ong the IPs in their respective countries. /hat 0in"s of researches have you #een involve" inG /hat research !etho"s have you e!ploye",use"G /hat %ere the pro#le!s,issues,o#stacles that you an",or your group %ere face" %ith in relation to your research %or0G Ho% "i" you confront these pro#le!sG :. &iven the "ifferent research e4posures---"o you feel that you coul" have enriche" your research #y incorporating other !etho"s,approachesG /hat research !etho"s %oul" these #eG In the lecture presente" on ethnographic research approaches --have you foun" any usefulness an" applica#ility of the concepts( !etho"s or approaches to your current or future researchesG /hich particular !etho"s( for e4a!pleA an" ho% can these #e applie"G /hich !etho"s,approaches "o you consi"er as !ost an" least useful in your research %or0G 4plain %hy( or %hy notG
8.
S$nthesis
Supplies Cee"e": !anila paper( !as0ing tape( pentel pens