Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 17

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only.

Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 2.1 Typical Values of Air Density under Specified Atmospheric Conditions
Altitude (ft)
Temperature (F)
Pressure (lb/in2)
Air density (slugs/ft3)
0
59.0
14.7
0.002378
5000
41.2
12.2
0.002045
10000
23.4
10.1
0.001755
Table 2.2 Ranges of Drag Coefficients for Typical Road Vehicles
Vehicle type
Drag coefficient (CD)
Automobile
0.25-0.55
Bus
0.5-0.7
Tractor-Trailer
0.6-1.3
Motorcycle
0.27-1.8
Table 2.3 Drag Coefficients of Selected Automobiles
Vehicle
Drag coefficient (CD)
1967 Chevrolet Corvette
0.50
1967 Volkswagen Beetle
0.46
1977 Triumph TR7
0.40
1977 Jaguar XJS
0.36
1987 Acura Integra
0.34
1987 Ford Taurus
0.32
1993 Acura Integra
0.32
1993 Ford Probe GT
0.31
1993 Ford Ranger (truck)
0.45
1996 Dodge Viper RT/10
0.45
1997 Lexus LS400
0.29
1997 Infiniti Q45
0.29
2000 Honda Insight (hybrid)
0.25
2002 Acura NSX
0.30
2002 Lexus LS430
0.25
2003 Dodge Caravan (minivan)
0.35
2003 Ford Explorer (SUV)
0.41
2003 Dodge Ram (truck)
0.53
2003 Hummer H2
0.57
2004 Mercedes Benz C240
0.27
2005 Honda Insight
0.25
2007 Honda Element
0.57
2008 Mercedes Benz SLR McLaren
0.37
Table 2.4 Typical Values of Coefficients of Road Adhesion
Coefficient of road adhesion
Pavement
Maximum
Slide
Good, dry
*1.00
0.80
Good, wet
0.90
0.60
Poor, dry
0.80
0.55
Poor, wet
0.60
0.30
Packed snow or ice
0.25
0.10
*In some instances, the coefficient of road adhesion values can exceed 1.0. See discussion at the
end of Section 2.7.

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 3.1 Stopping Sight Distance


Brake
Braking
Stopping sight
Design
reaction
distance
distance
speed
distance
on level
Calculated
Design
(mi/h)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
15
55.1
21.6
76.7
80
20
73.5
38.4
111.9
115
25
91.9
60.0
151.9
155
30
110.3
86.4
196.7
200
35
128.6
117.6
246.2
250
40
147.0
153.6
300.6
305
45
165.4
194.4
359.8
360
50
183.8
240.0
423.8
425
55
202.1
290.3
492.4
495
60
220.5
345.5
566.0
570
65
238.9
405.5
644.4
645
70
257.3
470.3
727.6
730
75
275.6
539.9
815.5
820
80
294.0
614.3
908.3
910
Note: Brake reaction distance is based on a time of 2.5 s; a deceleration rate of 11.2 ft/s2 is used to
determine calculated stopping sight distance.
Table 3.2 Design Controls for Crest Vertical Curves Based on Stopping Sight Distance
Design
Stopping sight
Rate of vertical
speed
distance
curvature, K*
(mi/h)
(ft)
Calculated
Design
15
80
3.0
3
20
115
6.1
7
25
155
11.1
12
30
200
18.5
19
35
250
29.0
29
40
305
43.1
44
45
360
60.1
61
50
425
83.7
84
55
495
113.5
114
60
570
150.6
151
65
645
192.8
193
70
730
246.9
247
75
820
311.6
312
80
910
383.7
384
*Rate of vertical curvature, K, is the length of curve per percent algebraic difference in
intersecting grades (A): K = L/A.

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 3.3 Design Controls for Sag Vertical Curves Based on Stopping Sight Distance
Design
Stopping sight
Rate of vertical
speed
distance
curvature, K*
(mi/h)
(ft)
Calculated
Design
15
80
9.4
10
20
115
16.5
17
25
155
25.5
26
30
200
36.4
37
35
250
49.0
49
40
305
63.4
64
45
360
78.1
79
50
425
95.7
96
55
495
114.9
115
60
570
135.7
136
65
645
156.5
157
70
730
180.3
181
75
820
205.6
206
80
910
231.0
231
*Rate of vertical curvature, K, is the length of curve per percent algebraic difference in
intersecting grades (A): K = L/A.
Table 3.4 Design Controls for Crest Vertical Curves Based on Passing Sight Distance
Design speed Passing sight Rate of vertical
(mi/h)
distance (ft)
curvature, K*
20
400
57
25
450
72
30
500
89
35
550
108
40
600
129
45
700
175
50
800
229
55
900
289
60
1000
357
65
1100
432
70
1200
514
75
1300
604
80
1400
700
*Rate of vertical curvature, K, is the length of curve per percent algebraic difference in
intersecting grades (A): K = L/A.

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 3.5 Minimum Radius Using Limiting Values of e and fs


Calculated
Design
Limiting
Total
radius,
speed
Maximum
values
(e/100 + fs)
Rv (ft)
(mi/h)
e (%)
of fs
10
4.0
0.38
0.42
15.9
15
4.0
0.32
0.36
41.7
20
4.0
0.27
0.32
86.0
154.3
25
4.0
0.23
0.27
250.0
30
4.0
0.20
0.24
371.2
35
4.0
0.18
0.22
533.3
40
4.0
0.16
0.20
710.5
45
4.0
0.15
0.19
925.9
50
4.0
0.14
0.18
1186.3
55
4.0
0.13
0.17
1500.0
60
4.0
0.12
0.16

Rounded
radius,
Rv (ft)
16
42
86
154
250
371
533
711
926
1190
1500

10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80

6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0

0.38
0.32
0.27
0.23
0.20
0.18
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.10
0.09
0.08

0.44
0.38
0.33
0.29
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.21
0.20
0.19
0.18
0.17
0.16
0.15
0.14

15.2
39.5
80.8
143.7
230.8
340.3
484.8
642.9
833.3
1061.4
1333.3
1656.9
2041.7
2500.0
3047.6

15
39
81
144
231
340
485
643
833
1060
1330
1660
2040
2500
3050

10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80

8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0

0.38
0.32
0.27
0.23
0.20
0.18
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.10
0.09
0.08

0.46
0.40
0.35
0.31
0.28
0.26
0.24
0.23
0.22
0.21
0.20
0.19
0.18
0.17
0.16

14.5
37.5
76.2
134.4
214.3
314.1
444.4
587.0
757.6
960.3
1200.0
1482.5
1814.8
2205.9
2666.7

14
38
76
134
214
314
444
587
758
960
1200
1480
1810
2210
2670

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 3.5 Minimum Radius Using Limiting Values of e and fs (Continued)


Calculated
Rounded
Design
Limiting
Total
radius,
radius,
speed
Maximum
values
(e/100 + fs)
Rv (ft)
Rv (ft)
(mi/h)
e (%)
of fs
10
14
10.0
0.48
0.38
13.9
36
15
10.0
0.42
0.32
35.7
72
20
10.0
0.37
0.27
72.1
25
126.3
126
10.0
0.33
0.23
30
200.0
200
10.0
0.30
0.20
35
291.7
292
10.0
0.28
0.18
40
410.3
410
10.0
0.26
0.16
45
540.0
540
10.0
0.25
0.15
50
694.4
694
10.0
0.24
0.14
55
876.8
877
10.0
0.23
0.13
60
1090.9
1090
10.0
0.22
0.12
65
1341.3
1340
10.0
0.21
0.11
70
1633.3
1630
10.0
0.20
0.10
75
1973.7
1970
10.0
0.19
0.09
80
2370.4
2370
10.0
0.18
0.08
10
0.38
13.3
13
12.0
0.50
34
15
0.32
34.1
12.0
0.44
68
20
0.27
68.4
12.0
0.39
119.0
119
25
0.23
12.0
0.35
187.5
188
30
0.20
12.0
0.32
272.2
272
35
0.18
12.0
0.30
381.0
381
40
0.16
12.0
0.28
500.0
500
45
0.15
12.0
0.27
641.0
641
50
0.14
12.0
0.26
806.7
807
55
0.13
12.0
0.25
1000.0
1000
60
0.12
12.0
0.24
1224.6
1220
65
0.11
12.0
0.23
1484.8
1480
70
0.10
12.0
0.22
1785.7
1790
75
0.09
12.0
0.21
2133.3
2130
80
0.08
12.0
0.20
Note: In recognition of safety considerations, use of emax= 4.0% should be limited to urban
conditions.

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 6.1 LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments


LOS
C
D
E
FFS = 75 mi/h
Maximum density (pc/mi/ln)
11
18
26
35
45
Average speed (mi/h)
75.0
73.8
68.3
60.9
53.3
Maximum v/c
0.34
0.55
0.74
0.89
1.00
Maximum service flow rate (pc/h/ln)
825
1330
1775
2130
2400
FFS = 70 mi/h
Maximum density (pc/mi/ln)
11
18
26
35
45
Average speed (mi/h)
70.0
70.0
66.7
60.3
53.3
Maximum v/c
0.32
0.52
0.72
0.88
1.00
Maximum service flow rate (pc/h/ln)
770
1260
1735
2110
2400
FFS = 65 mi/h
Maximum density (pc/mi/ln)
11
18
26
35
45
Average speed (mi/h)
65.0
65.0
64.0
58.8
52.2
Maximum v/c
0.30
0.50
0.71
0.88
1.00
Maximum service flow rate (pc/h/ln)
710
1170
1665
2060
2350
FFS = 60 mi/h
Maximum density (pc/mi/ln)
11
18
26
35
45
Average speed (mi/h)
60.0
60.0
60.0
57.1
51.1
Maximum v/c
0.29
0.47
0.68
0.87
1.00
Maximum service flow rate (pc/h/ln)
660
1080
1560
2000
2300
FFS = 55 mi/h
Maximum density (pc/mi/ln)
11
18
26
35
45
Average speed (mi/h)
55.0
55.0
55.0
54.7
50.0
Maximum v/c
0.27
0.44
0.64
0.85
1.00
Maximum service flow rate (pc/h/ln)
605
990
1430
1915
2250
Note: The exact mathematical relationship between density and v/c has not always been
maintained at LOS boundaries because of the use of rounded values. Density is the primary
determinant of LOS. The speed criterion is the speed at maximum density for a given LOS. LOS F
is characterized by highly unstable and variable traffic flow. Prediction of accurate flow rate,
density, and speed at LOS F is difficult.
Criterion

Table 6.2 Relationship between Free-Flow Speed and capacity on Basic Freeway Segments
Free-flow speed (mi/h)
Capacity (pc/h/ln)
75
2400
70
2400
65
2350
60
2300
55
2250
Table 6.3 Adjustment for Lane Width
Lane width (ft)
Reduction in free-flow speed, fLW (mi/h)
12
0.0
11
1.9
10
6.6

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 6.4 Adjustment for Right-Shoulder Lateral Clearance


Right-shoulder
Reduction in free-flow speed, fLC (mi/h), lanes in one direction
lateral clearance (ft)
2
3
4
5
6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.1
4
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.2
3
1.8
1.2
0.6
0.3
2
2.4
1.6
0.8
0.4
1
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.5
0
3.6
2.4
1.2
0.6

Table 6.5 Passenger Car Equivalents (PCEs) for Extended Freeway Segments
Type of terrain
Factor
Level
Rolling
Mountainous
1.5
2.5
4.5
ET (trucks and buses)
1.2
2.0
4.0
ER (RVs)

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 6.6 Passenger Car Equivalents (ET) for Trucks and Buses on Specific Upgrades
Upgrade
Length
Percentage of trucks and buses
(%)
(mi)
2
4
5
6
8
10
15
20
2
1.5
All
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
>2-3
1.5
0.00-0.25
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
>0.25-0.50
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
>0.50-0.75
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
>0.75-1.00
1.5
2.0
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
>1.00-1.50
2.0
2.5
2.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.0
2.0
>1.50
2.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
2.5
2.5
1.5
>3-4
1.5
0.00-0.25
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.0
>0.25-0.50
1.5
2.0
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
>0.50-0.75
2.0
2.5
2.0
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.5
>0.75-1.00
2.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
2.5
2.5
3.0
3.0
>1.00-1.50
2.5
3.5
2.5
3.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
>1.50
2.5
4.0
2.5
3.5
3.0
3.0
1.5
>4-5
1.5
0.00-0.25
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.0
>0.25-0.50
2.0
3.0
2.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
>0.50-0.75
2.5
3.5
2.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
>0.75-1.00
3.0
4.0
3.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
>1.00
3.0
5.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
1.5
>5-6
1.5
0.00-0.25
1.5
2.0
1.5
2.0
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.0
>0.25-0.30
2.0
4.0
2.0
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
>0.30-0.50
2.5
4.5
2.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
>0.50-0.75
3.0
5.0
3.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
3.0
>0.75-1.00
3.0
5.5
3.0
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.5
>1.00
3.5
6.0
3.5
5.0
5.0
4.5
2.5
>6
2.5
0.00-0.25
2.0
4.0
2.0
3.0
2.5
2.5
3.5
3.0
>0.25-0.30
2.5
4.5
2.5
4.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.0
>0.30-0.50
2.5
5.0
2.5
4.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.5
>0.50-0.75
3.0
5.5
3.0
5.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.0
>0.75-1.00
3.5
6.0
3.5
5.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
4.5
>1.00
4.0
7.0
4.0
6.0
5.5
5.5
Table 6.7 Passenger Car Equivalents (ER) for RVs on Specific Upgrades
Upgrade
Length
Percentage of RVs
(%)
(mi)
2
4
5
6
8
10
15
2
All
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
>2-3
0.00-0.50
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
>0.50
3.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.2
>3-4
0.00-0.25
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
>0.25-0.50 2.5
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.5
>0.50
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
>4-5
0.00-0.25
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
>0.25-0.50 4.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.0
>0.50
4.5
3.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.5
2.5
>5
0.00-0.25
4.0
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.0
2.0
>0.25-0.50 6.0
4.0
4.0
3.5
3.0
3.0
2.5
>0.50
6.0
4.5
4.0
4.5
3.5
3.0
3.0

20
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.5

25
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.5
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.0
3.5
2.0
2.5
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0

25
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.0
1.5
2.0
2.0

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 6.8 Passenger Car Equivalents (ET) for Trucks and Buses on Specific Downgrades
Downgrade
Length
Percentage of trucks and buses
(%)
(mi)
5
10
15
20
4
All
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
>4-5
4
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
>4-5
>4
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.5
>5-6
4
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
>5-6
>4
5.5
4.0
4.0
3.0
>6
4
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
>6
>4
7.5
6.0
5.5
4.5
Table 6.9 LOS Criteria for Multilane Highways
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
FFS = 60 mi/h
Maximum density (pc/mi/ln)
11
18
26
35
40
Average speed (mi/h)
60.0
60.0
59.4
56.7
55.0
Maximum v/c
0.30
0.49
0.70
0.90
1.00
Maximum service flow rate (pc/h/ln)
660
1080
1550
1980
2200
FFS = 55 mi/h
Maximum density (pc/mi/ln)
11
18
26
35
41
Average speed (mi/h)
55.0
55.0
54.9
52.9
51.2
Maximum v/c
0.29
0.47
0.68
0.88
1.00
Maximum service flow rate (pc/h/ln)
600
990
1430
1850
2100
FFS = 50 mi/h
Maximum density (pc/mi/ln)
11
18
26
35
43
Average speed (mi/h)
50.0
50.0
50.0
48.9
47.5
Maximum v/c
0.28
0.45
0.65
0.86
1.00
Maximum service flow rate (pc/h/ln)
550
900
1300
1710
2000
FFS = 45 mi/h
Maximum density (pc/mi/ln)
11
18
26
35
45
Average speed (mi/h)
45.0
45.0
45.0
44.4
42.2
Maximum v/c
0.26
0.43
0.62
0.82
1.00
Maximum service flow rate (pc/h/ln)
490
810
1170
1550
1900
Note: Density is the primary determinant of LOS. Maximum flow rate values are rounded to the
nearest 5 passenger cars.
Criterion

Table 6.10 Relationship between Free-Flow Speed and Capacity on Multilane Highway Segments
Free-flow speed (mi/h)
Capacity (pc/h/ln)
60
2200
55
2100
50
2000
45
1900

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 6.11 Adjustment for Lateral Clearance


Total lateral clearance*
Reduction in free-flow speed (mi/h)
(ft)
Four-lane highways Six-lane highways
12
0.0
0.0
10
0.4
0.4
8
0.9
0.9
6
1.3
1.3
4
1.8
1.7
2
3.6
2.8
0
5.4
3.9
*Total lateral clearance is the sum of the lateral clearances of the median (if greater than 6 ft, use 6
ft) and shoulder (if greater than 6 ft, use 6 ft). Therefore, for purposes of analysis, total lateral
clearance cannot exceed 12 ft.
Table 6.12 Adjustment for Median Type
Median type
Undivided highways
Divided highways (including TWLTLs)

Reduction in free-flow speed (mi/h)


1.6
0.0

Table 6.13 Adjustment for Access-Point Frequency


Access points/mile
Reduction in free-flow speed (mi/h)
0
0.0
10
2.5
20
5.0
30
7.5
40
10.0
Table 6.14 Adjustment for Lane Width and Shoulder Width
Reduction in free-flow speed (mi/h)
Lane
Should width (ft)
width
(ft)
0 <2
2 <4
4 <6
6
9 <10
6.4
4.8
3.5
2.2
10 <11
5.3
3.7
2.4
1.1
11 <12
4.7
3.0
1.7
0.4
12
4.2
2.6
1.3
0.0
Table 6.15 Grade Adjustment Factor for Average Travel Speed (ATS) and Percent Time Spent
Following (PTSF)*
Directional demand
Average travel speed
Percent time spent following
flow rates (veh/h)
Level
Rolling
Level
Rolling
terrain
terrain
terrain
terrain
100
1.00
0.67
1.00
0.73
200
1.00
0.75
1.00
0.80
300
0.85
1.00
0.83
1.00
400
0.90
1.00
0.90
1.00
500
0.96
1.00
0.95
1.00
600
0.97
1.00
0.97
1.00
700
0.99
1.00
0.98
1.00
800
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
900
* Linear interpolation to the nearest 0.01 is recommended.

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 6.16 Passenger Car Equivalents for Heavy Vehicles for Average Travel Speed (ATS) and
Percent Time Spent Following (PTSF)*
Range of
Average travel speed
Percent time spent following
Vehicle
two-way flow rates
Level
Rolling
Level
Rolling
type
(pc/h)
terrain
terrain
terrain
terrain
100
Trucks and
1.9
2.7
1.1
1.9
200
buses, ET
1.5
2.3
1.1
1.8
300
1.7
1.4
2.1
1.1
400
1.6
1.3
2.0
1.1
500
1.4
1.2
1.8
1.0
600
1.2
1.1
1.7
1.0
700
1.0
1.1
1.6
1.0
800
1.0
1.1
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
900
1.0
RVs, ER
1.0
1.1
1.0
All flows
* Linear interpolation to the nearest 0.01 is recommended.
Table 6.17 Adjustment for No-Passing Zones on Average Travel Speed*
No-passing zones (%)
Opposing
flow rate,
20
40
60
80
v0 (pc/h)
100
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600

1.1
2.2
1.6
1.4
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6

100
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600

0.7
1.9
1.4
1.1
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5

100
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600

0.5
1.5
1.3
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

100
200
400
600

0.2
1.2
1.1
0.6

FFS65 mi/h
2.2
3.3
2.3
1.5
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
FFS=60 mi/h
1.7
2.9
2.0
1.3
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
FFS=55 mi/h
1.2
2.4
1.9
1.1
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
FFS=50 mi/h
0.7
2.0
1.6
0.9

100

2.8
3.9
2.7
1.7
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.7

3.0
4.0
2.8
1.9
1.4
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.7

3.1
4.2
2.9
2.0
1.5
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.8

2.5
3.7
2.5
1.6
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.7

2.8
4.0
2.7
1.9
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.7

2.9
4.2
3.9
2.0
1.4
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.7

2.2
3.5
2.4
1.6
1.1
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6

2.6
3.9
2.7
1.8
1.2
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.6

2.7
4.1
2.8
1.9
1.4
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.7

1.9
3.3
2.2
1.4

2.4
3.9
2.6
1.7

2.5
4.0
2.7
1.9

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

800
1000
1200
1400
1600

0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4

0.6
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4

0.9
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5

FFS=45 mi/h
100
0.1
0.4
1.7
200
0.9
1.6
3.1
400
0.9
0.5
2.0
600
0.4
0.3
1.3
800
0.3
0.3
0.8
1000
0.3
0.3
0.6
1200
0.3
0.3
0.6
1400
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.4
1600
* Linear interpolation to the nearest 0.01 is recommended.

1.2
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.5

1.3
1.1
1.0
0.8
0.5

2.2
3.8
2.5
1.7
1.1
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.4

2.4
4.0
2.7
1.8
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.7
0.6

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 6.18 Adjustment for No-passing Zones on Percent Time Spent Following*
Two-way
No-passing zones (%)
flow rate,
0
20
40
60
80
100
(pc/h)
Directional split = 50/50
200
9.0
29.2
43.4
49.4
51.0
52.6
400
16.2
41.0
54.2
61.6
63.8
65.8
600
15.8
38.2
47.8
53.2
55.2
56.8
800
15.8
33.8
40.4
44.0
44.8
46.6
1400
12.8
20.0
23.8
26.2
27.4
28.6
2000
10.0
13.6
15.8
17.4
18.2
18.8
2600
5.5
7.7
8.7
9.5
10.1
10.3
3200
3.3
4.7
5.1
5.5
5.7
6.1
Directional split = 60/40
200
11.0
30.6
41.0
51.2
52.3
53.5
400
14.6
36.1
44.8
53.4
55.0
56.3
600
14.8
36.9
44.0
51.1
52.8
54.6
800
13.6
28.2
33.4
38.6
39.9
41.3
1400
11.8
18.9
22.1
25.4
26.4
27.3
2000
9.1
13.5
15.6
16.0
16.8
17.3
2600
5.9
7.7
8.6
9.6
10.0
10.2
Directional split = 70/30
200
9.9
28.1
38.0
47.8
48.5
49.0
400
10.6
30.3
38.6
46.7
47.7
48.8
600
10.9
30.9
37.5
43.9
45.4
47.0
800
10.3
23.6
28.4
33.3
34.5
35.5
1400
8.0
14.6
17.7
20.8
21.6
22.3
2000
7.3
9.7
15.7
13.3
14.0
14.5
Directional split = 80/20
200
8.9
27.1
37.1
47.0
47.4
47.9
400
6.6
26.1
34.5
42.7
43.5
44.1
600
4.0
24.5
31.3
38.1
39.1
40.0
800
4.8
18.5
23.5
28.4
29.1
29.9
1400
3.5
10.3
13.3
16.3
16.9
32.2
2000
3.5
7.0
8.5
10.1
10.4
10.7
Directional split = 90/10
200
4.6
24.1
33.6
43.1
43.4
43.6
400
0.0
20.2
28.3
36.3
36.7
37.0
600
-3.1
16.8
23.5
30.1
30.6
31.1
800
-2.8
10.5
15.2
19.9
20.3
20.8
1400
-1.2
5.5
8.3
11.0
11.5
11.9
* Linear interpolation to the nearest 0.01 is recommended.
Table 6.19 PTSF Coefficients for Use in Eq. 6.14*
Coefficient
Coefficient
Opposing Flow Rate, (pc/h)
200
-0.0014
0.973
400
-0.0022
0.923
600
-0.0033
0.870
800
-0.0045
0.833
1000
-0.0049
0.829
1200
-0.0054
0.825
1400
-0.0058
0.821
1600
-0.0062
0.817
*Linear interpolation of to the nearest 0.0001 and to the nearest 0.001 is recommended.

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 6.20 LOS Criteria for Two-Lane Highways


Class I
Percent time spent
Average travel
LOS
following
speed (ATS)
(PTSF)
(mi/h)
A
B
C
D
E

35
50
65
80
>80

>55
>50
>45
>40
40

Class II
Percent time spent
following
(PTSF)

Class III
Percent free-flow
speed
(PFFS)

40
55
70

>91.7
>83.3-91.7
>75.0-83.3
>66.7-75.0
66.7

85

> 85
Note: LOS F applies whenever the flow rate exceeds the segment capacity.

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 7.4 Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections


LOS
Control delay per vehicle (s/veh)
A
10
B
>10-20
C
>20-35
D
>35-55
E
>55-80
F
>80

This document is used for this class (ECI 161) and this quarter (WQ 2013) only. Other use of the content is prohibited.

Table 8.1 Typical Values of and for Bureau of Public Roads Highway Performance Function
(see Mannering et al. 1989)
Performance function parameters
Route speed
Route capacity,
limit (mi/h)
xcn (veh/h)

<30
<250
0.7312
3.6596
<30
251-499
0.6128
3.5038
<30
500-749
0.8774
4.4613
<30
750-999
0.6846
5.1644
<30
1000+
1.1465
4.4239
31-40
<499
0.6190
3.6544
31-40
500-749
0.6662
4.9432
31-40
750-999
0.6222
5.1409
31-40
1000+
1.0300
5.5226
41-50
<750
0.6609
5.0906
41-50
750-999
0.5423
5.7894
41-50
1000+
1.0091
6.5856
>50
<750
0.8776
4.9287
>50
750-999
0.7699
5.3443
>50
1000+
1.1491
6.8677
Table 8.2 Example of a peak-hour vehicle origin-destination trips with the five traffic analysis
zones (TAZs) shown in Fig. 8.8
Origin traffic
Destination traffic analysis zone
Total
analysis zone
origin trips
1
2
3
4
5
1
1783
386
245
213
2627
2
2378
546
197
101
3222
3
4412
2232
745
343
7732
4
1399
1201
822
212
3634
5
3386
2866
1202
345
7799
Total destination trips
11575
8082
2956
1532
869

Вам также может понравиться