I agree with this article.

Most of professionals go to the universities just for a degree, and they (Use a period after degree as you complete a sentence; try to avoid using more than one conjunction in a sentence or you create a compound-complex sentence that is difficult to use.) Many think that it is enough to call themselves good professionals; (when using a conjunction, in this case but, use a comma to separate the clause as a semicolon is a conjunction and you cannot use two conjunctions together) but we must take in account that these problems are not only found in the field of education, we can find them in any professional fields. In relation to the teaching a foreign language, in this case English, personally I believe that every (when you use the qualifier every, it is plural and the nouns that follow must singular, so write institution or university, that as that applies to inanimate objects, while which applies to animate objects: people) institutions or university ties, which that offer this English courses, (this is singular and courses in plural, you need to write this English course or these English courses) must put emphasis) on whatthe correct use of the language or the subject matter expertise of the instructor?) and be caution cautious when they hire an English professor. These professors must have a superior knowledge of the English language. It involves knowledge about linguistic and constant investigation since language is in constant evolution. (While this last sentence is technically correct, permit me to recommend you write in constant change since constant applies to change, but if you want to use evolution, you must write continuous evolutionand not mix metaphors.) It (what is It: education as a discipline, academic leaders, or you?) believes that students of Education (unless education is a specific and separate department, it should be lower case) in languages must be only educated (define what you mean by must only be educated as it does not tell the reader what the person must be educated in what subject, etc.) in order to teach traditional English. It means;(use a colon, not a semicolon, as a colon indicates that it will be followed either by examples or by a list representative of the subject you have a list) present simple, past simple, present progressive, past progressive and their respective uses, etc. I do not say that it is not a good beginning; but these topics constantly are repeated every year (1 to 5 grade), without advancing with new topics. I do agree with you in part, but I do not believe that is a good way to begin learning the language; tense only is a part, and a professional, welleducated, English major needs to know spelling, reading, writing, grammar, and so forth not just verb tense. Students of educated of language (in English adjectives come in most cases before nouns, in Spanish the adjective comes after the noun) language education are only focus in on the traditional English and how to improve theirs (there is already plural so it does not require an s as it is not a personal pronoun) methodology and didactic, and not about what is the most important aspect of , English: the language itself (ambiguity, syntax, lexicography, morphology, semantic, pragmatics, how to use a term in a specific context, idiomatic expression, and so forth.). Students can achieve this by just investigating and acquired acquiring constant knowledge. (When you use a gerund, you are referring to an action that occurs at this time (now) and can continue into the future.)

This is an excellent paper. Please rewrite by making the red black, and deleting the highlighted errors, and considering the recommendation. Then return it to me. At this point this composition is worth 14 points, and after you return it to me, if all is correct, you will merit 17 points. Good work.

Dr. Ide