Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

Abstract

This is a retrospective analysis of 143 patients with histologically confirmed epidermoid carcinoma of thenasopharynx treated with definitive irradiation. Patients were treated with a combination of Cobalt-60, 4 to 6 MV X rays, and 18 to 25 MV X rays to the primary tumor and the upper necks, excluding the spinal cord at 4000 to 4500 cGy to total doses of 6000 to 7000 cGy. At 10 years the actuarial primary tumor failure rate was 15% in Tl, 25% in T2, 33% in T3, and 60% in T4 lesions. The corresponding failure rate in the neck was 18% for N0, 14% for Nl, and 33% for N2 and N3 lymphadenopathy. The incidence of distant metastasis was related to the stage of the cervical lymphadenopathy: 16% in patients with NO-N1 nodes compared with 40% in the N2-3 node group. The actuarial 10-year disease-free survival rate was 55% to 60% for T1-3N0-1 tumors, 45% for T1-3N2-3 tumors, 35% for T4NO-1, and 20% for T4N2-3 lesions. The overall 10-year survival rate was about 40% for patients with Tl-2NO-1 tumors, 30% for those with T3 any N stage tumors, and only 10% for the patients with T4 lesions. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor stage and histological type, cranial nerve involvement, patient age, and doses of irradiation to the nasopharynx were significant prognostic factors for local/regional tumor control. Increasing doses of irradiation resulted in nasopharynxtumor control in 80% of the patients receiving 6600 to 7000 cGy and 100% of those receiving over 7000 cGy in the TI, T2, and T3 tumors. However, the tumor control rate did not rise above 55% even for doses over 7000 cGy in the T4 lesions. Local tumor control was higher in patients who had simulation ( = 71%) compared with those on whom simulation was not performed ( had 69% primary tumor control ( 75% adequate portal films (p = 0.07). ) compared with 53% ( = 56%) (p = 0.10). Moreover, patients with more than 75% of the reviewed films judged as adequate ) for those with fewer than

Keywords

Nasopharynx; Radiation therapy; Prognostic factors http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/036030169290741Y

Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to calculate the costs of chemotherapy and highdose-rate brachytherapy in advanced-stage nasopharyngeal cancer. It is argued whether the effect of chemotherapy and this type of high-dose, high-precision radiation therapy is worth the costs. Methods and Materials: Clinical results of Stage IIIIVB nasopharyngeal cancer in patients treated between 1991 and 2000 are reported. Treatment was broken down into five categories: workup, chemotherapy, preparation of radiation therapy, and application of radiation. For each category, costs were computed. Nasopharyngeal cancer treatment costs were compared with costs previously reported on patients treated for cancers of the oral cavity, larynx, and oropharynx. Results: With the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and high cumulative doses of radiation (7781 Gy) with brachytherapy, disease-free survival increased from 48% to 74% (p = 0.002), and overall survival increased from 35% to 72% (p = 0.005). The Rotterdam protocol has been implemented stepwise: as of 1991, costs per patient increased from 4521 Euros (US$5023; 2001 exchange rate [December]: 1 Euro ~ 0.88 US$) for conventional external beam radiation therapy to 13,728 Euros (US$15,253) in 2000 for combinations of chemotherapy, conventional external beam radiation therapy, and brachytherapy. In case of stereotactic radiotherapy, the cost was 14,516 Euros (US$16,495). Conclusions: Costs for cancer in the nasopharynx vary from 14,528 Euros (US$16,509) to 15,316 Euros (US$17,405) in case of brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy, respectively, if follow-up costs are added. The treatment cost for other head and neck sites was 21,858 Euros (US$24,126). Given the improvement in survival, the sparing capabilities of current high-dose, high-precision radiotherapy techniques, and the favorable cost profile compared with other sites, it is argued that costs should not be considered prohibitive for the introduction of chemotherapy and hightechnology-based radiotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal cancer.

Keywords

Nasopharynx; Brachytherapy; Stereotaxy; Chemotherapy; Costs http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538472102000053

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a rare malignancy with an incidence well under one per 100,000 person-years, except for some geographic areas, such as Asia. The prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma is related to its potential for locoregional invasion and metastatic spread. Radiotherapy alone remains the standard treatment for early stages. However, for locally advanced disease, chemotherapy may offer some benefit as a radiosensitizer while treating microscopic spread disease. Chemoradiotherapy is now the standard treatment for locally advanced and/or node-positive patients. Platinum-based therapy is the preferred regimen for this therapeutic approach. In this review, we discuss all treatment modalities available for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, including the standard of care and what therapeutic options could be available for those patients who progress after the standard treatment has been delivered. http://www.expert-reviews.com/doi/abs/10.1586/era.10.1

Вам также может понравиться